DOCSLIB.ORG

A R Iz O N a U T a H California C a L If O R N Ia Oregon Idaho

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A R Iz O N a U T a H California C a L If O R N Ia Oregon Idaho DESIGNATED GROUNDWATER BASINS OF NEVADA £ * # £ 47N £ £ J OREGON IDAHO k a 11 e Jackpot r 18E 19E 10 24E 25E e b 20E 21E 5 McDermitt r 47N Denio £ 22E 26E 28E i 23E C 27E d E E Owyhee g e 2 2 68E 69E 70E / / 1 66E 67E 1 55E 6 1 47N 63E 64E 65E 4 46N 3 44E 46E 49E 50E 51E 52E 53E 57E 59E 60E 61E 62E 45E 47E 48E 5 2 54E 47N 56E 58E 30E 31E 32E 33E s 140 34E 35E 38E 41E B l 36E 37E 39E l 13 U 40E 42E 43E ru C V a K n a r e n F i R 46N n e a y g 39 o v u Mountain i n s i v 41 R 12 R e iv r Jarbidge Peak City e * 45N 2 *Capitol Peak 34 46N r 46N * Matterhorn C O re w ek 45N No y Copper Mtn. rth h n Fo e * o R rk e 33B 37 lm i L R a 44N v it 45N S 30A e t iv 4 140 r le e VU r 7 45N H u m Sun C 44N n bo 38 reek n ld 0 i t 40 u 68 9 Q Granite Peak 35 Wildhorse 44N 1 43N 33A * 8 3 29 Reservoir 9 44N 43N Vya U M a r 42N 43N ys Orovada* Santa Rosa Peak 30B 43N T 42N 27 *McAfee Peak 14 67 41N *Jacks Peak 42N A R S N 42N out h i F o v 41N e o r r r k t h 189B 189C L i 189A H t t l 40N Chimney e 41N 15 F 41N H Reservoir o u r r 25 e m k Tecoma v 42 40N i b 44 R o l d Humboldt t 36 R 40N i 39N 69 v r e 40N r e 93 v H U M B O L D T i £ 26 ¤ 189D 39N R t Montello ld 63 o b 39N 32 m R 38N 39N u E Li K O v 233 H e VU r 38N e 225 n l t VU in t u i Q ¤£95 L 31 38N 38N 66 Cobre 37N 16 37N Wells Ma 28 gg 80 ie ¨¦§ 37N Pilot Peak* A 37N Oasis 36N 36N C I r R e 93 e o ¤£ k c k 36N * Hole in the 36N Mtn. Peak 24 35N N 17 Winnemucca 191 35N 50 43 6C 2 51 70 r 64 re e ek 35N iv 228 R VU t 35N R d 34N l 34N o 80 b 188 m 65 ¨¦§ u 49 Elko H 34N O 18 34N 61 West Wendover 33N 23 33N 45 177 33N South F 72 Rye Patch Fo 71 52 rk Reservoir 33N Carlin H u Gerlach m I 21 b 32N South Fork o 32N Battle Mountain ld t 80 Reservoir R iv ¨¦§ 32N e 80 r L 32N ¨¦§ 60 H r umboldt Rive 31N 447 *Spruce Mtn. 31N VU ¤£93A 48 46 A 31N 31N 30NW A S H O E 192 30N 93 306 ¤£ C 79 VU 187 22 131 30N 59 98 30N * Tipton Peak Green Mountain 29N * 29N VU305 Franklin 176 178A 54 Lake 73A 29N 19 P E R S H I N G 29N 20 28N 28N 47 186B 78 129 Currie 73 28N 28N 130 Pearl Peak 27N 81 L A N D E R E U R E K A * 80 27N Lovelock Ruby 132 Marshes e 27N k 27N 97 a 186A L 278 26N 26N £ VU £ a 18E Pyramid c c 26N 70E 19E 20E 22E 26N 63E 64E 65E 66E 67E 68E 69E 23E u 24E 25E 56E 57E 58E 59E 60E 61E 62E Lake 26E 27E 28E 29E 30E 31E 49E 50E 51E 52E 53E 54E 55E m 32E 33E 34E 35E 36E 37E 38E 39E 40E 41E 42E 43E 44E 45E 46E 47E 48E e Humboldt n 25N 25N 96 n Lake i 101A W 58 53 25N 447 25N 95 VU 24N 24N 93 ¤£ 193 55 24N 99 VU445 24N 23N Roberts Creek Mtn. 185 23N 94 74 * Christina Peak A * 178B 77 0 446 0 VU 1 128 23N 23N 22N 22N 93 84 75 57 138 153 W H I T E 447 0 VU 0 22N 194 1 92A 22N 21N 82 * Mt. Callaghan 21N 92B 85 179 395 175 A ¤£ C H U R C H 2I1N L L 21N 0 0 1 20N 86 Fernley 20N 305 VU 139 * Diamond Peak 184 Sparks er Reno iv 76 133 50 R 20N ¤£ 20N T 80 19N ruc e ¨¦§ 83 * Mt. Augusta ke Eureka P I N E 19N 95A ¤£ 50 101 Austin 87 STOREY ¤£ 154 Fallon 152 19N 395 19N 18N ¤£ Silver Springs * North Schell Peak 18N 50 McGill 91 Lahonton ¤£ Res. 56 *Antelope Peak Mt. Rose* 88 18N * 18N *Taft Peak 17N 431 * Desatoya Peak Summit Mtn. * VU* 102 17N Virginia City Carson 50 126 South Schell Peak Slide Mtn. ¤£ Washoe Lake 127 Ruth 16N Lake 134 Bald Mtn. 17N *Mt. Moriah 17N * Cleve Creek Baldy 90 Ely * 89 Bunker Hill 16N 50 * 151 174 £ 103 125 722 er * ¤ L Y O N VU iv Mt. Hamilton 16N R 16N e Carson o r 140A r h lke R *Cave Mtn. e a iv 95 195 15N a City e v r 15N i W ¤£ T R 95A North Shoshone Peak Ward Mtn. 104 £ 124 * * e ¤ * Ninemile Peak k 15N a 155A 15N Toiyabe Range Peak 6 L * ¤£ 14N 14N Weber 123 ¤£50 n Res. so White Rock Mountain Savory Mtn. 6 Buck Mtn. r South Shoshone Peak * ¤£ Baker a * * * C 14N * 14N * Masket Peak Bald Mtn. 13N Wheeler Peak 13N *Wildcat Peak 13 1/2N * D O U G L A S 93 487 Minden e ¤£ Pyramid Peak VU * s * Artesia Schurz e East Peak Gardnerville Yerington e 137B Lake R 12N 13N * Mt. Washington 12N Mt. Siegel £ 339 er Currant Mtn. £ VU iv 13N 19E 105 * in R * Lincoln Peak 108 E Tw ÷ø379 * 2 rk 70E !" / 69E 88 110A Fo 20E 1 . White Pine 21E 22E 12N 67E 68E 23E 24E N 66E 25E 26E 1 Gabbs * 62E 63E 64E 65E * 27E 28E 29E 3 Peak 61E Granite Peak ker 30E 31E 32E 33E 41E rk 58E 59E 60E Wal 34E 35E 36E 37E 38E 39E 40E o 12N 56E 57E 11N r F 42E 43E 44E 155B 11N ve . 395 i S £ R Arc Dome * 45E 46E 47E 48E 49E 50E 51E 52E 53E 54E 55E ¤ k r o 106 F 107 122 11N 150 st Wellington r South Summit e 208 e e ø W v 10N VU i k * 11N 10N R a Topaz 135 Round Mountain Currant L Mt. Grafton 173B * Lake r e 110B r 140B k 10N l e 10N k a l a 9N W 9N W 180 VU338 9N 9N ÷ø376 155C *Mt. Grant VU361 8N 8N Hawthorne k 121B * 109 r 95 207 318 183 196 East Sister o ¤£ VUø F Luning 8N N Y E 8N 7N 7N East *Corey Peak 110C 121A ¤£6 VU359 7N 137A 7N 6N Mina 6N M I N E R A L 120 156 6N 6N Beauty Peak * Troy Peak r e * 5N v 5N i Brawley Peaks 111A R * 136 5N 5N 4N VU360 4N 111B 119 201 149 112 Warm Springs 4N VU375 4N 3N 95 6 202 3N £ ¤£ 93 113 114 ¤ 141 ¤£ 3N 3N 2N Coaldale ¤£95 Tonopah 2N 118 181 Government * 172 1 2N Peak 15 6 2N Pioche 200 ¤£ 208 e t 1N 1N *Kawich Peak i 116 h 199 171 W 173A * 1N Highland Peak 1N 95 ¤£ 198 1S 1S £ E Boundary Peak E 71E HYDROGRAPHIC REGIONS OF NEVADA * 2 70E 2 142 / 68E 69E / £ 67E 1 1S 63E 64E 65E 66E 1 62E 1S 58E 60E 61E 1 59E 0 53E 55E 56E 57E 33E 34E 5 52E 54E 319 35E 36E 37E 38E 4 51E 39E 40E 41E 42E 43E 44E 45E 46E 47E 48E 49E 50E VU 203 Panaca 197 2S U 2S 117 148 170 L I N C O L N 2S Goldfield Cedar Peak 2S * 3S T 1 3S 143 3 A 3S *Mt. Irish 2 11 Caliente 3S Hiko ¤£93 HUMBOLDT 4S 4S H ELKO 145 E S M E R A L D A 4S 4S 375 204 E ÷ø 5S * Quartzite Mountain 182 O 5S 144 H 4 R S 147 157 PERSHING A E 5S A K *Bald Mtn. D E 266 W 6S N VU R 209 6S A * Magruder Mtn. U L E 158A 7 5 6S Alamo 7S 7S 6 Scottys Junction 169A WHITE 7S 8 205 8S CHURCHILL PINE 267 206 8S 232 VU 146 LYON 1. NORTHWEST REGION 8S D 9S O 2. BLACK ROCK DESERT REGION 221 U 9S 228 G 231 L A 10 3. SNAKE RIVER BASIN 9S S ¤£93 9 227B 158B 10S MINERAL 4. HUMBOLDT RIVER BASIN 10S 159 NYE 10S 5. WEST CENTRAL REGION 169B 210 11S 11S 222 6. TRUCKEE RIVER BASIN 11S ESMERALDA 12 12S LINCOLN 7. WESTERN REGION Beatty 168 12S 12S 8. CARSON RIVER BASIN 160 Mesquite 13S 9. WALKER RIVER BASIN 13S 219 95 227A 161 15 ¤£ 229 13S ¨¦§ er iv 10. CENTRAL REGION A R m a 220 in rg g 14S o Moapa ir 14S sa V 14 11.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Northern Paiute and Western Shoshone Land Use in Northern Nevada: a Class I Ethnographic/Ethnohistoric Overview
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management NEVADA NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Ginny Bengston CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES NO. 12 2003 SWCA ENVIROHMENTAL CON..·S:.. .U LTt;NTS . iitew.a,e.El t:ti.r B'i!lt e.a:b ~f l-amd :Nf'arat:1.iern'.~nt N~:¥G~GI Sl$i~-'®'ffl'c~. P,rceP,GJ r.ei l l§y. SWGA.,,En:v,ir.e.m"me'Y-tfol I €on's.wlf.arats NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Submitted to BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Nevada State Office 1340 Financial Boulevard Reno, Nevada 89520-0008 Submitted by SWCA, INC. Environmental Consultants 5370 Kietzke Lane, Suite 205 Reno, Nevada 89511 (775) 826-1700 Prepared by Ginny Bengston SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 02-551 December 16, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................v List of Tables .................................................................v List of Appendixes ............................................................ vi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................1 CHAPTER 2. ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW .....................................4 Northern Paiute ............................................................4 Habitation Patterns .......................................................8 Subsistence .............................................................9 Burial Practices ........................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Saddlebrooke Hiking Club Hike Database 11-15-2020 Hike Location Hike Rating Hike Name Hike Description
    SaddleBrooke Hiking Club Hike Database 11-15-2020 Hike Location Hike Rating Hike Name Hike Description AZ Trail B Arizona Trail: Alamo Canyon This passage begins at a point west of the White Canyon Wilderness on the Tonto (Passage 17) National Forest boundary about 0.6 miles due east of Ajax Peak. From here the trail heads west and north for about 1.5 miles, eventually dropping into a two- track road and drainage. Follow the drainage north for about 100 feet until it turns left (west) via the rocky drainage and follow this rocky two-track for approximately 150 feet. At this point there is new signage installed leading north (uphill) to a saddle. This is a newly constructed trail which passes through the saddle and leads downhill across a rugged and lush hillside, eventually arriving at FR4. After crossing FR4, the trail continues west and turns north as you work your way toward Picketpost Mountain. The trail will continue north and eventually wraps around to the west side of Picketpost and somewhat paralleling Alamo Canyon drainage until reaching the Picketpost Trailhead. Hike 13.6 miles; trailhead elevations 3471 feet south and 2399 feet north; net elevation change 1371 feet; accumulated gains 1214 northward and 2707 feet southward; RTD __ miles (dirt). AZ Trail A Arizona Trail: Babbitt Ranch This passage begins just east of the Cedar Ranch area where FR 417 and FR (Passage 35) 9008A intersect. From here the route follows a pipeline road north to the Tub Ranch Camp. The route continues towards the corrals (east of the buildings).
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowstone National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping
    Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping Summary Yellowstone National Park This document summarizes the results of a geologic resource evaluation scoping session that was held at Yellowstone National Park on May 16–17, 2005. The NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD) organized this scoping session in order to view and discuss the park’s geologic resources, address the status of geologic maps and digitizing, and assess resource management issues and needs. In addition to GRD staff, participants included park staff and cooperators from the U.S. Geological Survey and Colorado State University (table 1). Table 1. Participants of Yellowstone’s GRE Scoping Session Name Affiliation Phone E-Mail Bob Volcanologist, USGS–Menlo Park 650-329-5201 [email protected] Christiansen Geologist/GRE Program GIS Lead, NPS Tim Connors 303-969-2093 [email protected] Geologic Resources Division Data Stewardship Coordinator, Greater Rob Daley 406-994-4124 [email protected] Yellowstone Network Supervisory Geologist, Yellowstone Hank Heasler 307-344-2441 [email protected] National Park Geologist, NPS Geologic Resources Bruce Heise 303-969-2017 [email protected] Division Cheryl Geologist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-2208 [email protected] Jaworowski Katie Geologist/Senior Research Associate, 970-586-7243 [email protected] KellerLynn Colorado State University Branch Chief, NPS Geologic Resources Carol McCoy 303-969-2096 [email protected] Division Ken Pierce Surficial Geologist, USGS–Bozeman 406-994-5085 [email protected] Supervisory GIS Specialist, Yellowstone Anne Rodman 307-344-7381 [email protected] National Park Shannon GIS Specialist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-7381 [email protected] Savage Monday, May 16, involved a welcome to Yellowstone National Park and an introduction to the Geologic Resource Evaluation (GRE) Program, including status of reports and digital maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for the USA (W7A
    Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7A - Arizona) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S53.1 Issue number 5.0 Date of issue 31-October 2020 Participation start date 01-Aug 2010 Authorized Date: 31-October 2020 Association Manager Pete Scola, WA7JTM Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Document S53.1 Page 1 of 15 Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE CONTROL....................................................................................................................................... 3 DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Program Derivation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 General Information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Final Ascent
    [Show full text]
  • Backcountry Discovery Trail
    Have you ever wanted to get into the backcountry Backcountry of a National Forest? Have you wondered if you have Discovery Trail what it takes? Rest assured: exploring the backcountry doesn’t necessarily require an ATV or a dirt bike. You can do it in a high clearance vehicle or a 4WD sport utility vehicle. This guide gives directions for the route from point to point, gives tips on what to bring and how to prepare, provides background information on history and general topics, and directs travelers to points of interest along the way. This 150-mile-long discovery trail is a perfect place to begin your explorations of the Plumas National Forest! Plumas National Forest Plumas National Forest Backcountry Discovery Trail The Plumas Backcountry Discovery Trail is published by the USDA Forest Service, in cooperation with the California State Parks OHV Division. Printed in the USA 2013 ISBN: Welcome to the Plumas Backcountry Discovery Trail The Plumas Backcountry Discovery Trail (BDT) invites exploration of the remote areas of the Plumas National Forest. You can expect rough road conditions on gravel and dirt roads and a slow pace of travel, maybe only 30-50 miles a day. Be prepared for downed trees or rocks on the road, rough and rocky surfaces, and brush encroaching on the road- way. Much of the route is under snow in the winter and early spring. There are no restaurants, grocery stores, or gas stations along the main route and cell phone coverage is intermittent. The non-paved roads are currently maintained for travel by sport utility vehicles (SUVs) and high-clearance vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Climbing America's
    batical leave in Scandinavia, I finally reached the 5895m summit of Africa’s high- est mountain. In 1986, the year after I climbed Kilimanjaro, Dick Bass, Frank Wells, and Rick Ridgeway published Seven Summits, an account of Bass and Wells’ attempt to climb the highest peak on each of the world’s seven continents. I bought their book and devoured it. Inspired by it, I devised my own climbing goal—to climb at least ‘Three-and-a-Half Summits’: namely, at least three of the six highest of the Seven Summits plus Australia’s Mt Kosciuszko, which is a mere 2228m above sea level (i.e., less than half the height of Antarctica’s Vinson Massif, the sixth-lowest of the Seven Summits), and Kosciuszko can therefore, as a Kiwi I quipped, really only be regarded as a half-summit. I made reasonably quick progress towards achieving my goal. In August 1994, I climbed Russia’s Mt Elbrus, 5642m, the highest mountain in Europe. In December the same year, I summited 6962m-high Cerro Aconcagua in Argentina, the highest mountain in South America (which I like to tell people is ‘the highest mountain in the world outside Asia,’ and then hope their geography is so weak that they don’t realise how huge an exclusion clause those two words, ‘outside Asia’, are). I then decided to have a crack at climbing Denali, and on 6 July 1997 stood proudly on the 6194m-high summit of North America’s high- est peak and held up a t-shirt from Victoria University (which is where I taught political science for many years).
    [Show full text]
  • 2013-9-19 Water System Plan Figure
    DESIGNATED GROUNDWATER BASINS OF NEVADA £ * # £ OREGON £ IDAHO 47N £ 11 J k Jackpot 10 a 24E e 18E 19E 25E r 20E 21E 5 e McDermitt b 22E 23E 26E 28E Denio r 47N 27E i Owyhee d C £ g 69E 70E 1 e 68E 6 55E 66E 67E 47N 62E 63E 64E 65E 46N 44E 45E 46E 47E 48E 49E 50E 51E 52E 53E 56E 57E 58E 59E 60E 61E 541/2E 231/2E 30E 31E 33E 54E 47N 13 VU140 32E 34E 35E 36E 37E 38E 39E 40E 41E 42E B 43E ru C K n a r e n 46N i Falls n a R 39 y e g u o v Mountain n s i i 41 12 v R R i e Jarbidge Peak City v r * 45N e 2 *Capitol Peak 34 46N r 46N * Matterhorn C O re ek 45N N w ort y Copper Mtn. h h n Fo e * o rk e R 33B 37 lm 44N 30A i L R 45N a 140 v it i S 4 VU e tl v r e e 7 45N H r u Su 44N m 38 n Cre n bo ek n ld 40 i 68 t u 35 Q Granite Peak Wildhorse 44N 43N 3 33A * 190 8 29 Reservoir 9 44N 43N Vya UTAH M ar 42N Orovada* 43N ys 30B 43N Santa Rosa Peak 27 42N *McAfee Peak 14 67 41N *Jacks Peak 42N S 42N o R uth N i v F o 41N o e r r r k t 189B h 189C L 189A i t t 40N l 41N 15 Chimney e 41N Reservoir H F o u 25 r r Tecoma e m k 42 40N iv 44 b R o l Humb d 36 oldt t R 40N 69 i 39N v 40N r e 93 H U M B O L D T r e ¤£ 26 v 189D i 39N R Montello t 63 ld o 39N 32 b E L K O m R 233 38N 39N u i VU v H e r 225 38N e VU n l n t i t u 95 i Q ¤£ L 31 38N 16 38N 66 Cobre 37N 37N Wells Ma 80 28 gg i ¨¦§ e 37N Pilot Peak* 37N Oasis 36N 36N C r 93 R e ¤£ o e c k Hole in the k 36N * 24 36N Mtn.
    [Show full text]
  • Ar Iz Onautah California Cal If Orn Ia Oregon Idaho
    DESIGNATED GROUNDWATER BASINS OF NEVADA £ * # £ 47N £ £ J OREGON IDAHO k a 11 e Jackpot r 18E 19E 10 24E 25E e b 20E 21E 5 McDermitt r 47N Denio £ 22E 26E 28E i 23E C 27E d E E Owyhee g e 2 2 68E 69E 70E / / 1 66E 67E 1 55E 6 1 47N 63E 64E 65E 4 46N 3 44E 46E 49E 50E 51E 52E 53E 57E 59E 60E 61E 62E 45E 47E 48E 5 2 54E 47N 56E 58E 30E 31E 32E 33E s 140 34E 35E 38E 41E B l 36E 37E 39E l 13 U 40E 42E 43E ru C V a K n a r e n F i R 46N n e a y g 39 o v u Mountain i n s i v 41 R 12 R e iv r Jarbidge Peak City e * 45N 2 *Capitol Peak 34 46N r 46N * Matterhorn C O re w ek 45N No y Copper Mtn. rth h n Fo e * o R rk e 33B 37 lm i L R a 44N v it 45N S 30A e t iv 4 140 r le e VU r 7 45N H u m Sun C 44N n bo 38 reek n ld 0 i t 40 u 68 9 Q Granite Peak 35 Wildhorse 44N 1 43N 33A * 8 3 29 Reservoir 9 44N 43N Vya U M a r 42N 43N ys Orovada* Santa Rosa Peak 30B 43N T 42N 27 *McAfee Peak 14 67 41N *Jacks Peak 42N A R S N 42N out h i F o v 41N e o r r r k t h 189B 189C L i 189A H t t l 40N Chimney e 41N 15 F 41N H Reservoir o u r r 25 e m k Tecoma v 42 40N i b 44 R o l d Humboldt t 36 R 40N i 39N 69 v r e 40N r e 93 v H U M B O L D T i £ 26 ¤ 189D 39N R t Montello ld 63 o b 39N 32 m R 38N 39N u E Li K O v 233 H e VU r 38N e 225 n l t VU in t u i Q ¤£95 L 31 38N 38N 66 Cobre 37N 16 37N Wells Ma 28 gg 80 ie ¨¦§ 37N Pilot Peak* A 37N Oasis 36N 36N C I r R e 93 e o ¤£ k c k 36N * Hole in the 36N Mtn.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for the Great Basin National Heritage Area Approved April 30, 2013
    Management Plan for the Great Basin National Heritage Area Approved April 30, 2013 Prepared by the Great Basin Heritage Area Partnership Baker, Nevada i ii Great Basin National Heritage Area Management Plan September 23, 2011 Plans prepared previously by several National Heritage Areas provided inspiration for the framework and format for the Great Basin National Heritage Area Management Plan. National Park Service staff and documents provided guidance. We gratefully acknowledge these contributions. This Management Plan was made possible through funding provided by the National Park Service, the State of Nevada, the State of Utah and the generosity of local citizens. 2011 Great Basin National Heritage Area Disclaimer Restriction of Liability The Great Basin Heritage Area Partnership (GBHAP) and the authors of this document have made every reasonable effort to insur e accuracy and objectivity in preparing this plan. However, based on limitations of time, funding and references available, the parties involved make no claims, promises or guarantees about the absolute accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this document and expressly disclaim liability for errors and omissions in the contents of this plan. No warranty of any kind, implied, expressed or statutory, including but not limited to the warranties of non-infringement of third party rights, title, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, is given with respect to the contents of this document or its references. Reference in this document to any specific commercial products, processes, or services, or the use of any trade, firm or corporation name is for the inf ormation and convenience of the public, and does not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the GBHAP or the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • LANDSCAPE NEWS Volume 16, Issue 2: February-March 2017
    Eastern Nevada Landscape Coalition LANDSCAPE NEWS Volume 16, Issue 2: February-March 2017 Weather Doesn’t Slow Winter Weed Conference On January 11-12, 2017, ENLC and Tri-County Weed successfully hosted their 12th Annual Winter Weed Conference. We had over 90 registered participants, and even though Mother Nature decided to throw some wicked weather at the West, the majority of registrants and presenters made it through blizzards and floods to attend the conference. We were fortunate to have generous presenters who were willing to fill in and do additional presentations for presenters who were unable to get through the weather to make the conference. Instead of detailing the highlights of the conference, we have included several of the presenter’s abstracts below. If you would like a copy of their PowerPoint presentations please contact the ENLC office. The presentations covered a wide range of topics from updates by the Nevada Department of Agriculture and laws and regulations to mapping and control Jani Ahlvers (right) and John Watt of ENLC. presentations on curly dock, Russian olive, tamarisk, ventenata, and viper grass. increasing infestations are wide-ranging, but all have one thing in common: the need to know the location Spatial Imagery Solutions for Identifying, and extent(s) of the invasives of interest. One very Mapping, and Monitoring Invasive Species in the effective, and efficient, solution for addressing this Great Basin, Jeff Campbell spatial need is the utilization of multi-spectral spatial Contact: [email protected] imagery. The plethora of satellite and aerial based Over the last century, increased human activity sources of imagery affords resource managers of today across the west, and particularly throughout the Great a valuable set of tools for mapping invasive species Basin, has resulted in an ever-changing landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Ants of Nevada
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 38 Number 4 Article 2 12-31-1978 Mountain ants of Nevada George C. Wheeler Adjunct Research Associate, Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada Jeanette Wheeler Adjunct Research Associate, Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Wheeler, George C. and Wheeler, Jeanette (1978) "Mountain ants of Nevada," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 38 : No. 4 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol38/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. MOUNTAIN ANTS OF NEVADA George C. Wheeler' and Jeanette Wheeler' Abstract.- Introductory topics include "The High Altitude Environment," "Ants Recorded from High Alti- tudes," "Adaptations of Ants," "Mountain Ants of North America," and "The Mountains of Nevada." A Nevada mountain ant species is defined as one that inhabits the Coniferous Forest Biome or Alpine Biome or the ecotone between them. A table gives a taxonomic list of the mountain ants and shows the biomes in which they occur; it also indicates whether they occur in lower biomes. This list comprises 50 species, which is 28 percent of the ant fauna we have found in Nevada. Only 30 species (17 percent of the fauna) are exclusively montane; these are in the genera Mymiica, Manica, Stenamma, Leptothorax, Camponottis, Lasiiis, and Formica. The article concludes with "Records for Nevada Mountain Ants." All known records for each species are cited.
    [Show full text]