DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Loop Unbundling and Bitstream Access: Regulatory Practice in Europe and the U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Loop Unbundling and Bitstream Access: Regulatory Practice in Europe and the U.S A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Baake, Pio (Ed.); Preissl, Brigitte (Ed.) Research Report Local Loop Unbundling and Bitstream Access: Regulatory Practice in Europe and the U.S. DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, No. 20 Provided in Cooperation with: German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin) Suggested Citation: Baake, Pio (Ed.); Preissl, Brigitte (Ed.) (2006) : Local Loop Unbundling and Bitstream Access: Regulatory Practice in Europe and the U.S., DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, No. 20, ISBN 3-938762-10-1, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-2011011810273 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/129150 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt Local Loop Unbundling and Bitstream Access: 20 Regulatory Practice in Europe and the U.S. Pio Baake, Brigitte Preissl (Editors) Johannes M. Bauer Per Björstedt Erik Bohlin Elena Gallo Anders Henten Sven Lindmark Martijn Poel Enzo Pontarollo Knud Erik Skouby Jason Whalley Berlin, 2006 DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt 20 Johannes M. Bauer1 Per Björstedt2 Erik Bohlin2 Elena Gallo3 Anders Henten4 Sven Lindmark2 Martijn Poel5 Enzo Pontarollo6 Knud Erik Skouby7 Jason Whalley8 Pio Baake9, Brigitte Preissl (Editors) Local Loop Unbundling and Bitstream Access: Regulatory Practice in Europe and the U.S. Berlin, September 2006 1 Michigan State University, USA. [email protected] 2 Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden. Corresponding author: Erik Bohlin, [email protected] 3 Wind Telecomunicazioni, Italy. [email protected] 4 CICT, COM•DTU, Denmark. [email protected] 5 TNO Information and Communication Technology, The Netherlands. [email protected] 6 Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy. [email protected] 7 CICT, COM•DTU, Denmark. [email protected] 8 Strathclyde Business School, United Kingdom. [email protected] 9 DIW Berlin, Department Information Society and Competition. [email protected] IMPRESSUM © DIW Berlin, 2006 DIW Berlin Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Königin-Luise-Str. 5 14195 Berlin Tel. +49 (30) 897 89-0 Fax +49 (30) 897 89-200 www.diw.de ISBN 3-938762-10-1 ISSN 1614-6912 Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Abdruck oder vergleichbare Verwendung von Arbeiten des DIW Berlin ist auch in Auszügen nur mit vorheriger schriftlicher Genehmigung gestattet. DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt 20 Contents Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 2 From facility-based competition to equality of access: The Italian way ........................ 6 2.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 The different levels of LLU ......................................................................................... 9 2.2.1 Bitstream access............................................................................................... 9 2.2.2 Full LLU........................................................................................................ 11 2.2.2.1 Collocation...................................................................................... 13 2.2.2.2 LLU access charges........................................................................ 14 2.2.2.3 Shared access.................................................................................. 17 2.3 The relation between the pricing of different services............................................... 17 2.4 Delays in LLU implementation.................................................................................. 19 2.5 The Agcom’s market analysis.................................................................................... 21 2.6 Access bottlenecks and broadband diffusion ............................................................. 25 2.7 Some open questions: ladder of investment or equality of access? ........................... 28 2.8 References.................................................................................................................. 32 3 Regulation of local loop unbundling in the Netherlands: The regulatory strategy, the many difficulties and the impact on infrastructure and services competition......................................................................................................................... 34 3.1 Introduction and main points ..................................................................................... 34 3.1.1 Overview of the regulatory strategy .............................................................. 34 3.1.2 Main features of regulatory framework......................................................... 35 3.2 Regulation of access to the local loop........................................................................ 39 3.2.1 The EDC model and its application to LLU.................................................. 39 3.2.2 Unbundling obligations.................................................................................. 42 3.2.3 Regulatory provisions with specific dynamic aspects ................................... 43 3.2.4 Obligations with respect to the provision of collocation spaces.................... 44 3.3 Wholesale and resale obligations and the respective tariffs....................................... 45 3.3.1 Regulations with respect to consumer prices................................................. 45 3.3.1.1 The model used............................................................................... 45 3.3.1.2 The relation between regulated consumer prices and wholesale tariffs.............................................................................. 46 I DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt 20 Contents 3.4 Implementation of regulation..................................................................................... 47 3.4.1 Impediments of implementation: delays and deficiencies............................. 47 3.4.2 Litigation: appeal cases to regulator and court .............................................. 47 3.5 Performance indicators.............................................................................................. 48 3.5.1 Diffusion of broadband technology ............................................................... 48 3.5.2 Quality of access............................................................................................ 52 3.5.3 Division of market between incumbent and new entrants............................. 52 3.6 Conclusion and outlook............................................................................................. 56 3.7 References.................................................................................................................. 62 4 Regulation of local loop access – infrastructure versus service competition in fixed broadband access: The case of Denmark............................................................... 63 4.1 Introduction................................................................................................................ 63 4.2 Overview of the current regulatory philosophy ......................................................... 64 4.3 Main features of the regulatory framework ............................................................... 66 4.4 Regulation models and provisions ............................................................................. 68 4.5 Regulation of access to the local loop........................................................................ 69 4.5.1 The model used by the regulator to determine the access charges ................ 70 4.5.2 Unbundling obligations.................................................................................. 72 4.5.3 Regulatory provisions with specific dynamic aspects ................................... 73 4.5.4 Obligations with respect to the provision of collocation spaces.................... 75 4.6 Regulation of access to higher levels in the network, i.e. BSA ................................. 75 4.7 Wholesale and resale obligations and the respective tariffs....................................... 76 4.8 Regulation with respect to consumer prices .............................................................. 77 4.9 Implementation of regulatory rules...........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report & Accounts 1998
    Annual report and accounts 1998 Chairman’s statement The 1998 financial year proved to be a very Turnover has grown by 4.7 per cent and we important chapter in the BT story, even if not have seen strong growth in demand. Customers quite in the way we anticipated 12 months ago. have benefited from sound quality of service, price cuts worth over £750 million in the year, This time last year, we expected that there was a and a range of new and exciting services. Our good chance that our prospective merger with MCI Internet-related business is growing fast and we Communications Corporation would be completed are seeing considerable demand for second lines by the end of the calendar year. In the event, of and ISDN connections. We have also announced course, this did not happen. WorldCom tabled a a major upgrade to our broadband network to considerably higher bid for MCI and we did not match the ever-increasing volumes of data we feel that it would be in shareholders’ best interests are required to carry. to match it. Earnings per share were 26.7 pence and I am In our view, the preferable course was to pleased to report a final dividend for the year of accept the offer WorldCom made for our 20 per 11.45 pence per share, which brings the total cent holding in MCI. On completion of the dividend for the year to 19 pence per share, MCI/WorldCom merger, BT will receive around which is as forecast. This represents an increase US$7 billion (more than £4 billion).
    [Show full text]
  • What to Know and Where to Go
    What to Know and Where to Go A Practical Guide for International Students at the Faculty of Science CONTENT 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................8 2. WHO TO CONTACT? ................................................................................................................................................ 9 FULL-DEGREE STUDENTS: ......................................................................................................................................9 GUEST/EXCHANGE STUDENTS: ........................................................................................................................... 10 3. ACADEMIC CALENDAR AND TIMETABLE GROUPS .................................................................................... 13 NORMAL TEACHING BLOCKS ........................................................................................................................................ 13 GUIDANCE WEEK ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 THE SUMMER PERIOD ................................................................................................................................................... 13 THE 2009/2010 ACADEMIC YEAR ................................................................................................................................. 14 HOLIDAYS & PUBLIC
    [Show full text]
  • Network-Political Resiliency
    Network-Political Resiliency A Classification of Internet Resiliency by Country Chloe Reynolds & Saghar Tamaddon Network-Political Resiliency 2 Abstract Recent Internet disruptions in Libya, Egypt, Syria, Burma and Nepal beg the question, “How vulnerable is any country to an Internet access disruption by its government?” This paper seeks to answer that question by taking a look at both internet infrastructure and politics to create a „Network-Political Resiliency‟ (NPR) classification. The network infrastructure metric for each country is based on Roberts and Larochelle‟s (2010) number of „Points of Control‟ (POCs). POCs are the most influential Autonomous Systems (ASs) in a country‟s Internet network. Roberts and Larochelle determined the POCs based on a new AS relationship inference method, applied to data from The Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis (CAIDA). Three different political metrics are used, gathered from two sources: a) OpenNet Initiative‟s Political Internet Filtering score (see map in Appendix 2), b) OpenNet Initiative‟s overall Internet Filtering score, and c) Reporters Without Borders‟ Internet Enemies Report (see map in Appendix 3). The combination of these metrics results in a final NPR classification. In short, only a small portion of countries has a "high" NPR classification, and most fall into the low and very low resiliency categories. Given that Internet access is felt by many to be a matter of human rights, national NPR levels can be a red flag for concerned entities, such as human rights organizations. NPR ratings can also serve as a call for increasing network infrastructure. Network-Political Resiliency 3 Political Infrastructure of the Internet Proponents of open Internet access and net neutrality argue that unfiltered widely and freely available Internet access is a democratization tool (Reporters Without Borders, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • RIPE NCC Survey 2013: Full Statistics and Responses to Open Questions
    RIPE NCC Survey 2013 September 9, 2013 Appendix 3: Full Statistics and Responses to Open Questions RIPE NCC SURVEY 2013 Q1 Please choose your country Answered: 3,631 Skipped: 2 Answer Choices Responses Afghanistan 0.03% 1 Åland Islands 0.06% 2 Albania 0.52% 19 Algeria 0.03% 1 American Samoa 0% 0 Andorra 0.08% 3 Angola 0% 0 Anguilla 0% 0 Antarctica 0% 0 Antigua and Barbuda 0% 0 Argentina 0.06% 2 Armenia 0.22% 8 Aruba 0% 0 Australia 0.25% 9 Austria 2.09% 76 Azerbaijan 0.14% 5 Bahamas 0% 0 Bahrain 0.22% 8 Bangladesh 0.08% 3 Barbados 0% 0 Belarus 0.25% 9 Belgium 1.51% 55 Belize 0% 0 Benin 0% 0 Bermuda 0.03% 1 Bhutan 0.03% 1 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0% 0 Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba 0% 0 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.41% 15 Botswana 0% 0 Bouvet Island 0% 0 Brazil 0.08% 3 British Indian Ocean Territory 0% 0 Brunei Darussalam 0% 0 Bulgaria 1.05% 38 Burkina Faso 0% 0 Burundi 0% 0 1 / 231 RIPE NCC SURVEY 2013 0% 0 Cambodia Cameroon 0% 0 Canada 0.33% 12 Cape Verde 0% 0 Cayman Islands 0% 0 Central African Republic 0% 0 Chad 0% 0 Chile 0.06% 2 China 0.11% 4 Christmas Island 0% 0 Cocos (Keeling) Islands 0% 0 Colombia 0.03% 1 Comoros 0% 0 Congo 0% 0 Congo, the Democratic Republic of the 0% 0 Cook Islands 0% 0 Costa Rica 0% 0 Côte d'Ivoire 0% 0 Croatia 0.63% 23 Cuba 0% 0 Curaçao 0% 0 Cyprus 0.19% 7 Czech Republic 2.64% 96 Denmark 1.96% 71 Djibouti 0% 0 Dominica 0% 0 Dominican Republic 0% 0 Ecuador 0.03% 1 Egypt 0.11% 4 El Salvador 0% 0 Equatorial Guinea 0% 0 Eritrea 0% 0 Estonia 0.47% 17 Ethiopia 0% 0 Falkland Islands (Malvinas) 0% 0 Faroe Islands
    [Show full text]
  • A Webarchiválás Válogatott Bibliográfiája Összefoglalókkal
    A webarchiválás válogatott bibliográfiája összefoglalókkal Szerkeszti: Németh Márton <[email protected]> Frissítés dátuma: 2018.09.11. Beinert, T. (2017). Webarchivierung an der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek. (German). Web Archiving at the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek. (English) , 51 (6), 490. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,cookie,cpid&custid=s6213251&gro upid=main&profile=eds The Bayerische Staatsbibliothek has been collecting and archiving websites dealing with regional studies and science since the year 2010. The article provides a survey of the collection and archiving profiles of the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek concerning websites, the legal basis, the workflow which has been developed as well as the registration and making available of websites in the archives. Finally, further perspectives for the future are presented. (English) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Boruna, A. E., & Rahme, N. (2011). Arhivarea paginilor Web – ini ţiative relevante de păstrare a patrimoniului digital european. Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei. Informare si Documentare , 4, 39–52,. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1443688144?accountid=27464 Brakker, N. V., & Kujbyshev, L. A. (2013). The Experience of the National Libraries Abroad of the Collection and Longterm Preservation of Internet Resources. Bibliotekovedenie [Library and Information Science (Russia)] , (2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.25281/0869- 608X-2013-0-2-88-96 A review of National Libraries experience of WEB harvesting, archiving technologies and legal issues. The paper suggests an overlook of experience and experiments of National Libraries of Austria, Germany, China, Lithuania, the Netherlands, New Zeeland, Northway, Portugal, United Kingdom, USA, Finland, France, Czech Republic and Sweden. Buel, J. W. (2018). Assembling the Living Archive: A Media-Archaeological Excavation of Occupy Wall Street.
    [Show full text]
  • 11583/12 ADD 3 HVW/Ek 1 DG E 2B COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 19 June 2012 THE EUROPEAN UNION 11583/12 ADD 2 TELECOM 129 AUDIO 67 COMPET 455 RECH 293 MI 445 ENER 322 DATAPROTECT 79 COVER NOTE from: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director date of receipt: 18 June 2012 to: Mr Uwe CORSEPIUS, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Unio n No Cion doc.: SWD(2012) 180 final Subject: COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT "DAE - Scoreboard 2012" (Vol 3/6) Delegations will find attached Commission document SWD(2012) 180 final. (Vol. 3/6) ________________________ Enc l. : SWD(2012) 180 final 11583/12 ADD 3 HVW/ek 1 DG E 2B EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 18.6.2012 SWD(2012) 180 final Vol. 3/6 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT DAE-Scoreboard 2012 EN EN COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT DAE-Scoreboard 2012 EN 2 EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information Society and Media Directorate-General Elec tronic Communications Policy Implementation of Regulatory Framework 18 June 2012 EUROPEAN UNION 2011 Telecommunication Market and Regulatory Developments EN 3 EN This report is a Commission Services working document, issued as part of the Scoreboard 2012: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/digital-agenda/scoreboard/ Address : Commission européenne / Europes e Commissie, B-1049 Bruxelles / Brussel Email : [email protected] EN 4 EN 2011 Telecommunications Market & Regulatory Developments TABLE OF CONTENT 1. STATE OF TR ANSPOSITION OF THE R EVISED EU FR AMEWORK ________ 7 2. NATIONAL REGULATORY AUTHORITIES (NRA) __________________________ 9 2.1. Independence and organisation __________________________________________ 9 2.2. Resources and capacity/administrative charges ____________________________ 10 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/CISP(2009)9/FINAL
    Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/CISP(2009)9/FINAL Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 23-Mar-2010 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY COMMITTEE FOR INFORMATION, COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS POLICY Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/CISP(2009)9/FINAL Working Party on Communication Infrastructures and Services Policy DEVELOPMENTS IN CABLE BROADBAND NETWORKS English - Or. English JT03280592 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format DSTI\ICCP\CISP(2009)9/FINAL FOREWORD The Working Party on Communication Infrastructures and Services Policy (CISP) discussed this report at its meeting in December 2009. CISP agreed to forward the document for declassification by the Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy (ICCP). The ICCP Committee agreed to make the report public in March 2010. The report was prepared by Mr. Hyun-Cheol CHUNG of the OECD’s Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. It is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. © OECD 2010/OCDE 2010 2 DSTI\ICCP\CISP(2009)9/FINAL MAIN FINDINGS The position of cable operators within the pay TV market has changed drastically in recent years. Although video service remains core to the cable industry’s business model, cable TV’s market share has been dropping significantly with intense competition from direct broadcast satellite services (DBS), Internet protocol Television (IPTV) services, digital terrestrial television services (DTT) and finally from over-the-top (OTT) service providers that supply video over an existing data connection from a third party.
    [Show full text]
  • Diffusion and Impacts of the Internet and E-Commerce: the Case of Denmark
    Diffusion and Impacts of the Internet and E-Commerce: The Case of Denmark August 2004 NIELS BJØRN-ANDERSEN KIM VIBORG ANDERSEN Center for E-Commerce Copenhagen Business School, Denmark E-mail: {nba, andersen}@cbs.dk Please refer all correspondence about this paper to [email protected] This research is a part of the Globalization and E-Commerce project of the Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations (CRITO) at the University of California, Irvine. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0085852. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. ______________________________________________________________________________ Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations University of California, Irvine | www.crito.uci.edu ABSTRACT Danish companies are ahead of those in the U.S. in B2C e-commerce. With the exception of Germany, Denmark is leading the group of 10 countries included in the globalization of e- commerce survey data, forming the basis for this report. Yet the surveyed countries are performing substantially better than Denmark in B2B online sales. Danish companies have high levels of investment in IT, the lowest barriers for e-commerce, and the highest levels of e-commerce drivers. Most indicators for e-commerce readiness, such as use of e-mail, intranet, EDI, extranet, and the provision of mobile services, show that the Danish business sector has adopted the technologies that foster e-commerce development. Yet our analysis also points to several alarming and surprising findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Rights Issue Prospectus THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT and REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION
    Rights Issue Prospectus THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. When considering what action you should take, you should seek your own personal ¢nancial advice immediately from your stockbroker, bank, solicitor, accountant, fund manager or other appropriate ¢nancial adviser authorised under the Financial Services Act 1986. Cazenove and Merrill Lynch, each of which is regulated in the United Kingdom by the Securities and Futures Authority Limited, are acting exclusively for BT and for no-one else in connection with the Rights Issue and will not be responsible to anyone other than BT for providing the protections a¡orded to their customers or for providing advice in relation to the Rights Issue or the contents of this document. If you sell or have sold or otherwise transferred all of your existing BT Shares (other than ex-rights) in certi¢cated form before 21 May 2001 (the ‘‘ex-rights date’’), please send this document, together with any accompanying Provisional Allotment Letter, at once to the purchaser or transferee or to the bank, stockbroker or other agent through whom you sell or have sold or transferred your shares for delivery to the purchaser or transferee. If your transferred BT Shares were held in uncerti¢cated form, a claim transaction will automatically be generated by CRESTCo which, on settlement, will transfer the appropriate number of Nil Paid Rights to the purchaser or transferee. The distribution of this document and/or the accompanying documents, and/or the transfer of Nil Paid Rights or Fully Paid Rights through CREST in jurisdictions other than the UK may be restricted by law and therefore persons into whose possession this document comes should inform themselves about and observe any of those restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Implications of Internet Filtering
    Law Faculty August 2010 Legal Implications ofn Internet European Filtering Law LLM Dissertation Peter A. Craddock Supervisor: K. Madders LLM specialism: Regulation & Technology Page 1/1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction! 1 I. Historical, technical and factual analysis of Internet filtering! 2 1. The Yahoo! case, an international debut for !lters 2 2. Internet !ltering typology 3 2.1. Filtering methods 3 2.2. Level of deployment 4 2.3. Resources targeted 5 2.4. Interaction with Internet tra"c 6 3. Internet !ltering worldwide 6 3.1. Filters imposed by the State 6 3.2. Voluntary or State-encouraged ISP-level !lters 11 3.3. Company, library, school and home !ltering 13 II. Legal analysis of filters! 15 1. Freedom of expression 15 1.1. Applicability of the right to freedom of expression 16 1.2. ‘Prescribed by law’ 18 (i) Law 18 (ii) Accessibility 20 (iii) Foreseeability 21 1.3. ‘Necessary in a democratic society’ 21 (i) ‘Pressing social need’ 22 (ii) ‘Relevant and su!cient’ 23 (iii) ‘Proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued’ 24 a) ‘Appropriate and necessary’ 24 b) ‘Least onerous’ 26 Table of Contents 2. Liability 27 2.1. Exclusion of liability 27 2.2. Prohibition of any general obligation to monitor 29 2.3. Liability for removal of legitimate content 30 3. Privacy and data processing 31 4. Legitimacy in governance: transparency 31 III. Filters mindful of the law! 34 1. Freedom of expression 34 1.1. ‘Prescribed by law’ 34 1.2. ‘Necessary in a democratic society’ 34 2. Liability 35 3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Webarchiválás Elméletének És Gyakorlatának Alapelemei a Szervezett Keretek Között Zajló Webarchiválás Kezdetei Magyarországon
    A webarchiválás elméletének és gyakorlatának alapelemei A szervezett keretek között zajló webarchiválás kezdetei Magyarországon Egyetemi doktori (PhD) értekezés a szerző neve: Németh Márton témavezető neve: Eszenyiné dr. Borbély Mária DEBRECENI EGYETEM Természettudományi és Informatikai Doktori Tanács Informatikai Tudományok Doktori Iskola Debrecen, 2021. 1 Ezen értekezést a Debreceni Egyetem Természettudományi és Informatikai Doktori Tanács Informatikai Tudományok Doktori Iskola Az információ technológia és a sztochasztikus rendszerek elméleti alapjai és alkalmazásai programja keretében készítettem a Debreceni Egyetem műszaki doktori (PhD) fokozatának elnyerése céljából. Nyilatkozom arról, hogy a tézisekben leírt eredmények nem képezik más PhD disszertáció részét. Debrecen, 2021. június 1. …………………….. Németh Márton Tanúsítom, hogy Németh Márton doktorjelölt 2015.- 2021 között a fent megnevezett Doktori Iskola Az információ technológia és a sztochasztikus rendszerek elméleti alapjai és alkalmazásai programjának keretében irányításommal végezte munkáját. Az értekezésben foglalt eredményekhez a jelölt önálló alkotó tevékenységével meghatározóan hozzájárult. Nyilatkozom továbbá arról, hogy a tézisekben leírt eredmények nem képezik más PhD disszertáció részét. Az értekezés elfogadását javasolom. Debrecen, 2021. június 1. …………………………. Eszenyiné dr. Borbély Mária A webarchiválás elméletének és gyakorlatának alapelemei A szervezett keretek között zajló webarchiválás kezdetei Magyarországon Értekezés a doktori (PhD) fokozat megszerzése érdekében
    [Show full text]
  • British Telecom 기업 프로필 2005
    British Telecom 기업 프로필 2005 2005년 11월 Mindbranch Asia Pacific BT 1. 기업 개요 BT는 유럽, 미주, 아시아 태평양 지역에서 커뮤니케이션 솔루션을 제공하고 있는 세계 최대 규모의 통신 사업자임. BT의 사업은 네트워크 기반의 IT 서비스, 로컬 및 국제 전화사업, 고 부가가치 광대역 통신망 등 매우 광범위 함. 영국에서 BT는 2천만의 기업 및 개인 고객들 에게 2,900만의 회선을 통해 서비스를 제공하고 있음 BT 는 1981 년 우체국에서 GPO(General Post Office)가 분리되면서 설립되었음. 국영기업이 었던 BT 는 1984년 공적 주식회사로 변경되었다가, 지금은 완전 상장 주식회사가 되었음 거의 독점적으로 유선통신 사업을 운영해오던 BT는 Mercury Communications가 설립되면서 처음으로 경쟁구도가 생겼고, 1991 년 영국 통신 시장이 완전 개방되면서 시장은 본격 경쟁 체제로 돌입하였음. 이러한 경쟁체제에서 살아남기 위해 BT는 2000년 무선 통신 사업 분야 인 mm02 와 directory 출판 부문인 Yell 을 계열 분리했음 BT의 세계시장 진출은 2002 년 초에 전략적 파트너로 AT&T 와 조인트 벤처 계약을 체결 하면서 부터였음. 그러나 글로벌 통신 사업이 경쟁심화로, BT 는 유럽과 아시아를 걸쳐 많 은 설비 및 마케팅 비용을 감당해야 했고, 3G 사업권 취득과 관련해서도 많은 자금을 투자 하며 부채를 대량 양산하게 되었으며, 결국 파트너 관계가 2002년 4월 부로 종료되고, Yell 과 BT Wireless 등을 매각하기에 이르렀음 그러나, BT 는 2002 년 4 월 경영진을 교체하면서 구조조정을 단행, BT Openworld 부문을 BT Retail 부문으로 통합, BT Ignite 를 BT Global Service 로 변경등 많은 변화를 시도한 끝에, 현재는 BT Retail, BT Wholesale, BT Global Service, BT Exact 등 네개의 사업부를 운영하고 있음 <표 1> BT의 주요 연혁 연도 주요 활동 · 법개정에 따라 Post Office 와 통신 부문은 분리되고, 통신부문은 1981 British Telecommunications 으로 사명 변경 · 정부에서 Mercury Communications에 경쟁 허용 1984 · 통신법 1984 에 의해 민영화 · Securicor 와 함께 Joint Venture 인 Cellnet 설립 후, Cellular 1985 Telephone 서비스 개시 · 정부는 GSM 900용 주파수를 Cellnet과 Racal Vodafone에 1991년 1987 까지 제공 1991 · 정부의 BT지분 21.8%까지 축소 · 정부 BT 남은 지분 매각.
    [Show full text]