A Webarchiválás Elméletének És Gyakorlatának Alapelemei a Szervezett Keretek Között Zajló Webarchiválás Kezdetei Magyarországon

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Webarchiválás Elméletének És Gyakorlatának Alapelemei a Szervezett Keretek Között Zajló Webarchiválás Kezdetei Magyarországon A webarchiválás elméletének és gyakorlatának alapelemei A szervezett keretek között zajló webarchiválás kezdetei Magyarországon Egyetemi doktori (PhD) értekezés a szerző neve: Németh Márton témavezető neve: Eszenyiné dr. Borbély Mária DEBRECENI EGYETEM Természettudományi és Informatikai Doktori Tanács Informatikai Tudományok Doktori Iskola Debrecen, 2021. 1 Ezen értekezést a Debreceni Egyetem Természettudományi és Informatikai Doktori Tanács Informatikai Tudományok Doktori Iskola Az információ technológia és a sztochasztikus rendszerek elméleti alapjai és alkalmazásai programja keretében készítettem a Debreceni Egyetem műszaki doktori (PhD) fokozatának elnyerése céljából. Nyilatkozom arról, hogy a tézisekben leírt eredmények nem képezik más PhD disszertáció részét. Debrecen, 2021. június 1. …………………….. Németh Márton Tanúsítom, hogy Németh Márton doktorjelölt 2015.- 2021 között a fent megnevezett Doktori Iskola Az információ technológia és a sztochasztikus rendszerek elméleti alapjai és alkalmazásai programjának keretében irányításommal végezte munkáját. Az értekezésben foglalt eredményekhez a jelölt önálló alkotó tevékenységével meghatározóan hozzájárult. Nyilatkozom továbbá arról, hogy a tézisekben leírt eredmények nem képezik más PhD disszertáció részét. Az értekezés elfogadását javasolom. Debrecen, 2021. június 1. …………………………. Eszenyiné dr. Borbély Mária A webarchiválás elméletének és gyakorlatának alapelemei A szervezett keretek között zajló webarchiválás kezdetei Magyarországon Értekezés a doktori (PhD) fokozat megszerzése érdekében az Informatikai technológiák tudományágban Írta: Németh Márton okleveles informatikus könyvtáros szakos bölcsész – történelem szakos bölcsész és tanár Készült a Debreceni Egyetem Informatikai Tudományok doktori iskolája (Az információ technológia és a sztochasztikus rendszerek elméleti alapjai és alkalmazásai programja) keretében Témavezető: Eszenyiné dr. Borbély Mária A doktori szigorlati bizottság: elnök: Dr. Hajdu András habil. egyetemi tanár tagok: Dr. Varga Katalin habil. egyetemi docens Dr. Adamkó Attila habil. egyetemi docens Az értekezés bírálói: Dr. ............................................. ............................................ Dr. ............................................. ............................................ A bírálóbizottság: elnök: Dr. ............................................. ............................................ tagok: Dr. ............................................. ............................................ Dr. ............................................. ............................................ Dr. .............................................. ............................................ Dr. ............................................. ............................................ Az értekezés védésének időpontja: Tartalom Bevezetés .............................................................................................................. 5 A témaválasztás indokai .................................................................................... 7 A disszertáció tartalmi szerkezetének főbb elemei ......................................... 10 A számítógépes világháló természete, a webarchiválás eredendő töredék alapú szubjektivitása ....................................................................................... 13 A web technikai fejlődésének kihívása ............................................................ 14 A világháló természetéből fakadó közgyűjteményi archiválási dilemmák ...... 19 1. A webarchiválás közgyűjteményi keretei .................................................... 24 1.1 A webarchiválás a digitális könyvtári szolgáltatások rendszerében .... 28 1.2 A webarchiválás mint digitális levéltári feladat ................................... 32 1.3 A webarchiválás digitális muzeológiai vonatkozásai ........................... 35 1.4 Az audiovizuális archívumok és a webarchiválás ................................ 37 2. A webarchiválás nemzetközi háttere .......................................................... 39 2.1 A webarchiválás főbb nemzetközi intézményi szereplői és az együttműködés keretei ................................................................................... 40 2.2 A webarchiválás különféle nemzeti gyakorlatai – esettanulmányok ........ 44 PANDORA: Az ausztrál webarchiválás modellje .......................................... 46 Webarchiválás Nagy-Britanniában .............................................................. 49 Netarkivet.dk – dán webarchívum gyűjtőkör és szervezeti keretek ........... 51 Webarchiválás Csehországban .................................................................... 55 Webarchiválás Szlovákiában ....................................................................... 57 Webarchiválás Észtországban ..................................................................... 59 Webarchiválás Hollandiában ....................................................................... 61 A nemzetközi áttekintés tanulságai............................................................. 62 2.3. Magyar részvétel a nemzetközi együttműködésekben ............................ 63 3. A magyarországi webarchiválás kísérleti projektje – a szervezett webarchiválás kezdetei ....................................................................................... 69 3.1 Előzmények ......................................................................................... 70 3.2 A kísérleti projekt eredeti koncepciója ............................................... 74 3.3 A webarchiválás munkafolyamatainak áttekintése ............................. 81 3.3.1 Az általános webarchiválás keretei .................................................... 81 3.3.3 Webhelyek válogatásának alapelvei a szelektív webarchiváláshoz ... 86 3.3.4 Eseményalapú webarchiválás ............................................................ 91 3.4 A gyűjtőkör, a gyűjteményfejlesztés alapvető kereteinek tervezete ........ 94 3.4.1 Alapelvek ............................................................................................ 95 3.4.2 Az elektronikus hungarikumok gyűjtőköre ........................................ 98 3.4.3 Az online kiadványtípusok gyűjtőköre ............................................... 98 3.4.4 A könyvtári gyűjtőkör lehatárolása, együttműködés külső intézményi partnerekkel .............................................................................................. 101 3.5 A kísérleti projekt hardver és szoftver háttere.................................. 101 3.5.1 A hardver infrastruktúra elemei ....................................................... 102 3.5.2 A webarchiválási kísérleti projekt szoftveres háttere ...................... 107 3.6 A metaadatok rögzítése .................................................................... 135 3.6.1 A saját metaadat-struktúra kialakításának kezdő lépései ................ 136 3.6.2 Az RDA kompatibilis metaadatmodell megteremtésének első lépései ................................................................................................................... 141 3.7 Minőségellenőrzés, a webarchiválás határai .................................... 148 3.7.1 A webarchiválás határai ................................................................... 148 3.7.2 Minőség-ellenőrzés .......................................................................... 151 Összefoglaló gondolatok a minőség-ellenőrzésről .................................... 157 3.8 Raktározás, a hosszútávú megőrzés kihívásai ......................................... 158 3.9 Jogi szabályozási szükségletek és kísérletek ............................................ 160 3.9.1 A webarchiválás szerzői jogi kihívásai, jogkezelési eljárások ........... 160 3.9.2 A webarchiválási tevékenység szabályozásának törvényi, jogszabályi háttere ....................................................................................................... 165 3.10 Az OSZK webarchiválási tevékenységének kommunikációs keretei ..... 168 3.10.1 A honlap felépítése és alapvető szolgáltatásai ............................... 169 2 3.10.2 A webarchívum mint gyűjtemény .................................................. 173 3.10.3 A webarchiválási projekt szakmai és szervezeti keretei ................. 175 3.10.4 Általános felhasználói információk ................................................ 176 3.10.5 Kínálatunk a tartalomgazdáknak .................................................... 176 3.10.6 A közgyűjteményi szakmának ajánlott szolgáltatások ................... 177 3.10.7 A külső kommunikáció keretei ....................................................... 179 3.11 Együttműködések partnerintézményekkel ........................................... 179 3.12 A jövőre vonatkozó tervek .................................................................... 181 4 A webarchiválás oktatása .......................................................................... 182 4.1 Az oktatási tevékenységek nemzetközi háttere ................................ 183 4.1.1 A NETLAB kutatócsoport e-learning programja ........................ 184 4.1.2 Az IIPC Training Working Group tevékenysége ......................... 187 4.2 A Könyvtári Intézettel közösen kidolgozott blended learning koncepció ...................................................................................................... 194 4.3 Jövőbeni oktatási tervek .................................................................... 200 5 A webarchívumok tudományos hasznosításának keretei
Recommended publications
  • What to Know and Where to Go
    What to Know and Where to Go A Practical Guide for International Students at the Faculty of Science CONTENT 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................8 2. WHO TO CONTACT? ................................................................................................................................................ 9 FULL-DEGREE STUDENTS: ......................................................................................................................................9 GUEST/EXCHANGE STUDENTS: ........................................................................................................................... 10 3. ACADEMIC CALENDAR AND TIMETABLE GROUPS .................................................................................... 13 NORMAL TEACHING BLOCKS ........................................................................................................................................ 13 GUIDANCE WEEK ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 THE SUMMER PERIOD ................................................................................................................................................... 13 THE 2009/2010 ACADEMIC YEAR ................................................................................................................................. 14 HOLIDAYS & PUBLIC
    [Show full text]
  • Network-Political Resiliency
    Network-Political Resiliency A Classification of Internet Resiliency by Country Chloe Reynolds & Saghar Tamaddon Network-Political Resiliency 2 Abstract Recent Internet disruptions in Libya, Egypt, Syria, Burma and Nepal beg the question, “How vulnerable is any country to an Internet access disruption by its government?” This paper seeks to answer that question by taking a look at both internet infrastructure and politics to create a „Network-Political Resiliency‟ (NPR) classification. The network infrastructure metric for each country is based on Roberts and Larochelle‟s (2010) number of „Points of Control‟ (POCs). POCs are the most influential Autonomous Systems (ASs) in a country‟s Internet network. Roberts and Larochelle determined the POCs based on a new AS relationship inference method, applied to data from The Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis (CAIDA). Three different political metrics are used, gathered from two sources: a) OpenNet Initiative‟s Political Internet Filtering score (see map in Appendix 2), b) OpenNet Initiative‟s overall Internet Filtering score, and c) Reporters Without Borders‟ Internet Enemies Report (see map in Appendix 3). The combination of these metrics results in a final NPR classification. In short, only a small portion of countries has a "high" NPR classification, and most fall into the low and very low resiliency categories. Given that Internet access is felt by many to be a matter of human rights, national NPR levels can be a red flag for concerned entities, such as human rights organizations. NPR ratings can also serve as a call for increasing network infrastructure. Network-Political Resiliency 3 Political Infrastructure of the Internet Proponents of open Internet access and net neutrality argue that unfiltered widely and freely available Internet access is a democratization tool (Reporters Without Borders, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • RIPE NCC Survey 2013: Full Statistics and Responses to Open Questions
    RIPE NCC Survey 2013 September 9, 2013 Appendix 3: Full Statistics and Responses to Open Questions RIPE NCC SURVEY 2013 Q1 Please choose your country Answered: 3,631 Skipped: 2 Answer Choices Responses Afghanistan 0.03% 1 Åland Islands 0.06% 2 Albania 0.52% 19 Algeria 0.03% 1 American Samoa 0% 0 Andorra 0.08% 3 Angola 0% 0 Anguilla 0% 0 Antarctica 0% 0 Antigua and Barbuda 0% 0 Argentina 0.06% 2 Armenia 0.22% 8 Aruba 0% 0 Australia 0.25% 9 Austria 2.09% 76 Azerbaijan 0.14% 5 Bahamas 0% 0 Bahrain 0.22% 8 Bangladesh 0.08% 3 Barbados 0% 0 Belarus 0.25% 9 Belgium 1.51% 55 Belize 0% 0 Benin 0% 0 Bermuda 0.03% 1 Bhutan 0.03% 1 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0% 0 Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba 0% 0 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.41% 15 Botswana 0% 0 Bouvet Island 0% 0 Brazil 0.08% 3 British Indian Ocean Territory 0% 0 Brunei Darussalam 0% 0 Bulgaria 1.05% 38 Burkina Faso 0% 0 Burundi 0% 0 1 / 231 RIPE NCC SURVEY 2013 0% 0 Cambodia Cameroon 0% 0 Canada 0.33% 12 Cape Verde 0% 0 Cayman Islands 0% 0 Central African Republic 0% 0 Chad 0% 0 Chile 0.06% 2 China 0.11% 4 Christmas Island 0% 0 Cocos (Keeling) Islands 0% 0 Colombia 0.03% 1 Comoros 0% 0 Congo 0% 0 Congo, the Democratic Republic of the 0% 0 Cook Islands 0% 0 Costa Rica 0% 0 Côte d'Ivoire 0% 0 Croatia 0.63% 23 Cuba 0% 0 Curaçao 0% 0 Cyprus 0.19% 7 Czech Republic 2.64% 96 Denmark 1.96% 71 Djibouti 0% 0 Dominica 0% 0 Dominican Republic 0% 0 Ecuador 0.03% 1 Egypt 0.11% 4 El Salvador 0% 0 Equatorial Guinea 0% 0 Eritrea 0% 0 Estonia 0.47% 17 Ethiopia 0% 0 Falkland Islands (Malvinas) 0% 0 Faroe Islands
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report to Partners 2016-2017
    Annual report to partners 2016-2017 Contents 1. PANDORA Participants working together 1.1 Consultation mechanisms 1.2 Reports 1.3 Adding value – notable collections 2. Growth of the PANDORA Archive 2.1 Size and annual growth of the PANDORA Archive 2.2 Statistics for annual participant contributions 3. Development of the Web Archive 3.1 Development of the ‘Trove web archive’ zone 3.2 Australian web domain harvest 3.3 Collecting Commonwealth Government online publications 4. Focus on users 4.1 User views of the PANDORA Archive 4.2 User views of the Australian Government Web Archive 4.3 Most viewed titles (websites) in the PANDORA Archive 5. Promoting the Archive 5.1 Presentations, representations and papers 5.2 Social media 6. Concluding summary 1 1. PANDORA participants working together PANDORA, Australia’s Web Archive (http://pandora.nla.gov.au/) is a selective archive of Australian online publications and websites which is built collaboratively by the National Library of Australia, all of the mainland state libraries, the Australian War Memorial, the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) and the National Gallery of Australia. This report to contributing participants on activities and developments in the 2016- 2017 financial year is provided in accordance with the National Library’s obligation as stated in section 6.2 (k) of the Memorandum of Understand with participant agencies. 1.1 Consultation mechanisms The National Library continued to inform other PANDORA participants about the operation of PANDORA through an email discussion list, the PANDORA Wiki and a semi-regular newsletter distributed through email and the Wiki.
    [Show full text]
  • A Webarchiválás Válogatott Bibliográfiája Összefoglalókkal
    A webarchiválás válogatott bibliográfiája összefoglalókkal Szerkeszti: Németh Márton <[email protected]> Frissítés dátuma: 2018.09.11. Beinert, T. (2017). Webarchivierung an der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek. (German). Web Archiving at the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek. (English) , 51 (6), 490. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,cookie,cpid&custid=s6213251&gro upid=main&profile=eds The Bayerische Staatsbibliothek has been collecting and archiving websites dealing with regional studies and science since the year 2010. The article provides a survey of the collection and archiving profiles of the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek concerning websites, the legal basis, the workflow which has been developed as well as the registration and making available of websites in the archives. Finally, further perspectives for the future are presented. (English) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Boruna, A. E., & Rahme, N. (2011). Arhivarea paginilor Web – ini ţiative relevante de păstrare a patrimoniului digital european. Biblioteca Nationala a Romaniei. Informare si Documentare , 4, 39–52,. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1443688144?accountid=27464 Brakker, N. V., & Kujbyshev, L. A. (2013). The Experience of the National Libraries Abroad of the Collection and Longterm Preservation of Internet Resources. Bibliotekovedenie [Library and Information Science (Russia)] , (2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.25281/0869- 608X-2013-0-2-88-96 A review of National Libraries experience of WEB harvesting, archiving technologies and legal issues. The paper suggests an overlook of experience and experiments of National Libraries of Austria, Germany, China, Lithuania, the Netherlands, New Zeeland, Northway, Portugal, United Kingdom, USA, Finland, France, Czech Republic and Sweden. Buel, J. W. (2018). Assembling the Living Archive: A Media-Archaeological Excavation of Occupy Wall Street.
    [Show full text]
  • 11583/12 ADD 3 HVW/Ek 1 DG E 2B COUNCIL of the EUROPEAN
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 19 June 2012 THE EUROPEAN UNION 11583/12 ADD 2 TELECOM 129 AUDIO 67 COMPET 455 RECH 293 MI 445 ENER 322 DATAPROTECT 79 COVER NOTE from: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director date of receipt: 18 June 2012 to: Mr Uwe CORSEPIUS, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Unio n No Cion doc.: SWD(2012) 180 final Subject: COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT "DAE - Scoreboard 2012" (Vol 3/6) Delegations will find attached Commission document SWD(2012) 180 final. (Vol. 3/6) ________________________ Enc l. : SWD(2012) 180 final 11583/12 ADD 3 HVW/ek 1 DG E 2B EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 18.6.2012 SWD(2012) 180 final Vol. 3/6 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT DAE-Scoreboard 2012 EN EN COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT DAE-Scoreboard 2012 EN 2 EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information Society and Media Directorate-General Elec tronic Communications Policy Implementation of Regulatory Framework 18 June 2012 EUROPEAN UNION 2011 Telecommunication Market and Regulatory Developments EN 3 EN This report is a Commission Services working document, issued as part of the Scoreboard 2012: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/digital-agenda/scoreboard/ Address : Commission européenne / Europes e Commissie, B-1049 Bruxelles / Brussel Email : [email protected] EN 4 EN 2011 Telecommunications Market & Regulatory Developments TABLE OF CONTENT 1. STATE OF TR ANSPOSITION OF THE R EVISED EU FR AMEWORK ________ 7 2. NATIONAL REGULATORY AUTHORITIES (NRA) __________________________ 9 2.1. Independence and organisation __________________________________________ 9 2.2. Resources and capacity/administrative charges ____________________________ 10 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Challenges and Innovation for National Web Archiving
    Operational Challenges and Innovation for National Web Archiving Paul Koerbin1 Abstract This paper takes a long-view perspective of the interaction of innovation and operational objectives in the development of a national web archiving program at the National Library of Australia. In looking at this program over its twenty year history it is possible to discern an approach that is based on pragmatic outcomes strategically focused on operational workflows and access. While this approach has served the Library in developing and sustaining one of the earliest and longest active web archiving programs in the world, early successful outcomes have also produced longer term implications and constraints for keeping the program vital and fit for the purpose of collecting content from a dynamic, changing and expanding web. This paper covers developments in the three pillars of web archiving – collecting, preservation and access – as well as issues associated with bringing substantial legacy data into a program focused on the future. It suggests that a pragmatic and operational focused program remains a viable context for innovation. Introduction It is a notable fact that the systematic archiving of the World Wide Web (the web) – or more precisely selective parts of the web – has now been underway for more than twenty years. Moreover, programs taking on the task of preserving the material published on the web were established a mere five years or so after the appearance 1 Assistant Director Web Archiving and Government Publications, National Library of Australia. 1 of the web itself as a public medium2. The establishment of strategic programs to preserve access to the web should, per se, be recognised as a significant innovation particularly in the context of the library world.
    [Show full text]
  • NLA Pandora Factsheet
    PANDORA, AUSTRALIA’S WEB ARCHIVE ACCESS http://pandora.nla.gov.au/ Titles in the Archive are accessible free of charge via is a selective archive containing copies of the Internet at http://pandora.nla.gov.au/ Most titles significant Australian online publications and are available to anyone, anywhere in the world, with an Internet connection. Access is restricted to a very web sites issued on the Internet. The National small proportion of titles, mainly for commercial Library of Australia and its partners are reasons, and these can be viewed on a single PC in building the Archive to ensure long-term the Library’s Main Reading Room. access to significant Australian documentary People can find out about titles that are in the Archive heritage that is published online. by searching partners’ online catalogues or by searching the National Bibliographic Database PANDORA was placed on the Memory of the (Libraries Australia). Access is provided via hotlinks in World Australian Register in August 2004. the catalogue record to the title in the Archive. Access is also available via subject and title lists on the PANDORA Web Site. Full-text searching is available PARTICIPANT AGENCIES using the Library’s single search discovery service Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Trove. Commercial search engines, such as Google Islander Studies and Yahoo!, index the Archive down to the level of Australian War Memorial individual titles, but not the Archive contents. National Film and Sound Archive National Library of Australia QUALITY ASSURANCE Northern Territory Library Significant effort is invested in ensuring the authenticity State Library of New South Wales and integrity of each title archived.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report to Partners 2019-2020
    Annual report to partners 2019-2020 Contents 1. PANDORA Participants working together 1.1 Consultation mechanisms 1.2 Reports 1.3 Notable PANDORA collections 2. Growth of the Web Archive 2.1 Size and annual growth of the PANDORA Archive 2.2 Statistics for annual participant contributions 3. Analysis 3.1 Individual partner contribution trends over the life of the archive 4. Development of the Web Archive 4.1 Development of PANDAS and tools supporting partners 4.2 The Australian Web Archive 4.3 Australian web domain harvest 4.4 Collecting Commonwealth Government online publications 5. Focus on users 5.1 User views of the PANDORA Archive 5.2 Most viewed titles (websites) and collections in the PANDORA Archive 6. International relations 6.1 International Internet Preservation Consortium (IIPC) 7. Promoting the Archive 7.1 Presentations, representations and papers 7.2 Social media 1 1. PANDORA participants working together PANDORA, refers to the collaborative selective web archiving program led by the National Library of Australia (NLA) with participating agencies: the state libraries of Victoria (SLV), New South Wales (SLNSW), Queensland (SLQ), South Australia (SLSA) and Western Australia (SLWA), the Library & Archives NT (LANT), the Australian War Memorial (AWM), the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) and the National Gallery of Australia NGA). This report to contributing participants on activities and developments in the 2019-2020 financial year is made available in accordance with the National Library’s obligation as stated in section 6.2 (k) of the Memorandum of Understanding with participant agencies. 1.1 Consultation mechanisms The National Library continued to inform other PANDORA participants about the operation of PANDORA through an email discussion list, the PANDORA Wiki and an ad hoc newsletter distributed through email and the Wiki.
    [Show full text]
  • Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/CISP(2009)9/FINAL
    Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/CISP(2009)9/FINAL Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 23-Mar-2010 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY COMMITTEE FOR INFORMATION, COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS POLICY Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/CISP(2009)9/FINAL Working Party on Communication Infrastructures and Services Policy DEVELOPMENTS IN CABLE BROADBAND NETWORKS English - Or. English JT03280592 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format DSTI\ICCP\CISP(2009)9/FINAL FOREWORD The Working Party on Communication Infrastructures and Services Policy (CISP) discussed this report at its meeting in December 2009. CISP agreed to forward the document for declassification by the Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy (ICCP). The ICCP Committee agreed to make the report public in March 2010. The report was prepared by Mr. Hyun-Cheol CHUNG of the OECD’s Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. It is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. © OECD 2010/OCDE 2010 2 DSTI\ICCP\CISP(2009)9/FINAL MAIN FINDINGS The position of cable operators within the pay TV market has changed drastically in recent years. Although video service remains core to the cable industry’s business model, cable TV’s market share has been dropping significantly with intense competition from direct broadcast satellite services (DBS), Internet protocol Television (IPTV) services, digital terrestrial television services (DTT) and finally from over-the-top (OTT) service providers that supply video over an existing data connection from a third party.
    [Show full text]
  • Diffusion and Impacts of the Internet and E-Commerce: the Case of Denmark
    Diffusion and Impacts of the Internet and E-Commerce: The Case of Denmark August 2004 NIELS BJØRN-ANDERSEN KIM VIBORG ANDERSEN Center for E-Commerce Copenhagen Business School, Denmark E-mail: {nba, andersen}@cbs.dk Please refer all correspondence about this paper to [email protected] This research is a part of the Globalization and E-Commerce project of the Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations (CRITO) at the University of California, Irvine. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0085852. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. ______________________________________________________________________________ Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations University of California, Irvine | www.crito.uci.edu ABSTRACT Danish companies are ahead of those in the U.S. in B2C e-commerce. With the exception of Germany, Denmark is leading the group of 10 countries included in the globalization of e- commerce survey data, forming the basis for this report. Yet the surveyed countries are performing substantially better than Denmark in B2B online sales. Danish companies have high levels of investment in IT, the lowest barriers for e-commerce, and the highest levels of e-commerce drivers. Most indicators for e-commerce readiness, such as use of e-mail, intranet, EDI, extranet, and the provision of mobile services, show that the Danish business sector has adopted the technologies that foster e-commerce development. Yet our analysis also points to several alarming and surprising findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report to Partners 2015-2016
    Annual report to partners 2015-2016 Contents 1. PANDORA Participants working together 1.1 Consultation mechanisms 1.2 Reports 1.3 Collaborative collecting 2. Growth of the PANDORA Archive 2.1 Size and annual growth of the PANDORA Archive 2.2 Statistics for annual participant contributions 3. Development of the Web Archive 3.1 Extension of Legal Deposit to electronic materials 3.2 Development of PANDAS 3.3 Australian web domain harvest 3.4 Collecting Commonwealth Government online publications 4. Focus on users 4.1 User views of the PANDORA Archive 4.2 User views of the Australian Government Web Archive 4.3 Most viewed titles (websites) in the PANDORA Archive 5. Promoting the Archive 5.1 Presentations, representations and papers 5.2 Visitors to the National Library 6. Concluding summary 1 1. PANDORA participants working together PANDORA, Australia’s Web Archive (http://pandora.nla.gov.au/) is a selective archive of Australian online publications and websites which is built collaboratively by the National Library of Australia, all of the mainland state libraries, the Northern Territory Library, the Australian War Memorial, the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) and the National Gallery of Australia. This is a report to contributing participants on activities and developments in the 2015-2016 financial year. 1.1 Consultation mechanisms The National Library continued to inform other PANDORA participants about the operation of PANDORA through an email discussion list, the PANDORA Wiki and a regular newsletter distributed through email and the Wiki. 1.2 Reports Each month, a report on the growth of the Archive and usage statistics is sent to the email discussion list.
    [Show full text]