DOCSLIB.ORG

Field Guide to Insects and Diseases of Arizona and New Mexico Forests

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Field Guide to Insects and Diseases of Arizona and New Mexico Forests United States Department of Field Guide to Agriculture Insects and Forest Service Diseases of Southwestern Region Arizona and New MR-R3-16-3 Mexico Forests Ips galleries Piñon ips and armillaria mycelial fans Southwestern dwarf Pandora moth mistletoe larva broom on fire The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Field Guide to Insects and Diseases of Arizona and New Mexico Forests Mary Lou Fairweather, Plant Pathologist Joel McMillin, Entomologist Terry Rogers, Entomologist Dave Conklin, Plant Pathologist Bobbe Fitzgibbon, Entomologist USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region 333 Broadway Blvd., SE Albuquerque, NM 87102 www.fs.fed.us/r3/resources/health 2006 Acknowledgements The authors thank all former pathologists and entomologists, who either worked on the original insect and disease field guide developed in the 1980s, or worked on getting this version started. Special thanks to Sandra Roberts, printing specialist and Dan Ryerson, GIS specialist for the Southwestern Region in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Photographs and other illustrations were obtained, as credited later in this document, from individuals, the files of the USDA Forest Service, and other sources as cited. Preface This book replaces “Forest Insect and Disease Field Guide” (Beatty 1983). Although amendments had been made to the former guide, our knowledge of forest insects and diseases has increased and some organisms have only recently been identified or found to cause significant damage. This new guide is designed to be practical for the field. Not every forest insect or disease of the Southwest is covered, but we have attempted to include those having significant ecological and/or economic impacts on forest resources such as recreation, wildlife, wood production, and watershed quality. This field guide is divided into insect and disease sections, each with its own description, illustrations, and host index. Literature cited, glossary, and general index are at the end of this field guide. Table of Contents Roles of Forest Insects and Pathogens . 1 Invasive Pests . 2 Guide to Forest Insects and Diseases . 4 Forest Insect Defoliators . 7 Western Spruce Budworm. 8 Douglas-fir Tussock Moth. 11 Pine-feeding Needleminers. 14 White Fir Needleminer . 16 Pandora Moth. 18 Pine Butterfly . 20 Pine Sawflies. 22 Tiger Moth. 24 New Mexico Fir Looper . 26 Nepytia janetae . 27 Fall Webworm. 29 Western Tent Caterpillar . 31 Large Aspen Tortrix . 33 Alder Flea Beetle . 35 Sap-Sucking Insects, Gall Formers, and Mites . 37 Aphids . 38 Cooley Spruce Gall Adelgid . 40 Spruce Aphid. 42 Pinyon Needle Scale . 44 Prescott Scale. 46 Pine Needle Scale . 49 Ponderosa Pine Resin Midge . 50 Pinyon Spindle Gall Midge. 52 Spittlebugs. 53 Spider Mites. 54 Bark Beetles . 55 Pine Engravers . 59 Western Pine Beetle . 63 Mountain Pine Beetle. 65 Roundheaded Pine Beetle . 67 Southern Pine Beetle and Mexican Pine Beetle. 70 Red Turpentine Beetle . 72 Spruce Beetle . 74 Douglas-fir Beetle. 77 Western Balsam Bark Beetle . 79 Fir Engraver . 81 Twig Beetles. 83 Cedar Bark Beetles . 85 Wood Borers . 87 Wood Borers . 88 Juniper Borers. 90 Ambrosia Beetles. 92 Cone and Seed Insects . 94 Cone Beetles . 95 Ponderosa Pine Seedworm. 97 Pine Seed Chalcid . 98 Pine Coneworm. 99 Bud and Shoot Insects . 100 Pine Tip Moths. 101 Western Pineshoot Borer. 103 Pinyon Pitch Nodule Moth . 105 Bark Moths . 106 Pitch Moth. 106 Juniper Twig Pruner. 107 Insects of Wood Products . 108 Carpenter Ants . 109 Termites. 111 Foliar Diseases . 113 Hardwood Leaf Diseases . 113 Black Leaf Spot. 114 Ink Spot Leaf Blight . 115 Melampsora Rust . 116 Shepherd’s Crook. 117 Sycamore Anthracnose . 118 Conifer Needle Diseases. 120 Lophodermella Needle Cast. 121 Elytroderma Needle Cast. 123 Red Band Needle Blight . 125 Rhabdocline Needle Cast. 126 True Fir Needle Cast. 128 White Pine Needle Cast . 129 Pinyon Needle Rust . 130 Stem Decays and Stains . 132 Red Ring Rot . 134 Red Rot . 136 Indian Paint Fungus . 139 Red Belt Fungus. 141 Pouch Fungus. 142 Blue Stain Fungi . 143 False Tinder Conk. 144 Heart Rots of Oak . 145 Canker Rot of Oak . 146 Cankers . 147 Black Canker. 148 Sooty Bark Canker. 150 Cytospora Canker . 152 Cryptosphaeria Canker . 154 Hypoxylon Canker. 156 Atropellis Canker. 158 Stem and Cone Rusts of Pine . 160 White Pine Blister Rust. 161 Limb Rust . 164 Western Gall Rust . 166 Comandra Blister Rust. 167 Gymnosporangium Rusts. 169 Fir Broom Rust . 171 Spruce Broom Rust. 171 Southwestern Cone Rust. 175 Mistletoes . 176 Dwarf Mistletoes. 177 True Mistletoes . 184 Root Disease . 189 Armillaria or Shoestring Root Rot. 191 Annosus Root Rot. 193 Tomentosus Root Disease. 196 Schweinitzii Root and Butt Rot. 198 Black Stain Root Disease. 200 Ganoderma Root Rot. 202 Non-infectious Disorders . 204 Drought . 205 Frost . 206 Winter Injury. 207 Red Belt . 208 Windthrow. 209 Lightning. 210 Salt Damage. .211 Burls . 212 Animal Damage . 213 Ungulates . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GIS Handbook Appendices
    Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Appendix D Cooperating Agency Codes The following table lists the aerial survey cooperating agencies and codes to be used in the agency1, agency2, agency3 fields of the flown/not flown coverages. The contents of this list is available in digital form (.dbf) at the following website: http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/publications/id/id_guidelines.html 28 Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Code Agency Name AFC Alabama Forestry Commission ADNR Alaska Department of Natural Resources AZFH Arizona Forest Health Program, University of Arizona AZS Arizona State Land Department ARFC Arkansas Forestry Commission CDF California Department of Forestry CSFS Colorado State Forest Service CTAES Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station DEDA Delaware Department of Agriculture FDOF Florida Division of Forestry FTA Fort Apache Indian Reservation GFC Georgia Forestry Commission HOA Hopi Indian Reservation IDL Idaho Department of Lands INDNR Indiana Department of Natural Resources IADNR Iowa Department of Natural Resources KDF Kentucky Division of Forestry LDAF Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry MEFS Maine Forest Service MDDA Maryland Department of Agriculture MADCR Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation MIDNR Michigan Department of Natural Resources MNDNR Minnesota Department of Natural Resources MFC Mississippi Forestry Commission MODC Missouri Department of Conservation NAO Navajo Area Indian Reservation NDCNR Nevada Department of Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Chiricahua National Monument
    In Cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Chiricahua National Monument Open-File Report 2008-1023 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Park Service This page left intentionally blank. In cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Chiricahua National Monument By Brian F. Powell, Cecilia A. Schmidt, William L. Halvorson, and Pamela Anning Open-File Report 2008-1023 U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center Sonoran Desert Research Station University of Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior School of Natural Resources U.S. Geological Survey 125 Biological Sciences East National Park Service Tucson, Arizona 85721 U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web:http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested Citation Powell, B.F., Schmidt, C.A., Halvorson, W.L., and Anning, Pamela, 2008, Vascular plant and vertebrate inventory of Chiricahua National Monument: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1023, 104 p. [http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1023/]. Cover photo: Chiricahua National Monument. Photograph by National Park Service. Note: This report supersedes Schmidt et al. (2005). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Pine Shoot Insects Common in British Columbia
    Environment Environnement 1+ Canada Canada Pine Shoot Insects Canadian Service Forestry canadien des Common in Serv~e forits British Columbia David Evans Pacific Forest Research Centre Victoria, British Columbia BC-X-233 PACIFIC FOREST RESEARCH CENTRE The Pacific Forest Research Centre (PFRC) is one of six regional research estab­ lishments of the Canadian Forestry Service of Environment Canada. The centre conducts a program of work directed toward the solution of major forestry problems and the development of more effective forest management techniques for use in British Columbia and the Yukon. The 30 research projects and over 150 studies which make up the research pro­ gram of PFRC are divided into three areas known as Forest Protection, Forest Environment and Forest Resources. These are supported by an Economics, Information and Administrative section and a number of specialized research support services such as analytical chemistry, computing microtechnique and remote sensing. Current research projecu, which focus on the establishment, growth and protection of the foresu, include: forest pathology problems, researd1 0f1 seed and cone insecU and disease, biological control of forest pesU, pest damage monitoring and assessment, seed and tree improvement, regenera­ tion and stand management. ISSN.()705·3274 Pine Shoot Insects Common in British Columbia David Evans Pacific Forest Research Centre 506 Wen Burnside Road. Victoria, British Columbia vaz 1M5 BC·X·233 1982 2 ABSTRACT RESUME This publication is an aid to the identification Ce document aidera a identifier les insectes of pine shoot insects on pines native to British Co­ des pousses du Pin sur les pins indigenes du Colombie­ lumbia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Green Spruce Aphid in Western Europe
    Forestry Commission The Green Spruce Aphid in Western Europe: Ecology, Status, Impacts and Prospects for Management Edited by Keith R. Day, Gudmundur Halldorsson, Susanne Harding and Nigel A. Straw Forestry Commission ARCHIVE Technical Paper & f FORESTRY COMMISSION TECHNICAL PAPER 24 The Green Spruce Aphid in Western Europe: Ecology, Status, Impacts and Prospects for Management A research initiative undertaken through European Community Concerted Action AIR3-CT94-1883 with the co-operation of European Communities Directorate-General XII Science Research and Development (Agro-Industrial Research) Edited by Keith R. t)ay‘, Gudmundur Halldorssorr, Susanne Harding3 and Nigel A. Straw4 ' University of Ulster, School of Environmental Studies, Coleraine BT52 ISA, Northern Ireland, U.K. 2 2 Iceland Forest Research Station, Mogilsa, 270 Mossfellsbaer, Iceland 3 Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Department of Ecology and Molecular Biology, Thorvaldsenvej 40, Copenhagen, 1871 Frederiksberg C., Denmark 4 Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Wrecclesham, Farnham, Surrey GU10 4LH, U.K. KVL & Iceland forestry m research station Forest Research FORESTRY COMMISSION, EDINBURGH © Crown copyright 1998 First published 1998 ISBN 0 85538 354 2 FDC 145.7:453:(4) KEYWORDS: Biological control, Elatobium , Entomology, Forestry, Forest Management, Insect pests, Picea, Population dynamics, Spruce, Tree breeding Enquiries relating to this publication should be addressed to: The Research Communications Officer Forest Research Alice Holt Lodge Wrecclesham, Farnham Surrey GU10 4LH Front Cover: The green spruce aphid Elatobium abietinum. (Photo: G. Halldorsson) Back Cover: Distribution of the green spruce aphid. CONTENTS Page List of contributors IV Preface 1. Origins and background to the green spruce aphid C. I. Carter and G. Hallddrsson in Europe 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Cone and Seed Insects of Southwestern White Pine Daniel E
    Forest Insect & Disease Leaflet 189 March 2020 U.S. D ep ar t ment of Ag r ic u lture • Forest S er v ice Cone and Seed Insects of Southwestern White Pine Daniel E. DePinte1, Kristen M. Waring2, and Monica L. Gaylord3 Introduction Southwestern white pine, Pinus stro­ biformis Engelm. (SWWP), like other western pines, has a guild of insect spe­ cies that feed on its cones and seeds. Those described here are the most commonly observed pests with a his­ tory of causing damage to SWWP cone and seed production. They are taxo­ nomically diverse, and include species of Hemiptera, Diptera, Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, and Hymenoptera. Host Distribution Southwestern white pine is a five- needled pine found throughout Figure 1. Distribution of southwestern white mixed conifer forests of the American pine in U.S. and Mexico (Shirk et al 2018). Southwest and Sierra Madre Occidental It is a major source of sustenance Mountains of Mexico (Figure 1). In for wildlife with its relatively large, the United States SWWP typically nutrient rich seeds. SWWP has been co-occurs with other species; very known to hybridize with limber pine rarely occurring as a pure stand at (P. flexilis). SWWP is also susceptible elevations from 7,000 to 10,000 feet to the non-native invasive pathogen, above sea level. It plays a critical role Cronartium ribicola (J. C. Fisch), which in early seral stages of forest succes­ causes white pine blister rust. When a sion and is a vital component of mixed SWWP tree is approximately 15 years conifer forest types.
    [Show full text]
  • How Will Aphids Respond to More Frequent Drought?
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.24.168112; this version posted December 10, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 1 Stressful times in a climate crisis: how will aphids respond to more 2 frequent drought? 3 Running title: Aphid-plant interactions under drought stress 4 Abstract 5 Aim 6 Aphids are abundant in natural and managed vegetation, supporting a diverse 7 community of organisms and causing damage to agricultural crops. Using a meta- 8 analysis approach, we aimed to advance understanding of how increased drought 9 incidence will affect this ecologically and economically important insect group, and to 10 characterise the underlying mechanisms. 11 Location 12 Global. 13 Time period 14 1958–2020. 15 Major taxa studied 16 Aphids. 17 Methods 18 We used qualitative and quantitative synthesis techniques to determine whether 19 drought stress has a negative, positive, or null effect on aphid fitness. We examined 20 these effects in relation to 1) aphid biology, 2) the aphid-plant. species combination. 21 We compiled two datasets: 1) a “global” dataset (n = 55 from 55 published studies) 22 comprising one pooled effect size per study, and 2) an “expanded” dataset (n = 93) 23 containing multiple datapoints per study, separated into different measures of aphid 24 fitness but pooled across aphid-plant combinations. Where reported, we extracted 25 data on the effect of drought on plant vigour, and plant tissue concentrations of 26 nutrients and defensive compounds, to capture the potential causes of aphid 27 responses.
    [Show full text]
  • Pheromone-Based Disruption of Eucosma Sonomana and Rhyacionia Zozana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Using Aerially Applied Microencapsulated Pheromone1
    361 Pheromone-based disruption of Eucosma sonomana and Rhyacionia zozana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) using aerially applied microencapsulated pheromone1 Nancy E. Gillette, John D. Stein, Donald R. Owen, Jeffrey N. Webster, and Sylvia R. Mori Abstract: Two aerial applications of microencapsulated pheromone were conducted on five 20.2 ha plots to disrupt western pine shoot borer (Eucosma sonomana Kearfott) and ponderosa pine tip moth (Rhyacionia zozana (Kearfott); Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) orientation to pheromones and oviposition in ponderosa pine plantations in 2002 and 2004. The first application was made at 29.6 g active ingredient (AI)/ha, and the second at 59.3 g AI/ha. Baited sentinel traps were used to assess disruption of orientation by both moth species toward pheromones, and E. sonomana infes- tation levels were tallied from 2001 to 2004. Treatments disrupted orientation by both species for several weeks, with the first lasting 35 days and the second for 75 days. Both applications reduced infestation by E. sonomana,but the lower application rate provided greater absolute reduction, perhaps because prior infestation levels were higher in 2002 than in 2004. Infestations in treated plots were reduced by two-thirds in both years, suggesting that while increas- ing the application rate may prolong disruption, it may not provide greater proportional efficacy in terms of tree pro- tection. The incidence of infestations even in plots with complete disruption suggests that treatments missed some early emerging females or that mated females immigrated into treated plots; thus operational testing should be timed earlier in the season and should comprise much larger plots. In both years, moths emerged earlier than reported pre- viously, indicating that disruption programs should account for warmer climates in timing of applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects That Feed on Trees and Shrubs
    INSECTS THAT FEED ON COLORADO TREES AND SHRUBS1 Whitney Cranshaw David Leatherman Boris Kondratieff Bulletin 506A TABLE OF CONTENTS DEFOLIATORS .................................................... 8 Leaf Feeding Caterpillars .............................................. 8 Cecropia Moth ................................................ 8 Polyphemus Moth ............................................. 9 Nevada Buck Moth ............................................. 9 Pandora Moth ............................................... 10 Io Moth .................................................... 10 Fall Webworm ............................................... 11 Tiger Moth ................................................. 12 American Dagger Moth ......................................... 13 Redhumped Caterpillar ......................................... 13 Achemon Sphinx ............................................. 14 Table 1. Common sphinx moths of Colorado .......................... 14 Douglas-fir Tussock Moth ....................................... 15 1. Whitney Cranshaw, Colorado State University Cooperative Extension etnomologist and associate professor, entomology; David Leatherman, entomologist, Colorado State Forest Service; Boris Kondratieff, associate professor, entomology. 8/93. ©Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. 1994. For more information, contact your county Cooperative Extension office. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Climatic Variability and Change on Forest Ecosystems: a Comprehensive Science Synthesis for the U.S
    United States Department of Effects of Climatic Variability and Agriculture Forest Service Change on Forest Ecosystems: Pacific Northwest Research Station A Comprehensive Science General Technical Synthesis for the U.S. Forest Report PNW-GTR-870 Sector December 2012 D E E P R A U R T LT MENT OF AGRICU The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, coop- eration with the States and private forest owners, and management of the national forests and national grasslands, it strives— as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, sexual orientation, marital status, family status, status as a parent (in education and training programs and activities), because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance pro- gram, or retaliation. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs or activities). If you require this information in alternative format (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.), contact the USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (Voice or TDD). If you require information about this program, activity, or facility in a language other than English, contact the agency office re- sponsible for the program or activity, or any USDA office. To file a complaint alleging discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Insect and Disease Conditions in the Southwestern Region, 2018
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Insect and Disease Conditions in the Southwestern Region, 2018 Forest Southwestern Forest Health September 2019 Service Region PR-R3-16-18 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632- 9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Estado Del Arte De Las Plantas Parásitas En México
    MMS ESTADO DEL ARTE DE PLANTAS PARÁSITAS EN MÉXICO CONSEJO NACIONAL DE CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGÍA RED TEMÁTICA DE SALUD FORESTAL COMISIÓN NACIONAL FORESTAL UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA CHAPINGO COLEGIO DE POSTGRADUADOS ESTADO DEL ARTE DE LAS PLANTAS PARÁSITAS EN MÉXICO Líder de la Línea de Investigación: Dr. Dionicio Alvarado Rosales. Postgrado en Fitosanidad-Fitopatología Colegio de Postgraduados Campus Montecillo, Edo. de México. DICIEMBRE, 2016 Ilustraciones: Mauricio Méndez S. Portada: Psittacanthus angustifolius Contenido: fruto de Cladocolea cupulata (Tomadas de: Geils et al., 2002). Página 2 ESTADO DEL ARTE DE PLANTAS PARÁSITAS EN MÉXICO CONTENIDO Pág. INTRODUCCIÓN 4 ANTECEDENTES 5 RELATORÍA DEL FORO 6 1. 1. IDENTIFICACIÓN DE ESPECIES 13 2. 2. ESPECIFICIDAD 18 3. 3. BIOLOGÍA MOLECULAR 18 4. 4. IMPACTO (PATOGÉNICO, ECONÓMICO Y SOCIAL) 19 5. 5. ESTUDIOS HISTOPATOLÓGICOS 23 6. 6. DIAGNÓSTICO E INCIDENCIA 24 7. 7. CONTRIBUCIÓN A LOS CICLOS BIOLÓGICOS 26 8. 8. ESTUDIOS EPIDEMIOLÓGICOS 28 9. 9. ESTRATEGIAS DE CONTROL Y MANEJO 29 10. NORMATIVIDAD 35 LITERATURA CITADA 41 ANEXOS 50 Página 3 MMS ESTADO DEL ARTE DE PLANTAS PARÁSITAS EN MÉXICO INTRODUCCIÓN Por cientos de años, las plantas parásitas han ocupado el interés público (religioso y mítico), y desde el siglo pasado los científicos investigan y estudian sus efectos en especies forestales de importancia económica en diversas partes del mundo. A pesar de que poseen pigmentos fotosensibles, estas plantas tienen hábitos parasitarios, por lo que dependen parcial o completamente de su hospedante para satisfacer sus demandas nutrimentales. Sus raíces modificadas (haustorios) les brindan soporte (fijación), y el vínculo que les permite extraer de su hospedante los suficientes recursos (carbohidratos, agua y sales minerales) para completar sus complejos ciclos biológicos.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Tortricids Trapped Using Eucosma and Rhyacionia Synthetic Sex Attractants
    Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 39(1), 1985, 26-32 FOREST TORTRICIDS TRAPPED USING EUCOSMA AND RHYACIONIA SYNTHETIC SEX ATTRACTANTS R. E. STEVENS,I C. SARTWELL,2 T. W. KOERBER,3 J. A. POWELL,4 G. E. DATERMAN,2 AND L. L. SOWER2 ABSTRACT. Moths of 31 non-target species of Tortricidae (30 Olethreutinae, 1 Tor­ tricinae) were lured to synthetic Eucosma and Rhyacionia sex attractants deployed in pine forests throughout 12 states in the western U.S. Genera represented include Petrova, Barbara, Phaneta, Eucosma, Epiblema, Epinotia, Ancylis, Dichrorampha, Sereda, Grapholita, Cydia, and Decodes, as well as a new genus near Rhyacionia. In 1977 and 1978 we conducted an extensive trapping survey in pine forests in the western United States, using synthetic sex attractants. The primary objective was to learn more about geographical distribution and host relationships of Eucosma sonomana Kearfott and species of Rhyacionia. While the major results have been published (Sartwell et aI., 1980; Stevens et aI., 1980), a variety of other moths, largely ole­ threutines, also responded to the lures. These were saved and identified when their numbers indicated more than chance captures. Generally, a minimum of 4-6 similar moths at a trapping location was considered sufficient to indicate attraction was not incidental, although in some instances we recovered fewer. The catches reported here provide clues regarding pheromone chemistry of and possible taxonomic relation­ ships among certain species. The information may be useful for future studies on these and related species. It also provides range extensions for some of the species captured. METHODS Details of the methods, including trapping periods and precise trap locations for most collections, are presented in the previously cited works (Sartwell et aI., 1980; Stevens et aI., 1980).
    [Show full text]