DOCSLIB.ORG

The Transatlantic on 2200 Meters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Transatlantic on 2200 Meters The Transatlantic on 2200 Meters Joe Craig, VO1NA and Alan Melia, G3NYK here has been much excite- ment below our so-called top Longing for the days when amateurs built band at 1.8 MHz. At less than T one-tenth this frequency, near their own gear and DX was big news? 136 kHz, you will find many amateurs en- joying QSOs using a variety of modes. Al- They’re back again...on the “top” top band. though US and Canadian amateurs need special permission to transmit here, there is a 2200 meter amateur band in many pared with the thickness (about 30 km) of in north Nova Scotia. Other, regularly heard European countries and in New Zealand. the daytime absorbing D-layer. Unlike HF calls in the early days of tests was the well Aside from its low frequency, the most strik- frequencies, LF has a substantial ground- known MF station of Jack, VE1ZZ and the ing thing about the 135.8-138.8 kHz band is wave service area, with the wave front being late Larry Kayser, VA3LK. its narrow width—only 2.1 kHz, barely wide bent to follow the curvature of the Earth to Daytime propagation is mainly ground enough to admit a single SSB transmission. some extent. In daytime, there is an absorb- wave, but at extreme range (in excess of Huge sources of interference are present ing ionized region, formed by photo-disso- 1500 km) there is a significant daytime in the band. In Greece, the Navy transmitter ciation, which corresponds to the D-layer ionospheric component. This has been seen SXV operates on 135.8 kHz, and in Canada (50 to 90 km) and, in general, it is consid- on the path between CT1DRP (Porto) and another Navy transmitter (CFH) is on 137.0 ered that ionospheric propagation is not an DCF39, a German utility station on 138.83 kHz. Just outside the band is the German element of daytime signals kHz located near Magdeburg, and also on station DCF39 on 138.83 kHz. These sta- Early in 1999 an FSK signal appearing certain occasions on the CFH to Europe tions have effective radiated power (ERP) nightly in the UK at 137.00 kHz was cor- path. The peak strength usually coincides levels in the tens of kilowatts and can be rectly identified by Alan, G3NYK as that with the solar zenith at mid-path. This is at heard on receivers thousands of miles away. from the Canadian Naval station, call sign approximately 1500 UTC for the CFH to At 100 kHz, there are the megawatt LORAN CFH, near Halifax in Nova Scotia. Rough Europe path, and around 1130 UTC for the (long range aid to navigation) transmitters early estimates of the path loss suggested CT to DCF path. The signal enhancement with their perpetual clatter, and above 150 that an amateur transatlantic crossing would under normal conditions on the 1950 km kHz we have the commercial long wave just be possible with the allowed 1 W ERP. DCF to CT path is about 10 dB. This en- band with powerful megawatt plus stations. Many were dubious, but only a few weeks hancement is caused by the sky-bound sig- How then can this band be of any use to the later Dave Bowman, GØMRF made the first nal being returned by the lower region of amateur experimenter? one-way LF crossing to John, VE1ZJ. Then the D-layer. Penetration of the D-layer in Amateurs have traditionally overcome days later Peter, G3LDO managed a cross- daytime subjects the wave to absorption, many obstacles in achieving their goals. band contact. Both of these events were co- so the enhancement is not as high as When regulators restricted us to the “use- incident with good received signal strength seen at night. Also, the apparent reflection less wavelengths” below 200 meters, we from CFH. John was located near Big Pond height is sure to be lower. spanned the globe. Now that we’re slowly being let above 200 meters again, we have used some modern technology and old-fash- ioned persistence to achieve amazing feats in this challenging environment on the long waves. We have even used the high power interference sources to our advantage. Propagation at 136 kHz It is generally agreed amongst the pro- fessional propagation researchers that propa- gation between 50 kHz and 150 kHz is different than both the bands above and be- low that region. The lower (VLF) frequen- Figure 1—On December 12, the Marconi and Poldhu radio clubs commemorate cies are described as propagating by a Marconi’s first transatlantic experiment. In 2003 they sent an LF signal from waveguide mode between the ground and the Newfoundland to England using very slow speed CW with dots 30 seconds long ionosphere. The waveguide mode dies out (QRSS30). Here is a screen capture of that signal received at G3NYK using Argo software. If you look carefully, you can make out white Morse characters spelling out mainly above 30 kHz and certainly above VO1NA against the noisy blue background. Argo uses Fast Fourier Transforms to get about 50 to 60 kHz. We believe this may very narrow effective bandwidths (fractions of a Hz) and is very popular with the LF due the wavelength becoming short com- crowd. More information on Argo is available on the Web at www.weaksignals.com. From July 2005 QST © ARRL Figure 2—Schematic and parts list for VO1NA’a class E LF transmitter. As explained in the text, transmitters at this frequency tend to be unique, requiring some experimentation. This transmitter was based on design ideas of several LF experimenters and tailored for parts available from VO1NA’s junk box. A very stable signal generator or TXCO may be used in place of the Marconi XH100 receiver. See the text for component details. C1—27 nF capacitor. C2—18 nF capacitor. L1—88 µH air wound inductor. L2—0.4 mH air wound inductor. L3—0.3-1.3 mH variometer. M1—50 Ω wattmeter. M2—RF ammeter, 2 A full scale (see text). M3—Drain current meter, 0-5 A dc. Q1, Q2—NPN small signal transistor, 2N4401 or equiv. Q3— PNP small signal transistor, 2N4403 or equiv. Q4—International Rectifier IRF640 N- channel MOSFET. RFC1—1.5 mH RF choke. T1—Impedance matching transformer with 5 primary turns and 13 secondary turns on a ferrite core. U1—7400 quad NAND gate. U2, U3—7490 decade counter. U4—7805 5-V regulator. At night, the photo-dissociated elec- trons in the D-layer decay (or recombine) quickly, as the darkness removes the ion- izing radiation. The “apparent reflection level” moves up to the base of the E-layer at around 90 to 100 km in altitude. The E- layer is a 24-hour layer, ionized, amongst other things, by high-energy cosmic rays. The atmospheric pressure is much lower than at the D-layer, so the chances of an electron encountering an atom or positive ion are much reduced and their “lifetimes” are extended. Thus, the nighttime wave has to travel through very little absorbing material. The ionospheric wave, often called the sky-wave, becomes stronger than the ground wave at distances exceed- ing about 800 km. Thus, all long distance contacts are due to ionospherically re- turned signals. These seemingly predictable conditions are altered by the effects of Solar distur- bances. The initial check of the Solar indi- ces against known good nights drew a blank, but it was relatively easy to spot potentially poor conditions. These occurred about 2 to 3 days after a geomagnetic event that lifted the Kp index to 5 or above. This is about the same level that leads to substantial auroral effects. The conditions deteriorated more, and took longer to recover, the higher the Kp rose. It is postulated, from the signal strength plots, that Coronal Mass Ejections (CME) were responsible for injecting hot electrons into the ionosphere. After these had time to diffuse to the D-layer region (the delay), their presence was felt as long-lived From July 2005 QST © ARRL absorbing material in the D-layer, reducing can’t work ’em,” is especially true on 2200 receiving amateur LF signals. On the se- the nighttime signal strengths. This delay is meters. Many general coverage amateur lectivity scale, a 500 Hz CW filter will do a reported in a number of professional papers transceivers can receive down to 100 kHz and good job. The remaining work, narrowing on Solar disturbance to LF propagation. So some go further, while others stop at 500 kHz. it down to 0.01 Hz, is taken care of by some the question remains: How to predict good If you can tune down to 135 kHz, try it and highly sophisticated software that takes the conditions? see what you can hear. If you can hear DCF39 audio from your receiver and splits it into A more recent extensive series of DX tests on 138.83 kHz after dark, you are indeed in tiny bands that can be displayed on a com- have confirmed that the lesser-known index, luck. If not, then try experimenting with your puter screen. The result is a series of Morse Dst (disturbance storm time), is a fairly good antenna. A long wire sometimes works if di- code dots and dashes across your computer indicator. Dst is determined by measuring the rectly connected to the antenna jack on the monitor. It is an amazing marriage of modern effect of ring of trapped ions and electrons transceiver. In reality, a 500 foot long wire is Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) technology circulating the equator in the Van Allen belt.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Emergency Radio Communications Plan – Northwest Region
    Emergency Radio Communications Plan Northwest Region May 3, 2010 Emergency Radio Communications Plan – Northwest Region Table of Contents Table of Contents .....................................................................................................................2 Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................4 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................5 Terrace PREOC ...............................................................................................................8 Local Authority Emergency Operations Centre (EOC).....................................................9 Activation ................................................................................................................................10 Net Operation ..........................................................................................................................11 Standby High Frequency ...............................................................................................11 Regional Nets ................................................................................................................11 PEP Net .........................................................................................................................11 Net Control Duties .........................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation on Collective Frequencies for Licence-Exempt Radio Transmitters and on Their Use
    FICORA 15 AIH/2015 M 1 (22) Unofficial translation Regulation on collective frequencies for licence-exempt radio transmitters and on their use Issued in Helsinki on 6 February 2015 The Finnish Communications Regulatory Authority (FICORA) has, under section 39(3 and 4) of the Information Society Code of 7 November 2014 (917/2014), laid down: Chapter 1 General provisions Section 1 The oObjective of the Regulation This Regulation lays down provisions on collective frequencies for as well as use and registration of such radio transmitters whose conformity with requirements has been attested in such a way as laid down in the Information Society Code, and for the possession and use of which a radio licence is not required. Section 2 Scope of application This Regulation applies to the following radio transmitters which operate only on the collective frequencies assigned in this Regulation and whose conformity with requirements has been attested in such a way as mentioned in section 257 or section 352 of the Information Society Code: 1) cordless CT1 telephones taken into use on 31 December 2003 at the latest, cordless CT2 telephones taken into use on 31 December 2004 at the latest, and DECT equipment; 2) mobile terminals and other terminals for GSM, UMTS, digital broadband mobile networks and terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services; 3) LA telephones (national Citizen Band equipment) which have been approved according to the regulations of 25 March 1981 by the General Directorate of Posts and Telecommunications
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey Amateur Radio Club?
    Are there Amateur Radio events during the year? 2017/2018 Executive Most Amateur Radio clubs meet weekly or President: Stan Williams VA7NF monthly. Hamfests are popular events that often 778-806-4662 feature the sale of new and used equipment and parts. Various radio contests are held Vice-President: John Brodie VA7XB throughout the year. Most important is Field 604-591-1825 Day. This contest, with emphasis on emergency SURREY conditions, is held on the last full weekend of Secretary: Jeremy Morse VE7TMY June. Operation, using temporary antennas and 604-8177763 generator or battery power, adds to the realism and simulates emergency conditions during a AMATEUR disaster. Treasurer: Scott Hawrelak VE7HA 604-862-6265 RADIO CLUB How can I learn about Amateur Radio? Information in this brochure has been adapted (with permission) from the Radio Radio Amateurs of Canada (RAC) publishes Amateurs of Canada website: study guides and The RAC Operating Manual, www.rac.ca/regulatory/faqham.htm available on-line from the RAC web site and some radio stores. Best of all, talk to an Amateur. How can I become a Member of the Surrey Amateur Radio Club? The Surrey Amateur Radio Club welcomes new Surrey Amateur Radio Club members, both experienced and beginner. The www.ve7sar.net Club will assist persons who have an interest in learning about amateur radio, becoming Meets at 7:00 pm on the licensed and participating in this exciting hobby second Wednesday of the month at: and public service. Please contact any of the Club executive listed Provincial Regional Emergency Operation on the back page of this brochure for more Center (PREOC) information, or simply come out to one of our 14292 Green Timbers Way, Surrey, BC meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Antennas for 136Khz Index
    ON7YD, longwave, 136kHz, antennas Page 1 of 51 ON7YD Antennas for 136kHz About this page : The main object of this page is to provide information. It has been deliberately kept simple, no fancy and flashy tricks, in order to achieve maximum compatibility for the different browsers and to allow fast downloading. Any comments and/or suggestions are welcome at : [email protected] last updated on 8 July 2004 Index 1. Introduction 2. Short vertical antennas 1. Vertical monopole antenna 2. Short vertical monopole 3. Vertical antenna with capacitive toploading 4. Umbrella antenna 5. Capacitive toploading of single-tower antennas 6. Spiral toploaded antenna 7. Vertical antenna with inductive toploading 8. Vertical antenna with capacitive and inductive toploading 9. Vertical antenna with tuned counterpoise 10. Meander antenna 11. Antenna with multiple vertical elements 12. Using a non isolated antenna-tower as LF-antenna 13. Antennas with a long horizontal section 14. Helical antenna 15. Short vertical dipole 16. Why a horizontal dipole is a rather unefficient antenna on LF 17. Safety precautions 18. Bringing a short vertical monopole to resonance 1. Loading coil 2. Coil losses : the Q-factor 3. Variometer 4. Tapped coil 5. Impedance matching 6. Bandwidth considerations 3. Efficiency of antenna systems on LF (short vertical antennas) 1. Antenna system 2. Efficiency 3. Antenna system efficiency, antenna directivity, ERP, EIRP and EMRP 4. Optimizing the antenna system efficiency 5. Enviromental losses 6. Ground loss 1. Type (composition) of the soil 2. Frequency 3. Shape and dimensions of the antenna 4. Radial system and ground rods 4. Measuring ERP on LF http://www.qsl.net/on7yd/136ant.htm 12/19/2006 ON7YD, longwave, 136kHz, antennas Page 2 of 51 1.
    [Show full text]
  • SMSE-005-05 – Consultation Paper on Broadband Over Power Line Communications System Created in Microsoft WORD 2000 XP Home Edition
    Attached are my comments to: Notice No. SMSE-005-05 – Consultation Paper on Broadband over Power Line Communications System Created in Microsoft WORD 2000 XP home edition I am a licensed amateur radio operator – VE7BWC, and am very concerned about the proposal to allow the BPL system, as anyone near power lines will experience harmful interference to incoming signals. There will be interference over a huge area and it will not only affect Amateurs. An example: ships at sea use HF (High Frequency) for any distance communications, as VHF is only useful for vessels in close proximity to one another. Long distance distress signals intended to be received at a shore-based station will be totally unreadable for any station near a power line. This will be true for any number of civil and commercial services. The amateur radio service has proven itself to be extremely useful in recent emergencies, being almost the only working communication after the disasters have struck. Almost all receiving stations worldwide are near power lines. In most disaster scenarios the amateur operators are using battery power so the signals coming out are not strong but with good conditions can be read over thousands of miles away. These signals would be unreadable unless and until there is major refinement of the proposed system. With today’s state-of-the-art technology in many disciplines it seems preposterous that such a system as BPL should be allowed. As it stands now it should be scrapped or put on hold, as it will be a massive assault on a huge area of the radio spectrum.
    [Show full text]
  • Etsi En 302 208 V3.1.1 (2016-11)
    ETSI EN 302 208 V3.1.1 (2016-11) HARMONISED EUROPEAN STANDARD Radio Frequency Identification Equipment operating in the band 865 MHz to 868 MHz with power levels up to 2 W and in the band 915 MHz to 921 MHz with power levels up to 4 W; Harmonised Standard covering the essential requirements of article 3.2 of the Directive 2014/53/EU 2 ETSI EN 302 208 V3.1.1 (2016-11) Reference REN/ERM-TG34-264 Keywords harmonised standard, ID, radio, RFID, SRD ETSI 650 Route des Lucioles F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex - FRANCE Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16 Siret N° 348 623 562 00017 - NAF 742 C Association à but non lucratif enregistrée à la Sous-Préfecture de Grasse (06) N° 7803/88 Important notice The present document can be downloaded from: http://www.etsi.org/standards-search The present document may be made available in electronic versions and/or in print. The content of any electronic and/or print versions of the present document shall not be modified without the prior written authorization of ETSI. In case of any existing or perceived difference in contents between such versions and/or in print, the only prevailing document is the print of the Portable Document Format (PDF) version kept on a specific network drive within ETSI Secretariat. Users of the present document should be aware that the document may be subject to revision or change of status. Information on the current status of this and other ETSI documents is available at https://portal.etsi.org/TB/ETSIDeliverableStatus.aspx If you find errors in the present document, please send your comment to one of the following services: https://portal.etsi.org/People/CommiteeSupportStaff.aspx Copyright Notification No part may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm except as authorized by written permission of ETSI.
    [Show full text]
  • Low RF Power Harvesting Circuit for Wireless Sensor Nodes in Industrial Plants
    Low RF Power Harvesting Circuit for Wireless Sensor Nodes In Industrial Plants Issam Chaour∗† Olfa Kanoun∗ and Ahmed Fakhfakh† ∗Chair for Measurement and Sensor Technology, Technische Universitat¨ Chemnitz , GERMANY †National Engineering School of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, TUNISIA Email: [email protected] Abstract—Techniques and methods of energy harvesting are developed to recuperate energy coming from the ambiance to be transmitted to electronic systems. Energy should be useful in specific applications, to generate a certain voltage level and make capable of delivering a recommended Power to the load. So, the main challenge for energy harvesting is to obtain a significant amount of power efficiently from the environment. This paper describes an overview of power transfer systems and methods of charging low power sensors in industrial plants using harvested RF signals. It introduces a scheme investigation of the RF harvester consisting of receiver antenna and a rectifier circuit to convert the RF signal to DC voltage. Low power consumption Fig. 1. System diagram for RF energy harvesting sensor application. circuits are used to achieve the target of highest conceivable efficiency in order to produce the maximum power transfer. Index Terms—RF Energy Harvesting; wireless sensor network; RF power transmission; industrial plants. or microwave energy [3]. In this paper, we explore a potential method to this challenges for recharging wireless sensor nodes I. INTRODUCTION by RF Power transmission and harvesting energy from RF ambient sources. The transmitted RF energy is captured by Many wireless sensor node architectures are adopted for use a receiver antenna, transformed into microwatts (µW) to low in a wireless access point, listen and control system.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission § 90.729
    § 87.525 47 CFR Ch. I (10–1–20 Edition) (1) The output power shall not exceed airport must be submitted with an ap- ¥3 dBm watts for each frequency au- plication. thorized. (c) Only one AWOS, ASOS, or ATIS (2) The antenna used in transmitting will be licensed at an airport. the audible warnings must be omnidirectional with a maximum gain [53 FR 28940, Aug. 1, 1988, as amended at 64 equal to or lower than a half-wave FR 27476, May 20, 1999] centerfed dipole above 30 degrees ele- § 87.529 Frequencies. vation, and a maximum gain of + 5 dBi from horizontal up to 30 degrees ele- Prior to submitting an application, vation. each applicant must notify the applica- (3) The audible warning shall not ex- ble FAA Regional Frequency Manage- ceed two seconds in duration. No more ment Office. Each application must be than six audible warnings may be accompanied by a statement showing transmitted in a single transmit cycle, the name of the FAA Regional Office which shall not exceed 12 seconds in and date notified. The Commission will duration. An interval of at least twen- assign the frequency. Normally, fre- ty seconds must occur between trans- quencies available for air traffic con- mit cycles. trol operations set forth in subpart E will be assigned to an AWOS, ASOS, or [78 FR 61207, Oct. 3, 2013] to an ATIS. When a licensee has en- tered into an agreement with the FAA Subpart R [Reserved] to operate the same station as both an AWOS and as an ATIS, or as an ASOS Subpart S—Automatic Weather and an ATIS, the same frequency will Stations (AWOS/ASOS) be used in both modes of operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Amateur Radio Guide to Digital Mobile Radio (DMR)
    Amateur Radio Guide to Digital Mobile Radio (DMR) By John S. Burningham, W2XAB February 2015 Talk Groups Available in North America Host Network TG TS* Assignment DMR-MARC 1 TS1 Worldwide (PTT) DMR-MARC 2 TS2 Local Network DMR-MARC 3 TS1 North America 9 TS2 Local Repeater only DMR-MARC 10 TS1 WW German DMR-MARC 11 TS1 WW French DMR-MARC 13 TS1 Worldwide English DMR-MARC 14 TS1 WW Spanish DMR-MARC 15 TS1 WW Portuguese DMR-MARC 16 TS1 WW Italian DMR-MARC 17 TS1 WW Nordic DMR-MARC 99 TS1 Simplex only DMR-MARC 302 TS1 Canada NATS 123 ---- TACe (TAC English) (PTT) NATS 8951 ---- TAC-1 (PTT) DCI 310 ---- TAC-310 (PTT) NATS 311 ---- TAC-311 (PTT) DMR-MARC 334 TS2 Mexico 3020-3029 TS2 Canadian Provincial/Territorial DCI 3100 TS2 DCI Bridge 3101-3156 TS2 US States DCI 3160 TS1 DCI 1 DCI 3161 TS2 DMR-MARC WW (TG1) on DCI Network DCI 3162 TS2 DCI 2 DCI 3163 TS2 DMR-MARC NA (TG3) on DCI Network DCI 3168 TS1 I-5 (CA/OR/WA) DMR-MARC 3169 TS2 Midwest USA Regional DMR-MARC 3172 TS2 Northeast USA Regional DMR-MARC 3173 TS2 Mid-Atlantic USA Regional DMR-MARC 3174 TS2 Southeast USA Regional DMR-MARC 3175 TS2 TX/OK Regional DMR-MARC 3176 TS2 Southwest USA Regional DMR-MARC 3177 TS2 Mountain USA Regional DMR-MARC 3181 TS2 New England & New Brunswick CACTUS 3185 TS2 Cactus - AZ, CA, TX only DCI 3777215 TS1 Comm 1 DCI 3777216 TS2 Comm 2 DMRLinks 9998 ---- Parrot (Plays back your audio) NorCal 9999 ---- Audio Test Only http://norcaldmr.org/listen-now/index.html * You need to check with your local repeater operator for the Talk Groups and Time Slot assignments available on your local repeater.
    [Show full text]
  • Licensed Devices General Technical Requirements
    Licensed Devices General Technical Requirements (Detailed Update October 2005) Steven Dayhoff Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering & Technology October, 2005 ¾TCB Workshop 1 Sessions for licensed devices intended to give an overview of FCC Processes & Rules, not to show limits for every type of device. The information covered is mainly related to equipment authorization of the transmitting equipment and not the licensing of the station. 1 Overview General Information How to find information at the FCC Creating a Grant Organizing a Report Licensed Device Checklist October, 2005 ¾TCB Workshop 2 This session will cover general information related to the FCC rules and technical requirements for licensed devices. Assumption is that everyone is familiar with testing equipment so test setup and equipment settings will not covered. The approval process for these types of equipment was previously called Type Acceptance or Notification. Now all methods of equipment approval are called Certification. This information generally applies to all Radio Service Rules for scopes B1 through B4. 2 General Information Understanding how FCC rules for licensed equipment are written and how FCC operates The FCC rules are Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 2 of the FCC Rules covers general regulations & Filing procedures which apply to all other rule parts Technical standards for licensed equipment are found in the various radio service rule parts (e.g. Part 22, Part 24, Part 25, Part 80, and Part 90, etc.) All material covered in this training is either in these rules or based on these rules October, 2005 ¾TCB Workshop 3 There are about 15 different radio service rule Parts which require equipment to be authorized before an operators license can be obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Range Calculation for 300Mhz to 1000Mhz Communication Systems
    APPLICATION NOTE Range Calculation for 300MHz to 1000MHz Communication Systems RANGE CALCULATION Description For restricted-power UHF* communication systems, as defined in FCC Rules and Regula- tions Title 47 Part 15 Subpart C “intentional radiators*”, communication range capability is a topic which generates much interest. Although determined by several factors, communica- tion range is quantified by a surprisingly simple equation developed in 1946 by H.T. Friis of Denmark. This paper begins by introducing the Friis Transmission Equation and examining the terms comprising it. Then, real-world-environment factors which influence RF commu- nication range and how they affect a “Link Budget*” are investigated. Following that, some methods for optimizing RF-link range are given. Range-calculation spreadsheets, including the special case of RKE, are presented. Finally, information concerning FCC rules govern- ing “intentional radiators”, FCC-established radiation limits, and similar reference material is provided. Section 7. “Appendix” on page 13 includes definitions (words are marked with an asterisk *) and formulas. Note: “For additional information, two excel spreadsheets, RKE Range Calculation (MF).xls and Generic Range Calculation.xls, have been attached to this PDF. To open the attachments, in the Attachments panel, select the attachment, and then click Open or choose Open Attachment from the Options menu. For addi- tional information on attachments, please refer to Adobe Acrobat Help menu“ 9144C-RKE-07/15 1. The Friis Transmission Equation For anyone using a radio to communicate across some distance, whatever the type of communication, range capability is inevitably a primary concern. Whether it is a cell-phone user concerned about dropped calls, kids playing with their walkie- talkies, a HAM radio operator with VHF/UHF equipment providing emergency communications during a natural disaster, or a driver opening a garage door from their car in the pouring rain, an expectation for reliable communication always exists.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiofrequency Radiation Measurements Public Wifi
    Radiofrequency Radiation Measurements for Public Wi-Fi Installations in Hong Kong Office of the Communications Authority 25 May 2017 Introduction The Office of the Communications Authority (formerly Office of the Telecommunications Authority, hereinafter collectively referred to as “OFCA”) has since 2007 regularly conducted territory-wide survey of the non-ionizing radiation (“NIR) levels in the public areas due to public Wi-Fi access points (“APs”). The survey aims to gauge the abovementioned NIR levels and ensure that the NIR generated from public Wi-Fi APs does not cause exposure to the public in excess of the exposure limit recommended by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (“ICNIRP”) which is adopted by the Communications Authority (“CA”), in consultation with the Department of Health, for the protection of the public against the NIR hazards from radio transmitting equipment. 2. This report1 presents the results of the survey conducted between November 2016 and February 2017. It is the fourth report in the series (previous ones were published in 2007, 2011 and 2014 respectively). As with the previous surveys, the latest survey results indicated that the NIR levels at the measurement locations with public Wi-Fi APs installed were well below the exposure limit recommended by the ICNIRP (the “ICNIRP limit”), ranging from less than 0.1% to 0.6% of the limit. The results tally with the finding of the World Health Organization (“WHO”) that exposure levels due to Wi-Fi are generally very low. According to the WHO, there is no convincing scientific evidence that the weak radiofrequency signals from wireless networks (including Wi-Fi) would cause adverse health effects.
    [Show full text]