DOCSLIB.ORG

Texas Conservation Plan for the Dunes Sagebrush Lizard (Sceloporus Arenicolus)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Texas Conservation Plan for the Dunes Sagebrush Lizard (Sceloporus Arenicolus) Texas Conservation Plan for the Dunes Sagebrush Lizard (Sceloporus arenicolus) Developed in consultation with: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Southwest Region U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Texas A&M University Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts Texas Interagency Task Force on Economic Growth and Endangered Species Texas Department of Agriculture Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Railroad Commission of Texas University of Texas System, University Lands Texas Farm Bureau Texas Oil & Gas Association Texas Royalty Council Texas & Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association Texas Wildlife Association Texas Association of Business February 13, 2012 February 13, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 AUTHORITIES, PURPOSE, AND NEED ..................................................................... 3 2.1 Legal and Regulatory Framework .......................................................................... 3 2.1.1 Overview of the ESA .............................................................................. 3 2.1.2 Candidate Conservation Agreements with Assurances and Enhancement of Survival Permits .................................................... 4 2.1.3 Habitat Conservation Plans and Incidental Take Permits ....................... 6 2.1.4 National Environmental Policy Act ........................................................ 7 2.1.5 State Law ................................................................................................. 7 2.2 Purpose and Need for Action ................................................................................ 10 2.3 Benefits of the Plan ............................................................................................... 11 3.0 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................. 12 3.1 Description of the DSL and DSL Habitat ............................................................. 12 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA TO BE ANALYZED .............................................. 15 4.1 Plan Area ............................................................................................................... 15 4.2 Permit Area ........................................................................................................... 16 5.0 DURATION ..................................................................................................................... 16 6.0 PROPOSED ACTION .................................................................................................... 16 6.1 Covered Activities ................................................................................................ 16 6.1.1 Oil and Gas Activities ........................................................................... 17 6.1.2 Agricultural Activities ........................................................................... 18 6.1.3 General Activities .................................................................................. 18 7.0 ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACTS ................................................................................... 18 7.1 Species Effects and Impacts Analysis ................................................................... 18 7.1.1 Loss, Destruction, Modification, or Fragmentation of Habitat ................................................................................................... 19 7.1.1.1 Impacts from Oil and Gas Extraction .................................... 19 TEXAS CONSERVATION PLAN i FOR THE DUNES SAGEBRUSH LIZARD February 13, 2012 7.1.1.2 Impacts from Agricultural Practices ...................................... 21 7.1.1.3 Impacts from Tebuthiuron ..................................................... 21 7.1.1.4 Impacts from OHV ................................................................ 22 7.1.1.5 Impacts from Alternative Energy Development .................... 23 7.1.2 Predation ................................................................................................ 23 7.1.3 Other Natural or Manmade Factors ....................................................... 24 7.1.3.1 Extreme Natural Conditions .................................................. 24 7.1.3.2 Impacts from Exposure to Toxic Chemicals and Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) Emissions ....................................... 24 7.2 Additional Species ................................................................................................ 24 8.0 CONSERVATION PROGRAM .................................................................................... 25 8.1 Biological Goals and Objectives ........................................................................... 27 8.2 Compliance and Effectiveness Monitoring and Reporting ................................... 29 8.2.1 Compliance Monitoring ........................................................................ 29 8.2.2 Effectiveness Monitoring ...................................................................... 30 8.2.3 Reporting ............................................................................................... 31 8.2.4 Confidentiality ....................................................................................... 32 8.3 Adaptive Management .......................................................................................... 33 8.3.1 Rationale for Adaptive Management .................................................... 33 8.3.2 Adaptive Management Process ............................................................. 34 8.4 Research Activities ............................................................................................... 36 8.5 Unique Components of the CCAA ....................................................................... 38 8.5.1 Assurances Provided ............................................................................. 38 8.5.2 Availability of Funds ............................................................................. 38 8.6 Conservation Measures Under the CCAA ............................................................ 39 8.6.1 Agricultural Conservation Measures ..................................................... 39 8.6.2 Oil and Gas Conservation Measures ..................................................... 40 8.6.3 Other Measures ..................................................................................... 42 8.6.4 Obligations of the Parties under the CCAA .......................................... 43 8.6.4.1 Permit Holder ......................................................................... 44 8.6.4.2 Participants ............................................................................ 44 TEXAS CONSERVATION PLAN ii FOR THE DUNES SAGEBRUSH LIZARD February 13, 2012 8.6.4.3 The FWS ................................................................................ 45 8.7 Unique Components of the HCP ........................................................................... 46 8.7.1 Minimization Strategy ........................................................................... 46 8.7.2 Mitigation Strategy ................................................................................ 46 8.7.3 Obligations of the Parties under the HCP ............................................. 47 8.7.3.1 Permit Holder ......................................................................... 47 8.7.3.2 Participants ............................................................................ 48 8.7.3.3 The FWS ................................................................................ 49 8.8 Recovery Strategy ................................................................................................. 49 8.9 Violations and Remedies ...................................................................................... 53 8.10 Notification of Habitat Loss .................................................................................. 54 8.11 Succession and Transfer ....................................................................................... 55 8.12 Modification/Amendment of the Permit ............................................................... 55 8.13 Termination of Participant CI or CP ..................................................................... 56 8.14 Permit Suspension or Revocation ......................................................................... 56 8.15 Dispute Resolution ................................................................................................ 56 8.16 No Third-Party Beneficiaries ................................................................................ 57 8.17 Applicable Law ..................................................................................................... 57 8.18 Cooperating Agencies and Parties ........................................................................ 57 8.19 Reservation of Rights ............................................................................................ 57 9.0 LEVEL OF EFFECT ANTICIPATED ......................................................................... 58 9.1 Level of Incidental Take ....................................................................................... 58 10.0 CHANGED/UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES ..................................................... 62 10.1 Changed Circumstances .......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dimensional Limits for Arthropod Eyes with Superposition Optics
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Vision Research 44 (2004) 2213–2223 www.elsevier.com/locate/visres Dimensional limits for arthropod eyes with superposition optics Victor Benno Meyer-Rochow a,*,Jozsef Gal b a School of Engineering and Sciences, International University Bremen (IUB), Campus Ring 6, Research II, D-28759 Bremen, Germany b Institute of Plant Biology, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Temesvari krt. 62, H-6701 Szeged, Hungary Received 10 December 2003; received in revised form 16 April 2004 Abstract An essential feature of the superposition type of compound eye is the presence of a wide zone, which is transparent and devoid of pigment and interposed between the distal array of dioptric elements and the proximally placed photoreceptive layer. Parallel rays, collected by many lenses, must (through reflection or refraction) cross this transparent clear-zone in such a way that they become focused on one receptor. Superposition depends mostly on diameter and curvature of the cornea, size and shape of the crystalline cone, lens cylinder properties of cornea and cone, dimensions of the receptor cells, and width of the clear-zone. We examined the role of the latter by geometrical, geometric-optical, and anatomical measurements and concluded that a minimal size exists, below which effective superposition can no longer occur. For an eye of a given size, it is not possible to increase the width of the clear-zone cz ¼ dcz=R1 and decrease R2 (i.e., the radius of curvature of the distal retinal surface) and/or c ¼ dc=R1 without reaching a limit.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Chromosomal Analysis of Ghost Stag Beetle, Odontolabis Siva (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea, Lucanidae)
    22 วารสารวิทยาศาสตร์ คชสาส์น / ปีที่ 39 ฉบับที่ 2 กรกฎาคม-ธันวาคม 2560 The First Chromosomal Analysis of Ghost Stag Beetle, Odontolabis siva (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea, Lucanidae) Sibenja, K.1, Tanomtong, A.1, Getlekha, N.1, Jumrusthanasan, S.2, Kaewsri, S.2, & Pinthong, K.3* บทคัดย่อ การศึกษาแคริโอไทป์ครั้งแรกของด้วงคีมซิว่า (Odontolabis siva) เตรียมโครโมโซมจากอัณฑะ ของด้วงเพศผู้จ านวน 10 ตัว ด้วยเทคนิคการบดขยี้เซลล์ ผลการศึกษาพบว่า ด้วงคีมซิว่าเพศผู้มีจ านวน โครโมโซมดิพลอยด์ (2n) เท่ากับ 29 แท่ง มีจ านวนโครโมโซมพื้นฐานเท่ากับ 55 ในเพศผู้ ประกอบด้วย โครโมโซมชนิดเมทาเซนทริกขนาดใหญ่ 10 แท่ง ซับเมทาเซนทริกขนาดใหญ่ 14 แท่ง อะโครเซนทริก ขนาดใหญ่ 2 แท่ง และเทโลเซนทริกขนาดเล็ก 2 แท่ง มีการก าหนดเพศระบบ XO โดยโครโมโซมเอ็กซ์ เป็นชนิดเทโลเซนทริกขนาดเล็กมากที่สุด การศึกษาการแบ่งเซลล์ไมโอซิส พบว่า ในระยะเมทาเฟส 2 มี จ านวนโครโมโซมแฮพลอยด์ (n) เท่ากับ14 แท่ง (14+O) และ 15 แท่ง(14+X) ด้วงคีมซิว่าเพศผู้มีสูตรแค m sm a t ริโอไทป์ (2n=29) = L 10+ L 14+ L 2+ S 2+ โครโมโซมเพศ (XO) ค ำส ำคัญ: โครโมโซม, แคริโอไทป์, ด้วงคีมซิว่า 1 Toxic Substances in Livestock and Aquatic Animals Research Group, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Mueang 40002 2 Biology Program, Department of Science, Faculty of Science, Buriram Rajabhat University, Mueang, Buriram 31000 3 Department of Fundamental Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Surindra Rajabhat University, Mueang, Surin 32000 *Corresponding Author, E-mail: [email protected] Koch Cha Sarn Journal of Science / Vol.39 No.2 July-December 2017 23 Abstract This research is the first karyotype study of ghost stag beetles (Odontolabis siva). Chromosome preparation was collected from testes of 10 male’s beetles by squash technique. The results showed the diploid number of chromosome was 2n=29, the fundamental number (NF) was 55 in males. Karyotype was present as 10 large metacentric, 14 large submetacentric, 2 large acrocentric and 2 small telocentric chromosomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera) with Corrections to Nomenclature and a Current Classification
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Entomology Museum, University of Nebraska State November 2006 A REVIEW OF THE FAMILY-GROUP NAMES FOR THE SUPERFAMILY SCARABAEOIDEA (COLEOPTERA) WITH CORRECTIONS TO NOMENCLATURE AND A CURRENT CLASSIFICATION Andrew B. T. Smith University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers Part of the Entomology Commons Smith, Andrew B. T., "A REVIEW OF THE FAMILY-GROUP NAMES FOR THE SUPERFAMILY SCARABAEOIDEA (COLEOPTERA) WITH CORRECTIONS TO NOMENCLATURE AND A CURRENT CLASSIFICATION" (2006). Papers in Entomology. 122. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/122 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Museum, University of Nebraska State at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Coleopterists Society Monograph Number 5:144–204. 2006. AREVIEW OF THE FAMILY-GROUP NAMES FOR THE SUPERFAMILY SCARABAEOIDEA (COLEOPTERA) WITH CORRECTIONS TO NOMENCLATURE AND A CURRENT CLASSIFICATION ANDREW B. T. SMITH Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Station D Ottawa, ON K1P 6P4, CANADA [email protected] Abstract For the first time, all family-group names in the superfamily Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) are evaluated using the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature to determine their availability and validity. A total of 383 family-group names were found to be available, and all are reviewed to scrutinize the correct spelling, author, date, nomenclatural availability and validity, and current classification status. Numerous corrections are given to various errors that are commonly perpetuated in the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • TCAP Coordinator, TPWD
    TEXAS CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN High Plains DRAFT ECOREGION HANDBOOK JUNE 2011 Note: text in red in this document will be revised between June 10 Public Comment Draft and the final USFWS-approved document. THIS IS A SUMMARY of the HANDBOOK; more background information will be added. In accordance with Texas State Depository Law, this publication is available at the Texas State Publications Clearinghouse and/or Texas Depository Libraries. © Texas Parks and Wildlife Department PWD insert number when approved Citing this document: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. 2011. Texas Conservation Action Plan 2011 – 2016: High Plains Handbook. Editor, Wendy Connally, Texas Conservation Action Plan Coordinator. PWD insert number when approved. Austin, Texas. Contents SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 HOW TO GET INVOLVED ............................................................................................................................... 2 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 RARE SPECIES and COMMUNITIES .............................................................................................................. 10 PRIORITY HABITATS ..................................................................................................................................... 16 ISSUES ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Lucanidae). Tenebrionoidea
    J. Acad. Entomol. Soc. 4: 25-31 (2008) NEW RECORDS The stag beetles of the Maritime Provinces of Canada (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) Christopher G. Majka ABSTRACT Four species of Lucanidae are now known to occur in the Maritime Provinces. Platycerus depressus is added to the faunal list of Nova Scotia, and Platycerus virescens, Nicagus obscurus, and Ceruchus piceus are added to the faunal list of New Brunswick. Nicagus obscurus is also newly recorded in Maine and in the Maritime Provinces as a whole. Platycerus marginalis is removed from the faunal list of both New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. The composition and distribution of lucanids in the region is discussed, including their apparent absence on Prince Edward Island. Their particular association with hardwoods is noted as a potentially useful indicator in relation to the health and biodiversity of deciduous forests that have historically been affected by forest management practices and disease. RÉSUMÉ On reconnait désormais que quatre espèces de Lucanidés se retrouvent dans les provinces maritimes. Platycerus depressus est ajouté à la liste faunistique de la Nouvelle-Écosse, et Platycerus virescens, Nicagus obscurus, ainsi que Ceruchus piceus sont ajoutés à la liste faunistique du Nouveau- Brunswick. Nicagus obscurus est aussi nouvellement recensé dans le Maine et l’ensemble des provinces maritimes. Platycerus marginalis est retiré des listes faunistiques de la Nouvelle-Écosse et du Nouveau-Brunswick. La composition et la distribution des Lucanidés dans la région sont discutées, de même que leur apparente absence sur l’Île-du-Prince-Édouard. Leur association particulière aux feuillus est notée en tant qu’indicateur potentiel de la santé et de la biodiversité des forêts décidues affectées historiquement par les pratiques d’aménagement forestier et les maladies.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Lucanidae), and Comparison with the Sympatric Lissotes Rudis Lea
    Zootaxa 3884 (4): 347–359 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3884.4.4 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A810E147-F241-44A3-831B-DD312C0A7029 Descriptions and key to the larvae of the Tasmanian endemic genus Hoplogonus Parry (Coleoptera: Lucanidae), and comparison with the sympatric Lissotes rudis Lea KAREN RICHARDS1,2 & CHRIS P. SPENCER2 1 Threatened Species & Marine Section, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water & Environment, P.O. Box 44, Hobart, Tasma- nia 7001, Australia 2 INTA’FAUNA Ecological Consultants, 141 Valley Road, Collinsvale, Tasmania 7012, Australia Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The stag beetle (Coleoptera: Lucaindae) genus Hoplogonus Parry is endemic to northeastern Tasmania and contains three recognised species. Descriptions of the imagines have been published previously, but not the larvae. Descriptions of the larvae of the three Hoplogonus species and the sympatric Lissotes rudis Lea (also Lucanidae) are presented and discussed, and a key to aid identification of Hoplogonus larvae is included. The classification of Hoplogonus within the tribe Platycerini is proposed, alongside Lissotes. Key words: Lucanidae, Tasmania, Hoplogonus, Lissotes, edaphic, stridulatory apparatus, larvae, saproxylic Introduction Tasmania is home to a diverse stag beetle (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) fauna comprising five genera and more than 30 known species. Three of these genera, Syndesus MacLeay (Syndesinae), Ceratognathus Westwood (Aesalinae: Ceratognathini), and LamprimaLatreille (Lampriminae: Lamprimini) comprise alate species, which are widely distributed across much of Australasia. However, the other two genera, Hoplogonus Parry and Lissotes Westwood (both Lucaninae: Lucanini), are apterous and their species much more localised.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveys and Habitat Assessment of Endemic Insects at the Monahans Dune System
    Surveys and Habitat Assessment of Endemic Insects at the Monahans Dune System Final Report Prepared for the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department by Scott Longing, Ph.D. Department of Plant and Soil Science, College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409, [email protected], (806) 834-1965 Samuel Discua Department of Plant and Soil Science, College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409, [email protected] James Cokendolpher Natural Science Research Laboratory, Museum of Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409, [email protected], (806) 834-8729 November 14th, 2014 1 | P a g e Acknowledgements This project was made possible by funding from the Horned Lizard License Plate Program and the State Wildlife Grant Program of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Special thanks to Michael Smith and Arturo Tervarrez for their hospitality and for providing information and resources at Monahans Sandhills State Park. We thank Ronnie Miller for providing key access to the northern areas of Monahans Sandhills State Park through the Vest Ranch property. Numeorus entomologists kindly contributed records or facilitated the process of information gathering, including Ed Riley, James Reddell, Mike Quinn, Kojun Kanda, Darren Pollock and David Weissman. The field support of Justin Scott, Joanne Robles and William Tauber was greatly appreciated. Numerous students provided assistance with pinning, labelling, and cataloguing samples from the Monahans region: Joanne Robles, Ushio Kawai, Amanda Nichols, Rohith Kotha, Sergio Alejandro, Balaguera Reina, Devin Tucker, Janith Vermana, Medha Vemla, Lizette Rodriguez, David Randall, Vineetha Barre, Kasey Miller, Alex Gregg. Megan Leber, Ratna Venkata and Sravan Nuli.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of World Stag Beetles (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) Reveals a Gondwanan Origin of Darwin’S Stag Beetle ⇑ Sang Il Kim , Brian D
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 86 (2015) 35–48 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeny of world stag beetles (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) reveals a Gondwanan origin of Darwin’s stag beetle ⇑ Sang Il Kim , Brian D. Farrell Museum of Comparative Zoology, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA, USA article info abstract Article history: Stag beetles (family Lucanidae Latreille, 1804) are one of the earliest branching lineages of scarab beetles Received 23 September 2014 that are characterized by the striking development of the male mandibles. Despite stag beetles’ popularity Revised 6 February 2015 among traditional taxonomists and amateur collectors, there has been almost no study of lucanid relation- Accepted 17 February 2015 ships and evolution. Entomologists, including Jeannel (1942), have long recognized resemblance between Available online 28 February 2015 the austral stag beetles of the tribes Chiasognathini, Colophonini, Lamprimini, Pholidotini, Rhyssonotini, and Streptocerini, but this hypothesis of their close relationship across the continents has never been Keywords: tested. To gain further insight into lucanid phylogeny and biogeography, we reconstructed the first Biogeography molecular phylogeny of world stag beetles using DNA sequences from mitochondrial 16S rDNA, nuclear Chiasognathini Evolution 18S and 28S rDNA, and the nuclear protein-coding (NPC) gene wingless for 93 lucanid species representing Gondwana all extant subfamilies and 24 out of the 27 tribes, together with 14 representative samples of other early Lucanidae branching scarabaeoid families and two staphyliniform beetle families as outgroups. Both Bayesian infer- Phylogeny ence (BI) and maximum likelihood inference (MLI) strongly supported the monophyly of Lucanidae sensu lato that includes Diphyllostomatidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Species List
    ARTHROPOD SPECIES LIST KINGDOM PHYLUM ANIMALIA ARTHROPODA CLASS ORDER FAMILY COMMON NAME GENUS SPECIES ✓ LIST 1 Arachnida Araneae Araneidae Black and yellow garden spider Argiope aurantia 2 Arachnida Araneae Araneidae Fishing spider Dolomedes tenebrosus 3 Arachnida Araneae Araneidae Basilica orbweaver Mecynogea lemniscata 4 Arachnida Araneae Araneidae Spined micrathena Micrathena gracilis 5 Arachnida Araneae Araneidae Arrow-shaped micrathena Micrathena sagittata 6 Arachnida Araneae Araneidae Arrowhead orbweaver Verrucosa arenata 7 Arachnida Araneae Linyphiidae Bowl and doily spider Frontinella communis 8 Arachnida Araneae Oxyopidae Green lynx spider Peucetia viridans 9 Arachnida Araneae Pisuaridae Nursery web spider Pisuarina mira 10 Arachnida Araneae Saltiidae Bold jumper Phidippus audax 11 Arachnida Araneae Tetragnathidae Orchard orbweaver Leucauge venusta 12 Arachnida Araneae Theridiidae Southern black widow Latrodectus mactans 13 Arachnida Araneae Theridiidae Common house spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum 14 Malacostraca Isopoda Armadillidiidae Common pillbug Armadillidium vulgare 15 Malacostraca Isopoda Porcellionidae Rough sowbug Porcellio scaber 16 Insecta Blattodea Rhinotermitidae Eastern subterranean termite Reticulitermes flavipes 17 Insecta Coleoptera Anthribidae Marbled fungus beetle Euparius marmoreus 18 Insecta Coleoptera Buprestidae Red-necked cane borer Agrilus ruficollis 19 Insecta Coleoptera Cantharidae Soldier beetle Atalantycha bilineata 20 Insecta Coleoptera Cantharidae Soldier beetle Chauliognathus marginatus 21 Insecta
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 8-28-2020 The Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) of Iowa: An annotated checklist Edwin L. Freese Adel, Iowa Doug A. Veal Cedar Rapids, Iowa Paul K. Lago University of Mississippi, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons Freese, Edwin L.; Veal, Doug A.; and Lago, Paul K., "The Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) of Iowa: An annotated checklist" (2020). Insecta Mundi. 1280. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/1280 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. August 28 2020 INSECTA 83 urn:lsid:zoobank. A Journal of World Insect Systematics org:pub:88D45C5E-0E49-4F02- UNDI M 87A4-C4FA55A83B2F 0787 The Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) of Iowa: An annotated checklist Edwin L. Freese 33493 “S” Avenue Adel, Iowa 50003 Doug A. Veal 168 Thompson Drive SE Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52403 Paul K. Lago Biology Department, University of Mississippi University, Mississippi 38677 Date of issue: August 28, 2020 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL Edwin L. Freese, Doug A. Veal and Paul K. Lago The Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) of Iowa: An annotated checklist Insecta Mundi 0787: 1–83 ZooBank Registered: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:88D45C5E-0E49-4F02-87A4-C4FA55A83B2F Published in 2020 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIES DIVERSITY and SEASONAL ABUNDANCE of SCARABAEOIDEA at FOUR LOCATIONS in SOUTH CAROLINA Kevin Hinson Clemson University, [email protected]
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2011 SPECIES DIVERSITY AND SEASONAL ABUNDANCE OF SCARABAEOIDEA AT FOUR LOCATIONS IN SOUTH CAROLINA Kevin Hinson Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Hinson, Kevin, "SPECIES DIVERSITY AND SEASONAL ABUNDANCE OF SCARABAEOIDEA AT FOUR LOCATIONS IN SOUTH CAROLINA" (2011). All Theses. 1082. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/1082 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPECIES DIVERSITY AND SEASONAL ABUNDANCE OF SCARABAEOIDEA AT FOUR LOCATIONS IN SOUTH CAROLINA _______________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Entomology _______________________________________________________ by Kevin Richard Hinson May 2011 _______________________________________________________ Accepted by: Juang-Horng Chong, Committee Co-Chair John C. Morse, Committee Co-Chair Julia L. Sharp, Committee member ABSTRACT Using light, flight-intercept, and pitfall traps, 74, 327 specimens of Scarabaeoidea were captured at four golf courses in South Carolina during 2009-2010. Aphodiinae were identified only to the subfamily level and totaled 57,502 specimens. 16,825 specimens in 47 genera and 104 species in the families Ceratocanthidae, Geotrupidae, Hybosoridae, Lucanidae, Passalidae, Scarabaeidae (excluding Aphodiinae), and Trogidae were identified based on morphological characteristics. Similar to other southeastern studies focusing on phytophagous scarabs, the most abundant species consisted of Dyscinetus morator (Fabricius), Euetheola humilis (Burmeister), Cyclocephala lurida Bland, and Hybosorus illigeri Reiche.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Genus for the Neotropical Species of Aesalus Fabricius, with Descriptions of Eight New Species (Coleoptera: Lucanidae: Aesalinae)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 9-11-2013 A new genus for the Neotropical species of Aesalus Fabricius, with descriptions of eight new species (Coleoptera: Lucanidae: Aesalinae) M. J. Paulsen University of Nebraska State Museum, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Paulsen, M. J., "A new genus for the Neotropical species of Aesalus Fabricius, with descriptions of eight new species (Coleoptera: Lucanidae: Aesalinae)" (2013). Insecta Mundi. 829. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/829 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0325 A new genus for the Neotropical species of Aesalus Fabricius, with de- scriptions of eight new species (Coleoptera: Lucanidae: Aesalinae) M.J. Paulsen Systematics Research Collections University of Nebraska State Museum W436 Nebraska Hall Lincoln, NE 68588-0514 Date of Issue: October 11, 2013 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL M.J. Paulsen A new genus for the Neotropical species of Aesalus Fabricius, with descriptions of eight new species (Coleoptera: Lucanidae: Aesalinae) Insecta Mundi 0325: 1-25 ZooBank Registered: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:158EEA07-5357-4F7B-B8DF-C1B77EFE4DCB Published in 2013 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc. P. O. Box 141874 Gainesville, FL 32614-1874 USA http://www.centerforsystematicentomology.org/ Insecta Mundi is a journal primarily devoted to insect systematics, but articles can be published on any non- marine arthropod.
    [Show full text]