Surveys and Habitat Assessment of Endemic Insects at the Monahans Dune System
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Dimensional Limits for Arthropod Eyes with Superposition Optics
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Vision Research 44 (2004) 2213–2223 www.elsevier.com/locate/visres Dimensional limits for arthropod eyes with superposition optics Victor Benno Meyer-Rochow a,*,Jozsef Gal b a School of Engineering and Sciences, International University Bremen (IUB), Campus Ring 6, Research II, D-28759 Bremen, Germany b Institute of Plant Biology, Biological Research Centre, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Temesvari krt. 62, H-6701 Szeged, Hungary Received 10 December 2003; received in revised form 16 April 2004 Abstract An essential feature of the superposition type of compound eye is the presence of a wide zone, which is transparent and devoid of pigment and interposed between the distal array of dioptric elements and the proximally placed photoreceptive layer. Parallel rays, collected by many lenses, must (through reflection or refraction) cross this transparent clear-zone in such a way that they become focused on one receptor. Superposition depends mostly on diameter and curvature of the cornea, size and shape of the crystalline cone, lens cylinder properties of cornea and cone, dimensions of the receptor cells, and width of the clear-zone. We examined the role of the latter by geometrical, geometric-optical, and anatomical measurements and concluded that a minimal size exists, below which effective superposition can no longer occur. For an eye of a given size, it is not possible to increase the width of the clear-zone cz ¼ dcz=R1 and decrease R2 (i.e., the radius of curvature of the distal retinal surface) and/or c ¼ dc=R1 without reaching a limit. -
Phylogeny of Ensifera (Hexapoda: Orthoptera) Using Three Ribosomal Loci, with Implications for the Evolution of Acoustic Communication
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 38 (2006) 510–530 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeny of Ensifera (Hexapoda: Orthoptera) using three ribosomal loci, with implications for the evolution of acoustic communication M.C. Jost a,*, K.L. Shaw b a Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, USA b Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA Received 9 May 2005; revised 27 September 2005; accepted 4 October 2005 Available online 16 November 2005 Abstract Representatives of the Orthopteran suborder Ensifera (crickets, katydids, and related insects) are well known for acoustic signals pro- duced in the contexts of courtship and mate recognition. We present a phylogenetic estimate of Ensifera for a sample of 51 taxonomically diverse exemplars, using sequences from 18S, 28S, and 16S rRNA. The results support a monophyletic Ensifera, monophyly of most ensiferan families, and the superfamily Gryllacridoidea which would include Stenopelmatidae, Anostostomatidae, Gryllacrididae, and Lezina. Schizodactylidae was recovered as the sister lineage to Grylloidea, and both Rhaphidophoridae and Tettigoniidae were found to be more closely related to Grylloidea than has been suggested by prior studies. The ambidextrously stridulating haglid Cyphoderris was found to be basal (or sister) to a clade that contains both Grylloidea and Tettigoniidae. Tree comparison tests with the concatenated molecular data found our phylogeny to be significantly better at explaining our data than three recent phylogenetic hypotheses based on morphological characters. A high degree of conflict exists between the molecular and morphological data, possibly indicating that much homoplasy is present in Ensifera, particularly in acoustic structures. In contrast to prior evolutionary hypotheses based on most parsi- monious ancestral state reconstructions, we propose that tegminal stridulation and tibial tympana are ancestral to Ensifera and were lost multiple times, especially within the Gryllidae. -
Studies in Nearctic Desert Sand Dune Orthoptera: a New Genus And
Great Basin Naturalist Volume 25 Article 4 Number 3 – Number 4 12-31-1965 Studies in Nearctic desert sand dune Orthoptera: a new genus and species of stenopelmatine crickets from the Kelso Dunes with notes on its multi- annual life history and key. Part X Ernest R. Tinkham Indio, California Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Tinkham, Ernest R. (1965) "Studies in Nearctic desert sand dune Orthoptera: a new genus and species of stenopelmatine crickets from the Kelso Dunes with notes on its multi-annual life history and key. Part X," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 25 : No. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol25/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. STUDIES IN NEARCTIC DESERT SAND DUNE OR'IHOPTERA A new (ienus and Species of Stenopehnatine Crickets fioni the Kelso Dunes with notes on its multi-annual life history and k(>\-. Part X Eitu'st R. Tinkliiiin' During the past decade the author has made a score of trips to the great Kelso Dunes studying its fauna and flora; the summers of 1957-1960 assisted by National Science Foundation grants. As these dunes lie 155 miles north of Indio. California, by road, a total of 6200 miles has been travelled in these trips during the period 1954-1964. -
The Early Evolution of Biting–Chewing Performance in Hexapoda
Chapter 6 The Early Evolution of Biting–Chewing Performance in Hexapoda Alexander Blanke Abstract Insects show a plethora of different mandible shapes. It was advocated that these mandible shapes are mainly a function of different feeding habits. This hypothesis was tested on a larger sampling of non-holometabolan biting–chewing insects with additional tests to understand the interplay of mandible function, feeding guild, and phylogeny. The results show that at the studied systematic level, variation in mandible biting–chewing effectivity is regulated to a large extent by phylogenetic history and the configuration of the mandible joints rather than the food preference of a given taxon. Additionally, lineages with multiple mandibular joints such as primary wingless hexapods show a wider functional space occupation of mandibular effectivity than dicondylic insects (¼ silverfish + winged insects) at significantly different evolutionary rates. The evolution and occupation of a compa- rably narrow functional performance space of dicondylic insects is surprising given the low effectivity values of this food uptake solution. Possible reasons for this relative evolutionary “stasis” are discussed. 6.1 Introduction Insecta sensu lato (¼ Hexapoda) display a high diversity of mouthpart shapes within the early evolved lineages which started to radiate approximately 479 million years ago (Misof et al. 2014). These shape changes were described qualitatively and were often stated to relate mainly to the type of food consumed (Yuasa 1920; Isely 1944; Evans and Forsythe 1985; Chapman and de Boer 1995). To the knowledge of the author, this and related statements regarding mouthpart mechanics being shaped by functional demands have never been tested in a quantitative framework. -
A Guide to Arthropods Bandelier National Monument
A Guide to Arthropods Bandelier National Monument Top left: Melanoplus akinus Top right: Vanessa cardui Bottom left: Elodes sp. Bottom right: Wolf Spider (Family Lycosidae) by David Lightfoot Compiled by Theresa Murphy Nov 2012 In collaboration with Collin Haffey, Craig Allen, David Lightfoot, Sandra Brantley and Kay Beeley WHAT ARE ARTHROPODS? And why are they important? What’s the difference between Arthropods and Insects? Most of this guide is comprised of insects. These are animals that have three body segments- head, thorax, and abdomen, three pairs of legs, and usually have wings, although there are several wingless forms of insects. Insects are of the Class Insecta and they make up the largest class of the phylum called Arthropoda (arthropods). However, the phylum Arthopoda includes other groups as well including Crustacea (crabs, lobsters, shrimps, barnacles, etc.), Myriapoda (millipedes, centipedes, etc.) and Arachnida (scorpions, king crabs, spiders, mites, ticks, etc.). Arthropods including insects and all other animals in this phylum are characterized as animals with a tough outer exoskeleton or body-shell and flexible jointed limbs that allow the animal to move. Although this guide is comprised mostly of insects, some members of the Myriapoda and Arachnida can also be found here. Remember they are all arthropods but only some of them are true ‘insects’. Entomologist - A scientist who focuses on the study of insects! What’s bugging entomologists? Although we tend to call all insects ‘bugs’ according to entomology a ‘true bug’ must be of the Order Hemiptera. So what exactly makes an insect a bug? Insects in the order Hemiptera have sucking, beak-like mouthparts, which are tucked under their “chin” when Metallic Green Bee (Agapostemon sp.) not in use. -
The First Chromosomal Analysis of Ghost Stag Beetle, Odontolabis Siva (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea, Lucanidae)
22 วารสารวิทยาศาสตร์ คชสาส์น / ปีที่ 39 ฉบับที่ 2 กรกฎาคม-ธันวาคม 2560 The First Chromosomal Analysis of Ghost Stag Beetle, Odontolabis siva (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea, Lucanidae) Sibenja, K.1, Tanomtong, A.1, Getlekha, N.1, Jumrusthanasan, S.2, Kaewsri, S.2, & Pinthong, K.3* บทคัดย่อ การศึกษาแคริโอไทป์ครั้งแรกของด้วงคีมซิว่า (Odontolabis siva) เตรียมโครโมโซมจากอัณฑะ ของด้วงเพศผู้จ านวน 10 ตัว ด้วยเทคนิคการบดขยี้เซลล์ ผลการศึกษาพบว่า ด้วงคีมซิว่าเพศผู้มีจ านวน โครโมโซมดิพลอยด์ (2n) เท่ากับ 29 แท่ง มีจ านวนโครโมโซมพื้นฐานเท่ากับ 55 ในเพศผู้ ประกอบด้วย โครโมโซมชนิดเมทาเซนทริกขนาดใหญ่ 10 แท่ง ซับเมทาเซนทริกขนาดใหญ่ 14 แท่ง อะโครเซนทริก ขนาดใหญ่ 2 แท่ง และเทโลเซนทริกขนาดเล็ก 2 แท่ง มีการก าหนดเพศระบบ XO โดยโครโมโซมเอ็กซ์ เป็นชนิดเทโลเซนทริกขนาดเล็กมากที่สุด การศึกษาการแบ่งเซลล์ไมโอซิส พบว่า ในระยะเมทาเฟส 2 มี จ านวนโครโมโซมแฮพลอยด์ (n) เท่ากับ14 แท่ง (14+O) และ 15 แท่ง(14+X) ด้วงคีมซิว่าเพศผู้มีสูตรแค m sm a t ริโอไทป์ (2n=29) = L 10+ L 14+ L 2+ S 2+ โครโมโซมเพศ (XO) ค ำส ำคัญ: โครโมโซม, แคริโอไทป์, ด้วงคีมซิว่า 1 Toxic Substances in Livestock and Aquatic Animals Research Group, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Mueang 40002 2 Biology Program, Department of Science, Faculty of Science, Buriram Rajabhat University, Mueang, Buriram 31000 3 Department of Fundamental Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Surindra Rajabhat University, Mueang, Surin 32000 *Corresponding Author, E-mail: [email protected] Koch Cha Sarn Journal of Science / Vol.39 No.2 July-December 2017 23 Abstract This research is the first karyotype study of ghost stag beetles (Odontolabis siva). Chromosome preparation was collected from testes of 10 male’s beetles by squash technique. The results showed the diploid number of chromosome was 2n=29, the fundamental number (NF) was 55 in males. Karyotype was present as 10 large metacentric, 14 large submetacentric, 2 large acrocentric and 2 small telocentric chromosomes. -
Coleoptera) with Corrections to Nomenclature and a Current Classification
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Entomology Museum, University of Nebraska State November 2006 A REVIEW OF THE FAMILY-GROUP NAMES FOR THE SUPERFAMILY SCARABAEOIDEA (COLEOPTERA) WITH CORRECTIONS TO NOMENCLATURE AND A CURRENT CLASSIFICATION Andrew B. T. Smith University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers Part of the Entomology Commons Smith, Andrew B. T., "A REVIEW OF THE FAMILY-GROUP NAMES FOR THE SUPERFAMILY SCARABAEOIDEA (COLEOPTERA) WITH CORRECTIONS TO NOMENCLATURE AND A CURRENT CLASSIFICATION" (2006). Papers in Entomology. 122. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/122 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Museum, University of Nebraska State at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Coleopterists Society Monograph Number 5:144–204. 2006. AREVIEW OF THE FAMILY-GROUP NAMES FOR THE SUPERFAMILY SCARABAEOIDEA (COLEOPTERA) WITH CORRECTIONS TO NOMENCLATURE AND A CURRENT CLASSIFICATION ANDREW B. T. SMITH Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Station D Ottawa, ON K1P 6P4, CANADA [email protected] Abstract For the first time, all family-group names in the superfamily Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) are evaluated using the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature to determine their availability and validity. A total of 383 family-group names were found to be available, and all are reviewed to scrutinize the correct spelling, author, date, nomenclatural availability and validity, and current classification status. Numerous corrections are given to various errors that are commonly perpetuated in the literature. -
TCAP Coordinator, TPWD
TEXAS CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN High Plains DRAFT ECOREGION HANDBOOK JUNE 2011 Note: text in red in this document will be revised between June 10 Public Comment Draft and the final USFWS-approved document. THIS IS A SUMMARY of the HANDBOOK; more background information will be added. In accordance with Texas State Depository Law, this publication is available at the Texas State Publications Clearinghouse and/or Texas Depository Libraries. © Texas Parks and Wildlife Department PWD insert number when approved Citing this document: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. 2011. Texas Conservation Action Plan 2011 – 2016: High Plains Handbook. Editor, Wendy Connally, Texas Conservation Action Plan Coordinator. PWD insert number when approved. Austin, Texas. Contents SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 HOW TO GET INVOLVED ............................................................................................................................... 2 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 RARE SPECIES and COMMUNITIES .............................................................................................................. 10 PRIORITY HABITATS ..................................................................................................................................... 16 ISSUES ........................................................................................................................................................ -
Coleoptera: Lucanidae). Tenebrionoidea
J. Acad. Entomol. Soc. 4: 25-31 (2008) NEW RECORDS The stag beetles of the Maritime Provinces of Canada (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) Christopher G. Majka ABSTRACT Four species of Lucanidae are now known to occur in the Maritime Provinces. Platycerus depressus is added to the faunal list of Nova Scotia, and Platycerus virescens, Nicagus obscurus, and Ceruchus piceus are added to the faunal list of New Brunswick. Nicagus obscurus is also newly recorded in Maine and in the Maritime Provinces as a whole. Platycerus marginalis is removed from the faunal list of both New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. The composition and distribution of lucanids in the region is discussed, including their apparent absence on Prince Edward Island. Their particular association with hardwoods is noted as a potentially useful indicator in relation to the health and biodiversity of deciduous forests that have historically been affected by forest management practices and disease. RÉSUMÉ On reconnait désormais que quatre espèces de Lucanidés se retrouvent dans les provinces maritimes. Platycerus depressus est ajouté à la liste faunistique de la Nouvelle-Écosse, et Platycerus virescens, Nicagus obscurus, ainsi que Ceruchus piceus sont ajoutés à la liste faunistique du Nouveau- Brunswick. Nicagus obscurus est aussi nouvellement recensé dans le Maine et l’ensemble des provinces maritimes. Platycerus marginalis est retiré des listes faunistiques de la Nouvelle-Écosse et du Nouveau-Brunswick. La composition et la distribution des Lucanidés dans la région sont discutées, de même que leur apparente absence sur l’Île-du-Prince-Édouard. Leur association particulière aux feuillus est notée en tant qu’indicateur potentiel de la santé et de la biodiversité des forêts décidues affectées historiquement par les pratiques d’aménagement forestier et les maladies. -
Coleoptera: Lucanidae), and Comparison with the Sympatric Lissotes Rudis Lea
Zootaxa 3884 (4): 347–359 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3884.4.4 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A810E147-F241-44A3-831B-DD312C0A7029 Descriptions and key to the larvae of the Tasmanian endemic genus Hoplogonus Parry (Coleoptera: Lucanidae), and comparison with the sympatric Lissotes rudis Lea KAREN RICHARDS1,2 & CHRIS P. SPENCER2 1 Threatened Species & Marine Section, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water & Environment, P.O. Box 44, Hobart, Tasma- nia 7001, Australia 2 INTA’FAUNA Ecological Consultants, 141 Valley Road, Collinsvale, Tasmania 7012, Australia Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The stag beetle (Coleoptera: Lucaindae) genus Hoplogonus Parry is endemic to northeastern Tasmania and contains three recognised species. Descriptions of the imagines have been published previously, but not the larvae. Descriptions of the larvae of the three Hoplogonus species and the sympatric Lissotes rudis Lea (also Lucanidae) are presented and discussed, and a key to aid identification of Hoplogonus larvae is included. The classification of Hoplogonus within the tribe Platycerini is proposed, alongside Lissotes. Key words: Lucanidae, Tasmania, Hoplogonus, Lissotes, edaphic, stridulatory apparatus, larvae, saproxylic Introduction Tasmania is home to a diverse stag beetle (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) fauna comprising five genera and more than 30 known species. Three of these genera, Syndesus MacLeay (Syndesinae), Ceratognathus Westwood (Aesalinae: Ceratognathini), and LamprimaLatreille (Lampriminae: Lamprimini) comprise alate species, which are widely distributed across much of Australasia. However, the other two genera, Hoplogonus Parry and Lissotes Westwood (both Lucaninae: Lucanini), are apterous and their species much more localised. -
Orthoptera: Ensifera)?
Zootaxa 4291 (1): 001–033 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4291.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BD31B828-E7EF-46AD-B618-1BAAA2D63DBD Tackling an intractable problem: Can greater taxon sampling help resolve relationships within the Stenopelmatoidea (Orthoptera: Ensifera)? AMY G. VANDERGAST1,7, DAVID B. WEISSMAN2, DUSTIN A. WOOD3, DAVID C. F. RENTZ4, CORINNA S. BAZELET5 & NORIHIRO UESHIMA6 1U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, San Diego Field Station, 4165 Spruance Road Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92101, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Entomology, California Academy of Sciences, 55 Music Concourse Drive, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 3U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, San Diego Field Station, 4165 Spruance Road Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92101, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 4School of Marine & Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] 5Steinhardt Museum, Tel Aviv University, Department of Zoology, Sherman Building Rm. 403, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Conser- vation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa. E-mail: [email protected] 61435-1 Kubocho, Matsusaka, Mie 515-0044, Japan. E-mail: [email protected] 7Corresponding Author Abstract The relationships among and within the families that comprise the orthopteran superfamily Stenopelmatoidea (suborder Ensifera) remain poorly understood. We developed a phylogenetic hypothesis based on Bayesian analysis of two nuclear ribosomal and one mitochondrial gene for 118 individuals (84 de novo and 34 from GenBank). -
Jerusalem Cricket
Colorado Insect of Interest Jerusalem Cricket Scientific Name: Stenopelmatus fuscus Haldeman Order: Orthoptera (Grasshoppers, Crickets, Katydids, and Relatives) Family: Stenopelmatidae (Jerusalem, Sand or Stone Crickets) Figure 1. Jerusalem Cricket side -view. Photo courtesy of Description and Distinctive Features: Gene Nelson. The Jerusalem crickets (Figure 1, 2, and 3) are arguably one of the most bizarre looking insects you can find in Colorado. They are large insects (about an inch long), flightless with spiny legs. Their bulbous abdomen is often banded but the most noticeable feature is their very large, round and somewhat humanlike head (Figure 2). These odd insects usually attract attention when encountered and are called by many common names including “child of the earth”, “potato bug”, “skull head” and “old bald-headed man”. Distribution in Colorado: Within Colorado, Jerusalem crickets are most common in the western counties bordering Utah. They are also known to occur in extreme southeastern Colorado. Life History and Habits: Jerusalem crickets spend almost their entire life below ground. Females lay eggs in small masses in soil and early stages burrow through the soil. The front legs of Jerusalem crickets are thickened to allow them to dig, and they Figure 2. Jerusalem Cricket head-on view. Photo courtesy of Howard Evans. have large and powerful jaws. Much of their food consists of roots and tubers but they are omnivorous and will eat other insects as well as scavenge dead plant and animal matter. The adult stage is likely reached in about 1 ½ years after eggs hatch. The early instar nymphs remain below ground and periodically molt, which they do on their back.