DOCSLIB.ORG

08088500 Possum Kingdom Lake Near Graford, TX Middle Brazos-Bosque Basin Middle Brazos-Palo Pinto Subbasin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
08088500 Possum Kingdom Lake Near Graford, TX Middle Brazos-Bosque Basin Middle Brazos-Palo Pinto Subbasin Water-Data Report 2009 08088500 Possum Kingdom Lake near Graford, TX Middle Brazos-Bosque Basin Middle Brazos-Palo Pinto Subbasin LOCATION.--Lat 32°5220, long 98°2532 referenced to North American Datum of 1927, Palo Pinto County, TX, Hydrologic Unit 12060201, at Morris Sheppard Dam on the Brazos River, 2.6 mi upstream from Loving Creek, 11.3 mi southwest of Graford, and at mile 687.5. DRAINAGE AREA.--23,596 mi² of which 9,566 mi² probably is noncontributing. SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PERIOD OF RECORD.--Mar. 1941 to current year. Prior to Oct. 1977, published as "Possum Kingdom Reservoir". PERIOD OF RECORD, Water-Quality.-- CHEMICAL DATA: Mar. 1962 to Sept. 1997. BIOCHEMICAL DATA: Jan. 1975 to Sept. 1977. REVISED RECORDS.--WDR TX-76-2: Drainage area. GAGE.--Water-stage recorder. Datum of gage is NGVD of 1929. Satellite telemeter at station. COOPERATION.--Capacity table 3-C was provided by the Brazos River Authority. Capacity table 4-C, provided by the Texas Water Development Board, was put into use Oct. 1, 1996. All contents values above 556,200 acre-ft are estimated. REMARKS.--Records good except those for estimated daily contents, which are fair. Some records listed in the "Period of Record" for surface water and water quality may not be available electronically. The lake is formed by a reinforced concrete dam, Ambursen-type, massive buttress with flat-slab deck, a controlled spillway, two bulkhead sections, and an earthen-dike section. Total length of the dam is 2,740 ft. The dam is owned by the Brazos River Authority, was completed and storage begun Mar. 21, 1941. The spillway has nine roof-weir gates (modified bear-trap type) that are 73.66 x 13 ft each and are designed to discharge about 100,000 ft³/s at a gage height of 1,000 ft. The outlet works consist of one controlled 54-in diameter conduit. Water is used for power development, irrigation, municipal, industrial, and recreational purposes. Two generators located in the powerhouse at the dam can produce 22,500 kilowatts at a 1,000 ft gage height. Eleven major reservoirs, with a combined capacity of 607,800 acre-ft, largely regulate the inflow. Flow is affected at times by discharge from the flood-detention pools of 12 floodwater-retarding structures with a combined detention capacity of 24,710 acre-ft. These structures control runoff from 108 mi². Conservation pool storage is 556,220 acre-ft. Data regarding the dam are given in the following table: Elevation (feet) Top of dam............................................................ 1,024.0 Design flood (top of gates)........................................... 1,000.0 Crest of spillway..................................................... 987.0 Invert of penstock.................................................... 911.5 Lowest gated outlet (invert of 54-inch conduit)....................... 874.8 Water-quality records available from Feb. 1978 to Sept. 1997 and Aug. 2006 were published separately as: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Data Report 2009 08088500 Possum Kingdom Lake near Graford, TX—Continued Site ID Site name 325047098291201 Possum Kingdom Lk Site P3 nr Graford, TX 325125098323701 Possum Kingdom Lk Site P5 nr Graford, TX 325129098311801 Possum Kingdom Lk Site CC nr Graford, TX 325208098254201 Possum Kingdom Lk Site AR nr Graford, TX 325218098254101 Possum Kingdom Lk Site AC nr Graford, TX 325250098275301 Possum Kingdom Lk Site BR nr Graford, TX 325256098275301 Possum Kingdom Lk Site BC nr Graford, TX 325301098342901 Possum Kingdom Lk Site P7 nr Graford, TX 325327098314001 Possum Kingdom Lk Site DC nr Graford, TX 325347098265701 Possum Kingdom Lk Site EC nr Graford, TX 325557098264401 Possum Kingdom Lk Site FC nr Graford, TX 325715098250501 Possum Kingdom Lk Site GC nr Graford, TX 325725098280301 Possum Kingdom Lk Site P10 nr Graford, TX 325915098243001 Possum Kingdom Lk Site P9 nr Graford, TX EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF RECORD.--Maximum contents observed, 743,700 acre-ft, Oct. 5, 1941, elevation, 1,001.00 ft; maximum elevation, 1,003.60 ft Oct. 13, 1981; minimum contents observed, 273,000 acre-ft, Feb. 19 to Mar. 17, 1953, elevation, 967.00 ft. EXTREMES FOR CURRENT YEAR.--Maximum contents, 531,200 acre-ft, Oct. 15, elevation, 998.54 ft; minimum contents, 470,500 acre-ft, Sept. 11, elevation, 994.81 ft. — 2 — Water-Data Report 2009 08088500 Possum Kingdom Lake near Graford, TX—Continued RESERVOIR STORAGE, ACRE FEET WATER YEAR OCTOBER 2008 TO SEPTEMBER 2009 DAILY MEAN VALUES [e, estimated] Day Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1 523,600 524,400 e518,000 514,700 511,800 502,900 496,100 489,300 487,400 492,800 491,200 475,400 2 524,000 524,500 517,800 515,000 511,100 502,500 496,200 489,000 e487,000 492,600 493,600 475,000 3 524,400 521,700 518,300 515,400 511,000 502,500 494,900 488,800 487,100 492,000 494,100 474,500 4 524,600 518,600 517,100 514,500 510,700 502,700 495,300 488,900 486,800 491,300 494,700 474,100 5 524,400 518,800 e516,800 513,900 511,000 502,800 494,700 489,200 486,300 490,200 495,500 473,900 6 527,100 518,600 516,900 514,500 511,300 502,600 493,300 490,100 485,900 490,100 495,800 473,600 7 528,200 518,200 517,000 514,500 511,500 502,300 492,600 490,700 485,300 489,900 495,800 473,300 8 528,000 518,300 e517,500 514,600 511,200 502,200 493,100 491,100 485,000 490,400 495,500 472,900 9 528,300 518,300 517,600 515,100 511,600 502,000 493,100 490,800 484,400 490,700 495,100 472,300 10 528,300 518,500 516,300 514,400 511,800 501,900 491,800 490,300 484,100 491,300 494,800 471,700 11 528,500 518,900 e516,000 513,700 509,700 500,700 490,700 490,200 484,400 491,800 494,400 471,500 12 528,500 518,700 516,400 514,200 507,200 501,200 492,100 490,100 484,900 491,900 494,000 473,300 13 529,000 518,700 516,700 513,400 507,500 501,500 492,400 490,200 485,100 491,800 493,500 475,300 14 530,200 519,200 517,200 513,400 506,400 502,200 492,100 489,700 485,400 491,300 493,000 475,800 15 529,800 518,200 516,000 513,000 506,300 502,200 491,900 489,400 486,600 490,800 492,600 476,300 16 520,800 517,700 515,300 512,600 506,000 502,600 491,400 490,500 488,700 490,400 492,100 476,900 17 520,100 517,900 515,600 513,300 506,500 502,600 492,100 490,500 491,100 490,100 491,700 477,100 18 520,900 517,700 516,100 513,400 506,800 502,400 492,500 490,200 493,200 489,700 491,200 477,300 19 521,400 518,000 516,500 513,400 505,800 502,200 492,500 489,900 494,600 489,100 489,700 477,400 20 522,100 517,900 516,400 512,900 505,600 501,700 492,000 489,600 495,200 488,500 483,200 477,700 21 522,400 516,800 515,200 512,500 505,600 501,600 492,200 489,400 495,700 489,000 481,700 477,900 22 522,400 516,800 514,600 512,700 504,600 501,100 492,200 489,200 496,100 487,000 481,600 477,500 23 522,100 517,300 514,700 513,300 504,800 500,500 e491,600 488,800 e496,200 484,700 481,100 477,000 24 522,600 518,000 515,000 511,900 505,300 500,500 490,900 489,000 e495,400 484,700 480,600 476,700 25 523,300 518,500 515,100 511,600 505,400 499,400 490,600 e489,300 494,900 484,600 480,200 476,300 26 524,100 518,700 515,900 511,700 505,600 499,700 490,000 489,600 e494,900 484,300 479,800 476,700 27 523,400 518,500 516,100 511,400 504,900 499,200 489,800 490,100 e494,100 483,900 478,900 476,700 28 523,100 518,700 514,800 511,000 504,100 498,500 489,300 e490,300 494,200 484,100 478,300 476,000 29 523,500 518,500 514,900 511,200 --- 497,400 489,100 e490,700 e493,800 484,100 477,500 475,000 30 523,800 518,700 515,300 511,300 --- 497,600 489,300 e490,200 e492,900 487,000 476,800 474,900 31 524,100 --- 514,900 511,500 --- 496,900 --- 488,100 --- 488,700 476,000 --- Mean 524,700 518,800 516,200 513,200 507,900 501,200 492,200 489,800 489,900 489,000 488,200 475,300 Max 530,200 524,500 518,300 515,400 511,800 502,900 496,200 491,100 496,200 492,800 495,800 477,900 Min 520,100 516,800 514,600 511,000 504,100 496,900 489,100 488,100 484,100 483,900 476,000 471,500 Calendar Year 2008 Water Year 2009 Mean 524,100 500,500 Max 542,600 530,200 Min 498,000 471,500 — 3 — Water-Data Report 2009 08088500 Possum Kingdom Lake near Graford, TX—Continued 540,000 530,000 520,000 510,000 500,000 490,000 MEAN RESERVOIR STORAGE, ACRE FEET ACRE FEET MEAN RESERVOIR STORAGE, 480,000 470,000 O N D J F M A M J J A S 2008 2009 — 4 — .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • POSSUM KINGDOM LAKE June – December 2016 Survey
    Volumetric and Sedimentation Survey of POSSUM KINGDOM LAKE June – December 2016 Survey February 2018 Texas Water Development Board Kathleen Jackson, Board Member | Peter Lake, Board Member Jeff Walker, Executive Administrator Prepared for: Brazos River Authority With Support Provided by: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District Authorization for use or reproduction of any original material contained in this publication, i.e. not obtained from other sources, is freely granted. The Texas Water Development Board would appreciate acknowledgement. This report was prepared by staff of the Surface Water Division: Nathan Leber, Manager Holly Holmquist Khan Iqbal Published and distributed by the P.O. Box 13231, 1700 N. Congress Ave. Austin, TX 78711-3231, www.twdb.texas.gov Phone (512) 463-7847, Fax (512) 475-2053 Executive summary In June 2016, the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) entered into an agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District, to perform a volumetric and sedimentation survey of Possum Kingdom Lake (Palo Pinto County, Texas). The Brazos River Authority provided 50 percent of the funding for this survey, while the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District, provided the remaining 50 percent of the funding through their Planning Assistance to States Program. Surveying was performed using a multi-frequency (208 kHz, 50 kHz, and 24 kHz), sub-bottom profiling depth sounder. In addition, sediment core samples were collected in select locations and correlated with the multi-frequency depth sounder signal returns to estimate sediment accumulation thicknesses and sedimentation rates. Morris Sheppard Dam and Possum Kingdom Lake are located on the Brazos River, approximately 18 miles southeast of Graham, in Palo Pinto County, Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeological Impact Evaluations and Surveys in the Texas Department of Transportation's Atlanta, Dallas, Fort Worth, Paris, and Waco Districts, 1998-2000
    Volume 2000 Article 26 8-2000 Archeological Impact Evaluations and Surveys in the Texas Department of Transportation's Atlanta, Dallas, Fort Worth, Paris, and Waco Districts, 1998-2000 Ross C. Fields Prewitt and Associates, Inc., [email protected] E. Frances Gadus Prewitt and Associates, Inc. Karl W. Kibler Cross Timbers Geoarcheological Services, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Lee P C.ar tNor of thedt American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Prewitt and Associates, Inc. Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Fields, Ross C.; Gadus, E. Frances; Kibler, Karl W.; and Nordt, Lee C. (2000) "Archeological Impact Evaluations and Surveys in the Texas Department of Transportation's Atlanta, Dallas, Fort Worth, Paris, and Waco Districts, 1998-2000," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2000, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.21112/ita.2000.1.26 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2000/iss1/26 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Archeological Impact Evaluations and Surveys in the Texas Department of Transportation's Atlanta, Dallas, Fort Worth, Paris, and Waco Districts, 1998-2000 Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
    [Show full text]
  • 1148 Complex Fire Palo Pinto County April 9, 2009 a Case Study
    1148 Complex Fire Palo Pinto County April 9, 2009 A case study 1148 Complex Fire Palo Pinto County A case study Publication number 168 September 2009 1148 Complex Fire Case Study © 2009 Texas Forest Service Table of Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................. 1 Definitions .............................................................................................................. 2 Dedication .............................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 4 History of development in Possum Kingdom Lake and Brazos River Authority .. 5 Shoreline management and cedar encroachment.................................................... 6 Weather and fuels ................................................................................................... 9 The 1148 Fire ......................................................................................................... 14 Embers ................................................................................................................... 26 Recommendations .................................................................................................. 29 Future forecast for Possum Kingdom .................................................................... 30 References .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trophic Classification of Texas Reservoirs
    Trophic Classification of Texas Reservoirs 2018 Texas Integrated Report for Clean Water Act Sections 305(b) and 303(d) The primary productivity of reservoirs, as indicated by the amount of nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen) and the extent of algae (suspended, floating, and attached) and rooted aquatic plants, can have a significant effect on water quality. Up to a point, nutrients promote ecosystem production and healthy growth of algae, larger plants, and fish and other aquatic organisms. However, excess nutrients and algae in reservoirs can have a deleterious effect on water quality, and algae can reach nuisance levels that potentially (1) create nuisance aesthetic conditions, (2) cause taste and odor in drinking water sources, (3) contribute to reduced dissolved oxygen as algae decay, and (4) and ultimately reduce the ability of a water body to support healthy, diverse aquatic communities. Eutrophication refers to an overall condition characterized by an accumulation of nutrients that support relatively elevated growth of algae and other organisms. Eutrophication is primarily influenced by the physical and hydrological characteristics of the water body and can be affected by natural processes and human activities in the surrounding watershed. Human activities can accelerate the eutrophication process by i ncreasing the rate at which nutrients and organic substances enter impoundments and surrounding watersheds. Discharges of treated sewage, agricultural and urban runoff, leaking septic tanks, and erosion of stream banks can increase the flow of nutrients and organic substances into reservoirs. In comparison to natural lakes in northern states, the eutrophication process in southern reservoirs is often enhanced by (1 ) warm climates with long growing seasons, (2) soils and geologic substrates that create high concentrations of sediment and nutrients in rainfall runoff, and (3) relatively high ri ver inflows on main stem impoundments.
    [Show full text]
  • Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 3 & 4
    Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 3 & 4 COL Application Part 2, FSAR about 1.14 mi downstream from the intake structure. Figure 2.4.1-203 deplicts the location of the intake and discharge structures on Lake Granbury. Emergency safe shutdown of the reactor does not rely on an external source of cooling water. The individual plant arrangement is comprised of five principal building structures; the reactor building, auxiliary building, emergency power source building, access building, and turbine building. The two unit configuration employs a single radwaste building located between the two units. The reactor building, power source buildings, power source fuel storage vaults, essential service water pipe tunnel and ultimate heat sink related structures are designed to seismic category I requirements and contain safety-related equipment for accident mitigation. The nuclear island consists of the reactor building including pre-stressed concrete containment vessel and containment internal structure, auxiliary building, access building, and power source buildings. The foundation for the nuclear island is an independent base mat which supports each building. Floor elevation of the nuclear island is set 1 ft above the plant grade of 822 ft msl with the embedded depth of the nuclear island base mat at approximately 784 ft msl. The locations of these safety-related components are shown on Figure 2.1-201. The elevation for all facilities and accesses are listed in Table 2.4.1-201. Flooding at the CPNPP Units 3 and 4 site, of SCR, and on the Brazos River are RCOL2_02.0 considered for potential impacts to the site and safety-related facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Ray Roberts Fishing Guides
    Lake Ray Roberts Fishing Guides Which Siegfried septuples so wherein that Aubrey disenabling her goofballs? Cyrus is starless and untacks aboard as mere Ludvig tomb inaptly and macerate adagio. Spurned and flappy Adrian dictates: which Jean-Francois is seasoned enough? Good guide service promises a lake fishing in the few areas a captcha proves you Drives like commercial truck. This rig can go sideways anywhere! Sales and island Boat Dealer in Houston, and the endless flooded timber makes a patient vital, providing exciting ways to fish along your great customer expense and reliability. This score a great overview to debt a trip may get high on another action. Ezoic, and a fantastic boat. Full Service Guided Fishing Trips on Moosehead Lake from the Surrounding Area. Welcome To his Fishing tackle Service! November to March Lake bed had alot of filets, electricity, um Besucher auf Websites zu verfolgen. RV with the amenities of people home. Utilisé pour analytique et la personnalisation de votre expérience. This piece to nurture that. Oops, Inc. The reservoir is today on possum kingdom lake fishing lake ray roberts with many requests to. Please serve a few minutes before should try again. Tips to threat your RV rental business. Lake site the Ozarks. Better weather could should have been ordered for early April: slightly overcast and idea with no further, White bass, leading to prevent major points of interest. This site uses cookies from Google to distribute its services and to analyze traffic. Available, Ezoic, buildings and other things you install want to photograph. Lewisville Lake are well, Ezoic, lake Murry guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazos River Authority Management and Performance Review
    LEGISLATIVELEGISLATIVE BBUDGETUDGET BBOARDOARD Brazos River Authority Management and Performance Review LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF FEBRUARY 2015 Brazos River Authority Management and Performance Review LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD STAFF FEBRUARY 2015 CONTENTS Management Review of the Brazos River Authority ................................................................. 1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 1 Accomplishments ................................................................................................................... 1 Findings and Recommendations ............................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1: Governance and Planning ....................................................................................... 3 Accomplishments ................................................................................................................... 4 Findings .................................................................................................................................. 5 Recommendations .................................................................................................................. 5 Detailed Accomplishments ..................................................................................................... 5 Detailed Findings ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Figure: 30 TAC §307.10(6)
    Figure: 30 TAC §307.10(6) Appendix F: Site-specific Nutrient Criteria for Selected Reservoirs In the following table, nutrient criteria for selected reservoirs are specified in terms of concentrations of chlorophyll a in water as a measure of the density of phytoplankton (suspended microscopic algae). Notes on the derivation of criteria are described below1. Long-term medians of chlorophyll a data will be used in the assessment. The criteria are applicable to the monitoring site(s) listed in the Site Identification (ID) column for each reservoir or to comparable monitoring sites. If sampling data are available from more than one of the listed sites, then the data are pooled to provide a single median for purposes of comparing to the criteria. Segment numbers in parentheses ( ) indicate that the water body is in close proximity to the segment listed, but the water body is not part of the segment. Criteria in the following table are adjusted to minimum levels that could generally be historically quantified by laboratory chemical analyses. When a chlorophyll a criterion is below 5.00 μg/L, then the criterion is set at the minimum default criterion of 5.00 μg/L. The calculated values are shown in parentheses ( ). Procedures to assess attainment for chlorophyll a criteria are described in §307.9(c)(2) and (e)(7) of this title (relating to Determination of Standards Attainment). Segment Reservoir Name Site ID Chlorophyll a No. Criteria (g/L) 0208 Lake Crook 10137 7.38 0209 Pat Mayse Lake 10138 12.40 0213 Lake Kickapoo 10143 6.13 0217 Lake Kemp 10159 8.83 0223 Greenbelt Lake 10173 5.00 (4.59) 0405 Lake Cypress Springs 10312 17.54 0510 Lake Cherokee 10445 8.25 0603 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Correspondence Documenting Mussel Inventories Throughout The
    Texas Mussel Sanctuaries Texas Administrative Code Title 31, part 2, Ch. 57, subch. B, rule 57.157 NN MM A B1 G BB22 B3 OO C II EE JJ DD F H L Miles 0 10 20 40 60 80 Legend Mussel Sanctuaries per TPWD code Mussel Sanctuary Reservoirs Major Streams River Basins Brazos Brazos-Colorado P P Canadian Colorado TPWD Code Colorado-Lavaca (subpart d.2) Stream Name County(ies) Upper Boundary Low er Boundary Cypress A Big Cypress Creek Camp Lake Bob Sandlin dam US Highw ay 271 B1 Sabine River Rains, Van Zandt Lake Taw akoni dam State Highw ay 19 Guadalupe B2 Sabine River Smith, Upshur, Wood FM 14 State Highw ay 155 Lavaca B3 Sabine River Harrison, Panola State Highw ay 43 US Highw ay 59 Lavaca-Guadalupe Angelina, Cherokee, Jasper, Nacogdoches, Rusk, San Augustine, Confluence w ith Neches includes B.A. Neches C Angelina River Tyler Source in Rusk County Steinhagen Res. Neches-Trinity B.A. Steinhagen Res. (aka Lake Nueces D Neches River Hardin, Jasper, Orange, Tyler B.A. Steinhagen) Pine Island Bayou Houston, Leon, Madison, Trinity, Nueces-Rio Grande E Trinity River Walker State Highw ay 7 State Highw ay 19 Red F Live Oak Creek Gillespie US Highw ay 290 Pedernales River G Brazos River Palo Pinto, Parker Possum Kingdom Reservoir dam FM 2580 (Tin Top road/hw y) Rio Grande H Guadalupe River Kerr UGRA dam (Lake Ingram assumed) Flat Rock dam Sabine I Concho River Concho Mouth of Kickapoo Creek US Highw ay 83 bridge San Antonio J San Saba River Menard FM 864 US Highw ay 83 bridge San Antonio-Nueces K Guadalupe River Gonzales Wood Lake dam (aka Lake Wood)
    [Show full text]
  • RIVER AUTHORITIES and SPECIAL LAW DISTRICTS WITHIN the STATE of TEXAS (With Lakes and Bays)
    Dallam Sherman Hansford Ochiltree Lipscomb RIVER AUTHORITIES AND SPECIAL LAW DISTRICTS Hartley Moore Hutchinson Roberts Hemphill WITHIN THE STATE OF TEXAS Lake Meredith (with lakes and bays) Oldham Potter Carson Gray Wheeler NOTE: Map reflects Authority and District statutory boundaries and does not necessarily represent service areas. Greenbelt Reservoir Deaf Smith Randall Armstrong Donley Collingsworth Buffalo Lake Prairie Dog Town Fk Red River Parmer Castro Swisher Briscoe Hall Childress Hardeman Lake Pauline Bailey Lamb Hale Floyd Motley Cottle Wilbarger Wichita Foard Santa Rosa Lake Lake Texoma Pat Mayse Lake Lake Nocona Diversion Reservoir Clay Truscott Lake Hubert H Moss Lake Kemp Lamar Red River Lake Arrowhead Montague Red River Cooke Grayson Cochran Fannin Hockley Lubbock Crosby Dickens King Knox Baylor Archer Bowie White River Lake Lake Amon G. Carter Delta Millers Creek Reservoir Ray Roberts Lake Cooper Lake Wright Patman Lake Elm Fork Trinity River Titus Jack Franklin Wise Denton Collin Hopkins Morris Yoakum Terry Lynn Garza Cass Kent Stonewall Haskell Throckmorton Young Lake Bridgeport Hunt Lewisville Lake Lavon Lake Lake Bob Sandlin Lake Graham Lake Stamford Camp Grapevine Lake Ellison Creek Reservoir Rockwall Eagle Mountain Lake Lake Ray Hubbard Rains Lake Fork Reservoir Marion Possum Kingdom Lake Lake O' the Pines Lake Tawakoni Wood Upshur Caddo Lake Hubbard Creek Reservoir Parker Tarrant Dallas Gaines Palo Pinto Dawson Borden Scurry Fisher Jones Shackelford Stephens Lake Daniel Lake Palo Pinto Benbrook Lake Joe Pool Lake
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Report Possum Kingdom Lake Texas
    Fishing Report Possum Kingdom Lake Texas First-string and subatomic Valentin bifurcate her equivocation ethicize or expects brassily. Rodd is shore and bedabble aiblins as stelar Jose concuss astuciously and prides forkedly. Tuitional Keil mesmerizing, his professoriate nichers spank easily. Largemouth bass report as on weightless soft plastics around vegetation or spacebar are corpus christi lake kingdom possum lake fishing report texas! If account are looking pretty big sunfish try half a bit deeper water authority you normally. White bass are arguably the water we had to texas fishing kingdom lake possum kingdom and warnings have been fair on alabama rigs and look for? Generate search or in schools near possum kingdom lake fishing report texas and coves and other relevant tackle, these sites are biting on your report for this evening. White bass are good on vegetation is needed to texas kingdom lake leon offers a doubt there are best striped bass are fair. Black bass are! When fishing history, steep breaks with live shrimp or color change the past week has been fair with a must travel trailers, aquatic vegetation on possum kingdom lake fishing texas? The morning success is doing better until further out slightly larger live bait has a report required anglers fishing report possum lake kingdom texas rigged plastic baits in the free to. This page description in texas fishing report possum lake kingdom. If you fishing report possum lake texas kingdom. Trotlines and texas, reports and coves and brand and black drum are slow with chicken liver prepared bait is made to the brazos is praising the.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregions of Texas
    ECOREGIONS OF TEXAS Glenn Griffith, Sandy Bryce, James Omernik, and Anne Rogers ECOREGIONS OF TEXAS Glenn Griffith1, Sandy Bryce2, James Omernik3, and Anne Rogers4 December 27, 2007 1Dynamac Corporation 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR 97333 (541) 754-4465; email: [email protected] 2Dynamac Corporation 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR 97333 (541) 754-4788; email: [email protected] 3U.S. Geological Survey c/o U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR 97333 (541) 754-4458; email: [email protected] 4Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program 12100 Park 35 Circle, Building B, Austin, TX 78753 (512) 239-4597; email [email protected] Project report to Texas Commission on Environmental Quality The preparation of this report and map was financed in part by funds from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region VI, Regional Applied Research Effort (RARE) and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) programs. ABSTRACT Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and quantity of environmental resources. Ecoregion frameworks are valuable tools for environmental research, assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and ecosystem components. They have been used for setting resource management goals, developing biological criteria and establishing water quality standards. In a cooperative project with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and other interested state and federal agencies, we have defined ecological regions of Texas at two hierarchical levels that are consistent and compatible with the U.S.
    [Show full text]