DOCSLIB.ORG

Correspondence Documenting Mussel Inventories Throughout The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Correspondence Documenting Mussel Inventories Throughout The Texas Mussel Sanctuaries Texas Administrative Code Title 31, part 2, Ch. 57, subch. B, rule 57.157 NN MM A B1 G BB22 B3 OO C II EE JJ DD F H L Miles 0 10 20 40 60 80 Legend Mussel Sanctuaries per TPWD code Mussel Sanctuary Reservoirs Major Streams River Basins Brazos Brazos-Colorado P P Canadian Colorado TPWD Code Colorado-Lavaca (subpart d.2) Stream Name County(ies) Upper Boundary Low er Boundary Cypress A Big Cypress Creek Camp Lake Bob Sandlin dam US Highw ay 271 B1 Sabine River Rains, Van Zandt Lake Taw akoni dam State Highw ay 19 Guadalupe B2 Sabine River Smith, Upshur, Wood FM 14 State Highw ay 155 Lavaca B3 Sabine River Harrison, Panola State Highw ay 43 US Highw ay 59 Lavaca-Guadalupe Angelina, Cherokee, Jasper, Nacogdoches, Rusk, San Augustine, Confluence w ith Neches includes B.A. Neches C Angelina River Tyler Source in Rusk County Steinhagen Res. Neches-Trinity B.A. Steinhagen Res. (aka Lake Nueces D Neches River Hardin, Jasper, Orange, Tyler B.A. Steinhagen) Pine Island Bayou Houston, Leon, Madison, Trinity, Nueces-Rio Grande E Trinity River Walker State Highw ay 7 State Highw ay 19 Red F Live Oak Creek Gillespie US Highw ay 290 Pedernales River G Brazos River Palo Pinto, Parker Possum Kingdom Reservoir dam FM 2580 (Tin Top road/hw y) Rio Grande H Guadalupe River Kerr UGRA dam (Lake Ingram assumed) Flat Rock dam Sabine I Concho River Concho Mouth of Kickapoo Creek US Highw ay 83 bridge San Antonio J San Saba River Menard FM 864 US Highw ay 83 bridge San Antonio-Nueces K Guadalupe River Gonzales Wood Lake dam (aka Lake Wood) Confluence w ith San Marcos River L San Marcos River Hays, Guadalupe, Gonzales Source at San Marcos Springs Confluence w ith Guadalupe River San Jacinto M Pine Creek Lamar, Red River Source in Lamar County Confluence w ith Red River San Jacinto-Brazos N Sanders Creek Fannin, Lamar Source in Fannin County Confluence w ith Red River Sulphur O Elm Creek Runnels, Taylor Source in Taylor County Elm Creek Lake dam in Ballinger Columbia Bridge (aka Trinity P Rio Grande Webb Laredo/Colombia Solidarity Bridge) Webb/Zapata county line Trinity-San Jacinto common name species Shell Condition Date N alive N shells N Shells kept N valves Valves kept Lampsilis teres very-recently yellow sandshell 1 dead 27-Aug-98 Leptodea fragilis fragile papershell 1 recently dead 27-Aug-98 Potamilus ohiensis very-recently pink papershell 1 dead 27-Aug-98 Toxolasma parvus relatively- lilliput 1 recently dead 27-Aug-98 Leptodea fragilis very-recently to recently fragile papershell 2 dead 14-Aug-99 Leptodea fragilis recently to fragile papershell 3 long dead 15-Aug-99 bleufer Potamilus purpuratus 1 1 1 1 relatively 25-May-05 recently dead giant floater Pyganodon grandis 1 1 recently dead 25-May-05 Texas Truncilla macrodon 1 1 very long dead 25-May-05 fawnsfoot Tampico Cyrtonaias tampicoensis 2222relatively- 21-Jan-06 Pearlymussel recently to long dead yellow sandshell Lampsilis teres 11long dead 21-Jan-06 pond mussel Ligumia subrostrata 11 lond dead 21-Jan-06 pink papershell Potamilus ohiensis 11 long dead 21-Jan-06 southern Quadrula apiculata 3110relatively- 21-Jan-06 mapleleaf recently dead Texas Truncilla macrodon 11long dead 21-Jan-06 fawnsfoot Tampico Cyrtonaias tampicoensis 33long to very-long 22-Apr-06 pearlymussel dead yellow sandshell Lampsilis teres 1111long dead to 22-Apr-06 subfossil fragile papershell Leptodea fragilis 1122relatively- 22-Apr-06 recently dead giant floater Pyganodon grandis 11recently dead 22-Apr-06 southern Quadrula apiculata 11 long dead 22-Apr-06 mapleleaf Texas Truncilla macrodon 66relatively- 22-Apr-06 fawnsfoot recently to very- long dead 11 southern mapleleaf Quadrula apiculata recently dead 2-Dec-07 11 Texas very-long fawnsfoot Truncilla macrodon dead 2-Dec-07 30 very-long bleufer Potamilus purpuratus dead 2-Dec-07 1040 long to very- pink papershell Potamilus ohiensis long dead 2-Dec-07 50 long to very- yellow sandshell Lampsilis teres long dead 2-Dec-07 3 0 10 0 recently to Tampico very-long pearlymussel Cyrtonaias tampicoensis dead 2-Dec-07 Leptodea fragilis fragile papershell 1 not recorded 2-Nov-98 Lampsilis teres recently to yellow sandshell 4 long dead 18-Jan-99 Potamilus purpuratus relatively- bleufer 2 recently dead 18-Jan-99 Quadrula apiculata southern recently to mapleleaf 6 long dead 18-Jan-99 1111 long to very- yellow sandshell Lampsilis teres long dead 29-Dec-07 44 Tampico long to very- pearlymussel Cyrtonaias tampicoensis long dead 29-Dec-07 20 Tampico very-long pearlymussel Cyrtonaias tampicoensis dead 31-Aug-08 yellow sandshell Lampsilis teres 12 12 very recently 18-Sep-08 dead 22relatively- 17-Sep-08 recently to fragile papershell Leptodea fragilis long dead southern 11 17-Sep-08 mapleleaf Quadrula apiculata long dead bleufer Potamilus purpuratus 11long dead 17-Sep-08 tapered Uniomerus declivis 11long dead 17-Sep-08 pondhorn pink papershell Potamilus ohiensis 11long dead 17-Sep-08 pondhorn Uniomerus species 3 3 19 19 very-long dead 17-Sep-08 species Texas lilliput Toxolasmus texasiensis 13 13 very-long dead 17-Sep-08 yellow sandshell Lampsilis teres 1122relatively- 16-Sep-08 recently to very- long dead tapered 1188 16-Sep-08 pondhorn Uniomerus declivis long dead 77long to very- 16-Sep-08 Texas lilliput Toxolasmus texasiensis long dead 11 relatively- giant floater Pyganodon grandis recently dead 19-Sep-08 33very-long fragile papershell Leptodea fragilis dead 18-Sep-08 3221111recently to very-long yellow sandshell Lampsilis teres dead 18-Sep-08 22very-long southern dead to mapleleaf Quadrula apiculata subfossil 18-Sep-08 tapered 1 1 10 10 very-lond pondhorn Uniomerus declivis dead 18-Sep-08 11very-long lilliput Toxolasma parvus dead 18-Sep-08 11very-long pistolgrip Tritogonia verrucosa dead 18-Sep-08 1155relatively- recently to very-long fragile papershell Leptodea fragilis dead 18-Sep-08 1144 recently to very-long yellow sandshell Lampsilis teres dead 14-Dec-08 11 bleufer Potamilus purpuratus long dead 14-Dec-08 giant floater Pyganodon grandis 11 long dead 14-Dec-08 Texas lilliput Toxolasma texasiensis 1122relatively- recently to long dead 14-Dec-08 southern Quadrula apiculata 22long dead 2-Jan-09 mapleleaf Texas lilliput Toxolasma texasiensis 11relatively- 2-Jan-09 recently dead giant floater Pyganodon grandis 1 1 relatively 19-Aug-00 recently dead paper pondshell Utterbackia imbecillis 1 recently dead 19-Aug-00 yellow sandshell Lampsilis teres 1 long dead 19-Aug-00 bluefer Potamilus purpuratus 1 recently dead 19-Aug-00 southern Quadrula apiculata 1 4 relatively 19-Aug-00 mapleleaf recently dead smooth Quadrula houstonensis 1 relatively 19-Aug-00 pimpleback recently dead tapered Uniomerus declivis 1 long dead 19-Aug-00 pondhorn Tampico Cyrtonaias tampicoensis 1 very long 28-Jun-03 pearlymussel dead fragile papershell Leptodea fragilis 1 1 Relatively 28-Jun-03 recently to very long dead Pistolgrip Tritogonia verrucosa 3 recently to 28-Jun-03 long dead paper pondshell Utterbackia imbecillis 143 recently dead 10-Jun-06 bleufer Potamilus purpuratus 11 recently dead 12-Aug-06 giant floater Pyganodon grandis 10 50 2 50 1 recently to long 12-Aug-06 dead paper pondshell Utterbackia imbecillis 11 long dead 12-Aug-06 paper pondshell Utterbackia imbecillis 44recently dead 30-Sep-06 giant floater Pyganodon grandis 11 recently dead 30-Sep-06 11 relatively- fragile papershell Leptodea fragilis recently dead 24-Nov-06 11 giant floater Pyganodon grandis long dead 24-Nov-06 11 yellow sandshell Lampsilis teres recently dead 28-Dec-06 12 0 giant floater Pyganodon grandis not given 27-Jan-07 44 relatively- recently to paper pondshell Utterbackia imbecillis long dead 27-Jan-07 1111 relatively- yellow sandshell Lampsilis teres recently dead 27-Jan-07 22 recently - southern relatively- mapleleaf Quadrula apiculata recently dead 27-Jan-07 11 yellow sandshell Lampsilis teres long dead 27-Jan-07 11 Tampico very-long pearlymussel Cyrtonaias tampicoensis dead 27-Jan-07 12 12 giant floater Pyganodon grandis not given 27-Jan-07 11 relatively- bleufer Potamilus purpuratus recently dead 27-Jan-07 11 yellow sandshell Lampsilis teres recently dead 27-Jan-07 6600 recently to very-long yellow sandshell Lampsilis teres dead 4-Feb-07 3300relatively- recently to very-long bleufer Potamilus purpuratus dead 4-Feb-07 1100 southern relatively- mapleleaf Quadrula apiculata recently dead 4-Feb-07 4400 recently to smooth relatively- pimpleback Quadrula houstonensis recently dead 4-Feb-07 1100 Tampico very-long pearlymussel Cyrtonaias tampicoensis dead 4-Feb-07 5500 recently to yellow sandshell Lampsilis teres long dead 4-Feb-07 2200 relatively- recently to bleufer Potamilus purpuratus long dead 4-Feb-07 54 0 57 0 recently to giant floater Pyganodon grandis long dead 18-Feb-07 20 8 1 0 recently to paper pondshell Utterbackia imbecillis long dead 18-Feb-07 59 1 36 0 recently to giant floater Pyganodon grandis long dead 18-Feb-07 30 0 0 0 recently to paper pondshell Utterbackia imbecillis long dead 18-Feb-07 10 recently to yellow sandshell Lampsilis teres long dead 18-Feb-07 1010 recently to bleufer Potamilus purpuratus long dead 18-Feb-07 22 recently to southern relatively- mapleleaf Quadrula apiculata recently dead 18-Feb-07 2233 relatively- recently to bleufer Potamilus purpuratus long dead 18-Feb-07 1111 relatively- Tampico recently to pearlymussel Cyrtonaias tampicoensis long dead 18-Feb-07 30 30 44 44 recently to southern very-long mapleleaf Quadrula apiculata dead 18-Feb-07 11 paper pondshell Utterbackia imbecillis long dead 18-Feb-07 4411relatively- recently to smooth very-long pimpleback Quadrula houstonensis
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Handbook of Texas Cretaceous Fossils
    University of Texas Bulletin No. 2838: October 8, 1928 HANDBOOK OF TEXAS CRETACEOUS FOSSILS B y W. S. ADKINS Bureau of Economic Geology J. A. Udden, Director E. H. Sellards, Associate Director PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY FOUR TIMES A MONTH, AND ENTERED AS SECOND-CLASS MATTER AT THE POSTOFFICE AT AUSTIN, TEXAS. UNDER THE ACT OF AUGUST 24. 1912 The benefits of education and of useful knowledge, generally diffused through a community, are essential to the preservation of a free govern­ m en t. Sam Houston Cultivated mind is the guardian genius of democracy. It is the only dictator that freemen acknowl­ edge and the only security that free­ men desire. Mirabeau В. Lamar CONTENTS P age Introduction __________________________________________________ 5 Summary of Formation Nomenclature_______________________ 6 Zone Markers and Correlation_______________________________ 8 Types of Texas Cretaceous Fossils___________________________ 36 Bibliography ________________________________________________ 39 L ist and Description of Species_________________________________ 46 P lants ______________________________________________________ 46 Thallophytes ______________________________________________ 46 Fungi __________________________________________________ 46 Algae __________________________________________________ 47 Pteridophytes ____________________________________________ 47 Filices __________________________________________________ 47 Spermatophytes __________________________________________ 47 Gymnospermae _________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • HOW MUCH WATER IS in the PEDERNALES? Determining the Source of Base Flow to the Pedernales River in Northern Blanco, Hays and Travis Counties
    HOW MUCH WATER IS IN THE PEDERNALES? Determining the Source of Base Flow to the Pedernales River in Northern Blanco, Hays and Travis Counties The Meadows Center for Water and the Environment September 2017 Douglas A. Wierman P.G., Lead Author, Fellow Jenna Walker, M.A.Geo., Contributor Ronald Fieseler, P.G., Contributor Jeff Watson, Contributor Alex Broun, P.G., Contributor Stacey Haddad, Contributor Joshua Schauer, Contributor This publication was made possible through the generous support of The Cynthia & George Mitchell Foundation. HOW MUCH WATER IS IN THE PEDERNALES? Determining the Source of Base Flow to the Pedernales River in Northern Blanco, Hays and Travis Counties Performing Agency: Texas State University, and Meadows Center for Water and the Environment Douglas A. Wierman, P.G.¹, Lead Author, Fellow Ronald Fieseler, P.G.², Contributor Jeff Watson³, Contributor Alex Broun, P.G.³, Contributor Jenna Walker, M.A.Geo.¹, Contributor Stacey Haddad¹, Contributor Joshua Schauer¹, Contributor Michael Jones¹, GIS and Graphics Dyhanara Rios¹, Graphic Design ¹ The Meadows Center for Water and the Environment, Texas State University ² Blanco-Pedernales Groundwater Conservation District ³ Hays Trinity Groundwater Conservation District September 2017 601 University Drive, San Marcos TX 78666 512.245.9200 | [email protected] | www.MeadowsWater.org TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures and Tables 2 List of Acronyms 3 Executive Summary 4 Background and Purpose 4 Study Area 4 Scope of Project 5 Results 6 Conclusions 12 Acknowledgements 13
    [Show full text]
  • POSSUM KINGDOM LAKE June – December 2016 Survey
    Volumetric and Sedimentation Survey of POSSUM KINGDOM LAKE June – December 2016 Survey February 2018 Texas Water Development Board Kathleen Jackson, Board Member | Peter Lake, Board Member Jeff Walker, Executive Administrator Prepared for: Brazos River Authority With Support Provided by: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District Authorization for use or reproduction of any original material contained in this publication, i.e. not obtained from other sources, is freely granted. The Texas Water Development Board would appreciate acknowledgement. This report was prepared by staff of the Surface Water Division: Nathan Leber, Manager Holly Holmquist Khan Iqbal Published and distributed by the P.O. Box 13231, 1700 N. Congress Ave. Austin, TX 78711-3231, www.twdb.texas.gov Phone (512) 463-7847, Fax (512) 475-2053 Executive summary In June 2016, the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) entered into an agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District, to perform a volumetric and sedimentation survey of Possum Kingdom Lake (Palo Pinto County, Texas). The Brazos River Authority provided 50 percent of the funding for this survey, while the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District, provided the remaining 50 percent of the funding through their Planning Assistance to States Program. Surveying was performed using a multi-frequency (208 kHz, 50 kHz, and 24 kHz), sub-bottom profiling depth sounder. In addition, sediment core samples were collected in select locations and correlated with the multi-frequency depth sounder signal returns to estimate sediment accumulation thicknesses and sedimentation rates. Morris Sheppard Dam and Possum Kingdom Lake are located on the Brazos River, approximately 18 miles southeast of Graham, in Palo Pinto County, Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Concho River & Upper Colorado River Basins
    CONCHO RIVER & UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASINS Brush Control Feasibility Study Prepared By The: UPPER COLORADO RIVER AUTHORITY In Cooperation with TEXAS STATE SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION BOARD and TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY December 2000 Cover Photograph: Rocky Creek located in Irion County, Texas following restoration though a comprehensive brush control program. Photo courtesy of United States Natural Resources Conservation Services. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The preparation of this report is the result of action by many state, federal and local entities and of many individuals dedicated to the preservation and enhancement of water resources within the State of Texas. This report is one of several funded by the Legislature of Texas to be implemented by the Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board during FYE2000. We commend the Texas Legislature for its’ extraordinary insight and boldness in moving ahead with planning that will be critical to water supply provision in future decades. In particular, the efforts of State Representative Robert Junell are especially recognized for his vision in coordinating the initial feasibility study conducted on the North Concho River and his support for studies of additional watershed basins in Texas. The following individuals are recognized as having made substantial contributions to this study and preparation of this report: Arlan Youngblood Ben Wilde Bill Tullos Billy Williams Bob Buckley Bob Jennings Bob Northcutt Brent Murphy C. Wade Clifton C.J. Robinson Carl Schlinke David Wilson Don Davis Eddy Spurgin Edwin Garner Gary Askins Tommy Morrison Woody Anderson Gary Grogan Howard Morrison J.P. Bach James Moore Jessie Whitlow Jimmy Sterling Joe Dean Weatherby Joe Funk John Anderson John Walker Johnny Oswald Keith Collom Kevin Spreen Kevin Wagner Lad Lithicum Lisa Barker Marjorie Mathis Max S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 307: Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (4/9/2008)
    Revisions to §307 - Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (updated November 12, 2009) EPA has not approved the revised definition of “surface water in the state” in the TX WQS, which includes an area out 10.36 miles into the Gulf of Mexico. Under the CWA, Texas does not have jurisdiction to regulate water standards more than three miles from the coast. Therefore, EPA’s approval of the items in the enclosure recognizes the state’s authority under the CWA out to three miles in the Gulf of Mexico, but does not extend past that point. Beyond three miles, EPA retains authority for CWA purposes EPA’s approval also does not include the application the TX WQS for the portions of the Red River and Lake Texoma that are located within the state of Oklahoma. Finally, EPA is not approving the TX WQS for those waters or portions of waters located in Indian Country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. The following sections have been approved by EPA and are therefore effective for CWA purposes: • §307.1. General Policy Statement • §307.2. Description of Standards • §307.3. Definitions and Abbreviations (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.4. General Criteria • §307.5. Antidegradation • §307.6. Toxic Materials. (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.7. Site-specific Uses and Criteria (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.8. Application of Standards • §307.9. Determination of Standards Attainment • Appendix C - Segment Descriptions • Appendix D - Site-specific Receiving Water Assessments The following sections have been partially approved by EPA: • Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Water Monitor the WATER MONITOR Fall 2009/Winter 2010 Volume 2, Issue 2
    Page 1 The Water Monitor THE WATER MONITOR Fall 2009/Winter 2010 Volume 2, Issue 2 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality-Water Quality Planning Division TCEQ’s New Office of Water INSIDE THIS ISSUE By TCEQ Media Relations TCEQ’s New Office of Water 1 The TCEQ recently announced the formation of a new Updates from the SWQM Program 1 Office of Water, effective December 1st, 2009. The new USIBWC CRP Photo Gallery 2 office encompasses the three existing major water Annual SWQM Workshop Wrap-up 2 divisions in the agency: Water Planning, Water Supply, Oso Bay Cleanup 3 and Water Quality. Oso Bay Water Quality 3 The Circle of Life 5 L’Oreal Stepney will serve as deputy director of the new Master Plan for the Oso Bay Watershed 5 Office of Water. She has served with the TCEQ and Should You Measure Chlorine Residual in the Field 6 predecessor agencies since 1992 in air permitting and Addressing Bacteria Issues on the Rio Grande 7 wastewater permitting, as Water Quality Division director, Critter of the Quarter 8 and most recently as assistant deputy director for the EPA Releases First-Ever Baseline Study of US Lakes 9 Office of Permitting and Registration. She holds a Photo Gallery 10 master’s degree in Environmental Engineering from the University of Texas. former Rio Grande Watermaster Carlos Rubinstein. “Our agency’s response to the people and communities that “The new office is in recognition of the fact that the suffered from this event was extraordinary, and this new state’s population is expected to double in the next 30 Office of Water will ensure that we provide an even years, so the agency must put even more focus on water higher and more focused level of response.” “Water issues to ensure that there will be adequate water quality planning, water supply, and water quality are all issues and quantity for future demand,” said Chairman Bryan W.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch
    Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Texans Outdoors: An Analysis of 1985 Participation in Outdoor Recreation Activities By Kathryn N. Nichols and Andrew P. Goldbloom Under the Direction of James A. Deloney November, 1989 Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, Texas 78744 (512) 389-4900 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Conducting a mail survey requires accuracy and timeliness in every single task. Each individualized survey had to be accounted for, both going out and coming back. Each mailing had to meet a strict deadline. The authors are indebted to all the people who worked on this project. The staff of the Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division, deserve special thanks. This dedicated crew signed letters, mailed, remailed, coded, and entered the data of a twenty-page questionnaire that was sent to over twenty-five thousand Texans with over twelve thousand returned completed. Many other Parks Division staff outside the branch volunteered to assist with stuffing and labeling thousands of envelopes as deadlines drew near. We thank the staff of the Information Services Section for their cooperation in providing individualized letters and labels for survey mailings. We also appreciate the dedication of the staff in the mailroom for processing up­ wards of seventy-five thousand pieces of mail. Lastly, we thank the staff in the print shop for their courteous assistance in reproducing the various documents. Although the above are gratefully acknowledged, they are absolved from any responsibility for any errors or omissions that may have occurred. ii TEXANS OUTDOORS: AN ANALYSIS OF 1985 PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Classified Stream Segments and Assessments Units Covered by Hb 4146
    CLASSIFIED STREAM SEGMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS UNITS COVERED BY HB 4146 SEG ID River Basin Description Met criteria 0216 Red Wichita River Below Lake Kemp Dam 96.43% 0222 Red Salt Fork Red River 95.24% 0224 Red North Fork Red River 90.91% 1250 Brazos South Fork San Gabriel River 93.75% 1251 Brazos North Fork San Gabriel River 93.55% 1257 Brazos Brazos River Below Lake Whitney 90.63% 1415 Colorado Llano River 94.39% 1424 Colorado Middle Concho/South Concho River 95.24% 1427 Colorado Onion Creek 93.43% 1430 Colorado Barton Creek 98.25% 1806 Guadalupe Guadalupe River Above Canyon Lake 96.37% 1809 Guadalupe Lower Blanco River 95.83% 1811 Guadalupe Comal River 98.90% 1812 Guadalupe Guadalupe River Below Canyon Dam 96.98% 1813 Guadalupe Upper Blanco River 95.45% 1815 Guadalupe Cypress Creek 99.19% 1816 Guadalupe Johnson Creek 97.30% AU ID River Basin Description Met criteria 1817 Guadalupe North Fork Guadalupe River 100.00% 1414_01 Colorado Pedernales River 93.10% 1818 Guadalupe South Fork Guadalupe River 97.30% 1414_03 Colorado Pedernales River 91.38% 1905 San Antonio Medina River Above Medina Lake 100.00% 1416_05 Colorado San Saba River 100.00% 2111 Nueces Upper Sabinal River 100.00% Colorado River Below Lady Bird Lake 2112 Nueces Upper Nueces River 95.96% 1428_03 Colorado (formally Town Lake) 91.67% 2113 Nueces Upper Frio River 100.00% Medina River Below Medina 1903_04 San Antonio Diversion Lake 90.00% 2114 Nueces Hondo Creek 93.48% Medina River Below Medina 2115 Nueces Seco Creek 95.65% 1903_05 San Antonio Diversion Lake 96.84% 2309 Rio Grande Devils River 96.67% 1908_02 San Antonio Upper Cibolo Creek 97.67% 2310 Rio Grande Lower Pecos River 93.88% 2304_10 Rio Grande Rio Grande Below Amistad Reservoir 95.95% 2313 Rio Grande San Felipe Creek 95.45% 2311_01 Rio Grande Upper Pecos River 92.86% A detailed map of covered segments and assessment units can be found on the TCEQ website https://www.tceq.texas.gov/gis/nonpoint-source-project-viewer .
    [Show full text]
  • Archeological Impact Evaluations and Surveys in the Texas Department of Transportation's Atlanta, Dallas, Fort Worth, Paris, and Waco Districts, 1998-2000
    Volume 2000 Article 26 8-2000 Archeological Impact Evaluations and Surveys in the Texas Department of Transportation's Atlanta, Dallas, Fort Worth, Paris, and Waco Districts, 1998-2000 Ross C. Fields Prewitt and Associates, Inc., [email protected] E. Frances Gadus Prewitt and Associates, Inc. Karl W. Kibler Cross Timbers Geoarcheological Services, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Lee P C.ar tNor of thedt American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Prewitt and Associates, Inc. Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Fields, Ross C.; Gadus, E. Frances; Kibler, Karl W.; and Nordt, Lee C. (2000) "Archeological Impact Evaluations and Surveys in the Texas Department of Transportation's Atlanta, Dallas, Fort Worth, Paris, and Waco Districts, 1998-2000," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2000, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.21112/ita.2000.1.26 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2000/iss1/26 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Archeological Impact Evaluations and Surveys in the Texas Department of Transportation's Atlanta, Dallas, Fort Worth, Paris, and Waco Districts, 1998-2000 Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notice of the Adoption of County Road Map
    PUBLIC NOTICE OF THE ADOPTION OF COUNTY ROAD MAP Pursuant to Article 258.005 of the Texas Transportation Code, the Commissioners Court of Walker County, Texas provides this notice to the public of the adoption of a County Road Map on December 22, 2008, including each road in which the County claims the continued existence of a public interest and right of access and egress for maintenance of an existing County Road. A County Road Map including each road or portions of each road in which the County claims a public interest is available for inspection at the County Clerk’s Office at the Walker County Courthouse. The Commissioners Court conducted numerous hearings prior to the adoption of the County Road Map on December 22, 2008. A list of the roads included in the adoption is included herein; however, the failure to include a road in which the county has previously acquired a public interest by purchase, condemnation, dedication, or a court's final judgment of adverse possession, or any other legal means does not affect the status of the omitted road. A person asserting a private right, title, or interest in a road in which the existence of a public interest is asserted may contest the inclusion of the road in the county road map by filing a suit in a district court in the county in which the road is located not later than January 1, 2018, said date exceeding the second anniversary of the date of this final notice. A.R. KIRK BOB HARDY RANCH RD. CEDAR RIDGE DELAWARE FARRIS CEMETERY RD.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management Program 2013-2018 Appendix A
    Appendix A 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) As required under Sections 303(d) and 304(a) of the federal Clean Water Act, this list identifies the water bodies in or bordering Texas for which effluent limitations are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards, and for which the associated pollutants are suitable for measurement by maximum daily load. In addition, the TCEQ also develops a schedule identifying Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) that will be initiated in the next two years for priority impaired waters. Issuance of permits to discharge into 303(d)-listed water bodies is described in the TCEQ regulatory guidance document Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (January 2003, RG-194). Impairments are limited to the geographic area described by the Assessment Unit and identified with a six or seven-digit AU_ID. A TMDL for each impaired parameter will be developed to allocate pollutant loads from contributing sources that affect the parameter of concern in each Assessment Unit. The TMDL will be identified and counted using a six or seven-digit AU_ID. Water Quality permits that are issued before a TMDL is approved will not increase pollutant loading that would contribute to the impairment identified for the Assessment Unit. Explanation of Column Headings SegID and Name: The unique identifier (SegID), segment name, and location of the water body. The SegID may be one of two types of numbers. The first type is a classified segment number (4 digits, e.g., 0218), as defined in Appendix A of the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (TSWQS).
    [Show full text]
  • San Angelo Project History
    San Angelo Project Jennifer E. Zuniga Bureau of Reclamation 1999 Table of Contents The San Angelo Project.........................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Project Authorization.....................................................4 Construction History .....................................................7 Post Construction History ................................................12 Settlement of Project Lands ...............................................16 Project Benefits and Use of Project Water ...................................16 Conclusion............................................................17 About the Author .............................................................17 Bibliography ................................................................18 Archival and Manuscript Collections .......................................18 Government Documents .................................................18 Articles...............................................................18 Books ................................................................18 Index ......................................................................19 1 The San Angelo Project The San Angelo Project is a multipurpose project in the Concho River Basin of west- central Texas. In a region historically known for intermittent droughts and floods, the project provides protection against both weather extremes.
    [Show full text]