DOCSLIB.ORG

Archaeological Findings from an Historic Caddo Site (41AN184) in Anderson County, Texas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archaeological Findings from an Historic Caddo Site (41AN184) in Anderson County, Texas View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by SFA ScholarWorks Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State Volume 2010 Article 24 2010 Archaeological Findings from an Historic Caddo Site (41AN184) in Anderson County, Texas Timothy K. Perttula Center for Regional Heritage Research, Stephen F. Austin State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Repository Citation Perttula, Timothy K. (2010) "Archaeological Findings from an Historic Caddo Site (41AN184) in Anderson County, Texas," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2010 , Article 24. https://doi.org/10.21112/.ita.2010.1.24 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2010/iss1/24 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Archaeological Findings from an Historic Caddo Site (41AN184) in Anderson County, Texas Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2010/iss1/24 Archaeological Findings from an Historic Caddo Site (41AN184) in Anderson County, Texas Timothy K. Perttula INTRODUCTION using a 1/4-inch thick pokey rod to help with their search. In two locations at what is now known as This article reports on the archaeological fi nd- 41AN184, Ron Green and his friends encountered ings from a Historic Caddo site (41AN184)1 in the evidence of what turned out to be Caddo burial pits upper Neches River basin in Anderson County, in (an unknown depth below the surface). According East Texas. The site was found in about 1960 by Ron to Green (2007:2): Green (of Rockdale, Texas) when he was a teenager. In 2007, he donated the collection of artifacts to the We tried to be careful with the digging Caddo Nation of Oklahoma, noting that “[n]othing to make sure we did not break anything. can undo what has been done, but I know that the In removing the layers of dirt I noticed a Caddo Nation will ensure these artifacts are given thin layer of black dirt above where we the proper respect and honor they would get no would fi nd the artifacts. It was not clear where else” (Green 2007:2). The artifacts donated what this was about until the last place we by Mr. Green are from a late 17th to early 18th cen- excavated. In that excavation was a part tury Caddo site, and includes European trade goods of a skull and leg bone. It was then that I (glass beads) as well as Caddo manufactured objects realized the black layer must have been a (including ceramic vessels and arrow points), which charcoal like material to prevent animals are rarely found on Caddo sites in the upper Neches from digging into the shallow graves. River basin.2 We carefully fi lled in the excavation and never dug again. The black charcoal-like layer encountered in their BACKGROUND ON THE SITE AND digging likely marked the accumulation of charred THE DISCOVERY OF ARTIFACTS organic materials and foods that had been burned Site 41AN184 is situated on an alluvial fan (320 and deliberately placed in the graves of the Caddo feet amsl) on the side south of Walnut Creek, just deceased, possibly part of the “Sixth Day Feast” west of the confl uence of Walnut Creek and Cooper burial rituals of the Caddo peoples (Gonzalez Creek. Walnut Creek is an eastward-fl owing tribu- 2005:57). The charcoal-like layer may also represent tary of the Neches River, about 15 km south of the evidence of fi res lit at the foot of the grave. Lake Palestine dam, and 50 km north of the various crossings of the Neches River by the El Camino Real de los Tejas (Corbin 1991). In 1960, the site was in RECOVERED ARTIFACTS an abandoned fi eld that had not been cultivated for several years; Ron Green’s father had leased the land A varied assortment of artifacts are in the do- from ca. 1930 to 1960 for cultivation and had told nated Ron Green collection from 41AN184. This his son that he had found pieces of pottery there. includes four Caddo ceramic vessels, four arrow When the site was recorded in 2007, the land had points, one large biface, and fi ve European glass recently been cleared of hardwoods and pine trees beads. Information is not available, unfortunately, that had grown up in the old fi eld. on either the provenience of any of the artifacts by In 1960, Ron Green and friends were looking burial feature, or which of the artifacts had been for artifacts in the old fi elds along Walnut Creek placed together in those features. Journal of Northeast Texas Archaeology, Volume 33, 2010 54 Journal of Northeast Texas Archaeology 33 (2010) this variety of Patton Engraved, the ticked circle Ceramic Vessels element, encircled by ticked semi-circles, is on the There are four ceramic vessels from 41AN184 body of the vessel, while the rim has two widely- in the Ron Green donated collection. They include spaced horizontal engraved lines with triangular tick a very large Patton Engraved bowl (Figure 1, back marks on them; the vessel from 41AN184 lacks the row), a medium-sized Poynor Engraved globular horizontal engraved and ticked rim panel. carinated bowl (Figure 1, front row, second from In one instance on the 41AN184 vessel, the cen- left), an inverted rim engraved carinated bowl tral ticked circle element has been bisected (because (Figure 1, front row, far left), and a medium-sized of a design or execution error?) by a single arcing engraved bottle (Figure 1, front row, far right). curvilinear and ticked engraved line (Figure 2b). Patton Engraved is considered to be the principal The placement of this additional curvilinear ticked engraved fi ne ware vessel in ca. post-A.D. 1650 engraved line at least indicates that the central ticked Historic Caddo sites in the Neches-Angelina river circle elements were engraved fi rst on the vessel, basins in East Texas. followed by the adjacent curvilinear ticked lines. The Patton Engraved, var. unspecifi ed bowl The dark brown globular carinated bowl (see from 41AN184 has an engraved design on the upper Figure 1, front row, second from left), a common vessel body, enclosed by upper and lower horizontal Poynor Engraved vessel form (Suhm and Jelks engraved lines, as well as horizontal brushing marks 1962:Plate 62b, j), has a distinctive engraved motif on the lower body (Figure 2a). The engraved design on the rim. The motif includes a central negative consists of a series of arcing curvilinear and ticked oval outlined by two sets of hatched brackets (remi- engraved lines that extend from the top to the bottom niscent of Poynor Engraved, var. Hood, see Perttula of the engraved panel, and are on opposite sides of 2008:Figure 1e), and these elements are enclosed two increasingly smaller central ticked circles. The within a rectangular panel defi ned at either end by central ticked circle element is also seen on Patton two closely-spaced vertical engraved lines and a Engraved, var. Fair vessels in the upper Neches large hatched pendant triangle whose apexes point (Perttula 2008:Figure 2g). However, in the case of towards the central negative oval. This vessel from Figure 1. Ceramic vessels donated by Ron Green to the Caddo Nation of Oklahoma from 41AN184. Archaeological Findings from an Historic Caddo Site (41AN184) in Anderson County, Texas 55 a b Figure 2. Patton Engraved, var. unspecifi ed globular bowl from 41AN184: a, side view; b, close-up of the engraved lines and triangular tick marks. 56 Journal of Northeast Texas Archaeology 33 (2010) 41AN184 is considered to be a Poynor Engraved, the slight collar; the apex of the triangles touch the var. unspecifi ed vessel. wavy horizontal engraved line. The vessel body has The inverted rim carinated bowl has a series several sets of poorly executed curvilinear engraved of engraved hook arm elements within an oval- scrolls (i.e., each scroll is comprised of three or four shaped area on a rim panel defi ned by upper and closely-spaced engraved lines rather than one broad lower horizontal engraved lines (see Figure 1, and carefully executed scroll) that begin either along front row, far left), and divided from each other the upper or lower vessel body and intersect around by hatched vertical brackets on either side of a central oval formed by the meeting of the upper the hooked arms. This particular motif clearly and lower scrolls. resembles two unnamed varieties (var. N and var. P) of Poynor Engraved recently recognized in the Ceramic Pipe upper Neches River basin (see Perttula 2009:Figure 6-64), as well as Poynor Engraved, var. Lang (Pert- Green (2007:2) notes that a ceramic pipe was tula 2008:Figure 1g’). These unnamed varieties of also found in the partial excavations of the burial Poynor Engraved make their appearance after ca.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A History of Tennessee
    SECTION VI State of Tennessee A History of Tennessee The Land and Native People Tennessee’s great diversity in land, climate, rivers, and plant and animal life is mirrored by a rich and colorful past. Until the last 200 years of the approximately 12,000 years that this country has been inhabited, the story of Tennessee is the story of its native peoples. The fact that Tennessee and many of the places in it still carry Indian names serves as a lasting reminder of the significance of its native inhabitants. Since much of Tennessee’s appeal for settlers lay with the richness and beauty of the land, it seems fitting to begin by considering some of the state’s generous natural gifts. Tennessee divides naturally into three “grand divisions”—upland, often mountainous, East Tennessee; Middle Tennessee, with its foothills and basin; and the low plain of West Tennessee. Travelers coming to the state from the east encounter first the lofty Unaka and Smoky Mountains, flanked on their western slope by the Great Valley of East Tennessee. Moving across the Valley floor, they next face the Cumberland Plateau, which historically attracted little settlement and presented a barrier to westward migration. West of the Plateau, one descends into the Central Basin of Middle Tennessee—a rolling, fertile countryside that drew hunters and settlers alike. The Central Basin is surrounded on all sides by the Highland Rim, the western ridge of which drops into the Tennessee River Valley. Across the river begin the low hills and alluvial plain of West Tennessee. These geographical “grand divisions” correspond to the distinctive political and economic cultures of the state’s three regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Caddo Stories—7Th Grade
    Caddo Traditional Stories Personal Thoughts: My experience this past summer at the workshop and camping down the road at Mission Tejas State Park reinvigorated a personal connection to history. Most authors of history have been men. So, the word history, is simply restated as his story. The collection of oral stories was a tremendous task for early scholars. Winners of conflicts were often the ones to write down the tales of soldiers and politicians alike. Tales of everyday life were equally complex as the tales of battle. With Caddo stories, the main characters were often based on animals. So, a Caddo story can be a historical narrative featuring the environment, culture, and time period. The sounds of nighttime crawlers of the 21st century are the same sounds heard by the Caddo of Caddo Mounds State Historic Site. The nighttime sky above the forests of pine, pecan, and oak is the same as back then. The past is all around us, we just have to take it in. About This Lesson General Citation This lesson is based on the National Register of Historic Places registration files for Caddo Mounds State Historic Site (also known as the George C. Davis site) and materials prepared by the Texas Historical Commission. It was written by Kathy Lathen, a Texas educator with over a decade of classroom instructional experience. This lesson is one in a series that brings the important stories of historic places into classrooms across the country. Where is fits into Curriculum Topics and Time Period: This lesson could be incorporated with the Texas history unit on the historical era, Natural Texas and Its People (Prehistory to 1528).
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Athens, Georgia
    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 ATHENS, GEORGIA BULLETIN 59 2016 BULLETIN 59 2016 PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 THE CLASSIC CENTER ATHENS, GEORGIA Meeting Organizer: Edited by: Hosted by: Cover: © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CLASSIC CENTER FLOOR PLAN……………………………………………………...……………………..…... PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………….…..……. LIST OF DONORS……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..……. SPECIAL THANKS………………………………………………………………………………………….….....……….. SEAC AT A GLANCE……………………………………………………………………………………….……….....…. GENERAL INFORMATION & SPECIAL EVENTS SCHEDULE…………………….……………………..…………... PROGRAM WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26…………………………………………………………………………..……. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27……………………………………………………………………………...…...13 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 28TH……………………………………………………………….……………....…..21 SATURDAY, OCTOBER 29TH…………………………………………………………….…………....…...28 STUDENT PAPER COMPETITION ENTRIES…………………………………………………………………..………. ABSTRACTS OF SYMPOSIA AND PANELS……………………………………………………………..…………….. ABSTRACTS OF WORKSHOPS…………………………………………………………………………...…………….. ABSTRACTS OF SEAC STUDENT AFFAIRS LUNCHEON……………………………………………..…..……….. SEAC LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS FOR 2016…………………….……………….…….…………………. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 59, 2016 ConferenceRooms CLASSIC CENTERFLOOR PLAN 6 73rd Annual Meeting, Athens, Georgia EVENT LOCATIONS Baldwin Hall Baldwin Hall 7 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin
    [Show full text]
  • The Caddo After Europeans
    Volume 2016 Article 91 2016 Reaping the Whirlwind: The Caddo after Europeans Timothy K. Perttula Heritage Research Center, Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] Robert Cast Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Perttula, Timothy K. and Cast, Robert (2016) "Reaping the Whirlwind: The Caddo after Europeans," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2016, Article 91. https://doi.org/10.21112/.ita.2016.1.91 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2016/iss1/91 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reaping the Whirlwind: The Caddo after Europeans Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2016/iss1/91
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management Program 2013-2018 Appendix A
    Appendix A 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) As required under Sections 303(d) and 304(a) of the federal Clean Water Act, this list identifies the water bodies in or bordering Texas for which effluent limitations are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards, and for which the associated pollutants are suitable for measurement by maximum daily load. In addition, the TCEQ also develops a schedule identifying Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) that will be initiated in the next two years for priority impaired waters. Issuance of permits to discharge into 303(d)-listed water bodies is described in the TCEQ regulatory guidance document Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (January 2003, RG-194). Impairments are limited to the geographic area described by the Assessment Unit and identified with a six or seven-digit AU_ID. A TMDL for each impaired parameter will be developed to allocate pollutant loads from contributing sources that affect the parameter of concern in each Assessment Unit. The TMDL will be identified and counted using a six or seven-digit AU_ID. Water Quality permits that are issued before a TMDL is approved will not increase pollutant loading that would contribute to the impairment identified for the Assessment Unit. Explanation of Column Headings SegID and Name: The unique identifier (SegID), segment name, and location of the water body. The SegID may be one of two types of numbers. The first type is a classified segment number (4 digits, e.g., 0218), as defined in Appendix A of the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (TSWQS).
    [Show full text]
  • Caddo Archives and Economies
    Volume 2005 Article 14 2005 Caddo Archives and Economies Paul S. Marceaux University of Texas at Austin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Marceaux, Paul S. (2005) "Caddo Archives and Economies," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2005, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.21112/.ita.2005.1.14 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2005/iss1/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Caddo Archives and Economies Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2005/iss1/14 Caddo Archives and Economies Paul Shawn Marceaux The University of Texas at Austin Introduction This article is a discussion of archival research on contact through historic period (ca. A.D. 1519 to 18th century) Caddo groups in eastern Texas and west central Louisiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Hasinai-European Interaction, 1694-1715
    East Texas Historical Journal Volume 34 Issue 2 Article 6 10-1996 Hasinai-European Interaction, 1694-1715 Daniel A. Hickerson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj Part of the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Recommended Citation Hickerson, Daniel A. (1996) "Hasinai-European Interaction, 1694-1715," East Texas Historical Journal: Vol. 34 : Iss. 2 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj/vol34/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in East Texas Historical Journal by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EAST TEXAS HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION 3 HASINAI-EUROPEAN INTERACTION, 1694-17151 by Daniel A. Hickerson Spanish withdrawal and retrenchment, 1694-1709 The first Spanish missionary effort in East Texa~ began in 1690 with the arrival of a small party that left among the Hasinai Indians three Franciscan priests, accompanied by three soldiers. L The missioniz.ation of the Hasinai was undertaken as a reaction to the occupation of the Texas Gulf coast by the French explorer Rene Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle during the 16ROs. Despite an optimistic beginning, the Spaniards were forced to abandon their mission only three years later when the hostility of the Hasinai compelled them to flee. The Hasinai, who initially welcomed the Europeans, had suffered a series of severe epidemics for which they correctly blamed the Spaniards. They were further angered by the priests' persistent attempts to convert them to Catholicism, as well as the failure of the Spanish soldiers to aid them in battles against the Apaches and other enemies.-' After the retreat from the East Texas mission in 1693, the Spanish had little direct documented contact with the Hasinai for more than two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Description of the Region
    Chapter 1 Description of the Region The East Texas Regional Water Planning Area (ETRWPA) is one of sixteen areas established by the 1997 Texas legislature Senate Bill 1 for the purpose of State water resource planning at a regional level on five- year planning cycles. The first regional water plan was adopted in 2001. Since that time, it was updated in 2006, 2011, and 2016. This plan, the 2021 Regional Water Plan (2021 Plan), is the result of the 5th cycle of regional water planning. Pursuant to the formation of the ETRWPA, the East Texas Regional Water Planning Group (ETRWPG or RWPG), was formed and charged with the responsibility to evaluate the region’s population projections, water demand projections, and existing water supplies for a 50-year planning horizon. The RWPG then identifies water shortages under drought of record conditions and recommends water management strategies. This planning is performed in accordance with regional and state water planning requirements of the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB). This chapter provides details for the ETRWPA that are relevant to water resource planning, including: a physical description of the region, climatological details, population projections, economic activities, sources of water and water demand, and regional resources. A discussion of threats to the region’s resources and water supply, a general discussion of water conservation and drought preparation in the region, and a listing of ongoing state and federal programs in the ETRWPA that impact water planning efforts in the region are also provided. 1.1 General Introduction The ETRWPA consists of all or portions of 20 counties located in the Neches, Sabine, and Trinity River Basins, and the Neches- Trinity Coastal Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • TPWD Strategic Planning Regions
    River Basins TPWD Brazos River Basin Brazos-Colorado Coastal Basin W o lf Cr eek Canadian River Basin R ita B l anca C r e e k e e ancar Cl ita B R Strategic Planning Colorado River Basin Colorado-Lavaca Coastal Basin Canadian River Cypress Creek Basin Regions Guadalupe River Basin Nor t h F o r k of the R e d R i ver XAmarillo Lavaca River Basin 10 Salt Fork of the Red River Lavaca-Guadalupe Coastal Basin Neches River Basin P r air i e Dog To w n F o r k of the R e d R i ver Neches-Trinity Coastal Basin ® Nueces River Basin Nor t h P e as e R i ve r Nueces-Rio Grande Coastal Basin Pease River Red River Basin White River Tongue River 6a Wi chita R iver W i chita R i ver Rio Grande River Basin Nor t h Wi chita R iver Little Wichita River South Wichita Ri ver Lubbock Trinity River Sabine River Basin X Nor t h Sulphur R i v e r Brazos River West Fork of the Trinity River San Antonio River Basin Brazos River Sulphur R i v e r South Sulphur River San Antonio-Nueces Coastal Basin 9 Clear Fork Tr Plano San Jacinto River Basin X Cypre ss Creek Garland FortWorth Irving X Sabine River in San Jacinto-Brazos Coastal Basin ity Rive X Clea r F o r k of the B r az os R i v e r XTr n X iityX RiverMesqu ite Sulphur River Basin r XX Dallas Arlington Grand Prai rie Sabine River Trinity River Basin XAbilene Paluxy River Leon River Trinity-San Jacinto Coastal Basin Chambers Creek Brazos River Attoyac Bayou XEl Paso R i c h land Cr ee k Colorado River 8 Pecan Bayou 5a Navasota River Neches River Waco Angelina River Concho River X Colorado River 7 Lampasas
    [Show full text]
  • Hasinai-European Interaction, 1694-1715 Daniel A
    East Texas Historical Journal Volume 34 | Issue 2 Article 6 10-1996 Hasinai-European Interaction, 1694-1715 Daniel A. Hickerson Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj Part of the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Recommended Citation Hickerson, Daniel A. (1996) "Hasinai-European Interaction, 1694-1715," East Texas Historical Journal: Vol. 34: Iss. 2, Article 6. Available at: http://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj/vol34/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in East Texas Historical Journal by an authorized administrator of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EAST TEXAS HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION 3 HASINAI-EUROPEAN INTERACTION, 1694-17151 by Daniel A. Hickerson Spanish withdrawal and retrenchment, 1694-1709 The first Spanish missionary effort in East Texa~ began in 1690 with the arrival of a small party that left among the Hasinai Indians three Franciscan priests, accompanied by three soldiers. L The missioniz.ation of the Hasinai was undertaken as a reaction to the occupation of the Texas Gulf coast by the French explorer Rene Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle during the 16ROs. Despite an optimistic beginning, the Spaniards were forced to abandon their mission only three years later when the hostility of the Hasinai compelled them to flee. The Hasinai, who initially welcomed the Europeans, had suffered a series of severe epidemics for which they correctly blamed the Spaniards. They were further angered by the priests' persistent attempts to convert them to Catholicism, as well as the failure of the Spanish soldiers to aid them in battles against the Apaches and other enemies.-' After the retreat from the East Texas mission in 1693, the Spanish had little direct documented contact with the Hasinai for more than two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Neches River Basin And
    TEXAS WATER COMMISSION Joe D. Carter, Chairman 0. F. Dent, Commissioner H. A. Beckwith, Commissioner CIRCULAR NO. 62-03 DRAINAGE AREAS OF TEXAS STREAMS NECHES RIVER BASIN AND NECHES-TRINITY COASTAL AREA Prepared in cooperation with the U. S. Geological Survey October 1962 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 ADMINISTRATION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1 TOPOGRAPHY. ........ 1 CONCEPTS OF DRAINAGE AREAS .. 2 METHOD OF DRAINAGE-AREA DETERMINATION 2 TABULATION OF DATA. 5 FUNCTION OF COORDINATING OFFICE 5 NECHES RIVER BASIN .. 7 TABLES OF DRAINAGE-AREA DATA 2 . Neches River Basin. , 8 2a. Neches-Trinity Coastal Area. 13 ILLUSTRATIONS Figures 1. Contour map of Texas showing principal physiographic provinces........ 3 2, River basins and coastal areas of Texas 4 DRAINAGE AREAS OF TEXAS STREAMS INTRODUCTION An accurate figure for drainage area is one of the most significant factors used in hydrologic investigations of a river basin and in the hydraulic computa tions for the design of structures on a stream. This report is being compiled so that drainage-area information of uniform accuracy and reliability will be avail able to all users of these data for any foreseeable hydraulic, hydrologic, or gen eral engineering use. In 1951 the Subcommittee on Hydrology, Federal Inter-Agency River Basin Com mittee, delegated the U. S. Corps of Engineers as the official coordinating agency for drainage areas in the Arkansas and Red River basins, and the U. S. Geological Survey as the official coordinating agency for all other river basins in Texas. In November 1954 the data for the Red and Arkansas Rivers were published by the Corps of Engineers in a pamphlet entitled "Drainage Area Data, Arkansas, White, and Red River Basins".
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Groups in Texas
    077 11/18/02 8:50 AM Page 81 Why It Matters Now Native American Groups Learning about the ways 2 Native Texans adapted to their environment may help us preserve in Texas and adapt to our own environment. TERMS & NAMES OBJECTIVES MAIN IDEA Coahuiltecans, Karankawas, 1. Compare the cultures of Native Native Texans began to develop nomad, Caddoes, Atakapans, Americans in Texas prior to European their own distinct cultures. They Alabama-Coushattas, colonization. developed different languages, Apaches, Lipan Apaches, 2. Identify ways in which Texans have skills, customs, beliefs, and Comanches, Kiowas, adapted to and modified the attitudes toward outsiders. Each Tonkawas, Wichitas, environment. group’s lifestyle and practices were Jumanos, Tiguas, adobe, 3. Compare types and uses of technology uniquely suited to its environment Cherokees, Kickapoos past and present. and specific needs. Imagine that you are a Native Texan during the 1600s. You have WHAT Would You Do? always traveled around on foot, using spears, bows and arrows, and Write your response your bare hands to survive. Lately, however, you have heard about to Interact with History in your Texas Notebook. strangers who ride swiftly across the plains on beasts they call horses. They also carry powerful weapons that seem to shoot fire. How do you think you would feel about these unusual sights? How might they change your life? Native Texans of the Gulf Coast Native Texans (Native Americans who lived in Texas) developed lifestyles that made the most of the plants and wildlife in their areas. The Coahuiltecans (ko•ah•WEEL•tay•cunz) and the Karankawas (ka•RAN•keh•wahs) were the two major groups of Native Texans who lived in this region.
    [Show full text]