First Report of Amblyseius Tamatavensis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in the United States of America

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

First Report of Amblyseius Tamatavensis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in the United States of America International Journal of Acarology ISSN: 0164-7954 (Print) 1945-3892 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/taca20 First report of Amblyseius tamatavensis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in the United States of America İsmail Döker, Yisell Velazquez Hernandez, Catharine Mannion & Daniel Carrillo To cite this article: İsmail Döker, Yisell Velazquez Hernandez, Catharine Mannion & Daniel Carrillo (2018): First report of Amblyseius tamatavensis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in the United States of America, International Journal of Acarology, DOI: 10.1080/01647954.2018.1461132 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01647954.2018.1461132 Published online: 23 Apr 2018. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=taca20 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACAROLOGY, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1080/01647954.2018.1461132 SHORT COMMUNICATION First report of Amblyseius tamatavensis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in the United States of America İsmail Dökera,b, Yisell Velazquez Hernandeza, Catharine Manniona and Daniel Carrilloa aTropical Research & Education Center, Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Homestead, FL, USA; bAgricultural Faculty, Department Plant Protection, Acarology Lab, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Amblyseius tamatavensis Blommers (Acari: phytoseiidae) is reported for the first time in the United Received 22 February 2018 States of America, based on specimens collected from Laportea aestuans (Urticaceae) and Solanum Accepted 1 April 2018 americanum (Solanaceae) where it was found in association with the banded-wing whitefly Trialeurodes Published online 23 April abutiloneus (Haldeman) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in southern Florida. Further observations confirmed 2018 that this predator can feed and reproduce on sweet potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius), and KEYWORDS ficus whitefly, Singhiella simplex (Singh). This species may be an important predator as a potential Biological control; whitefly; biological control agent of whiteflies. Amblyseius tamatavensis from Florida was re-described and predatory mite; new record; illustrated based on female specimens to access intraspecific variation as well as to secure further North America diagnosis. Introduction Solanum americanum (Solanaceae), associated with banded- wing whitefly Trialeurodes abutiloneus (Haldeman) (Hemiptera: Predatory mites in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) Aleyrodidae) in Florida. are important natural enemies of not only plant feeding mites but also small, soft-bodied insects such as thrips and whiteflies (Chant and McMurtry 2007; McMutry et al. 2013). Some phytoseiid spe- Material and methods cies are widely used in biological control and integrated pest Plants infested with T. abutiloneus were collected in an experi- management programmes around the world. Amblydromalus mental shade-house at the University of Florida, Tropical Research limonicus (Garman and McGregor), Amblyseius swirskii Athias- and Education Center (UF-TREC, 18905 SW 280, Homestead, FL, Henriot, and Neoseiulus cucumeris (Oudemans) are the most com- 33031). Samples were examined under a binocular microscope monly used phytoseiids for augmentative biological control of and phytoseiid mites were directly mounted in Hoyer’s medium various whiteflies and thrips species in greenhouses (McMutry on microscope slides. The slides were warmed for 24 h on a et al. 2013). However, natural populations of predatory mites hotplate set at 50°C. Drawings were prepared based on the could be of primary importance for biological control, because photos that were taken using a Zeiss Axiocam 503 colour digital of their adaptation to natural habitats. camera attached to a Zeiss AX 10® Imager M2 microscope. The The diversity of Phytoseiidae in the United States has been taxonomic system used follows® Chant and McMurtry (2007). The well documented with more than 320 species (including syno- setal nomenclature used follows Lindquist and Evans (1965)as nyms) belonging to 36 genera (Denmark and Evans 2011). adapted by Rowell et al. (1978). The dorsal and ventral setal Among them, only 13 species of the genus Amblyseius are pattern is that of Chant and Yoshida-Shaul (1989, 1991, 1992). known in Florida (Denmark and Muma 1989;Denmarkand All measurements are in micrometres (µm) and presented as the Evans 2011). Amblyseius species are considered generalist pre- mean followed by the range in parenthesis. Specimens examined dators that feed and reproduce on a wide range of prey, in this study are deposited in the UF-TREC, Fruit Crops including mites of several families, as well as thrips, whiteflies, Entomology lab Homestead, FL, USA. mealybugs, and nematodes (McMutry et al. 2013). Some spe- cies are able to feed and reproduce well on pollen and can utilize plant exudates and honeydew as survival food in the Results absence of prey, or as complementary food when prey is New record for the United States of America present (McMurtry and Croft 1997). Amblyseius tamatavensis was first described from Madagascar Amblyseius tamatavensis Blommers Island based on the material collected from Citrus (Papeda) hystrix (Figures 1–5) (Rutaceae) (Blommers 1974). Natural populations of this species are currently known in more than 30 countries on four continents Amblyseius (Amblyseius) tamatavensis Blommers, 1974: 144. Ehara (Demite et al. 2018). In the Americas, it has been reported from and Amano 2002: 322; Ueckermann and Loots 1988: 76; Brazil (Gondim and de Moraes 2001), Cuba (de Moraes et al. Amblyseius tamatavensis, Moraes et al. 1989: 97; Chant and 1991), Dominican Republic (Abo–Shnaf et al. 2016), Guadeloupe, McMurtry, 2004: 203; 2007: 81; Denmark and Muma 1989: 13; Martinique (de Moraes et al. 2000–1999), and Venezuela (de Ehara and Amano 2004: 17; Ehara 2002: 33; Kreiter et al. 2002: Quirós et al. 2005). Here we report the occurrence of natural 348; Moraes et al. 1991: 119; 2000–1999: 241; 2004a: 52; 2004b: populations of A. tamatavensis for the first time in Florida and 144; 2013: 308; Oliveira et al. 2012: 5; Schicha and Corpuz-Raros the USA, collected from Laportea aestuans (Urticaceae) and CONTACT İ smail Döker [email protected] University of Florida, Tropical Research & Education Center, Department of Entomology and Nematology, Homestead, FL, USA © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online 23 Apr 2018 2 İ. DÖKER ET AL. Figure 1–5. Amblyseius tamatavensis Blommers, female: 1. Dorsal shield; 2. Ventral idiosoma; 3. Chelicera; 4. Spermatheca; 5. Leg IV. 1992: 36; Schicha 1981; 40; 1987; 54; Silva et al. 2016: 1137; (distance between bases of setae S2) 209 (208–210). Dorsal setae Zannou et al. 2007: 29. smooth except for Z4 and Z5 which have very little barbs. Measurements of dorsal setae as follows: j1 32 (30–34), j3 53 Synonyms: Amblyseius aegyptiacus Denmark and Matthysse, in (52–54), j4 5(4–6), j5 5(4–6), j6 5(4–6), J2 5(4–6), J5 7(6–8), z2 Matthysse and Denmark (1981): 343 (synonymy according to 5(4–6), z4 5(4–6), z5 5(4–6), Z1 5(4–6), Z4 117 (114–120), Z5 237 Denmark and Muma 1989); Amblyseius maai Tseng 1976: 123 (232–242), s4 87 (86–88), S2 5(4–6), S4 5(44–6), S5 5( –6), r3 14 (synonymy according to Denmark and Muma 1989). (12–16), and R1 5(4–6). Female (n = 4) Dorsum (Figure 1). Dorsal setal pattern 10A:9B (r3 and R1 off Peritreme. Long, extending beyond setae j1 (slightly hooked shield). Dorsal shield oval with a waist at level Z1, smooth; bear- apically between bases of setae j1). ing seven pairs of solenostomes (gd1, gd2, gd4, gd5. gd6, gd8, and gd9); nine pairs of poroids are visible, muscle-marks (sigilla) are Venter (Figure 2). Ventral setal pattern 14:JV–3:ZV. Sternal shield visible on podosoma, length of dorsal shield (j1–J5) 295 (292– smooth except a few striations anteriorly between setae ST1, 298), width (distance between bases of setae s4) 183 (180–184), sclerotized with three pairs of setae (ST1, ST2, ST3), two pairs of INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACAROLOGY 3 poroids (pst1 and pst2). Distance (ST1–ST3) 63 (60–64), width food (Thyreophagus cracentiseta, Acari: Acaridae) suitable for (ST2–ST2) 67 (66–68). Metasternal setae ST4 and a pair of pores mass production of this predator. We observed feeding and (pst3) on metasternal shields. Genital shield smooth; width at reproduction of A. tamatevensis on B. tabaci,andficuswhitefly, level of genital setae (ST5) 68 (66–72). Ventrianal shield smooth Singhiella simplex (Singh) under lab conditions. These two inva- sub-pentagonal, a slight waist is visible at level of setae ZV2; sive whiteflies are major pests of ornamental, vegetable, and bearing three pairs of pre-anal setae (JV1, JV2, and ZV2), a pair fruit crops in Florida (Legaspi et al. 2011). Therefore, further of para-anal (Pa) and a post-anal setae (Pst), and with a pair of efforts to evaluate biological traits of A. tamatavensis and its crescentic pre-anal solenostomes (gv3) posteromedian to JV2; potential to be used in biological control are warranted in distance gv3–gv3 19 (18–20). Length of ventrianal shield 105 Florida. Another interesting fact is that the host plant (L. aes- (104–108), width at level of setae ZV2 91 (88–94). Setae JV4, JV5, tuans) where we found this predator has a high density of ZV1, ZV3, and six pairs of poroids on integument surrounding glandular and stinging trichomes (de Oliveira et al. 2012). ventrianal shield. Setae JV5 smooth, much longer than other Many phytoseiid species unsuccessfully keep pest populations ventral setae, 79 (78–80) in length. under economic thresholds due to the presence of glandular trichomes on their host plants (Escudero and Ferragut 2005; Chelicera (Figure 3). Fixed digit 32 (30–33) long with 11 teeth, Kazak et al. 2015). Whether A. tamatavensis can be used to and a pilus dentilis; movable digit 32 (31–33) long with four teeth. control pests on host plants with glandular trichomes should also be investigated. Spermatheca (Figure 4).
Recommended publications
  • A New Species of Neoseiulus Hughes, with Records of Seven Species of Predatory Mites Associated with Date Palm in Saudi Arabia (Acari: Phytoseiidae)
    Zootaxa 3356: 57–64 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A new species of Neoseiulus Hughes, with records of seven species of predatory mites associated with date palm in Saudi Arabia (Acari: Phytoseiidae) MOHAMED W. NEGM1, FAHAD J. ALATAWI & YOUSIF N. ALDRYHIM Department of Plant Protection, College of Food & Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, P.O. Box 2460, Saudi Arabia 1Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Eight species of phytoseiid mites are reported from date palm orchards in Saudi Arabia. Seven of them were first records for this country: Neoseiulus bicaudus (Wainstein), N. conterminus (Kolodochka), N. makuwa (Ehara), N. rambami (Swirski & Amitai), Proprioseiopsis asetus (Chant), P. messor (Wainstein), P. ovatus (Garman). Neoseiulus makuwa and P. asetus are recorded from the Middle East and North Africa for the first time. One new species is described from Bermuda grass, Neoseiu- lus saudiensis n. sp. The new species is most similar to Neoseiulus alpinus (Schweizer) and N. marginatus (Wainstein). A key for identification of the included species is provided. Key words: Acari, Mesostigmata, Phytoseiidae, biological control, predatory mites, Neoseiulus saudiensis, Saudi Arabia. Introduction The predatory mite family Phytoseiidae contains most of the species presently used as biological control agents of mite pests (Kostiainen & Hoy, 1996; McMurtry & Croft, 1997). The fauna of Phytoseiidae in Saudi Arabia is very poorly known, with only ten species previously recorded (Dabbour & Abdel-Aziz, 1982; Al-Shammery, 2010; Al- Atawi, 2011a,b; Fouly & Al-Rehiayani, 2011). Projects are underway to identify the fauna of phytoseiid mites in Saudi Arabia and select the species that may have potential as biological control agents.
    [Show full text]
  • The Predatory Mite (Acari, Parasitiformes: Mesostigmata (Gamasina); Acariformes: Prostigmata) Community in Strawberry Agrocenosis
    Acta Universitatis Latviensis, Biology, 2004, Vol. 676, pp. 87–95 The predatory mite (Acari, Parasitiformes: Mesostigmata (Gamasina); Acariformes: Prostigmata) community in strawberry agrocenosis Valentîna Petrova*, Ineta Salmane, Zigrîda Çudare Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, Miera 3, Salaspils LV-2169, Latvia *Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected]. Abstract Altogether 37 predatory mite species from 14 families (Parasitiformes and Acariformes) were collected using leaf sampling and pit-fall trapping in strawberry fi elds (1997 - 2001). Thirty- six were recorded on strawberries for the fi rst time in Latvia. Two species, Paragarmania mali (Oud.) (Aceosejidae) and Eugamasus crassitarsis (Hal.) (Parasitidae) were new for the fauna of Latvia. The most abundant predatory mite families (species) collected from strawberry leaves were Phytoseiidae (Amblyseius cucumeris Oud., A. aurescens A.-H., A. bicaudus Wainst., A. herbarius Wainst.) and Anystidae (Anystis baccarum L.); from pit-fall traps – Parasitidae (Poecilochirus necrophori Vitz. and Parasitus lunaris Berl.), Aceosejidae (Leioseius semiscissus Berl.) and Macrochelidae (Macrocheles glaber Müll). Key words: agrocenosis, diversity, predatory mites, strawberry. Introduction Predatory mites play an important ecological role in terrestrial ecosystems and they are increasingly being used in management for biocontrol of pest mites, thrips and nematodes (Easterbrook 1992; Wright, Chambers 1994; Croft et al. 1998; Cuthbertson et al. 2003). Many of these mites have a major infl uence on nutrient cycling, as they are predators on other arthropods (Santos 1985; Karg 1993; Koehler 1999). In total, investigations of mite fauna in Latvia were made by Grube (1859), who found 28 species, Eglītis (1954) – 50 species, Kuznetsov and Petrov (1984) – 85 species, Lapiņa (1988) – 207 species, and Salmane (2001) – 247 species.
    [Show full text]
  • PHYTOSEIIDAE Berlese Phytoseiini Berlese, 1916A: 33
    PHYTOSEIIDAE Berlese Phytoseiini Berlese, 1916a: 33. Gamasidae Banks et al., 2004: 56 (in part) AMBLYSEIINAE Muma Amblyseiinae Muma, 1961a: 273. Amblyseiini Schuster & Pritchard, 1963: 225. Macroseiinae Chant, Denmark & Baker, 1959: 808; Muma, 1961a: 272; Muma et al., 1970: 21. Phytoseiinae Chant, 1965a: 359 (in part). Ingaseius Barbosa, Rocha & Ferla Barbosa et al., 2014: 91. Serraseius Moraes, Barbosa & Castro Moraes et al., 2013: 314. AFROSEIULINI Chant & McMurty Chant & McMurtry, 2006a: 20; 2006b: 13. Afroseiulus Chant & McMurtry Chant & McMurtry, 2006a: 20 AMBLYSEIINI Muma Amblyseiinae Muma, 1961a: 273. Amblyseiini Muma, Wainstein, 1962b: 26; Chant & McMurtry, 2004a: 178; 2006b: 17; 2007: 68. Macroseiinae Chant et al. 1959, 1959: 808. AMBLYSEIINA Muma Chant & McMurtry, 2004a: 179; 2007: 69. Amblyseiella Muma Amblyseiella Muma, 1955a: 266; Muma, 1961a: 286; Muma et al., 1970: 54; Karg, 1983: 301; Chant & McMurtry, 2004a: 187. Amblyseius (Amblyseiella), Pritchard & Baker, 1962: 291. Amblyseius (Amblyseiellus), Wainstein, 1962b: 14. Amblyseius Berlese Amblyseius Berlese, 1914: 143; Garman, 1948: 16; Muma, 1955a: 263; Chant, 1957b: 528; Kennet, 1958: 474; Muma, 1961a: 287; Gonzalez & Schuster, 1962: 8; Pritchard & Baker, 1962: 235; van der Merwe & Ryke, 1963: 89; Chant 1965a; Corpuz & Rimando, 1966: 116; van der Merwe, 1968: 109; Zack, 1969: 71; Muma et al., 1970: 62; Chant & Hansell, 1971: 703; Denmark & Muma, 1972: 19; Tseng, 1976: 104; Chaudhri et al., 1979: 68; Karg, 1982: 193, Schicha, 1987: 19, Schicha & Corpuz-Raros, 1992: 12; Denmark & Muma, 1989: 4; Chant & McMurtry, 2004a: 188; 2007: 73. Amblyseius (Amblyseius), Karg, 1983: 313. Amblyseius (Amblyseialus), Karg, 1983: 313. Amblyseius (Amblyseius) section Amblyseius, Wainstein, 1962b: 15. Amblyseius (Amblyseius) section Italoseius Wainstein, 1962b: 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytoseiids As Biological Control Agents of Phytophagous Mites
    PHYTOSEIIDS AS BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS OF PHYTOPHAGOUS MITES IN WASHINGTON APPLE ORCHARDS By REBECCA ANN SCHMIDT-JEFFRIS A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Entomology MAY 2015 © Copyright by REBECCA ANN SCHMIDT-JEFFRIS, 2015 All Rights Reserved © Copyright by REBECCA ANN SCHMIDT-JEFFRIS, 2015 All Rights Reserved To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the dissertation of REBECCA ANN SCHMIDT-JEFFRIS find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. Elizabeth H. Beers, Ph.D., Chair David W. Crowder, Ph.D. Richard S. Zack, Ph.D. Thomas R. Unruh, Ph.D. Nilsa A. Bosque-Pérez, Ph.D. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to thank Dr. Elizabeth Beers for giving me the opportunity to work in her lab and for several years of exceptional mentoring. She has provided me with an excellent experience and is an outstanding role model. I would also like to thank the other members of my committee, Drs. Thomas Unruh, David Crowder, Nilsa Bosque-Pérez, and Richard Zack for comments on these (and other) manuscripts, and invaluable advice throughout my graduate career. Additionally, I thank the entomology faculty of Washington State University and the University of Idaho for coursework that acted as the foundation for this degree, especially Dr. Sanford Eigenbrode and Dr. James “Ding” Johnson. I also thank Dr. James McMurtry, for input on manuscripts and identification confirmation of mite specimens. I would like to acknowledge the assistance I received in conducting these experiments from our laboratory technicians, Bruce Greenfield and Peter Smytheman, my labmate Alix Whitener, and the many undergraduate technicians that helped collect data: Denise Burnett, Allie Carnline, David Gutiérrez, Kylie Martin, Benjamin Peterson, Mattie Warner, Alyssa White, and Shayla White.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Assessment of Amblyseius Andersoni (Chant) As a Potential Biocontrol Agent Against Phytophagous Mites Occurring on Coniferous Plants
    insects Article A Preliminary Assessment of Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) as a Potential Biocontrol Agent against Phytophagous Mites Occurring on Coniferous Plants Ewa Puchalska 1,* , Stanisław Kamil Zagrodzki 1, Marcin Kozak 2, Brian G. Rector 3 and Anna Mauer 1 1 Section of Applied Entomology, Department of Plant Protection, Institute of Horticultural Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] (S.K.Z.); [email protected] (A.M.) 2 Department of Media, Journalism and Social Communication, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszów, Sucharskiego 2, 35-225 Rzeszów, Poland; [email protected] 3 USDA-ARS, Great Basin Rangelands Research Unit, 920 Valley Rd., Reno, NV 89512, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) is a predatory mite frequently used as a biocontrol agent against phytophagous mites in greenhouses, orchards and vineyards. In Europe, it is an indige- nous species, commonly found on various plants, including conifers. The present study examined whether A. andersoni can develop and reproduce while feeding on two key pests of ornamental coniferous plants, i.e., Oligonychus ununguis (Jacobi) and Pentamerismus taxi (Haller). Pinus sylvestris L. pollen was also tested as an alternative food source for the predator. Both prey species and pine pollen were suitable food sources for A. andersoni. Although higher values of population parameters Citation: Puchalska, E.; were observed when the predator fed on mites compared to the pollen alternative, we conclude that Zagrodzki, S.K.; Kozak, M.; pine pollen may provide adequate sustenance for A.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Palm Mite, Raoiella Indica Hirst (Arachnida: Acari: Tenuipalpidae)1 Marjorie A
    EENY-397 Red Palm Mite, Raoiella indica Hirst (Arachnida: Acari: Tenuipalpidae)1 Marjorie A. Hoy, Jorge Peña, and Ru Nguyen2 Introduction Description and Life Cycle The red palm mite, Raoiella indica Hirst, a pest of several Mites in the family Tenuipalpidae are commonly called important ornamental and fruit-producing palm species, “false spider mites” and are all plant feeders. However, has invaded the Western Hemisphere and is in the process only a few species of tenuipalpids in a few genera are of of colonizing islands in the Caribbean, as well as other areas economic importance. The tenuipalpids have stylet-like on the mainland. mouthparts (a stylophore) similar to that of spider mites (Tetranychidae). The mouthparts are long, U-shaped, with Distribution whiplike chelicerae that are used for piercing plant tissues. Tenuipalpids feed by inserting their chelicerae into plant Until recently, the red palm mite was found in India, Egypt, tissue and removing the cell contents. These mites are small Israel, Mauritius, Reunion, Sudan, Iran, Oman, Pakistan, and flat and usually feed on the under surface of leaves. and the United Arab Emirates. However, in 2004, this pest They are slow moving and do not produce silk, as do many was detected in Martinique, Dominica, Guadeloupe, St. tetranychid (spider mite) species. Martin, Saint Lucia, Trinidad, and Tobago in the Caribbean. In November 2006, this pest was found in Puerto Rico. Adults: Females of Raoiella indica average 245 microns (0.01 inches) long and 182 microns (0.007 inches) wide, are In 2007, the red palm mite was discovered in Florida. As of oval and reddish in color.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Predatory Mite, Amblyseius (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from Stored Coffee Berries
    J. bio-sci. 14: 39-41, 2006 ISSN 1023-8654 A NEW SPECIES OF PREDATORY MITE, AMBLYSEIUS (ACARINA: PHYTOSEIIDAE) FROM STORED COFFEE BERRIES Mary Anithalatha Sadanandan P G and Research Department of Zoology, Malabar Christian College, Calicut, Kerala 0495 2760268 Abstract A new species of predatory mite of the family Phytoseiidae viz., Amblyseius (Amblyseius) coffeae sp. nov. is described from stored coffee berries. Key words: Predatory mite, Phytoseiidae, Amblyseius, new species. Introduction Predatory mites constitute a highly significant beneficial group on account of their vital role in the maintenance of pest population below the economic injury level. The species of Phytoseiidae are potentially important as a biotic factor in the control of phytophagous mites (Ewing 1914). Mass multiplication methods have been developed to use these predators in commercial scale on a variety of crops (Lo et al. 1979, Krishnamoorty 1982). Phytoseiidae contain 168 species under 12 genera (Gupta and Arun Gupta 1999). However, the reports on occurrence of new species are scanty from peninsular India. Hence a systematic survey was undertaken to unravel the occurrence of new species of Phytoseiidae from various districts of Kerala. The present new species was collected during this survey. The occurrence of phytoseiids in stored products is a very rare phenomenon, though isolated examples exists for the occurrence of members of Amblyseius and Neoseiulus in stored grains (Hughes 1976, Smiley 1984). Materials and Methods The predatory mite fauna harbouring on various stored commodities were collected by making extensive surveys in Kerala. Random samples of 100gms were collected in separate polythene bags and brought to the laboratory.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Neoseiulus Cucumeris and Amblyseius Swirskii (Acari
    Biological Control 49 (2009) 91–96 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Control journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ybcon Evaluation of Neoseiulus cucumeris and Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) as biological control agents of chilli thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on pepper Steven Arthurs a,*, Cindy L. McKenzie b, Jianjun Chen a, Mahmut Dogramaci a, Mary Brennan a, Katherine Houben a, Lance Osborne a a Mid-Florida Research and Education Center and Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, IFAS, 2725 Binion Road, Apopka, FL 32703-8504, United States b US Horticultural Research Laboratory, ARS-USDA, 2001 South Rock Road, Fort Pierce, FL 34945, United States article info abstract Article history: The invasive chilli thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood poses a significant risk to many food and ornamental Received 20 November 2008 crops in the Caribbean, Florida and Texas. We evaluated two species of phytoseiid mites as predators of S. Accepted 6 January 2009 dorsalis. In leaf disc assays, gravid females of Neoseiulus cucumeris and Amblyseius swirskii both fed on S. Available online 20 January 2009 dorsalis at statistically similar rates. Larvae were the preferred prey for both species, consuming on aver- age 2.7/day, compared with 1.1–1.7 adults/day in no choice tests. Adult thrips were rarely consumed in Keywords: subsequent choice tests when larvae were also present. Mite fecundity was statistically similar for both Chilli thrips species feeding on thrips larvae (1.3 eggs/day) but significantly less for A. swirskii restricted to a diet of Predatory mite adult thrips (0.5 eggs/day).
    [Show full text]
  • Life Styles of Phytoseiid Mites: Implications for Rearing And
    Items for Consideration Life Styles of Phytoseiid Mites: • Evolution of feeding habits of the Phytoseiidae. • Some associations of Phytoseiidae with different foods and Implications for Rearing and Biological plants (life styles). Control Strategies • Relationships of life styles to rearing and biological control (examples). • Some challenges at the species level in relation to biological control. J. A. McMurtry • Summary and Conclusions Professor Emeritus, Univ. of California, Riverside Present address: Sunriver, Oregon, USA Neoseiulus ellesmerei- ancestral morphology Hypothetical pathways of evolution of phytoseiid food habits Neo Soil or bark Foliage (“protophytoseiid”) “Generalists” Ancestral morphol. Specific predators “Generalists” Derived morphol. Derived morphol. ? (multiple events) (multiple events) Pollen Highly specialists specific Amblyseius phillipsi- highly derived morphology (After Chant & McMurtry 2004) Life Styles of Phytoseiid Mites (McMurtry & Croft 1997; Croft et al. 2004) • Highly specific on Tetranychus spp. (Type I ) • Broadly specific, tetranychids most favorable (Type II) • Generalists; wide array of foods acceptable (Type III) • Specialized pollen feeders, general predators (Type IV) Highly specialized predators of Tetranychus spp. (Type I) • Very high reproductive potential • Live in spider mite colonies • Very long median dorsal (j-J) setae • Plant habitat less important than prey species • Require spider mites for mass production Subfamily Amblyseiinae- Phytoseiulus- 4 spp., all highly Phytoseiulus persimilis derived, unrelated to other groups. P. persimilis brought fame to the Phytoseiidae in the 1960’s. Phytoseiulus persimilis Phytoseiulus persimilis (after Chant & McMurtry 2006) Courtesy R. Cloid Glasshouse cucumber production Releasing Phytoseiulus persimilis in strawberry field Bean plants infested with Tetranychus pacificus “Washing machine” for harvesting spider mites Shaking spider mite eggs onto rearing unit Techniques developed by G.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Commercial Augmentative Biological Control: Plenty of Natural Enemies, but a Frustrating Lack of Uptake
    BioControl DOI 10.1007/s10526-011-9395-1 FORUM PAPER The state of commercial augmentative biological control: plenty of natural enemies, but a frustrating lack of uptake Joop C. van Lenteren Received: 20 March 2011 / Accepted: 7 July 2011 Ó The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Augmentative biological control concerns application of augmentative biological control are the periodical release of natural enemies. In com- explored. mercial augmentative biological control, natural enemies are mass-reared in biofactories for release Keywords Exotic natural enemies Á Indigenous in large numbers to obtain an immediate control of natural enemies Á Trends in natural enemy use Á pests. The history of commercial mass production of Pesticide substitution Á Access and benefit sharing natural enemies spans a period of roughly 120 years. in biological control It has been a successful, environmentally and eco- nomically sound alternative for chemical pest control Introduction in crops like fruit orchards, maize, cotton, sugar cane, soybean, vineyards and greenhouses. Currently, aug- Biological control is the use of an organism to reduce mentative biological control is in a critical phase, the population density of another organism. Biolog- even though during the past decades it has moved ical control has been in use for about two millennia, from a cottage industry to professional production. and has become widely used in pest management Many efficient species of natural enemies have been since the end of the nineteenth century (DeBach discovered and 230 are commercially available today. 1964; van Lenteren and Godfray 2005). The follow- The industry developed quality control guidelines, ing types of biological control can be distinguished: mass production, shipment and release methods as natural, conservation, inoculative (=classical) and well as adequate guidance for farmers.
    [Show full text]
  • Control Biológico En Cultivos Hortícolas: Efecto De Los Alimentos Suplementarios En Depredadores Y Parasitoides Marta Fernández Oveja
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa Nom/Logotip de la Universitat on s’ha llegit la tesi Control biológico en cultivos hortícolas: efecto de los alimentos suplementarios en depredadores y parasitoides Marta Fernández Oveja Dipòsit Legal: L.242-2015 http://hdl.handle.net/10803/293152 ADVERTIMENT. L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials d'investigació i docència en els termes establerts a l'art. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix l'autorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes d'explotació efectuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs. ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis doctoral y su utilización debe respetar los derechos de la persona autora. Puede ser utilizada para consulta o estudio personal, así como en actividades o materiales de investigación y docencia en los términos establecidos en el art.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Palm Mite)
    Crop Protection Compendium Datasheet report for Raoiella indica (red palm mite) Top of page Pictures Picture Title Caption Copyright Adult The red palm mite (Raoiella indica), an invasive species in the Caribbean, may threaten USDA- mite several important palms found in the southern USA. (Original magnified approx. 300x.) ARS Photo by Eric Erbe; Digital colourization by Chris Pooley. Colony Colony of red palm mites (Raoiella indica) on coconut leaflet, from India. Bryony of Taylor mites Colony Close-up of a colony of red palm mites (Raoiella indica) on coconut leaflet, from India. Bryony of Taylor mites Top of page Identity Preferred Scientific Name Raoiella indica Hirst (1924) Preferred Common Name red palm mite International Common Names English: coconut red mite; frond crimson mite; leaflet false spider mite; red date palm mite; scarlet mite EPPO code RAOIIN (Raoiella indica) Top of page Taxonomic Tree Domain: Eukaryota Kingdom: Metazoa Phylum: Arthropoda Subphylum: Chelicerata Class: Arachnida Subclass: Acari Superorder: Acariformes Suborder: Prostigmata Family: Tenuipalpidae Genus: Raoiella Species: Raoiella indica / Top of page Notes on Taxonomy and Nomenclature R. indica was first described in the district of Coimbatore (India) by Hirst in 1924 on coconut leaflets [Cocos nucifera]. A comprehensive taxonomic review of the genus and species was carried out by Mesa et al. (2009), which lists all suspected junior synonyms of R. indica, including Raoiella camur (Chaudhri and Akbar), Raoiella empedos (Chaudhri and Akbar), Raoiella obelias (Hasan and Akbar), Raoiella pandanae (Mohanasundaram), Raoiella phoenica (Meyer) and Raoiella rahii (Akbar and Chaudhri). The review also highlighted synonymy with Rarosiella cocosae found on coconut in the Philippines.
    [Show full text]