March 2009 MEDWAY COUNCIL RETAIL NEEDS STUDY CL11788

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

March 2009 MEDWAY COUNCIL RETAIL NEEDS STUDY CL11788 MEDWAY COUNCIL RETAIL NEEDS STUDY CL11788/PW/SPe March 2009 Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners Ltd 14 Regent’s Wharf All Saints Street London N1 9RL T 020 7837 4477 Offices also in: F 020 7837 2277 Cardiff [email protected] Manchester www.nlpplanning.com Newcastle upon Tyne CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................1 The Study .....................................................................................................................1 Content of the Report ...................................................................................................1 2.0 OVERVIEW OF RETAIL AND COMMERCIAL LEISURE TRENDS............................2 Retail Trends ................................................................................................................2 Leisure Trends..............................................................................................................5 3.0 PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT ..................................................................................8 National Policy..............................................................................................................8 Regional Planning Guidance ......................................................................................14 Local Planning Context...............................................................................................16 4.0 THE SHOPPING HIERARCHY AND CATCHMENT AREA ......................................20 Major Shopping Centres in Medway and the Surrounding Area.................................20 Socio-Economic Characteristics within Medway ........................................................25 Summary and Conclusions.........................................................................................28 5.0 DEFINING MEDWAY’S NETWORK OF CENTRES ..................................................29 The Designation of Shopping Centres........................................................................29 6.0 HOUSEHOLD SURVEY .............................................................................................33 Survey Structure.........................................................................................................33 Food and Grocery Shopping.......................................................................................34 Non-Food Shopping....................................................................................................35 Internet Purchases......................................................................................................42 Town/ District Centre Performance.............................................................................42 Leisure Activities.........................................................................................................43 Key Messages from the Household Survey Results...................................................45 7.0 CHATHAM CITY CENTRE.........................................................................................47 Introduction.................................................................................................................47 Mix of Uses and Occupier Representation .................................................................47 Accessibility and Movement .......................................................................................51 Environmental Quality.................................................................................................52 Summary of Chatham’s Strengths and Weaknesses .................................................53 8.0 GILLINGHAM DISTRICT CENTRE............................................................................54 Introduction.................................................................................................................54 Mix of Uses and Occupier Representation .................................................................54 Accessibility and Movement .......................................................................................58 Environmental Quality.................................................................................................59 Summary of Gillingham’s Strengths and Weaknesses...............................................60 9.0 HEMPSTEAD VALLEY DISTRICT CENTRE.............................................................61 Introduction.................................................................................................................61 Mix of Uses and Occupier Representation .................................................................62 Accessibility and Movement .......................................................................................64 Environmental Quality.................................................................................................65 Summary of Hempstead Valley’s Strengths and Weaknesses...................................66 LON\R11727-008 (Final Report) 10.0 RAINHAM DISTRICT CENTRE .................................................................................67 Introduction.................................................................................................................67 Mix of Uses and Occupier Representation .................................................................67 Accessibility and Movement .......................................................................................70 Environmental Quality.................................................................................................71 Summary of Rainham’s Strengths and Weaknesses .................................................72 11.0 ROCHESTER DISTRICT CENTRE............................................................................73 Introduction.................................................................................................................73 Mix of Uses and Occupier Representation .................................................................74 Accessibility and Movement .......................................................................................76 Environmental Quality.................................................................................................77 Summary of Rochester District Centre’s Strengths and Weaknesses........................78 12.0 STROOD DISTRICT CENTRE ...................................................................................80 Introduction.................................................................................................................80 Mix of Uses and Occupier Representation .................................................................81 Accessibility and Movement .......................................................................................83 Environmental Quality.................................................................................................84 Summary of Strood District Centre’s Strengths and Weaknesses .............................85 13.0 THE NEED FOR NEW RETAIL DEVELOPMENT .....................................................87 Introduction.................................................................................................................87 Methodology and Data................................................................................................87 Population and Spending............................................................................................88 Existing Retail Floorspace ..........................................................................................91 Existing Spending Patterns 2008................................................................................91 Quantitative Capacity for Additional Convenience Floorspace...................................94 Quantitative Capacity for Additional Comparison Floorspace ....................................97 The Qualitative Need for Retail Development ............................................................99 Occupier Demand.....................................................................................................103 Conclusions ..............................................................................................................104 14.0 THE NEED FOR COMMERCIAL LEISURE / OTHER TOWN CENTRE USES.......106 Introduction...............................................................................................................106 The Potential for Leisure and Entertainment Uses ...................................................106 Conclusions on Commercial Leisure ........................................................................116 15.0 SCOPE FOR ACCOMMODATING GROWTH .........................................................118 Floorspace Projections .............................................................................................118 Accommodating Future Growth ................................................................................119 Potential Development Opportunities .......................................................................121 Evaluation of Potential Development Sites...............................................................122 16.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................123 Meeting Shopping Needs in Medway .......................................................................123 Commercial Leisure Development within Medway ...................................................126
Recommended publications
  • Appendix B - Local Development Scheme Chart
    Statement of Community Involvement Pre-Submission Public Participation Document Medway Local Development Framework August 2005 Medway Council 1 2 Preface The responses to the initial document called ‘The Statement of Community Involvement Pre–Submission Consultation Stage’ have now been analysed and the document amended where appropriate. A report has also been compiled containing a summary of representations to the document and the Council’s response, which is attached to this document. The amended SCI document is called the “Statement of Community Involvement Submission Draft ”. It is now available to the public and the Council is seeking your views on the proposed community involvement policy set out within it. All the documents including the response form can be downloaded from http://www.medway.gov.uk/ If you would like to make any comments please use one of the following methods. Send your written comments by post to: The Assistant Director, Regeneration and Environment Division, Medway Council, Compass Centre, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent ME4 4YH Or send via e-mail to: [email protected] Or send by fax to: 01634 331125 Please note that comments cannot be treated as confidential. The start date for consultation is All comments must be received by If you require any assistance or would like to discuss any aspects of the new planning framework please feel free to contact and speak to one of our planners within the Development Plans & Research section: Wendy Lane - Development Plans and Research Manager ext. 331533 Bob Enderson - Senior Planning Officer ext. 331290 Morgan Slade - Senior Planning Officer ext 331028 Bryan Geake - Senior Planning Officer ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Property Address Primary Liable Party Name Last Rateable Va
    Full Property Address Primary Liable party name Last Rateable Va NDR Valuation Description Total Liability Account Start date 02 015674 At Tq 75973/65172 On Corner Of, Cherbourg Crescent, Wayfield Road, Ch Telefonica O2 (Uk) Ltd 2850 Communication Station and Premises 1342.35 01/04/2005 02 At Tq76679/68817 King Charles Hotel, Brompton Road, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5QTTelefonica O2 (Uk) Ltd 11750 Communication Station and premises 5534.25 01/04/2005 02 At Tq76945/66906, Luton Road, Chatham, Kent, ME4 5BS Telefonica Uk Ltd 2850 Communication Station and Premises 1342.35 01/04/2005 1 Alpha House,Laser Quay, Culpeper Close, Frindsbury, Rochester, Kent, ME2 4HU Brett Construction Ltd 10000 OFFICES AND PREMISES 4710 01/10/2012 1 Ashdown House, Walderslade Centre, Walderslade Road, Chatham, Kent, ME4 9LR Peach & Co (Chatham) Ltd 9800 Offices and Premises 4723.6 01/06/2011 1 Ashford House,Beaufort Court, Sir Thomas Longley Road, Frindsbury, Rochester, KeNexus Alpha Limited 6800 OFFICES AND PREMISES 3202.8 26/03/2007 1 Epsilon House,Laser Quay, Culpeper Close, Frindsbury, Rochester, Kent, ME2 4HU Dalby Consutling Limited 10000 OFFICES AND PREMISES 3243.73 28/04/2014 1 Loaland Business Centre, Maritime Close, Frindsbury Extra, Rochester, Kent, ME2 5 Electraweld Ltd 10500 WORKSHOP AND PREMISES 4945.5 01/04/1990 1 Michael Gill Building, Tolgate Lane, Strood, Rochester, Kent, ME2 4TG Data redacted 11750 Shop and Premises 5534.25 27/08/2013 1 Neptune Business Estate, Neptune Close, Frindsbury, Rochester, Kent, ME2 4LT Becker Uk Ltd 11250 WAREHOUSE AND
    [Show full text]
  • O/S 310, Luton Road
    Full Property Address Property Reference Number Primary Liable party name Current Rateable Value (3208/0061) O/S 310, Luton Road, Chatham, Kent, ME4 5BX 0445031001N Clear Channel Uk Ltd 600 Arqiva Roof Top (Shared 166074), Strood Ate, St Mary'S Road, Strood, Rochester, Kent, ME2 4DF 2635000070 Arqiva Ltd 41750 Pt 1st Flr, Medway Arts Centre, The Brook, Dock Road, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4SE 0254080310N Medway Council - Culture And Community Finance Team 4900 (3208/0058) O/S 92, Chatham Hill, Chatham, Kent, ME5 7AL 0211009420N Clear Channel Uk Ltd 600 (3208/0059) Adj Upper Luton Road/, Luton Road, Chatham, Kent, ME4 5AA 0444081210N Clear Channel Uk Ltd 600 (3208/0060) Opp York Hill, Luton Road, Chatham, Kent, ME4 5AA 0445081010N Clear Channel Uk Ltd 600 (3208/0062) O/S Crest Hotel, Maidstone Road, Chatham, Kent, ME5 9SE 0450083301N Clear Channel Uk Ltd 600 (3208/0064) O/S, 304, City Way, Rochester, Kent, ME1 2BL 1240030420N Clear Channel Uk Ltd 600 (3208/0067) O/S 120, Bligh Way, Strood, Rochester, Kent, ME2 2XG 2157000121N Clear Channel Uk Ltd 300 (3208/0068) Opp Whitegates Service Station, Gravesend Road, Strood, Rochester, Kent, ME2 3PW 2393011811N Clear Channel Uk Ltd 600 (3208/0069) Opp, 3, High Street, Strood, Rochester, Kent, ME2 4AB 2419000020N Clear Channel Uk Ltd 600 (3208/0072) O/S Post Office, North Street, Strood, Rochester, Kent, ME2 4SX 2546001520N Clear Channel Uk Ltd 300 (3208/0073) Opp St Marys Road, North Street, Strood, Rochester, Kent, ME2 4SN 2546001620N Clear Channel Uk Ltd 300 (3208/0074) O/S, 118, Watling Street, Strood,
    [Show full text]
  • Strood Waterfront Development Brief
    Strood Waterfront Development Brief 2018 View from former Civic Centre site across to Rochester Contents Executive Summary 1.0 Introduction 2.0 The Vision and Opportunity 3.0 Strood Waterfront Today 4.0 Planning and Design Principles Appendix 1: Policy References Appendix 2: Illustrative Masterplan Appendix 3: Flood Defence Planning Application Appendix 4: Transport Statement Executive Summary The council, its partners and other stakeholders have come together to agree a vision for a new waterfront community with a range of homes to meet the needs of Medway's population – all set within new and improved public spaces that take advantage of these sites' superb setting. 1. Former Civic Centre Site 2. Third-Party Land 3. Watermill Wharf N 4. Kingswear Gardens 5. Watermill Gardens 6. Strood Riverside 7. Riverside Tavern 8. Land at Jane's Creek 6 7 4 5 2 2 3 1 8 Map 1: Waterfront Sites Strood Waterfront consists of a number of high value The Waterfront has the potential to become a stunning opportunity sites, which together can deliver significant new face for Strood, transforming perceptions of positive change to Strood District Centre and the the area and contributing to wider regeneration Authority as a whole. The Waterfront sites offer an initiatives for the Town Centre and across the Medway exceptional opportunity that demands an exemplar of conurbation. sustainable, waterfront development. Medway Council is both the local planning authority and the landowner Strood has a vibrant High Street and locational for the majority of the Waterfront sites and now wishes advantages including high-speed rail services into to work with development partners to regenerate these London and ease of access to Kent’s countryside sites and transform Strood's waterfront.
    [Show full text]
  • To Let A1 /A2/A3/A4 Premises 1,517 Sq Ft (141 Sq M)
    Rochester Riverside Station Square NEAR ME1 1NH RETAIL • CAFE • BAR TO LET A1 /A2/A3/A4 PREMISES 1,517 SQ FT (141 SQ M) Development by Rochester Riverside Station Square A1/A2/A3/A4 Premises • TO LET Gravesend Road 1 A289 A228 Location Situation FRINDSBURY A229 1 A2 Rochester is a historic town within the county of Kent, The premises forms part of the Rochester Riverside M2 DOWNSIDE Rochester Riverside England. Rochester and its neighbours, Chatham, regeneration scheme which is set to deliver some STROOD High Street A2 Station Square Gillingham, Strood form a large single urban 1,400 new homes over the next 11 years. The subject Cuxton Road BROMPTON area known as the Medway Towns with a resident property is situated at the heart of the scheme, A231 A231 population in excess of 250,000. The Medway Towns adjacent to a convenience store and 81 room 2 ROCHESTER are an established commercial and industrial centre, Travelodge overlooking the River Medway. RIVER MEDWAY located approximately 37 miles south east of Central A228 The main line railway station is just a few minutes’ walk Maidstone Road A2 London and 45 miles north west of the Channel Ports Sundridge Hill 2 A229 offering regular services to London and the coast. The B2097 CHATHAM at Dover and Folkestone. A228 A2 historic Rochester High Street and Cathedral are also CUXTON M2 City Way A230 Rochester is accessed via the A2 which crosses the a short walk away. BORSTAL ROCHESTER Maidstone Road River Medway at Rochester Bridge. The town is easily EAST WARD accessible via motorway located between Junctions 2 and 3 of the M2 which provides access to the M25 13 Sat Nav miles (21km) north west and to Canterbury, 31 miles A40 M25 CHELMSFORD Near to ME1 1NH (50km) south east.
    [Show full text]
  • Limits to the Mega-City Region: Contrasting Local and Regional Needs Turok, Ivan
    www.ssoar.info Limits to the mega-city region: contrasting local and regional needs Turok, Ivan Postprint / Postprint Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: www.peerproject.eu Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Turok, I. (2009). Limits to the mega-city region: contrasting local and regional needs. Regional Studies, 43(6), 845-862. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903095261 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter dem "PEER Licence Agreement zur This document is made available under the "PEER Licence Verfügung" gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zum PEER-Projekt finden Agreement ". For more Information regarding the PEER-project Sie hier: http://www.peerproject.eu Gewährt wird ein nicht see: http://www.peerproject.eu This document is solely intended exklusives, nicht übertragbares, persönliches und beschränktes for your personal, non-commercial use.All of the copies of Recht auf Nutzung dieses Dokuments. Dieses Dokument this documents must retain all copyright information and other ist ausschließlich für den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen information regarding legal protection. You are not allowed to alter Gebrauch bestimmt. Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments this document in any way, to copy it for public or commercial müssen alle Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise purposes, to exhibit the document in public, to perform, distribute auf gesetzlichen Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses or otherwise use the document in public. Dokument nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated Sie dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke conditions of use. vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Mit der Verwendung dieses Dokuments erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen an.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Service Improvement Plan (Bsip) 2021-2026
    <DRAFT> BUS SERVICE IMPROVEMENT PLAN (BSIP) 2021-2026 SECTION 1 – OVERVIEW 1.1 Context and BSIP extent 1.1.1 This Bus Service Improvement Plan covers the whole of the Medway Council area, for which there will be a single Enhanced Partnership. Fig 1- Location of Medway 1.1.2 It is not intended to cover services which are excluded from the English National Concessionary Travel Scheme, even where these may be registered as local bus services in the Medway area. 1.1.3 We are working collaboratively with our colleagues at Kent County Council, who are producing a BSIP for their own area. However, our plans remain separate for a number of reasons: 1. Only a handful of routes offer inter-urban cross-boundary travel. 2. Although the Medway/Kent boundary cuts through the Lordswood and Walderslade areas, with one exception, services crossing this boundary in the contiguous urban area are effectively short extensions of Medway-focussed routes. 3. Medway is primarily an urban area with a small rural hinterland; Kent is a large rural county with a plethora of widely dispersed urban settlements. 4. Medway's socio-economic make up is considerably different to that of Kent as a whole. It is a lower wage economy, while more than 35% of jobs are in lower skilled categories, compared to under 30% in Kent, and even fewer in the wider south east (source: ONS annual population survey via nomisweb.co.uk). Indices of Multiple Deprivation are much poorer in Medway than in Kent (see appendix 1). 5. As a unitary authority, Medway Council has certain powers that are not available to Kent County Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Messages Report Nov 1 Copy.Pptx
    FACEBOOK Blah blah Messages etc.. ENGAGEMENT ANALYSIS CHARTS The chart in this document is collated daily by us as part of our commitment to ensure the marketing we conduct at our schemes is as social as it is effective for both the centres and their tenants. The statistics represent independent figures provided by Facebook and is based on the algorithms they run evaluating the relative performance of Pages and Posts relative to ‘Engagement’, measuring reactions, comments and shares. Messages PR harvest figures for 240 UK Shopping Centres and present them in a tabular form. We display the results in relative terms, which allows us to judge the performance of Pages when comparing the size of schemes and the number of ‘Page likes’ they enjoy. We also show the absolute positions where more Page likes, bigger budgets and boosts all work to generate increased engagement. Messages PR deliver astonishing results, regardless of how they are measured. In this vital Christmas sales period, our centres were placed within 10 of the top 20 places in relative terms and occupied the entire top 7. Even in absolute terms we placed 4 schemes in the top 10 UK Centre pages. Pentagon, Chatham was also number one in absolute terms, the best performing UK Shopping Scheme on Facebook, outperforming the mega centre Bluewater. Similarly Parkway in Middlesbrough outperformed The Metro Centre and Grays outperformed intu Lakeside by significant margins as you can see from the charts. We do not achieve these results by clever tweaking of posts, giveaways or boosts – It is because the work we undertake is genuinely social that we generate extraordinary results on social media.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Kent Property Market
    2019 Kent Property Market Cover: Caxtons’ Property Market Analysis Chapel Down Winery opened its new state-of-the art brewery and visitor centre, Curious Brewery in Ashford town centre in May 2019. The brewery includes a shop, tasting area, bar and restaurant. Photo: Curious Brewery / Ashley Gendek Photography Limited 04 10 16 Caxtons’ Property Market Outlook Industrial and Distribution Performance Rural Performance While the UK economy has succeeded in The weakness of sterling driven by It is remarkable how resilient the farmland withstanding a significant level of Brexit Brexit uncertainty has assisted exporting market has been this year, report Savills. related uncertainty over recent years, recent manufacturing companies to an extent, intensification is taking its toll on activity. but confidence and business investment 20 remains weak. This has not been reflected Residential Performance 06 in the industrial and logistics sectors which According to analysis for this report by Business Park Performance continue to deliver robust returns. Hometrack, Kent markets have generally Despite the uncertain political and economic outperformed the south east average with backdrop, the business park market in the 12 price growth of 0.18% over the 12 months south east has proved relatively buoyant Retail Performance to end of July. This compares with growth over the last year, contrasting with a more Vacant units are gradually being absorbed of 2.1% for the UK as a whole. subdued previous 12 month period. and independent retailers and restaurants are expanding their presence on the county’s 08 high streets, facilitated by the nationwide rent Office Performance rebase of recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Project Business Case Strood Civic Centre Flood Mitigation Works
    Capital Project Business Case Strood Civic Centre Flood Mitigation Works The template This document provides the business case template for projects seeking funding which is made available through the South East Local Enterprise Partnership. It is therefore designed to satisfy all SELEP governance processes, approvals by the Strategic Board, the Accountability Board and also the early requirements of the Independent Technical Evaluation process where applied. It is also designed to be applicable across all funding streams made available by Government through SELEP. It should be filled in by the scheme promoter – defined as the final beneficiary of funding. In most cases, this is the local authority; but in some cases the local authority acts as Accountable Body for a private sector final beneficiary. In those circumstances, the private sector beneficiary would complete this application and the SELEP team would be on hand, with local partners in the federated boards, to support the promoter. Please note that this template should be completed in accordance with the guidelines laid down in the HM Treasury’s Green Book. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-green-book-appraisal-and-evaluation- in-central-governent As described below, there are likely to be two phases of completion of this template. The first, an ‘outline business case’ stage, should see the promoter include as much information as would be appropriate for submission though SELEP to Government calls for projects where the amount awarded to the project is not yet known. If successful, the second stage of filling this template in would be informed by clarity around funding and would therefore South East LEP Capital Project Business Case Page 1 of 124 require a fully completed business case, inclusive of the economic appraisal which is sought below.
    [Show full text]
  • North Kent Strategic Housing and Economic Needs Assessment
    A Bilfinger Real Estate company GVA 65 Gresham Street London EC2V 7NQ North Kent Strategic Housing and Economic Needs Assessment Baseline Report March 2015 Gravesham Borough Council and Medway Council NK SHENA March 2015 gva.co.uk 2 Gravesham Borough Council and Medway Council NK SHENA Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 5 2. NORTH KENT POPULATION ............................................................................................ 9 3. NORTH KENT FUTURE POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLDS .......................................61 4. NORTH KENT HOUSING CONTEXT ...............................................................................69 5. NORTH KENT ECONOMY ...............................................................................................93 6. NORTH KENT RETAIL AND TOWN CENTRES ............................................................145 7. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................202 March 2015 gva.co.uk 3 Gravesham Borough Council and Medway Council NK SHENA March 2015 gva.co.uk 4 Gravesham Borough Council and Medway Council NK SHENA 1. Introduction 1.1 This report provides a baseline evidence base to support the production of the North Kent Strategic Housing and Economic Needs Assessment (SHENA). The SHENA is comprised of q Strategic Housing Market Assessment, Employment Land Review, Retail Needs Assessment and Viability Assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Strood Waterfront Development Brief 2017
    Strood Waterfront Development Brief November 2017 View from former Civic Centre site across to Rochester STROOD WATERFRONT CONSULTATION Medway Council is refreshing the 2006 Strood Riverside Development Brief to reflect changes since 2006, includ- ing changes to national planning policy. This has resulted in the draft Strood Waterfront Development Brief 2017, which highlights refreshed aspirations for the sites and design principles. The draft 2017 Development Brief focusses on three main sites; Strood Riverside, former Civic Centre and King- swear Gardens. The Development Brief 2017 provides a vision and guidance for the consideration of development propos- als along the Strood Waterfront area, attracting investment to further regenerate the area. It is intended that the Strood Waterfront Development Brief, once adopted will be a Supplementary Planning Document, which will provide guidance to potential developers and therefore be a material consideration in determining future planning proposals for the sites. The Development Brief itself is not a planning application but it is expected that future planning applications for these sites will follow the guidance in the Development Brief. We want to hear your comments on the design principles in the draft Development Brief, which looks at building heights, greenspace, river walks and transport. Your comments will shape these principles and the future regeneration of Strood Waterfront. After public consultation your comments will be fed back into refining the draft Development Brief where consid- ered appropriate. The revised Development Brief will then be submitted to Medway Council’s Cabinet for formal adoption as a Supplementary Planning Document, which will influence future planning applications for Strood Waterfront.
    [Show full text]