DOCSLIB.ORG

Pakistan April 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pakistan April 2006 COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT PAKISTAN APRIL 2006 RDS-IND COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION SERVICE PAKISTAN APRIL 2006 Contents Paragraphs 1. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT .................................................................... 1.01 2. GEOGRAPHY .................................................................................. 2.01 General.................................................................................... 2.01 Languages ............................................................................... 2.06 3. ECONOMY ...................................................................................... 3.01 4. HISTORY ........................................................................................ 4.01 Independence to October 1999 coup ........................................ 4.01 General Musharraf’s regime up to 2001 .................................... 4.02 The Taliban and events following 11 September 2001............. 4.06 Militant groups in 2002/2002 referendum.................................. 4.08 Constitutional amendments/2002-03 elections......................... 4.10 Militant Islamists/Line of Control (2003).................................... 4.15 Legal Framework Order/Assassination attempts/ Summit with India (2003–2004)......................................... 4.17 Political events and terrorism in 2004....................................... 4.20 Political events and terrorism in 2005....................................... 4.30 South Asia earthquake 08 October 2005 …………………………4.32 Madrassas – expulsion of foreign students and registration ...4.34 Political events and terrorism in 2006 ....................................... 4.35 5. STATE STRUCTURES ....................................................................... 5.01 The Constitution ......................................................................... 5.01 Overview.................................................................................. 5.01 Citizenship and Nationality (including fraudulent documents) .... 5.05 Political system........................................................................... 5.09 Introduction..................................................................................5.09 Main political parties following the coup ................................... 5.11 Federal Legislature .................................................................. 5.13 Judiciary...................................................................................... 5.15 Legal rights/detention ...................................................................5.19 Court system............................................................................ 5.19 Anti-Terrorism Act and Courts.................................................. 5.24 Federally Administered Tribal Areas......................................... 5.27 Tribal Justice System ..................................................................5.29 Sharia Law............................................................................... 5.31 Hudood Ordinances ................................................................. 5.33 Qisas and Diyat Ordinances..................................................... 5.37 Blasphemy Laws...................................................................... 5.39 National Accountability Bureau (NAB) ...................................... 5.44 Arbitrary arrest ......................................................................... 5.48 Death penalty ..............................................................................5.52 Internal security.......................................................................... 5.56 Police....................................................................................... 5.56 Army ........................................................................................ 5.58 Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI)...................................................5.61 Prisons and prison conditions.....................................................5.62 Military service ...............................................................................5.68 Medical services.............................................................................5.69 Educational system .......................................................................5.74 6. HUMAN RIGHTS .............................................................................. 6.01 6.A HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES ................................................................... 6.01 General ........................................................................................ 6.01 ii This Country of Origin Information Report contains the most up-to-date publicly available information as at 10 March 2006. Older source material has been included where it contains relevant information not available in more recent documents. APRIL 2006 PAKISTAN Overview.................................................................................. 6.01 Human rights groups................................................................ 6.06 Police....................................................................................... 6.10 Torture ..................................................................................... 6.16 Freedom of speech and media .................................................. 6.18 Overview.................................................................................. 6.18 Journalists................................................................................ 6.22 Freedom of religion .......................................................................6.26 Overview .........................................................................................6.26 Background and demography.....................................................6.26 Policies and Constitutional provisions ...................................... 6.32 Hudood Ordinances and Blasphemy Laws ................................6.40 Voting rights............................................................................. 6.45 Ahmadis ...................................................................................... 6.49 Introduction..................................................................................6.49 Ahmadi Headquarters, Rabwah..................................................6.53 Lahori Ahmadis ...........................................................................6.57 Legislative restrictions.................................................................6.58 Passport Declaration................................................................ 6.62 Bai’at............................................................................................6.63 Current situation ..........................................................................6.64 Christians........................................................................................6.72 Introduction..................................................................................6.72 Current situation ..........................................................................6.74 Shi’a and Sunni Muslims – historical theological differences .................................. 6.78 Pakistan’s Shi’as (aka Shi’i or Shi’ites)..................................... 6.83 Freedom of assembly and association ..................................... 6.87 Overview.................................................................................. 6.87 Political activists ..........................................................................6.92 Employment rights.........................................................................6.94 People trafficking...........................................................................6.103 Freedom of movement ..................................................................6.110 6.B HUMAN RIGHTS - SPECIFIC GROUPS ...................................................6.112 Mohajirs....................................................................................... 6.112 Overview.................................................................................. 6.112 Formation of MQM ......................................................................6.113 Current situation ..........................................................................6.116 Women ........................................................................................ 6.118 Overview.................................................................................. 6.118 Legal provisions ....................................................................... 6.121 Discriminatory legislation.......................................................... 6.123 National Commission on the Status of Women ........................ 6.134 Family law and marriage .......................................................... 6.136 Domestic violence.................................................................... 6.142 Honour killings ......................................................................... 6.145 Rape ........................................................................................ 6.151 Assistance available to women ................................................ 6.157 Treatment of women in detention ............................................. 6.161 Political representation............................................................. 6.162 Property and inheritance rights...................................................6.163
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Committee on Foreign Affairs
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Committee on Foreign Affairs Brussels, 27 July 2004 REPORT OF AD HOC DELEGATION VISITS TO KASHMIR (8-11 DECEMBER 2003 AND 20-24 JUNE 2004) Introduction As part of the European Parliament's contribution to helping shape EU policy on the Kashmir issue, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy decided to send a delegation to both parts of Kashmir, and to the respective national capitals of Pakistan and India. The delegation's objective was to meet with a wide spectrum of political and public opinion, to learn their views on current developments and hopes for the future, and to see the situation on the ground at first- hand. For timetabling and logistical reasons, it was decided that the visit to the two sides (Islamabad and Pakistan-administered Kashmir (known as Azaad Jammu and Kashmir - AJK - on the Pakistan side) -, and to New Delhi and Jammu and Kashmir - Indian- administered Kashmir, would have to take place separately. The first visit took place from 8-11 December 2003; the second, originally planned for the spring of 2004 was delayed because of the elections which were unexpectedly called in India, and finally took place from 20-25 June 2004. It was stressed throughout the preparatory phases that the two delegation visits should be undertaken by the same Members - which, with one exception, was the case - and that the two visits should aim to follow similar programmes in order to ensure continuity and for a balanced comparison to be made. The delegation was led by John Walls Cushnahan, and in December 2003 included Bob van den Bos, David Bowe, Glyn Ford, Jas Gawronski, Reinhold Messner and Luisa Morgantini.
    [Show full text]
  • View Full Text
    The Role of Political Parties in the 2002 National Elections of Pakistan Altaf Ullah ∗ Major decisions of the government in democratic countries, rest directly or indirectly on the freely given consent of a majority of the adult elected representatives of the citizens. The formal process of selecting a person for public office or accepting or rejecting a political proposal, by voting is called election. An election is one of the means by which a society may arrange itself to take the decisions of their national interest. It is a process for choosing offices or making binding decisions concerning policy by the vote of those formally qualified to participate. Indeed it is a formal procedure by which public offices are filled. Elections and political parties have a direct relationship with each other. Election is the mechanism through which modern states create amongst its citizens a sense of involvement and participation in public affairs. Citizens derive a sense of satisfaction from participating in the selection of their governmental leaders, and the selection of leaders through proper election procedures gives to the government a base of support, a sense of legitimacy among the masses. It is through popular elections that authority of a government is clothed with legitimacy and peaceful transfer of authority to elected representatives is ensured. When the election programmes were announced by the government both small and big parties applied for the eighth national parliamentary elections. The major parities contesting the elections included Pakistan People’s Party Parliamentarians, Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz Group), Pakistan Muslim League (Quaid-i-Azam Group) and the Muttahida Majlis-i-Amal (MMA), an alliance of six religious political ∗ Research Fellow, National Institute of Historical and Cultural Research, Centre of Excellence, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamist Politics in South Asia After the Arab Spring: Parties and Their Proxies Working With—And Against—The State
    RETHINKING POLITICAL ISLAM SERIES August 2015 Islamist politics in South Asia after the Arab Spring: Parties and their proxies working with—and against—the state WORKING PAPER Matthew J. Nelson, SOAS, University of London SUMMARY: Mainstream Islamist parties in Pakistan such as the Jama’at-e Islami and the Jamiat-e-Ulema-e-Islam have demonstrated a tendency to combine the gradualism of Brotherhood-style electoral politics with dawa (missionary) activities and, at times, support for proxy militancy. As a result, Pakistani Islamists wield significant ideological influence in Pakistan, even as their electoral success remains limited. About this Series: The Rethinking Political Islam series is an innovative effort to understand how the developments following the Arab uprisings have shaped—and in some cases altered—the strategies, agendas, and self-conceptions of Islamist movements throughout the Muslim world. The project engages scholars of political Islam through in-depth research and dialogue to provide a systematic, cross-country comparison of the trajectory of political Islam in 12 key countries: Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Syria, Jordan, Libya, Pakistan, as well as Malaysia and Indonesia. This is accomplished through three stages: A working paper for each country, produced by an author who has conducted on-the-ground research and engaged with the relevant Islamist actors. A reaction essay in which authors reflect on and respond to the other country cases. A final draft incorporating the insights gleaned from the months of dialogue and discussion. The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit organization devoted to independent research and policy solutions. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Authoritarianism and Political Party Reforms in Pakistan
    AUTHORITARIANISM AND POLITICAL PARTY REFORM IN PAKISTAN Asia Report N°102 – 28 September 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. PARTIES BEFORE MUSHARRAF............................................................................. 2 A. AFTER INDEPENDENCE..........................................................................................................2 B. THE FIRST MILITARY GOVERNMENT.....................................................................................3 C. CIVILIAN RULE AND MILITARY INTERVENTION.....................................................................4 D. DISTORTED DEMOCRACY......................................................................................................5 III. POLITICAL PARTIES UNDER MUSHARRAF ...................................................... 6 A. CIVILIAN ALLIES...................................................................................................................6 B. MANIPULATING SEATS..........................................................................................................7 C. SETTING THE STAGE .............................................................................................................8 IV. A PARTY OVERVIEW ............................................................................................... 11 A. THE MAINSTREAM:.............................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan Page 1 of 16
    Pakistan Page 1 of 16 2005 Human Rights Report Released | Daily Press Briefing | Other News... Pakistan Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 8, 2006 Pakistan is a federal republic with a population of approximately 163 million. The head of state is President and Chief of Army Staff Pervez Musharraf who assumed power after overthrowing the civilian government in 1999. The head of government is Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz, whom the national assembly elected over opposition parties' objections in 2004. Domestic and international observers found the 2002national assembly elections, the most recent national elections, deeply flawed. The civilian authorities maintained control of the security forces; however, there were instances when local police acted independently of government authority. The government's human rights record was poor, and serious problems remained. The following human rights problems were reported: restrictions on citizens' right to change their government extrajudicial killings, torture, and rape poor prison conditions, arbitrary arrest, and lengthy pretrial detention violations of due process and privacy rights lack of judicial independence harassment, intimidation, and arrest of journalists limits on freedom of association, religion, and movement imprisonment of political leaders corruption legal and societal discrimination against women child abuse trafficking in women and children, and child prostitution discrimination against persons with disabilities indentured, bonded, and child labor restriction of worker rights The government took significant steps to combat trafficking in persons. Its Anti-Trafficking Unit (ATU) was fully functional and resulted in increased arrests and prosecutions of human traffickers. Cooperative efforts between the military, ATU, and international organizations prevented any increase in human trafficking resulting from the October 8 earthquake.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Faith in the Charity and Development Sector in Karachi and Sindh, Pakistan
    Religions and Development Research Programme The Role of Faith in the Charity and Development Sector in Karachi and Sindh, Pakistan Nida Kirmani Research Fellow, Religions and Development Research Programme, International Development Department, University of Birmingham Sarah Zaidi Independent researcher Working Paper 50- 2010 Religions and Development Research Programme The Religions and Development Research Programme Consortium is an international research partnership that is exploring the relationships between several major world religions, development in low-income countries and poverty reduction. The programme is comprised of a series of comparative research projects that are addressing the following questions: z How do religious values and beliefs drive the actions and interactions of individuals and faith-based organisations? z How do religious values and beliefs and religious organisations influence the relationships between states and societies? z In what ways do faith communities interact with development actors and what are the outcomes with respect to the achievement of development goals? The research aims to provide knowledge and tools to enable dialogue between development partners and contribute to the achievement of development goals. We believe that our role as researchers is not to make judgements about the truth or desirability of particular values or beliefs, nor is it to urge a greater or lesser role for religion in achieving development objectives. Instead, our aim is to produce systematic and reliable knowledge and better understanding of the social world. The research focuses on four countries (India, Pakistan, Nigeria and Tanzania), enabling the research team to study most of the major world religions: Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Sikhism, Buddhism and African traditional belief systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Between India and Pakistan Roots of Modern Conflict
    Conflict between India and Pakistan Roots of Modern Conflict Conflict between India and Pakistan Peter Lyon Conflict in Afghanistan Ludwig W. Adamec and Frank A. Clements Conflict in the Former Yugoslavia John B. Allcock, Marko Milivojevic, and John J. Horton, editors Conflict in Korea James E. Hoare and Susan Pares Conflict in Northern Ireland Sydney Elliott and W. D. Flackes Conflict between India and Pakistan An Encyclopedia Peter Lyon Santa Barbara, California Denver, Colorado Oxford, England Copyright 2008 by ABC-CLIO, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lyon, Peter, 1934– Conflict between India and Pakistan : an encyclopedia / Peter Lyon. p. cm. — (Roots of modern conflict) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-57607-712-2 (hard copy : alk. paper) ISBN 978-1-57607-713-9 (ebook) 1. India—Foreign relations—Pakistan—Encyclopedias. 2. Pakistan-Foreign relations— India—Encyclopedias. 3. India—Politics and government—Encyclopedias. 4. Pakistan— Politics and government—Encyclopedias. I. Title. DS450.P18L86 2008 954.04-dc22 2008022193 12 11 10 9 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Production Editor: Anna A. Moore Production Manager: Don Schmidt Media Editor: Jason Kniser Media Resources Manager: Caroline Price File Management Coordinator: Paula Gerard This book is also available on the World Wide Web as an eBook.
    [Show full text]
  • Honour Killing in Sindh Men's and Women's Divergent Accounts
    Honour Killing in Sindh Men's and Women's Divergent Accounts Shahnaz Begum Laghari PhD University of York Women’s Studies March 2016 Abstract The aim of this project is to investigate the phenomenon of honour-related violence, the most extreme form of which is honour killing. The research was conducted in Sindh (one of the four provinces of Pakistan). The main research question is, ‘Are these killings for honour?’ This study was inspired by a need to investigate whether the practice of honour killing in Sindh is still guided by the norm of honour or whether other elements have come to the fore. It is comprised of the experiences of those involved in honour killings through informal, semi- structured, open-ended, in-depth interviews, conducted under the framework of the qualitative method. The aim of my thesis is to apply a feminist perspective in interpreting the data to explore the tradition of honour killing and to let the versions of the affected people be heard. In my research, the women who are accused as karis, having very little redress, are uncertain about their lives; they speak and reveal the motives behind the allegations and killings in the name of honour. The male killers, whom I met inside and outside the jails, justify their act of killing in the name of honour, culture, tradition and religion. Drawing upon interviews with thirteen women and thirteen men, I explore and interpret the data to reveal their childhood, educational, financial and social conditions and the impacts of these on their lives, thoughts and actions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Direct Flight to Revolution: Maududi, Divine Sovereignty, and the -Moment in Iran∗
    A Direct Flight to Revolution: Maududi, Divine Sovereignty, and the -Moment in Iran∗ SIMON WOLFGANG FUCHS Abstract This article explores the engagement of the Pakistani Jamaʿat-i Islami (JI) with the Iranian Revolu- tion. I argue that the Islamist JI was drawn to the events because it reflected a core concern and signature idea of Abu ’l-Aʿla Maududi, namely to establish the sovereignty of God (hakimiyya) on earth. My analysis of various travelogues and JI publications from the s demonstrates that JI observers were deeply familiar with internal revolutionary dynamics and Iran’s Shiʿi identity. The prospect of seeing a proper Islamic system in action, with potentially global consequences for their cause, initially crowded out any sectarian concerns for the JI. At the same time, certain JI leaders began to voice criticism of what they perceived as rash revolutionary policies that differed from Maududi’s careful, irenic understanding of a proper Islamic revolution. They also took note of sectarian messages that damaged Iran’s ecumenical outreach. It was, however, the more general geopolitical climate in the Middle East and South Asia which forced the JI to publicly downplay its ties with Iran. By the late s, being accused of harbouring affinities for the ‘deviant Islam’ of Shiʿism was a charge that had to be avoided at all costs in Pakistan and beyond. Keywords: Iranian Revolution; Jamaʿat-i Islami; Abu ’l-Aʿla Maududi; hakimiyya; sectarianism; Islamism; Pakistan; Islamic Revolution Mian Tufayl Muhammad (d. ) did not hesitate when the opportunity arose to observe divine sovereignty (hakimiyya) in action. The leader (amir) of the Pakistani Jamaʿat-i Islami (JI) since and successor to the influential Islamist ideologue Abu ’l-Aʿla Maududi (d.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Proceeding Second Indo-Pak Locust Officers Border Meeting 2018 Year 2018 / No
    JOINT PROCEEDING SECOND INDO-PAK LOCUST OFFICERS BORDER MEETING 2018 YEAR 2018 / NO. 2 Period : 01-31 July, 2018 LOCUST SITUATION INDIA : Distant, cross country and LOCUST SITUATION PAKISTAN : The routine fortnightly special border surveys on locust in the Scheduled Desert Areas locust surveys were carried out in the summer-monsoon breeding areas of Nara and Tharparkar deserts in Sindh, (SDA) of India were conducted by 11 Locust Circle Offices Cholistan desert in Punjab and overlapping area of Uthal in (Jaisalmer, Barmer, Bikaner, Suratgarh, Churu, Nagaur, Phalodi, Balochistan during the reporting period. A total number of 403 Jodhpur, Jalore, Palanpur and Bhuj) in their respective localities were surveyed. No gregarious locust activity was jurisdiction and surveyed 282 localities. Based on the survey found in Pakistan .However, isolated mature solitarious adults data/observations, India remained free from gregarious as well were seen at four localities southeast of Bahawalpur (285832N-711738E) in Cholistan Desert with a density of 12 as solitary desert locust activities. adults/ hectare on 24-07-2018. Locust survey : 01-31 July, 2018 Low density solitary adults INDIA PAKISTAN Rajasthan Gujarat Desert Locust Desert Locust Present L = Present Absent N = Absent Low density solitary desert locust adult were seen at four localities southeast of Bahawalpur (Pakistan) near Indo-Pak border during the survey whereas India remain free from any locust activities. ECOLOGY AND WEATHER: Rainfall estimates (11-20 July 2018) shows moderate to heavy rainfall in the SDA of India and light to heavy in locust potential breeding areas in Pakistan. Greenness estimates of 2nd decade of July, 2018 indicate fresh vegetation patches in the areas of Bikaner, Nagaur, Churu, Suratgarh, Barmer, Jaisalmer and Bhuj of India and Surface vegetation was observed green/ greening in Bahawalpur, Rahimyar Khan and Mirpur Khas areas of Pakistan except Sukkur area where it was observed dry during the survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Jago Pakistan Wake Up, Pakistan
    Members of The Century Foundation International Working Group on Pakistan Pakistan Jago Thomas R. Pickering Working Group Chair Jean-Marie Guéhenno President, Vice Chairman, Hills and Company; former U.S. International Crisis Group Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Nobuaki Tanaka Former Japanese Robert P. Finn Principal Investigator Ambassador to Turkey and Pakistan Non-Resident Fellow, Liechtenstein Institute on Self-Determination, Princeton University; Ann Wilkens Former Chair, Swedish Pakistan Up, Wake former U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan Committee for Afghanistan; former Swedish Ambassador to Pakistan and Afghanistan Michael Wahid Hanna Principal Investigator Senior Fellow, The Century Foundation Pakistan Mosharraf Zaidi Principal Investigator Tariq Banuri Professor in the Departments Campaign Director, Alif Ailaan of Economics and City and Metropolitan United States Planning at the University of Utah Steve Coll Dean, Columbia University Graduate Imtiaz Gul Executive Director, Center for School of Journalism Research and Security Studies Cameron Munter Professor of Practice in Ishrat Husain Dean and Director of the International Relations, Pomona College; Institute of Business Administration, Karachi former U.S. Ambassador to Pakistan Jago Asma Jahangir Advocate of the Supreme Barnett Rubin Senior Fellow and Associate Court of Pakistan; Chairperson, Human Director, Afghanistan Pakistan Regional Rights Commission of Pakistan Program, New York University Center on International Cooperation; former Senior Riaz Khohkar Former
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Syed Journal of Education & Social Research Abdul Sattar Edhi In
    Sir Syed Journal of Education & Social Research Vol. 3, Issue 4, 2020 (October – December) ISSN 2706-6525 (online), ISSN 2706-8285 (Print) SJESR ISSN 2706-9362 (CD-ROM), ISSN 2706-6525 (ISSN-L) Sir Syed Journal of Education & DOI: https://doi.org/10.36902/sjesr-vol3-iss4-2020(319-326) Social Research __________________________________________________________________________________ Abdul Sattar Edhi in Politics with Atypical Ideologies * Shafiq Ur Rehman, PhD Scholar ** Dr. Rizwan Ullah Kokab, Associate Professor / Chairman (Corresponding Author) __________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract Few people know that Abdul Sattar Edhi, the renowned social worker, also tried his luck in the political field. This study draws attention to his activities in the political field. It uncovers the political style and ideologies of this future leviathan in social work to find out why and how a genuine social worker could not get a proper place in politics and did not succeed in winning the votes and support of people. Along with the analysis of his electoral contests, his political ideology has also been highlighted in this study. To arrive at its findings the study evaluates the primary as well as secondary sources employing historical methods of research. Multiple sources of primary data like the interviews, biographies, and authentic press reports helped in the formation of the needed evidence for the empirical historical research in this study. It is finally construed that Edhi’s thoughts and style of work in politics did not match with the prevailing political atmosphere and behavior. His realistic approach could not attract a following in the political field where attachment of religious sentiments with politics and deceptive slogans of political characters did not leave any space for a real social worker to succeed.
    [Show full text]