DOCSLIB.ORG

Antarctic Treaty Insp 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Antarctic Treaty Insp 2005 ANTARCTIC TREATY INSPECTIONS 2005 Report of Antarctic Treaty Inspections undertaken jointly by the United Kingdom, Australia and Perú in accordance with Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty and Article 14 of the Environmental Protocol. Foreign and Commonwealth Office, London, UK Australian Antarctic Division, Kingston, Tasmania, Australia Instituto Antártico Peruano, Lima, Peru ANTARCTIC TREATY INSPECTIONS 2005. Report of Antarctic Treaty Inspections undertaken jointly by the United Kingdom, Australia and Peru in accordance with Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty and Article 14 of the Environmental Protocol. Contents Page Number Introduction 3-5 Acknowledgements 8 General Remarks and Conclusions 9 Major Recommendations 14 Stations 1. Vice Comodoro Marambio Argentina 16 2. Petrel Argentina 24 3. Esperanza Argentina 28 4. Comandante Ferraz Brazil 34 5. King Sejong Republic of Korea 40 6. Bellingshausen Russian Federation 46 7. Great Wall Peoples Republic 54 of China 8. St Kliment Ochridski Bulgaria 61 9. Juan Carlos I Spain 66 10. Gabriel de Castilla Spain 71 11. Base Decepción Argentina 77 12. Akademik Vernadsky Ukraine 82 13. Rothera Research Station United Kingdom 88 14. San Martin Argentina 94 Unoccupied Stations 15. T/N Ruperto Elichiribehety Uruguay 98 16. Pedro Vicente Maldonado Ecuador 99 17. Capitán Arturo Prat Chile 100 18. Risopatron Chile 102 19. Almirante Brown Argentina 103 20. Presidente Gabriel Gonzalez Videla Chile 104 21. Yelcho Chile 105 22. Teniente Luis Carvajal Villaroel Chile 106 Station Under Construction 23. Unnamed Czech Station Czech Republic 107 (James Ross Island) 1 Contents Page Number Historic Sites and Monuments 24. ‘Base A’, Port Lockroy United Kingdom 109 25. ‘Base F, (Wordie House), Winter Island United Kingdom 112 26. ‘Base Y’, Horseshoe Island United Kingdom 113 27. Stonington East Base United States of 115 America 28. ‘Base E’, Stonington Island United Kingdom 116 Vessels 29. M/V Professor Molchanov Russian Federation 117 Visits and Miscellaneous 30. Eco-Nelson Private (Czech 121 national) 31. Yachts 123 32. Presidente Eduardo Frei Chile 125 Appendix 1 Responses received 127 Cover picture: View of the Osterrieth Range, Gerlache Strait 2 ANTARCTIC TREATY INSPECTIONS 2005. Report of Antarctic Treaty Inspections undertaken jointly by the United Kingdom, Australia and Peru in accordance with Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty and Article 14 of the Environmental Protocol. Introduction Inspections were conducted jointly during February and March, 2005 by the United Kingdom, Australia and Peru in the Antarctic Peninsula region. The Inspections were undertaken by Observers designated by their respective governments in accordance with the notification procedures of Article VII (1) of the Antarctic Treaty. Observers so designated were: For the United Kingdom: • Dr. M.G. Richardson (MR), Head of the Polar Regions Unit, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, London. • Mr. R.H. Downie (RD), Environmental Manager, British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge. For Australia: • Mr. T. R. Maggs (TM), Environmental Manager, Australian Antarctic Division, Kingston, Tasmania. For Peru: • Mr. J.C. Rivera (JR), Environmental Officer, Instituto Antártico Peruano. The logistic platform for the Inspection Programme was provided by the United Kingdom’s Ice Patrol Vessel HMS Endurance. Most Inspections were made using the ship’s two Lynx helicopters, with a few exceptions which were made by small boat. Helicopter support allowed for flexible and speedy logistics without which far fewer Inspections would have been possible in the time available. The core Inspection Team consisted of Richardson, Downie, Maggs and Rivera. In addition, some Inspections were augmented, on a rotational basis, by Officers from HMS Endurance who had also been designated as Observers through diplomatic channels. The identity of the core Observers involved in particular Inspections is indicated at the end of each report by their initials. 3 The Inspection Team on the flight deck of HMS Endurance with a RN Lynx Helicopter. From left to right: Tom Maggs, Rod Downie, Mike Richardson, Lt Simon Collins, RN, Lt Mark Jameson, RN, Juan Carlos Rivera. The Inspections, undertaken between 10 February and 9 March, consisted of nine permanent (year-round) stations, five summer-only stations, three unoccupied stations, one station under construction, five Historic Sites and Monuments and one tourist vessel. In addition, five further unoccupied stations were overflown by helicopter but not actually visited. This was due to the large numbers of penguins or Fur Seals present in and around the stations concerned - landing a helicopter in the vicinity would have caused unacceptable disturbance to wildlife and would have been in contravention of Annex II to the Environmental Protocol. Stations which were unoccupied at the time of visits are dealt with separately in this Report. In total, the stations or facilities of 13 Consultative Parties and one non-Consultative Party were inspected during this programme. Brief visits were also made to the non-governmental ‘Eco-Nelson’ on Nelson Island, South Shetland Islands, and the Australian-flagged yacht Australis whilst at anchor in Port Lockroy. Comments on these visits are included within this Report. Because of their brief duration and informal nature these visits should not be considered as Inspections. To ensure impartiality, UK-designated Observers did not take part in the Inspections of operational UK stations or Historic Site and Monument No. 61 (‘Base A’, Port Lockroy), nor in the writing of the respective Inspection Reports. UK-designated Observers were however involved in the Inspections of unmanned Historic Sites and Monuments No. 62 (‘Base F’, (Wordie House), Argentine Islands), No. 63 (‘Base Y’ Horseshoe Island) and 4 No. 64 (‘Base E’, Stonington Island). All Inspections were undertaken in accordance with Article VII of the Antarctic Treaty and Article 14 of the Environmental Protocol. In line with Article 14(4) of the Protocol, reports of all Inspections undertaken were forwarded to the Treaty Parties concerned for comment. Where responses from Parties were of a minor drafting nature the proposed changes were incorporated in the relevant report. Responses of a more substantial nature are included within this report at Appendix 1. The report of the Inspection of the tourist vessel was also sent to the respective tourist operator and IAATO as well as the flag-State. 5 Itinerary HMS Endurance departed Mare Harbour, Falkland Islands on 8 February. Thereafter, the dates of Inspections were: Date (2005) Station/facility/vessel Country Status1 10 February Comandante Ferraz Brazil P 11 February Esperanza Argentina P 11 February T/N Ruperto Elichiribehety Uruguay UO 14 February King Sejong Republic of Korea P 15 February Great Wall Peoples Republic of P China 16 February Bellingshausen Russian Federation P ‘Eco-Nelson’ Non-governmental 17 February Capitán Arturo Prat Chile UO Pedro Vicente Maldonado Ecuador UO Risopatron Chile UO 20 February Gabriel de Castilla Spain SO Base Decepción Argentina SO 21 February Juan Carlos I Spain SO St. Kliment Ochridiski Bulgaria SO 25 February Petrel Argentina SO Vice Comodoro Marambio Argentina P 26 February Unnamed Czech Station, Czech Republic UC James Ross Island 27 February MV Professor Molchanov Russian Ferderation V 28 February Yelcho Chile UO Almirante Brown Argentina UO Gabriel Gonzalez Videla Chile UO Base A, Port Lockroy UK HSM 1 March Akademik Vernadsky Ukraine P ‘Base F’ (Wordie House) Winter UK HSM Island 3 March Teniente Luis Carvajal Villaroel Chile UO San Martin Argentina P ‘Base E’, Stonington UK HSM Stonington- East Base USA HSM 4 March ‘Base Y’, Horseshoe Island UK HSM 5 March Rothera Research Station UK P 1Key: P Permanent (year-round) station SO Summer-only station UO Unoccupied station UC Station under construction HSM Historic Site and Monument VVessel 6 7 All Inspections were undertaken using the Inspection Checklists adopted by the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, viz: Checklist “A” for permanent and summer-only stations (agreed in 1994, ATCM XVIII) Checklist “B” for vessels within the Antarctic Treaty Area, and Checklist “C” for abandoned stations and associated installations. These checklists were adopted through Resolution 5 (1995) at ATCM XIX. The checklists were used as an aide-memoire whilst undertaking Inspections rather than as exhaustive questionnaires. However, to ensure that the information collected on each station was recorded in a consistent fashion, a definitive checklist was completed immediately following each Inspection using the notes compiled by each Observer. These completed checklists have been retained for archival purposes. Prior to undertaking any Inspections, the credentials of the designated Observers were shown to the Station Leader (or in the case of the vessel inspected to the Expedition Leader and Master), and copies of such designations were provided. The Inspection Team was based onboard HMS Endurance throughout the duration of the programme, and disembarked at the UK’s Rothera Research Station on 4 March. From there the Team flew back direct to Punta Arenas, Chile on 8 March. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Without exception, the Inspection Team was afforded unlimited access to all facilities of each station and the Team would like to extend its sincere gratitude to the Station Leaders and staff who provided invaluable assistance and very generous hospitality – often at short notice. These Inspections would not have been possible without
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SUB-COMMITTEE on SHIP DESIGN and EQUIPMENT 54Th Session
    E SUB-COMMITTEE ON SHIP DESIGN AND DE 54/INF.2 EQUIPMENT 14 June 2010 54th session ENGLISH ONLY Agenda item 13 DEVELOPMENT OF A MANDATORY CODE FOR SHIPS OPERATING IN POLAR WATERS A tiered risk assessment approach to polar operations safety and the mandatory Polar Code Submitted by CLIA SUMMARY Executive summary: As a consultant to CLIA on the matter of Polar safety and operations, the International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators (IAATO) commissioned Safety at Sea Ltd. (SaS) to undertake an initial risk assessment study of SOLAS passenger vessels operating in Antarctic waters. This preliminary study is aimed at supporting passenger ship operators in the development of a Tiered Risk Assessment approach that can be used in the development and application of a mandatory Polar Code and/or as a framework for voyage planning and risk assessment. Strategic direction: 5.2 High-level action: 5.2.1 Planned output: 5.2.1.2 Action to be taken: Paragraph 8 Related document: DE 53/26, section 18 Background 1 The Sub-Committee will recall that CLIA and the International Association of Antarctic Tour Operators (IAATO) presented an overview of a tiered risk assessment approach to a polar operations safety and the mandatory Polar Code at DE 53. CLIA was asked to kindly make the full report of the study available upon its completion. 2 The Risk Assessment Study, prepared by Safety At Sea Ltd. has been finalized and is attached for consideration. I:\DE\54\INF-2.doc DE 54/INF.2 Page 2 Overview 3 The study consisted of a review of: current activities of passenger ship-based tourism within the Antarctic (IAATO context); the work of the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting Intersessional Contact Group (ATCM ICG) on issues concerning passenger ships operating in Antarctic waters; as well as documents and discussion pertaining to the development and adoption of Guidelines for Ships Operating in Polar Waters by the International Maritime Organization (IMO).
    [Show full text]
  • Antarctic Peninsula
    Hucke-Gaete, R, Torres, D. & Vallejos, V. 1997c. Entanglement of Antarctic fur seals, Arctocephalus gazella, by marine debris at Cape Shirreff and San Telmo Islets, Livingston Island, Antarctica: 1998-1997. Serie Científica Instituto Antártico Chileno 47: 123-135. Hucke-Gaete, R., Osman, L.P., Moreno, C.A. & Torres, D. 2004. Examining natural population growth from near extinction: the case of the Antarctic fur seal at the South Shetlands, Antarctica. Polar Biology 27 (5): 304–311 Huckstadt, L., Costa, D. P., McDonald, B. I., Tremblay, Y., Crocker, D. E., Goebel, M. E. & Fedak, M. E. 2006. Habitat Selection and Foraging Behavior of Southern Elephant Seals in the Western Antarctic Peninsula. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2006, abstract #OS33A-1684. INACH (Instituto Antártico Chileno) 2010. Chilean Antarctic Program of Scientific Research 2009-2010. Chilean Antarctic Institute Research Projects Department. Santiago, Chile. Kawaguchi, S., Nicol, S., Taki, K. & Naganobu, M. 2006. Fishing ground selection in the Antarctic krill fishery: Trends in patterns across years, seasons and nations. CCAMLR Science, 13: 117–141. Krause, D. J., Goebel, M. E., Marshall, G. J., & Abernathy, K. (2015). Novel foraging strategies observed in a growing leopard seal (Hydrurga leptonyx) population at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Animal Biotelemetry, 3:24. Krause, D.J., Goebel, M.E., Marshall. G.J. & Abernathy, K. In Press. Summer diving and haul-out behavior of leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) near mesopredator breeding colonies at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Marine Mammal Science.Leppe, M., Fernandoy, F., Palma-Heldt, S. & Moisan, P 2004. Flora mesozoica en los depósitos morrénicos de cabo Shirreff, isla Livingston, Shetland del Sur, Península Antártica, in Actas del 10º Congreso Geológico Chileno.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POLAR RECORD Editor: L
    THE POLAR RECORD Editor: L. M. Forbes. Editorial Committee: B. B. Roberts, G. de Q. Robin, Sir J. M. Wordie Vol. 9 January 1959 No. 61 CONTENTS The Scott Polar Research Institute page 297 ARTICLES : The Canadian Northern Insect Survey, 1947-57. By T. N. Freeman 299 Recent economic developments in northern Quebec and Labrador. By J. Brian Bird . 308 Iron ore in Arctic Europe. By P. A. B. Gethin .... 314 Geodetic survey of northern Canada by shoran trilateration. By Angus C. Hamilton 320 The manuscript collection of the Scott Polar Research Institute. By Ann Savours .......... 331 FIELD WORK: British expedition to Vestspitsbergen, 1956 . • . 336 French expedition to central Greenland, 1956-57 .... 336 British expedition to north-west Greenland, 1957 .... 336 Soviet Arctic expeditions, 1957 337 The Northern Sea Route in 1957 337 Swedish-Finnish-Swiss International Geophysical Year Expedition to Nordaustlandet, 1957-58; and Swedish Expedition to Nordaust- landet, 1958-59: Season 1957-58. ...... 338 Swedish Glaciological Expedition to Nordaustlandet, 1958 . 339 Under-ice crossing of the Arctic basin: U.S.S. Nautilus and U.S.S. Skate, 1958 340 . Arctic Institute Greenland Expedition, 1958 341 British naval hydrographic surveys in the Falkland Islands Depen- dencies, 1956-57 and 1957-58 '. 341 The Australian automatic weather station on Lewis Islet, Wilkes Land 342 Anglo-American physiological team in Ross Dependency, 1957-58 . 343 NOTES : Extension of International Geophysical Year activities into 1959 . 345 Norwegian-Soviet sealing agreement, 1958 ..... 845 Tenth meeting of the International Whaling Commission, 1958 . 349 New Soviet ice-strengthened ships 350 New geographical institute in Siberia 350 ig Pit 296 CONTENTS NOTES (cont.) Soviet organizations concerned with the Antarctic .
    [Show full text]
  • Station Sharing in Antarctica
    IP 94 Agenda Item: ATCM 7, ATCM 10, ATCM 11, ATCM 14, CEP 5, CEP 6b, CEP 9 Presented by: ASOC Original: English Station Sharing in Antarctica 1 IP 94 Station Sharing in Antarctica Information Paper Submitted by ASOC to the XXIX ATCM (CEP Agenda Items 5, 6 and 9, ATCM Agenda Items 7, 10, 11 and 14) I. Introduction and overview As of 2005 there were at least 45 permanent stations in the Antarctic being operated by 18 countries, of which 37 were used as year-round stations.i Although there are a few examples of states sharing scientific facilities (see Appendix 1), for the most part the practice of individual states building and operating their own facilities, under their own flags, persists. This seems to be rooted in the idea that in order to become a full Antarctic Treaty Consultative Party (ATCP), one has to build a station to show seriousness of scientific purpose, although formally the ATCPs have clarified that this is not the case. The scientific mission and international scientific cooperation is nominally at the heart of the ATS,ii and through SCAR the region has a long-established scientific coordination body. It therefore seems surprising that half a century after the adoption of this remarkable Antarctic regime, we still see no truly international stations. The ‘national sovereign approach’ continues to be the principal driver of new stations. Because new stations are likely to involve relatively large impacts in areas that most likely to be near pristine, ASOC submits that this approach should be changed. In considering environmental impact analyses of proposed new station construction, the Committee on Environmental Protection (CEP) presently does not have a mandate to take into account opportunities for sharing facilities (as an alternative that would reduce impacts).
    [Show full text]
  • Nsf.Gov OPP: Report of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MORE AND BETTER SCIENCE IN ANTARCTICA THROUGH INCREASED A LOGISTICAL EFFECTIVENESS Report of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel Washington, D.C. July 23, 2012 This booklet summarizes the report of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel, More and Better Science in Antarctica Through Increased Logistical Effectiveness. The report was completed at the request of the White House office of science and Technology Policy and the National Science Foundation. Copies of the full report may be obtained from David Friscic at [email protected] (phone: 703-292-8030). An electronic copy of the report may be downloaded from http://www.nsf.gov/ od/opp/usap_special_review/usap_brp/rpt/index.jsp. Cover art by Zina Deretsky. Front and back inside covers showing McMurdo’s Dry Valleys in Antarctica provided by Craig Dorman. CONTENTS Introduction ............................................ 1 The Panel ............................................... 2 Overall Assessment ................................. 3 U.S. Facilities in Antarctica ....................... 4 The Environmental Challenge .................... 7 Uncertainties in Logistics Planning ............. 8 Activities of Other Nations ....................... 9 Economic Considerations ....................... 10 Major Issues ......................................... 11 Single-Point Failure Modes ..................... 17 Recommendations ................................. 18 Concluding Observations ....................... 21 U.S. ANTARCTIC PROGRAM BLUE RIBBON PANEL WASHINGTON,
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators 2008-2009
    IP 33 rev. 2 Agenda Item: ATCM 4, ATCM 11 Presented by: IAATO Original: English Report of the International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators 2008-2009 1 IP 33 rev. 2 Report of the International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators 2008-2009 Under Article III (2) of the Antarctic Treaty Introduction The International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators (IAATO) is pleased to present a report of its activities to ATCM XXXII in Baltimore, Maryland, USA from April 6-17, 2009, in relation to Article III (2) of the Antarctic Treaty. IAATO is a member organization founded by seven companies in 1991 to advocate, promote and practice safe and environmentally responsible private-sector travel to the Antarctic. During the 2008-2009 fiscal year, IAATO maintained its total membership level at 108 companies and organizations. A Membership Directory, regularly updated, can be found on line at www.iaato.org. As an organization, IAATO provides an online and central office resource for its members. Comprehensive operational guidelines and procedures are stored in the Members Only section of the website for reference, research purposes and downloading by its members (www.iaato.org). Regular updates and information are shared with members throughout the year, both in the field and home offices. The aim is to encourage the highest possible operating standards for IAATO companies by providing them with the information needed for a safe and environmentally responsible operation. Coinciding with the start of the new 2008-2009 fiscal year, a new Executive Director was appointed to manage the IAATO Secretariat. IAATO Secretariat offices were relocated in July 2008 to 179 Wayland Avenue in Providence, Rhode Island, USA, and a full-time office manager was hired.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes of Wilkins Ice Shelf Over the Past 15 Years and Inferences on Its Stability M
    Changes of Wilkins Ice Shelf over the past 15 years and inferences on its stability M. Braun, A. Humbert, A. Moll To cite this version: M. Braun, A. Humbert, A. Moll. Changes of Wilkins Ice Shelf over the past 15 years and inferences on its stability. The Cryosphere Discussions, Copernicus, 2008, 2 (3), pp.341-382. hal-00298543 HAL Id: hal-00298543 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00298543 Submitted on 23 May 2008 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Cryosphere Discuss., 2, 341–382, 2008 The Cryosphere www.the-cryosphere-discuss.net/2/341/2008/ Discussions TCD © Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed under 2, 341–382, 2008 the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. The Cryosphere Discussions is the access reviewed discussion forum of The Cryosphere Changes of Wilkins Ice Shelf M. Braun et al. Title Page Changes of Wilkins Ice Shelf over the past Abstract Introduction 15 years and inferences on its stability Conclusions References Tables Figures M. Braun1, A. Humbert2, and A. Moll1 ◭ ◮ 1Center for Remote Sensing of Land Surfaces (ZFL), University of Bonn, Germany 2Institute for Geophysics, University of Muenster, Germany ◭ ◮ Received: 15 April 2008 – Accepted: 6 May 2008 – Published: 23 May 2008 Back Close Correspondence to: M.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Advance Exchange of Operational Information, 2005-2006
    Advance Exchange of Operational Information on Antarctic Activities for the 2005–2006 season United States Antarctic Program Office of Polar Programs National Science Foundation Advance Exchange of Operational Information on Antarctic Activities for 2005/2006 Season Country: UNITED STATES Date Submitted: October 2005 SECTION 1 SHIP OPERATIONS Commercial charter KRASIN Nov. 21, 2005 Depart Vladivostok, Russia Dec. 12-14, 2005 Port Call Lyttleton N.Z. Dec. 17 Arrive 60S Break channel and escort TERN and Tanker Feb. 5, 2006 Depart 60S in route to Vladivostok U.S. Coast Guard Breaker POLAR STAR The POLAR STAR will be in back-up support for icebreaking services if needed. M/V AMERICAN TERN Jan. 15-17, 2006 Port Call Lyttleton, NZ Jan. 24, 2006 Arrive Ice edge, McMurdo Sound Jan 25-Feb 1, 2006 At ice pier, McMurdo Sound Feb 2, 2006 Depart McMurdo Feb 13-15, 2006 Port Call Lyttleton, NZ T-5 Tanker, (One of five possible vessels. Specific name of vessel to be determined) Jan. 14, 2006 Arrive Ice Edge, McMurdo Sound Jan. 15-19, 2006 At Ice Pier, McMurdo. Re-fuel Station Jan. 19, 2006 Depart McMurdo R/V LAURENCE M. GOULD For detailed and updated schedule, log on to: http://www.polar.org/science/marine/sched_history/lmg/lmgsched.pdf R/V NATHANIEL B. PALMER For detailed and updated schedule, log on to: http://www.polar.org/science/marine/sched_history/nbp/nbpsched.pdf SECTION 2 AIR OPERATIONS Information on planned air operations (see attached sheets) SECTION 3 STATIONS a) New stations or refuges not previously notified: NONE b) Stations closed or refuges abandoned and not previously notified: NONE SECTION 4 LOGISTICS ACTIVITIES AFFECTING OTHER NATIONS a) McMurdo airstrip will be used by Italian and New Zealand C-130s and Italian Twin Otters b) McMurdo Heliport will be used by New Zealand and Italian helicopters c) Extensive air, sea and land logistic cooperative support with New Zealand d) Twin Otters to pass through Rothera (UK) upon arrival and departure from Antarctica e) Italian Twin Otter will likely pass through South Pole and McMurdo.
    [Show full text]
  • HMS ENDURANCE 1974/75 SEASON 52 Bags Despatched Total Weight 800 Lb
    The Greenies continued to work on the computer snag. Only to find the test equipment they were using also suspect. However, the computer itself was changed and with the able assistance of Sam Sampson and Roger Wiltshire, who did all the mechanical linkage adjustments, while, I might add, the aircraft was "burning and turning". We would all like to think that that was it, but the aircraft still has it's moments when it just doesn't want to start properly. By Monday 13 Jan we had completed the somewhat rough crossing of Drakes passage, and had arrived off Nelson Island in the South Shetlands, where we flew both the aircraft to land yet another large survey camp party with all their various pieces of equipment. With weather permitting we continued our vertical photography work and as we were down the Gerlache Straits and the Bismark Straits, the aircraft were used to take members of the ship's company, who were keen enough, to take photographs of the scenic beauty. One of the odd occasions when the Flight weren't actually busy flying and when recreational leave was given, was when the ship had sailed into the Bay of Deception Island and dropped anchor. The keen photographers and sightseers were soon ashore there. The aircraft were also used when the Captain had to go ashore to visit the Russian and Chilian camps that are also on Nelson Island. The following day, Monday 20 Jan the aircraft were involved in a mercy mission flying our doctor Surgeon Lt "Donkey" Bray to USS HERO, a small vessel belonging to the American Survey people, which we had seen while visiting Palmer base.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release – 25Th February 2008
    National Science and Engineering Week National Science and Engineering Week 7-16 March 2008 (formerly National Science Week) is an opportunity for people of all ages, areas and organisations to take part in science, engineering and technology activities. HMS Endurance’s contribution to National Science Week will be available on www.visitandlearn.co.uk and www.port.ac.uk/thebigfreeze National Science and Engineering Week project supported by: Press Release – 25th February 2008 SCIENCE COMES TO LIFE WITH ROYAL NAVY ICE PATROL VESSEL HMS ENDURANCE Dame Ellen MacArthur, the Royal Navy and the University of Portsmouth are breathing new life into science lessons for seven - 11 year olds. Dame Ellen MacArthur and the Royal Navy have joined forces with the University of Portsmouth to create an exciting and new educational partnership, which will be launched in time to support National Science and Engineering Week in March. Pupils will find their science lessons being brought to life by a series of easy to use downloadable worksheets that will allow them to build their own weather stations, create erupting volcanoes, and build and fly model albatrosses in the project named BIG FREEZE: SCIENCE FROM ANTARCTICA. Experienced in the oceanography, meteorology and climatology of Antarctica, the Royal Navy’s Ice Patrol Ship, HMS Endurance will be the focus of a series of National Curriculum supporting Key Stage 2 worksheets in partnership with the University of Portsmouth and supported by round-the-world yachtswoman, Dame Ellen MacArthur. The downloadable worksheets and lesson plans for 7 - 11 year olds will be available on the HMS Endurance Tracking Project www.visitandlearn.co.uk and on the University of Portsmouth’s website www.port.ac.uk/thebigfreeze from Thursday 28th February.
    [Show full text]
  • JCS Newsletter -Issue 24 – Summer 2018
    JCS 2018(EM) .qxp_Layout 2 03/08/2018 3:30pm Page 1 The James Caird Society Newsletter Issue 24 · Summer 2018 A working day in the life of the James Caird The James Caird name continues life on the high seas and is still busy at work down in the the Antarctic, and in other spots around the world. Find out more on Page 4. Registered Charity No. 1044864 JCS 2018(EM) .qxp_Layout 2 03/08/2018 3:30pm Page 2 James Caird Society news and events Pippa Hare retires … Friday 23 November After many years of loyal support to the James Caird Society, Pippa Hare The AGM will be held has decided to step down from her role as a Committee member. at 5.45pm in the Although the Committee is sad to lose her contribution, members would James Caird Hall like to celebrate her dedication, hard work and unerring loyalty to a vital at Dulwich College association that has done so much to maintain awareness of Shackleton’s The lecture will begin leadership. Pippa’s father, Harding Dunnett, was of course the driving at 7pm in the Great Hall. force behind the founding of the James Caird Society, and Pippa was always inspired by his example and determination to honour Shackleton, his people and their remarkable exploits. A debt of gratitude is owed to The speaker will be David L Mearns Oceanographer, author of The Pippa for taking on his mantle with such commitment, and all good Shipwreck Hunter and a specialist in wishes for her ‘retirement’. deep sea recoveries, with several high profile ship recoveries to his name The Society’s activities Dinner will be served afterwards The Society is a Charitable Organisation and its main expenses relate to its aim of preserving the memory of Sir Ernest through, for example, the Meetings in 2019 Newsletter, Journal and website.
    [Show full text]
  • Waba Directory 2003
    DIAMOND DX CLUB www.ddxc.net WABA DIRECTORY 2003 1 January 2003 DIAMOND DX CLUB WABA DIRECTORY 2003 ARGENTINA LU-01 Alférez de Navió José María Sobral Base (Army)1 Filchner Ice Shelf 81°04 S 40°31 W AN-016 LU-02 Almirante Brown Station (IAA)2 Coughtrey Peninsula, Paradise Harbour, 64°53 S 62°53 W AN-016 Danco Coast, Graham Land (West), Antarctic Peninsula LU-19 Byers Camp (IAA) Byers Peninsula, Livingston Island, South 62°39 S 61°00 W AN-010 Shetland Islands LU-04 Decepción Detachment (Navy)3 Primero de Mayo Bay, Port Foster, 62°59 S 60°43 W AN-010 Deception Island, South Shetland Islands LU-07 Ellsworth Station4 Filchner Ice Shelf 77°38 S 41°08 W AN-016 LU-06 Esperanza Base (Army)5 Seal Point, Hope Bay, Trinity Peninsula 63°24 S 56°59 W AN-016 (Antarctic Peninsula) LU- Francisco de Gurruchaga Refuge (Navy)6 Harmony Cove, Nelson Island, South 62°18 S 59°13 W AN-010 Shetland Islands LU-10 General Manuel Belgrano Base (Army)7 Filchner Ice Shelf 77°46 S 38°11 W AN-016 LU-08 General Manuel Belgrano II Base (Army)8 Bertrab Nunatak, Vahsel Bay, Luitpold 77°52 S 34°37 W AN-016 Coast, Coats Land LU-09 General Manuel Belgrano III Base (Army)9 Berkner Island, Filchner-Ronne Ice 77°34 S 45°59 W AN-014 Shelves LU-11 General San Martín Base (Army)10 Barry Island in Marguerite Bay, along 68°07 S 67°06 W AN-016 Fallières Coast of Graham Land (West), Antarctic Peninsula LU-21 Groussac Refuge (Navy)11 Petermann Island, off Graham Coast of 65°11 S 64°10 W AN-006 Graham Land (West); Antarctic Peninsula LU-05 Melchior Detachment (Navy)12 Isla Observatorio
    [Show full text]