DOCSLIB.ORG

7 Landscape and Visual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Penmanshiel Wind Farm RES 7 Landscape and Visual Introduction and Overview Strategic Landscape Planning Guidance 7.1 The Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) for wind farms forms one of the key components of the EIA process required by the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) 7.6 The site area is located within ‘Zone 1’ of Scottish Natural Heritage’s Strategic Guidance for Onshore (Scotland) Regulations 2011 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘EIA Regulations’). The results of the Wind Farms as it contains no national or local landscape designations and is not within the search area assessment allow consideration of the proposed development against the relevant local planning for wild land. The area is close to the Drone Hill Wind Farm which is currently under construction policies which seek to protect the landscape resource and visual amenity. This section has been and within close proximity of the Berwickshire Coastline AGLV. The assessment will be required to produced by Chartered Landscape Architects at AMEC Environment and Infrastructure Limited. examine potential landscape and visual effects in respect of this receptor. Zone 1 is defined as follows: 7.2 The objective of this assessment has been to determine the landscape and visual effects of the proposed development on the existing landscape resource and visual amenity. The following 7.7 ‘Lowest natural heritage sensitivity identifies areas at the broad scale with least sensitivity to wind landscape and visual receptors have been assessed: farms with the greatest opportunity for development, within which overall a large number of developments could be acceptable in natural heritage terms, so long as they are undertaken • landscape character, key characteristics, and elements; sensitively and with due regard to cumulative impact.’ • designated landscapes; and • views and visual amenity experienced by residents, tourists, visitors, recreational and road users. Supplementary Planning Guidance 7.3 The assessment process has encompassed the construction, operation, and decommissioning phases of 7.8 Specific guidance on wind energy development in the Scottish Borders is set out in the Supplementary the proposed wind farm and has included design iteration and re-assessment of the residual effects. Planning Guidance on Wind Energy (Scottish Borders Council, 2011). The SPG recognises that for most The design and assessment process has sought to achieve an acceptable compromise between wind farm proposals: maximising energy capture and achieving an acceptable design in terms of landscape and visual 7.9 ‘Landscape and visual impacts are usually significant and most wind farm proposals are likely to raise effects. cumulative landscape and visual impacts to some degree.’ 7.4 The assessment has also included cumulative assessment and considers the additional cumulative 7.10 The SPG goes on to identify areas of constraint for wind energy development. The Spatial Strategy for effect that would be generated by the proposed wind farm in combination with other existing, the Scottish Borders is ranked as follows: consented and proposed wind farms. The Drone Hill Wind Farm (consented and currently under • Area of Significant Protection; construction) has been assessed as though it is already existing and is illustrated as such in the • Moderate Constraints (Higher); visualisations and photomontages, where the Drone Hill Wind Farm has been photomontaged into the • Moderate Constraints (Lower); existing view. • Area of Search with Minor Constraints; and 7.5 The Chapter is structured as follows: • Area of Search. • Strategic Landscape Planning Guidance 7.11 The strategy indicates that the proposed wind farm is located within an area that is predominantly • Methodology ranked as Moderate Constraints (Higher), although turbines 14 and 15 are within Areas of Significant • Consultation and Scope of Assessment Protection and turbine 1 is within Area of Search with Minor Constraints (see figure 4.1 for turbine • Baseline Description numbers). The Areas of Significant Protection which overlap the peripheral parts of the site are likely • Mitigation Inherent in the Proposed Scheme to be those areas with theoretical visibility from the A1 and A1107, which are identified as visual • Viewpoint (VP) and ZTV Analysis receptors in the SPG report. • Residual Landscape Effects 7.12 The SPG also lists the Berwickshire Coastal Path from Dowlaw to Pease Bay (Core Path 2) as a receptor • Residual Visual Effects of significant strategic importance in this area. • Summary of and Evaluation of Residual Landscape and Visual Effects 7.13 This variation in potential landscape capacity and constraints for wind farm development is noted and • Conclusions the design process has taken due account of the landscape and visual receptors identified in the SPG • References as well as many others within the study area (Chapter 3: Design Evolution and Alternatives and paragraphs 7.71 to 7.97) . 7-1 Volume 2: Main Report Chapter 7: Landscape and Visual Penmanshiel Wind Farm RES Methodology • Cumulative landscape effects: where the addition of the proposed Penmanshiel Wind Farm would lead to an additional or cumulative landscape effect, in combination with one or more wind 7.14 The methodology for the LVIA has been undertaken in accordance with the methodology set out in farms. Appendix 7.1 . It conforms to the Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, Second 7.19 Visual effects are concerned wholly with the effect of development on views, and the general visual Edition (GLVIA, 2002). Additional guidance has been taken from the following publications: amenity. The visual effects are identified for different receptors (people) who would experience the • Siting and Design of Wind farms in the Landscape, Version 1 (Scottish Natural Heritage, 2009); view at their places of residence, during recreational activities, at work, or when travelling through • Visual Assessment of Wind Farms: Best Practice (University of Newcastle and Scottish Natural the area. The visual effects may include the following: Heritage, 2002); and • Visual effect: a change to an existing static view, sequential views, or wider visual amenity as a • Guidance for the Assessment of Cumulative Landscape and Visual Impacts Arising from Wind farm result of development. Developments – Version 2 (SNH Advisory Services, 2005). • Cumulative visual effects: the cumulative visibility of development change and in particular the • The SNH document Visual Representation of Wind Farms: Good Practice Guidance provides cumulative visibility of more than one wind farm, which may combine to have a cumulative visual guidance on the production of graphics, including Zones of Theoretical Visibility and effect. photomontages, for wind farm assessments. 7.20 Essentially the level of landscape and visual effect (and whether this is significant) is determined 7.15 In addition, the LVIA has made reference to a number of relevant planning documents including the through consideration of the ‘sensitivity’ of the landscape or visual receptor to the proposed Scottish Government’s web based Planning Advice Note (PAN) on Onshore Wind Turbines, previously development and the ‘magnitude of change’ caused by the proposed development, in this case the PAN 45 Renewable Energy Technologies, Scottish Planning Policy (SPP), and Scottish Borders Council construction of a wind farm and associated infrastructure; the operation of the wind farm for a period (SBC) Development Plan Policy, in particular Structure Plan policy D4 Renewable Energy Development of 25 years; and subsequent decommissioning. and Supplementary Planning Guidance on Wind Energy. 7.21 The process involves iterative design and re-assessment of any remaining, residual effects that could Defining the Study Area not otherwise be mitigated or ‘designed out’. Landscape or visual sensitivity specific to this development is ranked from high, medium, low to negligible (with negligible as the lowest or least 7.16 The SNH guidance advises that the Study Area for wind turbines of this height should be based on an sensitive) and the magnitude of change is ranked from high, medium, low, negligible to zero as area 30 km distance from each of the proposed turbine locations. The Study Area is illustrated in indicated in Table 7.1. The type of effect is also considered and may be direct or indirect, temporary Figure 7.1 and in order to achieve the SNH guidelines, covers a circular area of 30.925 km radius from (reversible) or permanent, cumulative, and positive, neutral, or negative. Where relevant, mostly in the site centre (minimum 30 km distance from each of the proposed turbine locations). relation to cumulative effects, the probability of an effect is also stated. 7.17 It is important to note that the boundary of the Study Area is not the limit of potential visibility in 7.22 The landscape and visual assessment unavoidably involves a combination of both quantitative and clear weather conditions. Rather it is an area defined by SNH, on the basis of research to determine a qualitative assessment and wherever possible has sought to gain a consensus of professional opinion suitable Study Area for the assessment of wind farms, which would contain all potential significant through consultation, peer review, and the adoption of a systematic, impartial, and professional landscape and visual effects. assessment approach. Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment 7.23 In accordance with the EIA Regulations, it is
Recommended publications
  • Scottish Borders Council Planning and Building Standards Committee

    Scottish Borders Council Planning and Building Standards Committee

    Item No. 4 SCOTTISH BORDERS COUNCIL PLANNING AND BUILDING STANDARDS COMMITTEE MINUTE of MEETING of the PLANNING AND BUILDING STANDARDS COMMITTEE held in the Council Headquarters, Newtown St. Boswells on 9 December 2013 at 10a.m. ------------------ Present: - Councillors R. Smith (Chairman), M. Ballantyne, S. Bell, J. Brown, J. Fullarton, I. Gillespie, D. Moffat, S. Mountford, B. White. In Attendance:- Development Standards Manager, Major Applications, Review and Enforcement Manager (paras 1-4), Senior Roads Planning Officers, Managing Solicitor – Commercial Services, Democratic Services Team Leader, Democratic Services Officer (F. Henderson). WELCOME 1. The Chairman welcomed everyone to the meeting and drew their attention to the displays which featured the Winners of the Scottish Borders Design Awards 2013. The Chairman explained that the award scheme was first established in 1984 and ran every two years. The Scheme was organised by the Built and Natural Heritage team from Planning and Regulatory Services and sought to recognise and publicise examples of good building design, educate and inspire all those involved in new developments and raise the overall standards of building design. A total of 30 entries were received across the various categories of building type and judged by an independent judging panel chaired by Ian Lindley with David Suttie representing the Royal Town Planning Institute Scotland (RTPI) and John Lane representing the Royal Incorporation of Architects in Scotland (RIAS). The Chairman congratulated Mark Douglas and Andy Millar for their work in promoting and running the awards. DECISION NOTED. ORDER OF BUSINESS 2. The Chairman varied the order of business as shown on the agenda and the Minute reflects the order in which the items were considered at the meeting.
  • What More Can Be Done to Encourage People to Change Their Travelling

    What More Can Be Done to Encourage People to Change Their Travelling

    WRITTEN SUBMISSION FROM ALASTAIR MORRISON This is in response to the Call for Views on Walking and Cycling in Scotland. I am both a walker and a cyclist, but I find that provision for active travel on foot is generally adequate, whereas I meet many difficulties when I try to cycle instead of going by car, so I will confine my comments to cycling. Since retiring in 2001, moving to a new part of Scotland, and attempting to return to my youthful preference for cycling, I have felt justified on several occasions to write to the authorities about difficulties I have met. As your deadline is close, I thought the most effective way to respond would be enclose extracts from these letters. This means that I am not responding specifically to the 6 questions in your Call, but the letters mainly relate to questions 3, 4 and 5. Basically the letters describe difficulties which people meet when they try travelling by cycle, and which will presumably discourage anyone who lacks experience or confidence from trying a second time. I leave it to you to draw general principles from the specific examples of problems described in these letters. For brevity I have omitted parts of all the letters and, assuming that this submission may be made publicly available, I have also omitted names and full addresses. Yours sincerely, Alastair Morrison. Letter 1. Sainsbury’s Cycle Park. To: Sainsbury's Dear Sir, My home is roughly equidistant from Tesco and Sainsbury's. I sometimes use my bicycle (equipped with paniers) for shopping.
  • Dunlaverock House Coldingham Sands, Eyemouth, Berwickshire Dunlaverock House Corridor to the Kitchen

    Dunlaverock House Coldingham Sands, Eyemouth, Berwickshire Dunlaverock House Corridor to the Kitchen

    Dunlaverock House Coldingham Sands, Eyemouth, Berwickshire Dunlaverock House corridor to the kitchen. The formal dining room has ample space and can comfortably sit 20. Both Coldingham Sands, Eyemouth, the drawing room and dining room are enhanced Berwickshire TD14 5PA by many original features, including decorative plasterwork cornicing and open fireplaces. The kitchen has a range of appliances including a A magnificent, coastal property double sink, hand wash sink, a gas cooker and with stunning views across hob, integrated electric ovens, space for a large fridge freezer. It opens into a breakfast room, Coldingham Bay currently used as an office, that could be used for dining or as an informal sitting room and has Coldingham 1 mile, Eyemouth 4 miles, Berwick- a multi-fuel stove. The service corridor gives upon-Tweed 12.7 miles, Edinburgh 47 miles access to the back door, boiler room, larder, utility room and to the owner’s accommodation. The Ground floor: Vestibule | Hall | Drawing room owner’s accommodation consists of a snug/office Dining room | Kitchen/Breakfast room with French windows, and a WC. There is also Boiler room | Larder | 2 WCs | Utility room a secondary set of stairs, affording the owners Double bedroom with en suite shower room privacy, leading to a double bedroom with an en First floor: 4 Double bedrooms with en suite suite shower room to the rear of the property. bathroom The first floor is approached by a beautiful, Second floor: Shower room | 2 Double bedrooms sweeping staircase lit by a part stained, glass window. From here the landing gives access to Owner’s accommodation: 1 Double bedrooms four double bedrooms with en suite bathrooms, with en suite shower room | Snug/office two of which benefit from stunning sea views.
  • Updating and Screening Assessment 2012

    Updating and Screening Assessment 2012

    2012 Air Quality Updating and Screening Assessment for Scottish Borders Council In fulfillment of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 Local Air Quality Management April 2012 Scottish Borders Council Local Authority David A Brown Officer Department Environment & Infrastructure Council Offices, Rosetta Road, Peebles, Address EH45 8HG Telephone 01721 726 358 ext 6462 e-mail [email protected] Report Reference SBC/USA/2011/1 number Date May 2012 Scottish Borders Council USA 2012 1 Scottish Borders Council Executive Summary Scottish Borders Council undertakes a program of Air Quality Assessment in accordance with the Guidance produced by the UK Government and Devolved Administrations. Reports are produced annually on a rolling program. Earlier rounds of review and assessment have shown that the main industrial pollutants are unlikely to exceed the UK Air Quality Objectives at any location within the Council’s area. And that only NO2 from road traffic and PM10 from domestic fuel consumption still required to be considered. A Detailed Assessment of PM10 levels was subsequently undertaken at a location agreed with the Scottish Government and Scottish Environmental Protection Agency as a worst possible case. This work has shown that no part of the Councils area was at risk of exceeding the Air Quality Objective for PM10. As part of the air quality monitoring programme, the Council monitored nitrogen dioxide (NO2) using diffusion tubes at 19 different locations. The monitoring of NO2 has shown no exceedences of the NO2 Objectives, with levels on average decreasing annually. In 2010 the number of sites was reduced to 14 with the background sites at Peebles, Kelso and Melrose being discontinued.
  • Item No 5 (A) Planning and Building

    Item No 5 (A) Planning and Building

    Item No 5 (a) SCOTTISH BORDERS COUNCIL PLANNING AND BUILDING STANDARDS COMMITTEE 3 SEPTEMBER 2012 APPLICATION FOR PLANNING PERMISSION ITEM: REFERENCE NUMBER: 11/00888/FUL OFFICER: Carlos Clarke WARD: Leaderdale and Melrose PROPOSAL: Erection of 9 No wind turbines 126.5m high to tip and associated infrastructure including hardstandings, anemometer mast, control building, temporary construction compound, laydown area, access tracks, electrical connections and borrow pit SITE: Land South West Of Hyndsidehill Farmhouse (Corsbie Moor), Westruther APPLICANT: E.ON Climate & Renewables UK Developments Limited AGENT: None SITE DESCRIPTION The site is located on agricultural land north-east of Legerwood, alongside the A6089 to its north-east. It is located approximately 4.5k south-east of lauder and 4k north west of Gordon. The site comprises a mixture of cultivated arable land and pastureland, with medium to large agricultural fields, many enclosed by hedgerows, including trees and blocks of woodland. It extends from the A6089 to the north-east down to a minor public road to the south-west. It bounds agricultural land on its north-westerly and southerly sides, with Stell Wood to the north-west, Lodgehill Wood to the south, and Pickie Moss to the south-west. The nearest residential properties are located to the north east, Brownshall Lodge and Langrigs, situated on the opposite side of the A6089. Residential groupings are located to the south at Corsbie, Kirkhill and Legerwood, with groupings at Boon and Dods to the north-west and north. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT This application originally sought planning consent for the erection of 12 no. 126.5m high wind turbines (2.3MW each), along with associated infrastructure including hardstandings, anemometer mast, substation building, construction compound and laydown area, access tracks, underground electricity connections and borrow pit.
  • Shawbraes Is a Category B Listed Building. This Is Defined As

    Shawbraes Is a Category B Listed Building. This Is Defined As

    !e H"tory of Shawbrae Farm A. The Farmhouse Building (1) Shawbraes is a Category B listed building. This is defined as: Category B Buildings of regional or more than local importance, or major examples of some particular period, style or building type which may have been altered. (2) On the British Listed Buildings website, the following description is given: Shawbraes Farmhouse Including Garden Walls, Coldingham Name: Shawbraes Farmhouse Including Garden Walls Category: B Date Listed: 26 January 2000 Historic Scotland Building ID: 46664 OS Grid Coordinates: 386414, 662439 Latitude/Longitude: 55.8550, -2.2186 Location: Coldingham, The Scottish Borders TD14 5LE Locality: Coldingham County: Scottish Borders Country: Scotland Postcode: TD14 5LE Description: 18th century in origin with later additions and alterations. Symmetrical 2-storey, 5-bay, rectangular- plan farmhouse with taller addition at rear forming near L-plan; single storey, single bay wing to outer right; later single storey, 3-bay wing recessed to outer left. Harl-pointed sandstone and whinstone rubble; cream sandstone dressings; dry-dashed wing to outer left. Droved quoins and long and short surrounds to openings in part; ashlar margins; projecting cills throughout. S (ENTRANCE) ELEVATION: main block with timber panelled door centred at ground; 2-pane letterbox fanlight; single window aligned at 1st floor; single windows at both floors in remaining bays to left and right. Single window in single storey wing to outer right. Single windows in 3-bay wing recessed to outer left. E (SIDE) ELEVATION: single storey projection to left with single windows in both bays; principal block set behind with small attic light off-set to left of centre.
  • Flood Risk Management Strategy Forth Estuary Local Plan

    Flood Risk Management Strategy Forth Estuary Local Plan

    Flood Risk Management Strategy Forth Estuary Local Plan District This section provides supplementary information on the characteristics and impacts of river, coastal and surface water flooding. Future impacts due to climate change, the potential for natural flood management and links to river basin management are also described within these chapters. Detailed information about the objectives and actions to manage flooding are provided in Section 2. Section 3: Supporting information 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 379 3.2 River flooding ......................................................................................... 380 East Lothian and Berwickshire catchment group .............................. 381 Almond and Edinburgh catchment group.......................................... 390 Firth of Forth catchment group ......................................................... 400 3.3 Coastal flooding ...................................................................................... 408 3.4 Surface water flooding ............................................................................ 418 Forth Estuary Local Plan District Section 3 378 3.1 Introduction In the Forth Estuary Local Plan District, river flooding is reported across two distinct river catchments. Coastal flooding and surface water flooding are reported across the whole Local Plan District. A summary of the number of properties and Annual Average Damages from river, coastal and surface water
  • PENMANSHIEL WIND FARM Environmental Statement 2011

    PENMANSHIEL WIND FARM Environmental Statement 2011

    PENMANSHIEL WIND FARM Environmental Statement 2011 Volume 1 : Non-Technical Summary CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................1 2 RES.............................................................................................................1 3 DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT .................................................................................2 Site Location ........................................................................................................ 2 Environmental Sensitivity ........................................................................................ 2 4 THE NEED FOR THE PROPOSED WIND FARM ..........................................................3 5 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED WIND FARM ........................................................3 Wind Turbines ...................................................................................................... 3 Site Access........................................................................................................... 4 Electrical Connection, Substation and Control Building .................................................... 4 Masts ................................................................................................................. 4 6 CONSTRUCTION AND DECOMMISSIONG OF THE PROPOSED WIND FARM ........................5 Construction ........................................................................................................ 5 Decommissioning ..................................................................................................
  • Alfred Stewart Property Foundation Ltd Hilton, Rosyth

    Alfred Stewart Property Foundation Ltd Hilton, Rosyth

    Alfred Stewart Property Foundation Ltd Hilton, Rosyth (Residential) FIFEplan Local Development Plan Proposed Plan December 2014 PPCA Ltd FIFEPlan Contents Local Development Plan Proposed Plan 1 Introduction ...................................................................... 2 2 Planning Policy Context ................................................... 4 3 Hilton as a Development Location ................................... 9 4 Proposed Uses .............................................................. 10 Hilton, Rosyth LDP-ROS002 5 Site Effectiveness .......................................................... 11 6 Access ............................................................................ 14 PPCA Ltd On behalf of 7 Council Site Assessment ............................................... 15 Alfred Stewart Property Foundation Limited 8 Conclusion ...................................................................... 20 Appendix 1 – Location Plan .................................................. 21 Appendix 2 – Indicative Development Framework .............. 23 Appendix 3 – Transport Planning Accessibility Statement . 25 Appendix 4 – Fifeplan LDP Candidate Site Assessment ...... 43 ASPFL Hilton, Rosyth 1 Introduction 1.2 Hilton represents an excellent opportunity to deliver a high quality residential development that will, in part, contribute to meeting 1.1 PPCA Ltd has been instructed by the Alfred Stewart Property the SESPlan additional housing requirement and address the Foundation Limited (ASPFL) to make a representation to
  • Grantshouse Community Council

    Grantshouse Community Council

    Grantshouse Community Council Thursday 14th April 2016 at 7.30pm in Grantshouse Village Hall If anyone attending these meetings, whether addressing the Community Council or not, should let the Chairman, Vice Chairman or Secretary know if they wish to have their names omitted from any comments. If there are no declarations, it will be presumed that there are no objections. AGENDA Approximate Time 1. Apologies 1 min 2. Police Scotland 5 min 3. Neighbourhood Watch Report 5 min 4. NTR 15 min 5. Previous Minutes 5 min 6. Matters Arising 20 min 7. Treasurers Report 5 min 8. Correspondence 10 min 9. Drone Hill Apps 10 min 10. Broadband 5 min 11. Any Other Business 10 min 12. Date of Next Meeting Thursday 12th May 2016 Anyone is welcome to attend and contributions are encouraged from anyone in the community. 1 Grantshouse Community Council Thursday 10th March 2016 in Grantshouse Village Hall Present: John Prentice (Chairman), Kym Bannerman, Marion Donovan, Pat Durie, Ian Fleming, Margaret Fleming, Walter Wyse (NHW Coordinator), Joan Campbell (Councillor), Martin Sweeney (NTR Plc), Robert Thomson (NTR Plc) Apologies: Pat Durie, PC Richard Toward (Police Scotland) and Michael Cook (Councillor) NTR Plc: Martin Sweeney (NTR) wanted to introduce himself and Robert Thomson (NTR) as Manager and Site Manager of the Quixwood Wind Farm Development. Martin has asked if there are any issues relating to the installation of the Wind Farm to be contacted by the CC. NTR started off as National Toll Roads in Dublin but now they invest in Wind Farms and build and run them for their lifespan.
  • The Mineral Resources of the Lothians

    The Mineral Resources of the Lothians

    The mineral resources of the Lothians Information Services Internal Report IR/04/017 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY INTERNAL REPORT IR/04/017 The mineral resources of the Lothians by A.G. MacGregor Selected documents from the BGS Archives No. 11. Formerly issued as Wartime pamphlet No. 45 in 1945. The original typescript was keyed by Jan Fraser, selected, edited and produced by R.P. McIntosh. The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Ordnance Survey licence number GD 272191/1999 Key words Scotland Mineral Resources Lothians . Bibliographical reference MacGregor, A.G. The mineral resources of the Lothians BGS INTERNAL REPORT IR/04/017 . © NERC 2004 Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2004 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of Survey publications is available from the BGS Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG Sales Desks at Nottingham and Edinburgh; see contact details 0115-936 3241 Fax 0115-936 3488 below or shop online at www.thebgs.co.uk e-mail: [email protected] The London Information Office maintains a reference collection www.bgs.ac.uk of BGS publications including maps for consultation. Shop online at: www.thebgs.co.uk The Survey publishes an annual catalogue of its maps and other publications; this catalogue is available from any of the BGS Sales Murchison House, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3LA Desks. 0131-667 1000 Fax 0131-668 2683 The British Geological Survey carries out the geological survey of e-mail: [email protected] Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the latter as an agency service for the government of Northern Ireland), and of the London Information Office at the Natural History Museum surrounding continental shelf, as well as its basic research (Earth Galleries), Exhibition Road, South Kensington, London projects.
  • Minutes of the Meeting of the Cabinet

    Minutes of the Meeting of the Cabinet

    Cabinet – 13/01/15 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CABINET TUESDAY 13 JANUARY 2015 COUNCIL CHAMBER, TOWN HOUSE, HADDINGTON Committee Members Present: Councillor S Akhtar Councillor T Day Councillor D Grant Councillor N Hampshire Councillor J McMillan Councillor M Veitch (Convener) Other Councillors Present: Councillor S Brown Councillor J Caldwell Councillor S Currie Councillor J Gillies Councillor J Goodfellow Councillor M Libberton Councillor P MacKenzie Councillor F McAllister Councillor K McLeod Council Officials Present: Mrs A Leitch, Chief Executive Ms M Patterson, Depute Chief Executive – Partnerships and Community Services Mr A McCrorie, Depute Chief Executive – Resources and People Services Mr J Lamond, Head of Council Resources Mr T Shearer, Head of Communities and Partnerships Mr M Leys, Head of Adult Wellbeing Mr D Proudfoot, Acting Head of Development Mrs M Ferguson, Service Manager – Legal and Procurement Mr P Vestri, Service Manager – Corporate Policy and Improvement Ms E Wilson, Service Manager – Economic Development and Strategic Investment Ms J Mackay, Media Manager Clerk: Ms A Smith Apologies: Councillor W Innes Declarations of Interest: None 1 Cabinet – 13/01/15 1. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CABINET OF 11 NOVEMBER 2014 The minutes of the meeting of the Cabinet of 11 November 2014 were approved. 2. SUMMARY OF CONTRACTS AWARDED BY EAST LOTHIAN COUNCIL, 9 OCTOBER 2014 – 17 DECEMBER 2014 A report was submitted by the Depute Chief Executive (Resources and People Services) advising Members of all contracts awarded by the Council from 9 October 2014 to 18 December 2014, with a value of over £150,000. Councillor Currie remarked that Hart Builders had submitted the second lowest tender for the project referred to in the report appendix.