SYRIANS in TURKEY Guests Without a Future?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Turkey's Refugee Resilience: Expanding and Improving Solutions for the Economic Inclusion of Syrians in Turkey
IN TURKEY Turkey’s Refugee Resilience: Expanding and Improving Solutions for the Economic Inclusion of Syrians in Turkey IN TURKEY The Atlantic Council in Turkey aims to promote dialogue and strengthen transatlantic engagement with the region through research, programming and high-level discussion forums to address critical issues around energy, economics, migration, and security. UNDP works in about 170 countries and territories, helping to achieve the eradication of poverty, and the reduction of inequalities and exclusion. We help countries to develop policies, leadership skills, partnering abilities, institutional capabilities and build resilience in order to sustain development results. Turkey’s Refugee Resilience: Expanding and Improving Solutions for the Economic Inclusion of Syrians in Turkey Bastien Revel ISBN-13: 978-1-61977-108-6 Cover: Syrian women at a food entrepreneurship training, Kilis. Photo Credit: Mustafa Bilge Satkın, @UNDP Turkey This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The au- thors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the United Nations Development Programme, the United Nations generally, or United Nations Member States. July 2020 ATLANTIC COUNCIL I Turkey’s Refugee Resilience: Expanding and Improving Solutions for the Economic Inclusion of Syrians in Turkey TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements 1 Foreword 2 Introduction 3 I. Syrians’ Livelihoods in Turkey 5 A. Turkey opened labor market to refugees 5 1. -
Değerlendirme Raporu Adana Değerlendirme Raporu
İZDES İLÇELER ADANA DEĞERLENDİRME RAPORU ADANA DEĞERLENDİRME RAPORU 2 İZDES İLÇELER ADANA DEĞERLENDİRME RAPORU İZDES İLÇELER ADANA DEĞERLENDİRME RAPORU 2020 İZDES İLÇELER 1 ADANA DEĞERLENDİRME RAPORU BAKAN SUNUŞU Devlet tarifinin giderek liberalleştiği ama devletten beklentilerin, hizmet miktarı ve kalitesi talebinin giderek arttığı bir zaman dilimi içinde yaşıyoruz. Devletle temasımızda daha az zaman harcamak ve kamu yönetiminin çözüm üretme noktasında daha etkin olduğu bir yapıya ulaşmak istiyoruz. Bu noktadan bakınca devlet teşkilatının saha uygulamalarını takip etmek, oradaki sorunları veya iyi uygulamaları yerinde görmek, oradan yapılan tespitlerle merkezi politikaları belirlemek, modern bir yaklaşım olarak kendini göstermektedir. Tıpkı özel sektör gibi zaman ve para kaynağının etkin kullanımını temin etmek, bunun denetimini sağlamak, 21. Yüzyıl devlet yapılarının olmazsa olmazı halini almaktadır. İçişleri Bakanlığı bünyesinde bir süredir uygulamakta olduğumuz ve kısa adı İZDES olan “İzleme ve Değerlendirme Sistemi”, işte bu düşünceler ve modern yönetim anlayışının bir gereği olarak ortaya çıkmış; kendi adına çok faydalı sonuçlar ortaya koymuştur. Bakanlığın tüm taşra birimlerinin ziyaret edildiği, sorunların ve yapılması gerekenlerin sahadaki insanlarla karşılıklı istişare edildiği, işlerin ve kapasitenin doğru bir envanterinin ortaya koyulabildiği, aynı zamanda vatandaşın beklentilerinin de öğrenildiği bu sistem, kamu yönetiminin verimini arttırmada bugün olduğu gibi gelecekte de çok önemli adımlara vesile olacaktır. Adana özelinde gerçekleştirilen İZDES çalışmalarının geniş kapsamlı bir özeti şeklindeki bu rapor, ilçe bazında olması sebebiyle de ayrı bir önem arz etmektedir. Adana ilindeki bakanlık faaliyetlerimizin net bir fotoğrafını ortaya koyan bu çalışma, inanıyorum ki hem diğer şehirlerimiz için hem de diğer kamu kurumlarımız için örnek teşkil edecektir. Bu vesileyle hem raporda emeği geçen hem de sahada vatandaşımıza hizmet üreten bütün mesai arkadaşlarımıza teşekkür ediyor, başarılı çalışmalarının devamını diliyorum. -
Assessing the Development- Displacement Nexus in Turkey
Assessing the Development- Displacement Nexus in Turkey Working Paper Fulya Memişoğlu November 2018 Assessing the Development- Displacement Nexus in Turkey Working Paper Acknowledgements This report is an output of the project Study on Refugee Protection and Development: Assessing the Development-Displacement Nexus in Regional Protection Policies, funded by the OPEC Fund for Inter- national Development (OFID) and the International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD). The author and ICMPD gratefully acknowledge OFID’s support. While no fieldwork was conducted for this report, the author thanks the Turkey Directorate General of Migration Management (DGMM) of the Ministry of Interior, the Ministry of Development, ICMPD Tur- key and the Refugee Studies Centre of Oxford University for their valuable inputs to previous research, which contributed to the author’s work. The author also thanks Maegan Hendow for her valuable feedback on this report. International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD) Gonzagagasse 1 A-1010 Vienna www.icmpd.com International Centre for Migration Policy Development Vienna, Austria All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission of the copyright owners. The content of this study does not reflect the official opinion of OFID or ICMPD. Responsibility for the information and views expressed in the study lies entirely with the author. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS \ 3 Contents Acknowledgements 3 Acronyms 6 1. Introduction 7 1.1 The Syrian crisis and Turkey 7 2. Refugee populations in Turkey 9 2.1 Country overview 9 2.2 Evolution and dynamics of the Syrian influx in Turkey 11 2.3 Characteristics of the Syrian refugee population 15 2.4 Legal status issues 17 2.5 Other relevant refugee flows 19 3. -
Syrians in Turkey – the Economics of Integration
EXPERTBRIEF REGIONAL POLITICS September 2016 Syrians in Turkey – The Economics of Integration Timur Kaymaz and Omar Kadkoy Abstract: Worldwide, as of 2016, IN HIS SPEECH TO CEOS OF FOREIGN INVESTMENT 65 million people have been companies just two weeks after the thwarted coup displaced from their homes, attempt of July 15, one of President Erdoğan’s very few the highest level ever recorded. policy oriented points concerned the country’s Syrian Moreover, Turkey is now home population. “If need be,” remarked Erdoğan, “We will give to the largest refugee population citizenship to the Syrians. Our ministries are carrying out in the world. As of August 2016, the necessary research. Rather than lodging them in tents, the number of registered Syrian in primitive conditions, we will give them citizenship. refugees (officially referred to There are lawyers, doctors, engineers, and nurses among as Syrians under Temporary them. Let us include these people in our society, so they Protection by the relevant can sustain themselves.”1 Turkish regulation, 2014/6883) is recorded as 2,724,937. To those familiar with Turkish politics, these remarks stood out from the rest of Erdoğan’s speech. The The integration of Syrians into president had already raised the citizenship issue earlier the Turkish economy has so far that month, and was met with discomfort from all parts been through human interaction of the political spectrum in Turkey. Indeed, according to rather than policy design. A a nationwide poll conducted in March 2016, 82.9 percent longterm, sustainable framework of the Turkish population opposed naturalizing Syrians.2 of integration for Syrian workers The failed coup attempt of July 15 and the political and entrepreneurs is still environment in its wake had provided an opportunity to missing as we near the fifth quietly bury the citizenship proposal, but the president anniversary of the refugee influx. -
Barometer THEMES
KONDA Barometer THEMES Perception on Syrian Asylum-Seekers February 2016 KONDA FEBRUARY 16’ PERCEPTION ON SYRIAN ASYLUM-SEEKERS 2 CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 5 2. PERCEPTION ON SYRIAN ASYLUM-SEEKERS ................................................................ 7 2.1. The Latest Status of Syrian Migrants in Turkey and Areas of Study .............................. 7 2.2. Information on Asylum-Seekers in Turkey ....................................................................... 9 2.3. Theoretical Framework: Ghost Citizens ........................................................................ 11 2.4. Outlook on Foreigners: Selecting Migrants................................................................... 14 2.4.1. Differentiation Outlook on Foreigners ................................................................... 16 2.4.2. Changing Perception of Migrants .......................................................................... 17 2.4.3. Economic Uncertainty and Aversion to Foreigners .............................................. 18 2.4.4. Comparison of the Opinion on Foreigners - Turkey vs. Europe ........................... 19 2.5. Social Acceptance / Status of Asylum Seekers ........................................................... 22 2.6. Areas of Contact ............................................................................................................. 24 2.7. Influence of Asylum-seekers on Economics and -
Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek
ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ Alpaslan SALTAN ADANA İLİ ALADAĞ İLÇESİ KÖKEZ KÖYÜNÜN SOSYO-EKONOMİK YAPISI VE KALKINMA AÇISINDAN TARIMSAL YAYIM ÇALIŞMALARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ TARIM EKONOMİSİ ANABİLİM DALI ADANA,2006 ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ ADANA İLİ ALADAĞ İLÇESİ KÖKEZ KÖYÜNÜN SOSYO-EKONOMİK YAPISI VE KALKINMA AÇISINDAN TARIMSAL YAYIM ÇALIŞMALARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ Alpaslan SALTAN YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ TARIM EKONOMİSİ ANABİLİM DALI Bu tez / / 2006 Tarihinde Aşağıdaki Jüri Üyeleri Tarafından Oy Birliği/Oy Çokluğu İle Kabul Edilmiştir. İmza :……………………. İmza :……………….... İmza :……….……… Prof. Dr. Faruk EMEKSİZ Prof. Dr. Onur ERKAN Prof. Dr. Veyis TANSI DANIŞMAN ÜYE ÜYE Bu Tez Enstitümüz Tarım Ekonomisi Anabilim Dalında Hazırlanmıştır. Kod No : Prof. Dr. Aziz ERTUNÇ Enstitü Müdürü İmza ve Mühür Bu Çalışma Çukurova Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi Tarafından Desteklenmiştir. Proje No: ZF2005YL6 Not : Bu tezde kullanılan özgün ve başka kaynaklardan yapılan bildirişlerin, çizelge, şekil ve fotoğrafların kaynak gösterilmeden kullanımı, 5846 sayılı Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunundaki hükümlere tabidir. ÖZ YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ ADANA İLİ ALADAĞ İLÇESİ KÖKEZ KÖYÜNÜN SOSYO-EKONOMİK YAPISI VE KALKINMA AÇISINDAN TARIMSAL YAYIM ÇALIŞMALARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ Alpaslan SALTAN ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ TARIM EKONOMİSİ ANABİLİM DALI Danışman : Prof. Dr. Faruk EMEKSİZ Yıl:2006, Sayfa:72 Jüri : Prof. Dr. Faruk EMEKSİZ Prof. Dr. Onur ERKAN Prof. Dr. Veyis TANSI Araştırma Adana İli Aladağ İlçesi Kökez köyünde yürütülmüştür. Kökez 1.081 nüfuslu, ilçeye 14 km uzaklıkta bir dağ köyüdür. Bu çalışmada, köyün yerleşme düzeni, nüfusu, toplumsal yapısı, ekonomik yapısı, altyapı ve kamusal hizmetleri, tarımsal yayım hizmetleri incelenmiştir. Aynı zamanda çalışmada, 1.000 Köye 1.000 Tarımcı Projesi kapsamında çalışan personelin yürüttüğü tarımsal yayım faaliyetleri ve köyün kalkınması konusunda olası etkileri araştırılmıştır. -
The Economic and Social Impact of COVID-19 on Women and Men
The economic and social impact of COVID-19 on women and men Rapid Gender Assessment of COVID-19 implications in Turkey ©2020 UN Women. All rights reserved. Published by UN Women Turkey Office Lead Author: Dr. Yasemin Kalaylıoğlu Contributing Authors: Arif Mert Öztürk, Gözde Bingüler Eker This publication reflects the findings of a rapid gender assessment of immediate social and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on women and men in Turkey, commissioned by UN Women in April 2020. It is based on a nationally representative survey among women and men, conducted by research company SAM Araştırma Danışmanlık A.Ş. The rapid gender assessment was conducted with the generous contribution and support of Sweden through Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of UN Women, the United Nations, any of its associated organizations or the offical position of Sweden. 2 Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................... 4 TABLE OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................... 5 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 6 2. SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS ................................................................................................................ -
Dogan and Others V Turkey 29Jun04
CONSEIL COUNCIL DE L’EUROPE OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION CASE OF DOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (Applications nos. 8803-8811/02, 8813/02 and 8815-8819/02) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 29 June 2004 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. DOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Dogan and Others v. Turkey, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Mr G. RESS, President, Mr I. CABRAL BARRETO, Mr L. CAFLISCH, Mr R. TÜRMEN, Mr J. HEDIGAN, Mrs M. TSATSA-NIKOLOVSKA, Mrs H.S. GREVE, judges, and Mr V. BERGER, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 12 February and 10 June 2004, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last-mentioned date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in fifteen applications (nos. 8803/02, 8804/02, 8805/02, 8806/02, 8807/02, 8808/02, 8809/02, 8810/02, 8811/02, 8813/02, 8815/02, 8816/02, 8817/02, 8818/02 and 8819/02) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by fifteen Turkish nationals, Mr Abdullah Dogan, Mr Cemal Dogan, Mr Ali Riza Dogan, Mr Ahmet Dogan, Mr Ali Murat Dogan, Mr Hasan Yildiz, Mr Hidir Balik, Mr Ihsan Balik, Mr Kazim Balik, Mr Mehmet Dogan, Mr Müslüm Yildiz, Mr Hüseyin Dogan, Mr Yusuf Dogan, Mr Hüseyin Dogan and Mr Ali Riza Dogan (“the applicants”), on 3 December 2001. -
DFAT COUNTRY INFORMATION REPORT TURKEY 10 September 2020
DFAT COUNTRY INFORMATION REPORT TURKEY 10 September 2020 MAP This map is presented for information only. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade accepts no responsibility for errors or omission of any geographic feature. Nomenclature and territorial boundaries may not necessarily reflect Australian government policy. Provided by the Commonwealth of Australia under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. DFAT Country Information Report Turkey SEPTEMBER 2020 2 CONTENTS ACRONYMS 4 GLOSSARY 6 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE 7 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 8 Recent History 8 Demography 9 Economic Overview 9 Political System 14 Human Rights Framework 16 Security Situation 18 3. REFUGEE CONVENTION CLAIMS 20 Race/Nationality 20 Religion 22 Political Opinion (Actual or imputed) 27 Groups of Interest 31 4. COMPLEMENTARY PROTECTION CLAIMS 40 Arbitrary Deprivation of Life 40 Death Penalty 41 Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment 41 5. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS 45 State Protection 45 Internal Relocation 49 Treatment of Returnees 49 Documentation 50 DFAT Country Information Report Turkey SEPTEMBER 2020 3 ACRONYMS AKP Justice and Development Party (the ruling conservative political party) AKS Address Registration System BTK Information and Communication Technologies Authority CAT Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women CHP Republican People’s Party (centre-left opposition political party) CMHC Community -
Mansurlu – Feke Havzasi, Adana) Demir Yatağinin Maden Jeolojisi
ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ MAĞARABELİ (MANSURLU – FEKE HAVZASI, ADANA) DEMİR YATAĞININ MADEN JEOLOJİSİ Elif EKEN JEOLOJİ MÜHENDİSLİĞİ ANABİLİM DALI ANKARA 2012 Her hakkı saklıdır ÖZET Yüksek Lisans Tezi MAĞARABELİ (MANSURLU – FEKE HAVZASI, ADANA) DEMİR YATAĞININ MADEN JEOLOJİSİ Elif EKEN Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Jeoloji Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı Danışman: Prof. Dr. Taner ÜNLÜ Mağarabeli demir yatağı ve çevresinde, Toridler tektonik birliği içinde yer alan Geyikdağı birliğine özgü; Emirgazi formasyonu, Zabuk formasyonu, Değirmentaş formasyonu ve Armutludere formasyonu litolojileri yüzeyler. Yatakta, şu anki konumu ile cevher ve yan kayaçlar (Değirmentaş formasyonu litolojileri) tektonik ilişkilidir. Cevherleşme sonrası gelişen faylar, yatağı yüzeye taşımış ve özellikle bu zonlarda gelişen karstlaşma ve yüzeysel etkileşimlerin, büyük bir çoğunlukla sideritleri ve Fe minerallerini tamamen limonit ve götite dönüştürdüğü saptanmıştır. Cevher, genelde hematit ve limonit/götitten oluşmakta olup, çok büyük bir bölümü ile siderit dönüşüm ürünü şeklinde izlenmektedir. Ana bileşenler olarak, cevher; % 68.22-84.63 Fe2O3 (toplam demir), % 9.75-16.92 A.K., % 0.7611-1.822 MnO ve % 1.787-13.75 SiO2 içermektedir. Yan kayaçlarda ise, 38-202 ppm arasında değişen Cr2O3 içerikleri saptanmıştır. Cr elementinin büyük bir olasılıkla fuksit mineralinden kaynaklandığı düşünülmektedir. Tüm cevher ve yan kayaç örneklerinde az da olsa opal-CT ve amorf malzeme belirlenmiştir. Örneklere özgü kimyasal ve mineralojik-petrografik verilerin değerlendirilmesi sonucunda demir oluşumlarının Fe element kökeni konusunda, oluşum ortamındaki olası bazik kayaçlara doğru olan bir eğilim (izler) saptanmıştır. Tüm çalışma bölgede yapılan eski çalışmalar ile birlikte yorumlandığında, bölgede yer alan demir yataklarının; Prekambriyen yaşlı, rift kökenli volkanik-sinsedimanter kökenli demir yatakları ile olan yakın akrabalıkları güncellik kazanmaktadır. -
Culture, Politics and Contested Identity Among the “Kurdish” Alevis of Dersim: the Case of the Munzur Culture and Nature Festival
Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies Copyright 2019 2019, Vol. 6, No. 1, 63-76 ISSN: 2149-1291 Culture, Politics and Contested Identity among the “Kurdish” Alevis of Dersim: The Case of the Munzur Culture and Nature Festival Ülker Sözen1 Netherlands Institute in Turkey This article analyzes the Munzur Culture and Nature Festival organized by the people of Dersim, an eastern province of Turkey, as a site of political activism, cultural reproduction, and intra-group contestation. The festival began as a group- remaking event for restoring cultural identity, defending locality, and mobilizing Dersimli people in the face of political repression. In time, socio-spatial and political fragmentation within Dersimli society became more prevalent. The festival experience came to reflect and contribute to the debates and anxieties about identity whereby different political groups competed to increase their influence over local politics as well as the event itself. On the one hand, this article discusses the organization of the Munzur Festival, its historical trajectory, and the accompanying public debates and criticisms. On the other, it explores festive sociabilities, cultural performances, and the circulation of politically-charged symbols throughout the event which showcases the articulation and competition of multiple ethno-political belongings which are the Dersimli, Kurdish, Alevi, and socialist ones. The festival’s historical trajectory is dealt as two stages, unified struggle and internal strife, whereby the festival appeared as first a group-remaking then unmaking public event. The paper argues that this transformation is tied to hanging power relations in the local politics of Dersim, and the shifting state policies, namely the phase of repressive control strategies until the mid-2000s and the peace process and political relaxation until 2015. -
Un-Finished Route of Dom Migrants from Syria to Çukurova: Situation Analysis Map
Un-finished Route of Dom Migrants from Syria to Çukurova: Situation Analysis Map Poster design: Kurtuluş Karaşın Estimated population of Syrain Dom communities living in Şanlıurfa, Gaziantep, Adana and Mersin, July 2016 00 As the Dom communities move very frequently, the settlements and populations are also changing within time TUFANBEYLİ 35 - Tufaneyli entrance - Next to Hastane Village - Next to Sand Pits Western - Yenimahalle Side of Euphrates River - On Old Antakya Road - Saha Neighborhood - Living with seasonal workers - Hoca Şerif Neighborhood from Keferdiz Village - Near to Çakmak Village Junction on Old Gaziantep Road - Ceyhan Adana entrance - Side of the tile factory - Birkethane Ceydaş Across factory - Emek Neighborhood Neighborhood Seasonal Workers Tents YAVUZELİ VİRANŞEHİR - Şırnak 50 Neighborhood NURDAĞI 1.200 1.000 100 ADANA 100 ŞANLIURFA İSLAHİYE BİRECİK CEYHAN GAZİANTEP NİZİP CENTER CENTER 6.000 YÜREĞİR 250 SURUÇ 5.000 OĞUZELİ 2.000 150 CEYLANPINAR ADANA-KARATAŞ ROAD 50 KARKAMIŞ - On the Hıdantlı Yeşilova Road 200 - Buğday AKÇAKALE 1.000 4.000 - Hürriyet Neighborhood MERSİN 50 Pazarı Neighborhood 50 - On Urfa - Yunus Emre Neighborhood Road - On GATEM Junction on Urfa Road - Namık Kemal Neighborhood - On Nizip Karakamış - On Old Suruç - GATEM - Fevzi paşa Neighborhood Road Road - İmam Keskin Neighborhood - Şiirinevler - Tathtani Neighborhood - Inside Eyyüp City Constructions - Halkkent Neighborhood - Ünaldı Çevre Neighborhood - On Akçakale Road, Eyübiye - Serinevler Neighborhood - Vatan Neighborhood Neighborhood and nearby