The Dismantling of the Standard Oil Trust

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Dismantling of the Standard Oil Trust The Dismantling of The Standard Oil Trust The saga of Standard Oil ranks as one of the most dramatic episodes in the history of the U.S. economy. It occurred at a time when the country was undergoing its rapid transformation from a mainly agricultural society to the greatest industrial powerhouse the world has ever known. The effects of Standard Oil on the U.S., as well as on much of the rest of the world, were immense, and the lessons that can be learned from this amazing story are possibly as relevant today as they were a century ago. Standard Oil Company was founded by John D. Rockefeller in Cleveland, Ohio in 1870, and, in just a little over a decade, it had attained control of nearly all the oil refineries in the U.S. This dominance of oil, together with its tentacles entwined deep into the railroads, other industries and even various levels of government, persisted and intensified, despite a growing public outcry and repeated attempts to break it up, until the U.S. Supreme Court was finally able to act decisively in 1911. John D. Rockefeller John Davidson Rockefeller was born the second of six children into a working class family in Richford, (upstate) New York in 1839. In 1853, the family moved to a farm in Strongsville, Ohio, near Cleveland. Under pressure from his father, Rockefeller dropped out of high school shortly before commencement and entered a professional school, where he studied penmanship, bookkeeping, banking and commercial law. In 1859 Edwin Drake struck oil in Titusville, in western Pennsylvania. This triggered an oil rush to the region and marked the start of oil as a major industry in the U.S. Coincidentally, this was the same year that Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species was published, a work that had a great influence not only on the sciences, but also on business and society in general. It was also in 1859 that Rockefeller started his first business. With $1,000 he had saved and another $1,000 borrowed from his father, and in partnership with another young man, Maurice B. Clark, he set up a commission business that dealt with a variety of products including hay, grain and meats. After the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861, Rockefeller hired a substitute to avoid conscription, as was not uncommon among Northerners in those days. Although the war initially disrupted the economy, it soon began to stimulate development in the North, and this appears to have been an important factor in Rockefeller's sudden and spectacular success. The Titusville discovery led to the swift ascent of a major new industry based largely on the use of kerosene for lighting. Oil refining became largely concentrated in Cleveland because of its proximity to the oil fields of Western Pennsylvania, its excellent (and competitive) railroad service, its availability of cheap water transportation (on adjacent Lake Erie) and its abundant supplies of low cost immigrant labor. Rockefeller was immediately attracted to the oil business, and in 1863, at the age of 24, he established a refinery in Cleveland with Clark and a new partner, Samuel Andrews, a chemist who already had several years of refining experience. Fueled by the soaring demand for oil and Rockefeller's ambition, this refinery became the largest in the region within a mere two years, and Rockefeller thereafter focused most of his attention on oil for the next three decades. Standard Oil Company In 1870, Rockefeller, together with his brother William, Henry M. Flagler and Samuel Andrews, established the Standard Oil Company of Ohio. This occurred while the petroleum refining industry was still highly decentralized, with more than 250 competitors in the U.S. The company almost immediately began using a variety of cutthroat techniques to acquire or destroy competitors and thereby "consolidate" the industry. They included: (1) Temporarily undercutting the prices of competitors until they either went out of business or sold out to Standard Oil. (2) Buying up the components needed to make oil barrels in order to prevent competitors from getting their oil to customers. (3) Using its large and growing volume of oil shipments to negotiate an alliance with the railroads that gave it secret rebates and thereby reduced its effective shipping costs to a level far below the rates charged to its competitors. (4) Secretly buying up competitors and then having officials from those companies spy on and give advance warning of deals being planned by other competitors. (5) Secretly buying up or creating new oil-related companies, such as pipeline and engineering firms, that appeared be independent operators but which gave Standard Oil hidden rebates. (6) Dispatching thugs who used threats and physical violence to break up the operations of competitors who could not otherwise be persuaded. By 1873 Standard Oil had acquired about 80 percent of the refining capacity in Cleveland, which constituted roughly one third of the U.S. total. The stock market crash in September of that year triggered a recession that lasted for six years, and Standard Oil quickly took advantage of the situation to absorb refineries in Pennsylvania's oil region, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia and New York. By 1878 Rockefeller had attained control of nearly 90 percent of the oil refined in the U.S., and shortly thereafter he had gained control of most of the oil marketing facilities in the U.S. Standard Oil initially focused on horizontal integration (i.e., at the same stage of production) by gaining control of other oil refineries. But gradually the integration also became vertical (i.e., extended to other stages of production and distribution), mainly by acquiring pipelines, railroad tank cars, terminal facilities and barrel manufacturing factories. Standard Oil Trust The company continued to prosper and expand its empire, and, in 1882, all of its properties and those of its affiliates were merged into the Standard Oil Trust, which was, in effect, one huge organization with tremendous power but a murky legal existence. It was the first of the great corporate trusts. A trust was an arrangement whereby the stockholders in a group of companies transferred their shares to a single set of trustees who controlled all of the companies. In exchange, the stockholders received certificates entitling them to a specified share of the consolidated earnings of the jointly managed companies. The concept of a trust was first proposed by Samuel Dodd, an attorney working for Standard Oil. In the case of Standard Oil, a board of nine trustees, controlled by Rockefeller, was set up and was given control of all the properties of Standard Oil and its numerous affiliates. Each stockholder received 20 trust certificates for each share of Standard Oil stock. The trustees elected the directors and officers of each of the component companies, and all of the profits of those companies were sent to the trustees, who decided the dividends. This arrangement allowed all of the companies to function in unison as a highly disciplined monopoly. Since its earliest days, the U.S. oil industry had been well aware of the power of monopoly and its huge profits potential. Although the seemingly erratic fluctuations of oil prices had convinced many refiners to try to restrict output in a joint effort, these attempts never lasted long because the incentives to cheat were so great. However, the unified organization of the trust finally made the disciplined regulation of production levels possible, thereby giving its owners complete control over prices. The massive and unprecedented profits of Standard Oil were made possible by (1) this control over prices (and the consequent ability to set prices at levels that would maximize profits), (2) the huge economies of scale attained from the control of almost all oil refined in the U.S. and (3) the ability to pressure railroads and other suppliers of goods and services into giving them bargain rates. However, even this unprecedented wealth and power was not enough. Rockefeller and Standard Oil needed ever more. The company thus expanded into the overseas markets, particularly Western Europe and Asia, and after a while it was selling even more oil abroad than in the U.S. Moreover, Rockefeller, in addition to his role as the head of Standard Oil, also invested in numerous companies in manufacturing, transportation and other industries and owned major iron mines and extensive tracts of timberland. The astonishing success of Standard Oil encouraged others to follow the Rockefeller business model, particularly in the booming final decades of the 19th century. Trusts were established in close to 200 industries, although most never came close to Standard Oil in size or profitability. Among the largest were railroads, coal, steel, sugar, tobacco and meatpacking. Public Disgust and Revulsion This trend went far from unnoticed by the general public. In fact, it led to widespread disgust and revulsion, not only among the many people who had their businesses or jobs wiped out by the ruthless predatory tactics of the trusts, but also by countless others who were affected by the increased costs and reduced levels of service that often resulted from the elimination of competition. The monopolization of the economy also became a major topic for the print media, which helped to create a widespread awareness not only of the effects of this consolidation but also of the techniques that were being used to attain it, including the extensive use of fraud, political corruption and physical violence. For example, in 1881 the Atlantic Monthly published Story of a Great Monopoly by the well-known reformer Henry Demarest Lloyd, and the widespread popularity of this article resulted in Lloyd's publication in 1894 of Wealth against Commonwealth, a book-length attack on monopolies based largely on his study of Standard Oil.
Recommended publications
  • 1835. EXECUTIVE. *L POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT
    1835. EXECUTIVE. *l POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT. Persons employed in the General Post Office, with the annual compensation of each. Where Compen­ Names. Offices. Born. sation. Dol. cts. Amos Kendall..., Postmaster General.... Mass. 6000 00 Charles K. Gardner Ass't P. M. Gen. 1st Div. N. Jersey250 0 00 SelahR. Hobbie.. Ass't P. M. Gen. 2d Div. N. York. 2500 00 P. S. Loughborough Chief Clerk Kentucky 1700 00 Robert Johnson. ., Accountant, 3d Division Penn 1400 00 CLERKS. Thomas B. Dyer... Principal Book Keeper Maryland 1400 00 Joseph W. Hand... Solicitor Conn 1400 00 John Suter Principal Pay Clerk. Maryland 1400 00 John McLeod Register's Office Scotland. 1200 00 William G. Eliot.. .Chie f Examiner Mass 1200 00 Michael T. Simpson Sup't Dead Letter OfficePen n 1200 00 David Saunders Chief Register Virginia.. 1200 00 Arthur Nelson Principal Clerk, N. Div.Marylan d 1200 00 Richard Dement Second Book Keeper.. do.. 1200 00 Josiah F.Caldwell.. Register's Office N. Jersey 1200 00 George L. Douglass Principal Clerk, S. Div.Kentucky -1200 00 Nicholas Tastet Bank Accountant Spain. 1200 00 Thomas Arbuckle.. Register's Office Ireland 1100 00 Samuel Fitzhugh.., do Maryland 1000 00 Wm. C,Lipscomb. do : for) Virginia. 1000 00 Thos. B. Addison. f Record Clerk con-> Maryland 1000 00 < routes and v....) Matthias Ross f. tracts, N. Div, N. Jersey1000 00 David Koones Dead Letter Office Maryland 1000 00 Presley Simpson... Examiner's Office Virginia- 1000 00 Grafton D. Hanson. Solicitor's Office.. Maryland 1000 00 Walter D. Addison. Recorder, Div. of Acc'ts do..
    [Show full text]
  • Sohio Lie",. JANUARY 1970
    ;C1IIILJ. BBllIIIIS lOBIlII. OIL ~8I1PI.IY i - January 10, 1870 - purpose of "manufacturing petroleum and dealing in CLEVELAN~A new corporation was formed petroleum products under the corporate name The Standard Oil Company." here today when the nation's largest petroleum ~ The corporation concept is a relatively new business refining company, bucking a severe depression Flashback to 1870 device. Real operating corporations are rare. The Cleve­ in the oil industry, reorganized. The new firm I land city directory lists only 32. will be known as The Standard Oil Company. secretary-treasurer; Samuel Andrews, superintendent John Rockefeller explained that incorporation seemed It takes over the business and property of the firm of works; and Stephen V. Harkness, 49, a wealthy wise for his company because "kerosine manufacturing of Rockefeller, Andrews, and Flagler, which operated liquor merchant. is becoming an industry in which only large establish­ two refineries and a huge barrelmaking plant here, Oliver B. Jennings, 45, who made a fortune selling ments have any certainty of survivaL" plus related shipping and warehousing facilities in supplies to gold rush prospectors in California, is the Last year 26 refining companies went bankrupt Northeastern Pennsylvania and New York City. sixth stockholder and director. He is a brother-in-law because of inadequate facilities and lack of capital. Incorporators of The Standard Oil Company are of William Rockefeller. Asked who conceived the idea of incorporating John D. Rockefeller, 30, president; his brother William, The 200-word articles of incorporation, filed in Cuy­ Standard Oil, Rockefeller replied, "I wish I'd had the 28, vice-president and manager of the company's ex­ ahoga Common Pleas Court before Justice of the Peace brains to think of it.
    [Show full text]
  • JP Morgan and the Money Trust
    FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST. LOUIS ECONOMIC EDUCATION The Panic of 1907: J.P. Morgan and the Money Trust Lesson Author Mary Fuchs Standards and Benchmarks (see page 47) Lesson Description The Panic of 1907 was a financial crisis set off by a series of bad banking decisions and a frenzy of withdrawals caused by public distrust of the banking system. J.P. Morgan, along with other wealthy Wall Street bankers, loaned their own funds to save the coun- try from a severe financial crisis. But what happens when a single man, or small group of men, have the power to control the finances of a country? In this lesson, students will learn about the Panic of 1907 and the measures Morgan used to finance and save the major banks and trust companies. Students will also practice close reading to analyze texts from the Pujo hearings, newspapers, and reactionary articles to develop an evidence- based argument about whether or not a money trust—a Morgan-led cartel—existed. Grade Level 10-12 Concepts Bank run Bank panic Cartel Central bank Liquidity Money trust Monopoly Sherman Antitrust Act Trust ©2015, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Permission is granted to reprint or photocopy this lesson in its entirety for educational purposes, provided the user credits the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, www.stlouisfed.org/education. 1 Lesson Plan The Panic of 1907: J.P. Morgan and the Money Trust Time Required 100-120 minutes Compelling Question What did J.P. Morgan have to do with the founding of the Federal Reserve? Objectives Students will • define bank run, bank panic, monopoly, central bank, cartel, and liquidity; • explain the Panic of 1907 and the events leading up to the panic; • analyze the Sherman Antitrust Act; • explain how monopolies worked in the early 20th-century banking industry; • develop an evidence-based argument about whether or not a money trust—a Morgan-led cartel—existed • explain how J.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Vindicating Capitalism: the Real History of the Standard Oil Company
    Vindicating Capitalism: The Real History of the Standard Oil Company By Alex Epstein Who were we that we should succeed where so many others failed? Of course, there was something wrong, some dark, evil mystery, or we never should have succeeded!1 —John D. Rockefeller The Standard Story of Standard Oil In 1881, The Atlantic magazine published Henry Demarest Lloyd’s essay “The Story of a Great Monopoly”—the first in- depth account of one of the most infamous stories in the history of capitalism: the “monopolization” of the oil refining market by the Standard Oil Company and its leader, John D. Rockefeller. “Very few of the forty millions of people in the United States who burn kerosene,” Lloyd wrote, know that its production, manufacture, and export, its price at home and abroad, have been controlled for years by a single corporation—the Standard Oil Company... The Standard produces only one fiftieth or sixtieth of our petroleum, but dictates the price of all, and refines nine tenths. This corporation has driven into bankruptcy, or out of business, or into union with itself, all the petroleum refineries of the country except five in New York, and a few of little consequence in Western Pennsylvania... the means by which they achieved monopoly was by conspiracy with the railroads... [Rockefeller] effected secret arrangements with the Pennsylvania, the New York Central, the Erie, and the Atlantic and Great Western... After the Standard had used the rebate to crush out the other refiners, who were its competitors in the purchase of petroleum at the wells, it became the only buyer, and dictated the price.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 7 Business Regulation Case Study: Standard Oil
    UNIT 7 BUSINESS REGULATION CASE STUDY: STANDARD OIL CHAPTER 1 THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION ..................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 2 ROCKEFELLER’S MILLIONS ...........................................................................................................7 CHAPTER 3 JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IN CLEVELAND.................................................................................12 CHAPTER 4 THE THEORY OF LAISSEZ-FAIRE................................................................................................15 CHAPTER 5 EMPIRE ʹS CHALLENGE TO STANDARD ..................................................................................19 CHAPTER 6 BUSINESS 0RGANIZATIONS.........................................................................................................23 CHAPTER 7 ROBBER BARON OR INDUSTRIAL STATESMAN ....................................................................28 CHAPTER 8 THE SHERMAN ANTI-TRUST ACT AND STANDARD OIL....................................................33 CHAPTER 9 STANDARD OIL ON TRIAL...........................................................................................................36 CHAPTER 10 THE SUPREME COURT DECIDES...............................................................................................39 by Thomas Ladenburg, copyright, 1974, 1998, 2001, 2007 100 Brantwood Road, Arlington, MA 02476 781-646-4577 [email protected] Page 1 Chapter 1 The Industrial Revolution he word ‘revolution’ implies
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Daily Press: July 13,1882
    Pi) RTLA N D DAI LY v PRICE 3 CERTS. JUNE 1862--VOL. 20. PORTLAND, THURSDAY MORNING, JULY 13, 1882. f^8Biii£9.^2£J ESTABLISHED 23, i—t ■nan m -- ...iniMurw.nrmwr""-™—■■——c—rr^Mnwnrerr— UMHifi ill MTTr—r—————^W—■>——— 1825. —David Sbepley, b. Norridgowock. June Ia Ohio and Illinois, three who now pursues bis studies without blood, and COMMENCEMENTS. 1, stated of Rev. Nathan Rev. Lincoln that ignorance is the mother of devotion, and Pennsylvania, 1804, d. Providence, K. I., Dec. 1, 1881; 77.J THE PORTLAND DAILY PRESS, BRIDGTON ACADEMY. Church, central is not with sole desire for improvement. This com- that devotion to these churches is the safety of great states where self support 1826. —William Tyng Hilliard, b. Gorham, Feb. Ripley and Sa.ruel Farnsworth. The Alumni the The chain that binds tbe Yet the seat of the Greek church, difficult, one in ten of the illiterates is a of Academy— d. Bangor, Nov, 9, 1881; 76. PubllBhol every day (Sundays excepted,) by mittee ono with like powors and duties, humanity. its to it's its with its 20, 1808, (or while of the rest of the on- present past; memories hopes. Alumni Associa- 1826. Yetton Sawver, b. N. number a where nine-tenths of the pauper, population, Bowdoin College—The —George Wakefield, but consisting of a different portion —Russia,- popula- Here, at our where the memory of the ft d. N. June PORTLAND PI BL1SHINU CO., Celebration of Its 75th Anniver- has this the one in three hundred is a pauper. In other Alma-Mater, Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancestry of George W. Bush Compiled by William Addams Reitwiesner
    Ancestry of George W. Bush (b. 1946) Page 1 of 150 Ancestry of George W. Bush compiled by William Addams Reitwiesner The following material on the immediate ancestry of George W. Bush was initially compiled from two sources: The ancestry of his father, President George Bush, as printed in Gary Boyd Roberts, Ancestors of American Presidents, First Authoritative Edition [Santa Clarita, Cal.: Boyer, 1995], pp. 121-130. The ancestry of his mother, Barbara Bush, based on the unpublished work of Michael E. Pollock, [email protected]. The contribution of the undersigned consists mostly in collating and renumbering the material cited above, adding considerable information from the decennial censuses and elsewhere, and HTML-izing the results. The relationships to other persons (see the NOTES section below) are intended to be illustrative rather than exhaustive, and are taken mostly from Mr. Roberts' Notable Kin and Ancestors of American Presidents books, with extensions, where appropriate, from John Young's American Reference Genealogy and from my own, generally unpublished, research. This page can be found at two places on the World Wide Web, first at http://hometown.aol.com/wreitwiesn/candidates2000/bush.html and again at http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~addams/presidential/bush.html. The first site will be updated first and more frequently, while the second site will be more stable. William Addams Reitwiesner [email protected] Ancestry of George W. Bush George Walker Bush, b. New Haven, Conn., 6 July 1946, Governor of Texas from 1994 to 2000, U.S. President from 2001 1 m. Glass Memorial Chapel, First United Memorial Church, Midland, Texas, 5 Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile of John D. Rockefeller
    Profile of John D. Rockefeller Few family names are arguably better known in the United States than the Rockefellers. As convenient and visible public icons of wealth, big business, and politics, the Rockefellers have been revered and reviled in American music, literature, and news media. For instance, during the Great Depression, Louis Armstrong sung about being as “Rich as Rockefeller”. Decades later, for many Americans, “Rockefeller” is still synonymous with money and power. The Rockefellers have made substantial contributions to American politics, health care, and arts as well as to the controversial “competitive capitalism” or business monopoly that gripped the nation at the turn of the 20th century. Few Americans are aware, however, of the equally profound influence the family patriarch, John D. Rockefeller, had on American philanthropy and traditions of civic responsibility and leadership. John D. Rockefeller was born in 1839 on a farm in Richford, NY, the son of William A. and Eliza Rockefeller. One of six Rockefeller children, John and his family moved to Ohio in his teenage years. John attended public schools in Cleveland and after a short stint at a business college, began work as a bookkeeper. Deeply religious, Rockefeller worshiped at a Baptist Church each Sunday and by age 21 was selected as a Church trustee. He regularly gave a portion of all his total earnings to his church, as well as to other religious and charitable endeavors. At his first job, Rockefeller earned all of $3.57 for a week’s work. In wasn’t long, however, before the ambitious young man joined with a partner in 1859 to start a produce business, using for capital $1,000 in savings and a $1,000 loan from his father.
    [Show full text]
  • Authorised Cartels in Twentieth-Century Japan
    10 Policy transfer and its limits Authorised cartels in twentieth-century Japan Takahiro Ohata and Takafumi Kurosawa Introduction The history of cartel registration in Japan deserves special attention for several reasons. First, the country had the world’s most institutionalised and encompassing cartel registration system during the second half of the twentieth century. A system- atic international comparison conducted by Corwin Edwards, a renowned trust-buster in US and founder of Japan’s post-war antimonopoly law, showed that the scope of reporting requirements was the widest in Japan among the 11 nations compared (Wells 2002; Edwards 1967: 48). Second, Japan’s system clearly exhibits the dual nature of the cartel register; namely, authorisation of cartels on the one hand, and containment of them on the other. The balance between these two factors changed over time, reflecting the industrial structure, the role of state intervention, and the international environ- ment. Additionally, Japan is representative of how the practice of cartel registration flourished in the spheres between the general prohibition of cartel and economic liberalism, where laissez-faire meant the liberty of contract and relative freedom for cartels. Third, Japan’s cartel registration system exhibits the uniqueness as well as the universality of the nation’s experience. Its uniqueness lies in the dramatic volte-face in the competition policy following American occupation and policy transfer imme- diately after the Second World War. The huge leap from the promotion of cartels and a war economy to the other extreme of an idealistic and draconian post-war anti- trust law was ordered and supervised by the General Headquarters of the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers (GHQ/SCAP).
    [Show full text]
  • Titan: the Life of John D. Rockefeller
    Titan: The Life of 207 & 208 John D. Rockefeller, Sr. Reviewed by Robert Schmidt By Ron Chernow About the Author Ron Chernow won the National Book Award in 1990 for his first book, The House of Morgan, and his second book, The Warburgs, won the Eccles Prize as the Best Business Book of 1993. This biography of John D. Rockefeller, Sr., Titan, was a national bestseller and a National Book Critics Circle Award finalist. Other great biographies by Chernow include Alexander Hamilton, Grant, and Washington: A Life. I recommend them all! About the Book From the acclaimed, award-winning author of Alexander Hamilton: here is the essential, endlessly engrossing biography of John D. Rockefeller, Sr.—the Jekyll-and-Hyde of American capitalism. In the course of his nearly 98 years, Rockefeller was known as both a rapacious robber baron, whose Standard Oil Company rode roughshod over an industry, and a philanthropist who donated money lavishly to universities and medical centers. He was the terror of his competitors, the bogeyman of reformers, the delight of caricaturists—and an utter enigma. Drawing on unprecedented access to Rockefeller’s private papers, Chernow reconstructs his subjects’ troubled origins (his father was a swindler and a bigamist) and his single-minded pursuit of wealth. But he also uncovers the profound religiosity that drove him “to give all I could”; his devotion to his father; and the wry sense of humor that made him the country’s most colorful codger. Titan is a magnificent biography—balanced, revelatory, elegantly written. The Book’s ONE THING We study the lives of famous people who have impacted the world in order to better understand our own impact on the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Histories: Ives and Allied Families Arthur S
    Family Histories: Ives and Allied Families Arthur S. Ives 241 Cliff Ave. Pelham, N.Y. Re-typed into digital format in 2012 by Aleta Crawford, wife of Dr. James Crawford, great-grandson of Arthur Stanley Ives Arthur S. Ives: Family Histories 2 Index Surname Earliest Latest Named Married to Page Named Individual (number Individual of generations) Adams, John (1) to Celestia (9) Arthur Ives 24 Alden John(1) to Elizabeth (2) William Pabodie 38 Aldrich George (1) to Mattithiah (2) John Dunbar 40 Or Aldridge Allyn Robert (1) to Mary (2) Thomas Parke, Jr. 41 Andrews William (1) to Mary (5) Joseph Blakeslee 42 Atwater David (1) to Mary (3) Ebenezer Ives 45 Barker Edward (1) to Eunice (4) Capt. John Beadle 47 Barnes Thomas (1) to Deborah (3) Josiah Tuttle 50 Bassett William (1) to Hannah (5) Samuel Hitchcock 52 Beadle Samuel (1) to Eunice Amelia Julius Ives 59 (7) Benton Edward (1) to Mary (4) Samuel Thorpe 73 Bishop John (1) to Mary (2) George Hubbard 75 Blakeslee Samuel (1) to Merancy (6) Harry Beadle 76 Bliss Thomas (1) to Deliverance (3) David Perkins 104 Borden Richard (1) to Mary (2) John Cook 105 Bradley William (1) to Martha (2) Samuel Munson 107 Brockett John (1) to Abigail (2) John Paine 108 Buck Emanuell (1) to Elizabeth (4) Gideon Wright 109 Buck Henry (1) to Martha (2) Jonathan Deming 110 Burritt William (1) to Hannah (4) Titus Fowler 111 Bushnell Francis (1) to Elizabeth (3) Dea. William 112 Johnson Chauncey Charles (1) to Sarah (4) Israel Burritt 113 Churchill Josiah (1) to Elizabeth (2) Henry Buck 115 Churchill Josiah (1) to Sarah (2) Thomas Wickham 115 Clark John (1) to Sarah (4) Samuel Adams 116 Collier William (1) to Elizabeth (2) Constant 119 Southworth Collins Edward (1) to Sybil (2) Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Whither the Keiretsu, Japan's Business Networks? How Were They Structured? What Did They Do? Why Are They Gone?
    UC Berkeley Working Paper Series Title Whither the Keiretsu, Japan's Business Networks? How Were They Structured? What Did They Do? Why Are They Gone? Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/00m7d34g Authors Lincoln, James R. Shimotani, Masahiro Publication Date 2009-09-24 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California WHITHER THE KEIRETSU, JAPAN’S BUSINESS NETWORKS? How were they structured? What did they do? Why are they gone? James R. Lincoln Walter A. Haas School of Business University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720 USA ([email protected]) Masahiro Shimotani Faculty of Economics Fukui Prefectural University Fukui City, Japan ([email protected]) 1 INTRODUCTION The title of this volume and the papers that fill it concern business “groups,” a term suggesting an identifiable collection of actors (here, firms) within a clear-cut boundary. The Japanese keiretsu have been described in similar terms, yet compared to business groups in other countries the postwar keiretsu warrant the “group” label least. The prewar progenitor of the keiretsu, the zaibatsu, however, could fairly be described as groups, and, in their relatively sharp boundaries, hierarchical structure, family control, and close ties to the state were structurally similar to business groups elsewhere in the world. With the break-up by the U. S. Occupation of the largest member firms, the purging of their executives, and the outlawing of the holding company structure that held them together, the zaibatsu were transformed into quite different business entities, what we and other literature call “network forms” of organization (Podolny and Page, 1998; Miyajima, 1994).
    [Show full text]