DOCSLIB.ORG

Benton County Prairie Species Habitat Conservation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Benton County Prairie Species Habitat Conservation Plan BENTON COUNTY PRAIRIE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN DECEMBER 2010 For more information, please contact: Benton County Natural Areas & Parks Department 360 SW Avery Ave. Corvallis, Oregon 97333-1192 Phone: 541.766.6871 - Fax: 541.766.6891 http://www.co.benton.or.us/parks/hcp This document was prepared for Benton County by staff at the Institute for Applied Ecology: Tom Kaye Carolyn Menke Michelle Michaud Rachel Schwindt Lori Wisehart The Institute for Applied Ecology is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization whose mission is to conserve native ecosystems through restoration, research, and education. P.O. Box 2855 Corvallis, OR 97339-2855 (541) 753-3099 www.appliedeco.org Suggested Citation: Benton County. 2010. Prairie Species Habitat Conservation Plan. 160 pp plus appendices. www.co.benton.or.us/parks/hcp Front cover photos, top to bottom: Kincaid’s lupine, photo by Tom Kaye Nelson’s checkermallow, photo by Tom Kaye Fender’s blue butterfly, photo by Cheryl Schultz Peacock larkspur, photo by Lori Wisehart Bradshaw’s lomatium, photo by Tom Kaye Taylor’s checkerspot, photo by Dana Ross Willamette daisy, photo by Tom Kaye Benton County Prairie Species HCP Preamble The Benton County Prairie Species Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) was initiated to bring Benton County’s activities on its own lands into compliance with the Federal and State Endangered Species Acts. Federal law requires a non-federal landowner who wishes to conduct activities that may harm (“take”) threatened or endangered wildlife on their land to obtain an incidental take permit from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State law requires a non-federal public landowner who wishes to conduct activities that may harm threatened or endangered plants to obtain a permit from the Oregon Department of Agriculture. To receive an incidental take permit, a landowner must develop a HCP or Plan. Without this Plan, the County would not be able to continue its routine responsibilities, including road maintenance, without delays and added costs from habitat surveys and regulatory agency consultations prior to each action. With the HCP, the County will avoid and minimize impacts to threatened and endangered species of prairie habitats, but where impacts are unavoidable, the County will mitigate (complete habitat restoration to offset habitat damage) as required. During HCP development the County also fully recognized its own liability in issuing construction permits to rural private landowners in endangered butterfly habitat. The County also realized the liability and added burden that those landowners face when completing construction of a home, outbuilding, farm or forest structure on their property. Without an HCP, the County would be unable to issue building permits in endangered butterfly habitat until the landowner had received authorization from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This authorization would involve having a butterfly habitat survey completed in May or June, and if habitat were present the landowner would either have to avoid the habitat, or complete their own HCP and any mitigation required. Waiting for the survey season and completing a survey, developing a HCP, and completing mitigation would frequently delay and add significant cost to a project. To reduce the burden to private landowners, the Benton County Board of Commissioners decided to offer HCP coverage, through this HCP, as an option to rural private landowners in endangered butterfly habitat. If landowners elect to use this coverage, it eliminates the requirement that they complete a survey, develop their own HCP, or complete or fund their own mitigation. Because the County already manages more than 1,100 acres of natural areas, including over 150 acres of prairie habitat, it can efficiently incorporate the required mitigation into its management of large and protected sites with existing habitat. This HCP helps the County and its citizens comply with endangered species regulations while protecting at-risk species through long-term planning, avoiding and minimizing impacts, and mitigating for losses. i Benton County Prairie Species HCP Acknowledgments This Habitat Conservation Plan is the result of collaboration among numerous individuals and organizations working to conserve prairie habitats in the Benton County. We appreciate the considerable time and effort expended by each individual in providing technical expertise, foresight, and/or community stewardship in the preparation of this HCP. The project relied on individuals sharing their knowledge about prairie habitats and the Covered Species dependent on these habitats for their survival. We would like to thank the Technical Advisory committee members and we hope these individuals will continue to provide Benton County with support as the County moves forward with implementation of the Habitat Conservation Plan. We wish to acknowledge the time, commitment, and resources of a major group that assisted in the development of the Habitat Conservation Plan – the Stakeholder Advisory Committee. This committee provided the HCP Planning Team with insight and direction in the development of the HCP. We are grateful for their dedication and participation in this important process. Without the assistance of Benton County staff members we would not have been able to complete the Plan. We would especially like to thank Laurie Starha, Al Kitzman, Mary Simpson, Jon Stratton, Doug Sackinger, Andrew Monaco and Lisa Grisham. We also wish to thank all those community members who participated at public meetings so far and who provided invaluable comments on the process to date. We wish to thank the ESRI Conservation Program for a generous GIS software grant that allowed us to create the maps for this project. Finally, we wish to thank the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for providing a majority of the necessary funding needed for this project through the issuance of two USFWS Section 6 Habitat Conservation Planning Assistance Grants. ii Benton County Prairie Species HCP Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ..................................................................................... 5 1.3 Goals........................................................................................................ 6 1.4 Proposed Action ........................................................................................ 7 1.4.0 Scope................................................................................................. 7 1.4.0.0 Covered Entities and Lands ........................................................... 7 1.4.0.1 Covered Species ........................................................................... 7 1.4.0.2 Covered Activities ......................................................................... 8 1.4.0.3 Biological Goals and Conservation Measures ................................... 8 1.4.0.4 Prairie Conservation Strategy......................................................... 9 1.4.0.5 Reducing Disincentives for Conservation on Private Lands................ 9 1.4.0.6 Term of Incidental Take Permit.................................................... 12 1.5 Overview of Conservation Planning Process ............................................... 12 1.5.0 Introduction ..................................................................................... 12 1.5.1 Evaluation Process ............................................................................ 12 1.5.2 County Board of Commissioners ......................................................... 12 1.5.3 Habitat Conservation Planning Team .................................................. 15 1.5.4 Technical Advisory Committee............................................................ 15 1.5.5 Stakeholder Advisory Committee ........................................................ 15 1.5.6 Public Outreach ................................................................................ 16 1.5.7 Public Meetings................................................................................. 16 1.5.8 Data Collection ................................................................................. 16 1.5.8.0 Botanical Surveys ....................................................................... 16 1.5.8.1 Streaked Horned Lark Surveys..................................................... 17 1.5.8.2 Butterfly Surveys ........................................................................ 17 1.6 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................. 18 1.6.0 Federal Endangered Species Act......................................................... 18 1.6.0.0 The Section 10(a)(1)(B) Process - Habitat Conservation Plan Requirements and Guidelines....................................................................... 19 1.6.1 National Environmental Policy Act....................................................... 20 1.6.2 National Historic Preservation Act ....................................................... 20 1.6.3 Oregon Endangered Species Act......................................................... 20 1.6.4 Other Introductory or Background Topics as Appropriate...................... 21 2 Covered Species ................................................................................................ 22 2.1 Fender’s blue
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Calochortus Flexuosus S. Watson (Winding Mariposa Lily): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Calochortus flexuosus S. Watson (winding mariposa lily): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project July 24, 2006 Susan Spackman Panjabi and David G. Anderson Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO Peer Review Administered by Center for Plant Conservation Panjabi, S.S. and D.G. Anderson. (2006, July 24). Calochortus flexuosus S. Watson (winding mariposa lily): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/calochortusflexuosus.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was facilitated by the helpfulness and generosity of many experts, particularly Leslie Stewart, Peggy Fiedler, Marilyn Colyer, Peggy Lyon, Lynn Moore, and William Jennings. Their interest in the project and time spent answering questions were extremely valuable, and their insights into the distribution, habitat, and ecology of Calochortus flexuosus were crucial to this project. Thanks also to Greg Hayward, Gary Patton, Jim Maxwell, Andy Kratz, and Joy Bartlett for assisting with questions and project management. Thanks to Kimberly Nguyen for her work on the layout and for bringing this assessment to Web publication. Jane Nusbaum and Barbara Brayfield provided crucial financial oversight. Peggy Lyon and Marilyn Colyer provided valuable insights based on their experiences with C. flexuosus. Leslie Stewart provided information specific to the San Juan Resource Area of the Bureau of Land Management, including the Canyons of the Ancients National Monument. Annette Miller provided information on C. flexuosusseed storage status. Drs. Ron Hartman and Ernie Nelson provided access to specimens of C.
    [Show full text]
  • View Plant List Here
    11th annual Theodore Payne Native Plant Garden Tour planT list garden 2 in mid-city provided by homeowner Botanical Name Common Name Acalypha californica California Copperleaf Achillea millefolium Yarrow Achillea millefolium var rosea ‘Island Pink’ Island Pink Yarrow Adiantum jordanii California Maidenhair Fern Agave deserti Desert Agave Allium crispum Wild Onion Allium falcifolium Scythe Leaf Onion Allium haematochiton Red Skinned Onion Allium howellii var. clokeyi Mt. Pinos Onion Allium unifolium Single Leaf Onion Anemopsis californica Yerba Mansa Aquilegia formosa Western Columbine Arabis blepharophylla ‘Spring Charm’ Spring Charm Coast Rock Cress Arbutus menziesii Madrone Arctostaphylos ‘Baby Bear’ Baby Bear Manzanita Arctostaphylos ‘Emerald Carpet’ Emerald Carpet Manzanita Arctostaphylos ‘Howard McMinn’ Howard McMinn Manzanita Arctostaphylos bakeri ‘Louis Edmunds’ Louis Edmunds Manzanita Arctostaphylos densiflora ‘Sentinel’ Sentinel Manzanita Arctostaphylos glauca Big Berry Manzanita Arctostaphylos hookeri ‘Monterey Carpet’ Monterey Carpet Manzanita Arctostaphylos hookeri ‘Wayside’ Wayside Manzanita Arctostaphylos manzanita ‘Byrd Hill’ Byrd Hill Manzanita Arctostaphylos manzanita ‘Dr. Hurd’ Dr. Hurd Manzanita Arctostaphylos viscida Whiteleaf Manzanita Aristida purpurea Purple Three Awn Armeria maritima ‘Rubrifolia’ Rubrifolia Sea Thrift Artemisia californica California Sagebrush Artemisia californica ‘Canyon Grey’ Canyon Grey California Sagebrush Artemisia ludoviciana Silver Wormwood Artemisia pycnocephala ‘David’s Choice’ David’s
    [Show full text]
  • Euphorbia Subg
    ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОЕ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ БЮДЖЕТНОЕ УЧРЕЖДЕНИЕ НАУКИ БОТАНИЧЕСКИЙ ИНСТИТУТ ИМ. В.Л. КОМАРОВА РОССИЙСКОЙ АКАДЕМИИ НАУК На правах рукописи Гельтман Дмитрий Викторович ПОДРОД ESULA РОДА EUPHORBIA (EUPHORBIACEAE): СИСТЕМА, ФИЛОГЕНИЯ, ГЕОГРАФИЧЕСКИЙ АНАЛИЗ 03.02.01 — ботаника ДИССЕРТАЦИЯ на соискание ученой степени доктора биологических наук САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГ 2015 2 Оглавление Введение ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Глава 1. Род Euphorbia и основные проблемы его систематики ......................................... 9 1.1. Общая характеристика и систематическое положение .......................................... 9 1.2. Краткая история таксономического изучения и формирования системы рода ... 10 1.3. Основные проблемы систематики рода Euphorbia и его подрода Esula на рубеже XX–XXI вв. и пути их решения ..................................................................................... 15 Глава 2. Материал и методы исследования ........................................................................... 17 Глава 3. Построение системы подрода Esula рода Euphorbia на основе молекулярно- филогенетического подхода ...................................................................................................... 24 3.1. Краткая история молекулярно-филогенетического изучения рода Euphorbia и его подрода Esula ......................................................................................................... 24 3.2. Результаты молекулярно-филогенетического
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 9-17-2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park" (2018). Botanical Studies. 85. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/85 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE REDWOOD NATIONAL & STATE PARKS James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State Univerity Arcata, California 14 September 2018 The Redwood National and State Parks are located in Del Norte and Humboldt counties in coastal northwestern California. The national park was F E R N S established in 1968. In 1994, a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation added Del Norte Coast, Prairie Creek, Athyriaceae – Lady Fern Family and Jedediah Smith Redwoods state parks to form a single administrative Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosporum • northwestern lady fern unit. Together they comprise about 133,000 acres (540 km2), including 37 miles of coast line. Almost half of the remaining old growth redwood forests Blechnaceae – Deer Fern Family are protected in these four parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Propagation Protocol for ​Camassia Quamash ESRM 412
    Plant Propagation Protocol for Camassia quamash ​ ESRM 412 - Native Plant Production Spring 2020 Figure 1 Photo by Gary A Monroe from CalPhotos. Web. 6 May 2020 Figure 2 Plants Database. Camassia quamash. USDA, n.d. Web. Figure 3 Plants Database. Camassia quamash. USDA, n.d. Web. 6 May 2020. 6 May 2020. North American Distribution Washington Distribution TAXONOMY Plant Family Scientific Name Liliaceae1 ​ Common Name Lily family1 ​ Species Scientific Name Scientific Name Camassia quamash (Pursh) Greene1 ​ ​ Varieties No information found Sub-species Camassia quamash ssp. azurea (A. Heller) Gould – ​ small camas Camassia quamash ssp. breviflora Gould – small ​ camas Camassia quamash ssp. intermedia Gould – small ​ camas Camassia quamash ssp. linearis Gould – small ​ camas Camassia quamash ssp. maxima Gould – small ​ camas Camassia quamash ssp. quamash (Pursh) Greene – ​ small camas Camassia quamash ssp. utahensis Gould – Utah ​ small camas Camassia quamash ssp. walpolei (Piper) Gould – ​ Walpole's small camas2 ​ Cultivar No information found Common Synonym(s) Camassia esculenta Lindl. ​ Camassia quamash (Pursh) Greene subsp. teapeae ​ (H. St. John) H. St. John Camassia quamash (Pursh) Greene var. azurea (A. ​ Heller) C.L. Hitchc. Camassia quamash (Pursh) Greene var. breviflora ​ (Gould) C.L. Hitchc. Camassia quamash (Pursh) Greene var. intermedia ​ (Gould) C.L. Hitchc. Camassia quamash (Pursh) Greene var. linearis ​ (Gould) J.T. Howell Camassia quamash (Pursh) Greene var. maxima ​ (Gould) B. Boivin Camassia quamash (Pursh) Greene var. quamash ​ Camassia quamash (Pursh) Greene var. utahensis ​ (Gould) C.L. Hitchc. Quamassia quamash (Pursh) Coville4 ​ ​ Common Names Southern Lushootseed (Coast Salish Language) for camas: blue camas, crow potato, Camassia spp.: c̕ábid. camas, Camassia quamash, C. leichtinii: qʷəɬúʔəl. camas roots that are processed and dried: s√x̌əʤəb.
    [Show full text]
  • DCDB: an Updated On-Line Database of Chromosome Numbers of Tribe Delphinieae (Ranunculaceae)
    DCDB: an updated on-line database of chromosome numbers of tribe Delphinieae (Ranunculaceae) Maria Bosch1, Joan Simon1, Jordi López-Pujol2 & Cèsar Blanché1 1BioC-GReB, Laboratori de Botànica, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Barcelona. Av. Joan XXIII s/n. 08028 Barcelona, Catalonia (Spain) 2BioC-GReB, Botanic Institute of Barcelona (IBB-CSIC-ICUB). Passeig del Migdia s/n. 08028 Barcelona, Catalonia (Spain) VERSION 2.0 UPDATED 23/IV/2016 Abstract. A new version of the earlier chromosome database of tribe Delphinieae (Simon, J., M. Bosch, J. Molero & C. Blanché. 1999. A conspect of chromosome numbers in tribe Delphinieae (Ranunculaceae). Biodiversity Electronic Publications, 1 [Available online at http://hdl.handle.net/2445/95875]) is presented, after an accurate extensive literature and Internet survey, by adding the chromosome counts for the genera Aconitum L. (including Gymnaconitum (Stapf) Wei Wang & Z. D. Chen), Delphinium L. (including Staphisagria Spach), Consolida (DC.) S.F. Gray and Aconitella Spach, accumulated in the last 17 years. A total number of 2598 reports are presented, belonging to 389 species, representing a 44.5% of the total species number of the tribe (an increase of c. 137% compared with the 1097 reports gathered in the 1999 version). This increase is due both to chromosome research progress (analysed as counts/year) and an improved information capture system (including checking of populations location through Cyrillic alphabet, and Japanese and Chinese writing systems). Additionally, recent taxonomic advances, synonimization and new phylogenetic criteria have also been taken in account. The main basic number x = 8 is found at 2x, 3x, 4x, 5x, 6x, and 8x ploidy levels, whereas x = 9 is much rarer.
    [Show full text]
  • Bald Hill Farm Management Plan
    Bald Hill Farm Management Plan November 25, 2014 Bald Hill Farm Management Plan Greenbelt Land Trust 101 SW Western Blvd. Corvallis, Oregon 97333 541-752-9609 www.greenbeltlandtrust.org Prepared by Jeff Krueger Environments LLC in conjunc on with Greenbelt Land Trust OWEB Grant Number: 212-101 BPA Tract ID: WILWF-WL-7 November 25, 2014 Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction and Background............................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Management Plan Purpose and Timeframe ........................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Acquisition History and Ownership ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Site Overview, Landscape Context, and Ecological Significance .......................................................................... 2 1.5 The Vision of Bald Hill Farm Conservation Area .................................................................................................. 5 1.6 Bald Hill Farm Conservation Easements .............................................................................................................. 6 1.6.1 BPA Conservation Easement .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Priority Plant and Animal Species in Oregon Forests
    A GUIDE TO Priority Plant and Animal Species IN OREGON FORESTS A publication of the Oregon Forest Resources Institute Sponsors of the first animal and plant guidebooks included the Oregon Department of Forestry, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Oregon State University and the Oregon State Implementation Committee, Sustainable Forestry Initiative. This update was made possible with help from the Northwest Habitat Institute, the Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University and Oregon State University. Acknowledgments: The Oregon Forest Resources Institute is grateful to the following contributors: Thomas O’Neil, Kathleen O’Neil, Malcolm Anderson and Jamie McFadden, Northwest Habitat Institute; the Integrated Habitat and Biodiversity Information System (IBIS), supported in part by the Northwest Power and Conservation Council and the Bonneville Power Administration under project #2003-072-00 and ESRI Conservation Program grants; Sue Vrilakas, Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Institute for Natural Resources; and Dana Sanchez, Oregon State University, Mark Gourley, Starker Forests and Mike Rochelle, Weyerhaeuser Company. Edited by: Fran Cafferata Coe, Cafferata Consulting, LLC. Designed by: Sarah Craig, Word Jones © Copyright 2012 A Guide to Priority Plant and Animal Species in Oregon Forests Oregonians care about forest-dwelling wildlife and plants. This revised and updated publication is designed to assist forest landowners, land managers, students and educators in understanding how forests provide habitat for different wildlife and plant species. Keeping forestland in forestry is a great way to mitigate habitat loss resulting from development, mining and other non-forest uses. Through the use of specific forestry techniques, landowners can maintain, enhance and even create habitat for birds, mammals and amphibians while still managing lands for timber production.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Herbaceous Plants in Our Gardens
    Native Herbaceous Plants in Our Gardens A Guide for the Willamette Valley Native Gardening Awareness Program A Committee of the Emerald Chapter of the Native Plant Society of Oregon Members of the Native Gardening Awareness Program, a committee of the Emerald chapter of the NPSO, contributed text, editing, and photographs for this publication. They include: Mieko Aoki, John Coggins, Phyllis Fisher, Rachel Foster, Evelyn Hess, Heiko Koester, Cynthia Lafferty, Danna Lytjen, Bruce Newhouse, Nick Otting, and Michael Robert Spring 2005 1 2 Table of Contents Native Herbaceous Plants in Our Gardens ...........................5 Shady Woodlands .................................................................7 Baneberry – Actaea rubra ................................................... 7 Broad-leaved Bluebells – Mertensia platyphylla .....................7 Hound’s-tongue – Cynoglossum grande ............................... 8 Broad-leaved Starflower –Trientalis latifolia ..........................8 Bunchberry – Cornus unalaschkensis (formerly C. canadensis) ....8 False Solomon’s-seal – Maianthemum racemosum ................ 9 Fawn Lily – Erythronium oregonum .........................................9 Ferns ..........................................................................10-12 Fringecup – Tellima grandiflora and T. odorata ..................... 12 Inside-out Flower – Vancouveria hexandra ....................... 13 Large-leaved Avens – Geum macrophyllum ...................... 13 Meadowrue – Thalictrum spp. ...............................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Horse Rock Ridge Douglas Goldenberg Eugene District BLM, 2890 Chad Drive, Eugene, OR 97408-7336
    Horse Rock Ridge Douglas Goldenberg Eugene District BLM, 2890 Chad Drive, Eugene, OR 97408-7336 Fine-grained basaltic dikes resistant to weathering protrude from the surrounding terrain in Horse Rock Ridge RNA. Photo by Cheshire Mayrsohn. he grassy balds of Horse Rock Ridge Research Natural Area defined by their dominant grass species: blue wildrye (Elymus glaucus), (RNA) are found on ridges and south-facing slopes within Oregon fescue (Festuca roemeri), and Lemmon’s needlegrass Tthe Douglas fir forest of the Coburg Hills. These natural (Achnatherum lemmonii)/hairy racomitrium moss (Racomitrium grasslands in the foothills of the Cascades bordering the southern canescens) (Curtis 2003). Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and Willamette Valley have fascinated naturalists with their contrast to western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) dominate the forest, with an the surrounding forests. The RNA was established to protect these understory of Cascade Oregon grape (Berberis nervosa), salal meadows which owe their existence to thin soils associated with (Gaultheria shallon), and creeping snowberry (Symphoricarpos mollis). rock outcroppings. Surrounding old growth forest adds to the value The 378-acre RNA is located in Linn County, Section 1 of the Natural Area. Township 15 South Range 2 West, on land administered by the The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) recognized the site’s BLM Eugene District. A portion of the meadow extends onto botanical, wildlife, and scenic values by establishing it as an RNA/ adjacent Weyerhaeuser private land. The Nature Conservancy has ACEC in June 1995 (Eugene District Resource Management Plan recently acquired a conservation easement on 45 acres of the Weyer- 1995). It had previously been established as an Area of Critical haeuser property, providing protection for the rocky bald and a Environmental Concern (ACEC) in 1984.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Clarkia Stewardship Acct8mar2002
    Stewardship Account for Clarkia purpurea ssp. quadrivulnera Prepared for the Garry Oak Ecosystems Recovery Team March 2002 by Brenda Costanzo, BC Conservation Data Centre, PO Box 9344 Station Provincial Government, Victoria, BC V8W 9M7 Funding provided by the Habitat Stewardship Program of the Government of Canada and the Nature Conservancy of Canada Clarkia purpurea ssp. quadrivulnera 2 STEWARDSHIP ACCOUNT Clarkia purpurea ssp. quadrivulnera Species information: Kingdom: Plantae Subkingdom: Tracheobionta Superdivision: Spermatophyta Division: Magnoliophyta Subclass: Rosidae Order: Myrtales Family: Onagraceae (Above classification is from U.S.D.A. Plants Database, 2001) Genus: Clarkia Species: purpurea Subspecies: quadrivulnera (Dougl. ex Lindl.) ex H.F. & M.E. Lewis Section Godetia (Lewis, 1955) Clarkia purpurea (Curtis) Nels. & Macbr. ssp. quadrivulnera (Dougl.) H. Lewis & M. Lewis; Small-flowered Godetia Synonyms: Clarkia quadrivulnera (Dougl.) ex Lindl. (Douglas et al., 2001) Clarkia quadrivulnera (Dougl. ex Lindl.) A. Nels. & J.F. Macbr. Godetia quadrivulnera var. vacensis Jepson Godetia purpurea (W. Curtis) G. Don var. parviflora (S. Wats.) C.L. Hitchc. Godetia quadrivulnera (Dougl. ex Lindl.) Spach (Above from ITIS data base, 2001; USDA Plants database, 2001) Oenothera quadrivulnera Douglas (GRIN database, 2001) Hitchcock and Jepson recognized two genera: Clarkia and Godetia based on petal shape The section Godetia consists of a diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid series, of which C. purpurea and C. prostrata is the latter (Lewis and Lewis, 1955). Lewis and Lewis (1955) felt that for Clarkia purpurea there were ephemeral local races due to hybridization. Some of these could be separated based on conspicuous morphological characters to the subspecies level. However, these subspecies were artificial and not distinct geographical nor ecological races.
    [Show full text]