Heritage Statement Former Quaker Chapel, Monyash, Derbyshire Dales
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Heritage Statement Former Quaker Chapel, Monyash, Derbyshire Dales Client: Mr Neil Gould Technical Report by: Dr Michael Nevell, Archaeology Consultant Report No: 2020/02 © Dr Michael Nevell: Heritage Statement: Former Quaker Chapel, Monyash, Derbyshire Dales, May 2020 Contents Summary 1 1. Introduction 2 2. Method Statement 3 3. Setting and Historical Background 5 5. Assessment of Significance 18 6. Proposed Works and Impact Assessment 43 7. Conclusion 47 8. Sources 48 9. Acknowledgements 50 © Dr Michael Nevell: Heritage Statement: Former Quaker Chapel, Monyash, Derbyshire Dales, May 2020 Summary In April 2020 Dr Michael Nevell, archaeology consultant, was commissioned by Mr Neil Gould to produce a Heritage Statement for the Quaker Chapel, Monyash, Derbyshire Dales, an area that is part of the Peak District National Park (centred on NGR SK 14993 66703). The Quaker Meeting house was built in the period 1711 to 1717 and documentary and structural evidence indicates that it was adapted from an earlier cottage/farmhouse on this site. The building is a Grade II listed heritage asset and is situated on the northern side of the village of Monyash on Chapel Street, within the conservation area. This document has been produced to support a Planning Application for the conversion of the former community building into an open market priced house. This document aims to provide sufficient heritage information to allow the Peak District National Park Authority to determine the application. The relative significance of the building has been considered with reference to the four areas of heritage values outlined by Historic England (formerly English Heritage) in their Conservation Principles Policies and Guidance, and the Secretary of State’s criteria for assessing the importance of national monuments. However, this heritage appraisal should be read in conjunction with the plans and other technical reports which together comprise the application. The results of the heritage appraisal have concluded that the impact of the proposed works would be overall minor. It is considered that the proposed domestic conversion has an overall minor impact on the existing fabric of the former Quaker Chapel. Most of the external impact is negligible in terms of visual impact, and elsewhere is minor. The internal impact is regarded over all as minor to moderate, with a new internal staircase inserted, an earlier staircase removed, a leanto building rebuilt and the insertion of a first floor over most of the former meeting space in G1. The impact on the overall historic fabric is minor, affecting little of the significant decorative/vernacular features except for the insertion of the first floor in room G1 which is considered a moderate impact. © Dr Michael Nevell: Heritage Statement: Former Quaker Chapel, Monyash, Derbyshire Dales, May 2020 1 1. Introduction 1.1 Planning Background The Quaker Chapel lies on Chapel Street in the village of Monyash (SK 14993 66703), Derbyshire Dales. It was originally built as a farmhouse/cottage and converted in the years 1711 to 1717. It is a Grade II listed and is situated on the northern side of the village of Monyash, within the conservation area (DHER 1498552). It lies within the Peak District National Park. This document has been produced to support a Planning Application for the conversion of the former community building into an open market priced house. The purpose of the Heritage Statement is to comply with the requirements of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF, February 2019) and the National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) in respect of heritage issues. This report sets out: • The relevant national and local heritage planning policies; • An historical background of the building, the site and surrounding area; • An appraisal of the historical significance of the building; • An assessment of the potential or actual impact of the proposed works on the significance of the building, surrounding heritage assets, including the nearby listed buildings. © Dr Michael Nevell: Heritage Statement: Former Quaker Chapel, Monyash, Derbyshire Dales, May 2020 2 2. Method Statement The principal objective of the heritage appraisal was to examine the history, development and significance of the building and through this to assess the impact of the proposed works on that significance. This was achieved by carrying out desk-based documentary research based on primary and secondary sources, including maps, drawings and reports. In addition, a visual inspection survey of the building and its environs was undertaken on 30 April 2020. The visual inspection was intended to provide the minimum of information needed to identify the building’s age, type, broad chronological development, and, crucially, significance; it was not intended to provide a detailed survey of the building. 2.1 Government and Local Planning Policies 2.1.1 National Planning Policy Framework The significance of the heritage resource identified within this report has been assessed as recommended in the revised National Planning Policy Framework (Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, February 2019). The NPPF sets out the Government’s planning policies and outlines the presumption in favour of sustainable development, which is defined by three principles: economic, social and environmental. Of the core planning principles underpinning decision making, conserving heritage assets ‘in a manner appropriate to their significance, so that they can be enjoyed for their contribution to the quality of life of existing and future generations’ is one. Section 16 specifically deals with this historic environment (paragraphs 184-202), and local planning authorities should consider: • the desirability of sustaining and enhancing the significance of heritage assets and putting them to viable uses consistent with their conservation; • the wider social, cultural, economic and environmental benefits that conservation of the historic environment can bring; • the desirability of new development making a positive contribution to local character and distinctiveness; and • opportunities to draw on the contribution made by the historic environment to the character of a place. Paragraph 189 states that local planning authorities, when determining applications, should require the applicant to describe the significance of any affected heritage assets, including any contribution made by their setting. ‘The level of detail should be proportionate to the assets’ importance and no more than is sufficient to understand the potential impact of the proposal on their significance. As a minimum the relevant historic environment record should have been consulted and the heritage assets assessed using appropriate expertise where necessary. Where a site on which development is proposed includes, or has the potential to include, heritage assets with archaeological interest, local planning authorities should require © Dr Michael Nevell: Heritage Statement: Former Quaker Chapel, Monyash, Derbyshire Dales, May 2020 3 developers to submit an appropriate desk-based assessment and, where necessary, a field evaluation’. Paragraph 196 states that where a development proposal will lead to less that substantial harm to the significance of a designated heritage asset, this harm should be weighed against the public benefits of the proposal including, where appropriate, securing its optimal viable use. Paragraph 199 states that local planning authorities should require developers to record and advance understanding of any heritage assets to be lost, in a manner appropriate to their importance and impact, and to make this evidence publicly accessible. 2.1.2 Local Development Framework NPPF outlines the need for local planning authorities to create local plans and frameworks to implement NPPF at a local level. The Peak District National Park adopted supplementary planning guidance on agricultural developments within the park in 2003 (PDNP 2003). In October 2011 the PDNP adopted a Local Development Framework Core Strategy. This stated in para 13.16 that: ‘Businesses are encouraged to re-use existing traditional buildings of historic or vernacular merit wherever possible. However, in line with national policy statements, more modern agricultural buildings may be re-used if development management criteria are satisfied. It may be possible to replace an existing building with a smaller new building, if siting and design can achieve enhancement. However, business use in existing or new isolated buildings in more remote areas of the countryside will not be permitted. Decisions will take full account of factors including the character of the surrounding landscape, the degree of separation from other buildings or settlements, and the nature of road access. Proposals to redevelop a business site or building in the open countryside for other uses are not likely to be acceptable unless enhancement can be achieved.’ Further guidance was provided in May 2019 when revised Development Management Policies were adopted. Pages 29 to 42 deal with the conservation and enhancing of cultural heritage assets within the Park (paras 3.43 to 3.48), including a section dealing with the identification of heritage assets and assessing the impact of development on designated and non-designated heritage assets and their settings (paras 3.49 to 3.65). Policies DMC5, DMC6, DMC7, DMC8 and DCM9 deal with the impact, respectively, of development on non-designated heritage assets, scheduled ancient monuments, listed buildings,