DOCSLIB.ORG

A Classification of Tasmanian Estuaries and Assessment of Their Conservation Significance Using Ecological and Physical Attributes, Population and Land Use

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Classification of Tasmanian Estuaries and Assessment of Their Conservation Significance Using Ecological and Physical Attributes, Population and Land Use ISSN 1441-8487 Number 2 A Classification of Tasmanian Estuaries and Assessment of their Conservation Significance using Ecological and Physical Attributes, Population and Land Use G.J. Edgar, N.S. Barrett and D.J. Graddon October 1999 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Entry Edgar, Graham, 1955- A Classification of Tasmanian Estuaries and Assessment of their Conservation Significance using Ecological and Physical Attributes, Population and Land Use Bibliography ISBN 0 7246 4754 6. 1. Estuaries-Tasmania. 2. Conservation-Ecology. I. Barrett, Neville, 1962 -. II. Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute. 597.5609946 Published by the Marine Research Laboratories - Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania 1999 Series Editor - Dr Caleb Gardner The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author/s and are not necessarily those of the Marine Research Laboratories or the Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................ 3 SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................................. 6 PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES OF TASMANIAN ESTUARIES ................................................................................... 6 BIOLOGICAL ATTRIBUTES OF TASMANIAN ESTUARIES ............................................................................... 6 THREATS TO ESTUARINE BIOTA ................................................................................................................. 7 ASSESSMENT OF THE CONSERVATION SIGNIFICANCE OF TASMANIAN ESTUARIES ...................................... 7 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................................ 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS......................................................................................................................... 12 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 13 1.1 CONTEXT .......................................................................................................................................... 13 1.2 AIMS ................................................................................................................................................. 14 1.3 DEFINING AN ESTUARY ..................................................................................................................... 15 1.3.1 Upstream limits of estuaries..................................................................................................... 16 1.3.2 Downstream limits of estuaries................................................................................................ 17 1.3.3 Lateral boundaries of estuaries................................................................................................. 17 1.3.4 Estuarine catchment areas........................................................................................................ 17 1.4 CHARACTERISTICS OF ESTUARIES ..................................................................................................... 17 1.4.1 Formation of estuaries.............................................................................................................. 17 1.4.2 Water flow in estuaries ............................................................................................................ 18 1.4.3 Classification of estuaries ........................................................................................................ 18 1.5 THE TASMANIAN ESTUARINE ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................... 19 1.5.1 Marine influences..................................................................................................................... 19 1.5.2 Freshwater influences .............................................................................................................. 19 1.5.3 Biota......................................................................................................................................... 20 1.6 HUMAN IMPACTS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT .................................................................................... 20 1.6.1 Catchment activities................................................................................................................. 20 1.6.2 Activities within estuaries........................................................................................................ 22 1.6.3 Eutrophication.......................................................................................................................... 22 1.6.4 Seagrass decline ....................................................................................................................... 23 1.6.5 Introduced marine and estuarine species.................................................................................. 23 1.6.6 Long-term climate change ....................................................................................................... 24 1.6.7 Management issues relating to estuaries .................................................................................. 24 2. DATA SETS, SAMPLING METHODS AND ANALYSIS............................................................... 26 2.1 CRITERIA FOR SELECTING ESTUARIES .............................................................................................. 26 2.2 GEOMORPHOLOGICAL CLASSES AND TIDAL DATA ........................................................................... 26 2.3 GIS PROCEDURES ............................................................................................................................. 26 2.4 CATCHMENT BOUNDARIES AND WATER DIVERSIONS ....................................................................... 27 2.4.1 Determination of catchment boundaries .................................................................................. 28 2.4.2 Sources of error........................................................................................................................ 28 2.4.3 Transcription errors.................................................................................................................. 29 2.4.4 Estuary boundaries................................................................................................................... 29 2.4.5 Regulation of water flow and diversions in Tasmanian catchments ........................................29 2.5 RAINFALL AND RUNOFF DATA .......................................................................................................... 31 2.6 GEOLOGICAL DATA .......................................................................................................................... 32 2.7 POPULATION STATISTICS .................................................................................................................. 34 2.8 LAND TENURE DATA ........................................................................................................................ 35 2.9 SATELLITE DERIVED LANDTYPE DATA ............................................................................................. 36 2.9.1 Limitations of satellite-derived landtype classification............................................................ 37 2.9.2 Calculating a Naturalness Index............................................................................................... 37 2.10 HYDROLOGICAL DATA .................................................................................................................... 38 2.11 MACROINVERTEBRATE AND PLANT DATA ...................................................................................... 39 2.11.1 Sites examined ....................................................................................................................... 39 2.11.2 Sampling methods.................................................................................................................. 43 2.11.3 Sediment analysis................................................................................................................... 43 2.11.4 Taxonomic uncertainty .......................................................................................................... 43 2.11.5 Estimation of faunal biomass and productivity...................................................................... 43 2.12 FISH DATA ...................................................................................................................................... 44 2.13 STATISTICAL ANALYSES ................................................................................................................. 45 2.13.1 Variance estimates ................................................................................................................. 45 2.13.2 Associations between physical and biological variables........................................................ 47 2.13.3 Multivariate analyses ............................................................................................................. 47 3. RESULTS.............................................................................................................................................. 49 3.1 PHYSICAL
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conservation of Handfish and Their Habitats – Annual Report Tim Lynch, Tyson Bessell, Alexander Hormann, Carlie Devine and Neville Barrett
    Conservation of handfish and their habitats – annual report Tim Lynch, Tyson Bessell, Alexander Hormann, Carlie Devine and Neville Barrett Project A10 – Conservation of spotted handfish 28 February 2019 Milestone 4– Research Plan 4 (2018) www.nespmarine.edu.au Enquiries should be addressed to: Dr Tim P. Lynch Senior Research Scientist CSIRO Castray Esplanade [email protected] Project Leader’s Distribution List Derwent Estuary Program Ursula Taylor Zoo and Aquarium Association (ZAA) Craig Thorburn Natural Resource Management (NRM) Nepelle Crane South MAST Ian Ross Royal Yacht Club of Tasmania Nick Hutton Derwent Sailing Squadron Shaun Tiedemann The Handfish Recovery Team (HRT) See list below Marine and Freshwater Species Conservation Section Wildlife, Heritage and Marine Division Department of the Environment and Energy (DoEE) Threatened Species Policy and Andrew Crane Conservation Advice Branch Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (DPIPWE) Office of the Threatened Species Commissioner (DoEE) The project will also report its findings on a semi-annual basis to the National Handfish Recovery Team (NHRT) – see below. This is a governance body that is constituted between the Tasmanian State and the Commonwealth government with other interested parties: Department of the Environment and Energy (Commonwealth) Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Andrew Crane Environment (Tas) CSIRO scientist, running current surveys and substrate trials Tim Lynch (Chair) University of Tasmania, handfish research Neville
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Need to Be Changed at All)
    (v.1 Please let me know if the minutes need to be changed at all) Kevin Turner RDA Tasmania Mobile: 0419395178 Email: [email protected] MINUTES Local Government Economic Development Network Thursday 28th August 2020 Online via Zoom 2pm to 4pm Attendees Thanks to the 28 who attended and welcome to those joined for the first time: Adriaan Stander (Kingborough Council: Strategic Planner), Bill Duhig (Skills Tasmania: Project Manager), Bruce Williams (City of Launceston: Economic Development Officer), Carol Bracken (Cradle Coast Authority: Program Manager - Regional Futures Plan), Carolyn Coates (Hobart City Council: International Relations | Economic Development, Engagement and Strategy | Community Life), Craig Perkins (RDA Tasmania: Chief Executive Officer & Director Regional Development), Erin McGoldrick (Glenorchy City Council: Manager City Strategy and Economic Development), Fiona Ranson (City of Launceston: Urban Design & Heritage Planner), Jackie Harvey (State Growth: Project Manager), Jaime Parsons (City of Launceston: Team Leader Place Making, Liveable Communities), Jane Eldershaw (State Growth: Project Manager Antarctic Tasmania and Regional Coordination), Jen Newman (RDA Tasmania: Regional Development Coordinator), Kevin Turner (RDA Tasmania: Regional Development Coordinator), Linda Seeborn (Skills Tasmania: Manager, Workforce Policy and Programs), Lucy Knot (Hobart City Council: Economic Development Project Officer), Luke Doyle (Hobart City Council: Manager Economic Development, Engagement and Strategy), Marilyn
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Impacts of Shared Parasites on Fitness Components Among Competing Hosts
    Received: 23 November 2016 | Revised: 13 April 2017 | Accepted: 19 April 2017 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3062 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Differential impacts of shared parasites on fitness components among competing hosts Olwyn C. Friesen | Robert Poulin | Clément Lagrue Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand Abstract Effects of parasites on individual hosts can eventually translate to impacts on host Correspondence Olwyn C. Friesen, Department of Zoology, communities. In particular, parasitism can differentially affect host fitness among sym- University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. patric and interacting host species. We examined whether the impact of shared para- Email: [email protected] sites varied among host species within the same community. Specifically, we looked at Funding information the impacts of the acanthocephalan Acanthocephalus galaxii, the trematodes Department of Zoology, University of Otago Coitocaecum parvum and Maritrema poulini, and the nematode Hedruris spinigera, on three host species: the amphipods, Paracalliope fluviatilis and Paracorophium excava- tum, and the isopod, Austridotea annectens. We assessed parasite infection levels in the three host species and tested for effects on host survival, behavior, probability of pairing, and fecundity. Maritrema poulini and C. parvum were most abundant in P. exca- vatum but had no effect on its survival, whereas they negatively affected the survival of P. fluviatilis, the other amphipod. Female amphipods carrying young had higher M. poulini and C. parvum abundance than those without, yet the number of young car- ried was not linked to parasite abundance. Behavior of the isopod A. annectens was affected by M. poulini infection; more heavily infected individuals were more active. Paracorophium excavatum moved longer distances when abundance of C.
    [Show full text]
  • ^% So STATUS of EULIMA SUBCARINATA ORBIGNY, 1842 ANDE CAROLIIDALL, 1889(GASTROPODA: MELANELLIDAE)1
    Vol. 92 (2) April 27, 1978 The Nautilus 79 ^% S o % ‘ 4 . w * 4 ’S STATUS OF EULIMA SUBCARINATA ORBIGNY, 1842 AN DE CAROLIIDALL, 1889(GASTROPODA: MELANELLIDAE)1 William G. Lyons Florida Department of Natural Resources Marine Research Laboratory St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 ABSTRACT Eulima subcarinata Orbigny, 184.2, is redescribed and transferred to the genus Eulimostraca Bartsch, 1917. The species occurs from the Caribbean and Yucatan to intermediate-depth shelf waters off Florida and North Carolina. Confusion regard­ ing the species’ identity is discussed. Eulima carolii Dali, 1889 (formerly affinis C. B. Adams, 1850, non Philippi, 1844) is considered nomen a dubium. Orbigny (1842) introduced the name Eulima of typical, unornamented melanellid form but subcarinata for a small melanellid from with a peripheral line suggesting a low carina on Guadeloupe, West Indies. Among the characters the last whorl. included in his Latin description (1845) were “an- Mörch (1875) reported the species from St. fractibus octonis. linea fulva omatis, ultimo Thomas [Virgin Islands]; and Dali (1889a) ex­ subcarinato”, expanded in French (1853) as “le tended the range to the southeastern United dernier [tour] un peu caréné en avant. States.. No subsequent records have appeared, Couleur. Blanc uniforme avec une légère bande although the name has been continuously used in jaunâtre ou fauve sur la partie caréneé an­compilation lists of western Atlantic marine térieure.” His illustrations (1842, pi. XVI, Figs. mollusks. 4-6) were somewhat schematic, depicting a shell I recently examined the holotype of Eulima 1 Contribution no. 316, Florida Department of Natural subcarinata, presently in the British Museum of Resources, Marine Research Laboratory.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Reference Module Summary Report LR22
    Laboratory Reference Module Summary Report Benthic Invertebrate Component - 2017/18 LR22 26 March 2018 Author: Tim Worsfold Reviewer: David Hall, NMBAQCS Project Manager Approved by: Myles O'Reilly, Contract Manager, SEPA Contact: [email protected] MODULE / EXERCISE DETAILS Module: Laboratory Reference (LR) Exercises: LR22 Data/Sample Request Circulated: 10th July 2017 Sample Submission Deadline: 31st August 2017 Number of Subscribing Laboratories: 7 Number of LR Received: 4 Contents Table 1. Summary of mis-identified taxa in the Laboratory Reference module (LR22) (erroneous identifications in brackets). Table 2. Summary of identification policy differences in the Laboratory Reference Module (LR22) (original identifications in brackets). Appendix. LR22 individual summary reports for participating laboratories. Table 1. Summary of mis-identified taxa in the Laboratory Reference Module (LR22) (erroneous identifications in brackets). Taxonomic Major Taxonomic Group LabCode Edits Polychaeta Oligochaeta Crustacea Mollusca Other Spio symphyta (Spio filicornis ) - Leucothoe procera (Leucothoe ?richardii ) - - Scolelepis bonnieri (Scolelepis squamata ) - - - - BI_2402 5 Laonice (Laonice sarsi ) - - - - Dipolydora (Dipolydora flava ) - - - - Goniada emerita (Goniadella bobrezkii ) - Nebalia reboredae (Nebalia bipes ) - - Polydora sp. A (Polydora cornuta ) - Diastylis rathkei (Diastylis cornuta ) - - BI_2403 7 Syllides? (Anoplosyllis edentula ) - Abludomelita obtusata (Tryphosa nana ) - in mixture - - Spirorbinae (Ditrupa arietina ) - - - -
    [Show full text]
  • WMSDB - Worldwide Mollusc Species Data Base
    WMSDB - Worldwide Mollusc Species Data Base Family: TURBINIDAE Author: Claudio Galli - [email protected] (updated 07/set/2015) Class: GASTROPODA --- Clade: VETIGASTROPODA-TROCHOIDEA ------ Family: TURBINIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 (Sea) - Alphabetic order - when first name is in bold the species has images Taxa=681, Genus=26, Subgenus=17, Species=203, Subspecies=23, Synonyms=411, Images=168 abyssorum , Bolma henica abyssorum M.M. Schepman, 1908 aculeata , Guildfordia aculeata S. Kosuge, 1979 aculeatus , Turbo aculeatus T. Allan, 1818 - syn of: Epitonium muricatum (A. Risso, 1826) acutangulus, Turbo acutangulus C. Linnaeus, 1758 acutus , Turbo acutus E. Donovan, 1804 - syn of: Turbonilla acuta (E. Donovan, 1804) aegyptius , Turbo aegyptius J.F. Gmelin, 1791 - syn of: Rubritrochus declivis (P. Forsskål in C. Niebuhr, 1775) aereus , Turbo aereus J. Adams, 1797 - syn of: Rissoa parva (E.M. Da Costa, 1778) aethiops , Turbo aethiops J.F. Gmelin, 1791 - syn of: Diloma aethiops (J.F. Gmelin, 1791) agonistes , Turbo agonistes W.H. Dall & W.H. Ochsner, 1928 - syn of: Turbo scitulus (W.H. Dall, 1919) albidus , Turbo albidus F. Kanmacher, 1798 - syn of: Graphis albida (F. Kanmacher, 1798) albocinctus , Turbo albocinctus J.H.F. Link, 1807 - syn of: Littorina saxatilis (A.G. Olivi, 1792) albofasciatus , Turbo albofasciatus L. Bozzetti, 1994 albofasciatus , Marmarostoma albofasciatus L. Bozzetti, 1994 - syn of: Turbo albofasciatus L. Bozzetti, 1994 albulus , Turbo albulus O. Fabricius, 1780 - syn of: Menestho albula (O. Fabricius, 1780) albus , Turbo albus J. Adams, 1797 - syn of: Rissoa parva (E.M. Da Costa, 1778) albus, Turbo albus T. Pennant, 1777 amabilis , Turbo amabilis H. Ozaki, 1954 - syn of: Bolma guttata (A. Adams, 1863) americanum , Lithopoma americanum (J.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecotoxicology of Estuarine Amphipod Paracorophium Excavatum
    E icolo fEstua ·ne Amphipod Paracorophium excavatum A thesis Submitted in partial fulfilment the requirements for Degree of Master of Science in Environmental Science at The University of Canterbury by Carol Wong Hee Ting University of Canterbury 1999 ABSTRACT The estuarine tube dwelling amphipod Paracorophium excavatum was investigated for its suitability as a bio-indicator and bio-monitor. Distribution patterns of P. excavatum were determined at 13 sites in the Canterbury region that differed in particle size distribution ranging from sandy to muddy sediment, with overall10w organic content. Low tide salinity ranged from 5 to 33 0/00 between sites and sediment moisture content ranged between 23 to 41 % moisture. Amphipods were absent from most sites within the Avon-Heathcote Estuary. The availability, life history and fecundity of P. excavatum were compared from intertidal mudflat sites in Brooklands Lagoon and Kairaki over a period of thirteen months. Four sediment core samples were collected at monthly intervals and P. excavatum IS population structure and life history pattern studied. The life history til· <: of P. excavatum can be characterised bY fast-growing, annual, iteroporous, bivoltine, females ovigerous throughout the year and thelygenous (female biased) population. P. excavatum showed relative consistency in abundance throughout the year with monthly densities ranging from 875.79 per 0.1 m-2 (July) to 1754.77 per 0.1 m-2 (December) at Brooklands Lagoon and 1031.83 per 0.1 m2 (November) to 1780.24 per 0.1 m2 (December) at Kairaki. There was a linear relationship between numbers of eggs per female and female length.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Development Information to Accompany
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TO ACCOMPANY DRAFT AMENDMENT NO.6 TO D’ENTRECASTEAUX CHANNEL MARINE FARMING DEVELOPMENT PLAN FEBRUARY 2002 PROPONENT: TASSAL OPERATIONS PTY LTD Glossary ADCP Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler AGD Amoebic Gill Disease ASC Aquaculture Stewardship Council BAP Best Aquaculture Practices BEMP Broadscale Environmental Monitoring Program CAMBA China-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement CEO Chief Executive Officer COBP Code of Best Practice CSER corporate, social and environmental responsibility CSIRO Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation DAFF Depart of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry dBA A-weighted decibels DMB Dry matter basis DO dissolved oxygen DPIW Department of Primary Industries and Water DPIPWE Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and the Environment EDO Environmental Defenders Office ENGOs environmental non-governmental organisations EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMS Environmental Management System EPA Environmental Protection Authority EPBCA Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 FCR Feed Conversion Ratio FHMP Fish Health Management Plan FSANZ Food Standards Australia New Zealand g gram GAA Global Aquaculture Alliance ha hectare HAB Harmful Algal Bloom HOG head on gutted HVN Huon Valley News IALA International Association of Lighthouse Authorities IMAS Institute of Marine and Antarctic Studies i JAMBA Japan-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement kg kilogram km kilometre L litre LED light-emitting diode m metre mm millimetre MAST Marine and Safety
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Marine Gastropods Around Tarapur Atomic Power Station (TAPS), West Coast of India Ambekar AA1*, Priti Kubal1, Sivaperumal P2 and Chandra Prakash1
    www.symbiosisonline.org Symbiosis www.symbiosisonlinepublishing.com ISSN Online: 2475-4706 Research Article International Journal of Marine Biology and Research Open Access Checklist of Marine Gastropods around Tarapur Atomic Power Station (TAPS), West Coast of India Ambekar AA1*, Priti Kubal1, Sivaperumal P2 and Chandra Prakash1 1ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Panch Marg, Off Yari Road, Versova, Andheri West, Mumbai - 400061 2Center for Environmental Nuclear Research, Directorate of Research SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur-603 203 Received: July 30, 2018; Accepted: August 10, 2018; Published: September 04, 2018 *Corresponding author: Ambekar AA, Senior Research Fellow, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Off Yari Road, Versova, Andheri West, Mumbai-400061, Maharashtra, India, E-mail: [email protected] The change in spatial scale often supposed to alter the Abstract The present study was carried out to assess the marine gastropods checklist around ecologically importance area of Tarapur atomic diversity pattern, in the sense that an increased in scale could power station intertidal area. In three tidal zone areas, quadrate provide more resources to species and that promote an increased sampling method was adopted and the intertidal marine gastropods arein diversity interlinks [9]. for Inthe case study of invertebratesof morphological the secondand ecological largest group on earth is Mollusc [7]. Intertidal molluscan communities parameters of water and sediments are also done. A total of 51 were collected and identified up to species level. Physico chemical convergence between geographically and temporally isolated family dominant it composed 20% followed by Neritidae (12%), intertidal gastropods species were identified; among them Muricidae communities [13].
    [Show full text]
  • Voices of Aboriginal Tasmania Ningina Tunapri Education
    voices of aboriginal tasmania ningenneh tunapry education guide Written by Andy Baird © Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery 2008 voices of aboriginal tasmania ningenneh tunapry A guide for students and teachers visiting curricula guide ningenneh tunapry, the Tasmanian Aboriginal A separate document outlining the curricula links for exhibition at the Tasmanian Museum and the ningenneh tunapry exhibition and this guide is Art Gallery available online at www.tmag.tas.gov.au/education/ Suitable for middle and secondary school resources Years 5 to 10, (students aged 10–17) suggested focus areas across the The guide is ideal for teachers and students of History and Society, Science, English and the Arts, curricula: and encompasses many areas of the National Primary Statements of Learning for Civics and Citizenship, as well as the Tasmanian Curriculum. Oral Stories: past and present (Creation stories, contemporary poetry, music) Traditional Life Continuing Culture: necklace making, basket weaving, mutton-birding Secondary Historical perspectives Repatriation of Aboriginal remains Recognition: Stolen Generation stories: the apology, land rights Art: contemporary and traditional Indigenous land management Activities in this guide that can be done at school or as research are indicated as *classroom Activites based within the TMAG are indicated as *museum Above: Brendon ‘Buck’ Brown on the bark canoe 1 voices of aboriginal tasmania contents This guide, and the new ningenneh tunapry exhibition in the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, looks at the following
    [Show full text]
  • Western Explorer
    Travelling times and distances, based on safe speed and good road conditions Due to the remote and rugged Experience Tasmania’s Smithton – Marrawah: terrain of this region, some unique western wilderness roads are narrow and winding. 45 minutes / 49 km / 90 kmh / sealed The Western Explorer route links Stanley in the North West WESTERN Marrawah – Arthur River: Many of these roads are to Strahan on the West Coast and takes you through some 10 minutes / 12 km / 80 kmh / sealed unsealed and therefore of the State’s most beautiful and isolated areas. susceptible to the varying EXPLORER Road travellers can expect a unique experience, exploring Arthur River – Couta Rocks: weather conditions. 20 minutes / 18 km / 70 kmh / unsealed a region steeped in early mining history, surrounded by wilderness and remarkable scenery. The landscape is wild Couta Rocks – Blackwater Road: West Coast Wilderness Drive Smithton to Strahan and rugged with a climate that can vary from snow to 15 minutes / 16km / 70 kmh / unsealed brilliant sunshine in one day. Blackwater Road – Lindsay River: During wet weather, roads This guide provides you with valuable information about 20 minutes / 21 km / 70 kmh / unsealed can become slippery, flooded or potholed. Unsealed roads the road conditions between Stanley and Strahan, however Lindsay River – Corinna: can become extremely dusty be prepared: If you break down, the roads are isolated and 90 minutes / 57 km / 40 kmh / unsealed during dry periods. you may experience a long delay before another traveller or assistance comes. Arthur River – Corinna: For your safety and comfort 2 hrs 15 minutes. it is wise to check road and Arthur River – Zeehan: weather conditions before 3 hrs 15 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Geoconservation Values
    Geoconservation Values of the TWWHA and Adjacent Areas 3.0 GEOCONSERVATION AND GEOHERITAGE VALUES OF THE TWWHA AND ADJACENT AREAS 3.1 Introduction This section provides an assessment of the geoconservation (geoheritage) values of the TWWHA, with particular emphasis on the identification of geoconservation values of World Heritage significance. This assessment is based on: • a review (Section 2.3.2) of the geoconservation values cited in the 1989 TWWHA nomination (DASETT 1989); • a review of relevant new scientific data that has become available since 1989 (Section 2.4); and: • the use of contemporary procedures for rigorous justification of geoconservation significance (see Section 2.2) in terms of the updated World Heritage Criteria (UNESCO 1999; see this report Section 2.3.3). In general, this review indicates that the major geoconservation World Heritage values of the TWWHA identified in 1989 are robust and remain valid. However, only a handful of individual sites or features in the TWWHA are considered to have World Heritage value in their own right, as physical features considered in isolation (eg, Exit Cave). In general it is the diversity, extent and inter-relationships between numerous features, sites, areas or processes that gives World Heritage significance to certain geoheritage “themes” in the TWWHA (eg, the "Ongoing Natural Geomorphic and Soil Process Systems" and “Late Cainozoic "Ice Ages" and Climate Change Record” themes). This "wholistic" principle under-pinned the 1989 TWWHA nomination (DASETT 1989, p. 27; see this report Section 2.3.2), and is strongly supported by the present review (see discussion and justification of this principle in Section 2.2).
    [Show full text]