DOCSLIB.ORG

Diaspididae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Coccoidea). Fauna of New Zealand 66, 275 Pp. Henderson, R. C. 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Diaspididae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Coccoidea). Fauna of New Zealand 66, 275 Pp. Henderson, R. C. 2011 Henderson, R. C. 2011: Diaspididae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Coccoidea). Fauna of New Zealand 66, 275 pp. The Copyright notice printed on page 4 applies to the use of this PDF. This PDF is not to be posted on websites. Links should be made to: FNZ.LandcareResearch.co.nz EDITORIAL BOARD Dr R. M. Emberson, c/- Department of Ecology, P.O. Box 84, Lincoln University, New Zealand Dr M. J. Fletcher, Director of the Collections, NSW Agricultural Scientific Collections Unit, Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia Dr R. J. B. Hoare, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Dr M.-C. Larivière, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Mr R. L. Palma, Natural Environment Department, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, P.O. Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand SERIES EDITOR Dr T. K. Crosby, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 66 Diaspididae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Coccoidea) R. C. Henderson Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland 1142, New Zealand [email protected] Manaaki W h e n u a P R E S S Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand 2011 4 Henderson (2011): Diaspididae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Coccoidea) Copyright © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd 2011 No part of this work covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping information retrieval systems, or otherwise) without the written permission of the publisher. Cataloguing in publication Henderson, R. C. (Rosa Constance) Diaspididae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Coccoidea) / R. C. Henderson. – Lincoln, N.Z. : Manaaki Whenua Press, Landcare Research, 2011. (Fauna of New Zealand, ISSN 0111-5383 (print), ISSN 1179-7193 (online) ; no. 66). ISBN 978-0-478-34726-5 (print) ISBN 978-0-478-34727-2 (online) I. Title. II. Series. UDC 595.752.3(931) Suggested citation: Henderson, R. C. 2011. Diaspididae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Coccoidea). Fauna of New Zealand 66, 275 pp. Prepared for publication by the series editor and the author using computer-based text processing, layout, and printing at Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand. To access on-line extracts from this series visit: http://fnz.landcareresearch.co.nz/ M~ori text by H. Jacob, Ætaki. Published by Manaaki Whenua Press, Landcare Research, P.O. Box 40, Lincoln, Canterbury, N.Z. Website: http://www.mwpress.co.nz/ Printed by PrintLink Ltd, Wellington Date of publication 23 May 2011 Front cover: Lindingaspis rossi (Maskell, 1891), Ross’s black scale or circular black scale; male (left) and female (right) (Illustrator: Rosa C. Henderson). Publication of the Fauna of New Zealand series is the result of a research investment by the Ministry for Science and Innovation. Fauna of New Zealand 66 5 POPULAR SUMMARY HE WHAKARAPOPOTOTANGA Class Insecta Order Hemiptera Superfamily Coccoidea Family Diaspididae Armoured scale insects The armoured scale insect family Diaspididae is one of ten Illustration / Whakaahua: Symeria pyriformis (Maskell) families of plant-sucking scale insects present in New Zea- female and crawler (Illustrator / Kaiwhakaahua: Rosa C. Henderson). land. Unlike members of those other nine families, armoured scale insects do not produce the sugary exudate known as honeydew, and so they are not directly associated with the growth of sooty mould fungi in their habitat, nor do they Ng~ pepeke unahi whai p~kai support honeydew feeders such as birds, geckos, bees, and wasps in natural ecosystems. The reason for this lack of Ko t‘nei wh~nau pepeke unahi whai p~kai, a Diaspididae, honeydew production is the first unique feature of the koia t‘tahi o ng~ wh~nau pepeke unahi ngongo tipu tekau family – the stomach of armoured scale insects is not di- kei Aotearoa e noho ana. Ko t‘tahi o Çna rerek‘tanga, rectly connected to the hind gut. They avoid the problem k~ore ia e whakaputa i te m~turunga h~piapia e k§ia nei ko of dealing with large volumes of liquid from phloem sap by te ‘honeydew’, nÇ reira ehara n~na i tipu ai te instead feeding on plant cells or parenchyma. puruhekaheka pango e kitea ana i tÇna w~hi noho, ehara The second unique feature of the family is their armour r~nei i te mea n~na e ora ai ng~ manu, ng~ mokomoko, ng~ or scale cover, in which they incorporate the cast skins of p§, ng~ w~pu, ko taua waireka t~ r~tou kai i ng~ taiao their juvenile moults, cemented together with waxes from m~ori. Ko te take i kore ai ia e hanga i te waireka, koia te various wax-producing ducts and pores. The third unique ~huatanga ahurei tuatahi o t‘nei wh~nau, ar~ he wehe feature is the fused segments of the posterior part of the motuhake nÇ te w~hanga tuatahi o te puku me ng~ kÇpiro abdomen called the pygidium; this has special lobes on the o muri. K~ore r~tou e kai i te pia mai i te tarikai — ka kai margin that are said to act like trowels and often also brush- k‘ r~tou i ng~ pãtau tipu e k§ia nei ko te ‘parenchyma’. like appendages, and that help spread the waxes when the Ko te ~huatanga ahurei tuarua o t‘nei wh~nau, ko te insect twists and turns during scale cover construction. p~kai tonu e noho ana hei kahu mÇna. Ka hangaia ki ng~ Having a strong protective cover is important because ngeti o ng~ whakam~unutanga kÇhungahunga, he mea armoured scale insects are legless and sedentary, except for whakapiri tahi ki ng~ harare ka m~turu mai i Çna anÇ pã, the first crawler stage and the tiny adult males that only i Çna anÇ kÇputa hanga harare. Ko te ~huatanga ahurei live for a few days. tuatoru, ko te hono tahi o ng~ w~hanga whakamuri o te tia, The native (endemic) species are found only on native ar~, o te pygidium; he pokopoko kei te tapa, me ‘tahi atu host plants and none are of economic importance or do any hanga p‘nei i te paraihe te ~hua, ko te mahi a ‘nei hanga, serious damage. Some of the endemic scale insects are quite he hora haere, he pani haere i ng~ harare ina takaoraora te host specific, for example, the two Anoplaspis species pepeke ki te hanga p~kai mÇna. He mea nui kia kaha tonu found only on rata and pohutukawa (Metrosideros), and te kahu o te unahi whai p~kai, i te mea he waewae kore, he (continued overleaf) (haere tonu) 6 Henderson (2011): Diaspididae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Coccoidea) leptocarpus scale found only on oioi (jointed wire rush). neke kore, atu i ng~ mea kei te tã~tupu ngaoki tuatahi, me Among others with wider host ranges, Poliaspis and ng~ k~tua toa ririki e ora ana mÇ ‘tahi r~ ruarua noa iho nei. Symeria are perhaps the most species-rich genera. Oddly, Noho tahi ai ng~ momo m~ori taketake ake ki ng~ tupu while there are no records of armoured scale insects on m~ori anahe. K~ore ng~ momo nei e takakino i ng~ tupu i southern beech (Nothofagus), felt scale insects (eriococcids) noho atu ai r~tou, k~ore he p~nga kino ki te Çhanga. Ko in contrast show a remarkable diversification there. Nearly ‘tahi, ka noho wh~iti ki ‘tahi momo r~kau ruarua nei, hei all the endemic armoured scale species belong to the sub- tauira, kitea ai ng~ momo Anoplaspis e rua i te r~t~ me te family Diaspidinae, and there is just one species in the pÇhutukawa anahe (Metrosideros), ~, ko te unahi other subfamily Aspidiotinae, which is surprising com- leptocarpus kitea ai i te oioi anahe. O ng~ mea he maha ake pared with the many more aspidiotine members of the ~ r~tou r~kau noho, ko ng~i Poliaspis me ng~i Symeria pea introduced fauna. ng~ puninga e huhua ana ng~ momo. Ko t‘tahi mea ~hua Introduced or adventive species arrived accidentally korok‘, k~ore anÇ i kitea he unahi whai p~kai e noho ana ki on plants brought by the first European settlers, and by ng~ tawai o te tonga (Nothofagus), engari kua kitea te tini 1879 six species, including greedy scale, oleander scale, noa o ng~ momo unahi wh§tau (ng~ eriococcid) e noho tahi and rose scale had established. Since then the adventive ana ki te tawai. Tata tonu ko te katoa o ng~ momo m~ori o species total has reached twenty-one, plus eight Australasian ng~i unahi whai p~kai, nÇ te wh~nau iti Diaspidinae; kotahi species. A few species still manage to breach the border – noa iho te momo i t‘r~ atu wh~nui iti, i ng~ Aspidiotinae. most recently zamia (cycad) scale in 2004 and minute cy- He hanga ~hua rerek‘ anÇ t‘nei, ina whakaritea ki ng~ press scale in 2009. Some of the adventive species are momo r~waho kei konei e noho ana — ko te maha tonu o cosmopolitan pests and can be problematic, mainly in cit- ‘r~ he aspidiotine. rus, apple, pear, and kiwifruit orchards. Only four of them I tau pokereh mai ng momo r waho i runga i ng have invaded natural ecosystems but they seem to do little ã ~ ~ ~ tipu i kawea mai i te oroko taenga mai o tauiwi ki t nei damage there. ‘ whenua noho ai. 1879 rawa ake te tau, e ono ng~ momo kua rarau e noho, tae atu ki te unahi pukukai, te unahi oleander, me te unahi rÇhi.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Morphology and Adaptation of Immature Stages of Hemipteran Insects
    © 2019 JETIR January 2019, Volume 6, Issue 1 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) Morphology and Adaptation of Immature Stages of Hemipteran Insects Devina Seram and Yendrembam K Devi Assistant Professor, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab Introduction Insect Adaptations An adaptation is an environmental change so an insect can better fit in and have a better chance of living. Insects are modified in many ways according to their environment. Insects can have adapted legs, mouthparts, body shapes, etc. which makes them easier to survive in the environment that they live in and these adaptations also help them get away from predators and other natural enemies. Here are some adaptations in the immature stages of important families of Hemiptera. Hemiptera are hemimetabolous exopterygotes with only egg and nymphal immature stages and are divided into two sub-orders, homoptera and heteroptera. The immature stages of homopteran families include Delphacidae, Fulgoridae, Cercopidae, Cicadidae, Membracidae, Cicadellidae, Psyllidae, Aleyrodidae, Aphididae, Phylloxeridae, Coccidae, Pseudococcidae, Diaspididae and heteropteran families Notonectidae, Corixidae, Belastomatidae, Nepidae, Hydrometridae, Gerridae, Veliidae, Cimicidae, Reduviidae, Pentatomidae, Lygaeidae, Coreidae, Tingitidae, Miridae will be discussed. Homopteran families 1. Delphacidae – Eg. plant hoppers They comprise the largest family of plant hoppers and are characterized by the presence of large, flattened spurs at the apex of their hind tibiae. Eggs are deposited inside plant tissues, elliptical in shape, colourless to whitish. Nymphs are similar in appearance to adults except for size, colour, under- developed wing pads and genitalia. 2. Fulgoridae – Eg. lantern bugs They can be recognized with their antennae inserted on the sides & beneath the eyes.
    [Show full text]
  • Insetos Do Brasil
    COSTA LIMA INSETOS DO BRASIL 2.º TOMO HEMÍPTEROS ESCOLA NACIONAL DE AGRONOMIA SÉRIE DIDÁTICA N.º 3 - 1940 INSETOS DO BRASIL 2.º TOMO HEMÍPTEROS A. DA COSTA LIMA Professor Catedrático de Entomologia Agrícola da Escola Nacional de Agronomia Ex-Chefe de Laboratório do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz INSETOS DO BRASIL 2.º TOMO CAPÍTULO XXII HEMÍPTEROS ESCOLA NACIONAL DE AGRONOMIA SÉRIE DIDÁTICA N.º 3 - 1940 CONTEUDO CAPÍTULO XXII PÁGINA Ordem HEMÍPTERA ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Superfamília SCUTELLEROIDEA ............................................................................................................ 42 Superfamília COREOIDEA ............................................................................................................................... 79 Super família LYGAEOIDEA ................................................................................................................................. 97 Superfamília THAUMASTOTHERIOIDEA ............................................................................................... 124 Superfamília ARADOIDEA ................................................................................................................................... 125 Superfamília TINGITOIDEA .................................................................................................................................... 132 Superfamília REDUVIOIDEA ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Methods and Work Profile
    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa,Phylogeny and Higher Classification of the Scale Insects
    Zootaxa 1668: 413–425 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Phylogeny and higher classification of the scale insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea)* P.J. GULLAN1 AND L.G. COOK2 1Department of Entomology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 2School of Integrative Biology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. Email: [email protected] *In: Zhang, Z.-Q. & Shear, W.A. (Eds) (2007) Linnaeus Tercentenary: Progress in Invertebrate Taxonomy. Zootaxa, 1668, 1–766. Table of contents Abstract . .413 Introduction . .413 A review of archaeococcoid classification and relationships . 416 A review of neococcoid classification and relationships . .420 Future directions . .421 Acknowledgements . .422 References . .422 Abstract The superfamily Coccoidea contains nearly 8000 species of plant-feeding hemipterans comprising up to 32 families divided traditionally into two informal groups, the archaeococcoids and the neococcoids. The neococcoids form a mono- phyletic group supported by both morphological and genetic data. In contrast, the monophyly of the archaeococcoids is uncertain and the higher level ranks within it have been controversial, particularly since the late Professor Jan Koteja introduced his multi-family classification for scale insects in 1974. Recent phylogenetic studies using molecular and morphological data support the recognition of up to 15 extant families of archaeococcoids, including 11 families for the former Margarodidae sensu lato, vindicating Koteja’s views. Archaeococcoids are represented better in the fossil record than neococcoids, and have an adequate record through the Tertiary and Cretaceous but almost no putative coccoid fos- sils are known from earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Sheets on Quarantine Pests
    Prepared by CABI and EPPO for the EU under Contract 90/399003 Data Sheets on Quarantine Pests Aonidiella citrina IDENTITY Name: Aonidiella citrina (Coquillett) Synonyms: Aspidiotus citrinus Coquillett Chrysomphalus aurantii citrinus (Coquillett) Taxonomic position: Insecta: Hemiptera: Homoptera: Diaspididae Common names: Yellow scale (English) Cochenille jaune (French) Escama amarilla de los cítricos (Spanish) Notes on taxonomy and nomenclature: The original description by Coquillett is inadequate and simply refers to 'the yellow scale' on orange (Nel, 1933). A. citrina is morphologically very similar to the Californian red scale, Aonidiella aurantii (Maskell), and was considered to be a variety until Nel (1933) raised it to specific level based on a comparative study of their ecology, biology and morphology. Bayer computer code: AONDCI EU Annex designation: II/A1 HOSTS A. citrina is polyphagous attacking plant species belonging to more than 50 genera in 32 families. The main hosts of economic importance are Citrus spp., especially oranges (C. sinensis), but the insect is also recorded incidentally on a wide range of ornamentals and some fruit crops including Acacia, bananas (Musa paradisiaca), Camellia including tea (C. sinensis), Clematis, Cucurbitaceae, Eucalyptus, Euonymus, guavas (Psidium guajava), Hedera helix, Jasminum, Ficus, Ligustrum, Magnolia, mangoes (Mangifera indica), Myrica, olives (Olea europea), peaches (Prunus persica), poplars (Populus), Rosa, Schefflera actinophylla, Strelitzia reginae, Viburnum and Yucca. The main potential hosts in the EPPO region are Citrus spp. growing in the southern part of the region, around the Mediterranean. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION A. citrina originated in Asia and has spread to various tropical and subtropical regions throughout the world. The precise distribution of A.
    [Show full text]
  • Apoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Fauna of New Zealand 57, 295 Pp. Donovan, B. J. 2007
    Donovan, B. J. 2007: Apoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Fauna of New Zealand 57, 295 pp. EDITORIAL BOARD REPRESENTATIVES OF L ANDCARE R ESEARCH Dr D. Choquenot Landcare Research Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Dr R. J. B. Hoare Landcare Research Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF UNIVERSITIES Dr R.M. Emberson c/- Bio-Protection and Ecology Division P.O. Box 84, Lincoln University, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF M USEUMS Mr R.L. Palma Natural Environment Department Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa P.O. Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF OVERSEAS I NSTITUTIONS Dr M. J. Fletcher Director of the Collections NSW Agricultural Scientific Collections Unit Forest Road, Orange NSW 2800, Australia * * * SERIES EDITOR Dr T. K. Crosby Landcare Research Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 57 Apoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera) B. J. Donovan Donovan Scientific Insect Research, Canterbury Agriculture and Science Centre, Lincoln, New Zealand [email protected] Manaaki W h e n u a P R E S S Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand 2007 4 Donovan (2007): Apoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera) Copyright © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd 2007 No part of this work covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping information retrieval systems, or otherwise) without the written permission of the publisher. Cataloguing in publication Donovan, B. J. (Barry James), 1941– Apoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera) / B. J. Donovan – Lincoln, N.Z. : Manaaki Whenua Press, Landcare Research, 2007. (Fauna of New Zealand, ISSN 0111–5383 ; no.
    [Show full text]
  • Otanewainuku ED (Report Prepared on 13 August 2013)
    1 NZFRI collection wish list for Otanewainuku ED (Report prepared on 13 August 2013) Fern Ally Isolepis cernua Lycopodiaceae Isolepis inundata Lycopodium fastigiatum Isolepis marginata Lycopodium scariosum Isolepis pottsii Psilotaceae Isolepis prolifera Tmesipteris lanceolata Lepidosperma australe Lepidosperma laterale Gymnosperm Schoenoplectus pungens Cupressaceae Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani Chamaecyparis lawsoniana Schoenus apogon Cupressus macrocarpa Schoenus tendo Pinaceae Uncinia filiformis Pinus contorta Uncinia gracilenta Pinus patula Uncinia rupestris Pinus pinaster Uncinia scabra Pinus ponderosa Hemerocallidaceae Pinus radiata Dianella nigra Pinus strobus Phormium cookianum subsp. hookeri Podocarpaceae Phormium tenax Podocarpus totara var. totara Iridaceae Prumnopitys taxifolia Crocosmia xcrocosmiiflora Libertia grandiflora Monocotyledon Libertia ixioides Agapanthaceae Watsonia bulbillifera Agapanthus praecox Juncaceae Alliaceae Juncus articulatus Allium triquetrum Juncus australis Araceae Juncus conglomeratus Alocasia brisbanensis Juncus distegus Arum italicum Juncus edgariae Lemna minor Juncus effusus var. effusus Zantedeschia aethiopica Juncus sarophorus Arecaceae Juncus tenuis var. tenuis Rhopalostylis sapida Luzula congesta Asparagaceae Luzula multiflora Asparagus aethiopicus Luzula picta var. limosa Asparagus asparagoides Orchidaceae Cordyline australis x banksii Acianthus sinclairii Cordyline banksii x pumilio Aporostylis bifolia Asteliaceae Corunastylis nuda Collospermum microspermum Diplodium alobulum Commelinaceae
    [Show full text]
  • THE SCALE INSECT GENUS CHIONASPIS : a REVISED CONCEPT (HOMOPTERA : COCCOIDEA : Title DIASPIDIDAE)
    THE SCALE INSECT GENUS CHIONASPIS : A REVISED CONCEPT (HOMOPTERA : COCCOIDEA : Title DIASPIDIDAE) Author(s) Takagi, Sadao Insecta matsumurana. New series : journal of the Faculty of Agriculture Hokkaido University, series entomology, 33, 1- Citation 77 Issue Date 1985-11 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/9832 Type bulletin (article) File Information 33_p1-77.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP INSECTA MATSUMURANA NEW SERIES 33 NOVEMBER 1985 THE SCALE INSECT GENUS CHIONASPIS: A REVISED CONCEPT (HOMOPTERA: COCCOIDEA: DIASPIDIDAE) By SADAO TAKAGI Research Trips for Agricultural and Forest Insects in the Subcontinent of India (Grants-in-Aid for Overseas Scientific Survey, Ministry of Education, Japanese Government, 1978, No_ 304108; 1979, No_ 404307; 1983, No_ 58041001; 1984, No_ 59043001), Scientific Report No_ 21. Scientific Results of the Hokkaid6 University Expeditions to the Himalaya_ Abstract TAKAGI, S_ 1985_ The scale insect genus Chionaspis: a revised concept (Homoptera: Coc­ coidea: Diaspididae)_ Ins_ matsum_ n_ s. 33, 77 pp., 7 tables, 30 figs. (3 text-figs., 27 pis.). The genus Chionaspis is revised, and a modified concept of the genus is proposed. Fifty-nine species are recognized as members of the genus. All these species are limited to the Northern Hemisphere: many of them are distributed in eastern Asia and North America, and much fewer ones in western Asia and the Mediterranean Region. In Eurasia most species have been recorded from particular plants and many are associated with Fagaceae, while in North America polyphagy is rather prevailing and the hosts are scattered over much more diverse plants. In the number and arrangement of the modified macroducts in the 2nd instar males many eastern Asian species are uniform, while North American species show diverse patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspidiotus Nerii Bouchè (Insecta: Hemipthera: Diaspididae)
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 2003 Molecular systematics of a sexual and parthenogenetic species complex : Aspidiotus nerii Bouchè (Insecta: Hemipthera: Diaspididae). Lisa M. Provencher University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Provencher, Lisa M., "Molecular systematics of a sexual and parthenogenetic species complex : Aspidiotus nerii Bouchè (Insecta: Hemipthera: Diaspididae)." (2003). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 3090. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/3090 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MOLECULAR SYSTEMATICS OF A SEXUAL AND PARTHENOGENETIC SPECIES COMPLEX: Aspidiotus nerii BOUCHE (INSECTA: HEMIPTERA: DIASPIDIDAE). A Thesis Presented by LISA M. PROVENCHER Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May 2003 Entomology MOLECULAR SYSTEMATICS OF A SEXUAL AND PARTHENOGENETIC SPECIES COMPLEX: Aspidiotus nerii BOUCHE (INSECTA: HEMIPTERA: DIASPIDIDAE). A Thesis Presented by Lisa M. Provencher Roy G. V^n Driesche, Department Head Department of Entomology What is the opposite of A. nerii? iuvf y :j3MSuy ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank Edward and Mari, for their patience and understanding while I worked on this master’s thesis. And a thank you also goes to Michael Sacco for the A. nerii jokes. I would like to thank my advisor Benjamin Normark, and a special thank you to committee member Jason Cryan for all his generous guidance, assistance and time.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Responses and Control of California Red Scale Aonidiella Aurantii (Maskell) (Hemiptera: Diaspididae)
    Biological responses and control of California red scale Aonidiella aurantii (Maskell) (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) by Khalid Omairy Mohammed Submitted to Murdoch University in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education Murdoch University Perth, Western Australia March 2020 Declaration The work described in this thesis was undertaken while I was an enrolled student for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Murdoch University, Western Australia. I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. To the best of my knowledge, all work performed by others, published or unpublished, has been duly acknowledged. Khalid O. Mohammed Date: March 10, 2020 I Acknowledgements بِ ْس ِمِِاللَّ ِـه َِّالر ْح َم ٰـ ِن َِّالر ِح ِيمِ ُ َويَ ْسأَلُ َونَك َِع ِن ُِّالروحِِِۖقُ ِل ُِّالر ُوح ِِم ْنِأَ ْم ِر َِر ِب َيِو َماِأ ِوتيتُ ْم ِِم َن ِْال ِع ْل ِمِإِ ََّّل َِق ِل ايًلِ﴿٨٥﴾ The research for this thesis was undertaken in the School of Veterinary and Life Science, Murdoch University. I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to my supervisors Professor Yonglin Ren and Dr Manjree Agarwal “Postharvest Biosecurity and Food Safety Laboratory Murdoch” for their support with enthusiasm, constructive editing, and patience throughout the years of this wonderful project. I deeply appreciate their encouragement, assistance and for being so willing to take me on as a student. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to all those who helped me in completing this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Ants, Pests and Natural Enemies in Mediterranean Citrus
    ANTS, PESTS AND NATURAL ENEMIES IN MEDITERRANEAN CITRUS Ecological interactions and practical implications for biological control DOCTORAL THESIS Presented by: Altea Calabuig Gomar Directed by: Ferran Garcia Marí and Apostolos Pekas València, May 2015 UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA Escola Tècnica Superior d’Enginyeria Agronòmica i del Medi Natural UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA Escola Tècnica Superior d’Enginyeria Agronòmica i del Medi Natural Departament d’Ecosistemes Agroforestals Ants, pests and natural enemies in Mediterranean citrus: ecological interactions and practical implications for biological control DOCTORAL THESIS Presented by: Altea Calabuig Gomar Directed by: Ferran Garcia Marí Apostolos Pekas València, 2015 A Dídac “Mucha gente pequeña en lugares pequeños, haciendo cosas pequeñas pueden cambiar el mundo” Eduardo Galeano Aknowledgments Després de 4 anys de feina em vénen al cap un munt de persones sense les quals, directament o indirectament, no hagués pogut acabar aquesta tesi i a les quals m’agradaria mostrar el meu agraïment. En primer lloc, vull agrair a Ferran Garcia Marí que em donara l’oportunitat de realitzar aquesta tesi amb ell. He gaudit del seu gran coneixement i de la seua ampla experiència en el camp de l’entomologia. Ha estat tot un privilegi. Gràcies per tota l’atenció i ensenyament que m’has donat. També li dec un agraïment especial a Apostolos Pekas per haver codirigit aquesta tesi i per haver-me permès d’aprofundir en la investigació que ell va encetar. Per haver confiat en mi des d’un principi sense gairebé conèixer-me. Tolis ha estat tot un exemple de rigor i professionalitat. Les discussions científiques i no científiques amb ell sempre han estat ben enriquidores.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]