Congressional Record-House. Maroh 19

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congressional Record-House. Maroh 19 I 2534 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE. MAROH 19, So that the tactics of our Republican friends are not new in this could restrain any improper tendency on the part of the Executive or Chamber. of the Democratic majority in the Honse to excess in the appropriations We discussed the question atlength. Youy;illfind bylookingbacktothe his­ or in the extravagant use of the public money for any purpose, as well tory of that period that Mr. Ba rton, of Missouri, introduced such resolutions as as excesses in other matters, by resistance and exposure ·of improper I have mentioned, and discu ed them with great ability. You will find that, in every instance when the question was moved, the Democratic party, then measures before the country. called the Jackson party, unanimously voted down every r esolution denying But, let me saythatwhile such is the proud position which the other or calling for the reasons of executiYe removals. By referring to the debates side of this Chamber ought to occupy, its position to-day as demon­ of that day you will find that e>ery d ebater on the Democratic or Jackson side of the Senate denied utterly the power of the Senate to look behind the nomina­ strated by its action in reference to this que tion is that of an obstruct­ tions rmd inquire into the rouses of r emoval. Such, I repeat, was not my opin­ ive party, hindering the due exercise of the executive powers of this ion. I say again, I endeavored at the time to vindicate the opposite position, but Government, and from the very habit of opposition there is imminent I was voted down. The party with w h ich I was associated was always beaten upon that question. We were voted down at everysucceedingsession whenever danger that the other side of this Chamber may descend from the high · the question was raised, throughout the whole of my Congressional career; and position it ought to occupy down to a mere cabal and faction. there n ever wn.saninstancein whichitwus decided thattheSellilteofthe United What is the position which the Senate occupies to-day? The time was States had authority to limit or contJ:ol the removing power of the Executive. The result was that, as a majority of the sovereign States of the Union held when great men and great parties met in the Halls of Congress and dis­ that doctrine for twenty-five years or more, I at last acquiesced in what I could cussed measures of government and administrative policies; but to-day not prevent, nnd was forced to succumb to the views of the majority. All my the Senate is degraded by a scramble for the retention of offices in the political friends finally yielded and gave up the point, considering that the voice of the people of the United Sta tes had sustained our opponents on the whole Republican party. If some one who in other days had w:itnes ed in the matter in difference between us. We finally abandoned, not by any public re· old Chamber the debates in advocacy and opposition on questions of gov­ cantation, but by our silence, resistance to the removing power, as a point of ernment and policies of administration should appear in these galleries political controversy; and hence, for many years past, you ha>e scarcely heard a word on this topic in the Halls of Congress. and look down on the attitude of the majority of the Senate in a contest Ever since the days of General Jackson each successive President had exer­ which it has forced upon the President for the inspection of his private cised this power of removal without question from any quarter whatever. He papers, with what sadness would he contemplate the change that has has exercised it in every instance without control, without record, without trial, and without giving notice t-o the party accused. No man has contended for years taken place. Perhaps retiring with bowed head from a scene so humil­ past that o. person removed from office had a right to demand from the Execu­ iating, he would recall the exclamation, "Thou art the man, but oh ! tive of this country the reason for which he wns removed, or might require a how fallen.'' trial before he was removed, or the production of a record to show the grounds for his removal, or that notice should be given him, and that he should be heard I should be glad to see the Senate relieve itself from the impression anywhere in regard tQ the removal. 'Vehad in vain denounced the tyranny of which this discussion is calculated to make and resume the high posi­ the proscriptive PQlicy,and we yielded, however reluctantly, to the popular will. tion it ought to occupy, and not degrade itself by seeking to degrade the Justwhat1tir. Clayton said, in referencetowhatthecommissionsbore executive department of the Government. on their face, that they were held at ''the pleasure of the President,'' is Mr. COLQUITT. 1tir. President, I am conscious that this is a very true of naval commissions. I have not looked into civil commissions unpropitious hour to engage the attention of the Senate. The debate or into military commissions, but I did take the pains to go to the office has been protracted; it has been conducted with signal ability and great of the Secretary of the Navy, and I find that the commissions to-day historical research; and it is not unnatural that the patience of the Sen­ bear upon their face that they hold their offices at ''the pleasure of the ate has been wearied, or that thenoveltyofthesnbject has been lostto President." Whether this is true of civil officers I do not know, for I the public. I promise, however, that I shall be very brief in the re­ have not examined the commissions; whether it is true of military com­ marks that I have to make. I shall not follow at length the line of missions I do not know, but after the action of 1789, during the ad­ argument or of precedent which has been pursued by others. ministration of President Washington, the formu1a of commissions was The question has been debated so ably, and so many precedents and adopted in conformity with the declaration of the Congress of 1789 that arguments which have been presented by those who have considered it removals were at the pleasure of the President, and the commissions have related almost entirely to the power of the P~esident to make re­ to the nava.l officers at least indicate that that has been the judgment movals from office, that it seems to me it is hardly necessary to continue of the country from that day to this, for the commissions have not been the discussion upon that line. altered. Mr. RANSOM. Mr. President, it is now late, and if it be agreeable I am aware that there was some legislation in 1865 in reference to re­ to the Senator from Georgia I will move an adjournment, so that he movals of military or naval officers unless on the judgment of courts­ may have the floor for Jtfonday. martial. That relieves the executive department no doubt just as it Several SENATORS. Let us have an executive session. relie>ed President Pierce in 1855 to have the report of a retiring board Mr. COLQUITT. It will be agreeable to me if I can be heard early in order that he might exercise his constitutional function of removing on Monday morning. I shall not occupy a great length of time in the naval officers. So the President, in regard to military commissions, re­ discussion. The Senate is wearied, and it is more from ·regard to their tains the power of removal inherent in his office, and it is not affected comfort than to my own that I yield to the motion of my friend from by the legislation of 1866 in reference to military officers, nor by the North Carolina. action of Congress in 1867 in reference to the tenure-of-office act. The Mr. EDMUNDS. I wish to say, if I may by unanimous consent, constitutional power still inheres in the President, though he may think that while I shall not oppose this anjournment, I hope the Senate will it proper to follow the statutory provisions in the exercise of his inherent be willing, as the Senator from Delaware says this is such a frivolous power of removal, in conformity with the wishes of Congress, but it is matter, to stay and put an end to it on Monday, no matter how long it nevertheless true that legislation has not deprived him of his constitu­ takes. tional function of removal ftom civil office. The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Does the Senator from Georgia yield Mr. President, the existence of political parties in this country is, I to the Senator from North Carolina? had almost said, absolutely necessary to the proper administration of Mr. COLQUITT. Yes, sir. public affairs; perhaps in all governments opposition parties are essen­ 1tir. RANSOM. I move that the Senate adjourn. tial to the proper administration of government, and it is especially Mr. COCKRELL. There is some executive business, I understand. true in this country. The minority party can exercise a most salutary Mr. EDMUNDS. There is not enough executive business to bother influence upon the action of the majority, and our Republican friends about now. on the other side of t.his Chamber occupy a. position to-day where they The PRESIDENT pro tempore.
Recommended publications
  • Catherine Mary White Foster's Eyewitness Account of the Battle of Gettysburg, with Background on the Foster Family Union Soldiers David A
    Volume 1 Article 5 1995 Catherine Mary White Foster's Eyewitness Account of the Battle of Gettysburg, with Background on the Foster Family Union Soldiers David A. Murdoch Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ach Part of the Military History Commons, United States History Commons, and the Women's History Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Murdoch, David A. (1995) "Catherine Mary White Foster's Eyewitness Account of the Battle of Gettysburg, with Background on the Foster Family Union Soldiers," Adams County History: Vol. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ach/vol1/iss1/5 This open access article is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Catherine Mary White Foster's Eyewitness Account of the Battle of Gettysburg, with Background on the Foster Family Union Soldiers Abstract Catherine Mary White Foster lived with her elderly parents in the red brick house on the northwest corner of Washington and High Streets in Gettysburg at the time of the battle, 1-3 July 1863. She was the only child of James White Foster and Catherine (nee Swope) Foster (a former resident of Lancaster county), who married on 11 May 1817 and settled in Gettysburg, Adams county, Pennsylvania. Her father, James White Foster, had served his country as a first lieutenant in the War of 1812. Her grandparents, James Foster and Catherine (nee White) Foster, had emigrated with her father and five older children from county Donegal, Ireland, in 1790, and settled near New Alexandria, Westmoreland county, Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Annual Cbunci1
    Analysis ofAnnual Cbunci1 The (burch and the \Xar in Lebanon A QuarterlyJournal of theAssociation ofAdventist fununs VolumeS, Number2 Reviews of Ronald Numbers' Book ' By Schwarz, G ,the White F5ttte Ana Others, Plus hers'Response SPECTRUM EDITORIAL BOARD Ottilie Stafford Richard Emmerson Margaret McFarland Alvin L. Kwiram, Chairman South Lancaster, Massachusetts College Place, Washington Ann Arbor, Michigan Seattle, Washington EDITORS Helen Evans La Vonne Neff Roy Branson Keene, Texas College Place, Washington Roy Branson Washington, D.C. Charles Scriven Judy Folkenberg Ronald Numbers Molleurus Couperus Washington, D.C. Madison, Wisconsin Lorna Linda, California CONSULTING Lawrence Geraty Edward E. Robinson Tom Dybdahl Berrien Springs, Michigan Chicago, Illinois Takoma Park, Maryland EDITORS Fritz Guy Gerhard Svrcek-Seiler Gary Land Kjeld' Andersen Berrien Springs, Michigan Lystrup, Denmark Riverside, California Vienna, Austria Roberta J. Moore Eric Anderson J orgen Henriksen Betty Stirling Riverside, California Angwin, California North Reading, Massachusetts Washington, D.C. Charles Scriven Raymond Cottrell Eric A. Magnusson L. E. Trader St. Helena, California Washington, D.C. Cooranbong, Australia Darmstadt, Germany Association of Adventist Forums EXECUTIVE Of Finance Regional Co-ordinator Rudy Bata COMMITTEE Ronald D. Cople David Claridge Rocky Mount, North Carolina Silver Spring, Maryland Rockville, Maryland President Grant N. Mitchell Glenn E. Coe Of International Affairs Systems Consultant Fresno, California West Hartford, Connecticut William Carey Molleurus Couperus Lanny H. Fisk Lorna Linda, California Silver Spring, Maryland Vice President Walla Walla, Washington Leslie H. Pitton, Jr. Of Outreach Systems Manager Reading, Pennsylvania Karen Shea Joseph Mesar Don McNeill Berrien Springs, Michigan Executive Secretary Boston, Massachusetts Spencerville, Maryland Viveca Black Stan Aufdemberg Treasurer Arlington, Virginia STAFF Lorna Linda, California Administrative Secretary Richard C.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline 1864
    CIVIL WAR TIMELINE 1864 January Radical Republicans are hostile to Lincoln’s policies, fearing that they do not provide sufficient protection for ex-slaves, that the 10% amnesty plan is not strict enough, and that Southern states should demonstrate more significant efforts to eradicate the slave system before being allowed back into the Union. Consequently, Congress refuses to recognize the governments of Southern states, or to seat their elected representatives. Instead, legislators begin to work on their own Reconstruction plan, which will emerge in July as the Wade-Davis Bill. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/reconstruction/states/sf_timeline.html] [http://www.blackhistory.harpweek.com/4Reconstruction/ReconTimeline.htm] Congress now understands the Confederacy to be the face of a deeply rooted cultural system antagonistic to the principles of a “free labor” society. Many fear that returning home rule to such a system amounts to accepting secession state by state and opening the door for such malicious local legislation as the Black Codes that eventually emerge. [Hunt] Jan. 1 TN Skirmish at Dandridge. Jan. 2 TN Skirmish at LaGrange. Nashville is in the grip of a smallpox epidemic, which will carry off a large number of soldiers, contraband workers, and city residents. It will be late March before it runs its course. Jan 5 TN Skirmish at Lawrence’s Mill. Jan. 10 TN Forrest’s troops in west Tennessee are said to have collected 2,000 recruits, 400 loaded Wagons, 800 beef cattle, and 1,000 horses and mules. Most observers consider these numbers to be exaggerated. “ The Mississippi Squadron publishes a list of the steamboats destroyed on the Mississippi and its tributaries during the war: 104 ships were burned, 71 sunk.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sexual Politics of Meat by Carol J. Adams
    THE SEXUAL POLITICS OF MEAT A FEMINISTVEGETARIAN CRITICAL THEORY Praise for The Sexual Politics of Meat and Carol J. Adams “A clearheaded scholar joins the ideas of two movements—vegetari- anism and feminism—and turns them into a single coherent and moral theory. Her argument is rational and persuasive. New ground—whole acres of it—is broken by Adams.” —Colman McCarthy, Washington Post Book World “Th e Sexual Politics of Meat examines the historical, gender, race, and class implications of meat culture, and makes the links between the prac tice of butchering/eating animals and the maintenance of male domi nance. Read this powerful new book and you may well become a vegetarian.” —Ms. “Adams’s work will almost surely become a ‘bible’ for feminist and pro gressive animal rights activists. Depiction of animal exploita- tion as one manifestation of a brutal patriarchal culture has been explored in two [of her] books, Th e Sexual Politics of Meat and Neither Man nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals. Adams argues that factory farming is part of a whole culture of oppression and insti- tutionalized violence. Th e treatment of animals as objects is parallel to and associated with patriarchal society’s objectifi cation of women, blacks, and other minorities in order to routinely exploit them. Adams excels in constructing unexpected juxtapositions by using the language of one kind of relationship to illuminate another. Employing poetic rather than rhetorical techniques, Adams makes powerful connec- tions that encourage readers to draw their own conclusions.” —Choice “A dynamic contribution toward creating a feminist/animal rights theory.” —Animals’ Agenda “A cohesive, passionate case linking meat-eating to the oppression of animals and women .
    [Show full text]
  • '-Siiirma"N;'Willinm -Tecl~Mseh, Soldier, B. in Lancaster, Ohio, 8 Feb., 1820
    '-siiiRMA"N;'willinm -Tecl~mseh, soldier, b. in Lancaster, Ohio, 8 Feb., 1820. His branch of the family is traced to Samuel Sherman, of Essex, England, who carne to this country in 1634 with his brother, the Rev. John Sherman, and his cousin. Capt. John Sherman. Roger Sherman. signer of the Declaration of Independence, traces his lineage to the captain, and Gen. Sherman to that of the Rev. John, whose family settled in Woodbury and Norwalk, Conn., whence some of them removed to Lancaster, Fairfield co., Ohio, in 1810. The father of Gen. Sherman was 1\ lawyer. and for five years before his death in 1829 judge of the snpreme court. His mother, who was married in 1810, was Mary Hoyt. They had eleven children. of whom William was the sixth and John the eighth. Will· iam was adopted by Thomas Ewing, and attended school in Lancaster till 1836. In July of that year he was sent as a cadet to West Point, where he was graduated in 1840 sixth in a class of forty-two members. Among his classmates was George H. Thomas. As a cadet, he is remembered as an earnest., high-spiriteo, honorable, and outspoken youth, deeply impressed, according to one of his early letters, with the grave responsibility propel']Y attaching to "serving the country." He also at that time expressed a wish to go to the far west, . out of civilization. He was commissioned as a 2d lieutenant in the Bd artillery, 1 July. 1840, and sent to Florida, where the embers of the Indian war were still smouldering.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Happenings
    Historical Happenings Dansville Area Historical Society Box 481 • Dansville, NY 14437 • 585-335-8090 Website: dansvilleareahistoricalsociety.wordpress.com Email: [email protected] VOLUME 23, No. 1 “Caretakers of Our Area History” SPRING 2015 President’s Report Dear Members and Friends, will include upgrading the computer equipment to better catalog our collection and digitize our displays. We are also The mid-point of winter has just passed and hopefully making plans to reorganize one room for a manufacturing we’re on our way to an early spring. This season has taken exhibit to highlight Foster Wheeler. us back to the memories of our youth when the snow came early and stayed until Spring. As we begin a new year, our 2015 programs are taking shape already. Our first expectations are high for an exciting year at DAHS. program will spotlight Women in Medicine on March 8th. We have scheduled it for a Sunday afternoon to make The 2015 Membership renewal forms were mailed attendance easier during this season. You will see more recently. The membership funds support the newsletter as information on this later in the Newsletter. Committees well as much of the routine maintenance of the Museum. are busy planning the events of the year including more Utilities, supplies, and insurance costs increase each year public programs, 4th grade student visits to the museum, for us as they do for you. Please complete your renewal to Christmas Concert, and the Annual Dinner Meeting. If help us meet these expenses. If you have already sent in you have suggestions for programs or projects, please call your renewal, thank you.
    [Show full text]
  • George Henry Thomas Was Appointed a Major General in the Regular Army
    George Henry Thomas was appointed a major general in the During the Civil War, Rufus Ingalls was appointed a brevet major regular army and received a formal “Thanks of Congress” for his general in both the regular and volunteer Union forces. success in driving Confederate forces from Tennessee in 1864. (Library of Congress) (Library of Congress) P. G. T. (Pierre Gustave Toutant) Beauregard was one of only William Clarke Quantrill, in Confederate uniform, was not only seven “full” generals in the Confederate Army. a notorious Civil War guerrilla but a former civilian teamster, (National Archives) gambler, and camp cook with the Utah Expedition. (Kansas Historical Society.) APPENDIX A William P. MacKinnon ROOTED IN UTAH Civil War Strategy and Tactics, Generals and Guerrillas n addition to chapter 1, another way to illus- officers—Thomas and Ingalls—displayed Itrate the connection between the Utah and some nervousness over the “irregular” nature Civil Wars (and the impact of the former on of their communications; the more flamboy- the latter) is to probe the extent to which three ant Beauregard was unabashedly assertive. very prominent West Point–trained Civil War It may be helpful to provide a brief biogra- generals had earlier tried to influence pros- phy for each of these three officers, though it ecution of the Utah campaign. They did so will not do justice to their distinguished and by gratuitously sending long memos to their varied service careers. General George Henry military superiors or, in one case, to influen- Thomas (July 31, 1816–March 28, 1870) was tial politicians. These documents contained one of the Union army’s principal command- information about alternate approaches to the ers in the Western Theater and won Union Great Basin accompanied by strategic recom- victories across Kentucky and Tennessee.
    [Show full text]
  • Loughborough, John Norton (1832–1924)
    Loughborough, John Norton (1832–1924) BRIAN E. STRAYER Brian E. Strayer, Ph.D. (University of Iowa). Strayer taught history at Jackson (MI) Junior Academy, the University of Iowa, Southern Adventist University, and Andrews University for 41 years. He has written 10 books, 120 scholarly and professional articles, 40 reviews and critiques in French and Adventist history and directed three Adventist heritage tours of New England. He writes a weekly column (“The Past Is Always Present”) in the Journal Era and shares Adventist history at camp meetings, schools, and churches. John Norton Loughborough’s seventy-two years of ministry as a pioneering evangelist, missionary, author, organizer, and administrator had a major impact on the shaping Seventh-day Adventism.1 Early Life and Education Loughborough’s ancestors, John and Hannah Loofbourrow, emigrated from England to America in 1684 and settled in New Jersey. By the early nineteenth century, their descendants, the Loofboroughs, moved to Victor Township in upstate J. N. Loughborough 2 Photo courtesy of the General Conference of Seventh-day New York. Adventists Archives. John Norton Loofborough was born on Main Street in Victor on January 26, 1832, the second son of Nathan Benson Loofborough (1802-1839), a skilled carpenter, cabinet-maker, and Methodist exhorter, and Minerva Norton (1801-1894), daughter of a wealthy local family. Together they had five children: William Kerr (b. 1827), Minerva Jane (b. 1829), John Norton (b. 1832), Eber C. (b. 1837), and Sarah Diantha (b. 1840). Since John’s grandfather and father were lay preachers in the local Methodist Episcopal Church (which they had erected in 1820), John received a thorough indoctrination in Methodist beliefs at home and in Sunday school, church services, prayer meetings, and singing classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Margaret Stafford Worth
    University of Oklahoma College of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 5-23-1888 Margaret Stafford Worth. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation H.R. Rep. No. 2292, 50th Cong., 1st Sess. (1888) This House Report is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 by an authorized administrator of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. aOTH CoNGRESS, } HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. REPORT 1st Session. { No.2292. MARGARET STAFFORD WORTH. MAY 23, 1888.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed. M.r. BLISS, from the Committee on Pensions, submitted the following REPORT: [To accompanybill S. 867.1 The Committee on Pensions, to whom was referred the bill (S. 867) granting a pension to Margaret Stafford Worth, report that the case was considered and favorably reported by the Committee on Pensions at the last Congress. This committee again report the c) aim, with the recommendation that it do pass, adopting as its report the statement of facts presented with the former report, as follows: The claimant, Miss Margaret. Stafford Worth, is the only surviving unmarried daughter ofthe distinguished Maj. Gen. WilliamJ. Worth. She is now living in the city of Washington, with seven of her fathe1·'s grandchildren to support, in great povert.y and without adequate means of subsil:;tence.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretive Plan for the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields National Historic District Project No
    Interpretive Plan for the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields National Historic District Project No. GA-2255-03-016 Prepared for the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields Foundation Prepared by John Milner Associates, Inc. and Riggs/Ward Design, PC November 2008 Interpretive Plan for the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields National Historic District Project No. GA-2255-03-016 Prepared for the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields Foundation New Market, Virginia Prepared by John Milner Associates, Inc. Architects, Landscape Architects, Archeologists, Planners West Chester, Pennsylvania with Riggs Ward Design Exhibit Designers Richmond, Virginia November 2008 The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. Shenandoah Valley Battlefields National Historic District Interpretive Plan Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ix PART I: CONTEXT FOR INTERPRETATION Chapter 1 Vision, Purpose and Background 1-1 1.1 Shenandoah Valley Battlefields National Historic District 1-1 1.2 Management and Implementation Plans 1-3 1.3 Interpretive Plan Guidelines, 2001 1-3 1.4 Goals for Providing a Meaningful Interpretive Experience 1-4 1.5 Interpretive Vision and Approach 1-5 Chapter 2 Existing Interpretation in the Valley 2-1 2.1 An Overview of Existing Interpretation 2-1 2.2 Regional Attractions 2-1 2.3 Interpretive Attractions 2-2 2.4
    [Show full text]
  • The Western Health Reform Institute
    Avondale College ResearchOnline@Avondale Science and Mathematics Book Chapters School of Science and Mathematics 11-2015 The Western Health Reform Institute Paul U. Cameron Monash University, [email protected] Lynden Rogers Avondale College of Higher Education, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://research.avondale.edu.au/sci_math_chapters Part of the Other Medicine and Health Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Cameron, P. U., & Rogers, L. J. (2015). The western health reform institute. In L. Rogers (Ed.), Changing attitudes to science within Adventist health and medicine from 1865 to 2015 (pp. 1-13). Cooranbong, Australia: Avondale Academic Press. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Science and Mathematics at ResearchOnline@Avondale. It has been accepted for inclusion in Science and Mathematics Book Chapters by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@Avondale. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Chapter 1 The Western Health Reform Institute Paul U. Cameron and Lynden J. Rogers Introduction The grand opening of the Western Health Reform Institute (WHRI) in Battle Creek, Michigan, on September 5, 1866, was a gala occasion. It was only a short time after Ellen White had focussed attention on the need for such an institution during her stirring address to the 1866 General Conference Session. Despite having limited means, some $11,000 had been raised by gift or subscription loan during a fundraising campaign spearheaded by Elders John N. Loughborough in the West and John N. Andrews in the East. On September 11 the editor of the Review and Herald, Uriah Smith, reported on the successful opening, noting that, “it was less than four short months ago, for the time when this matter first began to take practical shape among our people.”1 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Almira Russell Hancock
    University of Oklahoma College of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 3-12-1886 Almira Russell Hancock. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation H.R. Rep. No. 1023, 49th Cong., 1st Sess. (1886) This House Report is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 by an authorized administrator of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 49TH CONGRESS, } HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. {REPORT lst Session. No.1023. • ALMIRA RUSSELL HANCOCK. MARCH 12, 1886.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed. Mr. SwoPE, from the Committee on Invalid Pensions, submitted the following REPORT: [To accompany bill H. R. 5841.1 The Committee on Invalid Pensions, to whom was referred the bill (H. R. 5841) granting a pension to Alm,ira Rw;sell Hancock, having had the-same under catteful considera.tion, respectfully suMnit the following report : General Hancock was an illustrious actor in the critical hours and dark days which overshadowed the history of bis country. It will· never be disputed that he met all the demands of these great and mem­ or·able occasious with a patriotic self-consecration and with a matchless soldiership that was fruitful of good fortune to his country.
    [Show full text]