DOCSLIB.ORG

SUSTAINABILITY REPORT for Bremenports Gmbh & Co

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT for Bremenports Gmbh & Co 2013 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT for bremenports GmbH & Co. KG and the special assets Sustainability report 2013 according Sustainability report GRIto 2013 according „Port“ and „Fishing Port (Waterside)“ bremenports GmbH & Co. KG Am Strom 2 27568 Bremerhaven Germany Telephone 0049 (0)471 30901-0 www.bremenports.de construktiv, Bremen construktiv, (Reporting period: 2013) Prepared on the basis of the Sustainability Reporting Guidelines G 3.1 from the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) 2013 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT for bremenports GmbH & Co. KG and the special assets "Port" and "Fishing Port (Waterside)" TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................................................6 1 Strategy and analysis ..............................................................................................................................8 1.1 Statement from the most senior decision-maker within the organisation ............................................................. 8 1.2 Description of the key impacts, risks and opportunities ....................................................................................................11 2 Organisational profile ............................................................................................................................15 2.1 Legal form, ownership and organisational structure ..........................................................................................................15 2.2 Fields of activity, markets, brands, products and/or services ...........................................................................................16 2.3 Significant changes during the reporting period ............................................................................................................... 18 2.4 Awards received in the reporting period ...................................................................................................................................18 3 Report parameters ...................................................................................................................................19 3.1 Reporting period and reporting cycle ..........................................................................................................................................19 3.2 Report content ........................................................................................................................................................................................19 3.3 Report boundary ...................................................................................................................................................................................20 3.4 Changes from the 2012 Sustainability Report .......................................................................................................................24 4 Governance, commitments and engagement ............................................................................ 25 4.1 Governance structure and responsibility for sustainability ........................................................................................... 25 4.2 Sustainability mission statements and their implementation ..................................................................................... 27 4.3 Memberships and stakeholder management ...................................................................................................................... 33 5 Economic sustainability .......................................................................................................................40 5.1 Economic performance .................................................................................................................................................................... 40 5.2 Significant infrastructure investments for public benefit ...............................................................................................42 5.3 Indirect economic impacts ..............................................................................................................................................................44 5.4 Procurement practices ......................................................................................................................................................................46 6 Environmental sustainability .............................................................................................................48 6.1 Materials and waste ...........................................................................................................................................................................49 6.2 Water & waste water ..........................................................................................................................................................................51 6.3 Energy ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 52 6.4 Emissions & climate protection ................................................................................................................................................... 55 6.5 Opportunities & risks of climate change .................................................................................................................................59 6.6 Biodiversity ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 60 6.7 Expenditure on environmental protection ..............................................................................................................................64 The GRI indicators included in the scope of assurance are marked with the symbol in the headings and in the GRI index (annex). 4 | 5 7 Social sustainability ...............................................................................................................................65 7.1 Employees and working environment .......................................................................................................................................65 7.1.1 Employment ..................................................................................................................................................................................65 7.1.2 Benefits ............................................................................................................................................................................................67 7.1.3 Occupational health and safety ..........................................................................................................................................67 7.1.4 Training ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 69 7.1.5 Diversity and equality of opportunity ..............................................................................................................................70 7.2 Anti-corruption and compliance with the law ...................................................................................................................... 72 7.3 Responsibility for customers ...........................................................................................................................................................73 7.3.1 Health and safety of customers ..........................................................................................................................................73 7.3.2 Customer data protection ..................................................................................................................................................... 74 7.3.3 Customer satisfaction ..............................................................................................................................................................75 7.4 Impacts of operations on the social environment ..............................................................................................................76 7.4.1 Procedures for identifying impacts ..................................................................................................................................76 7.4.2 Potential positive and negative impacts ........................................................................................................................77 INDEPENDENT ASSURANCE REPORT ......................................................................................................... 82 GRI CONTENT INDEX ........................................................................................................................................84 GRI – APPLICATION LEVEL CHECK ...............................................................................................................92 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: Our sustainability strategy .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Figure 2: Sustainability motivation ....................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zuwendungsbericht 2013
    Bericht Die Senatorin für Finanzen Zuwendungsbericht 2013 Freie Hansestadt Bremen Zuwendungsbericht 2013 Impressum: Die Senatorin für Finanzen Presse & Öffentlichkeitsarbeit Rudolf-Hilferding-Platz 1 28195 Bremen Telefon: (0421) 361 - 4072 Fax: (0421) 496 - 4072 Mail: [email protected] http:/ Fachliche Informationen zu dieser Veröffentlichung: Referat 21, Anja Hentschel Telefon: (0421) 361-2087 Fax: (0421) 496-2087 Mail: [email protected] Gesamtherstellung: Druckerei der Senatorin für Finanzen Rudolf-Hilferding-Platz 1 28195 Bremen erschienen im November 2014 Die Senatorin für Finanzen Vorwort Inhaltsverzeichnis Seite I. Allgemeines ...................................................................................................................... 1 1. Stand und Perspektiven ............................................................................................... 1 2. Berichtsaufbau und Datengrundlagen .......................................................................... 2 3. Verfahren ...................................................................................................................... 4 II. Zuwendungen in 2013 .................................................................................................... 5 1. Institutionelle Förderungen ........................................................................................... 5 2. Projektförderungen ....................................................................................................... 6 3. Verwendungsnachweise
    [Show full text]
  • Änderungen Anlage 1
    Fachdienst Kreisentwicklung Regionales Raumordnungsprogramm für den Landkreis Diepholz (RROP) - 2. Entwurf - Anlagen zur Beschreibenden Darstellung Die Änderungen gegenüber der Anlage 1 zum RROP-Entwurf 2015 sind kenntlich gemacht: Änderungen eingefügt: in rot Änderungen entfallen: gestrichen Anlage 1 Gebiete gem. Kap. 4.2.1 Ziff. 02 Satz 3 Kap. 4.2.1 Ziff. 02 Satz 5 Tiret 2 Kap. 4.2.1 Ziff. 02 Satz 5 Tiret 4 Kap. 4.2.1 Ziff. 02 Satz 5 Tiret 5 Anlage 2 Zeichnerische Darstellung 2. RROP-Entwurf Anlage 1 Gebiete gem. Kap. 4.2.1 Ziff. 02 Satz 3 KL-Gebiete Bezeichnung Name Samtgemeinde Altes Amt Lemförde KL Lf-01 Hageweder und Marler Fladder KL Lf-02 Brockumer Fladder siehe auch KL DHLf-03 Lohneniederung bei Eggers Brücke Samtgemeinde Barnstorf KL BaDH-01 Lange Lohe und Dreeker Fladder KL Ba-02 Hochmoor bei Dörpel KL BsTw-01 Kattenriede Stadt Bassum KL Bs-02 Hombach bei Bünte KL Bs-03 Lindschlag Samtgemeinde Bruchhausen-Vilsen KL BV-01 Schwarmer Bruch KL BV-02 Hoyaer Weide und Umgebung KL BV-03 Meliorationslandschaft Süstedter und Uenzener Bruch KL BV-04 Bruchlandschaft Rethwiesen und Umgebung Uenzener Moor KL BV-05 Hauptkanal/ Stapelshorn KL BV-06 Bruchmühlen und Obere Eiter KL BV-07 Haendorfer Bach KL BVSi-08 Siede nördlich LSG Sünder KL BV-09 Eschenhorst KL BVSi-10 Kuhlenkamper Beeke KL BV-11 Graue, Obere und Untere Mühle KL BVSfSi-12 Trennthorst Stadt Diepholz KL DH-01 Brägeler Moor KL DH-02 Erweiterungsfläche Aschener Moor Fachdienst Kreisentwicklung 2. RROP-Entwurf Anlage 1 Bezeichnung Name KL DHLf-03 Lohneniederung bei Eggers Brücke
    [Show full text]
  • Vogelschlagverhütung Und Grünlandbewirtschaftung Am Flughafen Bremen
    Vogel und Luftverkehr, 21, 2001 Seite 59-70 Vogelschlagverhütung und Grünlandbewirtschaftung am Flughafen Bremen (Bird Strike Prevention and Grassland Management at Bremen Airport) von C. MORGENROTH, Morbach und M. PFLEGING, Osterholz-Scharmbeck Zusammenfassung: Auf der Basis des neuen Biotopgutachtens zur Vogelschlag- verhütung am Flughafen Bremen hat es grundlegende Umstellungen in der Bewirt- schaftung der Grünflächen gegeben. Die bislang übliche, von ansässigen Landwir- ten nach agrarwirtschaftlichen Gesichtspunkten ausgerichtete Behandlung der Grünflächen wich einer extensiven Langgrasbewirtschaftung, die in konsequenter Weise an Flugsicherheitsaspekten ausgerichtet ist und neuerdings von landwirt- schaftlichen Lohnunternehmern ausgeführt wird. Der Beitrag beschreibt die Aus- gangs- und derzeitige Ist-Situation und legt den Entscheidungsprozess für den Einsatz von landwirtschaftlichen Lohnunternehmern und hinsichtlich der Mähgerä- te unter Nennung organisatorischer und wirtschaftlicher Aspekte dar. Summary: With reference to the new biotope expertise on bird strike prevention at Bremen Airport fundamental changes have been introduced to the grassland man- agement. The conventional grassland management hitherto practised by local farmers guided by agricultural thinking has been replaced by extensive long-grass policy designed to meet flight safety requirements, and which as of late has been carried out by agricultural contract partners. This paper describes the original situa- tion covering the decision-making process for the employment of agricultural con- tract partners and for the operation of mowing equipment. Organisational and eco- nomic aspects are added. 1. Randbedingungen Der Flughafen Bremen liegt in der Norddeutschen Tiefebene westlich des Weser- stroms, kaum 100 km von der Nordseeküste entfernt. Im System der naturräumli- chen Gliederung ist er der Landschaftseinheit „Wesermarsch“ zugeordnet. Sie setzt sich im Wesentlichen aus dem flussparallelen, besiedelten Hochland sowie dem Werder- und dem Vieland zusammen.
    [Show full text]
  • Altes Vereinsgelände E Am Haßkampam Haßkamp Delfter Straßedelfter Straße
    8°41'15"8°41'15" 8°41'30"8°41'30" 8°41'45"8°41'45" 8°42'8°42' 8°42'15"8°42'15" 8°42'30"8°42'30" 8°42'45"8°42'45" 8°43'8°43' 8°43'15"8°43'15" 8°43'30"8°43'30" 8°43'45"8°43'45" 8°44'8°44' 8°44'15"8°44'15" 8°44'30"8°44'30" 8°44'45"8°44'45" 8°45'8°45' 8°45'15"8°45'15" 8°45'30"8°45'30" 8°45'45"8°45'45" 8°46'8°46' 8°46'15"8°46'15" 8°46'30"8°46'30" 8°46'45"8°46'45" 8°47'8°47' 8°47'15"8°47'15" 8°47'30"8°47'30" 8°47'45"8°47'45" 8°48'8°48' 8°48'15"8°48'15" 8°48'30"8°48'30" 8°48'45"8°48'45" 8°49'8°49' 8°49'15"8°49'15" 8°49'30"8°49'30" 8°49'45"8°49'45" Neuer S chutzdeich 53°4'45"53°4'45" WC Ochtum 3,2km Köhler Stau Varreler Bäke 3,7km 3,2km Sportbootschleuse 6,2km Delme 6,5km Senato Brücke Strom-Deichhausen 7,2km r-Apelt-S Grundschwelle 7,7km OchtumOchtum traße G Alter SchutzAlter Schutzdeichdeich Köhler Brücke ersten Segelvereine 8,2km eg Kornblumenw neul aße andswe Str Hempenw Sperrwerk 9,2km Gerstenneulandsweg Am Gaswerkgraben nienweg 2,7km g Simon angaster eg D Petu tisweg -Boliva Weser bei 12,8 9.7km a r-Straße Tagete Bremen- MaiswegMaisweg Clem Neustädter Bremen- Neustädter swe SeumestraßeSeumestraße Hafen Ma BegonienwBegonienwegeg 53°4'30"53°4'30" isweg Hafen g Rog Weid genw Senator-A elgrasw eg MariengraswMariengraswegeg Am GaswerAm Gaswerkk HaferwegHaferweg LiebesgraswLiebesgraswegeg pe eg eg lt-S Buchwei traße rasw erk Langer DammLanger Damm zenw chilfgrasweg S Flatterg eg Senator-Apelt-Straße Am Gasw Beim Neustadts Güterbahnhof Weize Alter SchutzAlter Schutzdeichdeich KammgrasKammgraswwegeg Hafenbahn nweg GerstenwegGerstenweg eg SchriefersSchrieferswwegeg
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT 2018 Ports of Bremen/Bremerhaven ABOUT THIS REPORT
    ENVIRONMENTAL 3 REPORT 2018 Ports of Bremen/Bremerhaven CONTENTS 0 Greenports Highlights 2016/2017 .............................................................................7 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................9 2 The ports of Bremen and their activities ..................................................................12 2.1 Own sphere ................................................................................................................14 2.2 Influence on other spheres .......................................................................................... 19 2.3 Selected KPIs for the ports of Bremen ........................................................................19 3 Environmental aspects and performance of the ports ............................................. 25 3.1 Significant environmental aspects ...............................................................................25 3.2 Environmental performance indicators (EPI) ...............................................................25 3.2.1 Operational Performance Indicator (OPI) ..................................................................... 26 3.2.2 Management Performance Indicator (MPI) .................................................................. 29 3.2.3 Environmental Condition Indicator (ECI) ....................................................................... 32 3.3 Monitoring of legal requirements .................................................................................35
    [Show full text]
  • Wasserrechtsantrag Nach § 8 WHG Für Das Wasserwerk „An Den Graften“ Unterlage Zur Festlegung Und Zur Unterrichtung Über Den Untersuchungsrahmen (§ 15 UVPG)
    Wasserrechtsantrag nach § 8 WHG für das Wasserwerk „An den Graften“ Unterlage zur Festlegung und zur Unterrichtung über den Untersuchungsrahmen (§ 15 UVPG) Stand: April 2018 Bearbeitung: Impressum: Auftraggeber Fischstr. 32-34 27749 Delmenhorst Tel: 04221 1276 – 0 E-Mail: [email protected] www.stadtwerkegruppe-del.de Bearbeitung Kiebitzweg 6 26209 Hatten-Sandkrug Tel: 04481 / 93790 - 0 e-mail: [email protected] www.agtewes.de Bearbeitung und Text Dipl. Land.-ökol. Gunda Franz Dipl.-Ing. Ewald Tewes Wasserbedarfsprognose Schwachhauser Heerstraße 67 282111 Bremen Tel.: 0421 – 3 48 54 0 Dipl.-Ing. Rolf Wischhusen Geohydrologie (Grundwasser) Ing.-Büro H.-H. Meyer; Inh.: Dipl.-Ing. Martin Meinken Parkstr. 5 31542 Bad Nenndorf Tel.: 05723 – 749 82 40 Dipl.-Ing. Martin Meinken Oberflächengewässer Dr.-Ing. Andreas Matheja Bodenkunde Dipl. Geogr. O. Duensing Stand April 2018 Stadtwerkegruppe Delmenhorst Wasserrechtsantrag nach § 8 WHG für das Wasserwerk „An den Graften“ Unterlage zur Festlegung und zur Unterrichtung über den Untersuchungsrahmen (§ 5 UVPG) Inhaltsverzeichnis Seite 1 Anlass und Aufgabenstellung .............................................................................................. 3 1.1 Anlass und Ziel des Vorhabens ............................................................................... 3 1.2 Trinkwassergewinnung in der Stadt Delmenhorst ................................................... 3 1.3 Rechtliche Grundlagen ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BBSR-Online-Publikation Nr. 3/2021
    National Progress Report BBSR- Online-Publikation 03/2021 on the implementation of the New Urban Agenda Authors Jürgen Gies Philipp Holz Jasmin Jossin Antonia Milbert André Müller Oliver Peters Henrik Scheller National Progress Report on the implementation of the New Urban Agenda A project within the research programme “General Departmental Research” conducted by the German Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community (BMI) supervised by the Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development (BBSR) within the Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning (BBR). Imprint Published by Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development (BBSR) within the Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning (BBR) Deichmanns Aue 31–37 53179 Bonn Project management Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development Division SU 3 “European Spatial and Urban Development” Dr. André Müller [email protected] Division SU 6 “Urban, Environmental and Spatial Monitoring” Antonia Milbert [email protected] Research contractor German Institute of Urban Affairs (Difu) Oliver Peters, Dr. Henrik Scheller, Dr. Jasmin Jossin, Philipp Holz, Dr. Jürgen Gies State April 2021 Picture credit Cover photo: iStock.com/Schroptschop Copying All rights reserved The publisher assumes no responsibility for the correctness, accuracy and completeness of the contents and for consideration of private rights of third parties. The views and opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the publisher. Quotation Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development (BBSR) within the Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning (BBR) (Hrsg.): National Progress Report on the implementation of the New Urban Agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Fachbeitrag WRRL
    Fachbeitrag zur Wasserrahmenrichtlinie Ersatzneubau BW 443 im Zuge der B 75 über die Varreler Bäke Seite I INHALTSVERZEICHNIS 1 Einleitung ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Veranlassung des Fachbeitrags .................................................................. 2 1.2 Rechtlicher und fachlicher Rahmen ............................................................ 2 1.3 Methodik und Vorgehensweise .................................................................... 4 1.3.1 Oberflächenwasserkörper (OWK) ................................................................... 5 1.3.2 Grundwasserkörper (GWK) ............................................................................. 8 1.3.3 Schutzgebiete ............................................................................................... 11 1.4 Datengrundlage ........................................................................................... 12 2 Zustand der Wasserkörper und Bewirtschaftungsziele ........................... 13 2.1 Identifizierung der Oberflächenwasserkörper (Einschließlich der mit diesen in Verbindung stehenden Kleingewässer), Grundwasserkörper, benachbarte Wasserkörper ..................................... 14 2.1.1 Oberflächenwasserkörper ............................................................................. 14 2.1.2 Grundwasserkörper ....................................................................................... 17 2.1.3 Schutzgebiete ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Germany Albrecht Ritschl Reform After the French Wars The
    Modern Germany Albrecht Ritschl Reform after the French Wars The French wars (1792-1815) radically altered the political map of Germany. They led to the dissolution of myriads of mostly ecclesiastical micro-territories, brought down the Holy Roman Empire, and triggered legal and social reforms on a large scale. Traditional historiography (as Nipperdey, 1994) has tended to regard Napoleon’s impact as decisive for Germany’s modernization in the 19th century. Under French occupation, feudal structures were uprooted, French civil law was introduced or imitated, and a customs barrier was erected that isolated Germany from England while the wars lasted. However, even prior to the French Revolution, Germany had been less static than it often seems. In the second half of the 18th century, industrialization gradually took hold in the commercially advanced regions along the Rhine river and in Saxony (Pollard, 1981). Population size had just recovered the losses from the Thirty Years War and kept growing steadily. Still, institutional reform advanced only slowly, with the Prussian Civil Code of 1794 and the Josefinian reforms in the Habsburg monarchy as the major exceptions. The pace of reform changed after Prussia’s defeat against France in 1806. Between 1806 and 1810, Prussia abandoned the guild system, introduced free enterprise, freed its peasantry, and reshaped its administrative system. Entry exams for Prussia’s higher civil service were created that included Adam Smith in the list of required readings. An era of economic liberalism began that lasted into the 1870s. Economic and institutional reform elsewhere in Germany often proceeded more cautiously. West of the Elbe river, liberation of the peasantry was less of an issue, as in many regions, the manor system hardly consisted in more than rental payments for farmers and in – usually detailed and restrictive – entitlements to the use of the village commons.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Constitutional Law: a Comparison Between Germany and South Africa
    Financial constitutional law: A comparison between Germany and South Africa DIRK BRAND KONRAD-ADENAUER-STIFTUNG • OCCASIONAL PAPERS • JOHANNESBURG • NOVEMBER 2006 © KAS, 2006 All rights reserved While copyright in this publication as a whole is vested in the Konrad-Adenauer- Stiftung, copyright in the text rests with the individual authors, and no paper may be reproduced in whole or part without the express permission, in writing, of both authors and the publisher. It should be noted that any opinions expressed are the responsibility of the individual authors and that the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung does not necessarily subscribe to the opinions of contributors. ISBN: 0-9802543-2-9 Published by: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung 60 Hume Road Dunkeld 2196 Johannesburg Republic of South Africa PO Box 1383 Houghton 2041 Johannesburg Republic of South Africa Telephone: (+27 +11) 214-2900 Telefax: (+27 +11) 214-2913/4 E-mail: [email protected] www.kas.org.za Editing, DTP and production: Tyrus Text and Design Printing: Stups Printing Acknowledgements The author would like to express his sincere appreciation to the Konrad- Adenauer-Stiftung for the publication of this study as well as to the University of Stellenbosch, which gave permission for the publication. iii The author Dr Dirk Brand* was a constitutional advisor in the Western Cape Provincial Government from the end of 1995 and was, among other things, coordinator of a team of technical advisors responsible for the drafting of the Western Cape Provincial Constitution, 1998. As legal advisor, Brand’s responsibilities included the drafting of legislation, such as the Western Cape Languages Act, 1998, as well as legal opinions on a variety of issues.
    [Show full text]
  • 19.5.1 UVP-Bericht 2018-04-03
    Ersatzneubau BW 3430 / A1, Brücke über die Ochtum: Seite I UVP-Bericht INHALTSVERZEICHNIS - mit Blaueintragungen - 1 Einleitung ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Anlass und Aufgabenstellung .......................................................................... 1 1.2 Rechtliche Grundlagen .................................................................................... 2 2 Beschreibung des Vorhabens mit Angaben zum Standort, zur Art, zum Umfang und zur Ausgestaltung, zur Größe und zu anderen wesentlichen Merkmalen des Vorhabens .................................................... 3 2.1 Beschreibung des Vorhabens – mit Blaueintragungen - .................................. 3 2.2 Relevante Projektwirkungen ............................................................................ 9 2.3 Darstellung des Untersuchungsrahmens ....................................................... 10 2.3.1 Ergebnis der Planungsraumanalyse .............................................................. 10 2.3.2 Abgrenzung des Untersuchungsraumes ....................................................... 11 2.3.3 Untersuchungsinhalte, methodisches Vorgehen ........................................... 14 3 Beschreibung der Umwelt und ihrer Bestandteile im Einwirkungsbereich des Vorhabens .......................................................... 21 3.1 Kurzbeschreibung des Untersuchungsraumes .............................................. 21 3.2 Ermittlung und Beschreibung der Schutzgüter
    [Show full text]
  • 15 11 17 CZ Lemf 2025 Umweltbericht Satzungsbeschluss
    Gemeinde Lemwerder Landkreis Wesermarsch Umweltbericht Flächennutzungsplan 2025 Oktober 2015 Umweltbericht zum Flächennutzungsplan 2025 Gemeinde Lemwerder Inhalt Inhalt ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 B Umweltbericht zum Flächennutzungsplan der Gemeinde Lemwerder (§ 2 (4) BauGB) .......................................................................................................................................... 3 1 Kurzdarstellung der Planung .................................................................................................. 3 2 Umweltschutzziele / fachliche Vorgaben ........................................................................... 4 3 Beschreibung und Bewertung der Umweltauswirkungen ............................................. 9 3.1 Schutzgut Mensch ............................................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Schutzgut Tiere und Pflanzen ........................................................................................................... 18 3.4 Schutzgut Boden .................................................................................................................................. 24 3.5 Schutzgut Wasser ................................................................................................................................ 26 3.6 Schutzgut Luft und Klima .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]