DOCSLIB.ORG

Gavial Virginia Polytechnic Institute

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AIAA Student Design Competition Homeland Defense Interceptor: Gavial Virginia Polytechnic Institute VersaCorp AeroSpace ... May 12, 2006 1 Executive Summary In response to the Request for Proposal [1] from the AIAA Foundation Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition, VersaCorp Aerospace from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University proudly presents Gavial, a next generation Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle, Homeland Defense Interceptor (UCAV- HDI). The Gavial meets the design mission requirements of providing superior operational capability while maximizing cost-effectiveness in all facets of the design. The Gavial is designed primarily for supersonic performance. This led to the use of a highly swept cranked arrow wing with a blended fuselage. Primary control is provided by canards and a single vertical tail. The Gavial also utilizes a single engine in the 35,000 lb thrust class. Missiles are stored externally on under-wing hard-points, and rail launched. The flyaway cost of the Gavial is ˜$15,000,000, with half˜ of that being for materials and systems. The Gavial is capable of performing three distinct missions, each contributing significantly to the aircraft’s overall mission of ensuring homeland security. The streamlined fuselage is equipped with the M61-A1 Vulcan 20mm Gatling rotary gun which is driven by the aircraft’s hydraulic system and has a maximum rate of fire of up to 7,200 shots per minute (SPM), providing the Gavial with excellent lethality during dog-fighting and pinpoint attacks. The wing undercarriage is capable of carrying a maximum of four AIM-120 advanced medium-range air-to-air missile (AMRAAM), four AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles, or a combination of two AIM- 120 missiles and up to two AIM-9s. Such arsenal versatility optimizes the Gavial’s performance in the RFP specified Defensive Counter-Air Patrol (DCAP), Intercept/Escort and Point Defense Intercept missions. The option of mounting three 660 gallon exterior fuel tanks provides the capability of fulfilling the DCAP missions four hour loiter requirement. As a supersonic performer, the Gavial is designed to minimize drag and maximize maneuverability at the design altitude of 35,000ft, out-performing many operational features of modern fighters. The inclusion of the most advanced radar and UCAV communications systems, including a portable next-generation ground station, maximizes mission effectiveness while simultaneously decreasing the overall cost of the aircraft and completely eliminating pilot risk. This highly survivable and versatile aircraft highly exceeds many of the RFP requirements with an Initial Operational Capability (IOC) date of 2020 and a flyaway cost of $15 million. i ii Summary of Requirements Criterion Requirement DCAP I/E Intercept Mission Radius 200 nm N/A Met CAP Endurance at 300 nm Radius 4 Hrs Met N/A Performance at Maneuver Weight Maximum Mach Number at 35,000 ft 2.2 Not Met 1.7 Met 2.2 Min Sustained Load Factor -at Maximum Thrust 5 g´s Met 9 g’s Met 9 g’s Max Instantaneous Turn Rate at 35,000 ft 18.0 ◦/s Met 21.2 ◦/s Met 21.2 ◦/s 1-g Specific Excess Power -Military Thrust 0.9M/Sea Level 200 ft/s Met 1401 ft/s Met 1500 ft/s 0.9M/15,000 ft 50 ft/s Met 983 ft/s Met 1000 ft/s 1-g Specific Excess Power -Maximum Thrust 0.9M/Sea Level 700 ft/s Met 896 ft/s Met 1053 ft/s 0.9M/15,000 ft 400 ft/s Met 468 ft/s Met 603 ft/s 5-g Specific Excess Power -Maximum Thrust 0.9M/Sea Level 300ft/s Met 354 ft/s Met 496 ft/s 0.9M/15,000 ft 50 ft/s Met 103 ft/s Met 215 ft/s iii Contents 1 RFP Analysis 1 1.1 Missions . 1 1.1.1 DCAP Mission . 1 1.1.2 PDI Mission . 2 1.1.3 I/E Mission . 2 1.2 Stability and Control Requirements . 3 1.3 Performance Requirements . 3 1.4 Equipment . 4 1.4.1 Engine . 4 1.4.2 Government Furnished Equipment . 4 2 Survey of Existing Aircraft 5 3 Initial Sizing 7 3.1 Wing Loading and Thrust to Weight Ratio . 7 3.2 Fuel Weight Estimation . 10 4 Conceptual Design 12 5 Configuration Description 18 6 Operational Concept 20 6.1 Manned Vs Unmanned . 20 6.2 Threat Identification, Threat Tracking, Target Verification, Kill Verification, Collision Avoidance 21 6.3 Weapons Integration . 22 6.4 Loss of Vehicle Command and/or Control . 22 6.5 Handling of Enemy Countermeasures . 22 6.6 Aircraft Launch and Recovery Scheme . 23 6.7 Items/Levels of Redundancy Required . 23 6.8 Benefits/Limitations . 23 iv 7 Ground Control Station 24 7.1 Design Objectives . 24 7.2 The Command Chair . 24 7.3 Helmet-mounted Heads Up Display (HUD) Screen . 25 7.4 Vehicle Management System (VMS) . 27 7.5 Final Layout and Platform Assembly . 29 8 Aerodynamics 31 8.1 Wing Planform . 31 8.2 Airfoil Selection . 31 8.3 High-Lift Devices . 35 8.4 Drag . 35 9 Stability and Balancing Scheme 42 9.1 Longitudinal Control . 42 9.2 Control Surfaces . 42 9.3 Canard Sizing . 43 9.4 Control Authority . 44 10 Vehicle Performance 48 11 Propulsion Design 53 11.1 Single vs Multi Engine . 54 11.2 Engine Scaling . 54 11.3 Inlet Design . 55 11.4 Shock Ramps . 56 11.5 Nozzle . 58 12 Structural Design 59 12.1 Materials Selection . 59 12.2 Fuselage Structure . 60 12.3 Wing Structure . 61 12.4 Canard and Tail Structure . 63 12.5 Landing Gear . 63 12.6 Structural Limits . 65 v 13 Weapons/Fire Control System 67 13.1 Weapons . 67 13.2 Wide Angle Cameras . 68 13.3 FLIR . 69 13.4 Radar . 69 14 Internal Systems 70 14.1 General Layout . 70 14.2 Cooling of the Avionics . 73 15 Fuel and Electrical System 74 15.1 Fuel System . 74 15.2 Electrical System . 75 16 Servicing Plan 76 16.1 Forward Avionics Access . 76 16.2 Aft Access . 76 17 Weight Parameters 79 17.1 Takeoff Gross Weight . 79 17.2 Center of Gravity . 79 17.3 Weight and Balance Analysis . 80 18 Cost Estimation 84 vi List of Figures 1.1 Defensive Counter Air Patrol Mission Schematic . 1 1.2 Point Defense Intercept Mission Schematic . 2 1.3 Intercept Escort Mission Schematic . 3 3.1 Sizing Chart for Conceptual Design . 9 4.1 Configuration Flow Chart . 12 4.2 Variable Geometry Concept . 13 4.3 Arrow Wing Concept . 14 4.4 Conventional Wing Concept . 15 4.5 Multiple Lifting Surface Concept . 16 4.6 Drag vs Sweep Angle Comparison . 17 5.1 Gavial Interceptor Configuration . 18 6.1 Operation Control Concept . ..
Recommended publications
  • US Export Controls

    US Export Controls

    U.S. Export Controls A Commerce Department Perspective EAR BOOT CAMP ECCN, EAR99 and the 600 Series Chicago, IL Oct 9, 2013 Gene Christiansen 202 482 2894 [email protected] Factors to be considered in determining if item is “subject to the EAR” • Jurisdiction – Characteristics of Item: • Nuclear---Energy, NRC, Commerce • Military---USML, Commerce • Destination Country – For Cuba, Iran, N Korea, N Sudan and Syria---OFAC • Public Domain technology and software What is covered under the Commerce Control List (CCL) • Everything not under the jurisdiction of another Agency or technical data that is not in the public domain. See part 734.3 – All items in the United States – All U.S. origin items wherever they are – Foreign made items that include in excess of de minimis value of controlled U.S. origin content. – Foreign made items that are the direct product of certain U.S. origin technical data or software. – Certain commodities produced by any plant located outside the U.S. that is the direct product of certain U.S. origin technical data or software Navigating the Commerce Control List (CCL) • The Commerce Control List – 10 categories • 0 Nuclear and miscellaneous • 1 Materials, chemicals, microorganisms, toxins • 2 Materials processing • 3 Electronics computers • 4 Computers • 5 Telecommunications and encryption • 6 Sensors • 7 Navigation and avionics • 8 Marine • 9 Propulsion systems and space vehicles Navigating the Commerce Control List • The Commerce Control List – 5 groups • A--- Equipment—end items • B--- Test and production
  • Eurofighter World Editorial 2016 • Eurofighter World 3

    Eurofighter World Editorial 2016 • Eurofighter World 3

    PROGRAMME NEWS & FEATURES DECEMBER 2016 GROSSETO EXCLUSIVE BALTIC AIR POLICING A CHANGING AIR FORCE FIT FOR THE FUTURE 2 2016 • EUROFIGHTER WORLD EDITORIAL 2016 • EUROFIGHTER WORLD 3 CONTENTS EUROFIGHTER WORLD PROGRAMME NEWS & FEATURES DECEMBER 2016 05 Editorial 24 Baltic policing role 42 Dardo 03 Welcome from Volker Paltzo, Germany took over NATO’s Journalist David Cenciotti was lucky enough to CEO of Eurofighter Jagdflugzeug GmbH. Baltic Air Policing (BAP) mis - get a back seat ride during an Italian Air Force sion in September with five training mission. Read his eye-opening first hand Eurofighters from the Tactical account of what life onboard the Eurofighter Title: Eurofighter Typoon with 06 At the heart of the mix Air Wing 74 in Neuburg, Typhoon is really like. P3E weapons fit. With the UK RAF evolving to meet new demands we speak to Bavaria deployed to Estonia. Typhoon Force Commander Air Commodore Ian Duguid about the Picture: Jamie Hunter changing shape of the Air Force and what it means for Typhoon. 26 Meet Sina Hinteregger By day Austrian Sina Hinteregger is an aircraft mechanic working on Typhoon, outside work she is one of the country’s best Eurofighter World is published by triathletes. We spoke to her Eurofighter Jagdflugzeug GmbH about her twin passions. 46 Power base PR & Communications Am Söldnermoos 17, 85399 Hallbergmoos Find out how Eurofighter Typhoon wowed the Tel: +49 (0) 811-80 1587 crowds at AIRPOWER16, Austria’s biggest Air [email protected] 12 Master of QRA Show. Editorial Team Discover why Eurofighter Typhoon’s outstanding performance and 28 Flying visit: GROSSETO Theodor Benien ability make it the perfect aircraft for Quick Reaction Alert.
  • We Make It Fly Airbus in the Pacific 03

    We Make It Fly Airbus in the Pacific 03

    AIRBUS IN THE PACIFIC WE MAKE IT FLY AIRBUS IN THE PACIFIC 03 AIRBUS GROUP ROPPONGI HILLS MORI TOWER WE MAKE IT FLY A Global Pioneer Airbus is a global leader in aeronautics, space and related services. In 2016, it generated revenues of €67 billion and employed a workforce of around 134,000. The company offers the most comprehensive range of passenger airliners from 100 to more than 600 seats. We are also a leader in tanker, combat, transport and mission aircraft, as well as Europe’s number one space enterprise and the world’s second largest space business. In helicopters, Airbus provides the most efficient civil and military rotorcraft solutions worldwide. Setting the Standard for the Aviation Industry We are the leading global manufacturer of the most innovative commercial aircraft. Our comprehensive product line comprises highly successful families of aircraft from the best-selling single aisle A320 Family to the double-deck A380. Europe’s No. 1 Defence and Space Company In Defence and Space, Airbus develops and manufactures world-class products such as the strategic airlifter A400M and the A330 Multi-Role Tanker Transport (MRTT) aircraft, versatile light aircraft like the C295 that can be deployed on various missions including transport, maritime patrol and surveillance, the world’s most advanced swing-role fighter the Eurofighter Typhoon, and satellites for missions ranging from telecommunications to earth observation and science. The World’s Leading Helicopter Manufacturer The company is the world’s No. 1 helicopter manufacturer, with a 47% share of the global civil and para-public fleet. Its civil helicopter range extends from the H120 light helicopter to the H225 Super Puma, and its military range from the H125M Fennec to the Tiger.
  • The Economic Case for Investing in Europe’S Defence Industry

    The Economic Case for Investing in Europe’S Defence Industry

    Error! No text of specified style in document. The Economic Case for Investing in Europe’s Defence Industry September 2013 - 1 - Europe Economics is registered in England No. 3477100. Registered offices at Chancery House, 53-64 Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1QU. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information/material contained in this report, Europe Economics assumes no responsibility for and gives no guarantees, undertakings or warranties concerning the accuracy, completeness or up to date nature of the information/analysis provided in the report and does not accept any liability whatsoever arising from any errors or omissions © Europe Economics. Contents 1 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Broad macroeconomic impacts of defence investment ...................................................................... 1 1.2 Unpacking the mechanisms by which defence spending affects the broader economy .............. 5 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 3 Macroeconomic Impacts................................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 GDP..............................................................................................................................................................
  • Planned Acquisition of the F-35 Lightning II

    Planned Acquisition of the F-35 Lightning II

    Chapter 4 Acquisition timeline and potential alternatives Introduction 4.1 This chapter considers the F-35A acquisition schedule, the risk of the creation of a capability gap should there be further delays to the acquisition timeline, and potential alternatives to the F-35A. Acquisition schedule 4.2 Defence advised the committee that the 'F-35 Program schedule is structured to address the resources required to deliver a highly technical and complex program' and that, as a result, the System Development and Demonstration phase is 'characterised by a concurrent design and production model'. Defence explained that 'this level of concurrency has introduced some risk' to the Program, demonstrated by the Program re-baselining and issues that have become evident during test and evaluation. 1 Defence noted that software development is 'effectively complete' and is now the 'main focus of the ongoing test and evaluation program'. Defence advised that, as at January 2016, the final software build had completed 50 per cent of baseline test points, but that 'significant test points are yet to be undertaken and issues found will need to be rectified'.2 4.3 Defence advised that the F-35 Program schedule has 'stabilised' since the re- baselining in 2012, with 'any movements being managed through schedule margins built into the Program'. However, 'completion of the test and evaluation program and ensuring the required warfighting capability at the completion of the System Development and Demonstration phase carries schedule risk that will need to be carefully
  • R&T Activities on Composite Structures

    R&T Activities on Composite Structures

    PUBLIC RELEASE R&T activities on composite structures for existing and future military A/C platforms at Airbus DS, Military Aircraft Mircea Calomfirescu, Rainer Neumaier, Thomas Körwien, Kay Dittrich Airbus Defence and Space GmbH Rechliner Str. 1 85077 Manching GERMANY [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper gives a short overview on the state of the art in composite aerostructures for civil and military aircraft. Major challenges are highlighted in this context and the requirements from military aircraft point of view are illustrated, derived from existing and future military aircraft perspectives. The main objective of the paper is to present the R&T activities in the aerostructure research program called FFS, advanced aerostructures. The activities range here from structural bonding, advanced radomes, new thermoplastic composite technologies and new materials and structures for low observability purposes. A brief insight is given to each of the topic highlighting the challenges and approaches, finishing with a summary of future trends and emerging technologies. 1.0 INTRODUCTION Composites offer several advantages over metallic aerostructures in civil as well as in military aircraft industry including reduced weight, less maintenance effort and costs due to “corrosion-free” composites and a superior fatigue behaviour compared to aluminium. The thermal expansion is much less and the material waste (“buy to fly ratio”) is more advantageous compared to aluminium structures. However, these advantages come along with higher material and manufacturing costs. For the prepreg technology for example the material has to be stored at -18°C, energy and investment intensive autoclaves are necessary and for quality assurance 100% non-destructive testing (NDT) is required in contrast to aluminium structures.
  • Weapon System of Choice 38 New Eurofighter Typhoon Aircraft for the Luftwaffe 2021 · EUROFIGHTER WORLD 2021 · EUROFIGHTER WORLD 3

    Weapon System of Choice 38 New Eurofighter Typhoon Aircraft for the Luftwaffe 2021 · EUROFIGHTER WORLD 2021 · EUROFIGHTER WORLD 3

    PROGRAMME NEWS & FEATURES JANUARY 2021 Chain Reaction Pilot Brief: Interoperability Eurofighter and FCAS Weapon System of Choice 38 new Eurofighter Typhoon aircraft for the Luftwaffe 2021 · EUROFIGHTER WORLD 2021 · EUROFIGHTER WORLD 3 Contents Programme News & Features January 2021 Welcome 4 Weapon System of Choice Airbus’ Head of Combat Aircraft Systems Kurt Rossner discusses the full implications of Germany’s decision to replace its existing Tranche 1 aircraft under the Quadriga programme. Cover: © Picture: images.art.design. GmbH, 12 Chain Reaction Lucas Westphal We speak to four businesses across Europe about the importance of the Eurofighter Typhoon programme for the Looking back, 2020 was a year few of us will ever The Eurofighter programme supports over 400 business- defence industry and the enriched technology capabilities forget. Because of the impact of the Covid-19 es across Europe, sustaining more than 100,000 jobs. it has helped bring about. pandemic we all faced huge professional and personal That’s why in this edition we shine the spotlight on some Eurofighter World is published by challenges. What stood out for me was the way every- of those supply chain businesses. Eurofighter Jagdflugzeug GmbH 18 Mission Future: Eurofighter and FCAS one involved in the Eurofighter project worked closer PR & Communications In the first of series of exclusive articles our experts exam- together than ever before to deliver. Elsewhere in the magazine we examine Eurofighter’s Am Söldnermoos 17, 85399 Hallbergmoos [email protected] ine Eurofighter’s place alongside a next generation fighter place alongside a next gen- in the future operating environment. Germany’s decision to replace eration fighter in the future Editorial Team Tony Garner its existing Tranche 1 aircraft battlespace.
  • Case Study BAE Systems Eurofighter Typhoon

    Case Study BAE Systems Eurofighter Typhoon

    Executive Summary Eurofighter Typhoon is the world’s most advanced swing-role combat aircraft. A highly agile aircraft, it is capable of ground-attack as well as air defence. With 620 aircraft on order, it is also the largest and most complex European military aviation project currently running. A collaboration between Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK, it is designed to meet air force requirements well into the 21st Century. Advanced electronics and state of the art onboard computers are critical to the Typhoon’s high performance and agility. These systems need to be safe, reliable and easily maintained over the estimated 25 year lifecycle of the aircraft. The Ada programming language was therefore the natural choice for Typhoon’s onboard computers. It provides a high-integrity, high-quality development environment with a well defined structure that is designed to produce highly reliable and maintainable real-time software. Typhoon is currently the largest European Ada project with over 500 developers working in the language. Tranche 1 of the project saw 1.5 million lines of code being created. BAE Systems is a key member of the Eurofighter consortium, responsible for a number of areas including the aircraft’s cockpit. As part of latest phase of the project (named “Tranche 2”) it needed a solution for host Ada compilation in the development of software for the Typhoon’s mission computers, as well as for desktop testing. BAE Systems selected GNAT Pro from AdaCore in 2002 for this mission-critical and safety-critical area of the project. AdaCore has been closely involved with the Ada language since its inception and was able to provide a combination of multi-language technology and world-leading support to BAE Systems.
  • Pdfcreator, Job 2

    Pdfcreator, Job 2

    F-100 for AMT Pegasus jet engine or Jet CAT P-120 / P-160 Assembly Manual NcVNaV\[-QrÅvt{ ZI le chenet, 91490 Milly La Foret, FRANCE Tel : 33 1 64 98 93 93 Fax : 33 1 64 98 93 88 E-mail : [email protected] www.adjets.com Version 01/10/2006 1 INTRODUCTION The F-100 from NcVNaV\[-QR`VT[ is designed for high thrust jet engines. It is a scale kit, with all the panel lines engraved in the fuselage and a lot of scale details (gears, hinges, cockpit...). It is fully molded in fiberglass, carbon and epoxy. The flight characteristics are excellent with low and high speed capability. The model has plug in wings, stabs and fin. F-100 is avaialable : - in ’’C’’ version with small fin and small fixed flaps - in ’’D’’ version with larger fin and large movable flaps F-100 model includes - High quality epoxy-glass fuselage painted. - All plywood and wood parts premounted. - Epoxy-glass inlet - Exhaust nozzle. - Fully molded wings, stabs and fin painted - Access hatch requiring no additional framework. - ABS cockpit interior. - Clear formed canopy. - All hardware (ball links, bearings, screws ...) - Instructions in English. To complete the kit : The following items are not included in the kit. They are available from NcVNaV\[-QR`VT[. Jet Engine : 1 Complete AMT Pegasus jet engine or 1 Jet Cat P120 or P160 Cockpit detail kit : ref : ADJ 465 This kit include : 1/7 full body jet pilot, 1/7 ejector seat & instrument panel. 2 Landing gear : ref : ADJ 467 NÑvnÇv|{-QrÅvt{ retractable landing gear is specially designed for the F-100.
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory Figures As of Sept

    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory Figures As of Sept

    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2011. ■ 2012 USAF Almanac Bombers B-1 Lancer Brief: A long-range, air refuelable multirole bomber capable of flying intercontinental missions and penetrating enemy defenses with the largest payload of guided and unguided weapons in the Air Force inventory. Function: Long-range conventional bomber. Operator: ACC, AFMC. First Flight: Dec. 23, 1974 (B-1A); Oct. 18, 1984 (B-1B). Delivered: June 1985-May 1988. IOC: Oct. 1, 1986, Dyess AFB, Tex. (B-1B). Production: 104. Inventory: 66. Aircraft Location: Dyess AFB, Tex.; Edwards AFB, Calif.; Eglin AFB, Fla.; Ellsworth AFB, S.D. Contractor: Boeing, AIL Systems, General Electric. Power Plant: four General Electric F101-GE-102 turbofans, each 30,780 lb thrust. Accommodation: pilot, copilot, and two WSOs (offensive and defensive), on zero/zero ACES II ejection seats. Dimensions: span 137 ft (spread forward) to 79 ft (swept aft), length 146 ft, height 34 ft. B-1B Lancer (SSgt. Brian Ferguson) Weight: max T-O 477,000 lb. Ceiling: more than 30,000 ft. carriage, improved onboard computers, improved B-2 Spirit Performance: speed 900+ mph at S-L, range communications. Sniper targeting pod added in Brief: Stealthy, long-range multirole bomber that intercontinental. mid-2008. Receiving Fully Integrated Data Link can deliver nuclear and conventional munitions Armament: three internal weapons bays capable of (FIDL) upgrade to include Link 16 and Joint Range anywhere on the globe. accommodating a wide range of weapons incl up to Extension data link, enabling permanent LOS and Function: Long-range heavy bomber.
  • Eurofighter Typhoon in Service

    Eurofighter Typhoon in Service

    programme news and features issue 3 - 2006 eurofighter review I Tranche 2 • Final Assembly • New Engine Control I Export News At the beginning of November, the three Eurofighter Typhoon squadrons The lead Eurofighter Typhoon was piloted by Group Captain Bob of the Royal Air Force took to the skies from the Main Operating Base Judson, with aircraft from 3(F), 17(R) and 29 Squadrons making up of RAF Coningsby for a spectacular “Diamond Nine” formation flight. the formation. It was the first time that all the aircraft included in the formation were single-seat type. Focusing on the Air Forces Eurofighter Typhoon In Service 2 3 - 2006 eurofighter review - contents - - latest news - editorial - 3 - 2006 eurofighter review 3 Aloysius Rauen Contents CEO Eurofighter GmbH 03 Editorial Welcome note from Aloysius Rauen, Chief Executive Officer Dear Friends of Eurofighter Typhoon, 04 News Latest developments 2006 marked a significant change in the Eurofighter Typhoon programme. With more 06 06 Defendory International 2006 Review than 100 aircraft delivered, the four Partner Eurofighter Typhoon in Athens Air Forces have taken full ownership of the Eurofighter exhibi- programme. Seven units are already operating tions for 2006 ended in Athens 07 Export Expertise the aircraft and, with operational conversion Eurofighter Typhoon set to serve the global market ramping up across the four Nations, Eurofighter Typhoon is becoming increasingly responsible 08 Team Italy takes the Title for more and more tasks within the squadrons. International Aerospace Summer School The four Partner Nations have accumulated more than 12,000 flight hours. 09 4°Stormo Deployment The end of our work based on the Main Operational Training for the Italian Air Force Development Contract is approaching.
  • COMPUTATIONAL AEROELASTICITY in HIGH PERFORMANCE AIRCRAFT FLIGHT LOADS* Mike Love, Tony De La Garza, Eric Charlton, Dan Egle Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company

    COMPUTATIONAL AEROELASTICITY in HIGH PERFORMANCE AIRCRAFT FLIGHT LOADS* Mike Love, Tony De La Garza, Eric Charlton, Dan Egle Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company

    ICAS 2000 CONGRESS COMPUTATIONAL AEROELASTICITY IN HIGH PERFORMANCE AIRCRAFT FLIGHT LOADS* Mike Love, Tony De La Garza, Eric Charlton, Dan Egle Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Keywords: computational aeorelasticity, CFD, flight loads Abstract A computational aeroelasticity method has been developed that combines a compu- tational fluid dynamics (CFD) code based on a finite volume, Cartesian / prismatic grid scheme with automated unstructured grid creation and adaption with established structural finite element methods. This analysis is motivated by the need to develop an analysis capability for fighter-aircraft critical flight loads. Flight conditions for such often reside in transonic flow regimes and comprise nonlinear aerodynamics due to shocks, flow-separation onset, and complex geometry. The Multidisciplinary Computa- tional Environment, MDICE [1], is provid- Figure 1: Pressures and streamlines obtained from a ing for timely integration of Lockheed computational aeroelastic maneuver simulation Martin’s CFD software, SPLITFLOW [2] in in maneuver simulations. The Loads engi- a maintenance friendly, loosely coupled neer’s time is mostly consumed in the nonlinear analysis method. Analysis corre- assembly of accurate data for the maneuver lation with static aeroelastic wind tunnel simulation. Adequate characterization of data demonstrates potential. Analysis set-up vehicle aerodynamics is critical. Recent tool and results for a fighter aircraft with multi- and technology developments are facilitating ple control surfaces are demonstrated. the aerodynamic characterization task of integrating data from CFD methods, wind 1 Introduction tunnel testing and other aerodynamic meth- ods to assemble an aerodynamic pressure Computational aeroelasticity, or computa- database [3, 4]. This database is augmented tional fluid dynamics (CFD) based aeroelas- by static aeroelastic analyses to account for ticity, is an emerging technology with high flexibility effects of the structure and inertial potential for the development of critical effects of the flight vehicle.