Participatory Small-Scale Water Resources Sector Project

Environmental Monitoring Report

Project No.39432-013 Semestral Report June 2016

BAN: Participatory Small-Scale Water Resources Sector Project

Prepared by Local Government Engineering Department for the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and the Asian Development Bank.

This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

Participatory Small Scale Water Resources Sector Project Environmental Monitoring Report (Jan-June, 2016)

1. BACKGROUND Participatory Small Scale Water Resources Sector Project (PSSWRSP) is supported by ADB-IFAD and the estimated project cost is $1119.0 million. It is being implemented by LGED within the purview of Local Governments in accordance with the provisions of the National Water Policy. The Project is a follow up of the two previous SSWRD Sector Projects (SSW-I and II) that implemented 580 subprojects from 1995 to 2009. The PSSWRSP will implement about 270 new Subproject in 46 districts of the country and to undertake performance enhancements of about 150 subprojects of SSW-I and II in 61 districts of Bangladesh, excluding three districts of Chittagong Hill Tracts from 2010-2017. The subproject types are water conservation (WC), drainage improvement (Dr), flood management (FM), and command area development (CAD). The major physical interventions in respect of these four types of subprojects will be re-excavation of khals, rehabilitation/construction of embankments and construction of water management structures like sluices, regulators, water retention structures, weirs, etc.

The overall goal of the project is to reduce the poverty level of the country by increasing sustainable agricultural and fishery production. The project’s objective is to develop sustainable stakeholder-driven small-scale water resources management system with special attention to the poorer section of the population. The project will have three outputs: i) institutional strengthening of government agencies at all levels to support PSSWR development; ii) participatory subprojects, which will include poor and vulnerable groups, and which will enable WMCAs to plan, implement, operate, and maintain subprojects; and iii) construction and maintenance of up to 270 new PSSWR subprojects and performance enhancement up to 150 subprojects (from SSW-I and II).

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF SUBPROJECTS The PSSWRSP has undertaken implementation of 270 subprojects of different categories having benefited areas of 50-1000 ha each by rehabilitation and/or upgrading of existing water management systems. The policy of ADB is to promote environmentally sustainable economic development in developing countries those use ADB’s assistance/support.

The SSWRSP has been classified as Category B. Summary and Initial Environmental Examinations (SIEE and IEEs) and environmental assessment and review procedures are done in accordance with the ADB Environmental Policy (2002) and Environmental Assessment Guidelines (2003), and the Bangladesh Government’s environmental requirements.

The Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) is prepared for each Subproject. The IEE will identify and highlight all beneficial and adverse impacts that may arise due the project implementation. These impacts based on project types are summarized in Annex- A.

3. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND MANAGEMENT Considering the impacts as outlined in Annex A, an Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan (EMMP) is being prepared for each subproject. The EMP defines how mitigation measures suggested in the IEE are being executed and monitored during the design, construction and O&M stages of the subproject.

A monitoring program for an important environmental indicator namely water quality of representative sample subprojects (approximately 25% of total subprojects) based on each

1 agro-ecological zone and subproject type will have to be carried out for a minimum period of 5 years. . A set of baseline data will have to be collected before starting operations of the of representative sample subprojects. This monitoring program will be covered by Environmental Lab Technician and Project Implementation Consultant. Also biodiversity impact monitoring for a group of subprojects shall be conducted by a contracted NGO or Consulting Firm. The results of monitoring will then be analyzed and evaluated for designing the required appropriate protective measures against any adverse impacts. Besides water quality monitoring, close supervision and monitoring will be undertaken to ensure that the PSSWRSP is being implemented in an environmentally sound and transparent manner.

4. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING OUTPUTS Output 1: Subproject IEE Report Finalization with EMP incorporation Up to June, 2016, the IEE of 270 subprojects with their respective EMP template have been finalized. The template, considering all possible impacts due to implementation activities and their mitigation measures, have been prepared to adapt to the specific requirement of the subproject (Annex-B). Output 2: Environmental Field Monitoring and Supervision Field monitoring is done to check and verify whether the subproject Contractor/LCS groups is properly implementing the Environmental Management Works as specified in the Contract Document and Bill of Quantities and adhering to the underlying principles of ADB’s Environmental Safeguard Policies.

Compliance Reporting In order to demonstrate compliance with the Contract Specifications and implementation of EMP, the CM & QC Specialists are required to investigate the environmental management issues at the site using a reporting format prepared in the form of a checklist (Annex-C) and keep records.

One of the main objectives of the Environmental Supervision and Monitoring is to ensure that the PSSWRSP is being implemented in an environmentally sound and transparent manner. This will require close supervision and monitoring at regular intervals (preferably on monthly basis).

Non-compliance Reporting Where non-compliance is registered, then a Non-Compliance Report (NCR) is prepared identifying details of the issue in question and re-medial action to be taken to correct the problem. The Format of NCR (Annex-D) can be used to identify any Non-compliance and document major observations, conclusions and recommendations.

The CM & QC Specialists will inform the contractor by the NCR and request Corrective Action to be implemented at the construction site by issuing Corrective Action Request (CAR). This CAR can also be noted either in English or in Bengali.

The subproject works involve earth works and construction of infrastructures; they normally produce construction-related impacts/issues on the immediate physical and social environment. These are mostly short-term impacts and these are:  Soil Erosion: Rehabilitation/improvement works involve clearing and removal of plants and vegetation from the site. Such clearance induces runoff erosion, and this impact is more in the rainy season.  Temporary interruption of natural drainage and local flooding: Construction of temporary diversions for traffic/equipments movement contributes to the changes in the flow of surface water, which in turn causes localized drainage congestion.

 Khal excavation/re-excavation spoils (earth): Silts/spoils may deposit on nearby crop lands from excavation/ re-excavation of khals.  Pollution from construction materials, equipments and dust: Accidental leakages of fuel, lubricant, oil, and grease from construction equipments/machineries might cause pollution to both surface and groundwater.  Increased traffic hazards: Use of various types of construction equipments/materials causes hazards to the local residents in terms of increased generation of noise and dust. Homesteads and vegetations within the vicinity of construction works suffer especially from dust pollution.  Traffic disruption: Rehabilitation/improvement works commonly involves temporary disruption of normal traffic movement.  Work site safety: Construction workers suffer health hazard due to lack of safe work environment i.e. inadequate safety measures and insufficient provision of water supply and sanitation. Output 3: Field Visit to verify the Implementation of EMP and Environmental Code of Practices (ECP) during Earth Work & Structure Construction As the part of environmental monitoring and supervision of subproject works, a number of randomly selected subprojects under PSSWRSP have been visited at intervals to verify/examine the environmental issues and their compliances to mitigation measures. However, compliances recorded in the field and non-compliance reporting in terms of adequacy to mitigation measures is outlined in Annex-E and Annex-F respectively:

Implementing of Environmental Management Plan (EMP), more specifically environmental mitigation measures in different subprojects were found to be more difficult than it was initially expected. One of the major reasons for this was the apparent lack of interest on the part of the Contractors/LCS group in the implementation of EMP/Environmental Specifications of Tender Document. It was also observed that due to lack of sufficient fund, implementation of environmental management works in some instances have become difficult. Output 4: Distribution of Subprojects for Water Quality Impact Monitoring It has been planned that 20-25% of the implemented subprojects will be selected for water quality impact monitoring program under PSSWRSP. A representative mix of subproject based on the types (i.e. drainage improvement, flood management, water conservation and command area development) and dominant agro-ecological zones are to be selected. As planned, 270 new subprojects shall be implemented under PSSWRSP. Implementation of all the subprojects has come into effect now. Out of these subprojects 25% sample of 30 subprojects have been targeted through applying random sampling technique for water quality monitoring. Already we have instructed the regional/district environmental lab technicians to undertake the routine water quality tests and send them to PMO in a prescribed format. We are expecting the water quality data from next month regularly. Output 5: Water Quality Impact Monitoring The impacts of project interventions are intended to be determined through monitoring of changes in water quality in sample subprojects. Pre-subproject data and post-subproject (once the subproject is operational) shall have to be collected. It has been planned to collect water samples on quarterly basis from 2 sites: one for surface water (from river/canal/beel/pond) and one for groundwater (hand tube well/shallow tube well/deep tube well). It has been planned that data collected during the first year will be used for establishing baseline conditions and then follow-up data of monitoring period will be compared for impact evaluation. Monitoring period should be for 5 years (from the year of implementation to the following 4 years).

The water quality parameters for this monitoring are pH, electrical conductivity (Eh), -3 dissolved oxygen (DO), nitrate-N (NO3-N), phosphate-P (PO4 ), water hardness (as CaCo3), total dissolved solids (TDS) and Temp (OC).

The water quality test results of target sample subprojects presented in (Appendix-G) (consists of pages 15).

However, the tested result of few parameters of some subprojects show higher value is compared to values of Environmental Department Standard. The details of these are given in the table below:

Noted Higher Values Compared to Values of Environmental Department Standard Environmental Subproject Water Type Parameter Value Department Standard

SP43029, Nur Ali-Burirchar Ground Nitrate (mg/L) 30 <10 Charakgachia Surface CaCo3(Hardness) 135 80~120 Barguna, Sadar (mg/L) SP43041, Sonbunia Subproject Surface Salinity (mg/L) 7520 NA Barguna, Sadar SP43043, Dehergati Subproject Surface CaCo3(Hardness) 178 80~120 Barisal, Babuganj (mg/L)

SP43049,Kafila-Krishnanagar Ground Nitrate (mg/L) 30 <10 Subproject CaCo3(Hardness) Surface 175, 165 80~120 Barisal, Bakerganj (mg/L) SP44108, Tiloch Iramoti Subproject CaCo3(Hardness) Surface 600 80~120 Bogra, Adamdighi (mg/L)

SP41010,Sawrnakhali Khal Surface Subproject Nitrate (mg/L) 136. 4 <10

Dhaka, Dhamrai SP41001, Nimai Khari Subproject Dissolved Surface 4.75, 5 4~6 Dinajpur, Sadar Oxygen(mg/L) Ground Nitrate (mg/L) 30 <10 SP44080,Chollish Kawnia Subproject CaCo3(Hardness) Jhalokathi, Rajapur Surface 135 80~120 (mg/L) Ground Nitrate (mg/L) 30 <10 SP44106, Sachilapur Subproject Phosphate (Ph4) Jhalokathi, Sadar Surface 7.7 <6 (mg/L) SP42025,Kujail-Raktadaha Surface CaCo3(Hardness) 270 80~120 Subproject (mg/L) SP42020, Ulushi Khal Subproject Phosphate (Ph4) Surface 7.24 <6 Sirajganj, Tarash (mg/L) SP43061,Bhagalpur-Montala Surface CaCo3(Hardness) Subproject 150 80~120 (mg/L) Sirajganj, Ullapara SP44090,Chota Senua khal Dissolved Surface 8.5 Subproject Oxygen(mg/L) 4~6

Thakurgaon, Sadar CaCo3(Hardness) 540 80~120 (mg/L)

No plausible reasons could be given to these variations in the tested results against Environmental Department Standard. It could be either analytical error or temporary pollution from sources not known clearly. However, it will be clear from the test analysis of the successive quarters.

Output 6: Environmental Training/Capacity Building In order to ensure effective and timely implementation of the EMP, in particular, and to enhance the environmental management capacity of Upazila Engineers, Sr. Sociologists, and Socio-economist of project districts, and WMCA members at subproject level, a training program has been developed and undertaken during project period. Once the Upazila Engineers, Sr. Sociologists, and Socio-economist staffs have received appropriate training and have gained adequate experience on environmental related matters, they are expected to train the WMCA members contractor’s staff, NGOs and other stakeholders.

The following aspects are considered in the environmental training programme:

 Integrating environmental management in O&M planning by preparing environmental management plan (EMP) for subprojects  Strengthening the theoretical and practical knowledge of LGED Environmental Lab personnel in order to facilitate smooth operation of lab exercises  Integrating environmental considerations into the effect monitoring environmental issues, impact and management  Strengthening the understanding and environmental knowledge of WMCA members through training In order to achieve the above aspects, a comprehensive environmental training program has been designed. Details of the training program have been outlined in Annex-H. Already a number of training programs has been conducted under the project during FY 2012-16, and these training details are given in Annex-I. The summary of conducted trainings is given below:

Total Participants Trainee Days No. of Environmental Training Duration Budget Conduc Codes/Title (days) (Tk.) ted Male Female Male Female Total Training PSSW-167: Environment Awareness 251 1 3813 3801 3813 3801 7614 5161000 and Local Resources Mangt. PSSW-93: Environmental Laboratory 7 3/2/1 258 - 420 - 420 1130000 and Water Quality Testing PSSW-168: TOT on Environment 14 2 376 57 752 114 866 1915423 Issues, Impact & Management PSSW-92: Training on Preparation 47 1 1091 273 1091 273 1364 3106000 and Monitoring of EMP

Further, environmental trainings planned for FY 2014-15 is shown in Annex-J. The training programs with respective course code are listed below:

Course Code Course Title PSSW-92: Preparation & Monitoring of Environmental Mitigation Plan (EMP) PSSW-93: Environmental Laboratory & Water Quality Testing: Course 1 PSSW-167: Orientation on Environmental Awareness & Local Resources management PSSW-168: TOT Environmental Issues, Impact & Management

For the sake of brevity, the above Courses Handouts are not annexed here. However, these will be made available on request.

5. PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN IMPLEMENTING EMP AND ECP Implementing of Environmental Management Plan (EMP), more specifically environmental mitigation measures in different subprojects were found to be more difficult than it was initially expected. One of the major reasons for this was apparent lack of interest on the part of many Engineers to the Contract and the Contractor in the implementation of EMP. Further most of the contractors had no trained works force to address the environmental issues or to implement the EMP/Environmental Specifications of Tender Document. It was very difficult to convince contractors to recruit trained manpower in order to be able to implement EMP/mitigation measures in subproject. It is worthwhile to point out here that sufficient funds must be allocated for environmental management works of subprojects else contractors will show little interest in the subproject related environmental issues.

As the subprojects spread over a vast rural area covering 23 districts, frequent field investigation in relation to environmental supervision and monitoring of subproject works has become difficult.

During the contract award, it was decided that contactor’s staff would conduct project environmental works with due diligence. Apparently, this did not work properly due to lack of experience and interest of contractor.

6. LESSONS LEARNT One important lesson learnt during implementation of Environmental Management Plan (EMP) and Environmental Code of Practice (ECP) was that that no matter how many environmental consultations are made with contractors and field level staff, unless there is proper institutional setup for Environmental Management all these efforts will produce limited sustainable impact.

Majority of contractors involved in implementation of PSSWRSP sub-projects have limited experience of Environmental Management of rural infrastructures. They have not recruited any Environmental Scientists or Environmental Engineers to address the environmental issues. Contractors own environmental monitoring, records of non-compliances, corrective actions taken and reporting of assessment of Environmental Management activates are hardly available as most contractors do not have trained staffs to keep these records.

As it appears, contractors, their staff and construction workers are not fully aware of Environmental and Social Safeguards in achieving desired level of Environmental Safeguard objectives of the sub-projects. Because of this, environmental issues figure low in priority and are neglected/ignored during all stages of project works.

It was also observed that some of the environmental issues could not be addressed in the design of the sub-project due to lack of sufficient funds for civil works.

7. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS It has been observed that implementation of EMP encountered problem due to inexperienced contractors bidding for projects, some contractors sub-contracting work, quoting low price to win contract, hiring of plants and machinery of low quality at low costs. These contractors gave very little importance to health and safety issues or providing better working conditions, construction of labor camps, stack yards etc. Contractors’ contract labors are mostly from rural areas with almost no experience in construction work and on health and safety issues. These labors have hardly any idea of Environmental Management, especially issues of health and work safety at work sites.

In order to incorporate EMP/ECP, Environmental Policy of ADB and Bangladesh Government should be followed by all concerned parties, including Upazila Engineer and XEN.

Environmental Management capacity both at field level of LGED and at HQ level needs to be strengthening. Institutional arrangement for Environmental Management of LGED project should be uniform for all the projects and environmental standard should be considered as important as ensuring standard of civil works.

Ensuring environmental standard should be considered as important as ensuring standard of civil works. However, this may require a long term planning. Short-term solutions will to encourage XENs/UEs to be more involved in Environmental Management of PSSWRSP sub-projects before they approve payment to contractors. XEN/UE being the Engineer to the contract should ensure proper implementation of EMP/ECP and Environmental Specification of Tender Documents.

After completion of civil works, tree plantation and tree caring should be monitored carefully. Trees are part of environmental program and used for slope stabilization and slope protection. Turfing is also an essential component of slope of protection and proper care should be ensured for its maintenance.

Annex-A

POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AT SUBPROJECTS

Beneficial Impacts Adverse Impacts Water Conservation: Storage facility and increased availability of surface water. Reduced natural fisheries production. Obstacle for the natural flushing and reduced replenishment of Development of facilities for fish culture in canals. floodplain soil resulting in loss of fertility of agricultural soil. More groundwater recharge and raised height of water table. Silt deposition near the water control structure. Provide water way transport facility. Obstruction of navigation through canals. Increased use of chemical fertilizer and pesticides and Institutional Development of water use. deterioration of water and soil quality. Reduced water flow has negative environmental effects

downstream. Command Area Development: Increased use of chemical pollution of downstream water Extended area covered by irrigation. bodies. Reduction in the use of groundwater for irrigation with Chemical pollution of downstream water bodies. decrease in arsenic related problems. Changes in cropping patterns with the introduction of new varieties. Increase in cropping intensity and crop yields. Flood Management: Protection of crops from flood damage-improved yields at Reduction of flows and water levels in rivers and canals. harvest. Obstacle to annual flushing of streams resulting in reduced Development of facilities for fish culture in canals. replenishment of soil fertility and loss in crop yields. Loss of fertile topsoil for embankment construction or re- Fish culture extension facilities in ponds and water bodies. construction. Deterioration of water quality followed by the growth of weed Improved road access. including hyacinth in borrow pits and canals leading to eutrophication. Security of assets, livelihoods and personal safety during flood Loss of natural fish production and fish biodiversity. incidents. Silt deposition near regulators and sluices. Soil erosion on river banks and constructed work. Risk of higher flood levels in adjacent unprotected areas. Hazards resulting from embankment breach-potential loss of

life. Drainage: Former water logged land available for agricultural use. Reduction of permanent and seasonal wetlands. Timely preparation of inundated land for boro (dry season) rice Loss of aquatic habitat including fisheries production and crops. biodiversity, and water fowl life. Ability to flush water borne disease bacteria. Sedimentation on canal beds. Increased use of chemical fertilizer and pesticides and

deterioration of water and soil quality. Lowering of groundwater tables and loss of soil moisture in

agricultural lands.

Annex-B Participatory Small Scale Water Resources Sector Project (PSSWRSP)

ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION PLAN (EMP)

A. Subproject Information Name : Anulia Beel- Barnai River B. Type : WCD C. Upazilla : Durgapur District : Rajshahi

D. Proposed Interventions Khal re-excavation/excavation 3.5km Construction/re-sectioning of embankment ….. 0 km Construction of Regulator/Sluice/ WRS …no Construction of Levee 0.8km Contruction of Culvert 01 no Irrigation canals: Open (pucca/earthen) ...... km Buried Pipeline ...... km E. Subproject Implementation Schedule Name of the work/activities Date Start Date End 1. Re-excavation of Khal 2014 2015-16 2. Construction of WRSs 2014 2015-16 F. Design Discussion Meeting including Environmental Mitigation Measures

Place: ...... Date: ...... Number of Project Affected People (PAPs) present: ……………………

G. Signing of Environmental Mitigation Plan (at the time of signing Implementation Agreement) Place of Signing: …………………... Date of Signing: ………………

LGED WMCA

(……..………………..) (……..………………..)

Executive Engineer, LGED Chairperson ………………… ………………… Subproject WMCA

Steps for Preparing Environmental Mitigation Plan: 1. Finding of potential impacts and identification of adverse impact issues from environmental assessment study report (IEE/EIA). 2. Cross checking of identified adverse impact issues with PRA findings. 3. Identification of PAPs from both IEE/EIA and PRA reports. 4. Presentation of identified impacts and their best possible mitigation options in meeting with PAPs and collection of their opinion in implementing the program. 5. Finalization of EMP after detail discussion with PAPs and incorporation of recommended options in the engineering design. 6. Fixing of implementation schedule for finally accepted Mitigation Plan and endorsement of the document by the concerned LGED Executive Engineer, PAPs, and representatives from WMCAs. Note: All works/activities in the signed mitigation plan should be clearly mentioned in the Implementation Agreement of the concern subproject.

Environmental Mitigation Plan

Name of the Subproject: Anulia Beel- Barnai River Union /Upazila/District: Joynagar Durgapur / Rajshahi Name of Village/Mouzas: Anulia Purba (Part), Motihar, Sukhandighi (Part), and Brahmapur (Part) Gross Area of Subproject: 600ha SI. Impact of Subproject Activities on IECs, Mitigation Measures Number Signature of Responsible Entity / Party Resources and Values of PAPs PAP During design During construction During O&M representativ e(s) Physical Environment 1. Regional Flood Regime/Hydrology  Design to ensure no induced   Proper and timely opening / Design : FSDD Firm, PC  Increase flood intensity flooding closing of regulator gates, Constrn. : -  Change in river/khal water flow and  Incorporation of adequate flow in maintaining gates and hoisting O&M : WMCA, UE flooding pattern design of hydraulic structures gears/systems in good  Enhanced flood risk in adjacent  More recharge by increasing operable condition, etc areas inundation area and period  Fall of ground water table  Increase of surface water irrigation facilities

2. Drainage /Water-logging  Design to avoid drainage   Maintaining drainage channels Design : FSDD Firm, PC  Create/increase drainage congestion congestion : in any lower area clear of fish bundhs, water Constrn. : -  Cause excessive/unwanted drainage either inside or outside the weeds/hyacinths, O&M : WMCA, UE (reducing permanent water subproject by draining upper /  Maintain Seal of gates body/affecting soil moisture) inside areas, inside subproject property and close gates  Water logging in low lying areas area due to inadequate drainage properly/timely to prevent loss  Hindrance in natural flushing path/ diversion channel during of water required to be construction; conserved,  Design to ensure no excessive drainage reducing permanent water body significantly;  Design to provide adequate drainage facilities  Design to prevent significant seepage from irrigation canal

Instructions to Complete the EMP format: 1. Put Tick () in appropriate Box/Measure to confirm the action to be taken. 2. Complete only the IECs that are identified in the IEE to have adverse impacts 3. Any action/measure to be taken other then the mentioned ones should be described against the empty boxes and the box should also be ticked ().

SI. Impact of Subproject Activities on IECs, Mitigation Measures Number Signature of Responsible Entity / Party Resources and Values of PAPs PAP During design During construction During O&M representative( s)

3. Soil Characteristics / Soil Fertility  Design for provision for natural  Ensure no top soil removal  Training to farmers on IPM /  Degradation of soil fertility due to: replenishment of flood plain soil by from fertile agricultural land ICM through DAE/SRDI removal of top soil, intensive/ diversified flood water inundation (top soil to be excavated support Design : - agriculture (increased use of inorganic and kept reserved at one  Analysis of soil samples (base fertilizers, pesticides), preventing place, take soil for data) of subprojects cultivated Constrn. : Contractor, CS nutrient rich sediment deposition on construction in shallow land and use fertilizer lands cutting from the land and application at SRDI/DAE O&M : WMCA & Line  Loss of soil fertility due to hindrance in spread the preserved top recommended doses natural replenishment of flood plain soil soil on land again;  Enhance use of organic Agency DAE by flood water inundation. manure by farmers

4. Erosion and Siltation  Design to consider existing risk and  Adopt appropriate  Include in the O & M program cause no significant induced impact construction management to special care taking of new  Increase sediment deposit on land (provide close turf on top and side minimize erosion of soil from earthwork structures under outside embankment, slopes of embankments, set sill excavations, both routine and periodic for  Erosion of loose soil from new levels of structures at lower levels or embankments/spoil deposits, the initial 2-3 years to reduce Design : FSDD Firm, PC earthwork (embankment/spoil) and use other techniques to flush out etc during rains; erosion of soil during rain and most of sediment load; deposition on nearby crop deposit ion on agricultural land Constrn. : -  Increased siltation of river/khal bed due lands. to construction of WRS, Weir, Rubber  Include in the O&M program O&M : WMCA, UE Dam, etc. removal of deposited silt from the channel bed upstream of weirs and elevated sill structures;

Biological/ Ecological Environment

5. Terrestrial Habitat:  Design considering minimum  Do not undertake  Include social afforestation Design : FSDD Firm, PC

 Removal /cutting of trees and vegetation removal / clearance of trees and unnecessary clearance of program on available land vegetation vegetation/felling trees during (roadside, khal bank, structure Constrn. : Contractor, CS,

construction site,etc) IWRMU

O&M : WMCA, CO

6. Wetland Habitat:  Design to avoid complete drying up  Ensure compliance to the  Drying up or drastic reduction of of water bodies timely operation of gates of permanent water bodies/areas  Design to minimize reduction of hydraulic structures (meant for  Significant reduction of seasonal seasonal floodplain area water conservation) Design : FSDD Firm, PC floodplain area Constrn. : -

O&M : WMCA, CO

7. Fisheries:  Consider provision of fish-pass fish   Utilization of all subproject Design : FSDD Firm, PC  Decline in natural fisheries production friendly operation to facilitate wetlands for fisheries  Reduction of fish habitat hatchling migration; production. Constrn. : -  Reduction of fish biodiversity  Design for provision of fish shelter in  Fish-friendly gate operation khals, fish sanctuary in the Beels schedule to facilitate in- O&M : WMCA, CO, line and fixing of fish net at the drainage migration of fish for breeding agency DoF structure to restrict out-migration of and spawning fish  Training on improved fisheries technology, community based culture fisheries in subproject water bodies including hatchery and restocking programme

8. Biodiversity:  Design to consider no drastic   Include social afforestation Design : PC  Loss of biodiversity (due to decrease of reduction in permanent water program on available land aquatic and terrestrial habitat) bodies, plant and forest area (roadside, khal bank, structure Constrn. : IWRMU site,etc) O&M : WMCA, CO

Social Environment

9. Land Acquisition:  Consider in the design avoidance/ Design : FSDD Firm, PC  Loss of agricultural minimization of land acquisition land/homestead area  Provision for compensation and/or Constrn. : IWRMU  Dislocation of habitat resettlement of dislocated persons  Economic livelihood disruption (PAP's) O&M : -  Minimize disruption of livelihood and provide for compensation for alternate livelihood  Borrow earth from non-cultivable land

10. Unemployment  Identification of affected  Employ local people,  Employ local people, Design : FSDD Firm, PC  Unemployment / reduction of professional group and especially women in especially women in O&M scope of employment of incorporation of in-kind construction works. activities Constrn. : Contractor, CS professional community (i.e. fisher, compensation for losses in the boat men, etc.) sub-project planning O&M : WMCA, CO

11. Navigation / Boat Plying facilities  Consider in the design boat-pass   Ensure compliance to Design : FSDD Firm, PC  Hindrance/obstruction to boat plying facility in hydraulic structure s, as for operation of hydraulic  as possible. structures for boat pass Constrn. : IWRMU

O&M : WMCA, CO

SI. Impact of Subproject Activities on Mitigation Measures Number Signature of Responsible Entity / Party IECs, Resources and Values of PAPs PAP During design During construction During O&M representative( s)  Facilities for Workers:   Provide adequate water  Design : -  Water Supply and Sanitation supply and sanitation Constrn. : Contractor, CS Facilities for Workers / toilet facilities to workers O&M : WMCA, CO  Health and Safety Measures For  Adopt appropriate safety Workers measures at work, and

 provide first aid services  Make workers aware of health risks and how to avoid these  Other Environmental Attributes 12.  Air pollution through dust generation   Spray water regularly on  Design : -

13.  Noise pollution from construction   Avoid unnecessary noise  Design : - activities near the vicinity of Constrn. : Contractor, CS  homestead areas O&M : WMCA,CO 

14.  Pollution of water from application of   Periodic analysis of Design : - high doses of inorganic fertilizers/ representative water samples Constrn. : IWRMU/Dist.XEN pesticides. (surface & groundwater) of O&M : -  subproject area 

15.  Environmentally sensitive area,  Avoid archaeological/ historical sites,   Archaeological / Historical Sites environmentally sensitive areas (Ramsar Sites:Tanguar Haor and Design : FSDD Firm, PC Hakaluki Haor; National Protected Constrn. : IWRMU area: Laua Chhara Forest /other O&M : WMCA, UE national reserve forest areas)

Executive Engineer, LGED WMCA Chairperson Date of signing:...... Place of signing: ......

Annex-C

Annex-D

Annex-E

FIELD VISIT REPORT

District Patuakhaliu

1. Mojumdar khal-Dasar khal Subproject ( SP-45187) under Galachipa Upazila

– Construction of Regulator has not been completed. – Earth work of the subproject has been finished. – Construction of O & M shed is not yet started due to low land – Re-excavation of earth work is satisfactory. – Temporary labor shed was found at site.

2. Adabaria Subproject ( SP-43057) under Bauphal Upazila

Construction of 3 nos. Regulator and O & M shed has been completed.

Earthwork of the subproject has been also finished.

Rain cut was noticed in few places. It seems desirable level of compaction has not to attained. Layer by layer compaction need to be ensured to avoid this problem.

It was found to borrow earth from the toe of the embankment for the re-sectioning work. This may cause slope failure and should be avoided.

District Barisal

1. Charadi Subproject ( SP-45173) under Bakerganj Upazila

– Construction of 2 nos. Box Culvert and O & M shed has been completed. – Earthwork of the subproject has been also finished. – Rain cut was noticed in few places. It seems desirable level of compaction has not to attained. Layer by layer compaction need to be ensured to avoid this problem. – It was found to borrow earth from the toe of the embankment for the re-sectioning work. This may cause slope failure and should be avoided. – Practice of top soil preservation was absent at site. It may lead to make the borrowing agricultural land less protective. Top soil preservation of borrowing land should be ensured. – No proper labour shed was found at site. – Proper health safety measure and first aid facilities was found unavailable at the site. Availability of these facilities at site need to be ensure immediately.

Annex-G Water Quality Impact Monitoring Report (Jan-June, 2016) Water Resources Development Project under LGED Base / Environment Water Jan- April- Subproject ID, Name & Location Year Parameter Observed Deptt. Type March(Q1) June(Q2) Range Standard SP43049, Kafila-Krishnanagar Subproject Barisal, Bakerganj Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2000 ~ 2016 Surface 2000 <2000 mg/L 2000 Temperature, oC 6 6 ~ 6 20~30 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 6 6 ~ 6 <6

SP44078, Dhankundi Subproject Bogra, Sherpur 2016 Ground Temperature, oC 31 31 ~ 31 20~30 pH 7.4 7.4 ~ 7.4 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.050

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 385 385 ~ 385 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 31 31 ~ 31 20~30 Salinity, ppm 237 237 ~ 237 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 pH 6.5 6.5 ~ 6.5 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 7.1 7.1 ~ 7.1 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 432 432 ~ 432 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.8 4.8 ~ 4.8 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 266 266 ~ 266 80~120

SP44107, Amail-Indail Subproject Bogra, Adamdighi 2016 Ground Temperature, oC 31 31 ~ 31 20~30 pH 7.3 7.3 ~ 7.3 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.050

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 357 357 ~ 357 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 31 31 ~ 31 20~30 Salinity, ppm 176 176 ~ 176 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 7.12 ~ pH 7.12 6.5 ~ 8.5 7.12 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 343 343 ~ 343 400~1000 µs/cm 4.33 ~ Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.33 4~6 4.33 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 159 159 ~ 159 80~120 SP44108, Tiloch Iramoti Subproject Bogra, Adamdighi 2016 Ground Temperature, oC 31 31 ~ 31 20~30 pH 6.3 6.3 ~ 6.3 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.050

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 99 99 ~ 99 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 31 31 ~ 31 20~30 Salinity, ppm 55 55 ~ 55 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 pH 7.1 7.1 ~ 7.1 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 259 259 ~ 259 400~1000

µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.2 4.2 ~ 4.2 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 83 83 ~ 83 80~120 SP44123, Kamarpur-Adamdighi Subproject Bogra, Adamdighi 2016 Ground Temperature, oC 31 31 ~ 31 20~30 6.25 ~ pH 6.25 6.5 ~ 8.5 6.25 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.050

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 159 159 ~ 159 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 31 31 ~ 31 20~30 Salinity, ppm 171 171 ~ 171 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 7.12 ~ pH 7.12 6.5 ~ 8.5 7.12 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 339 339 ~ 339 400~1000 µs/cm 4.02 ~ Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.02 4~6 4.02 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 98 98 ~ 98 80~120

SP44139, Bhadraboti-Tilkatala Subproject Bogra, Sherpur 2016 Ground Temperature, oC 31 31 ~ 31 20~30 7.23 ~ pH 7.23 6.5 ~ 8.5 7.23 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.050

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 355 355 ~ 355 <2000 mg/L

Temperature, oC 31 31 ~ 31 20~30 Salinity, ppm 172 172 ~ 172 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 pH 7.6 7.6 ~ 7.6 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 447 447 ~ 447 400~1000 µs/cm 4.34 ~ Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.34 4~6 4.34 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 135 135 ~ 135 80~120

SP25247, Bawa Chhara Subproject Chittagong, Mirsharai Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Ground 91 106 91 ~ 160 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 25 26 24 ~ 26 20~30 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 6 6 6 ~ 6 <6 pH 6.3 5.7 5.7 ~ 6.3 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 160 160 160 ~ 180 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 3.6 4.2 3.6 ~ 4.2 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 76 92 76 ~ 92 80~120

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 220 91 ~ 220 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 24 24 ~ 25 20~30 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 6 6 ~ 6 <6 pH 6.8 6.3 ~ 6.8 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 190 160 ~ 190 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.6 3.6 ~ 4.6 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 90 76 ~ 90 80~120

SP41007, Harwalchari Subproject Chittagong, Fatikchari Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 220 250 220 ~ 250 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 25 26 25 ~ 26 20~30 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 6 6 6 ~ 6 <6 pH 7.4 7.1 7.1 ~ 7.4 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 212 210 210 ~ 212 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.6 4.6 4.6 ~ 4.6 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 98 90 90 ~ 98 80~120

SP43056, Latifpur- Etbarpur Khal Subproject Comilla, Chandina Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 260 125 125 ~ 290 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 20 28 20 ~ 28 20~30 Salinity, ppm 187 90 90 ~ 187 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 1 ~ 1 <6 pH 7 6.5 6.5 ~ 7.1 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 217 187 187 ~ 390 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 406 3.2 3.2 ~ 406 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 75 60 60 ~ 80 80~120 Arsenic, mg/L 0.05 0.005 .005 ~ .05 0.05

SP43059, Kedarpur-Gobindapur Subproject Comilla, Chandina Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 562 125 125 ~ 562 <2000 mg/L 18.5 ~ Temperature, oC 18.5 28 20~30 28.4 Salinity, ppm 407 90 90 ~ 407 300~1000

Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 pH 7 6.4 6.4 ~ 7.3 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 835 188 188 ~ 835 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 5.3 2.4 2.4 ~ 5.3 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 210 90 73 ~ 210 80~120 Arsenic, mg/L 0.005 0.01 .005 ~ .01 0.05

SP45147, Barkarai-Derpar Kaduti Subproject Comilla, Chandina Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 330 330 ~ 330 <2000 mg/L 28.8 ~ Temperature, oC 28.8 20~30 28.8 Salinity, ppm 238 238 ~ 238 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 pH 6.4 6.4 ~ 6.4 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 496 496 ~ 496 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 5.6 5.6 ~ 5.6 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 120 120 ~ 120 80~120 .005 ~ Arsenic, mg/L 0.005 0.05 .005

SP45156, Orain Golicho Noagaon Subproject Comilla, Chandina 2016 Surface pH 6.9 ~ 6.9 6.5 ~ 8.5

SP45176, Deowra CAD Subproject Comilla, Muradnagar Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 476 ~ 476 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 22.1 ~ 20~30

22.1 Salinity, ppm 342 ~ 342 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 ~ 1 <6 pH 7.3 ~ 7.3 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 712 ~ 712 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 5.2 ~ 5.2 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 95 ~ 95 80~120 Arsenic, mg/L .01 ~ .01 0.05

SP45177, Dhakshin Trish CAD Subproject Comilla, Muradnagar Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 190 ~ 190 <2000 mg/L 21.3 ~ Temperature, oC 20~30 21.3 Salinity, ppm 137 ~ 137 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 ~ 1 <6 pH 7.5 ~ 7.5 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 284 ~ 284 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 3.8 ~ 3.8 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 110 ~ 110 80~120 .005 ~ Arsenic, mg/L 0.05 .005

SP45190, Nababpur- Kaliarchar Subproject Comilla, Chandina Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 213 213 ~ 213 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30 Salinity, ppm 153 153 ~ 153 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6

pH 6.5 6.5 ~ 6.5 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 320 320 ~ 320 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 3.3 3.3 ~ 3.3 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 60 60 ~ 60 80~120 .005 ~ Arsenic, mg/L 0.005 0.05 .005

SP23045, Manukhali Subproject Dhaka, Dhamrai Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 92 92 ~ 92 <2000 mg/L 24.5 ~ Temperature, oC 24.5 20~30 24.5 Salinity, ppm 76 76 ~ 76 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 3.7 3.7 ~ 3.7 <6 pH 6.7 6.7 ~ 6.7 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 149 149 ~ 149 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.5 4.5 ~ 4.5 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 93 93 ~ 93 80~120

SP23060, Alam Khali Subproject Dhaka, Dhamrai Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 136 136 ~ 136 <2000 mg/L 24.5 ~ Temperature, oC 24.5 20~30 24.5 Salinity, ppm 64 64 ~ 64 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 3.6 3.6 ~ 3.6 <6 pH 6.2 6.2 ~ 6.2 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 128 128 ~ 128 400~1000

µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.6 4.6 ~ 4.6 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 92 92 ~ 92 80~120 Arsenic, mg/L 0 0 ~ 0 0.05

SP41010, Sawrnakhali Khal Subproject Dhaka, Dhamrai Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 110 110 ~ 110 <2000 mg/L 24.3 ~ Temperature, oC 24.3 20~30 24.3 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 3.3 3.3 ~ 3.3 <6 pH 6.4 6.4 ~ 6.4 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 153 153 ~ 153 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.9 4.9 ~ 4.9 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 86 86 ~ 86 80~120

SP41001, Nimai Khari Subproject Dinajpur, Sadar 2016 Ground Temperature, oC 21 21 ~ 21 20~30 pH 7 7 ~ 7 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 7 7 ~ 7 <10 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.050

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 440 440 ~ 440 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 22 22 ~ 22 20~30 Salinity, ppm 88 88 ~ 88 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 4.5 4.5 ~ 4.5 <6 pH 6.6 6.6 ~ 6.6 6.5 ~ 8.5 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 500 500 ~ 500 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 5 5 ~ 5 4~6

Arsenic, mg/L 98 98 ~ 98 0.05

SP44099, Nona River Subproject Dinajpur, Birol 2016 Ground Temperature, oC 19 19 ~ 19 20~30 pH 7 7 ~ 7 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 6 6 ~ 6 <10 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.050

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 450 450 ~ 450 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 18 18 ~ 18 20~30 Salinity, ppm 80 80 ~ 80 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 5.5 5.5 ~ 5.5 <6 pH 7 7 ~ 7 6.5 ~ 8.5 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 500 500 ~ 500 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 5.5 5.5 ~ 5.5 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 88 88 ~ 88 80~120

SP44118, Tilai Khal Subproject Dinajpur, Phulbari 2016 Ground Temperature, oC 19 19 ~ 19 20~30 pH 6.8 6.8 ~ 6.8 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 7 7 ~ 7 <10 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.050

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 600 600 ~ 600 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 20 20 ~ 20 20~30 Salinity, ppm 20 20 ~ 20 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 4 4 ~ 4 <6 pH 6.6 6.6 ~ 6.6 6.5 ~ 8.5 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 550 550 ~ 550 400~1000

µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 6 6 ~ 6 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 100 100 ~ 100 80~120

SP46244, Tulshi Timohini Subproject Dinajpur, Nawabganj 2016 Ground Temperature, oC 21 21 ~ 21 20~30 pH 6.7 6.7 ~ 6.7 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 7 7 ~ 7 <10 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.050

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 550 550 ~ 550 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 18 18 ~ 18 20~30 Salinity, ppm 70 70 ~ 70 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 5 5 ~ 5 <6 pH 7.3 7.3 ~ 7.3 6.5 ~ 8.5 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 330 330 ~ 330 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 5.5 5.5 ~ 5.5 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 80 80 ~ 80 80~120

SP11008, Bogail Chowkighata DR Subproject Faridpur, Bhanga Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 181 181 ~ 181 <2000 mg/L 27.4 ~ Temperature, oC 27.4 20~30 27.4 pH 7.3 7.3 ~ 7.3 6.5 ~ 8.5 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 253 253 ~ 253 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 8.8 8.8 ~ 8.8 4~6

SP23069, Nalijuri Khal Subproject Gazipur, Kaliganj

2016 Ground pH 6.9 6.9 ~ 6.9 6.5 ~ 8.5 Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 3 3 ~ 3 4~6

SP23099, Noli Khal Subproject Gazipur, Kaliganj 2016 Ground pH 7.1 7.1 ~ 7.1 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 3 3 ~ 3 <10

2016 Surface pH 6.9 6.9 ~ 6.9 6.5 ~ 8.5 Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.3 4.3 ~ 4.3 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 95 95 ~ 95 80~120

SP41008, Gosinga-Sitalakha Subproject Gazipur, Sreepur 2016 Ground pH 6.8 6.8 ~ 6.8 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 4 4 ~ 4 <10

2016 Surface pH 6.8 6.8 ~ 6.8 6.5 ~ 8.5 Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.5 4.5 ~ 4.5 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 110 110 ~ 110 80~120

SP13079, Ichali WCS Subproject Jessore, Sadar Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Ground 440 440 ~ 440 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 27 27 ~ 27 20~30 6.74 ~ pH 6.74 6.5 ~ 8.5 6.74 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 660 660 ~ 660 400~1000 µs/cm 2.46 ~ Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 2.46 4~6 2.46 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 358 358 ~ 358 80~120

Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.050

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 230 230 ~ 230 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 6.28 ~ pH 6.28 6.5 ~ 8.5 6.28 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 344 344 ~ 344 400~1000 µs/cm 2.87 ~ Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 2.87 4~6 2.87 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 218 218 ~ 218 80~120

SP15281, Padma Beel FCD Subproject Jessore, Jhikargacha Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Ground 618 618 ~ 618 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 6.56 ~ pH 6.56 6.5 ~ 8.5 6.56 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 328 328 ~ 328 400~1000 µs/cm 4.28 ~ Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.28 4~6 4.28 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 345 345 ~ 345 80~120 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.050

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 374 374 ~ 374 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 26 26 ~ 26 20~30 7.34 ~ pH 7.34 6.5 ~ 8.5 7.34 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10

Electrical Conductivity (EC), 561 561 ~ 561 400~1000 µs/cm 3.46 ~ Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 3.46 4~6 3.46 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 234 234 ~ 234 80~120 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.05

SP24144, Dolpur-Mukteshwary Khal Subproject Jessore, Sadar Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Ground 423 423 ~ 423 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 6.42 ~ pH 6.42 6.5 ~ 8.5 6.42 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 635 635 ~ 635 400~1000 µs/cm 4.08 ~ Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.08 4~6 4.08 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 382 382 ~ 382 80~120 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.050

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 256 256 ~ 256 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 7.06 ~ pH 7.06 6.5 ~ 8.5 7.06 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 384 384 ~ 384 400~1000 µs/cm 1.36 ~ Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 1.36 4~6 1.36 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 127 127 ~ 127 80~120

SP24156, Gobra Beel - Batoker Beel Subproject Jessore, Sharsha Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 3.25 ~ 2016 Ground 3.25 <2000 mg/L 3.25 Temperature, oC 27 27 ~ 27 20~30 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 6.64 ~ pH 6.64 6.5 ~ 8.5 6.84 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 488 488 ~ 488 400~1000 µs/cm 4.12 ~ Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.12 4~6 4.12 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 410 410 ~ 410 80~120 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.050

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 262 262 ~ 262 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 6.64 ~ pH 6.5 ~ 8.5 6.64 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 394 394 ~ 394 400~1000 µs/cm 2.81 ~ Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 2.81 4~6 2.81 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 258 258 ~ 258 80~120

SP15261, Satbaria-Dharampur DR & WCS Subproject Kushtia, Bheramara Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Ground 570 570 ~ 570 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <6

pH 7.5 7.5 ~ 7.5 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 13 13 ~ 13 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 690 690 ~ 690 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 3.5 3.5 ~ 3.5 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 140 140 ~ 140 80~120 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.050

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 280 280 ~ 280 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <6 pH 7.4 7.4 ~ 7.4 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 12 12 ~ 12 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 395 395 ~ 395 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.6 4.6 ~ 4.6 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 130 130 ~ 130 80~120 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.05

SP41005, Kanakdia FMD Subproject Patuakhali, Bauphal 2016 Ground Temperature, oC 25 25 ~ 25 20~30

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 172 172 ~ 172 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30 Salinity, ppm 80 80 ~ 80 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 pH 7.1 7.1 ~ 7.1 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 186 186 ~ 186 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 6 6 ~ 6 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 60 60 ~ 60 80~120

SP43050, Moddah-Purba Rajapur Subproject Patuakhali, Bauphal 2016 Ground Temperature, oC 25 25 ~ 25 20~30

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 190 190 ~ 190 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30 Salinity, ppm 139 139 ~ 139 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 pH 7.1 7.1 ~ 7.1 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 260 260 ~ 260 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 6.7 6.7 ~ 6.7 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 90 90 ~ 90 80~120

SP43057, Adabaria Subproject Patuakhali, Bauphal 2016 Ground Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 219 219 ~ 219 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 29 29 ~ 29 20~30 Salinity, ppm 144 144 ~ 144 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 pH 7.3 7.3 ~ 7.3 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 342 342 ~ 342 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 5.1 5.1 ~ 5.1 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 90 90 ~ 90 80~120

SP43058, Shabupura Khal Subproject

Patuakhali, Bauphal 2016 Ground Temperature, oC 26 26 ~ 26 20~30

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 237 237 ~ 237 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30 Salinity, ppm 169 169 ~ 169 300~1000 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 355 355 ~ 355 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 5.1 5.1 ~ 5.1 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 90 90 ~ 90 80~120

SP43060, Ponahura Subproject Patuakhali, Bauphal 2016 Ground Temperature, oC 26 26 ~ 26 20~30

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 162 162 ~ 162 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30 Salinity, ppm 84 84 ~ 84 300~1000 pH 6.9 6.9 ~ 6.9 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 10 10 ~ 10 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 260 260 ~ 260 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 6.2 6.2 ~ 6.2 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 60 60 ~ 60 80~120

SP25207, Hialer Beel Subproject Rangpur, Mithapukur Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Ground 690 690 ~ 690 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6

pH 7 7 ~ 7 6.5 ~ 8.5 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 348 348 ~ 348 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 3 3 ~ 3 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 90 90 ~ 90 80~120 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.050

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 140 140 ~ 140 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 pH 7.6 7.6 ~ 7.6 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 162 162 ~ 162 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 5.5 5.5 ~ 5.5 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 112 112 ~ 112 80~120 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.05

SP25321, Harol Beel Subproject Rangpur, Mithapukur Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Ground 720 720 ~ 720 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 pH 7 7 ~ 7 6.5 ~ 8.5 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 352 352 ~ 352 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 3.5 3.5 ~ 3.5 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 92 92 ~ 92 80~120 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.050

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 160 160 ~ 160 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30

Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 7.56 ~ pH 7.56 6.5 ~ 8.5 7.56 Nitrate, mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 222 222 ~ 222 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 5.2 5.2 ~ 5.2 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 120 120 ~ 120 80~120 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.05

SP43071, Bokrabari Subproject Rangpur, Mithapukur Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Ground 692 692 ~ 692 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 pH 7 7 ~ 7 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 0 0 ~ 0 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 336 336 ~ 336 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 3 3 ~ 3 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 92 92 ~ 92 80~120 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.050

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 150 150 ~ 150 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 7.62 ~ pH 7.62 6.5 ~ 8.5 7.62 Nitrate, mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 155 155 ~ 155 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 5.2 5.2 ~ 5.2 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 110 110 ~ 110 80~120

Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.05

SP44092, Faridpur Badurerjan Subproject Rangpur, Mithapukur Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Ground 710 710 ~ 710 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 pH 7.2 7.2 ~ 7.2 6.5 ~ 8.5 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 336 336 ~ 336 400~1000 µs/cm

Total Dissolved solids (TDS), 2016 Surface 136 136 ~ 136 <2000 mg/L Temperature, oC 28 28 ~ 28 20~30 Phosphate (Ph4), mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <6 7.58 ~ pH 7.58 6.5 ~ 8.5 7.58 Nitrate, mg/L 1 1 ~ 1 <10 Electrical Conductivity (EC), 156 156 ~ 156 400~1000 µs/cm Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 5.4 5.4 ~ 5.4 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 110 110 ~ 110 80~120 Arsenic, mg/L 0.01 .01 ~ .01 0.05

SP23107, Ratanganj-Gandhina Subproject Tangail, Kalihati 2016 Ground pH 6.9 6.9 ~ 6.9 6.5 ~ 8.5 Nitrate, mg/L 20 20 ~ 20 <10

2016 Surface pH 6.1 6.1 ~ 6.1 6.5 ~ 8.5 Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.3 4.3 ~ 4.3 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 98 98 ~ 98 80~120

SP25277, Bankurtala-Kalimajani Subproject

Tangail, Mirzapur 2016 Ground pH 6.8 6.8 ~ 6.8 6.5 ~ 8.5 Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 28 28 ~ 28 4~6

2016 Surface pH 6.2 6.2 ~ 6.2 6.5 ~ 8.5 Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.7 4.7 ~ 4.7 4~6 CaCo3(Hardness), mg/L 104 104 ~ 104 80~120

25-07- Data updated on : Page -1 of 1 2016 \\adta-server\MIS Reports\MIS Reports (PSSW)\Water Quality\Water Quality Report - NEW.rpt

Annex-J ENVIRONMENTAL TRAINING PLANED FOR FY 2015-16 Participant Total Total Allocation Sl. Duration No. of Tentative Tentative Course Code Course Title Category of Participants s per Participant Trainee (in Lakh Remarks No. (day) Batches Venue Date course s days Tk.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Preparation Monitoring of Field Engr. Socio RTC/ Aug 15- 1 PSSWR-92 Environmental Mitigation Economist, CO, CA Mem. of 1 25 20 500 500 12.00 District May 16 Plan (EMP) WMCA/MC. Environmental Laboratory Selected LGED Lab RTC/ Aug 15- 2 PSSWR-93 and Water Quality Testing: Technicians, Lab Asstt. & 3 20 8 160 480 15.36 District May 16 Course-1 Agri/Fish Facl. Orientation on Environmental WMCA members and Field Level Aug 15- 3 PSSWR-167 Awareness and Local general beneficiaries, 1 30 80 2400 2400 24.00 (WMCA May 16 Resources Management including women Office) Asstt. Engr. UE, Sr. TOT on Environmental Sociologist, Socio Eco. RTC/ Aug 15- 4 PSSWR-168 Issues, Impact & Selected WMCA 2 30 12 360 720 14.40 District May 16 Management Chairman/Secretary/Women members Sub Total 120 3420 4100 65.76

Annex-I