Received: 25 July 2018 | Revised: 24 January 2019 | Accepted: 25 January 2019 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4987 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Biogeography of the xerophytic genus Anabasis L. (Chenopodiaceae) Maximilian Lauterbach1,2,3 | Marie Claire Veranso‐Libalah1,2 | Alexander P. Sukhorukov4 | Gudrun Kadereit1,2 1Institut für Molekulare Physiologie, Johannes Gutenberg‐ Abstract Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany Aim: Using the extremophile genus Anabasis, which includes c. 28 succulent, xero‐ 2 Institut für Organismische und Molekulare phytic C species, and is widely distributed in arid regions of Northern Africa, Arabia, Evolutionsbiologie, Johannes Gutenberg‐ 4 Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany and Asia, we investigate biogeographical relationships between the Irano‐Turanian 3School of Molecular Sciences, University of floristic region (ITfr) and its neighboring regions. We test whether the spread of arid Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia and semi‐arid biomes in Eurasia coincides with the biogeography of this drought‐ 4Department of Higher Plants, Biological Faculty, Moscow Lomonosov State adapted genus, and whether the ITfr acted as source area of floristic elements for University, Moscow, Russia adjacent regions. Correspondence Location: Deserts and semi‐deserts of Northern Africa, Mediterranean, Arabia, West Maximilian Lauterbach, School of Molecular and Central Asia. Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia. Methods: Four cpDNA markers (rpL16 intron, atpB‐rbcL, trnQ‐rps16, and ndhF‐rpL32 Email:
[email protected] spacers) were sequenced for 58 accessions representing 21 Anabasis species. Funding information Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times were inferred using maximum likeli‐ GEOCYCLES; Russian Fond for Basic hood and a time‐calibrated Bayesian approach. To document the extant distribution Research, Grant/Award Number: 18‐04‐00029 of Anabasis, material from 23 herbaria was surveyed resulting in 441 well‐docu‐ mented collections used for the coding of eight floristic regions.