DOCSLIB.ORG

Factionalism and Conversion in Pueblo Mission Villages, AD 1620

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A People Apart: Factionalism and Conversion in Pueblo Mission Villages, A.D. 1620–1680 The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:40046493 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA A People Apart: Factionalism and Conversion in Pueblo Mission Villages, A.D. 1620–1680 A dissertation presented by Adam David Stack to the Department of Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Archaeology Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts April 2017! ! ! ! ! This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc-sa/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA.! Dissertation Advisor: Professor Matthew Liebmann Adam David Stack A People Apart: Factionalism and Conversion in Pueblo Mission Villages, A.D. 1620–1680 Abstract This dissertation investigates how Ancestral Pueblo villages in the U.S. Southwest responded to the imposition of Franciscan missions during the early Spanish colonial era (ca. A.D. 1620–1680). It sets out to investigate how narratives about missionization have been constructed, and to critically examine the ways that two phenomena – factionalism and religious conversion – have been deployed in explaining indigenous social dynamics during this period. It then analyzes evidence for links between mission residents and other Native groups and the landscape to evaluate established narratives about difference and conflict within mission villages. In order to realize these goals, this study examines obsidian artifacts from the Ancestral Towa village of Pecos Pueblo (LA 625) and the Ancestral Hopi village of Awat’ovi (AZ J: 7:1[ASM]), two of the largest pueblos in the Southwest at the time of European arrival. The construction of large Franciscan missions has been linked to the residential division of these sites. Analysis of obsidian artifacts using portable X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (pXRF) was conducted to investigate whether and how these spatial divisions relate to social conflict and differentiation. Patterns of obsidian procurement and exchange point towards relationships with the landscape and with other indigenous groups that could be impacted by factionalism and conversion. !iii The results suggest that missionization contributed to changes in how Pueblo villages interacted with the landscape and with other communities, but that these impacts were unevenly experienced between different mission villages and among groups within villages. Residential groups at Pecos were distinguished by the range of obsidian sources to which they had direct or indirect access, and by the strength of ties to significant places in the landscape. At Awat’ovi, obsidian procurement both increased and diversified over time. It may have helped sustain connections with important ancestral and mythological places, even as these places also became implicated in colonial labor regimes. Obsidian from distant sources may have arrived in conjunction with population movements that arose from the upheaval of colonial rule. This project consequently suggests rethinking how factionalism and conversion shaped indigenous responses to European colonialism in the Americas.! !iv TABLE OF CONTENTS I Introduction…………………………………………………………….……………………1 II Histories of Pecos Pueblo and Awat’ovi………………………………………………12 Pecos…………………………………………………………….……………………12 Awat’ovi…………………………………………………………….……………………33 III New Directions in Mission Archaeology…………………………………………………………….……………………53 Missions and Spanish Colonial Expansion…………………………………………………………….……………………55 Historiography and Early Archaeology of Missions…………………………………………………………….……………………63 Approaches to the Archaeology of Colonialism…………………………………………………………….……………………68 Recent Mission Archaeology…………………………………………………………….……………………74 IV Factionalism and the Pueblo Past…………………………………………………………….……………………91 Anthropological Approaches to Factionalism…………………………………………………………….……………………91 Pueblo Factionalism…………………………………………………………….……………………98 Implications for the Study of the Pueblo Past…………………………………………………………….……………………112 V Religious Conversion in Colonial Missions…………………………………………………………….……………………118 Contemporary Models of Conversion…………………………………………………………….……………………123 Native Conversions in the Colonial Americas…………………………………………………………….……………………124 Towards Indigenous Perspectives on Conversion…………………………………………………………….……………………135 VI Previous Research…………………………………………………………….……………………140 Pecos…………………………………………………………….……………………141 Awat'ovi…………………………………………………………….……………………150 VII Data and Analysis…………………………………………………………….……………………157 Research Objectives…………………………………………………………….……………………157 Obsidian…………………………………………………………….……………………158 Obsidian Sources…………………………………………………………….……………………171 Methodology…………………………………………………………….……………………183 Pecos…………………………………………………………….……………………185 !v Results…………………………………………………………….……………………188 Awat'ovi…………………………………………………………….……………………202 Results…………………………………………………………….……………………204 Interpretation…………………………………………………………….……………………213 VIII Conclusions…………………………………………………………….……………………226 Appendix A: XRF Data for Obsidian from Pecos and Awat’ovi…………………………………………………………….……………………242 Appendix B: Obsidian Source Data…………………………………………………………….……………………267 Bibliography…………………………………………………………….……………………272 !vi FIGURES 1.1 Historic Pueblo language groups and villages …………………………………………………2 2.1 The northern Rio Grande and Upper Pecos River Valleys ……………………………13 2.2 Major archaeological sites in the Upper Pecos River Valley…………………………………………………………….……………………14 2.3 The Ancestral Hopi region…………………………………………………………….……………………35 2.4 Settlements on the Hopi mesas ca. A.D. 1500…………………………………………………………….……………………36 3.1 Selected pre-Revolt missions established in the Pueblo world …………………………………………………………….……………………59 6.1 Ground plan of Awat’ovi drawn by Fewkes…………………………………………………………….……………………152 7.1 Southwestern obsidian source areas discussed in the text…………………………………………………………….……………………172 7.2 Obsidian source groups in the Jemez Mountains…………………………………………………………….……………………174 7.3 Obsidian sources in the San Francisco Volcanic Field…………………………………………………………….……………………177 7.4 Obsidian sources in the Mt. Taylor Volcanic Field…………………………………………………………….……………………179 7.5 The Mule Creek obsidian source area…………………………………………………………….……………………180 7.6 Pecos site plan…………………………………………………………….……………………190 7.7 Pecos in relation to Jemez Mountain obsidian sources…………………………………………………………….……………………192 7.8 Site plan of Awat’ovi showing areas excavated by the Peabody Expedition…………………………………………………………….……………………205 7.9 Awat’ovi in relation to nearest obsidian sources…………………………………………………………….……………………208 !vii TABLES 2.1 Occupational history of the Upper Pecos Valley…………………………………………………………….……………………16 2.2 Timeline of European contact and colonization at Pecos Pueblo…………………………………………………………….……………………22 2.3 Occupational history of the Hopi mesas…………………………………………………………….……………………37 2.4 Timeline of European contact and colonization at Awat’ovi…………………………………………………………….……………………43 3.1 Selected pre-Revolt missions established in the Pueblo world…………………………………………………………….……………………57 4.1 Ethnographically observed episodes of Pueblo factionalism…………………………………………………………….……………………92 6.1 Previous investigations at Pecos Pueblo…………………………………………………………….……………………142 6.2 Previous investigations at Awat’ovi…………………………………………………………….……………………151 7.1 Archaeological contexts of provenienced obsidian artifacts at Pecos Pueblo…………………………………………………………….……………………191 7.2 Geological sources of obsidian artifacts at Pecos Pueblo…………………………………………………………….……………………192 7.3 Geological sources of obsidian artifacts from North Pueblo contexts…………………………………………………………….……………………193 7.4 Geological sources of obsidian artifacts from South Pueblo contexts…………………………………………………………….……………………193 7.5 Pecos: Variation by technological type…………………………………………………………….……………………194 7.6 Pecos: Form by geological source…………………………………………………………….……………………195 7.7 Obsidian from funerary contexts at Pecos…………………………………………………………….……………………201 7.8 Archaeological contexts of obsidian artifacts at Awat’ovi…………………………………………………………….……………………207 7.9 Geological sources of obsidian artifacts at Awat’ovi…………………………………………………………….……………………208 7.10 Contexts of exotic obsidian at Awat’ovi…………………………………………………………….……………………212 !viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply grateful to the many people who so generously gave their wisdom, time, and support to make this dissertation possible. I certainly could not have done it without the unfailing guidance of my advisor, Matt Liebmann, to whom I owe an enormous debt for steering me out of the doldrums and towards New Mexico. Throughout this project, he was always ready, with limitless patience and encouragement, to help me when I lost sight of the way ahead. It was a privilege to learn from such a creative scholar, and I have been inspired by his heartfelt dedication to teaching and collaboration. I am also profoundly grateful to Gary Urton, a truly brilliant thinker, who fundamentally shaped my interest in the colonial Americas and my commitment to interdisciplinary research. I will always treasure his
Recommended publications
  • Tribal Higher Education Contacts.Pdf

    Tribal Higher Education Contacts.Pdf

    New Mexico Tribes/Pueblos Mescalero Apache Contact Person: Kelton Starr Acoma Pueblo Address: PO Box 277, Mescalero, NM 88340 Phone: (575) 464-4500 Contact Person: Lloyd Tortalita Fax: (575) 464-4508 Address: PO Box 307, Acoma, NM 87034 Phone: (505) 552-5121 Fax: (505) 552-6812 Nambe Pueblo E-mail: [email protected] Contact Person: Claudene Romero Address: RR 1 Box 117BB, Santa Fe, NM 87506 Cochiti Pueblo Phone: (505) 455-2036 ext. 126 Fax: (505) 455-2038 Contact Person: Curtis Chavez Address: 255 Cochiti St., Cochiti Pueblo, NM 87072 Phone: (505) 465-3115 Navajo Nation Fax: (505) 465-1135 Address: ONNSFA-Crownpoint Agency E-mail: [email protected] PO Box 1080,Crownpoint, NM 87313 Toll Free: (866) 254-9913 Eight Northern Pueblos Council Fax Number: (505) 786-2178 Email: [email protected] Contact Person: Rob Corabi Website: http://www.onnsfa.org/Home.aspx Address: 19 Industrial Park Rd. #3, Santa Fe, NM 87506 (other ONNSFA agency addresses may be found on the Phone: (505) 747-1593 website) Fax: (505) 455-1805 Ohkay Owingeh Isleta Pueblo Contact Person: Patricia Archuleta Contact Person: Jennifer Padilla Address: PO Box 1269, Ohkay Owingeh, NM 87566 Address: PO Box 1270, Isleta,NM 87022 Phone: (505) 852-2154 Phone: (505) 869-9720 Fax: (505) 852-3030 Fax: (505) 869-7573 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.isletapueblo.com Picuris Pueblo Contact Person: Yesca Sullivan Jemez Pueblo Address: PO Box 127, Penasco, NM 87553 Contact Person: Odessa Waquiu Phone: (575) 587-2519 Address: PO Box 100, Jemez Pueblo,
  • Utah Historical Quarterly, Use of the Atomic Bomb

    Utah Historical Quarterly, Use of the Atomic Bomb

    78 102 128 NO. 2 NO. I VOL. 86 VOL. I 148 179 UHQ 75 CONTENTS Departments 78 The Crimson Cowboys: 148 Remembering Topaz and Wendover The Remarkable Odyssey of the 1931 By Christian Heimburger, Jane Beckwith, Claflin-Emerson Expedition Donald K. Tamaki, and Edwin P. Hawkins, Jr. By Jerry D. Spangler and James M. Aton 165 Voices from Drug Court By Randy Williams 102 Small but Significant: The School of Nursing at Provo 77 In This Issue General Hospital, 1904–1924 By Polly Aird 172 Book Reviews & Notices 128 The Mountain Men, the 179 In Memoriam Cartographers, and the Lakes 182 Contributors By Sheri Wysong 183 Utah In Focus Book Reviews 172 Depredation and Deceit: The Making of the Jicarilla and Ute Wars in New Mexico By Gregory F. Michno Reviewed by Jennifer Macias 173 Juan Rivera’s Colorado, 1765: The First Spaniards among the Ute and Paiute Indians on the Trail to Teguayo By Steven G. Baker, Rick Hendricks, and Gail Carroll Sargent Reviewed by Robert McPherson 175 Isabel T. Kelly’s Southern Paiute Ethnographic Field Notes, 1932–1934, Las Vegas NO. 2 NO. Edited by Catherine S. Fowler and Darla Garey-Sage I Reviewed by Heidi Roberts 176 Mountain Meadows Massacre: Collected Legal Papers Edited by Richard E. Turley, Jr., Janiece L. Johnson, VOL. 86 VOL. and LaJean Purcell Carruth I Reviewed by Gene A. Sessions. UHQ Book Notices 177 Cowboying in Canyon Country: 76 The Life and Rhymes of Fin Bayles, Cowboy Poet By Robert S. McPherson and Fin Bayles 178 Dime Novel Mormons Edited by Michael Austin and Ardis E.
  • The Use of Building Technology in Cultural Forensics: a Pre-Columbian Case Study

    The Use of Building Technology in Cultural Forensics: a Pre-Columbian Case Study

    92 ARCHITECTURE: MATERIAL AND IMAGINED The Use of Building Technology in Cultural Forensics: A Pre-Columbian Case Study M. IVER WAHL, AIA University of Oklahoma INTRODUCTION Corners" area ofthe American Southwest is perhaps the most unique building form of the Anasazi culture, but it does not This paper poses the possibility that as early as 750 AD, seem to exist in Mesoamerica. In the world of architecture, technology transfer may have taken place between Pre- this argues significantly against significant Mesoamerican/ Columbian Peru and the Anasazi culture in UtaWColorado. Anasazi ''diffusion" theories. The possibility of such a cultural link became apparent to The prevailing theory for the "in-situ" evolution of the this researcher in 1976 while executing graduate field work kiva building type was proposed by John Otis Brew in 1946. in Central America; however, further study has awaited Brew dismissed outside cultural diffusion as necessary to adequate funding. If such transfer existed, the probable route kiva development based on his field studies at Alkali Ridge, would seem to have been from Peru north along the Pacific Utah. Briefly his theory traces the shift from the Basket I11 coast, then up the Colorado River to the San Juan area of pit house (used as a domestic residence), to the ceremonial UtaWColorado. kiva configuration common to Pueblo I1 period of the Anasazi culture. His study of this subject is thorough, and PURPOSE continues to largely accepted by archaeologists. However, The first objective of this study has been to determine if this this well-developed theory did not specifically address the tentative hypothesis is sufficiently plausible to warrant unique "corbeled-dome" or "cribbed roof structure used at further testing.
  • Noel Morss, 1904-1981

    Noel Morss, 1904-1981

    344 AMERICAN ANTIQUITY [Vol. 47, No. 2,1982] NOEL MORSS, 1904-1981 Noel Morss died on April 24, 1981, at the age of 77. An attorney, he was a practitioner of that uniquely Bostonian profession of "Trustee," which means he managed his own and other peo­ ple's money in effective and profitable ways. Because of the skill of these "trustees," Boston- ians, and New Englanders in general, have been able to accomplish so much during the last hun­ dred years or so. To archaeologists, however, he is the scholar who defined the Fremont Culture of eastern Utah. He began archaeological fieldwork in the mid-1920s in northern Arizona, on the Kaibito and Rainbow plateaus and in the Chinle Valley, under the inspiration of Samuel J. Guernsey and A. V. Kidder. While most of the young students of that time devoted themselves to the traditional "Southwest" of the San Juan River drainage and south­ ward into northern Arizona and New Mexico, Morss's curiosity led him northward into the can­ yons of the Colorado, Green, and Grand rivers and the mesas overlooking them. He was more and more impressed by the progressive variations on the Pueblo theme that were found as one moved northward in Utah and the continued underlying presence of the Basketmaker Culture. Barrier Canyon, the Fremont River, the Kaiparowitz Plateau, and, in northeastern Utah, Hill and Willow creeks on the East Tavaputs and the western tributaries of the Green; Range Creek, Nine Mile Can­ yon, and Minnie Maude—all these provided him with the materials from which the Fremont Culture was woven.
  • Draft Long Walk National Historic Trail Feasibility Study / Environmental Impact Statement Arizona • New Mexico

    Draft Long Walk National Historic Trail Feasibility Study / Environmental Impact Statement Arizona • New Mexico

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Draft Long Walk National Historic Trail Feasibility Study / Environmental Impact Statement Arizona • New Mexico DRAFT LONG WALK NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Thanks to the New Mexico Humanities Council and the Western National Parks and Monuments Association for their important contributions to this study. DRAFT LONG WALK NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Apache, Coconino, Navajo Counties, Arizona; Bernalillo, Cibola, De Baca, Guadalupe, Lincoln, McKinley, Mora, Otero, Santa Fe, Sandoval, Torrance, Valencia Counties, New Mexico The purpose of this study is to evaluate the suitability and feasibility of designating the routes known as the “Long Walk” of the Mescalero Apache and the Navajo people (1862-1868) as a national historic trail under the study provisions of the National Trails System Act (Public Law 90-543). This study provides necessary information for evaluating the national significance of the Long Walk, which refers to the U.S. Army’s removal of the Mescalero Apache and Navajo people from their homelands to the Bosque Redondo Reservation in eastern New Mexico, and for potential designation of a national historic trail. Detailed administrative recommendations would be developed through the subsequent preparation of a comprehensive management plan if a national historic trail is designated. The three criteria for national historic trails, as defined in the National Trails System Act, have been applied and have been met for the proposed Long Walk National Historic Trail. The trail routes possess a high degree of integrity and significant potential for historical interest based on historic interpretation and appreciation.
  • New Mexico's Tribal Collaboration

    New Mexico's Tribal Collaboration

    1 New Mexico’s Tribal Collaboration Act: What are the Impacts of a Legislative Imperative for State And Tribal Relations?1 By Linda Moon Stumpff PhD Abstract: The 23 Tribes of New Mexico have a long history of intergovernmental relations beginning with inter-tribal relationships among diverse Tribes and extending to the periods of Spanish colonial rule, Mexican rule, and finally establishing the federal relationship with the United States. The 23 recognized Tribes constitute over 10% of the State’s population. Tribes are represented in both legislative and executive branches of New Mexico today in a continuously evolving relationship. Although the relationship continues to be strengthened through the self-determination and self-governance initiatives carried out by Tribes, it has also become politicized. This case explores the history of the development of tribal relationships with the State of New Mexico, the resulting impacts, and lessons about intergovernmental relationships. A Brief History This case explores the question of how state government-to-government relationships affect both tribal and state sovereignty and the conditions that impact the effectiveness of state-tribal institutional development in New Mexico. Many different models for state-tribal relations exist and more continue to emerge (Kaufmann, et. aI., Smith, 2018). In New Mexico formal state-tribal relations began in 1953 when the Commission on Indian Affairs and the Office of Indian Affairs were created by legislative statute. A major change occurred when Governor Richardson elevated the Director of the Office of Indian Affairs to the level of his Cabinet in 2003. This was the culmination of years of changing federal policy and the increasing importance of state-tribal relations.
  • Free PDF Download

    Free PDF Download

    ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST CONTINUE ON TO THE NEXT PAGE FOR YOUR magazineFREE PDF (formerly the Center for Desert Archaeology) is a private 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization that explores and protects the places of our past across the American Southwest and Mexican Northwest. We have developed an integrated, conservation- based approach known as Preservation Archaeology. Although Preservation Archaeology begins with the active protection of archaeological sites, it doesn’t end there. We utilize holistic, low-impact investigation methods in order to pursue big-picture questions about what life was like long ago. As a part of our mission to help foster advocacy and appreciation for the special places of our past, we share our discoveries with the public. This free back issue of Archaeology Southwest Magazine is one of many ways we connect people with the Southwest’s rich past. Enjoy! Not yet a member? Join today! Membership to Archaeology Southwest includes: » A Subscription to our esteemed, quarterly Archaeology Southwest Magazine » Updates from This Month at Archaeology Southwest, our monthly e-newsletter » 25% off purchases of in-print, in-stock publications through our bookstore » Discounted registration fees for Hands-On Archaeology classes and workshops » Free pdf downloads of Archaeology Southwest Magazine, including our current and most recent issues » Access to our on-site research library » Invitations to our annual members’ meeting, as well as other special events and lectures Join us at archaeologysouthwest.org/how-to-help In the meantime, stay informed at our regularly updated Facebook page! 300 N Ash Alley, Tucson AZ, 85701 • (520) 882-6946 • [email protected] • www.archaeologysouthwest.org ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST SPRING 2014 A QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF ARCHAEOLOGYmagazine SOUTHWEST VOLUME 28 | NUMBER 2 A Good Place to Live for more than 12,000 Years Archaeology in Arizona's Verde Valley 3 A Good Place to Live for More Than 12,000 Years: Archaeology ISSUE EDITOR: in Arizona’s Verde Valley, Todd W.
  • Oak Creek Canyon

    Oak Creek Canyon

    ' " United States (. Il). Department of \~~!J'~~':P Agriculture CoconinoNational Forest Service ForestPlan Southwestern Region -""""" IU!S. IIIII.IIIIII... I I i I--- I I II I /"r, Vicinity Map @ , " .. .' , ",', '. ',,' , ". ,.' , ' ' .. .' ':':: ~'::.»>::~: '::. Published August 1987 Coconino N.ational Forest Land and Resource Management Plan This Page Intentionally Left Blank Coconino Foresst Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Plan. 1 Organization of the Forest Plan Documentation. 2 Planning Area Description. 2 2. ISSUES Overview . 5 Issues . 5 Firewood . 6 Timber Harvest Levels. 7 The Availability of Recreation Options . 8 Off-Road Driving . 9 Wildlife Habitat . 9 Riparian Habitat . 11 Geothermal Development . .. 11 Management of the Transportation System . 12 Use of the Public Lands . 13 Law Enforcement . 13 Landownership Adjustment . 14 Opportunities . 14 Public Affairs . 14 Volunteers . 15 3. SUMMARY OF THE ANALYSIS OF THE MANAGEMENT SITUATION Overview . 17 Prior Allocations . 18 4. MANAGEMENT DIRECTION Overview . 21 Mission . 21 Goals . 21 Objectives . 26 Regional Guide/Forest Plan . 26 Outputs & Range of Implementation . 26 Management Prescriptions . 46 Management Area Description . 46 Management Emphasis . 46 Program Components . 46 Activities . .. 47 Standards and Guidelines . 47 How to Apply Prescriptions . .. 47 Coordinating Requirements . .. 47 Coconino National Forest Plan – Partial Cancellation of Amendment No. 15 -3/05 Replacement Page i Coconino Forest Plan Table of Contents continued Standards and Guidelines . 51 Forest-wide . 51 MA 1 Wildernesses . 98 MA 2 Verde Wild and Scenic River . .. 113 MA 3 Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Less Than 40 Percent Slopes. .. 116 MA 4 Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Greater Than 40 Percent Slopes. 138 MA 5 Aspen . 141 MA 6 Unproductive Timber Land .
  • Pueblo Indian Water Rights: Charting the Unknown

    Pueblo Indian Water Rights: Charting the Unknown

    Volume 57 Issue 1 Water Governance, Winter 2017 Winter 2017 Pueblo Indian Water Rights: Charting the Unknown Richard W. Hughes Recommended Citation Richard W. Hughes, Pueblo Indian Water Rights: Charting the Unknown, 57 Nat. Resources J. 219 (2017). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol57/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Richard W. Hughes PUEBLO INDIAN WATER RIGHTS: CHARTING THE UNKNOWN ABSTRACT This article examines the so-far-unsuccessful efforts to judicially define and quantify the water rights appurtenant to the core land holdings of the 19 New Mexico Pueblos, many of whose lands straddle the Rio Grande. It explains that the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals has squarely held that Pueblo water rights are governed by federal, not state law, and are prior to those of any non-Indian appropriator, but also that the Tenth Circuit acknowledged that it could not say how those rights should be characterized. Part I of the article examines the course of the cases that have sought to achieve this elusive goal. Of the first six cases, filed half a century ago, three ended in negotiated settlements and none of them has yielded a definitive ruling on the nature or measure of Pueblo rights. Of the three cases filed since then, only one is in active litigation on the Pueblo rights issue, but that case may finally lead to a substantive ruling.
  • The Federal Government, New Mexico, and Tribes in the Wake of Cheromiah

    The Federal Government, New Mexico, and Tribes in the Wake of Cheromiah

    Volume 38 Issue 2 Spring Spring 2008 Indian Self-Determination: The Federal Government, New Mexico, and Tribes in the Wake of Cheromiah Reed C. Easterwood Recommended Citation Reed C. Easterwood, Indian Self-Determination: The Federal Government, New Mexico, and Tribes in the Wake of Cheromiah, 38 N.M. L. Rev. 453 (2008). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmlr/vol38/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The University of New Mexico School of Law. For more information, please visit the New Mexico Law Review website: www.lawschool.unm.edu/nmlr INDIAN SELF-DETERMINATION: THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, NEW MEXICO, AND TRIBES IN THE WAKE OF CHEROMIAH REED C. EASTERWOOD* I. BACKGROUND Legal fictions have long been important tools in evolving group expectations and protected rights within a political process.' The "sovereign equality of the states" to the federal government is a legal fiction.2 So too is the designation of the American Indian Tribe as a "dependent domestic nation" endowed with inherent sovereignty, yet defeated by conquest.3 These two fictions have been important engines in developing settled expectations with respect to both sovereigns under the United States.4 But historically, state and tribal sovereigns have operated against one another in asserting and evolving their respective substantive law and rights.' This opposition between States and Tribes was a product of Anglo American "conquest," which culminated in the writing of the United States Constitution.6 The federal government mutually excluded the laws of States and Tribes from one another at its inception. Common law tradition codified in the absolute federal sovereign would apply more or less to the States, subject to the States' consent.
  • PILT Overview

    PILT Overview

    New Mexico Counties Revenue Stabilization & Tax Policy Committee September 21, 2018 ISSUE: In the United States, county governments must provide services on a property tax base that is restricted by the tax-exempt status of federal lands within their boundaries. Instead of authorizing taxation, Congress usually has chosen to create various payment programs designed to compensate for this lost tax revenue. Payments from Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) and the Secure Rural Schools & Community Self-Determination Act (SRS) are an essential source of revenues that enable county governments to meet their financial obligations and provide services to their constituents. PILT PROGRAM: - The Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) program was created in 1976 to provide payments to counties and other local governments to offset losses in tax revenues due to the presence of substantial acreage of federal land in their jurisdictions. - Even though county governments are not able to collect property taxes on federal land, they must still provide essential services such as law enforcement, fire protection and emergency medical services, health care, road and bridge maintenance, search and rescue, solid waste disposal, and environmental compliance. - PILT is primarily a western states issue. Federally-Owned Land Eligible for PILT Compensation: . Bureau of Land Management (BLM) . Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) . National Park System (NPS) . National Forest System (NFS) . National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS) . Army Corps of Engineers (COE) . Certain Army Installations Land Not Eligible for PILT Compensation . Department of Energy . National Aeronautics and Space Administration . Department of Homeland Security . Most Military Lands . Tribal and Native American Lands FORMULA CONSIDERATIONS: . PILT Agency Acres .
  • United States V. Alexander Frank Torivio; Criminal Complaint

    United States V. Alexander Frank Torivio; Criminal Complaint

    , Case 1:10-mj-01206-RLP Document 1 Filed 04/22/10 Page 1 of 9 AO 91 (Rev. 5185) Criminal Complaint FILED At Albuquerque NM United States District Court APR 2 Z 2010 IN THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICf.\AT'fH!W J. CYKMAN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CLERK v. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT ALEXANDER FRANK TORIVIO Year of Birth: 1986 SSN: XXX-XX-7008 CASE NUMBER /1/1(5 / J-tP6 (Name and Address of Defendant) I, the undersigned complainant being duly sworn state the following is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. On or about April, 2009, and October. 2009 in Cibola county, in the District of ___ -"N",e"'w!...!,!M"e"'x"'ic"'o'--_______ defendant(s) did I (Track Statutory Language of Offense) unlawfully engage in a sexual act with Jane Doe, an enrolled member ofthe Navajo tribe, who had attained the age of 12 years but had not attained the age of 16 years, and who was at all times four years younger than the defendant, said incident having occurred within the confines of the exterior boundaries of the Pueblo of Laguna Indian Reservation and the Pueblo of Acoma Indian Reservation, respectively, Indian Country, the defendant also being an enrolled member of the Pueblo of Acoma. in violation of Title ~1,-,,8,--_ United States Code. Section(s) 2243 (a), 2246 (2)(A), 1153. I further state that I am a(n) Special Agent and that this complaint is based on the following facts: Official Title See Attached Affidavit hereby incorporated by reference as if fully restated herein.