DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record—House H11013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congressional Record—House H11013 September 27, 2007 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H11013 over their own nation. They want U.S. fact is,’’ he says, ‘‘the Iraq war has (Ms. WATERS addressed the House. troops out. kept us from devoting assets we need Her remarks will appear hereafter in Real leadership in Iraq means bring- to fight terrorists worldwide, as evi- the Extensions of Remarks.) ing our troops home and offering hu- denced by the fact that Osama bin f manitarian assistance to the people of Laden is still on the loose and al Qaeda The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a Iraq. We must join with the inter- has been able to rebuild. We need an ef- previous order of the House, the gen- national community to provide relief, fective strategy that takes the fight to tleman from California (Mr. DREIER) is reconstruction, and reconciliation. our real enemies abroad, and the best recognized for 5 minutes. This is the only way forward for Iraq. way to do that is to get our troops out (Mr. DREIER addressed the House. Force and occupation will not rebuild of the middle of the civil war in Iraq.’’ His remarks will appear hereafter in Iraq. It will not provide healthier com- Is Brandon Friedman a phony? the Extensions of Remarks.) munities. And most importantly, it Or Josh Gaines, who earned the Glob- f will not provide a peaceful future for al War on Terrorism Expeditionary the people of Iraq. Medal and the National Defense Serv- The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a Bring our troops home. Bring hope to ice Medal during his 2 years in Iraq, he previous order of the House, the gentle- our military families at home and the believes the war in Iraq was a mistake woman from New York (Mrs. MCCAR- Iraq families yearning for peace. from the beginning. Is he a phony? Or THY) is recognized for 5 minutes. retired General William Odom, the (Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York ad- f dressed the House. Her remarks will The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a head of the National Security Agency during the Reagan administration. His appear hereafter in the Extensions of previous order of the House, the gen- Remarks.) tleman from Indiana (Mr. BURTON) is advice: ‘‘The sensible policy is not to recognized for 5 minutes. stay the course in Iraq. It is rapid f (Mr. BURTON of Indiana addressed withdrawal, re-establishing strong re- PUBLICATION OF THE RULES OF the House. His remarks will appear lations with our allies in Europe, show- THE SELECT COMMITTEE TO IN- hereafter in the Extensions of Re- ing confidence in the U.N. Security VESTIGATE THE VOTING IRREG- marks.) Council, and trying to knit together a ULARITIES OF AUGUST 2, 2007, large coalition, including the major f 110TH CONGRESS states of Europe, Japan, South Korea, The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a China and India to back a strategy for The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the gen- stabilizing the area from the eastern previous order of the House, the gen- tleman from Oregon (Mr. DEFAZIO) is Mediterranean to Afghanistan to Paki- tleman from Massachusetts (Mr. recognized for 5 minutes. stan.’’ General Odom says: ‘‘Until the DELAHUNT) is recognized for 5 minutes. (Mr. DEFAZIO addressed the House. United States withdraws from Iraq and Mr. DELAHUNT. Mr. Speaker, in accord- His remarks will appear hereafter in admits its strategic error, no such coa- ance with clause 2(a) of rule XI of the Rules the Extensions of Remarks.) lition can be formed. Thus those fear of the House of Representatives, I respectfully f leaving a mess are actually helping submit the rules of the Select Committee to In- vestigate the Voting Irregularities of August 2, RUSH LIMBAUGH’S ‘‘PHONY make things worse while preventing a 2007 for printing in the CONGRESSIONAL SOLDIER’’ COMMENT new strategic approach with some promise of success.’’ RECORD. The Select Committee adopted these The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a Does Rush Limbaugh really want to rules by voice vote, a quorum being present, previous order of the House, the gentle- look General Odom in the eye and call at our organizational meeting on September woman from Illinois (Ms. SCHAKOWSKY) him a phony? I believe that we should 27, 2007. is recognized for 5 minutes. all pay attention to the views of Bran- RULES OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE TO INVES- Ms. SCHAKOWSKY. Well, Rush don Friedman and Josh Gaines and TIGATE THE VOTING IRREGULARITIES OF AU- Limbaugh is at it again. Unable to de- GUST 2, 2007, 110TH CONGRESS, ADOPTED SEP- General Odom whose beliefs, like their TEMBER 27, 2007 fend an indefensible war in Iraq, he has military experience, are real. And Resolved, That the Rules of the Select Com- once again resorted to ‘‘sliming’’ the while we’re at it, let’s pay attention to messenger. In this case, unbelievably, mittee to Investigate the Voting Irregular- the 72 percent of American troops serv- ities of August 2, 2007 shall be as follows: Ex- the messengers he’s going after are the ing in Iraq who also think the U.S. brave men and women who have served cept as provided in paragraphs (1)—(4), rule should exit the country within the next XI and clause 2(c) of rule XIII of the Rules of their country in Iraq, Afghanistan, and year, and more than one in four who the House of Representatives shall be rules other wars. say the troops should leave imme- of the Select Committee. Men and women who serve in Iraq diately, according to the Zogby poll. I (1) Regular Meeting Days. If the House is differ from Rush Limbaugh in two crit- guess they’re all a bunch of phonies, in session, the Committee shall meet on the first Thursday of each month at 9 a.m. for ical ways. First, unlike Mr. Limbaugh, according to Rush Limbaugh. they actually served in the military. the consideration of any pending business. If Our military men and women deserve the House is not in session on that day and Second, unlike Mr. Limbaugh, they un- respect. Apparently, however, Mr. derstand that the war in Iraq is mak- the Committee has not met during such Limbaugh thinks they deserve to be month, the Committee shall meet at the ear- ing our country less safe and destroy- smeared and belittled unless they hap- liest practicable opportunity when the House ing the military. pen to agree with him. I understand is again in session. The Chairman may, at How dare Rush Limbaugh label any- why Rush Limbaugh cannot debate his discretion, cancel, delay, or defer any one who has served in the military as a this war on the merits, but bashing sol- meeting required under this section, after ‘‘phony soldier.’’ How dare he say that consultation with the Ranking Minority diers and veterans who disagree with Member. his views in Iraq, formed in the com- him is unpatriotic and un-American. fort of his radio studio, are legitimate, (2) Questioning Witnesses. The chairman, while the views of those whose opinions f with the concurrence of the ranking minor- ity member, may permit an equal number of were forged on the battlefield are not. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the gen- majority and minority members to question Could Rush Limbaugh actually face a witness for a specified period that is equal soldiers who have risked their lives and tleman from Colorado (Mr. LAMBORN) is for each side and not longer than 30 minutes tell them that their beliefs don’t mat- recognized for 5 minutes. for each side at a time. The chairman and ter? (Mr. LAMBORN addressed the House. ranking minority member shall each deter- These are soldiers like Brandon His remarks will appear hereafter in mine how to allocate this time for their Friedman, a former rifle platoon leader the Extensions of Remarks.) members. in the Army’s 101st Airborne Division f (3) Views. Supplemental, minority, or addi- tional views may be filed under rule XI and who fought in Afghanistan in 2002 and The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Rep- commanded troops in Iraq. He says, previous order of the House, the gentle- resentatives, and the time allowed for filing ‘‘The escalation of the war is failing woman from California (Ms. WATERS) is of such views shall be three calendar days, and now the mission must change. The recognized for 5 minutes. beginning on the day of notice, but excluding VerDate Aug 31 2005 05:05 Sep 28, 2007 Jkt 059060 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\K27SE7.154 H27SEPT1 hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMHOUSE.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alternatives to US Hard Power
    JANUARY 2014 ALTERNATIVES TO U.S. HARD POWER: THE SAUDI RESPONSE TO U.S. TACTICS IN THE MIDDLE EAST By Brandon Friedman Brandon Friedman is a Research Fellow at the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle East and African Studies at Tel Aviv University and a Senior Fellow of FPRI. Brandon is also the Managing Editor of the Dayan Center’s journal Bustan: The Middle East Book Review. Brandon teaches in Tel Aviv University’s international Master’s in Middle East Studies program and its B.A. in Liberal Arts program. His research interests include contemporary Middle East geopolitics and strategic analysis, nuclear arms proliferation, and the political history of the Middle East during the modern period. Brandon's PhD research focused on the political relations between the rulers of the Persian Gulf littoral during the period of British military withdrawal from the region (1968 to 1971). Prior to beginning his academic career in Israel, Brandon spent seven years working for a risk advisory consulting firm in the U.S. To access Brandon’s earlier FPRI essays: http://www.fpri.org/contributors/brandon- friedman The conventional wisdom today is that Saudi Arabia will ultimately accept recent U.S. policy decisions that currently it rejects1 because it has no viable alternatives.2 While it is true that there is no equivalent to U.S. power, there are certainly alternatives to it. Historically, the Saudis have pursued regional security according to four broad principles: (1) preserving the internal security of the kingdom, (2) maintaining a regional balance of power, (3) preventing conflicts that may damage the kingdom, and (4) relying on the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • UPDATED KPCC-KVLA-KUOR Quarterly Report JAN-MAR 2013
    Date Key Synopsis Guest/Reporter Duration Quarterly Programming Report JAN-MAR 2013 KPCC / KVLA / KUOR 1/1/13 MIL With 195,000 soldiers, the Afghan army is bigger than ever. But it's also unstable. Rod Nordland 8:16 When are animals like humans? More often than you think, at least according to a new movement that links human and animal behaviors. KPCC's Stephanie O'Neill 1/1/13 HEAL reports. Stephanie O'Neill 4:08 We've all heard warning like, "Don't go swimming for an hour after you eat!" "Never run with scissors," and "Chew on your pencil and you'll get lead poisoning," from our 1/1/13 ART parents and teachers. Ken Jennings 7:04 In "The Fine Print," Pulitzer Prize-winning author David Cay Johnston details how the David Cay 1/1/13 ECON U.S. tax system distorts competition and favors corporations and the wealthy. Johnston 16:29 Eddie Izzard joins the show to talk about his series at the Steve Allen Theater, plus 1/1/13 ART he fills us in about his new show, "Force Majeure." Eddie Izzard 19:23 Our regular music critics Drew Tewksbury, Steve Hochman and Josh Kun join Alex Drew Tewksbury, Cohen and A Martinez for a special hour of music to help you get over your New Steve Hochman 1/1/13 ART Year’s Eve hangover. and Josh Kun 12:57 1/1/2013 IMM DREAM students in California get financial aid for state higher ed Guidi 1:11 1/1/2013 ECON After 53 years, Junior's Deli in Westwood has closed its doors Bergman 3:07 1/1/2013 ECON Some unemployed workers are starting off the New Year with more debt Lee 2:36 1/1/2013 ECON Lacter on 2013 predictions
    [Show full text]
  • Reimagining US Strategy in the Middle East
    REIMAGININGR I A I I G U.S.S STRATEGYT A E Y IIN THET E MMIDDLED L EEASTS Sustainable Partnerships, Strategic Investments Dalia Dassa Kaye, Linda Robinson, Jeffrey Martini, Nathan Vest, Ashley L. Rhoades C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RRA958-1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0662-0 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. 2021 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover composite design: Jessica Arana Image: wael alreweie / Getty Images Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Program on the Middle East
    PROGRAM ON THE MIDDLE EAST FOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1 PROGRAM ON THE MIDDLE EAST Despite the clamor for America’s foreign policy to pivot away from the Middle East, events in the region over the past two decades have demanded sustained American attention. The challenges at hand are many, including Iran’s regional destabilizing ambitions, the rise and fall of ISIS’s Caliphate and enduring threat of jihadi terrorism, the ostensible collapse of the old state order in the Greater Middle East, and numerous ever-entrenched conflicts between, inter alia, Sunnis and Shi‘is, Kurds and Arab, Israelis and Palestinians, and even among Syrians themselves. The Program on the Middle East at the Foreign Policy Research Institute is uniquely positioned to provide the kind of strategic thinking and thoughtful analysis required to address the perennial foreign policy challenges that this fraught region poses for American policymakers. The program brings together both established and emerging scholars from the academic, military, and policy worlds in an effort to develop a new cadre of strategic policy thinkers, versed in the languages, geography, history, culture, and politics of the region. The Middle East Program offers context, content, and policy recommendations based on this holistic view of American strategic interests in the region. Its analysis transcends headlines and catch phrases. Through its research, publications, and educational outreach, the program focuses on key themes such as authoritarianism and reform; the aftermath of the Arab
    [Show full text]
  • Darweesh V. Trump [Voluntarily Dismissed]
    Case 1:17-cv-00480-CBA Document 99 Filed 02/16/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1076 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK HAMEED KHALID DARWEESH and HAIDER SAMEER ABDULKHALEQ No. 17 Civ. 00480 ALSHAWI, on behalf of the themselves and others similarly situated, Petitioners, -against- DONALD TRUMP, President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (“DHS”); U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION (“CBP”); JOHN KELLY, Secretary of DHS; KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of CBP; and JAMES T. MADDEN, New York Field Director, CBP, Respondents. BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE VETS FOR AMERICAN IDEALS, NO ONE LEFT BEHIND, VOTE VETS, AND COMMON DEFENSE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP 600 Fifth Avenue, 10th Floor New York, New York 10020 (212) 763-5000 Case 1:17-cv-00480-CBA Document 99 Filed 02/16/17 Page 2 of 15 PageID #: 1077 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ...............................................................................1 INTEREST OF AMICI ....................................................................................................................1 THE EXECUTIVE ORDER ENDANGERS AMERICAN SOLDIERS AND THEIR LOCAL ALLIES .............................................................................................................................2 A. The U.S. Military Depends on Local Allies Who Risk Their Lives ............3 B. The Executive Order Harms U.S. Allies on the Ground ..............................6 C. The Reality on the Ground: This Executive
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 151115 (PDF Edition)
    RAO BULLETIN 15 November 2015 PDF Edition THIS BULLETIN CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES Pg Article Subject * DOD * . 05 == Individual Ready Reserve [01] --------------- (Radical Plan Unveiled) 06 == Exchange Online Shopping [04] ------------ (All Vet Proposal Status) 06 == ID Card Expiration Date [01] ------------ (Action Required if INDEF) 07 == DBIDS [02] -------- (Retiree, Family Must Register for Base Access) 07 == Commissary Elimination [04] ------ (DoD Concludes Not Necessary) 08 == Commissary Funding [23] ------------------------------------- (Catch 22) 09 == OPM Data Breach [07] ----------- ($133.3 Million Contract Awarded) 10 == DoD Fraud, Waste, and Abuse ------- (Reported 01 thru 15 Sep 2015) 11 == DoD Lawsuit ------------- (Veterans Used In Secret Experiments Sue) 13 == Military Conduct - (GAO Releases Ethics & Professionalism Report) 13 == RP~China Dispute [13] ------------- (Carter’s Clear Line in The Sand) 14 == AAFES Mission Fulfillment -------------------------- (Status Sep 2015) 15 == GTMO Prison [01] -------- (Obama 2008 Campaign Closure Promise) 16 == POW/MIA [66] ---------------- (7 Oklahoma Crewmembers Identified) 16 == POW/MIA Recoveries ----------------- (Reported 150901 thru 150914) * VA * . 24 == VA Undersecretary for Benefits --------- (Resigns amid New Scandal) 25 == VA Bonuses [28] -------------- ($142M Paid in 2014 despite Scandals) 27 == Planning for Getting Older ------------------------- (It is Never to Early) 28 == Agent Orange Act Extension [01] ------------------ (Provision Expires) 30 == GI Bill [195]
    [Show full text]
  • America's Veterans
    SEPTEMBER 2013 America’s Veterans VOICES A Sound Investment FROM THE FIELD By William B. Caldwell, IV and Crispin J. Burke Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the Kansas City chapter of Business Executives in National Security, without whom there would not have been the inspiration for this article. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not represent the Department of Defense. Cover Image iStockPhoto SEPTEMBER 2013 America’s Veterans A Sound Investment By William B. Caldwell, IV and Crispin J. Burke About the Authors William B. Caldwell, IV has served in a variety of command and staff positions during his 37 years of military service. He is preparing to retire and assume duties as the President of Georgia Military College. Crispin J. Burke has served as a U.S. Army Aviator for the past ten years. He is a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom. VOICES FROM THE FIELD “All our veterans deserve the opportunity to contribute to society once out of uniform.” general martin e. dempsey, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff I. INTRODUCTION II. VETERANS: UNIQUELY QUALIFIED EMPLOYEES America is proud of its armed forces. The U.S. America’s veterans are exceptional. Service mem- military has consistently garnered the highest bers are subjected to a rigorous vetting process confidence rates of any government institution for before they enlist or commission, highlighting their competitive advantage relative to their peers. 1 decades, and understandably so. The United States Fewer than one in four Americans can even meet asks much of its men and women in uniform, and the minimum standards to join the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Army Sergeant Never Talked About Horrors Of
    Volume - 2 Edition 13 Week Ending April 5, 2008 IN THIS ISSUE Red Army sergeant never · Red Army sergeant never talked about horrors of war talked about horrors of war · Visions of family for troops · The last cavalry charge · Killing Fields journalist Dith Pran dies · Vimy was a turning point; Veterans gather to remember key First World War battle · Canada's soldiers of misfortune · Veterans recall days at war, talk about Afghanistan mission · New Members Wanted for Branch 50's Colour Party · Another Executive Change · The Changing Face Of Branch 50's Executive. · TINA MARIE EMSLIE · U.K.: Veterans of all ages mark RAF's 90th Birthday. · Wounded vets get short shrift · Via Rail deal has fatal flaw, veteran says · Yes, It Was a Good War · Switzerland: Bumper Spaghetti Crop at risk of Late Frosts · U.S. veterans of Afghanistan Mission express disbelief at President George He took part in the Battle of Bush's representations about War Stalingrad and immigrated to Canada · Comments On The Flag Vote in 1992 after the collapse of the Soviet · Tories set to lose Peace Tower flag-lowering vote Union. · Lowered flag for all troop deaths opposed · Collingwood Locals Helping Wounded Warriors Peter Gitelman was a Red Army · The Red Baron flies back into role of the hero in Germany Master Sergeant who took part in the · Canada's flag should fly high Battle of Stalingrad during the Second · ALL BRANCH - A TOUTES LES FILIALES (08-007) - Half-Masting the Flag World War and who was decorated for on the Peace Tower bravery following the bloody Russian · Osteoporosis often called the silent thief offensive against the Germans that · Legion boasts many VIPs around the world claimed more than one million lives · War ID at heart of dying wish during the winter of 1942-43.
    [Show full text]
  • Paradox and Perception
    Between the Regional and the Global US troops in the Middle East. Photo: Travis Muller (CC.BY 2.0) US Engagement and Disengagement in the Middle East: Paradox and Perception Brandon Friedman This article examines how key actors in the Middle East came to view the United States as disengaging from the Middle East in the decade following the Arab Spring uprisings. This perception was evident not only in the statements from key officials across the region, but more importantly, in the actions of principal regional actors, particularly from 2015 to 2020. The article argues that it is a paradox that the United States is perceived as withdrawing from the region given the scope of the US military presence and the importance of the US military operations in the region over the last decade, particularly in Iraq and Syria. At the heart of this paradox are US statements implying that diplomacy and force are mutually exclusive alternatives for US policy. The challenge facing the Biden administration will be convincing the region that “aggressive diplomacy” is a complement and not a substitute for a credible military deterrent. Keywords: Arab Spring, United States, Syria, Iraq, disengagement, diplomacy Brandon Friedman | US Engagement and Disengagement in the Middle East: Paradox and Perception 137 Introduction from the Middle East, is the great paradox of Since 2011, there has been an ongoing the past decade in the region. debate whether the US was withdrawing or The growing perception of a declining disengaging from the Middle East, despite the American presence in the Middle East has fact that former Obama officials, like Derek paralleled a recurring theme in the recent Chollet (2017), have referred to the notion of literature on international politics that the American withdrawal from Middle East as a structure of the international system has “myth” (Chollet, Sullivan, Simes, & Long, 2017, changed over the last decade (2011-2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents From the Editors 3 From the President 3 From the Executive Director 4 The Iraq & Iran Issue Iran and Iraq: Demography beyond the Jewish Past 6 Sergio DellaPergola AJS, Ahmadinejad, and Me 8 Richard Kalmin Baghdad in the West: Migration and the Making of Medieval Jewish Traditions 11 Marina Rustow Jews of Iran and Rabbinical Literature: Preliminary Notes 14 Daniel Tsadik Iraqi Arab-Jewish Identities: First Body Singular 18 Orit Bashkin A Republic of Letters without a Republic? 24 Lital Levy A Fruit That Asks Questions: Michael Rakowitz’s Shipment of Iraqi Dates 28 Jenny Gheith On Becoming Persian: Illuminating the Iranian-Jewish Community 30 Photographs by Shelley Gazin, with commentary by Nasrin Rahimieh JAPS: Jewish American Persian Women and Their Hybrid Identity in America 34 Saba Tova Soomekh Engagement, Diplomacy, and Iran’s Nuclear Program 42 Brandon Friedman Online Resources for Talmud Research, Study, and Teaching 46 Heidi Lerner The Latest Limmud UK 2009 52 Caryn Aviv A Serious Man 53 Jason Kalman The Questionnaire What development in Jewish studies over the last twenty years has most excited you? 55 AJS Perspectives: The Magazine of the President Please direct correspondence to: Association for Jewish Studies Marsha Rozenblit Association for Jewish Studies University of Maryland Center for Jewish History Editors 15 West 16th Street Matti Bunzl Vice President/Publications New York, NY 10011 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Jeffrey Shandler Rachel Havrelock Rutgers University Voice: (917) 606-8249 University of Illinois at Chicago Fax: (917) 606-8222 Vice President/Program E-Mail: [email protected] Derek Penslar Web Site: www.ajsnet.org Editorial Board Allan Arkush University of Toronto Binghamton University AJS Perspectives is published bi-annually Vice President/Membership by the Association for Jewish Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • 201204.Friedman.Iran-Israel-Calculus
    Foreign Policy Research Institute E-Notes A Catalyst for Ideas Distributed via Email and Posted at www.fpri.org April 2012 IRAN IN ISRAEL’S STRATEGIC CALCULUS By Brandon Friedman Brandon Friedman is a Research Fellow at the Center for Iranian Studies at Tel Aviv University. This article is based on his February 27, 2012 talk at FPRI on “Muscle-Flexing, Quiet Diplomacy, and Iran's Nuclear Program,” The audiocast of this event can be accessed here: http://www.fpri.org/multimedia/2012/20120227.friedman.iran.html “Will Israel Attack Iran?” was the provocative headline of respected Israeli journalist Ronen Bergman’s January story published in The New York Times Magazine. Bergman claimed that “yes,” Israel would attack Iran in 2012.1 A few days later, Israeli scholar Barry Rubin published a long article of his own which argued that “no,” Israel would not strike Iran.2 So, which is it? Yes or no? The less satisfactory answer, the less media-worthy answer, but perhaps the more accurate and honest answer is that “it depends.” And therefore, the better question to ask, it seems to me, is under what set of circumstances is the current Israeli leadership more or less likely to feel it must take independent military action? Before I address that question, however, I would like to briefly explain the three assumptions that underlie my interpretation of this issue. First, I believe Iran’s ultimate goal is a nuclear weapons capability. Second, I believe Israel's security cabinet has not yet made any decision about a military strike on Iran but that the current government views a nuclear-armed Iran as an unacceptable outcome.
    [Show full text]
  • The Muslim Brotherhood and the Emerging 'Shia Crescent'
    The Muslim Brotherhood and the Emerging ‘Shia Crescent’ by Samuel Helfont Samuel Helfont is the author of Yusuf al-Qaradawi, Islam, and Modernity, a forthcoming monograph from the Moshe Dayan Center. A veteran of U.S. Naval Intelligence and the Iraq War, he earned his MA in Middle Eastern History from Tel Aviv University. Abstract: To form a more prudent foreign policy toward the Muslim Brother- hood, we must understand it not only as a domestic actor, but also as a major regional player. In fact, the Brotherhood has a complex relationship with Iran and the Shias, which blurs the lines of the so-called Shia Crescent. This article addresses the Muslim Brotherhood’s foreign/regional policy by analyzing its attitude toward the Shias and Iran, thus placing it within the context of the emerging regional order. Addressing the complex relationship between the Muslim Brotherhood and the Shias/Iran will help to clarify the regional fallout were the Brotherhood to gain control of a major Sunni Arab state. This is a vital issue for policy makers who are considering the U.S. position vis-a`-vis the Brotherhood. Introduction new order led by Iran, sometimes referred to as the ‘‘Shia Crescent,’’ is emerging in the Middle East. This new order pits Sunni Wahhabists A and Arab nationalists, against Iran and Arab Shias. Much has been written about the emergence of this new order. Scholars such as Vali Nasr and Juan Cole have gone into great depth describing it and conferences at the Council on Foreign Relations and the Middle East Policy Council, among others, have attempted to address the implications for U.S.
    [Show full text]