Bulletin 151115 (PDF Edition)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Alternatives to US Hard Power
JANUARY 2014 ALTERNATIVES TO U.S. HARD POWER: THE SAUDI RESPONSE TO U.S. TACTICS IN THE MIDDLE EAST By Brandon Friedman Brandon Friedman is a Research Fellow at the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle East and African Studies at Tel Aviv University and a Senior Fellow of FPRI. Brandon is also the Managing Editor of the Dayan Center’s journal Bustan: The Middle East Book Review. Brandon teaches in Tel Aviv University’s international Master’s in Middle East Studies program and its B.A. in Liberal Arts program. His research interests include contemporary Middle East geopolitics and strategic analysis, nuclear arms proliferation, and the political history of the Middle East during the modern period. Brandon's PhD research focused on the political relations between the rulers of the Persian Gulf littoral during the period of British military withdrawal from the region (1968 to 1971). Prior to beginning his academic career in Israel, Brandon spent seven years working for a risk advisory consulting firm in the U.S. To access Brandon’s earlier FPRI essays: http://www.fpri.org/contributors/brandon- friedman The conventional wisdom today is that Saudi Arabia will ultimately accept recent U.S. policy decisions that currently it rejects1 because it has no viable alternatives.2 While it is true that there is no equivalent to U.S. power, there are certainly alternatives to it. Historically, the Saudis have pursued regional security according to four broad principles: (1) preserving the internal security of the kingdom, (2) maintaining a regional balance of power, (3) preventing conflicts that may damage the kingdom, and (4) relying on the U.S. -
UPDATED KPCC-KVLA-KUOR Quarterly Report JAN-MAR 2013
Date Key Synopsis Guest/Reporter Duration Quarterly Programming Report JAN-MAR 2013 KPCC / KVLA / KUOR 1/1/13 MIL With 195,000 soldiers, the Afghan army is bigger than ever. But it's also unstable. Rod Nordland 8:16 When are animals like humans? More often than you think, at least according to a new movement that links human and animal behaviors. KPCC's Stephanie O'Neill 1/1/13 HEAL reports. Stephanie O'Neill 4:08 We've all heard warning like, "Don't go swimming for an hour after you eat!" "Never run with scissors," and "Chew on your pencil and you'll get lead poisoning," from our 1/1/13 ART parents and teachers. Ken Jennings 7:04 In "The Fine Print," Pulitzer Prize-winning author David Cay Johnston details how the David Cay 1/1/13 ECON U.S. tax system distorts competition and favors corporations and the wealthy. Johnston 16:29 Eddie Izzard joins the show to talk about his series at the Steve Allen Theater, plus 1/1/13 ART he fills us in about his new show, "Force Majeure." Eddie Izzard 19:23 Our regular music critics Drew Tewksbury, Steve Hochman and Josh Kun join Alex Drew Tewksbury, Cohen and A Martinez for a special hour of music to help you get over your New Steve Hochman 1/1/13 ART Year’s Eve hangover. and Josh Kun 12:57 1/1/2013 IMM DREAM students in California get financial aid for state higher ed Guidi 1:11 1/1/2013 ECON After 53 years, Junior's Deli in Westwood has closed its doors Bergman 3:07 1/1/2013 ECON Some unemployed workers are starting off the New Year with more debt Lee 2:36 1/1/2013 ECON Lacter on 2013 predictions -
Reimagining US Strategy in the Middle East
REIMAGININGR I A I I G U.S.S STRATEGYT A E Y IIN THET E MMIDDLED L EEASTS Sustainable Partnerships, Strategic Investments Dalia Dassa Kaye, Linda Robinson, Jeffrey Martini, Nathan Vest, Ashley L. Rhoades C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RRA958-1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0662-0 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. 2021 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover composite design: Jessica Arana Image: wael alreweie / Getty Images Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface U.S. -
Program on the Middle East
PROGRAM ON THE MIDDLE EAST FOREIGN POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1 PROGRAM ON THE MIDDLE EAST Despite the clamor for America’s foreign policy to pivot away from the Middle East, events in the region over the past two decades have demanded sustained American attention. The challenges at hand are many, including Iran’s regional destabilizing ambitions, the rise and fall of ISIS’s Caliphate and enduring threat of jihadi terrorism, the ostensible collapse of the old state order in the Greater Middle East, and numerous ever-entrenched conflicts between, inter alia, Sunnis and Shi‘is, Kurds and Arab, Israelis and Palestinians, and even among Syrians themselves. The Program on the Middle East at the Foreign Policy Research Institute is uniquely positioned to provide the kind of strategic thinking and thoughtful analysis required to address the perennial foreign policy challenges that this fraught region poses for American policymakers. The program brings together both established and emerging scholars from the academic, military, and policy worlds in an effort to develop a new cadre of strategic policy thinkers, versed in the languages, geography, history, culture, and politics of the region. The Middle East Program offers context, content, and policy recommendations based on this holistic view of American strategic interests in the region. Its analysis transcends headlines and catch phrases. Through its research, publications, and educational outreach, the program focuses on key themes such as authoritarianism and reform; the aftermath of the Arab -
![Darweesh V. Trump [Voluntarily Dismissed]](https://docslib.b-cdn.net/cover/6704/darweesh-v-trump-voluntarily-dismissed-816704.webp)
Darweesh V. Trump [Voluntarily Dismissed]
Case 1:17-cv-00480-CBA Document 99 Filed 02/16/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1076 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK HAMEED KHALID DARWEESH and HAIDER SAMEER ABDULKHALEQ No. 17 Civ. 00480 ALSHAWI, on behalf of the themselves and others similarly situated, Petitioners, -against- DONALD TRUMP, President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (“DHS”); U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION (“CBP”); JOHN KELLY, Secretary of DHS; KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Acting Commissioner of CBP; and JAMES T. MADDEN, New York Field Director, CBP, Respondents. BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE VETS FOR AMERICAN IDEALS, NO ONE LEFT BEHIND, VOTE VETS, AND COMMON DEFENSE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP 600 Fifth Avenue, 10th Floor New York, New York 10020 (212) 763-5000 Case 1:17-cv-00480-CBA Document 99 Filed 02/16/17 Page 2 of 15 PageID #: 1077 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ...............................................................................1 INTEREST OF AMICI ....................................................................................................................1 THE EXECUTIVE ORDER ENDANGERS AMERICAN SOLDIERS AND THEIR LOCAL ALLIES .............................................................................................................................2 A. The U.S. Military Depends on Local Allies Who Risk Their Lives ............3 B. The Executive Order Harms U.S. Allies on the Ground ..............................6 C. The Reality on the Ground: This Executive -
Prisoners of War 1915 – 1945
“In the Bag”: Prisoners of War 1915 – 1945 “IN THE BAG”: PRISONERS OF WAR 1915 - 1945 THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONFERENCE HELD AT THE POMPEY ELLIOT MEMORIAL HALL, CAMBERWELL RSL BY MILITARY HISTORY AND HERITAGE, VICTORIA. 12 NOVEMBER 2016 Proudly supported by: “In the Bag”: Prisoners of War 1915 – 1945 One of ‘The Fifty’- Understanding the human cost of The Great Escape through the relics of Squadron Leader James Catanach DFC Neil Sharkey A lot of people know about the Great Escape and their most important source of information is this document :- And the detail of the escape they remember most, is this one. “In the Bag”: Prisoners of War 1915 – 1945 I really shouldn’t make light of one of the Second World War’s most fascinating and tragic episodes and only do so to make the point that the film was made as entertainment. Many aspects of the story were altered for commercial reasons. None of the actual escapees were American, for instance, and none of the escape attempts involved stolen motorcycles, or hijacked Messerschmitts. Most characters in the film were amalgams of many men rather than single individuals and the ‘The Fifty’ to who the film is dedicated were not machine- gunned in one place at the same time, as depicted in the film, but shot in small groups, in different locales, over many days. Much of what the film does depict, however, is correct, the way sought-after items—tools, identity papers, supplies—were fabricated or otherwise obtained, as well as, the inventive technologies employed in the planning of the escape and the construction of the tunnel. -
NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946
INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL (NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946 Page numbers in braces refer to IMT, judgment of 1 October 1946, in The Trial of German Major War Criminals. Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal sitting at Nuremberg, Germany , Part 22 (22nd August ,1946 to 1st October, 1946) 1 {iii} THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL IN SESSOIN AT NUREMBERG, GERMANY Before: THE RT. HON. SIR GEOFFREY LAWRENCE (member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) President THE HON. SIR WILLIAM NORMAN BIRKETT (alternate member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) MR. FRANCIS BIDDLE (member for the United States of America) JUDGE JOHN J. PARKER (alternate member for the United States of America) M. LE PROFESSEUR DONNEDIEU DE VABRES (member for the French Republic) M. LE CONSEILER FLACO (alternate member for the French Republic) MAJOR-GENERAL I. T. NIKITCHENKO (member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) LT.-COLONEL A. F. VOLCHKOV (alternate member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) {iv} THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, AND THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS Against: Hermann Wilhelm Göring, Rudolf Hess, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Robert Ley, Wilhelm Keitel, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Alfred Rosenberg, Hans Frank, Wilhelm Frick, Julius Streicher, Walter Funk, Hjalmar Schacht, Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach, Karl Dönitz, Erich Raeder, Baldur von Schirach, Fritz Sauckel, Alfred Jodl, Martin -
America's Veterans
SEPTEMBER 2013 America’s Veterans VOICES A Sound Investment FROM THE FIELD By William B. Caldwell, IV and Crispin J. Burke Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the Kansas City chapter of Business Executives in National Security, without whom there would not have been the inspiration for this article. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not represent the Department of Defense. Cover Image iStockPhoto SEPTEMBER 2013 America’s Veterans A Sound Investment By William B. Caldwell, IV and Crispin J. Burke About the Authors William B. Caldwell, IV has served in a variety of command and staff positions during his 37 years of military service. He is preparing to retire and assume duties as the President of Georgia Military College. Crispin J. Burke has served as a U.S. Army Aviator for the past ten years. He is a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom. VOICES FROM THE FIELD “All our veterans deserve the opportunity to contribute to society once out of uniform.” general martin e. dempsey, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff I. INTRODUCTION II. VETERANS: UNIQUELY QUALIFIED EMPLOYEES America is proud of its armed forces. The U.S. America’s veterans are exceptional. Service mem- military has consistently garnered the highest bers are subjected to a rigorous vetting process confidence rates of any government institution for before they enlist or commission, highlighting their competitive advantage relative to their peers. 1 decades, and understandably so. The United States Fewer than one in four Americans can even meet asks much of its men and women in uniform, and the minimum standards to join the U.S. -
Red Army Sergeant Never Talked About Horrors Of
Volume - 2 Edition 13 Week Ending April 5, 2008 IN THIS ISSUE Red Army sergeant never · Red Army sergeant never talked about horrors of war talked about horrors of war · Visions of family for troops · The last cavalry charge · Killing Fields journalist Dith Pran dies · Vimy was a turning point; Veterans gather to remember key First World War battle · Canada's soldiers of misfortune · Veterans recall days at war, talk about Afghanistan mission · New Members Wanted for Branch 50's Colour Party · Another Executive Change · The Changing Face Of Branch 50's Executive. · TINA MARIE EMSLIE · U.K.: Veterans of all ages mark RAF's 90th Birthday. · Wounded vets get short shrift · Via Rail deal has fatal flaw, veteran says · Yes, It Was a Good War · Switzerland: Bumper Spaghetti Crop at risk of Late Frosts · U.S. veterans of Afghanistan Mission express disbelief at President George He took part in the Battle of Bush's representations about War Stalingrad and immigrated to Canada · Comments On The Flag Vote in 1992 after the collapse of the Soviet · Tories set to lose Peace Tower flag-lowering vote Union. · Lowered flag for all troop deaths opposed · Collingwood Locals Helping Wounded Warriors Peter Gitelman was a Red Army · The Red Baron flies back into role of the hero in Germany Master Sergeant who took part in the · Canada's flag should fly high Battle of Stalingrad during the Second · ALL BRANCH - A TOUTES LES FILIALES (08-007) - Half-Masting the Flag World War and who was decorated for on the Peace Tower bravery following the bloody Russian · Osteoporosis often called the silent thief offensive against the Germans that · Legion boasts many VIPs around the world claimed more than one million lives · War ID at heart of dying wish during the winter of 1942-43. -
Paradox and Perception
Between the Regional and the Global US troops in the Middle East. Photo: Travis Muller (CC.BY 2.0) US Engagement and Disengagement in the Middle East: Paradox and Perception Brandon Friedman This article examines how key actors in the Middle East came to view the United States as disengaging from the Middle East in the decade following the Arab Spring uprisings. This perception was evident not only in the statements from key officials across the region, but more importantly, in the actions of principal regional actors, particularly from 2015 to 2020. The article argues that it is a paradox that the United States is perceived as withdrawing from the region given the scope of the US military presence and the importance of the US military operations in the region over the last decade, particularly in Iraq and Syria. At the heart of this paradox are US statements implying that diplomacy and force are mutually exclusive alternatives for US policy. The challenge facing the Biden administration will be convincing the region that “aggressive diplomacy” is a complement and not a substitute for a credible military deterrent. Keywords: Arab Spring, United States, Syria, Iraq, disengagement, diplomacy Brandon Friedman | US Engagement and Disengagement in the Middle East: Paradox and Perception 137 Introduction from the Middle East, is the great paradox of Since 2011, there has been an ongoing the past decade in the region. debate whether the US was withdrawing or The growing perception of a declining disengaging from the Middle East, despite the American presence in the Middle East has fact that former Obama officials, like Derek paralleled a recurring theme in the recent Chollet (2017), have referred to the notion of literature on international politics that the American withdrawal from Middle East as a structure of the international system has “myth” (Chollet, Sullivan, Simes, & Long, 2017, changed over the last decade (2011-2019). -
Table of Contents
Table of Contents From the Editors 3 From the President 3 From the Executive Director 4 The Iraq & Iran Issue Iran and Iraq: Demography beyond the Jewish Past 6 Sergio DellaPergola AJS, Ahmadinejad, and Me 8 Richard Kalmin Baghdad in the West: Migration and the Making of Medieval Jewish Traditions 11 Marina Rustow Jews of Iran and Rabbinical Literature: Preliminary Notes 14 Daniel Tsadik Iraqi Arab-Jewish Identities: First Body Singular 18 Orit Bashkin A Republic of Letters without a Republic? 24 Lital Levy A Fruit That Asks Questions: Michael Rakowitz’s Shipment of Iraqi Dates 28 Jenny Gheith On Becoming Persian: Illuminating the Iranian-Jewish Community 30 Photographs by Shelley Gazin, with commentary by Nasrin Rahimieh JAPS: Jewish American Persian Women and Their Hybrid Identity in America 34 Saba Tova Soomekh Engagement, Diplomacy, and Iran’s Nuclear Program 42 Brandon Friedman Online Resources for Talmud Research, Study, and Teaching 46 Heidi Lerner The Latest Limmud UK 2009 52 Caryn Aviv A Serious Man 53 Jason Kalman The Questionnaire What development in Jewish studies over the last twenty years has most excited you? 55 AJS Perspectives: The Magazine of the President Please direct correspondence to: Association for Jewish Studies Marsha Rozenblit Association for Jewish Studies University of Maryland Center for Jewish History Editors 15 West 16th Street Matti Bunzl Vice President/Publications New York, NY 10011 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Jeffrey Shandler Rachel Havrelock Rutgers University Voice: (917) 606-8249 University of Illinois at Chicago Fax: (917) 606-8222 Vice President/Program E-Mail: [email protected] Derek Penslar Web Site: www.ajsnet.org Editorial Board Allan Arkush University of Toronto Binghamton University AJS Perspectives is published bi-annually Vice President/Membership by the Association for Jewish Studies. -
201204.Friedman.Iran-Israel-Calculus
Foreign Policy Research Institute E-Notes A Catalyst for Ideas Distributed via Email and Posted at www.fpri.org April 2012 IRAN IN ISRAEL’S STRATEGIC CALCULUS By Brandon Friedman Brandon Friedman is a Research Fellow at the Center for Iranian Studies at Tel Aviv University. This article is based on his February 27, 2012 talk at FPRI on “Muscle-Flexing, Quiet Diplomacy, and Iran's Nuclear Program,” The audiocast of this event can be accessed here: http://www.fpri.org/multimedia/2012/20120227.friedman.iran.html “Will Israel Attack Iran?” was the provocative headline of respected Israeli journalist Ronen Bergman’s January story published in The New York Times Magazine. Bergman claimed that “yes,” Israel would attack Iran in 2012.1 A few days later, Israeli scholar Barry Rubin published a long article of his own which argued that “no,” Israel would not strike Iran.2 So, which is it? Yes or no? The less satisfactory answer, the less media-worthy answer, but perhaps the more accurate and honest answer is that “it depends.” And therefore, the better question to ask, it seems to me, is under what set of circumstances is the current Israeli leadership more or less likely to feel it must take independent military action? Before I address that question, however, I would like to briefly explain the three assumptions that underlie my interpretation of this issue. First, I believe Iran’s ultimate goal is a nuclear weapons capability. Second, I believe Israel's security cabinet has not yet made any decision about a military strike on Iran but that the current government views a nuclear-armed Iran as an unacceptable outcome.