DOCSLIB.ORG

The Role of UN Peacekeeping in China's Expanding Strategic Interests

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Role of UN Peacekeeping in China's Expanding Strategic Interests UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org SPECIAL REPORT 2301 Constitution Ave., NW • Washington, DC 20037 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPORT Marc Lanteigne This Special Report assesses China’s evolving participation in international peacekeeping missions in the context of its rise as a major economic and military power. The report is based on data collection on Chinese foreign and security policy issues as well as fieldwork in China and Norway. Supported by the Asia The Role of UN Center at the United States Institute of Peace, the report is part of USIP’s broader effort to understand China’s engagement in the peace processes and internal conflicts of other nations. Peacekeeping in ABOUT THE AUTHOR Marc Lanteigne is a senior lecturer in security studies in the China’s Expanding Centre for Defence and Security Studies at Massey University in New Zealand. Previously, he was a senior research fellow at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, where he specialized in Chinese and Northeast Asian politics and foreign Strategic Interests policy, as well as Asia-Arctic relations, international political economy, and institution building. He has written on issues related to China’s regional and international relations as well as Summary economic security, the politics of trade, and energy issues. • Despite its growing status in the international system, including in the military sphere, China continues to be a strong supporter of United Nations peacekeeping operations (UNPKO), a stance commonly considered to be more the purview of medium powers. China is also a major contributor of peacekeeping personnel and support. • Beijing’s current UN peacekeeping policies have helped China expand its diplomacy through- out the developing world, a notable action given the ongoing evolution of its Belt and Road trade initiatives. • In spite of recent Chinese peacekeeper casualties, the country continues preparations— © 2018 by the United States Institute of Peace. including new training programs and units—to permit its peacekeeping personnel to more All rights reserved. effectively operate in active combat zones such as Mali and South Sudan. SPECIAL REPORT 430 SEPTEMBER 2018 • China is now in a position to become more active in UNPKO reforms and provide greater input into mission parameters, given its greater contribution to the UN budget and expanded CONTENTS international commitments. Introduction 2 • China’s support for UN peacekeeping operations has become more visibly integrated into its China’s Positive Stance on UN Peacekeeping 2 military reform policies. However, Beijing must engage in a policy dialogue about how modern Emerging Challenges 4 peacekeeping can be reconciled with traditional Chinese views on state sovereignty, impartial- Conclusion 5 ity, and being a “responsible great power.” ABOUT THE INSTITUTE Introduction The United States Institute of Peace is an independent, nonpartisan institution established and funded by Congress. Although China is now almost universally acknowledged as a great power and a potential Its goals are to help prevent and resolve violent conflicts, global power, Beijing continues to approach United Nations peacekeeping operations promote postconflict peacebuilding, and increase conflict (UNPKO) with policies more akin to those of a medium power. For much of the Cold War management tools, capacity, and intellectual capital period, China was highly skeptical of the concept of United Nations peacekeeping, but the worldwide. The Institute does this by empowering others past thirty years have seen a dramatic reversal of this view and a greater acceptance of with knowledge, skills, and resources, as well as by its direct participation in peacekeeping operations as a major component of Beijing’s still-evolving involvement in conflict zones around the globe. “military operations other than war” (MOOTW) policies. Among the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, China con- BOARD OF DIRECTORS tinues to be the largest contributor of personnel for UN peacekeeping operations (see table Stephen J. Hadley (Chair), Principal, RiceHadleyGates, LLC, 1). As of July 31, 2018, 2,519 Chinese UN personnel were stationed abroad, nearly 3 percent Washington, DC • George E. Moose (Vice Chair), Adjunct Professor of Practice, The George Washington University, Wash- of the 91,249 UN peacekeepers deployed around the world. Since the early 1990s, China has ington, DC • Judy Ansley, Former Assistant to the President and deployed approximately 36,000 personnel for UN missions.1 Beijing also agreed to raise its Deputy National Security Advisor under George W. Bush, Wash- annual contribution to the UNPKO budget from 3.9 percent in 2012 to 10.3 percent between ington, DC • Eric Edelman, Hertog Distinguished Practitioner 2016 and 2018, thus making China the second-largest financial contributor after the United in Residence, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International States.2 At the end of 2016, it was even reported that Beijing was seeking the leadership of the Studies, Washington, DC • Joseph Eldridge, University Chaplain UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations, a position that to date has been dominated by and Senior Adjunct Professorial Lecturer, School of International Service, American University, Washington, DC • Kerry Kennedy, France. Even though China has demonstrated a deepening commitment to and greater visibil- President, Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human ity in UNPKO, there has yet to be a Chinese national as head of a major peacekeeping mission.3 Rights, Washington, DC • Ikram U. Khan, President, Quality Care China’s commitment to UN peacekeeping was further underscored in September 2015, Consultants, LLC, Las Vegas, NV • Stephen D. Krasner, Graham when President Xi Jinping announced in a speech to the UN General Assembly that China H. Stuart Professor of International Relations at Stanford would be creating a standby UN contingent of 8,000 Chinese personnel, with some forces University, Palo Alto, CA • John A. Lancaster, Former Executive being seconded to a rapid-response force. That year, China also agreed to join the UN’s Director, International Council on Independent Living, Potsdam, NY • Jeremy A. Rabkin, Professor of Law, George Mason Peacekeeping Capability Readiness System, and pledged a ten-year, $1 billion UN Peace and University, Fairfax, VA • J. Robinson West, Chairman, PFC Development Trust Fund for joint China-UN peace initiatives.4 Energy, Washington, DC • Nancy Zirkin, Executive Vice At present, the main question is will Beijing be able to continue this level of engagement President, Leadership Conference on Civil and with UN peacekeeping as China evolves as a great power? Unlike medium powers such as Human Rights, Washington, DC Australia, Canada, and South Korea—which tend to be perceived as “joiner” states and non- partisan actors—great powers often are less likely to remain neutral, or to be seen as such, MEMBERS EX OFFICIO in policies addressing international or civil conflicts.5 As a result, great powers such as the Mike Pompeo, Secretary of State • James Mattis, Secretary of United States and Russia have been less inclined to participate directly in UN peacekeeping Defense • Frederick J. Roegge, Vice Admiral, US Navy; operations beyond a support role, although both countries have considerably more forces President, National Defense University • Nancy Lindborg, deployed as part of non-UN missions. While the US government called for drastic cuts to its President, United States Institute of Peace (nonvoting) contributions to the UN peacekeeping budget in April 2017, it has since softened that stance while still vowing to hold to nothing more than a 25 percent share of the overall budget.6 Washington’s potential retreat from UNPKO may therefore open the door to further Chinese influence in peacekeeping development. China’s Positive Stance on UN Peacekeeping Ever since China began to reform the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) in late 2015, UN peace- keeping has been an integral part of the restructuring processes. China will likely continue to invest in peacekeeping for four main reasons. The views expressed in this report do not necessarily First, China’s “rise” has been both strategic and economic in nature and, compared with reflect the views of the United States Institute of Peace, that of previous great powers, has taken place very swiftly. This rapid rise has created which does not advocate specific policy positions. concerns, especially in the United States, that despite China’s earlier “peaceful develop- To request permission to photocopy or reprint materials, ment” foreign policies, the Xi government is becoming more confident in challenging the email: [email protected]. strategic status quo. This concern has increased as China’s power-projection capabilities have 2 USIP.ORG • SPECIAL REPORT 430 Table 1. Contributions to UN Peacekeeping Operations by the Five Permanent Members of the UN Security Council (as of July 31, 2018) UN Military Staff Country Police Experts on Officers Troops Total Mission China 18 32 51 2,418 2,519 France 34 2 49 650 735 United Kingdom 0 4 27 674 705 Russia 29 37 5 0 71 United States 93410 53 Source: United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations matured. China’s shift has been especially noticeable in the territorial disputes in the East and the South China Seas, as well as in Beijing’s growing interest in the Indian Ocean region. By maintaining support for multilateral security initiatives,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Afghanistan Anam Ahmed | Elizabethtown High School
    Afghanistan Anam Ahmed | Elizabethtown High School Head of State: Ashraf Ghani GDP: 664.76 USD per capita Population: 33,895,000 UN Ambassador: Mahmoud Saikal Joined UN: 1946 Current Member of UNSC: No Past UNSC Membership: No Issue 1: Immigration, Refugees, and Asylum Seekers Afghanistan is the highest refugee producing country with roughly six million refugees. Regarding immigration and refugees, Afghanistan believes that all neighboring countries to those with the highest refugee count, such as Syria and Afghanistan, need to have an open door policy to these individuals. The refugees would need to be approved by the government in order to enter and live in the country; however, if denied access they must not be forced back. Refugee camps with adequate food, water, medical help, and shelter must be provided by the UN and its members in order to reduce refugee suffering. Although many of the countries around the world will disagree with this plan, they fail to realize the severity of this issue. In Afghanistan millions of individuals are left to fend for themselves in a foreign land with literally nothing but the clothes on their back. As a country with over six million refugees, we are able understand the necessity for a change in the current situation. The UN distinguishes between asylum seekers and refugees, however those who are not accepted by others need not be excluded from having a proper life. With the dramatic increase of refugees and immigrants around the world resulting from the dramatic increase of wars of crises, the UN must acknowledge and call all people fleeing from their country refugees and not distinguish between the two.
    [Show full text]
  • The Navy's Changing Force Paradigm
    Naval War College Review Volume 62 Article 4 Number 2 Spring 2009 The aN vy’s Changing Force Paradigm Robert C. Rubel Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Rubel, Robert C. (2009) "The aN vy’s Changing Force Paradigm," Naval War College Review: Vol. 62 : No. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol62/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rubel: The Navy’s Changing Force Paradigm Professor Rubel is Dean of Naval Warfare Studies at the Naval War College. Before retiring from the U.S. Navy in the grade of captain, he was an aviator, participat- ing in operations connected with the 1973 Yom Kippur War, the 1980 Iranian hostage crisis, and DESERT SHIELD. He commanded Strike Fighter Squad- ron 131 and served as the inspector general of U.S. Southern Command. He attended the Spanish Naval War College and the U.S. Naval War College, where he served on the faculty and as chairman of the War Gam- ing Department, in the Center for Naval Warfare Stud- ies, before his present appointment. He has a BS degree from the University of Illinois, an MS in management from Salve Regina University in Newport, Rhode Is- land, and an MA in national security and strategic studies from the Naval War College (1986).
    [Show full text]
  • S/PV.7361 Security Council Provisional Asdf Seventieth Year 7361St Meeting Monday, 19 January 2015, 9.30 A.M
    United Nations S/PV.7361 Security Council Provisional asdf Seventieth year 7361st meeting Monday, 19 January 2015, 9.30 a.m. New York President: Ms. Bachelet Jeria/Mr. Barros Melet/Mr. Olguín Cigarroa . .. (Chile) Members: Angola .. Mr. Augusto Chad .......................................... Mr. Cherif China . ......................................... Mr. Liu Jieyi France ......................................... Mr. Lamek Jordan ......................................... Mr. Hmoud Lithuania . ...................................... Ms. Murmokaitė Malaysia ....................................... Mr. Haniff New Zealand .................................... Mr. McLay Nigeria . ........................................ Mr. Laro Russian Federation ............................... Mr. Churkin Spain .......................................... Mr. Ybañez United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ... Sir Mark Lyall Grant United States of America . .......................... Ms. Power Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) ................... Mr. Ramírez Carreño Agenda Maintenance of international peace and security Inclusive development for the maintenance of international peace and security Letter dated 6 January 2015 from the Permanent Representative of Chile to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General (S/2015/6) This record contains the text of speeches delivered in English and of the translation of speeches delivered in other languages. The final text will be printed in the Official Records of the Security Council. Corrections should be submitted to the original languages only. They should be incorporated in a copy of the record and sent under the signature of a member of the delegation concerned to the Chief of the Verbatim Reporting Service, room U-0506 ([email protected]). Corrected records will be reissued electronically on the Official Document System of the United Nations (http://documents.un.org). 15-01584 (E) *1501584* S/PV.7361 Maintenance of international peace and security 19/01/2015 The meeting was called to order at 9.35 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Pursue Greater Unity and Progress News Brief
    VOL.50 ISSUE 3 · 2020 《中国人大》对外版 NPC National People’s Congress of China PURSUE GREATER UNITY AND pROGRESS NEWS BRIEF President Xi Jinping attends a video conference with United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres from Beijing on September 23. Liu Weibing 2 NATIONAL PEOPle’s CoNGRESS OF CHINA ISSUE 3 · 2020 3 6 Pursue greater unity and progress Contents UN’s 75th Anniversary CIFTIS: Global Services, Shared Prosperity National Medals and Honorary Titles 6 18 26 Pursue greater unity Global services, shared prosperity President Xi presents medals and progress to COVID-19 fighters 22 9 Shared progress and mutually Special Reports Make the world a better place beneficial cooperation for everyone 24 30 12 Accelerated development of trade in Work together to defeat COVID-19 Xi Jinping meets with UN services benefits the global economy and build a community with a shared Secretary-General António future for mankind Guterres 32 14 Promote peace and development China’s commitment to through parliamentary diplomacy multilateralism illustrated 4 NATIONAL PEOPle’s CoNGRESS OF CHINA 42 The final stretch Accelerated development of trade in 24 services benefits the global economy 36 Top legislator stresses soil protection ISSUE 3 · 2020 Fcous 38 Stop food waste with legislation, 34 crack down on eating shows Top legislature resolves HKSAR Leg- VOL.50 ISSUE 3 September 2020 Co vacancy concern Administrated by General Office of the Standing Poverty Alleviation Committee of National People’s Congress 36 Top legislator stresses soil protection Chief Editor: Wang Yang General Editorial 42 Office Address: 23 Xijiaominxiang, The final stretch Xicheng District, Beijing 37 100805, P.R.China Full implementation wildlife protection Tel: (86-10)5560-4181 law stressed (86-10)6309-8540 E-mail: [email protected] COVER: President Xi Jinping ad- ISSN 1674-3008 dresses a high-level meeting to CN 11-5683/D commemorate the 75th anniversary Price: RMB 35 of the United Nations via video link Edited by The People’s Congresses Journal on September 21.
    [Show full text]
  • September 4, 2019 Hearing Transcript
    HEARING ON U.S.-CHINA RELATIONS IN 2019: A YEAR IN REVIEW HEARING BEFORE THE U.S.-CHINA ECONOMIC AND SECURITY REVIEW COMMISSION ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2019 Printed for use of the United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission Available via the World Wide Web: www.uscc.gov UNITED STATES-CHINA ECONOMIC AND SECURITY REVIEW COMMISSION WASHINGTON: 2019 U.S.-CHINA ECONOMIC AND SECURITY REVIEW COMMISSION CAROLYN BARTHOLOMEW, CHAIRMAN ROBIN CLEVELAND, VICE CHAIRMAN Commissioners: ANDREAS A. BORGEAS KENNETH LEWIS JEFFREY L. FIEDLER MICHAEL A. MCDEVITT HON. CARTE P. GOODWIN HON. JAMES M. TALENT ROY D. KAMPHAUSEN MICHAEL R. WESSEL THEA MEI LEE LARRY M. WORTZEL The Commission was created on October 30, 2000 by the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for 2001 § 1238, Public Law No. 106-398, 114 STAT. 1654A-334 (2000) (codified at 22 U.S.C. § 7002 (2001), as amended by the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for 2002 § 645 (regarding employment status of staff) & § 648 (regarding changing annual report due date from March to June), Public Law No. 107-67, 115 STAT. 514 (Nov. 12, 2001); as amended by Division P of the “Consolidated Appropriations Resolution, 2003,” Pub L. No. 108-7 (Feb. 20, 2003) (regarding Commission name change, terms of Commissioners, and responsibilities of the Commission); as amended by Public Law No. 109- 108 (H.R. 2862) (Nov. 22, 2005) (regarding responsibilities of Commission and applicability of FACA); as amended by Division J of the “Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008,” Public Law Nol. 110-161 (December 26, 2007) (regarding responsibilities of the Commission, and changing the Annual Report due date from June to December); as amended by the Carl Levin and Howard P.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Power Projection in Historical Perspective
    THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY OF RICE UNIVERSITY JAPANESE ENERGY SECURITY AND CHANGING GLOBAL ENERGY MARKETS: AN ANALYSIS OF NORTHEAST ASIAN ENERGY COOPERATION AND JAPAN’S EVOLVING LEADERSHIP ROLE IN THE REGION IN HARM’S WAY? CHINESE POWER PROJECTION IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE RICHARD J. STOLL PROFESSOR OF POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RICE UNIVERSITY Prepared in conjunction with an energy study sponsored by The Center For International Political Economy and The James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy Rice University – May 2000 In Harm’s Way? Chinese Power Projection in Historical Perspective Introduction China is clearly a major power, and has had a long series of years of significant economic growth, and while China's economy may slow its growth, there is every reason to believe that China will continue to enhance its position in Asia and throughout the world. Should this be a cause for concern? Should we view China at the turn of the 21st century as comparable to Germany at the turn of the 20th century – i.e., as a state growing more powerful that will seek to use its industrial might to build a significant ability to project power, and engage in conflictual behavior as part of a drive to achieve dominance? Or will China enhance its position, particularly in Asia, by becoming a source of stability in the region? There are a variety of ways to examine this question. I choose to cast my gaze back in time and study the historical record.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sino-Russian Partnership and the East Asian Order
    Asian Perspective 42 (2018), 355 –386 The Sino-Russian Partnership and the East Asian Order Elizabeth Wishnick After dismissing the Sino-Russian partnership for the past decade, scholars now scramble to assess its significance, particularly with US foreign policy in disarray under the Trump administration. I examine how China and Russia manage their relations in East Asia and the impact of their approach to great power management on the creation of an East Asian order. According to English School theorist Hedley Bull, great power management is one of the ways that order is created. Sino-Russian great power management involves rule making, a distinctive approach to crisis manage - ment, and overlapping policy approaches toward countries such as Burma and the Philippines. I conclude with a comparison between Sino-Russian great power management and the US alliance system, note a few distinctive features of the Trump era, and draw some conclusions for East Asia. KEYWORDS : China, Russia, East Asia, great power, order. AFTER DISMISSING THE SINO -R USSIAN PARTNERSHIP FOR THE PAST decade, scholars now scramble to assess its significance, partic - ularly with US foreign policy in disarray under the Trump admin - istration. Is the Sino-Russian partnership a transactional relation - ship, destined for failure as China rises? Is it an alliance? Is it based on enduring shared norms or less securely premised on transactional interests? Focusing on what partnership is or is not, while interesting as a scholarly exercise, does not, however, advance our understanding of its mechanisms and impact on East Asia. Following the English School and the writings of Hedley Bull, I argue that Russia and China are seeking to create a society of states that defines a pluralist East Asian order.
    [Show full text]
  • Hard Power in Cyberspace: CNA As a Political Means
    2016 8th International Conference on Cyber Conflict Permission to make digital or hard copies of this publication for internal use within NATO and for personal or educational use when for non-profit or non-commercial Cyber Power purposes is granted providing that copies bear this notice and a full citation on the N.Pissanidis, H.Rõigas, M.Veenendaal (Eds.) first page. Any other reproduction or transmission requires prior written permission by NATO CCD COE. 2016 © NATO CCD COE Publications, Tallinn Hard Power in Cyberspace: CNA as a Political Means Ragnhild Endresen Siedler Analysis Division Norwegian Defence Research Establishment Kjeller, Norway Abstract: This analysis is a contribution to the scholarly debate on how cyber power influences international relations. It answers the following question: In what ways can an actor apply CNA to dominate an opponent, and what may restrict him in this effort? It uses Schelling’s (2008) argument for dividing power into coercion and brute force, and thus the paper distinguishes between actions that inflict harm and those that impose limitations. Through this approach, it describes the difference between CNA as a means of pure destruction and CNA as a means of forcible accomplishment in order to elucidate different ways of using CNA. This analytical approach aims at generating insight into the nature of CNA threats, which in turn, facilitates development of appropriate responses. The paper argues that defensive cyber strategies and doctrines primarily should focus on CNA as a means of forcible accomplishment. However, it also discusses CNA in the form of coercive threats. It explores this type of power by assessing how the technological and organizational preconditions of CNA apply to severity of consequences and credibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Portends Continued Tension
    CHINA- TAIWAN RELATIONS ELECTION PORTENDS CONTINUED TENSION DAVID G. BROWN, JOHNS HOPKINS SCHOOL OF ADVANCED INTERNATIONAL STUDIES KYLE CHURCHMAN, JOHNS HOPKINS SCHOOL OF ADVANCED INTERNATIONAL STUDIES President Tsai Ing-wen triumphed over her populist Kuomintang (KMT) opponent Han Kuo-yu in Taiwan’s January 11, 2020 presidential election, garnering 57.1% of the vote to Han’s 38.6%. Tsai’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) also retained its majority in the Legislative Yuan (LY), albeit with the loss of some seats to the KMT and third parties. While there has been considerable attention to Beijing’s influence operations, the election illustrated Beijing’s limited ability to manipulate Taiwan elections. The outcome portends continued deadlock and tension in cross-strait relations in the coming months. Meanwhile, Taipei and Washington have strengthened ties by launching a series of bilateral and multilateral cooperative projects, intended in part to counter both Beijing’s influence operations and its continuing diplomatic, economic, and military pressures on Taiwan. This article is extracted from Comparative Connections: A Triannual E-Journal of Bilateral Relations in the Indo-Pacific, Vol. 21, No. 3, January 2020. Preferred citation: David G. Brown and Kyle Churchman, “China-Taiwan Relations: Election Portends Continued Tension,” Comparative Connections, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp 69-78. CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS | JANUARY 2020 69 Presidential Election Campaign used existing policies to demonstrate sympathy for Hong Kong by accepting fleeing Hong Kong Throughout the fall campaign, Tsai Ing-wen activists seeking temporary residence in Taiwan steadily improved her prospects for winning and welcoming students from disrupted Hong reelection in the January 11, 2020 presidential Kong universities.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Control and Expeditionary Power Projection
    Sea Control and Expeditionary Power Projection Tailored Force Packages To Meet Our National Strategy Brigadier General Thomas L. Conant, USMC Director, Capabilities Development Directorate Marine Corps Combat Development Command1 Quantico, Virginia Our Mission • “ ...THE SEIZURE AND DEFENSE OF ADVANCED NAVAL BASES AND FOR THE CONDUCT OF SUCH LAND OPERATIONS AS MAY BE ESSENTIAL TO THE PROSECUTION OF A NAVAL CAMPAIGN. • ...DEVELOP, IN COORDINATION WITH THE ARMY, NAVY AND AIR FORCE, THE DOCTRINE, TACTICS, TECHNIQUES, AND EQUIPMENT EMPLOYED BY LANDING FORCES IN AMPHIBIOUS OPERATIONS. • …PERFORM SUCH OTHER DUTIES AS THE PRESIDENT MAY DIRECT.” NATIONAL SECURITY ACT OF 1947 AS AMENDED BY TITLE 10, U.S. CODE IN 1952 2 Our Tradition: Most Ready When the Nation is Least Ready Why We’re Unique • Maneuver Warfare Philosophy – Nature of war: a violent struggle between hostile, independent, irreconcilable wills… – …Chaos, friction, & uncertainty – Combine high-tempo ops with a bias for action – …To achieve advantage – in any dimension. • Expeditionary Heritage – Primarily a naval force, equally home at sea or ashore – Operating from very austere environments – worldwide – Across the full range of military operations • Concepts: Organize, Deploy, Employ – Integrated concepts – The Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF) 3 The Naval Operating Concept (NOC) A Mandate for Change 4 NOC Focus Areas “A Shared Navy - Marine Corps Assessment” Focus Areas Long-standing Emerging The NOC provides the conceptual foundation for Naval capability 5 development in support of CONPLAN 7500 and Homeland Defense. Recent Operations by U.S. Amphibious Forces 76 applications of amphibious capability in the past 23 years, covering the range of activities described in the National Defense Strategy; 21 can be classified as forcible entry operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2: the China Model: Return of the Middle Kingdom
    SECTION 2: THE CHINA MODEL: RETURN OF THE MIDDLE KINGDOM Key Findings • The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) seeks to revise the inter- national order to be more amenable to its own interests and authoritarian governance system. It desires for other countries not only to acquiesce to its prerogatives but also to acknowledge what it perceives as China’s rightful place at the top of a new hierarchical world order. • The CCP’s ambitions for global preeminence have been con- sistent throughout its existence: every CCP leader since Mao Zedong has proclaimed the Party would ultimately prove the superiority of its Marxist-Leninist system over the rest of the world. Under General Secretary of the CCP Xi Jinping, the Chi- nese government has become more aggressive in pursuing its interests and promoting its model internationally. • The CCP aims to establish an international system in which Beijing can freely influence the behavior and access the mar- kets of other countries while constraining the ability of others to influence its behavior or access markets it controls. The “com- munity of common human destiny,” the CCP’s proposed alter- native global governance system, is explicitly based on histor- ical Chinese traditions and presumes Beijing and the illiberal norms and institutions it favors should be the primary forces guiding globalization. • The CCP has attempted to use the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic to promote itself as a responsible and benevolent global leader and to prove that its model of governance is su- perior to liberal democracy. Thus far, it appears Beijing has not changed many minds, if any.
    [Show full text]
  • People-Centered Urbanization Program Oct22
    Permanent Mission of Italy Permanent Mission of the People’s to the United Nations Republic of China to the United Nations WORLD CITIES DAY 2014 LEADING URBAN TRANSFORMATIONS ECOSOC Chamber – 31 October 2014 (9:30am - 12:30pm) People-centred Urbanisation, Managing Social Inclusion in Today’s Cities Background For the first time in history, in 2008, more than half of the world’s population was recorded to be living in towns and cities. This number is constantly on the rise and is expected to reach almost five billion by 2030 (6.3 billion by 2050). Cities have increasingly become a concentration of peoples with diverse backgrounds, different cultural and ethnic origins and beliefs. The challenges that this new identity and diversity pose for countries and, more broadly, regions are today heightened when concentrated in extremely reduced geographical spaces. Cities of all sizes often struggle to find resources and apply good practices to respond to the magnitude of this change. In fact, cities are faced with the end results of transnational and internal migration1 that further exacerbates challenges already faced by cities in providing equitable access to urban services and infrastructure, including housing, services and employment, and in ensuring adequate planning for the accelerated urban growth. Yet, Local Authorities have little if any say over international and national migration policies and they have little capacity to control migratory flows into their cities. 1 The People’s Republic of China is the biggest country in the world in terms of internal migration, which amounted to 166 million in 2013. See China Science Center of International Eurasian Academy of Sciences/ China Association of Mayors/ Urban Planning Society of China/ UN-Habitat (2014).
    [Show full text]