DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Introduction 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Introduction 3 Docking Farm Solar Project Planning, Design and Access Statement September 2020 Docking Farm Solar Project Planning, Design and Access Statement Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 3 2 SITE CONTEXT AND EXISTING USE 4 3 THE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL 5 4 PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT 9 5 PLANNING ASSESSMENT 9 6 CONCLUSION 12 Appendix 1 – Environmental Impact Assessment screening opinion September 2020 1 Docking Farm Solar Project Planning, Design and Access Statement Issue Sheet Report Prepared for: Docking Farm Solar Limited Docking Farm Solar Project, at Land north of The Street, Cawston Planning, Design and Access Statement Prepared by: Name: Jane Crichton Title: Senior Associate Planner (MRTPI) Approved by: Signature: Name: Ian Douglass Title: Head of Planning Date: September 2020 September 2020 2 Docking Farm Solar Project Planning, Design and Access Statement 1 Introduction 1.1 This planning statement supports a full planning application for the proposed development of a ground mounted solar farm which will cover an area of approximately 35.67 hectares on land north of The Street, Cawston on behalf of Docking Farm Solar Limited. The development includes associated infrastructure namely inverters, transformers, a DNO substation and battery storage. The farm will have an export capacity of 28 Megawatt (MW). 1.2 This statement should be read in conjunction with the following documents submitted as part of the planning application: • Application form and necessary certificates; • Site Location Plan; • Existing Site Plan; • Proposed Site Plan; • Proposed technical drawings: • Energy Store Container PL-002 • Inverter PL-005 • Fence and Construction Roads PL-007 • Mounting Structure PL-008 • Temporary Construction Area PL-009 • Storage Container PL-010 • Site Selection Assessment (Lanpro); • Statement of Community Involvement (Lanpro); • Preliminary Ecological Assessment, including Mitigation Management Plan (Wild Frontier); • Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy (Rossi Long); • Desk Based Archaeology and Heritage Assessment (Lanpro); • Agricultural Land Classification Report (Richard Stock); and • Landscape Appraisal including LVIA and Landscape Mitigation Plan (Proworks). • Traffic Impact Assessment (Rossi Long) 1.3 This planning statement addresses the Development Plan and material planning considerations. 1.4 The applicant has obtained an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) screening opinion in accordance with Schedule 2 3 (a) Energy Industry of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (ref: 20201012 please refer to Appendix 1 for a copy). This confirmed that the development was not considered to constitute EIA development, therefore this application does not require to be accompanied by an Environmental Statement. The development has been subject to pre-application discussions with Broadland District Council. September 2020 3 Docking Farm Solar Project Planning, Design and Access Statement 2 Site Context and Existing Use 2.1 The application site (the site) covers an area of approximately 35.67 hectares and is located north of The Street, Cawston. The site is located south of the village of Oulton Street north of Cawston. The site falls within the parish of Cawston and borders the parishes of Oulton and Heydon. 2.2 The proposed site comprises three agricultural fields. The site is bounded to the east and west by agricultural land. To the south west is Bluestone Plantation and to the north are a number of poultry sheds. To the north west there is a ground mounted solar farm. The permission for this development (ref 20150952), allowed development of over 17.1ha but only part of it has been built. Therefore, the permission is extant and the remaining phases can still be built out. The Street runs along the eastern boundary which connects Cawston/Southgate and Oulton Street. The B1149 runs along the southern boundary is the main route between Holt and Horsford which is on the outskirts of Norwich. Both of these roads are subject to national speed limit (60mph). 2.3 The nearest residential dwellings are located to the north east of the site and is surrounded by a large number of trees which separate it from the site; and to the south west of the site which is located at the junction of The Street and the B1149. Along the north eastern boundary the hedge line is also dispersed with trees. The hedgerows are in good condition and have been left to grow to a reasonable height. To the north west of the site there is a small plantation of trees which is fairly dense. 2.4 There are no Public Rights of Way (PRoW) which run through the site and adjacent to it. The nearest is Marriott’s Way which is approximately 660m south east of the site. Given the nature of Marriotts Way being an old railway line, it sits lower than the surrounding land along large parts of it. The part of it closest to the site has substantial vegetation including hedgerows and trees on both sides of the route which means there are no views from it to the site. 2.5 There are overhead power lines which cross the site in a north/south direction. These serve the project’s point of connection into UKPN’s 33kV grid. 2.6 The site is within flood zone 1 as identified on the Governments Flood Risk maps but does have two small areas at risk of surface water flooding in accordance with mapping. 2.7 The site does not accommodate any listed buildings or Scheduled Monuments (SAM). The closest heritage assets are Heydon and Salle Conservation Area which is located on the western side of the B1149 (Bluestone Plantation is located within it). Beerhouse Farmhouse is located 520m south of the site which is Grade II. Heydon Hall is located 1000m west of the site and is a Grade II* listed Registered Park and Garden. 2.8 The nearest Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) is the Cawston and Marsham Heaths SSSI which is located approximately 2.8km south east of the site. September 2020 4 Docking Farm Solar Project Planning, Design and Access Statement 3 The Development Proposal 3.1 This section sets out the proposed development, and the design and access elements of the scheme. 3.2 Given the vast number of renewable energy technologies available today, solar technology is one of the most favourable and is highly suited to the proposed site. Solar PV technology is relatively unobtrusive, sympathetic to the surrounding area, easy to deploy, commercially proven and reliable whilst making best use of the land. 3.3 The proposed development consists of a number of different elements which are detailed below. Solar Panels 3.4 The solar pv panels proposed will be a standard polycrystalline type which are intended for the daylight levels at this site. The installation is free draining through perimeter gaps around all panels and dispersed rainwater runoff. The proposal will comprise the installation of photovoltaic (PV) panels laid out in arrays of rows running from east to west across the site, the number of these will be dictated by the finalised layout. The height of the panels will be at a maximum of 3 meters above the ground. 3.5 The mounting structure for the panels is a metal frame securely fixed to the ground. It must be capable of withstanding appropriate environmental stresses for the location, such as wind or snow loading. The panels will be fixed on the mounting frame. The structure will also provide a route for electrical wiring. 3.6 The solar panels will be installed at 25° from the horizontal. The rows will be placed at an appropriate distance apart (likely to be around 5 metres) in order to optimise solar collection per unit land area. 3.7 The mounting posts will be pile-driven approximately 1.5 metres into the ground for support, dependent on ground conditions and will be easily retrieved using similar hydraulic equipment when the solar farm is decommissioned, and the land reinstated back to agricultural land. Such supporting systems are designed to avoid the use of mass concrete foundations on site. Infrastructure 3.8 The development will also require the installation of associated infrastructure required for the running of a solar farm which includes: • 2 x Substation and DNO substation – Maximum height of 3.8m. (14.64sqm each) • 3 x Battery storage containers – Maximum height of 3m. (29.28sqm each) • 6 x Inverter transformers – Maximum height of 3.5m. (14.77sqm each) • 21 x CCTV cameras – Maximum height of 3m. • Perimeter fence – Maximum height of 2.5m. 3.9 Many of the above items are housed within a GRP type enclosure which can be colour coded to an appropriate colour if considered necessary. The site perimeter fence is typically constructed using wooden posts and wire mesh. Additional planting will be introduced for screening purposes where necessary. September 2020 5 Docking Farm Solar Project Planning, Design and Access Statement 3.10 The installation of CCTV will be required onsite for insurance purposes. The CCTV will be capable of viewing the solar pv farm only (without panning angles beyond). No floodlighting will be used as the CCTV cameras detect movement and have night vision capability in accordance with insurer's requirements. These will allow for constant monitoring but will be positioned in such a way to prevent areas outside the site being monitored. The CCTV camera poles will likely be constructed in galvanised steel. As much of the equipment as possible will be colour coordinated with the landscape. Where possible it will be green in colour. 3.11 It is proposed that wildflower mix will be planted underneath the panels. Grid Connection 3.12 The solar farm will be connected to the grid via the existing 33kV overhead lines which cross the site. In addition, there is a UK Power Network’s requirement for the project to be connected to the existing substation to the north-west of the solar farm (labelled ESS on the proposed site layout plan) via a fibreoptic cable.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Statement of Common Ground Natural England
    Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Statement of Common Ground Natural England Applicant: Norfolk Vanguard Limited Document Reference: Rep1 - SOCG - 13.1 Revision: 1 Date: January 2019 Author: Royal HaskoningDHV Photo: Kentish Flats Offshore Wind Farm Date Issue Remarks / Reason for Issue Author Checked Approved No. 22/08/18 00 First draft for Internal review GK/ST JA JA 23/08/18 01D First draft for Norfolk Vanguard Limited review GK/ST JA JA 05/09/18 02D Second draft for legal review GK/ST JA JA 10/10/2018 03D Third draft for Norfolk Vanguard Limited review GK/JA AD AD 17/10/18 04D Fourth draft for Norfolk Vanguard Limited review GK JA JA 12/11/18 05D Fifth draft for Norfolk Vanguard Limited review GK JA JA 20/11/18 06D Sixth draft for Norfolk Vanguard Limited review GK JA JA 03/01/19 07D Seventh draft GK/JA GK/JA JA 08/01/19 08D Eighth draft GK/JA GK/JA JA 11/01/19 09D Submission for Deadline 1 GK/JA GK/JA RS Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Page i Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 The Development ......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Consultation with Natural England ................................................................ 2 2 Statement of Common Ground ..................................................................... 3 2.1 Marine Geology, Oceanography and Physical Processes ................................. 3 2.2 Benthic and Intertidal Ecology ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Committee Agenda
    Planning Committee Agenda Members of the Planning Committee: Cllr S Lawn (Chairman) Cllr J M Ward (Vice-Chairman) Cllr A D Adams Cllr C Karimi-Ghovanlou Cllr S C Beadle Cllr I N Moncur Cllr N J Brennan Cllr S M Prutton Cllr J F Fisher Cllr S Riley Cllr R R Foulger Pool of trained substitutes Conservative Conservative Liberal Democrat Cllr S M Clancy Cllr G K Nurden Cllr D J Britcher Cllr J K Copplestone Cllr C E Ryman-Tubb Cllr S J Catchpole Cllr A D Crotch Cllr M D Snowling Cllr D G Harrison Cllr R M Grattan Cllr J L Thomas Cllr S I Holland Cllr K S Kelly Cllr K A Vincent Cllr K E Lawrence ** Not trained Cllr D King Cllr S A Vincent Cllr J A Neesam Cllr K G Leggett Cllr S C Walker Cllr L A Starling Cllr T M Mancini-Boyle Cllr F Whymark Cllr D M Thomas Cllr M L Murrell Date & Time: Wednesday 21 April 2021 at 9:30am Place: To be hosted remotely at: Thorpe Lodge, 1 Yarmouth Road, Thorpe St Andrew, Norwich Contact: Dawn Matthews tel (01603) 430404 Email: [email protected] Website: www.broadland.gov.uk PUBLIC ATTENDANCE: This meeting will be live streamed for public viewing via the following link: Broadland YouTube Channel You may register to speak by emailing us at [email protected] no later than 3pm on Friday 16 April 2021 Large print version can be made available If you have any special requirements in order to attend this meeting, please let us know in advance.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Appendix 23.1 Onshore Winter / Passage Bird Survey Scoping Report
    Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Appendix 23.1 Onshore Winter / Passage Bird Survey Scoping Report Environmental Statement Volume 3 - Appendices Applicant: Norfolk Vanguard Limited Document Reference: 6.2.23.1 RHDHV Reference: PB4476-005-0231 Pursuant to: APFP Regulation 5(2)(a) Date: June 2018 Revision: Version 1 Author: Royal HaskoningDHV Photo: Kentish Flats Offshore Wind Farm Environmental Impact Assessment Environmental Statement Document Reference: PB4476-005-0231 June 2018 For and on behalf of Norfolk Vanguard Limited Approved by: Ruari Lean, Rebecca Sherwood Signed: th Date: 8 June 2018 For and on behalf of Royal HaskoningDHV Drafted by: Gordon Campbell Approved by: Jon Allen Signed: th Date: 25 May 2018 Environmental Statement Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm PB4476-005-0231 Page ii Date Issue Remarks / Reason for Issue Author Checked Approved No. 09/04/18 01D First draft for Norfolk Vanguard Limited review GC/MG RH AD 25/05/18 01F Final for ES submission GC/MG ST AD Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm PB4476-005-0231 Page iii Table of Contents 23 Onshore Winter Passage Bird Survey Scoping Report ............................................... 1 23.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 23.2 Methodology .......................................................................................................... 5 23.3 Baseline Environment ........................................................................................... 10 23.4 Screening
    [Show full text]
  • GREATER NORWICH DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP TECHNICAL CONSULTATION FULL REPORT (Final Draft)
    GREATER NORWICH DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP TECHNICAL CONSULTATION FULL REPORT (Final draft) Prepared for Greater Norwich Development Partnership Thorpe Lodge, Yarmouth Road Thorpe St Andrew Norwich NR7 0DU Prepared by: Michael Mackman BA (Hons), MMRS, FCIM, Chartered Marketer 14 November 2008 Greater Norwich Development Partnership – Joint Core Strategy Consultation P08872 14 November 2008 Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Obviously, the evaluation of the comments on the GNDP Regulation 25 consultation is a matter for the Partnership. However, it may be helpful to draw out some common and recurring themes. There are many expressions of concern about the effects of further development on key local infrastructure. These include (but are not exclusively) water and sewerage, health services, transportation/ roads, community facilities and infrastructure, education, policing and the environment (including impacts on SSSIs, nature reserves and green spaces). Many respondents express views to the effect that local resources are at capacity or above, and that further development must bring with it benefits to support new populations, wherever housed. There are particular concerns in some rural communities, although some also welcome controlled development as a means of assuring or enhancing local services, and request a higher development “status” or the development of specific sites. Others are concerned about “knock on” effects on local infrastructure, including roads, local schools and so on. This is coupled with concerns about sustainability, the desirability of “green infrastructure” and about ensuring that new development has the minimum carbon footprint. There are also suggestions about measures to improve the carbon footprint of existing developments, for example, through renewables technology. Unsurprisingly, these concerns are balanced by suggestions from agents, landowners, developers and businesses suggesting the desirability of additional development, or the development of specific sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D – Maps and Appraisal Tables of Proposed Waste
    Appendix D – Maps and appraisal tables of proposed waste management facilities Page Map legend D2 Breckland site maps D3 WS1 Land at Summer Lane, Carbrooke D3 WS2 Former mineral working at Heath Road, Snetterton D4 Broadland site maps D5 WS3 Land at Atlas Works, Norwich Road, Lenwade D5 WS4 Land off Long Lane, Ludham D6 King’s Lynn and West Norfolk site maps D7 WS5 – Land off Mill Drove, at Blackborough End landfill site D7 WS6 – Land north of Main Road, Crimplesham D8 Appraisal tables WS1 Land at Summer Lane, Carbrooke D9 WS2 Former mineral working at Heath Road, Snetterton D13 WS3 Land at Atlas Works, Norwich Road, Lenwade D17 WS4 Land off Long Lane, Ludham D22 WS5 Land off Mill Drove, at Blackborough End landfill site D26 WS6 Land north of Main Road, Crimplesham D30 Please note that there are no proposed sites located within the following Local Planning Authority Areas: Great Yarmouth, North Norfolk, South Norfolk. D1 D2 WS1 - Land at Summer Lane, Carbrooke D3 WS2 Former mineral working at Heath Road, Snetterton D4 WS3 Land at Atlas Works, Norwich Road, Lenwade D5 WS4 Land off Long Lane, Ludham D6 WS5 – Land east of Mill Drove, at Blackborough End landfill site D7 WS6 – Land at Main Road, Crimplesham D8 Appraisal tables of proposed waste management sites WS1 Land at Summer Lane, Carbrooke, IP25 6TJ Proposal: screening, separating and bulking of waste materials, composting and soil treatment. The site is proposed to take hazardous, non-hazardous and inert waste. Estimated throughput: 100,000 to 120,000 tonnes per annum Size of site: 9.3 ha SA Objective Comments Assessment of Waste Management Uses SA1: To adapt to The site is 0.27km from Watton and + and mitigate the 10km from Dereham, which are the The proposed waste management effects of climate nearest towns.
    [Show full text]
  • RSPB REEDBED Plan Co-Ordinator: RSPB Plan Leader: Date: Stage: 31 December 1998 Final Draft June 2004 Revised Draft (Under Review) August 2005 Final Revised Draft
    NORFOLK BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN Ref 1/H1 Tranche 1 Habitat Action Plan 1 Plan Author: RSPB REEDBED Plan Co-ordinator: RSPB Plan Leader: Date: Stage: 31 December 1998 Final draft June 2004 Revised draft (under review) August 2005 Final revised draft 1. CURRENT STATUS Definition • Reedbed is defined in this plan as S4 NVC communities; all other communities containing reed to be included in the fen action plan. • In Broadland, the fen resource has been surveyed and mapped. The distribution of reedbed vegetation by valley is as follows: S4 S4 transitions S26 Ant Valley 43.76ha 8.7ha 4.75ha Thurne Valley 112.95ha 25.92ha 3.13ha Muckfleet Valley 10.49ha 0.06ha 4.07ha Bure Valley 27.68ha 5.9ha 64.39ha Yare Valley 43.64ha - 279.07ha Waveney Valley 6.46ha 0.92ha 63.75ha • A rare habitat. The RSPB Reedbed Inventory suggests over 1,540 ha in Norfolk - almost 30% of the UK resource. However, the definition of reedbed used for this inventory was wider than that proposed here. Tables 1 and 2 below show the sites over 20 and 10 ha respectively from the inventory excluding known fen sites. • Reedbeds of less than 10 hectares are listed in Table 3 below. Some of these sites are known to support priority species, including bittern. • Over 50 species of conservation concern in Norfolk depend fully or partly on reedbeds and associated fens. However further research is necessary to fully identify the status of many species. The following are likely to provide the main focus: • birds - bittern, bearded tit, marsh harrier, Savi’s warbler; • mammals - otter, water shrew, harvest mouse; • moths - small dotted footman, Fenn’s wainscot, reed leopard; • other invertebrates - including BAP species such as the diving beetle (Bidessus unistriatus).
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: 6.3.22.11 RHDHV Reference: PB5640-006-2211 Pursuant to APFP Regulation: 5(2)(A)
    Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Appendix 22.11 Norfolk Vanguard Onshore Ecology Consultation Responses Environmental Statement Volume 3 Applicant: Norfolk Boreas Limited Document Reference: 6.3.22.11 RHDHV Reference: PB5640-006-2211 Pursuant to APFP Regulation: 5(2)(a) Date: June 2019 Revision: Version 1 Author: Royal HaskoningDHV Photo: Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm Date Issue Remarks / Reason for Issue Author Checked Approved No. 14/02/2019 01D First draft for Norfolk Boreas Limited review GC CD/ AmH CD 22/03/2019 01F Final for DCO submission GC CD JL Environmental Statement Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm 6.3.22.11 June 2019 Page i Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 2 Consultation responses Norfolk Vanguard ............................................................... 1 3 References ........................................................................................................... 33 Environmental Statement Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm 6.3.22.11 June 2019 Page ii Tables Table 2.1 Norfolk Vanguard Consultation and Comments 2 Environmental Statement Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm 6.3.22.11 June 2019 Page iii Glossary of Acronyms CoCP Code of Construction Practice DCO Development Consent Order EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ES Environmental Statement ETG Expert Topic Group HVAC High Voltage Alternating Current HVDC High Voltage Direct Current OLEMS Outline Landscape and Ecological Management Strategy PEIR Preliminary Environmental Information Report SoS Secretary of State Glossary of Terminology Cable pulling Installation of cables within pre-installed ducts from jointing pits located along the onshore cable route. Ducts A duct is a length of underground piping, which is used to house electrical and communication cables. Evidence Plan Process A voluntary consultation process with specialist stakeholders to agree the approach to the EIA and information to support the HRA.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Rivers Drainage Board
    Water Management Alliance (Eastern) Norfolk Rivers Drainage Board BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN April 2018 NORFOLK RIVERS IDB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN Front cover images (L-R) ; Himalayan Basalm; Barn Owl; White Clawed Crayfish; Otter; River Nar; IDB Digger 2 FOREWORD This Biodiversity Action Plan (Second Edition) has been prepared by the Norfolk Rivers Internal Drainage Board, in accordance with the commitment to the Implementation Plan of the DEFRA Internal Drainage Board Review, requiring IDBs to produce their own Biodiversity Action Plans by April 2010. As such, the original version was published in January 2010. This revised version aims to continue to align the Norfolk Rivers IDB with biodiversity policy and more specifically, the Biodiversity document for England, “Biodiversity 2020: A strategy for Englands’ Wildlife and Ecosystem Services” and build on the Government’s 25 Year Environmental Plan; A Green Future. In doing so, the document strives to demonstrate the Board’s commitment to fulfilling its duty as a public body under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006, to conserve biodiversity. Many of the Board’s activities have benefits and opportunities for biodiversity, not least its water level management and watercourse maintenance work. It is hoped that this Biodiversity Action Plan will help the Board to maximise the biodiversity benefits from its activities and demonstrate its contribution to the targets as part of the Biodiversity 2020 strategy and achieve wider environmental improvement within its catchments. The Board has adopted the Biodiversity Action Plan as one of its policies and subject to available resources is committed to its implementation. It will review the plan periodically and update it as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • County Wildlife Sites – Breckland 2018
    County Wildlife Sites – Breckland 2018 Site Site Name Last Survey Transboundary Grid reference Number Date (T) or registered common (C) 169 Coston Meadow 85 T (SN) 170 River Yare Corridor 85 T (SN) 177 Bickerston Meadow 9/95 T (SN) 178 The Carrs 6/95 T (SN) 541 West and Pentney Commons 9/95 & 6/97 T (WN) 542 Sovereign Meadow 10/95 T (WN) 593 Little Ouse Meadow 85 TM 003800 594 Little Fen 7/96 TM 035792 595 The Lows 7/09 TM 032789 596 Adj. Little Fen 85 TM 046799 597 Old Fen 9/95 TM 000807 598 Broomscott Common 7/16 C TM 004806 599 Oak Plantation 85 TM 006803 600 Wood near Garboldisham 5/96 TM 016846 601 Lang Fen (South) 4/96 TM 063800 602 Holland’s Wood 5/96 TM 050822 603 Lopham Grove 85 TM 062838 604 Broom Covert and Downhill Plantation 09/07 TM 020863 605 East Harling Fen 8/96 TM 000874 607 The Lows 8/96 TM 014880 608 West of Quidenham 6/96 TM 020877 611 Arnold’s Belt 85 TM 043880 614 Adj. to River Wittle 8/96 TM 009880 615 East Harling Common 8/96 TM 005882 616 Adj. River Wittle 8/96 TM 008881 618 Common Plantation 8/96 TM 035885 619 Copince’s Fen 85 TM 049883 620 Eccles Wood (North) 8/96 TM 013895 621 Eccles Wood (Middle) 8/96 TM 013893 622 Eccles Wood (South) 8/96 TM 017890 623 The Carr 5/96 TM 024890 624 Jubilee Plantation 5/96 TM 064896 625 Warren and Nuttery Plantation 5/96 TM 062898 626 Stacksford Wood 8/13 TM 052903 627 Lower Plantation 5/96 TM 060905 630 New Buckenham Common (north) 85 C TM 095910 632 East of Old Buckenham Fen 5/96 TM 052921 633 Abbey Farm Meadow 5/96 TM 073926 634 West Moor 85 TM 067946 635 Hargham Estate 5/96
    [Show full text]
  • I YARE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN I I CONSULTATION
    NRA-Anglian 59 i YARE CATCHMENT I MANAGEMENT PLAN I CONSULTATION REPORT ~ L /: SPAIDING • »«*»»■ « NRA National Rivers Authority Anglian Region January 1994 ■ E n v ir o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD YARE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOREWORD Established in 1989 the National Rivers Authority has as it’s role the "Guardians of the Water Environment". As such it is committed to protecting and improving the water environment in its broadest sense. Establishing a sound planning base for the development of river catchments is essential to our future management. Integrated Catchment Management Planning will play an increasingly important role in the NRA’s management of the water environment. Demands upon catchments are many and varied, and conflicts require careful consideration. The enhancement of the water environment is one of the main aims of consultation with individuals and organisations having an interest in the catchment is seen as essential. This report examines the Rivers Yare, Wensum, Bure and Waveney catchments. A large proportion of the plan area is recognised internationally as being environmentally important and the tidal reaches of the rivers form one of Europe’s most important lowland wetlands. The Broads which are a fundamental part of the unique nature of the catchment are under stress due to over-enrichment. Our current research is central to Broads Restoration and reflects the NRA’s belief that such initiatives alongside this consultation form an important way of maintaining co-operation and collaboration within the catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Statement
    Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm Onshore Ecology Clarification Notes - Position Statement Document Reference: ExA; ISH4; 10.D6.9 Deadline 6 Date: 05 April 2019 Photo: Kentish Flats Offshore Wind Farm Table of Contents 1 Summary of Onshore ecology Clarification Notes .......................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Clarification Note – Water Dependent Designated Sites ................................ 1 1.3 Clarification Note – Bat Impact Assessment – Paston Great Barn Special Area of Conservation (SAC) ................................................................................... 1 1.4 Clarification Note – Sediment Management at the River Wensum crossing ... 2 1.5 Clarification Note – Other Outstanding Issues ............................................... 4 Appendix 1 – Norfolk Vanguard Clarification Notes ........................................................... 5 Appendix 2 - Natural England’s responses ....................................................................... 10 Position Statement Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm April 2019 Page i 1 SUMMARY OF ONSHORE ECOLOGY CLARIFICATION NOTES 1.1 Introduction 1. During the Issue Specific Hearing on Environmental Matters (ISH4) on 27 March 2019, the Examining Authority (ExA) requested a position statement regarding outstanding issues following Natural England’s response to four clarification notes produced by the Applicant in relation to onshore ecology (Action
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Nat Env 2016-18.Pub
    State of the Natural Environment in Norfolk 2016 - 2018 Danielle Engelbrecht and Lizzy Oddy Norfolk Biodiversity Information Service Coverphoto: Fieldof Orchids © Danielle Engelbrecht, Above: Hoof fungus © Danielle Engelbrecht Fragrant Orchid at Whitwell Common © Ed Stocker 2 State of the Natural Environment in Norfolk Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………… 4 Species in Norfolk ……………………………………………... 5 How many species have been recorded in Norfolk? ………………….. 6 Non-native species in Norfolk ……………………………………………. 6 Species case study: Anguilla anguilla - The European Eel …………… 7 Species case study: Lasius neglectus - The UK’s first invasive ant spe- 8 cies….…………………………………………………………………………. New & nearly new species for Norfolk 2016-17 ………………………….. 9 New & nearly new species for Norfolk 2017-18 ………………………….. 10 Species case study: Loxia pytyopsittacus - Parrot Crossbill………………. 11 Species case study: Anacamptis morio - Green-winged Orchid ………. 12 Habitats in Norfolk ……………………………………………. .. 13 Habitat types in Norfolk and why they are important …………………... 13 Habitat case study: Pingos ………………………………………………... 16 Habitat case study: Lowland Heathland ………………………………... 17 Protected sites in Norfolk …………………………………….. 18 What does the site designation mean? …………………………………. 19 The effect of public access & recreation on Natura 2000 Sites ……. 21 SSSI and Local Site condition ……………………..…………………….. 22 Protected site case study: Whitwell Common SSSI …………………... 23 Protected site case study: Hickling Broad NNR, SSSI, Ramsar, SPA 24 and SAC …………………………………………………………………….. 3 Introduction The natural environment is one of Norfolk’s greatest assets. Its landscapes and wildlife draw in people from far afield, whilst its habitats and protected sites support fantastic species diversity. From the majestic north coast, to the rolling arable fields, from the lakes and ditches of the Broads to the forests of Breckland, there is something to discover in every corner of the county.
    [Show full text]