DOCSLIB.ORG

Elated.Co.Za Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Enhancing the Lives of Animals Through Ethical Decisions The Microsanctuary Revolution – For Rescued Farm Animals Table Of Contents Welcome to Elated! 4 Elated’s Mission: 5 About Karen 10 Why Vegan? 13 How to Transition to Vegan 15 Helping Your Mother Prepare Vegan Meals for You 26 Do You Love Animals More Than People? 28 What Do You Do When People Attack You for Being Vegan? 32 How Can You Say it's Easy to be Vegan? 35 What Do You Do When You Go Vegan and Your Partner Doesn't? 38 Being Vegan on a Budget 40 What You Can Do 42 Vegan Education 46 Vegan Quotes 49 Biblical Quotes 65 Islamic Quotes 76 Buddhist Quotes 82 Prayer for the Liberation of Animals 97 The Great Bell Chant - The End of Suffering 99 The Art of Mindful Living - Eating Together 101 The True Lives of Farmed Animals 103 Fish Exploited for Food Suffer Like Mammals and Birds 105 The Microsanctuary Revolution - for Rescued Farm Animals 112 Fish Exploited for Food Suffer Like Mammals and Birds Page 1 The Microsanctuary Revolution – For Rescued Farm Animals The Truth About Milk and Dairy 115 My Personal Tribute to Doris 124 Portrait of Marcie a Beautiful Soul 126 Two Animal Voices I Will Never Forget 132 Turkeys All Dressed Up With Nowhere to Go 136 Give Up Red Meat Without Trading Animals' Lives 139 Seeing for Two - If His Mother Could See Him Now 145 Caring About Live Sheep Export is Not Enough 148 How Gisela Survived the Dairy Farm 150 Why Care About Farm Animals? 154 Goats' Milk Kills Kids 158 Did You Know My Mother? 163 The Humane Myth 165 No Humane Dairy Products Here 166 Choosing to Swallow the Happy Farm Blue Pill 169 Humane Truth Masquerading as Satire 173 More Room to Die 175 Animal Rights 178 Do Animals Need a Bill of Rights? 179 Why Not Single Issue Campaigns and Petitions? 187 Is Killing Animals Ever Morally Excusable? 196 Telling it Like it Is 199 Redefining Ethical Food Choices 202 Glossary of Animal Rights Terms 205 Other Animals 218 Fish Exploited for Food Suffer Like Mammals and Birds Page 2 The Microsanctuary Revolution – For Rescued Farm Animals Will Human Tissue Testing Replace Animal Testing Anytime Soon? 220 Are Issues Surrounding Animals Really Complicated? 222 Do You Love Your Pets Unconditionally? 226 Are You Neglecting Your Dog? 235 Animal Testing is Not Good Science 239 What do You Do When Your Easter Bunny Grows Up? 243 Animals Do Not Make Good Gifts 245 Voice of the Voiceless 248 Save Our Environment 251 Heal Your Health 253 Vegan Health 253 Nutritarian Basics 255 Vegan Nutritarian Basics 256 Nutritarian Food Groups 257 Your Vegan Food Pyramid 260 The Health Benefits of Going Vegan 263 Vegan Meal Plans 269 Vegan Food Groups 271 Animal Derived Ingredients 277 Is Palm Oil Vegan? 295 What About GM Soya? 299 Are Your Battling to Give Up Dairy? 303 Fish Exploited for Food Suffer Like Mammals and Birds Page 3 The Microsanctuary Revolution – For Rescued Farm Animals Welcome to Elated! Elated invites you to choose a vegan lifestyle. We ask this rst and foremost for the animals. Their lives and their bodies are not ours to use. This is about compassion, but it is also about justice. Being vegan is the single most important thing you can do to save our environment, heal your health and free farm animals. You may be surprised at how easy it is. You will also discover that being a joyful vegan, and an ethical vegan are one and the same thing. Free Farmed Animals Heal Your Health Save Our Environment Elated strives to end the exploitation of farmed animals and help people live a joyful vegan life. This eBook is a compilation of articles from elated.co.za 2007-2016 Fish Exploited for Food Suffer Like Mammals and Birds Page 4 The Microsanctuary Revolution – For Rescued Farm Animals Elated’s Mission: Help people transition towards a vegan lifestyle. Empower consumers to make ethical food choices. Offer guidelines to follow a healthier, plant-based diet. Create a demand for cruelty-free products. Free farm animals by reducing the demand for animal products. Encourage people to acknowledge the sentience of farm animals. Stimulate a paradigm shift away from viewing animals as property. Educate people about the true lives of farm animals. Debunk the myths surrounding ‘humane ‘ animal products. Raise awareness for the environmental implications of stock farming. Function as an information resource for vegans and people who want to transition towards being vegan. Mainstream Elated’s founding philosophy is that consumers have the power to save the lives of animals through ethical decisions, right now, right here, in the mainstream community. We don’t have to move to a commune, or live in a vegan bubble. In fact, it is far more benecial for animals, if we stay in touch with society and practice mainstream veganism. By ‘consumers’ we mean you and me. We create the demand for vegan products by purchasing them. Compassionate The driving concept behind all Elated’s actions is compassion towards animals and humans. We do not endorse violence towards property or other sentient beings. Violence and prejudice are the problems. Compassion and enlightenment are the solutions. Compassionate direct action engages in vegan education as the most effective and enduring way to save the lives of animals. We also strive for the abolition of all animal suffering. No animal suffering is necessary. No animal suffering is acceptable. True compassion protects the rights of animals to life, freedom and bodily integrity absolutely. There are no compromises and no betrayal of their trust. Fish Exploited for Food Suffer Like Mammals and Birds Page 5 The Microsanctuary Revolution – For Rescued Farm Animals Abolitionist We believe all animals are sentient beings who are self-aware and conscious of their lives as well as their presence in this world. We believe that animals have the right to be classied as moral persons and not as property. Animals have the right to life, freedom and bodily integrity. These rights are absolute. All animal use results in the violation of these rights. In accordance with this principle, we do not support incremental animal welfare reforms as they promote prescribed methods of connement, mutilation, rape, kidnap and slaughter. Elated will not take part in any campaign that sanctions any such exploitation of animals. Instead, we strive for the abolition of animal ownership. Fish Exploited for Food Suffer Like Mammals and Birds Page 6 The Microsanctuary Revolution – For Rescued Farm Animals The Six Principles of the Abolitionist Approach to Animal Rights — Prof Gary L Francione 1. The abolitionist approach to animal rights maintains that all sentient beings, humans or nonhumans, have one right: the basic right not to be treated as the property of others. 2. Our recognition of the one basic right means that we must abolish, and not merely regulate, institutionalized animal exploitation—because it assumes that animals are the property of humans. 3. Just as we reject racism, sexism, ageism, and heterosexism, we reject speciesism. The species of a sentient being is no more reason to deny the protection of this basic right than race, sex, age, or sexual orientation is a reason to deny membership in the human moral community to other humans. 4. We recognize that we will not abolish overnight the property status of nonhumans, but we will support only those campaigns and positions that explicitly promote the abolitionist agenda. We will not support positions that call for supposedly “improved” regulation of animal exploitation. We reject any campaign that promotes sexism, racism, heterosexism or other forms of discrimination against humans. 5. We recognize that the most important step that any of us can take toward abolition is to adopt the vegan lifestyle and to educate others about veganism. Veganism is the principle of abolition applied to one’s personal life and the consumption of any meat, fowl, sh, or dairy product, or the wearing or use of animal products, is inconsistent with the abolitionist perspective. 6. We recognize the principle of nonviolence as the guiding principle of the animal rights movement. Violence is the problem; it is not any part of the solution. Fish Exploited for Food Suffer Like Mammals and Birds Page 7 The Microsanctuary Revolution – For Rescued Farm Animals Ethical Elated’s denition of ‘ethical decisions ‘ requires the moral baseline for any decision to be: the animals’ bodies and their lives are not ours to exploit. If you care about animals the least you can do is to not eat them, wear them or buy them. It claries the issues, as you will no longer have to spend hours of your time and invest your emotional energy into weighing up the options. We ask that animals receive justice. Elated will support you in your transition to a vegan lifestyle, but we will never condone or promote the sale of an animal’s body parts. That action would constitute a betrayal of our acknowledgement of their right to personhood, and of their place in our moral community. Fish Exploited for Food Suffer Like Mammals and Birds Page 8 The Microsanctuary Revolution – For Rescued Farm Animals We put the animals rst and seek to end their suffering. The important distinction between abolition and regulation is that we aim to reduce the number of animals who suffer, by abstaining from the consumption of meat, sh, dairy and eggs. We will not endorse the arbitrary distinction of less suffering being more acceptable than more suffering. All suffering is suffering, and it is never justiable to purposely inict suffering on another living being.
Recommended publications
  • Prefatory Notes

    Prefatory Notes

    BETWEEN THE SPECIES WINTER 1991 ~ Vol. 7 No.1 Between tlte Species is published quarterly by the EDITORS Schweitzer Center of the San Francisco Bay Institute! George Abbet Congress of Cultures. We encourage readers to send Steven F. Sapontzis us philosophical essays, reviews, interviews, poetry, John Stockwell stories, and art for possible publication. Materials submined for publication must be accompanied by a CONTRIBUTING EDITORS stamped, self-addressed mailing envelope. Betwee" George P. Cave the Species is primarily ajouma1 of moral philosophy, but activists' and scientific contributions are also Stephen Clark welcome. Inquiries, letters, manuscripts, books, and Michael 1. Cohen subscription orders should be sent to: MiChael W. Fox Ann Cottrell Free Betwttn tlte Species Richard Grossinger Judith Hampson P.O. Box2S4 Berkeley, California 94701, U.S.A. Gerald Jones (Telephone: 415-526-5346) Mark Juergensmeyer Marti Kheel Elizabeth Lawrence Subscription rates: individuals (real persons) Charles Magel $15.00 annually (single copies $4.(0), institutions Jim Nollman $25.00 annually. A 40% discount on the institutional Tom Regan price is given to Humane Societies and Animal Bernard Rollin Protection and Welfare organizations. Orders from Peter Singer outside the U.S. and Canada are sent by smface mail; if air mail is preferred, please include an additional Jon Wynne-Tyson U.S. $15.00 when subscribing, U.S. $3.50 on single GRAPHICS ADVISORS copy orders. Ifordering from outside the U.S., please arrange for your reminances to be payable in Elizabeth Newman U.S. dollars drawn on a bank located in the U.S., or Bev Parish send an international money order or bank draft or Mary Starin personal check in your currency at the current rate of exchange.
  • Western Civilisation 'Maintains Itself By

    Western Civilisation 'Maintains Itself By

    Western Civilisation ‘maintains itself by banishing Others (nature, animals, women, children) to the margin’.1 How do Notions of Alterity and/or Marginalisation Feature in the Representation of Animals? Georgia Horne Humans’ relationship with animals is a complexly mutable one, with the parameters of distinction being repeatedly rethought and redrawn by thinkers from a range of disciplines. The protean nature of these irreconcilable views is apparent given how, as observed by John Berger, throughout history animals have been concurrently bred yet sacrificed, subjected to suffering yet worshipped in idolatry.2 Accordingly, animals have continuously occupied a liminal space both above and below (but never with) man, a form of existential dualism reflective of the seemingly irresolvable struggle of where to place them in relation to humans. The site of difference between humans and other animals is where we derive our ontological concepts of humanity and animality and thus, ultimately, our place in the world as one species amongst others (an admittedly anthropocentric telos). Traditionally, ontological discourse on this issue has been dominated by an animal-human dichotomy, wherein the subjects are defined in opposition to each other.3 The privation of certain attributes are cited as evidence for this polarity, with philosophers such as Kant, Descartes and Aristotle citing humans’ capacity to reason as the qualifying criterion that simultaneously demarcates humans from animals, and endows us with a superiority over them. This binary contradistinction is threatened in Franz Kafka’s ‘A Report to an Academy’, which utilises various postcolonial narrative strategies to obfuscate the human-animal distinction, destabilising the West’s confident certainty in the Otherness of animals, and complicating the ethics of using animals’ assumed alterity to justify their marginalisation and mistreatment.
  • Putting a Price on Whales to Save Them: What Do Morals Have to Do with It?

    Putting a Price on Whales to Save Them: What Do Morals Have to Do with It?

    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2013 Putting a Price on Whales To Save Them: What Do Morals Have To Do with It? Hope M. Babcock Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1653 43 Envtl. L. 1-33 (2013) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Animal Law Commons, and the Environmental Law Commons TOJCI.BABCOCK – NEW ABSTRACT 2/23/2013 1:10 PM Essay PUTTING A PRICE ON WHALES TO SAVE THEM: WHAT DO MORALS HAVE TO DO WITH IT? BY HOPE M. BABCOCK* The author explores the moral implication of a proposal to create an international market in whale shares as an alternative to the dysfunctional International Whaling Commission. She finds the proposal amoral because whales, like humans, have an intrinsic right to life. Since this leaves whales vulnerable to whale hunting nations, she suggests that international environmental organizations might help a whale preservation norm emerge in whaling nations by using education and interventionist activities that focus on whaling’s cruelty to ultimately encourage the citizens and governments of those nations to change their self-image as whale eating cultures. * Hope Babcock is a professor of law at Georgetown University Law School. This Essay was first presented as the Twenty-fifth Natural Resources Law Institute Distinguished Visitor Lecture given at Lewis & Clark Law School in October 2012, and originated in an Article entitled Why Changing Norms Is a More Just Solution to the Failed International Regulatory Regime to Protect Whales than a Trading Program in Whale Shares, forthcoming in the Stanford Environmental Law Journal (2012).
  • An Analysis on the Notion and Representation of The

    An Analysis on the Notion and Representation of The

    Accepted Crimes: An Analysis on the Notion and Representation of the Non-Human Animal and its Rights in J.M. Coetzee, The Lives of Animals through the character of Elizabeth Costello. Treball de Fi de Grau/ BA dissertation Author: Oriol Jiménez Batalla Supervisor: Dr. Felicity Hand Departament de Filologia Anglesa i de Germanística Grau d‘Estudis Anglesos June 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 0. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1. Theoretical Framework ...................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Human Animal vs. Non-Human Animal .............................................................................. 3 1.2. Non-Human Animals: Singer vs. Regan ............................................................................... 5 1.3. Non-Human Animals: Coetzee ............................................................................................. 15 2. Elizabeth Costello .............................................................................................................. 20 2.1. The Philosophy Behind the Character ................................................................................ 20 2.2. Costello vs. Coetzee .................................................................................................................. 30 2.3. Costello as the Non-Human Animal .................................................................................... 32 3. Conclusions
  • The Lives of Animals

    The Lives of Animals

    The Lives of Animals J. M. COETZEE THE TANNER LECTURES ON HUMAN VALUES Delivered at Princeton University October 15 and 16, 1997 J. M. COETZEE holds a chair in General Literature at the University of Cape Town. He received degrees in litera- ture and mathematics at the University of Cape Town and received his Ph.D. from the University of Texas at Austin in 1969. He has been a visiting professor at numerous uni- versities, including Johns Hopkins, Harvard, and the Uni- versity of Chicago. He is a fellow of the Royal Society of Literature and an honorary member of the American Acad- emy of Arts and Sciences. His first work of fiction was published in 1974. Since then he has published seven novels, three works of criticism, and a memoir, as well as translations from the Dutch and Afrikaans. His fiction, which includes The Master of Petersburg (1994), Waiting for the Barbarians (1982), and In the Heart of the Coun- try (1977), has been translated into sixteen languages and has won several major awards. The Life and Times of Michael K. (1983) won both Britain’s Booker Prize and France’s Prix Femina Etranger. He was awarded the Jeru- salem Prize in 1987. LECTURE I. THE PHILOSOPHERS AND THE ANIMALS He is waiting at the gate when her flight comes in. Two years have passed since he last saw his mother; despite himself, he is shocked at how she has aged. Her hair, which had had streaks of gray in it, is now entirely white; her shoulders stoop; her flesh has grown flabby.
  • The Evolution of Animal Play, Emotions, and Social Morality: on Science, Theology, Spirituality, Personhood, and Love

    The Evolution of Animal Play, Emotions, and Social Morality: on Science, Theology, Spirituality, Personhood, and Love

    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 12-2001 The Evolution of Animal Play, Emotions, and Social Morality: On Science, Theology, Spirituality, Personhood, and Love Marc Bekoff University of Colorado Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/acwp_sata Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Behavior and Ethology Commons, and the Comparative Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Bekoff, M. (2001). The evolution of animal play, emotions, and social morality: on science, theology, spirituality, personhood, and love. Zygon®, 36(4), 615-655. This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Evolution of Animal Play, Emotions, and Social Morality: On Science, Theology, Spirituality, Personhood, and Love Marc Bekoff University of Colorado KEYWORDS animal emotions, animal play, biocentric anthropomorphism, critical anthropomorphism, personhood, social morality, spirituality ABSTRACT My essay first takes me into the arena in which science, spirituality, and theology meet. I comment on the enterprise of science and how scientists could well benefit from reciprocal interactions with theologians and religious leaders. Next, I discuss the evolution of social morality and the ways in which various aspects of social play behavior relate to the notion of “behaving fairly.” The contributions of spiritual and religious perspectives are important in our coming to a fuller understanding of the evolution of morality. I go on to discuss animal emotions, the concept of personhood, and how our special relationships with other animals, especially the companions with whom we share our homes, help us to define our place in nature, our humanness.
  • Chimpanzee Rights: the Philosophers' Brief

    Chimpanzee Rights: the Philosophers' Brief

    Chimpanzee Rights: The Philosophers’ Brief By Kristin Andrews Gary Comstock G.K.D. Crozier Sue Donaldson Andrew Fenton Tyler M. John L. Syd M Johnson Robert C. Jones Will Kymlicka Letitia Meynell Nathan Nobis David M. Peña-Guzmán Jeff Sebo 1 For Kiko and Tommy 2 Contents Acknowledgments…4 Preface Chapter 1 Introduction: Chimpanzees, Rights, and Conceptions of Personhood….5 Chapter 2 The Species Membership Conception………17 Chapter 3 The Social Contract Conception……….48 Chapter 4 The Community Membership Conception……….69 Chapter 5 The Capacities Conception……….85 Chapter 6 Conclusions……….115 Index 3 Acknowledgements The authors thank the many people who have helped us throughout the development of this book. James Rocha, Bernard Rollin, Adam Shriver, and Rebecca Walker were fellow travelers with us on the amicus brief, but were unable to follow us to the book. Research assistants Andrew Lopez and Caroline Vardigans provided invaluable support and assistance at crucial moments. We have also benefited from discussion with audiences at the Stanford Law School and Dalhousie Philosophy Department Colloquium, where the amicus brief was presented, and from the advice of wise colleagues, including Charlotte Blattner, Matthew Herder, Syl Ko, Tim Krahn, and Gordon McOuat. Lauren Choplin, Kevin Schneider, and Steven Wise patiently helped us navigate the legal landscape as we worked on the brief, related media articles, and the book, and they continue to fight for freedom for Kiko and Tommy, and many other nonhuman animals. 4 1 Introduction: Chimpanzees, Rights, and Conceptions of Personhood In December 2013, the Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP) filed a petition for a common law writ of habeas corpus in the New York State Supreme Court on behalf of Tommy, a chimpanzee living alone in a cage in a shed in rural New York (Barlow, 2017).
  • 71 Reports Reports

    71 Reports Reports

    EBA�EBA 11/3 71 discussion sessions which gave REPORTS participants the opportunity to discuss animal rights issues with one another in detail. Particularly .. interesting were speeches by Irv Hershenbaum, key figure in the United , .�. CONFERENCE: ACTION FOR LIFE, Farm Workers' Union, Congressman JULY 2-5, 1981, CEDAR CREST Any Jacobs, and Broadway and COLLEGE, ALLENTOWN, PA. television actress and animal rights activist, Gretchen Wyler. The recent Action for Life Con­ Irv Hershenbaum, who accepted, ference on animal rights and vegetar­ on behalf of Cesar Chavez, the third ianism, held from July 2-5, 1981, in annual Vegetarian Ethic Award, pre­ the congenial surroundings of Cedar sented by the Vegetarian Information Crest College in Allentown, Pa., was Service, spoke on the United Farm the first of its kind. It differed Workers' movement and its ideological from previous conferences in focus­ links with the vegetarian and animal ing its attention on educating its rights movements. Indiana Congress­ participants about animal abuses and man Andy Jacobs, who agreed to speak vegetarianism primarily with a view at the conference in the face of to mobilization for effective politi­ considerable opposition, discussed cal action. Consistent with the the moral and legal foundations for values represented by the conference, the attribution of rights to non­ the meals provided for the partici­ human animals. Gretchen Wyler pants were entirely vegan. related the trials and tribulations of her largely successful attempt to Meticulously orchestrated by push a "bill of rights" for animals Alex Hershaft, general manager and through the California legislature. President of the Vegetarian Informa­ tion Service, the conference moved In terms of the aims of the briskly through its program without conference, however, the most valuable wasted energy or futile digressions.
  • Animals in Media Genesis Honors the Best

    Animals in Media Genesis Honors the Best

    12 | THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES Animals in Media Genesis Honors the Best The HSUS President & CEO Wayne Pacelle, actor James Cromwell, and Joan McIntosh. Genesis Awards founder Gretchen Wyler. he power of the media to project the joy of celebrating animals Wyler came up with the idea for an awards show because she strongly Tand to promote their humane treatment was demonstrated believed that honoring members of the media encourages them to anew at the 20th Anniversary HSUS Genesis Awards staged before spotlight more animal issues, thus increasing public awareness and a glittering audience at California’s Beverly Hilton Hotel in March. compassion. The annual event began as a luncheon with 140 attendees The ceremonies presented awards in 21 print, television, and film and quickly grew into a large gala in Beverly Hills, California, with categories and honored dozens of talented individuals from news more than 1,000 guests. and entertainment media. Beginning with the first ceremony, Genesis Awards entries have The annual celebration recaptured some of the extraordinary events been submitted by the public and by media professionals. Categories that occurred in 2005, from the massive effort to rescue animals span television, film, print, radio, music, and the arts. The awards abandoned in the wake of Hurricane Katrina to such perennial committee chooses winners by secret ballot and the 17 committee concerns as fur, factory farming, and wildlife abuses. It also marked members are selected because of their lengthy personal histories the retirement of HSUS Vice President Gretchen Wyler, who founded in working for the animals.
  • Vegan-Friendly Restaurants

    Vegan-Friendly Restaurants

    WELCOME Hello and thank you for taking a look inside this guide! We, the Animal Advocates of South Central PA, created it for you to use as a compass on your path towards a kinder, healthier life. We are an organization promoting a conscious and compassionate lifestyle which can be summed up in one word: Veganism. It isn’t like other vegan guides, though. It’s tailored for individuals living in South Central Pennsylvania (SCPA) to make your transition as easy as possible. We will lightly touch on the reasons to go vegan (but we highly suggest doing research elsewhere!) and how to make those changes. We will cover everything from where to go out to eat on a Friday night, to what cruelty-free body care brands to check out, and everything in between. We would like to thank you for considering this impactful, wonderful lifestyle, and hope we can assist you on your journey! After exploring this guide, please visit our website, which has many helpful resources, including local restaurant lists, blog articles, and links for further reading. www.animaladvocatesscpa.com Follow us on social media to see what we are up to! “Do the best you can until you know better. Then when you know better, do better”. -Maya Angelou 2 Vegan Guide for South Central PA WHY GO VEGAN? For The Animals | For The Environment For Our Health | For Everything! There are many reasons people go vegan. In some cases, it’s for the environment. Animal agriculture is a significant ecological problem, contributing more greenhouse gas emissions than the entire transportation sector.
  • Charging Forward for Animals

    Charging Forward for Animals

    2006 HSUS Annual Report Celebrating Animals | Confronting Cruelty Charging Forward for Animals R59542.indd C1 5/22/07 14:14:27 Offi cers Directors David O. Wiebers, M.D. Leslie Lee Alexander, Esq. Chair of the Board Patricia Mares Asip Anita W. Coupe, Esq. Peter A. Bender Vice Chair of the Board Barbara S. Brack Walter J. Stewart, Esq. Board Treasurer Anita W. Coupe, Esq. Wayne Pacelle Neil B. Fang, Esq., C.P.A. President & CEO Judi Friedman G. Thomas Waite III David John Jhirad, Ph.D. Treasurer & CFO Jennifer Leaning, M.D., S.M.H. Roger A. Kindler, Esq. General Counsel & CLO Kathleen M. Linehan, Esq. Janet D. Frake William F. Mancuso Secretary Mary I. Max Andrew N. Rowan, Ph.D. Patrick L. McDonnell Executive Vice President Operations Gil Michaels Michael Markarian Judy Ney Executive Vice President Judy J. Peil External Affairs Marian G. Probst The HSUS by the Numbers . 1 Joshua S. Reichert, Ph.D. Ending Abuse and Suffering: An Epic Battle on Many Fronts . 2 Jeffery O. Rose Uncaging the Victims of Factory Farming: Remarkable Progress for Reforms . 4 James D. Ross, Esq. Taking the Fight to the Courts: Aggressive Litigation Gets Fast Results . 6 Marilyn G. Seyler The Next Time Disaster Strikes: Animals Won’t Be Left Behind . .8 Walter J. Stewart, Esq. The Depravity Worsens: Animal Fighting Takes an Ugly Turn . 10 John E. Taft Animals in Media: Genesis Honors the Best . 12 Andrew Weinstein Drawing a Bead on Blood Sports: Shooting Down Hunters and Tax Cheats . 14 Persia White Last Roundup for Equine Butchers: No More U.S.
  • Jm Coetzee and Animal Rights

    Jm Coetzee and Animal Rights

    J.M. COETZEE AND ANIMAL RIGHTS: ELIZABETH COSTELLO’S CHALLENGE TO PHILOSOPHY Richard Alan Northover SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF ENGLISH LITERATURE IN THE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA PRETORIA, 0002, SOUTH AFRICA Supervisor: Professor David Medalie OCTOBER 2009 © University of Pretoria Abstract The thesis relates Coetzee’s focus on animals to his more familiar themes of the possibility of fiction as a vehicle for serious ethical issues, the interrogation of power and authority, a concern for the voiceless and the marginalised, a keen sense of justice and the question of secular salvation. The concepts developed in substantial analyses of The Lives of Animals and Disgrace are thereafter applied to several other works of Coetzee. The thesis attempts to position J.M. Coetzee within the animal rights debate and to assess his use of his problematic persona, Elizabeth Costello, who controversially uses reason to attack the rationalism of the Western philosophical tradition and who espouses the sympathetic imagination as a means of developing respect for animals. Costello’s challenge to the philosophers is problematised by being traced back to Plato’s original formulation of the opposition between philosophers and poets. It is argued that Costello represents a fallible Socratic figure who critiques not reason per se but an unqualified rationalism. This characterisation of Costello explains her preoccupation with raising the ethical awareness of her audience, as midwife to the birth of ideas, and perceptions of her as a wise fool, a characterisation that is confirmed by the use of Bakhtin’s notion of the Socratic dialogue as one of the precursors of the modern novel.