DOCSLIB.ORG

Part 1. the Life and Influence of Lyeil

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Part 1. the Life and Influence of Lyeil Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021 Part 1. The life and influence of Lyeil For geology, Lyell proved to be the right man at the right time in the right place. He grew up in comfortable surroundings, encouraged by his parents to develop a keen observation of the natural world around him. He learned the importance of geological observations in the field and the precise and accurate recording of geological information, which led him to travel extensively across Europe and North America to examine a wide range of geological phenomena. The knowledge and ideas that he gained from field observations and the work of fellow geologists were clearly the foundations for his great work Principles of Geology. In the first paper of this book, Martin Rudwick analyses Principles of Geology through successive editions as a dynamic development of geology 'as one long argument'. Lyell, more than anyone, established geology as a scientific discipline, hence the word 'Principles' in the title of his book, and gave it credibility both amongst practitioners of the subject and, equally importantly, amongst the wider, literate public. It is his legacy that nowadays we take for granted that geology can be treated as a science, and that we use modern analogues to interpret and quantify past geological events and processes. Rudwick demonstrates how important it was to Lyell to be thoroughly conversant with the geological literature of his day - and that he learnt French, German and Italian in order to do so - and to engage in debate with his peers, many of whom were Fellows of the Geological Society. Lyell played an active part in its development, serving in turn as Secretary, Foreign Secretary and President. John Thackray, the Society's Archivist, writes about Lyell's role as a Fellow between 1819 and his death in 1875. John gives us an insight of how the Society operated in those days, with constraints on the presentation of formal papers at evening meetings largely to factual descriptions, although greater latitude was given to theorize and speculate in Presidential Addresses. The real value of the evening meetings, however, came in the unrecorded, informal debates that followed the formal presentations. The encouragement of controversy endured in the Society through the debating chamber layout of the Meeting Room until 1972 when it was modernized into the current lecture room. In the next paper, Leonard Wilson gives us an insight into Lyell's life, the people he met who influenced his thinking, and the development of his ideas on Uniformitarianism. In particular, he demonstrates Lyell's tenacity and determination in working out from field evidence the structure and formation of volcanoes like Vesuvius, Mount Etna, Tenerife, Grand Canary and Madeira and disproving the theory that they had formed, by catastrophic upheaval, as 'craters of elevation'. Wilson staunchly defends Lyell's strict interpretation of uniformitarianism against those who regarded the Earth as having cooled from an originally hot body, not least Lord Kelvin who calculated the age of the Earth from an estimate of its rate of cooling. Later on, as Wilson explains, Lyell became increasingly interested in the human timespan on Earth, culminating in the Antiquity of Man published in 1863. Ezio Vaccari discusses the reception to Lyell's ideas in Europe as Principles of Geology and Elements of Geology were reviewed and translations of them began to be published in the 1830s. Vaccari is able to demonstrate the wide acceptance of most of Lyell's views apart from the same reservations as his English colleagues (explained in Rudwick's paper) about the constancy of geological history, most preferring the model of a cooling Earth with a diminishing level of tectonic activity through geological time. It would seem that De Beaumont's synthesis of mountain building processes linked with the cooling of the Earth's crust may have been more influential. None the less, Lyell's personal influence was strong as a consequence of his travels and his meetings with most of the leading geologists of Europe. He was recognized as far as Moscow and was elected a member of the Moscow Naturalist Society in 1855. Russian translations of his works began to appear from 1859. Bringing things up to date, Prof. E. E. Milanovsky, as current Vice President, delivered a formal Jubilee Address to the Geological Society during the Bicentenary Lyell Meeting. Robert Dott gives us an account of Lyell's travels in North America. Lyell visited North America four times from 1841 to 1853 not only to travel and see the geology, but also to give public lectures. Dott traces the emergence of geology through a study of Lyell's changing lecture topics. Dott demonstrates that there was a true interaction between American geologists and Lyell, to their mutual benefit. Clearly Lyell brought stature to the new science of geology which increasingly gained public acceptance. Lyell gained, however, much from American geologists, especially in relation to field work. As Dott points out, many of his North American field examples are used to illustrate new concepts in successive editions of his books. Lyell's exposure to American life not only led to new geological understanding but also developed his interest in aspects of education, public reforms and religious belief. On his return to London, Lyell soon became the resident expert on North America, fuelled by the publication of two books on his travels in North America and numerous letters and articles. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021 2 PART 1 Lyell's visit to America is further amplified by Gerald Friedman who concentrates on his visit to New York State in 1841. Friedman discusses Lyell's visit to Amos Eaton, an influential American geologist, just before he died. Together with Eaton's former student James Hall, Lyell visited Niagara Falls, details of which he was to use later in his publications. Much of Lyell's activity in New York did not relate to geology, but Friedman also discusses a resentment that some felt about the use by Lyell of their unpublished work in their volumes. It is clear, however, that Lyell did much to aid the public understanding of this new and exciting science. The relationship between Lyell and Darwin has always been a fascinating one. Clearly Darwin was highly influenced by Lyell and indeed it is well known that he took volume one of the 'Principles' with him on his voyage of the Beagle. Indeed, on his return from the Beagle, Darwin and Lyell became close friends. It was Lyell who suggested that Darwin and Wallace should publish a joint paper on the origin of species. Clearly Lyell did not readily accept Darwin's idea on the origin of species, but over time was gradually converted to the idea of evolution but not necessarily by natural selection. It was inevitable that Lyell should consider the geological evidences of the antiquity of man. As Claudine Cohen points out in the final paper in this section, the publication of his book on the Antiquity of Man in 1863 contributed to the founding of the two scientific disciplines of Pre-historic Archaeology and Palaeoanthropology. In his book Lyell brings to bear aspects of archaeology, palaeontology, anthropology and geology which were used to demonstrate conclusively the contemporaneity of extinct animals and man-made objects. Cohen emphasizes the strong relationship between Lyell and French scientists who mutually benefited from their interactions. Derek J. Blundell Andrew C. Scott Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021 Lyell and the Principles of Geology M. J. S. RUDWICK Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RH, UK Abstract: Lyell's Principles of Geology is still treated more often as an icon to be revered than as the embodiment of a complex scientific argument rooted in its own time and place. This paper describes briefly the origins of Lyell's project, in the international geological debates of the 1820s and in his own early research; the structure of argument of the first edition (1830-1833), and its relation to its intended readership; and the modification of the work in subsequent editions, and the transformation of its strategy in response to its critical evaluation by other geologists. The fluidity of the Principles (and its offshoot the Elements of Geology) reflects the ever-changing interaction between Lyell and his fellow geologists, and between them and a much wider public, during one of the most creative periods in the history of geological science. Lyell's scientific stature is best appreciated if he is placed not on a pedestal but among his peers, in debates at the Geological Society and elsewhere. Charles Lyell's Principles of Geology (first 'principles', but also about the place of such published in 1830-1833) is one of the most signifi- knowledge in a scientific view of the world. cant works in the history of the Earth sciences, but While he was an undergraduate at Oxford, it is still more often cited than read, more often Lyell's adolescent interests in natural history were revered than analysed. Above all, it needs and channelled into geology by the charismatic pre- deserves to be understood in the context of its own sence and famously entertaining lectures of time, before being recruited to support modern William Buckland (Rupke 1983; Wilson 1972). arguments, or repudiated for its failure to support When in 1819 Lyell graduated and moved to them. London to begin a legal career, Buckland sponsored Unlike many comparably important works in the him for membership of the Geological Society history of art or literature, the Principles was not (itself little more than a decade old).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of Geology
    FEBRUARY 2007 PRIMEFACT 563 (REPLACES MINFACT 60) History of geology Mineral Resources Early humans needed a knowledge of simple geology to enable them to select the most suitable rock types both for axe-heads and knives and for the ornamental stones they used in worship. In the Neolithic and Bronze Ages, about 5000 to 2500 BC, flint was mined in the areas which are now Belgium, Sweden, France, Portugal and Britain. While Stone Age cultures persisted in Britain until after 2000 BC, in the Middle East people began to mine useful minerals such as iron ore, tin, clay, gold and copper as early as 4000 BC. Smelting techniques were developed to make the manufacture of metal tools possible. Copper was probably the earliest metal to be smelted, that is, extracted from its ore by melting. Copper is obtained easily by reducing the green copper carbonate mineral malachite, itself regarded as a precious stone. From 4000 BC on, the use of clay for brick-making became widespread. The Reverend William Branwhite Clarke (1798-1878), smelting of iron ore for making of tools and the ‘father’ of geology in New South Wales weapons began in Asia Minor at about 1300 BC but did not become common in Western Europe until Aristotle believed volcanic eruptions and nearly 500 BC. earthquakes were caused by violent winds escaping from the interior of the earth. Since earlier writers had ascribed these phenomena to The classical period supernatural causes, Aristotle's belief was a By recognising important surface processes at marked step forward. Eratosthenes, a librarian at work, the Greek, Arabic and Roman civilisations Alexandria at about 200 BC, made surprisingly contributed to the growth of knowledge about the accurate measurements of the circumference of earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Formal and Informal Networks of Knowledge and Etheldred Benett's
    Journal of Literature and Science Volume 8, No. 1 (2015) ISSN 1754-646X Susan Pickford, “Social Authorship, Networks of Knowledge”: 69-85 “I have no pleasure in collecting for myself alone”:1 Social Authorship, Networks of Knowledge and Etheldred Benett’s Catalogue of the Organic Remains of the County of Wiltshire (1831) Susan Pickford As with many other fields of scientific endeavour, the relationship between literature and geology has proved a fruitful arena for research in recent years. Much of this research has focused on the founding decades of the earth sciences in the early- to mid-nineteenth century, with recent articles by Gowan Dawson and Laurence Talairach-Vielmas joining works such as Noah Heringman’s Romantic Rocks, Aesthetic Geology (2003), Ralph O’Connor’s The Earth on Show: Fossils and the Poetics of Popular Science, 1802-1856 (2007), Virginia Zimmerman’s Excavating Victorians (2008) and Adelene Buckland’s Novel Science: Fiction and the Invention of Nineteenth-Century Geology (2013), to explore the rhetorical and narrative strategies of writings in the early earth sciences. It has long been noted that the most institutionally influential early geologists formed a cohort of eager young men who, having no tangible interests in the economic and practical applications of their chosen field, were in a position to develop a passionately Romantic engagement with nature, espousing an apocalyptic rhetoric of catastrophes past and borrowing epic imagery from Milton and Dante (Buckland 9, 14-15). However, as Buckland further notes, this argument – though persuasive as far as it goes – fails to take into account the broad social range of participants in the construction of early geological knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of French Transformist Ideas for the Second Volume of Lyell’S Principles of Geology Pietro Corsi
    The importance of french transformist ideas for the second volume of lyell’s principles of geology Pietro Corsi To cite this version: Pietro Corsi. The importance of french transformist ideas for the second volume of lyell’s principles of geology. 2004. halshs-00002894 HAL Id: halshs-00002894 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00002894 Preprint submitted on 20 Sep 2004 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THE BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE Vol. II t No. 39 (1978) < 221 > THE IMPORTANCE OF FRENCH TRANSFORMIST IDEAS FOR THE SECOND VOLUME OF LYELL'S PRINCIPLES OF GEOLOGY PIETRO CORSI* RECENTLY there has been considerable revaluation of the development of natural sciences in the early nineteenth century, dealing among other things with the works and ideas of Charles Lyell. The task of interpreting Lyell in balanced terms is extremely complex because his activities covered many fields of research, and because his views have been unwarrantably distorted in order to make him the precursor of various modern scientific positions. Martin Rudwick in particular has contributed several papers relating to Lyell's Principles of geology, and has repeatedly stressed the need for a comprehensive evaluation of Lyell's scientific proposals, and of his position in the culture of his time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wyley History of the Geologists' Association in the 50 Years 1958
    THE WYLEY HISTORY OF THE GEOLOGISTS’ ASSOCIATION 1958–2008 Leake, Bishop & Howarth ASSOCIATION THE GEOLOGISTS’ OF HISTORY WYLEY THE The Wyley History of the Geologists’ Association in the 50 years 1958–2008 by Bernard Elgey Leake, Arthur Clive Bishop ISBN 978-0900717-71-0 and Richard John Howarth 9 780900 717710 GAHistory_cover_A5red.indd 1 19/08/2013 16:12 The Geologists’ Association, founded in 1858, exists to foster the progress and Bernard Elgey Leake was Professor of Geology (now Emeritus) in the diffusion of the science of Geology. It holds lecture meetings in London and, via University of Glasgow and Honorary Keeper of the Geological Collections in the Local Groups, throughout England and Wales. It conducts field meetings and Hunterian Museum (1974–97) and is now an Honorary Research Fellow in the School publishes Proceedings, the GA Magazine, Field Guides and Circulars regularly. For of Earth and Ocean Sciences in Cardiff University. He joined the GA in 1970, was further information apply to: Treasurer from 1997–2009 and is now an Honorary Life Member. He was the last The Executive Secretary, sole editor of the Journal of the Geological Society (1972–4); Treasurer (1981–5; Geologists’ Association, 1989–1996) and President (1986–8) of the Geological Society and President of the Burlington House, Mineralogical Society (1998–2000). He is a petrologist, geochemist, mineralogist, Piccadilly, a life-long mapper of the geology of Connemara, Ireland and a Fellow of the London W1J 0DU Royal Society of Edinburgh. He has held research Fellowships in the Universities of phone: 020 74349298 Liverpool (1955–7), Western Australia (1985) and Canterbury, NZ (1999) and a e-mail: [email protected] lectureship and Readership at the University of Bristol (1957–74).
    [Show full text]
  • The Geohistorical Time Arrow: from Steno's Stratigraphic Principles To
    JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCE EDUCATION 62, 691–700 (2014) The Geohistorical Time Arrow: From Steno’s Stratigraphic Principles to Boltzmann’s Past Hypothesis Gadi Kravitz1,a ABSTRACT Geologists have always embraced the time arrow in order to reconstruct the past geology of Earth, thus turning geology into a historical science. The covert assumption regarding the direction of time from past to present appears in Nicolas Steno’s principles of stratigraphy. The intuitive–metaphysical nature of Steno’s assumption was based on a biblical narrative; therefore, he never attempted to justify it in any way. In this article, I intend to show that contrary to Steno’s principles, the theoretical status of modern geohistory is much better from a scientific point of view. The uniformity principle enables modern geohistory to establish the time arrow on the basis of the second law of thermodynamics, i.e., on a physical law, on the one hand, and on a historical law, on the other. In other words, we can say that modern actualism is based on the uniformity principle. This principle is essentially based on the principle of causality, which in turn obtains its justification from the second law of thermodynamics. I will argue that despite this advantage, the shadow that metaphysics has cast on geohistory has not disappeared completely, since the thermodynamic time arrow is based on a metaphysical assumption—Boltzmann’s past hypothesis. All professors engaged in geological education should know these philosophical–theoretical arguments and include them in the curriculum of studies dealing with the basic assumptions of geoscience in general and the uniformity principle and deep time in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Hutton, Kelvin, and the Great Earth Debates. • the Beginnings of Modern Geology “All Natural Processes That Affect the Earth’S Crust (Erosion, Deposition, • Ca
    Chapter 1 The Science of Geology An Introduction to Geology • Geology - the science that pursues an understanding of planet Earth • Physical geology - examines the materials composing Earth and seeks to understand the many processes that operate beneath and upon its surface • Historical geology - seeks an understanding of the origin of “If there is an interesting place you want to go, there is Earth and its development interesting geology that you can study there” through time Mersin ophiolite, (Cappadocia, Central Turkey). Turkey The Science of Geology The Science of Geology 1.3: satellite image of Mt. Vesuvius, Italy. • Some historical views • Geology, people, and the environment of the Earth • Many important relationships exist between • Aristotle, 300 BC; people and the natural environment • James Ussher, ca. 1600, ‘Earth was created in Problems and issues 4004 BC;’ addressed by • Catastrophism geology include • Earth’s features formed through • Natural hazards, sudden and violent resources, world changes. ‘The Dog population growth, of and environmental Pompeii’ issues Dwelling in Goreme, Cappadocia The Science of Geology Hutton, Kelvin, and the great Earth debates. • The beginnings of modern geology “All natural processes that affect the Earth’s crust (erosion, deposition, • ca. 1780, James Huton’s volcanic eruptions, faulting, glaciation Theory of the Earth; etc.) operate with the same intensity • Uniformitarianism: “the and under the same set of physical processes that operate constraints now as in the geologic past.” today have operated in “(as to the age of Earth) we see no the past.” vestige of a beginning, no prospect of • a uniformitarian view of an end.” Earth requires a vast These points are incorrect - why? amount of time….
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Anning of Lyme Regis: 19Th Century Pioneer in British Palaeontology
    Headwaters Volume 26 Article 14 2009 Mary Anning of Lyme Regis: 19th Century Pioneer in British Palaeontology Larry E. Davis College of St. Benedict / St. John's University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/headwaters Part of the Geology Commons, and the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Larry E. (2009) "Mary Anning of Lyme Regis: 19th Century Pioneer in British Palaeontology," Headwaters: Vol. 26, 96-126. Available at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/headwaters/vol26/iss1/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Headwaters by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@CSB/SJU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LARRY E. DAVIS Mary Anning of Lyme Regis 19th Century Pioneer in British Palaeontology Ludwig Leichhardt, a 19th century German explorer noted in a letter, “… we had the pleasure of making the acquaintance of the Princess of Palaeontology, Miss Anning. She is a strong, energetic spinster of about 28 years of age, tanned and masculine in expression …” (Aurousseau, 1968). Gideon Mantell, a 19th century British palaeontologist, made a less flattering remark when he wrote in his journal, “… sallied out in quest of Mary An- ning, the geological lioness … we found her in a little dirt shop with hundreds of specimens piled around her in the greatest disorder. She, the presiding Deity, a prim, pedantic vinegar looking female; shred, and rather satirical in her conversation” (Curwin, 1940). Who was Mary Anning, this Princess of Palaeontology and Geological Lioness (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Archibald Geikie (1835–1924): a Pioneer Scottish Geologist, Teacher, and Writer
    ROCK STARS Archibald Geikie (1835–1924): A Pioneer Scottish Geologist, Teacher, and Writer Rasoul Sorkhabi, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, USA; [email protected] years later, but there he learned how to write reports. Meanwhile, he read every geology book he could find, including John Playfair’s Illustrations of the Huttonian Theory, Henry de la Beche’s Geological Manual, Charles Lyell’s Principles of Geology, and Hugh Miller’s The Old Red Sandstone. BECOMING A GEOLOGIST In the summer of 1851, while the Great Exhibition in London was attracting so many people, Geikie decided instead to visit the Island of Arran in the Clyde estuary and study its geology, aided by a brief report by Andrew Ramsay of the British Geological Survey. Geikie came back with a report titled “Three weeks in Arran by a young geologist,” published that year in the Edinburgh News. This report impressed Hugh Miller so much that the renowned geologist invited its young author to discuss geology over a cup of tea. Miller became Geikie’s first mentor. In this period, Geikie became acquainted with local scientists and pri- vately studied chemistry, mineralogy, and geology under Scottish naturalists, such as George Wilson, Robert Chambers, John Fleming, James Forbes, and Andrew Ramsay—to whom he con- fessed his desire to join the Geological Survey. In 1853, Geikie visited the islands of Skye and Pabba off the coast Figure 1. Archibald Geikie as a young geolo- of Scotland and reported his observations of rich geology, including gist in Edinburgh. (Photo courtesy of the British Geological Survey, probably taken in finds of Liassic fossils.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation Into the Graphic Innovations of Geologist Henry T
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2003 Uncovering strata: an investigation into the graphic innovations of geologist Henry T. De la Beche Renee M. Clary Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Clary, Renee M., "Uncovering strata: an investigation into the graphic innovations of geologist Henry T. De la Beche" (2003). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 127. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/127 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. UNCOVERING STRATA: AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE GRAPHIC INNOVATIONS OF GEOLOGIST HENRY T. DE LA BECHE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Curriculum and Instruction by Renee M. Clary B.S., University of Southwestern Louisiana, 1983 M.S., University of Southwestern Louisiana, 1997 M.Ed., University of Southwestern Louisiana, 1998 May 2003 Copyright 2003 Renee M. Clary All rights reserved ii Acknowledgments Photographs of the archived documents held in the National Museum of Wales are provided by the museum, and are reproduced with permission. I send a sincere thank you to Mr. Tom Sharpe, Curator, who offered his time and assistance during the research trip to Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • MG17 3 2010 Complete.Pdf 16363KB 26 May 2018
    MERCIAN Geologist VOLUME 17 PART 3 AUGUST 2010 East Midlands Geological Society Contents President Vice-President Mercian News 142 Tim Colman John Travis Geobrowser 143 The Record 146 Secretary Treasurer From the Archives 147 Janet Slatter Colin Bagshaw David G. Bate 149 Editorial Board Sir Henry Thomas de la Beche Tony Waltham Andy Howard and the founding of the British Geological Survey John Carney Tony Morris John N. Carney 166 Alan Filmer Gerry Slavin Magma mixing in the South Leicestershire Diorite: Council evidence from an Ordovician pluton at Croft Quarry Keith Ambrose Duncan Short Tim Colman 173 David Bate Gerry Slavin Gold in Britain: past , present and future Paul Guion Ian Sutton Stephen Gurney, Timothy Astin, Geoffrey Griffi ths 181 Richard Hamblin Neil Turner Origin and structure of Devensian depressions Sue Miles Geoff Warrington at Letton, Herefordshire Gerry Shaw Albert Horton 185 Correspondence Building stones of St Mary’s Church Society Secretary, 100 Main Street, at Colston Bassett, Nottinghamshire Long Whatton, Loughborough LE12 5DG Helen Boynton and Trevor Ford 195 01509 843297 [email protected] William W. Watts, pioneer Midlands geologist Mercian Geologist Editor, Reports 11 Selby Road, Nottingham NG2 7BP 0115 981 3833 [email protected] Members’ Evening, 2010: Shetland: John Aram 203 Mercian Geologist is printed by John Browns; Golcona Mine: John Jones 205 and published by the East Midlands Geological Society. James Hutton: Gerard Slavin, Gerry Shaw, Brenda Slavin 207 No part of this publication may be reproduced in printed or electronic form without prior consent of the Society. Charnian fossils: Helen Boynton 210 ISSN 0025 990X Wave Rock, Australia: Alan Filmer 211 © 2010 East Midlands Geological Society Registered Charity No.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorset and East Devon Coast for Inclusion in the World Heritage List
    Nomination of the Dorset and East Devon Coast for inclusion in the World Heritage List © Dorset County Council 2000 Dorset County Council, Devon County Council and the Dorset Coast Forum June 2000 Published by Dorset County Council on behalf of Dorset County Council, Devon County Council and the Dorset Coast Forum. Publication of this nomination has been supported by English Nature and the Countryside Agency, and has been advised by the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and the British Geological Survey. Maps reproduced from Ordnance Survey maps with the permission of the Controller of HMSO. © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence Number: LA 076 570. Maps and diagrams reproduced/derived from British Geological Survey material with the permission of the British Geological Survey. © NERC. All rights reserved. Permit Number: IPR/4-2. Design and production by Sillson Communications +44 (0)1929 552233. Cover: Duria antiquior (A more ancient Dorset) by Henry De la Beche, c. 1830. The first published reconstruction of a past environment, based on the Lower Jurassic rocks and fossils of the Dorset and East Devon Coast. © Dorset County Council 2000 In April 1999 the Government announced that the Dorset and East Devon Coast would be one of the twenty-five cultural and natural sites to be included on the United Kingdom’s new Tentative List of sites for future nomination for World Heritage status. Eighteen sites from the United Kingdom and its Overseas Territories have already been inscribed on the World Heritage List, although only two other natural sites within the UK, St Kilda and the Giant’s Causeway, have been granted this status to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Case Study 25
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Brief Description of item(s) 294 manuscript notebooks of the geologist Sir Charles Lyell (1797-1875). In two series: 263 numbered notebooks, 1825-1874, on geology, natural history, social and political subjects; 31 additional notebooks, 1818-1871, with indices. Mostly octavo format. For details see Appendix 1. In good condition. 2. Context The nineteenth century saw public debate about how to conduct science reach new heights. Charles Lyell was a pivotal figure in the establishment of geology as a scientific discipline; he also transformed ideas about the relationship between human history and the history of the earth. Above all, he revealed the significance of ‘deep time’. At a time when the Anglican church dominated intellectual culture, geology was a controversial subject. Lyell played a significant part in separating the practice of science from that of religion. Through his major work, The Principles of Geology, he developed the method later adopted by Darwin for his studies into evolution. Lyell observed natural phenomena at first hand to infer their underlying causes, which he used to interpret the phenomena of the past. The method stressed not only a vast geological timescale, but also the ability of small changes to produce, eventually, large ones. The Principles combined natural history, theology, political economy, anthropology, travel, and geography. It was an immediate success, in Britain, Europe, North America and Australia. Scientists, theologians, leading authors, explorers, artists, and an increasingly educated public read and discussed it. Lyell’s inductive method strongly influenced the generation of naturalists after Darwin. Over the rest of his life, Lyell revised the Principles in the light of new research and his own changing ideas.
    [Show full text]