DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX P. Bridge Arbor Trail Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDIX P. Bridge Arbor Trail Project KRT MASTER PLAN APPENDICES APPENDIX P. Bridge Arbor Trail Project BRIDGE ARBOR TRAIL PROJECT | P-1 KRT MASTER PLAN APPENDICES This page intentionally left blank. P-2 | BRIDGE ARBOR TRAIL PROJECT T S T N S O AVE I FIRST ST T N I G B N I RICE ST A ODY L H L N S ( S E A Seely's M W Middle Creek ( Farm Stand !( MENDENHALL MAIN ST GOVERNMENT ST ( TS20 connection across !( Highway 20 to Upper Clover Creek Main St. H Lake Park photo A T R O N R facing northeast O B LEGEND R A TRAIL ALIGNMENTS E G D UPPER LAKE I ! Alternative 1 ! ! R ! ! ! B Alternative 2 Phase 2, Alternative 1 SYMBOLS D Geographic Feature !( Point of Interest - PRIVATE !( Point of Interest - PUBLIC Community Growth Boundaries OWNERSHIP Federal/State/City Owned Land photo B County Owned Land Utilities & HOA Common Areas facing south ROADS Paved Roads Unpaved Roads Unimproved Roads !! !! Unclassified Roads [ Feet 0375 750 1,500 Scotts Creek Middle Creek bridge detail map ( photo A >> photo C <<photo D ( existing bridge ( proposed bridge facing east foundations ( location 1360' 1400' <<photo B Middle Creek Bridge Arbor Rd. is photo C >> existing paved/gravel roadway to be used as potential future connection to 1360' 1360' Rodman Slough Park through trail 1400' Middle Creek Reclaimation Area photo D facing northwest failed bridge to be replaced/repaired 1400' Upper Lake 1440' ! 1400 MAP AREA 1400' ' ( Nice ! B 1440' R Lucerne IDGE ARBOR ! Lakeport Clearlake ! RD Oaks S29 E ! T R O B I N SO N R INGBIRD LN MO ANCHERIA RD Kelseyville K CK ! C IN Clearlake O G ! M B IR D L N 1 4 1 0 3 0 6 ' [ 0' Z ! E N O R D BRIDGE ARBOR TRAIL proposed project overview LEGEND existing existing levees TRAIL ALIGNMENTS levees/roads Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Scotts Creek /roads Phase 2, Alternative 1 Community Growth Boundaries OWNERSHIP Federal/State/City Owned Land County Owned Land Middle Creek Utilities & HOA Common Areas ( ROADS existing bridge Paved Roads Unpaved Roads foundations Unimproved Roads !! ! ! Unclassified Roads ( ( property owned by proposed CA Fish and Game bridge location potential future connection to Rodman Slough Park through Middle Creek Reclaimation Area BRIDG E ARBO R RD ( Upper Lake [ ! 1360' MAP AREA Feet 1400' 015030075 Nice ! [ CLEAR LAKE Typical Trail Section (proposed - 9/2010 by: DPW) Bridge Section View (proposed - 9/2010 by: DPW) Bridge Plan View (proposed - 9/2010 by: DPW) Bridge Elevation View (proposed - 9/2010 by: DPW) BRIDGE ARBOR TRAIL proposed Middle Creek bridge details KRT MASTER PLAN APPENDICES APPENDIX Q. Large Scale 11 x 17 Maps LARGE SCALE 11 X 17 MAPS | Q-1 KRT MASTER PLAN APPENDICES This page intentionally left blank. Q-2 | LARGE SCALE 11 X 17 MAPS LAKE COUNTY Clear Lake & Konocti Regional Trail Horse Mountain 4692’ # C10-D Penny Pines MENDOCINO NATIONAL FOREST C9-D Deer Valley ÆQ B-C6 Middle Creek Campground !( Sylvan M Springs ? No i ÆQ r d C14 Dry th d F or l Oak Camp k e C ac C he r C e r e ee k k Red Rock 4291’ # Goat Sly Rock Rock ÆQ? C13 Wilson E lk M Camp o u n ta in !( Prospect Trailhead Windy Point Wiley 4767’ B-A25 # Glade Rancheria Blue Rd (Kayak) Bartlett A-D19 BARTLETT Mountain SPRINGS Lakes 4478’ Upper # COMMUNITY C lo Lake v Ba ! e rtl 20 r ett UV C C Old BLM r r e ee Trailhead e k k Ba rtl Barlett ett Sp Indian valley rin Springs gs North trail - A-D2 Pinnacle BLOODY Pine Proposed Access B-A26 Bloody Rock B-C4 !( X ISLAND 4531’ Mountain ÆQB-C1 Island # 4242’ C-A2 A-D12 SAWMILL FLAT ÆQ # ? A-D11 Upper North C-C4 ? PINNACLE Fork Cache C-A5 I ROCK Creek n Cold Spring C-25U Goat Rock camping d Mountain ? i UV29 "G Hot a A-D22 NORTH B-A3 Glen AR-11 Springs n INDIAN COW MOUNTAIN Eden Tr (! V RECREATION AREA Nice a AR-1 ! (! l BLM D33 Rodman Ranch (! (! VALLEY G l " (! (! G ÆQ e AR-12 "G" ? Indian ÆQB1 Cold Spring Mountain Drift Inn y A-D1 s Valley C-A4 g COW Trailer n R WILDERNESS RODMAN D38 Tulipri Hill Reservoir A-D24 Sp SLOUGH Resort D37 Ceago Bartlett Evan e GOAT !( Peak s MOUNTAIN ROCK Long Valley to e AREA r Mendocino NF - v Proposed Access o ÆQ i "G Northport r AR-9 ÆQ Trailer B-C5 Resort Lakeview !( Campground ÆQ C-C1 Ebbins Creek A1 Wintun Lucerne -Proposed ! Campground Access W y o e l A-D32 l l f a ÆQ C V LUCERNE r C12 Kowlaski S s e c t r e t o o HOTEL e Campground C-C3 Eaton o h C-A1 k t c s t S e s k Springs a C L ÆQ Mine X r e C15 Indian e Clyde k Valley Dam B-A2 Campground Mine Crystal Walker Ridge ÆQ Trail general - Lake A02 Blue Oak Proposed Access reek !( ? Long Valley C Campground C-A8 Clear Lake Eagle Rock A-D23 SOUTH COW Pine - Camping Signal Rock Formation (! MOUNTAIN AREA Mountain B-A16 High Formation 2529’ ÆQ (! Valley Rd k # C16 Canyon Creek C-11 D Buckhorn e e Campground r (! ? C ÆQB-C2 Lakeport(! - Camping ! s (! t t B-A11 Cow o (! c S Mtn OHV k Staging Area r o ? C-A9 Kontayee/Capt Floyd D77 D34 Brassfield F GAR-10 Th h " t G e D35 Montelago u " N (! D39 Shannon Ridge o A-D8 LAKESIDE S a Konocti Vista Casino r (! Resort & RV Park COUNTY PARK ro Lake Place Clearlake A-D10 CLEAR w Resort UV20 D40 High Valley ÆQ LAKE STATE PARK Buckingham Pt s ÆQ 20 Oaks Oaks and RV ! B-C7 clear Oasis Bar GAR-8 ? Court N " HITCH SITES ÆQ Island lake oaks o &Grill B-A1 SodaBay A-D9 CLEAR ÆQ r A-D21 Park RV campground !( th Restaurant X Mission LAKE STATE PARK Anderson ÆQ B-A31 clear F ÆQ ? A-D31 ANDERSON ISLAND RATTLESNAKE o k Glenhaven Is. lake oaks r e Rancheria B-A12 Clear Lake INDIAN VILLAGE SITE ISLAND ÆQ k e Highway r Beach !( B-A28 Clark Peak Tr C county park C 20 Access State Park ÆQ !( a Campground M&M Campground y c l (general) h CLEAR z Rattlesnake e z A05 Clear Lake A-D7 SODA B-A27 North i Is. C r LAKE State Park BAY BATHS Ridge Tr C35 Pine Dell r G ÆQ !( e - Camping e PG&E Access Edgewater A-D20 k SP B-A22 Black Forest Road entrance B Resort and SULPHUR BANK ig (2of2) s V a RV Park GAR-2 MERCURY MINE g " lle S ank n ulphur B i y r A-D4 y p d S 175 d BUCKINGHAM UV d a !( B CACHE n ? G o AR-15 a C-A7 PEAK l B-A29 rax h B-A20 Red g G i A-D3 East Tr "L H Kelseyville ak Bud Trail CREEK ! C-A6 to Buckingham Peak CLARK A-D6 ANCIENT Mount e ? (! Head Bell Hill PEAK MAUL OAKS Konocti Monitor Lak # D66 Ladybug Habitat esh Mary Downen Cabin D59 4285’ Is. (! or WILDERNESS "G e A-D18 Ca k D68 Howard Peak c e !( A-D5 Konocti WILSON h e B-A13 Konocti e r WRIGHT Bay AREA VALLEY C C Rd (Proposed) Perkins e PEAK (! Wilson r e b Creek Valley e o k e k d Ridge re Wilderness A C e Clearlake Perkins Creek Ridge - h B-A5 Small B-A4 Dam ! c Proposed Access a Boat Launch HighlandParking !( C AR-7 Springs 281 B-A21 Perkins G UV Point " Lake 53 Creek Ridge TH Resr. v (! UV B-A8 Adobe Creek TH iew A-D28 HIGHLAND SPRINGS A-D26 NORTH B-A6 Boat B-A9 East RECREATION AREA A-D27 INDIAN ISLAND SECTOR DAY Launch Park Highland 29 UV B-A15 Proposed USE AREA B-A7 Horse Springs !( B-A10 Horse Trail Easement Staging T B-C3 Trailer Parking hu ÆQG !( B-A30 Eli rs " ton AR-6 Stage Stop La AR-5 "G Lake County Workshop Points ke HIGHLAND SPRINGS !( "G B-A17 Chaparral AR-4 Morgan Valley / Proposed G A-D17 "G ACCESS POINT " AR-14 Rocky Creek - CACHE CREEK WILDERNES Access Pt Proposed Access!( A-D15 CACHE AREA B S o e !( A-D25 CREEK DAM ÆQ CAMPING t ig ANDERSON t l le Brushy Sky e r B-A18 Dawson ANDERSON S R p o High Peak r (Proposed) ! c in MA RSH SHPRANCH DESTINATION k g s ÆQ PRIVATE or PROPOSED CAMPING !( A-D29 PROPOSED ACCESS POINT BOGGS LAKE PRESERVE ÆQ PROPOSED CAMPING B-A14 Boggs A-D14 Boggs "G"G BOGGS G MAHNKE Preserve Lake " RESOURCE SENSITIVE AREA n nyo ek CABIN AR-13 LAKE Ca re r C Mo le ey A-D16 MORGAN B-A23 rgan ig ps Valley PRESERVE e o S C VALLEY Cellphone Trail PARCEL Pullout H a McLaughlin r Potential Trail Corridor r i A-D13 n Reserve g nd t o o Loch Lom North MAHNKE n F PEAK l a Protected Areas t US Forest Service C18-D Ridge Camp & C17-D Calso Camp Hobergs US Fish and Wildlife Service ! Yogi Bear’s Boggs Mountain Jellystone State Forest US Bureau of Land Management ! ÆQ ÆQPark A-D30 Other Federal Paradise Valley BOGGS - Proposed FOREST Camping CA Dept of Parks & Recreation BOGGS MTN !( CA Dept of Fish & Game DEMONSTRATION Other State ? Cobb STATE FOREST 29 Mountain UV City or County 4724’ # Hidden Valley Non Governmental Organization Campground Special District ÆQ Co yo te C r e e eek k Cr River ria D ca u I t c P h u uta e ta P h C r h r C Cr D76 Harbin Hot Springs e r eek e e e B k k ig C 5 a §¨¦ n y o UV175 n §¨¦101 Santa Rosa Sacramento D55 Mt.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Horseback Riding, Bird Watching, Primitive Camping, Commercial And
    United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Ukiah Field Office 2550 N. State Street Ukiah, CA 95482 www.ca.blm.gov/ukiah Dear Reader, Enclosed is the Final Cache Creek Coordinated Resource Management Plan (CRMP). This plan provides the framework for the future management direction of BLM lands included within the Cache Creek Natural Area. Additional cooperators with this plan include the California Department of Fish and Game, which manages the Cache Creek Wildlife Area, and Yolo County Parks and Resources Management which manages Cache Creek Canyon Regional Park. The Draft CRMP was released in September 2002, and considered several alternatives with varying degrees of habitat development/resource protection and primitive recreation development. Based on public input to this draft at public meetings and from written responses, emails, faxes, and phone messages a Proposed Action was developed that best prioritized the protection of resource values while allowing a compatible level of primitive recreational use. Each of the projects proposed in this CRMP will be evaluated in an Environmental Assessment that will present several alternatives and discuss the environmental impacts of each alternative. I thank everyone who commented on the Draft and provided helpful suggestions in developing this CRMP. Sincerely. Rich Burns Ukiah Field Office Manager U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Cache Creek Coordinated Resource Management Plan/ Environmental Assessment Final Prepared by: Ukiah Field Office
    [Show full text]
  • Lake County Water Inventory and Analysis Final
    In Cooperation with the California Department of Water Resources, Northern District Lake County Water Inventory and Analysis Final March 2006 Lake County Watershed Protection District Lake County Water Inventory and Analysis March 2006 Final Contents Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Lake County Watershed Protection District.........................................................1-1 1.2 Inventory and Analysis Purpose............................................................................1-2 1.3 Inventory Unit Development..................................................................................1-2 1.4 Document Contents..................................................................................................1-3 Section 2 Physical Setting 2.1 Topography ...............................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Climate .......................................................................................................................2-2 2.2.1 Temperature...............................................................................................2-2 2.2.2 Precipitation ...............................................................................................2-3 2.3 Surface Water Hydrology........................................................................................2-5 2.3.1 Surface Water Flows and Variability......................................................2-5 2.4 Soils...........................................................................................................................2-11
    [Show full text]
  • Springs of California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIBECTOB WATER- SUPPLY PAPER 338 SPRINGS OF CALIFORNIA BY GEKALD A. WARING WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1915 CONTENTS. Page. lntroduction by W. C. Mendenhall ... .. ................................... 5 Physical features of California ...... ....... .. .. ... .. ....... .............. 7 Natural divisions ................... ... .. ........................... 7 Coast Ranges ..................................... ....•.......... _._._ 7 11 ~~:~~::!:: :~~e:_-_-_·.-.·.·: ~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::: ::: 12 Sierra Nevada .................... .................................... 12 Southeastern desert ......................... ............. .. ..... ... 13 Faults ..... ....... ... ................ ·.. : ..... ................ ..... 14 Natural waters ................................ _.......................... 15 Use of terms "mineral water" and ''pure water" ............... : .·...... 15 ,,uneral analysis of water ................................ .. ... ........ 15 Source and amount of substances in water ................. ............. 17 Degree of concentration of natural waters ........................ ..· .... 21 Properties of mineral waters . ................... ...... _. _.. .. _... _....• 22 Temperature of natural waters ... : ....................... _.. _..... .... : . 24 Classification of mineral waters ............ .......... .. .. _. .. _......... _ 25 Therapeutic value of waters .................................... ... ... 26 Analyses
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies to Control Mercury Pollution in the Cache Creek Basin, Northern California
    STRATEGIES TO CONTROL MERCURY POLLUTION IN THE CACHE CREEK BASIN, NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 2011 Group Project Prepared by: Melissa Riley, Amibeth Sheridan, Bethany Taylor, Kristiana Teige, Toshiyuki Yamasaki, and Nick Zigler Faculty Advisor: Arturo A. Keller, Ph.D. Client: U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management – California State Office Strategies to Control Mercury Pollution in the Cache Creek Basin, Northern California As authors of this Group Project report, we are proud to archive this report on the Bren School’s website such that the results of our research are available for all to read. Our signatures on the document signify our joint responsibility to fulfill the archiving standards set by the Bren School of Environmental Science & Management. _________________________________ _________________________________ Melissa Riley Amibeth Sheridan _________________________________ _________________________________ Bethany Taylor Kristiana Teige _________________________________ _________________________________ Toshiyuki Yamasaki Nick Zigler The mission of the Bren School of Environmental Science & Management is to produce professionals with unrivaled training in environmental science and management who will devote their unique skills to the diagnosis, assessment, mitigation, prevention, and remedy of the environmental problems of today and the future. A guiding principle of the School is that the analysis of environmental problems requires quantitative training in more than one discipline and an awareness of the physical, biological, social, political, and economic consequences that arise from scientific or technological decisions. The Group Project is required of all students in the Master’s of Environmental Science and Management (MESM) Program. It is a three-quarter activity in which small groups of students conduct focused, interdisciplinary research on the scientific, management, and policy dimensions of a specific environmental issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Highlights This Year’S New Projects
    Keeping Wilderness Wild Private inholdings are a threat to the globally unique, 109 million acre preservation system that millions of people have spent 50 years creating. Nearly 180,000 acres of private lands in 2,883 parcels remain within Congressionally designated Wilderness Areas in the lower 48 states. Each landowner has the right to develop their property as they see fit. How do we determine which properties to acquire? The Trust developed what is now a nationally recognized method for prioritizing the acquisition of wilderness inholdings with Colorado State University in the early 1990’s. Go to most Forest Service and BLM offices and ask for information on their wilderness inholdings—you’ll likely get one of our statewide reports. The prioritization method measures three major components for determining the highest priority properties to acquire: 1. Its development potential; 2. The property’s ecological importance to the surrounding wilderness; and 3. The recreational and management impact of the property on the surrounding wilderness. We look at and score 17 unique factors. Lands with road access that fragment threatened and endangered species habitat crossed by a trail go right to the top. We then tenaciously contact landowners, partnering with federal agencies and local wilderness advocacy groups to identify good projects from willing sellers. How is the Trust funded? We implement our land acquisition program through the development of two funds. Each is supported by donors and private foundations who believe that securing our National Wilderness Preservation System is of the utmost importance—and know that the Trust proves its ability to add land to wilderness each and every year.
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Ninth Congress of the United States of America
    H. R. 233 One Hundred Ninth Congress of the United States of America AT THE SECOND SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, the third day of January, two thousand and six An Act To designate certain National Forest System lands in the Mendocino and Six Rivers National Forests and certain Bureau of Land Management lands in Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, and Napa Counties in the State of California as wilderness, to designate the Elkhorn Ridge Potential Wilderness Area, to designate certain segments of the Black Butte River in Mendocino County, California as a wild or scenic river, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Northern California Coastal Wild Heritage Wilderness Act’’. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title and table of contents. Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary. Sec. 3. Designation of wilderness areas. Sec. 4. Administration of wilderness areas. Sec. 5. Release of wilderness study areas. Sec. 6. Elkhorn Ridge Potential Wilderness Area. Sec. 7. Wild and scenic river designation. Sec. 8. King Range National Conservation Area boundary adjustment. Sec. 9. Cow Mountain Recreation Area, Lake and Mendocino Counties, California. Sec. 10. Continuation of traditional commercial surf fishing, Redwood National and State Parks. SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY. In this Act, the term ‘‘Secretary’’ means— (1) with respect to land under the jurisdiction of the Sec- retary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Agriculture; and (2) with respect to land under the jurisdiction of the Sec- retary of the Interior, the Secretary of the Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Protection Areas
    Thorn Junction Benbow Knob, The 6486 ' EEL Panther Peak R, S FK Windy Mountain Shasta-Trinity 1862 ' 7081 ' Thorn E Vinegar Peak Schofield Peak Six Rivers E L 6549 ' 1992 ' R FK , Little Butte , M M N R Booth Knoll EEL A F B K 5632 ' E T 2427 ' A T Shelter Cove R O C L HUMBOLDT R E Walker Butte K Hopkins Peak , E S R K F 2404 ' A 6749 ' K Reed Mountain W Round Mountain E Sugarloaf Mountain Chamisal Mountain Whitethorn Beall Place 3101 ' R A E L Pilot Peak K 5000 ' L 7367 ' Harvey Peak E A Big Butte R 2598 ' E C Brush Mountain , 4092 ' R 5922 ' M 7361 ' 4200 ' F Island Mountain K D CR Linn, Mount Linn Mount Lake Mountain , N EA IL Moose Peak F F G 8092 ' 2467 ' 3851 ' K O TRINITY 1787 ' LM Oven Lid BA South Yolla Bolly South Yolla Bolly Mountains 6662 ' E Island Mountain L Solomon Peak 2460 ' D 3286 ' 8092 ' E Cooks Valley 7581 ' R C Horse Ranch Peak R, N Twin Peaks FK K 4156 ' F Nielson Place S 7403 ' , R EEL R, L N FK E E Hammerhorn Mountain 7563 ' Noble Butte Andersonia 2435 ' EE L R, Little Butte S FK, E Wildhorse Peak BR 1800 ' R 3564 ' C Piercy Table Rock IS H R F AN C Ramsey 3360 ' DI Island Mountain Delmonico Place IN 3847 ' Bald Mountain Bell Springs Mountain 3938 ' 3861 ' Mina EE L R, M FK Bell Springs R Ball Rock C S Griffin Place 6663 ' Camel Rock E Castle Peak M 3837 ' O 6216 ' Steuben Place High Tip E H E T L R 372 ' , S Mitchell Place F R K L Cold Springs Workcenter Kenny E E Red Rock 6050 ' TEHAMA Red Mountain Little Baldy Beaver Glade Fire Station 4095 ' 3646 ' Pratt Place Buck Mountain Leech Lake Mountain Ball Mountain
    [Show full text]
  • Sonoma-Lake-Napa Unit 2020 Strategic Fire Plan
    Figure: 1 Capell Incident Sonoma-Lake-Napa Unit 2020 Strategic Fire Plan Unit Strategic Fire Plan Amendments Description of Updated Date Section Updated Page Numbers Updated Update By 5/26/2020 ALL ALL Annual Update S.Cardwell 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNATURE PAGE ........................................................................................................ 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 5 SECTION I: UNIT OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 6 SECTION II: UNIT PREPAREDNESS AND FIREFIGHTING CAPABILITIES ............... 9 SECTION III: VALUES .................................................................................................. 12 History of Large Fires ................................................................................................. 12 Values at Risk ............................................................................................................ 12 Section IV: PRE-FIRE MANAGEMENT STRATAGIES & TACTICS ........................... 13 Communication and Collaboration ............................................................................. 13 Pre-Fire Planning ....................................................................................................... 14 Section V: MONITORING PROGRAMS EFFECTIVNESS .......................................... 16 Emergency Command Center ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Scotts Creek Watershed Assessment
    Scotts Creek Watershed Assessment A Document of the Scotts Creek Watershed Council Prepared for: West Lake and East Lake Resource Conservation Districts 889 Lakeport Blvd Lakeport, CA 95453 (707) 263-4180 Funded by Proposition 50 through the CALFED Watershed Program Administered by the California Department of Water Resources Prepared by: County of Lake Department of Public Works Water Resources Division 255 North Forbes Street Lakeport, CA 95453 Tel. 707-263-2341 and West Lake and East Lake Resource Conservation Districts 889 Lakeport Blvd. Lakeport, California 95453 Tel. 707-263-4180 February 2010 Acknowledgements Author Erica Lundquist, Lake County Water Resources Division Plates by Greg Dills, West Lake and East Lake Resource Conservation Districts Glossary by Alisa Carlson, Scotts Creek Watershed Council Project Partners Lake County Division of Water Resources Natural Resources Conservation Service Bureau of Land Management Upper Lake Habematolel Pomo Indians Robinson Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians Big Valley Watershed Council Middle Creek Coordinated Resource Management and Planning Group Scotts Creek Watershed Council Technical Advisors and Reviewers Frank Arriaza, Bureau of Land Management Ukiah Office Pardee Bardwell, Bureau of Land Management Ukiah Office Voris Brumfield, Lake County Code Enforcement Division Mark Brannigan, City of Lakeport Richard Burns, Bureau of Land Management Ukiah Office Alisa Carlson, Scotts Creek Watershed Council Caroline Chavez, Lake County Public Services Department Kim Clymire, Lake County Public
    [Show full text]
  • A Trail Through Time: Hopland to Lakeport on an "Old Indian Trail"
    A Trail through Time: Hopland to Lakeport on an "Old Indian Trail" by Mary Gerbic A thesis submitted to Sonoma State University in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in Cultural Resources Management Margaret Purser, Ph.D., Chair Department of Anthropology Matthew Clark, Ph.D. Department ofGeography and Global Studies Donna Gillette, M.A. Date Copyright 2011 by Mary A. Gerbic ii AUTHORIZATION FOR REPRODUCTION OF MASTERS THESIS/PROJECT I grant permission for the reproduction ofthis thesis in its entirety, without further authorization from me, on the condition that the person or agency requesting reproduction absorb the cost and provide proper acknowledgement of authorship. Date: Signature III A Trail through Time: Hopland to Lakeport on an "Old Indian Trail" Thesis by Mary Gerbic Abstract Purpose ofthe Study: The purpose ofthis study is to generate a context for describing the use and reuse of a trail through the Mayacmas Mountains, historically described as the "Trail between Hopland and Lakeport", and also having its origins as an "Indian Trail". This study area for this project is the Hopland Research and Extension Center (HREC), because the trail is thought to pass through the HREC property. The study ofthis trail also has the potential to contribute to ongoing regional archaeological studies in the southern North Coast Ranges and highlight areas of potential interest for future research. Methods: The study used archaeological, ethnographic, historic, geographic data and local knowledge to identify the route ofthis trail. Sections of the hypothesized route were surveyed, mapped within a GIS, and evaluated using ANOVA and T -Test to determine if there was statistical probability ofa relationship between the trail segments and a set of archaeological sites, as compared to a set of randomly generated points.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake County CEDS 2014
    COUNTY OF LAKE COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY PREPARED BY: COUNTY OF LAKE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE ADOPTED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: NOVEMBER 5, 2013 APPROVED BY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION: MARCH 7, 2014 Lake County Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy - 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................2 SECTION ONE: ANALYSIS...............................................................................................3 I. BACKGROUND: THE AREA AND ITS ECONOMY...........................................................3 A. General Description of the Area ..................................................................................................... 3 B. Economy........................................................................................................................................... 4 C. Natural Resources............................................................................................................................ 9 D. Environmental Issues .................................................................................................................... 12 E. Political Geography....................................................................................................................... 17 F. Employment in Lake County........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]