DOCSLIB.ORG

A Study of the Text, Language and Imagery of Vergil's Aeneid9 176-502

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Durham E-Theses A study of the text, language and imagery of Vergil's Aeneid9 176-502 Donaldson, Sarah Jane How to cite: Donaldson, Sarah Jane (1992) A study of the text, language and imagery of Vergil's Aeneid9 176-502, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/6010/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My thanks are due to my supervisors, Professor A.J. Woodman and Dr J.L. Moles, for their encouragement, their patience and all their invaluable advice. A STUDY OF THE TEXT, LANGUAGE AND IMAGERY OF VERGIL'S A £"A^£/Z) 9.176-502 BY SARAH JANE DONALDSON Submitted for the qualification of M. Litt 1992 ABSTRACT Tills tiiesis consists of a Commentary on Vergil's Aeneid 9. 176-502, using the OCT, edited by R.A.B. Mynors (Oxford, 1972 reprint). It is made up of two parts: Introduction and Commentary. The Introduction comprises sections on tlie characters of Nisus and Euryalus (as they appear in the text and the literary precedents that influenced their depiction); the relationship between them and its ramifications; their position in the Aeneid; tlieir 'type' in the Classical Tradition (with particular attention to their characterisation as warriors); the response of a Roman audience to them and what Vergil's own perception of them might have been in the light of his own supposed homosexuality. The Commentary is divided into five Sections: 1: 176-313 — Plarming and preparation 2: 314-366 — The'^Apicrceiai of Nisus and Euryalus 3: 367^49 — The deaths of Nisus and Euryalus 4: 450472 —Interlude 5: 473-503 — Epilogue: the lament of Euryalus's mother. Each section consists of a brief introduction and commentary on the text contained in it. As a whole, the Commentary deals with textual criticism, the text's relation to the rest of the Aeneid and the works of other Classical authors and the significance of these allusions (with particular attention paid to tlie close parallels witli tlie Homeric Doloneia: Iliad 10). It also deals with the underlying imagery of the homoerotic, elegiac and Platonic ethos of what is essentially an epic and martial setting, and of tlie influence of divine and external forces on the action of the characters. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. A STUDY OF THE TEXT, LANGUAGE AND IMAGERY OF VERGIL'S AENEID 9.176-502 BY SARAH JANE DONALDSON Submitted for the qualification of M. Litt. to the University of Durham, Department of Classics Year of submission: 1992 DEC 1992 Declaration of authorship The material of this thesis is solely the work of the author and none of it has previously been submitted for a degree in this or any other University or institution Statement of copyright The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without her prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. ui LIST OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION — THE CHARACTERS 1 Nisus 1 Euryalus 9 The relationship between Nisus and Euryalus 13 Their position in the Aeneid 22 Their'type'in the Classical Tradition: 27 (a) Nisus as a warrior 27 (b) Euryalus as a warrior 31 A Roman perspective 34 Vergil's perception of Nisus and Euryalus 38 COMMENTARY 42 Section 1: (176-313) Planning and preparation 42 Introduction 42 Commentary 45 Section 2: (314-366) The 'Apioxeiai of Nisus and Euryalus 144 Introduction 144 Commentary 148 Section 3: (367-449) The deaths of Nisus and Euryalus 195 Introduction 195 Commentary 197 Section 4: (450-472) Interlude 265 Introduction 265 Commentary 266 Section 5: (473-503) Epilogue — the lament of Euryalus's mother 281 Introduction 281 Commentary 284 BIBLIOGRAPHY 303 INTRODUCTION — THE CHARACTERS The narrative of Aeneid 9. 176-502 concerns the fortunes of two young waniors, Nisus and Euryalus, their opioxeuxi and deaths. This introduction examines the characters from several aspects: each one as a separate character, their relationship with one another, the part they play in the Aeneid, their 'type' in the classical tradition and what expectation this would raise in Vergil's audience, and what Vergil's attitude might have been to them (on the basis of his description of, and comments on, them in the text). This last topic is particularly hazardous. There is considerable risk of confusing the poetic persona with the real poet (if indeed the latter can be extrapolated from the text at all). Great caution must also be exercised before accepting in full the details in the later Lives of Vergil, most of which were written some considerable time after his death, by which time an extensive legend would have grovm up around so famous a poet. These details particulariy concem Vergil's possible homosexuality, as inferred by Donatus from Eclogue 2, and the question of how this aspect of Vergil's character might affect his framing of his literary characters. NISUS We must envisage Nisus as being somewhere between the age of eighteen and his early twenties if the standard Greek scenario set forth by K.J. Dover can be taken to apply in this case (Dover, 1978, p. 171): ... in general the pursuit of eromenoi was characteristic of the years before marriage. The relationship between the two men seems to have this kind of flavour, an impression reinforced by the Platonic allusions (see Makowski, 1989 passim). There is a set group of standard elements to such a friendship, such as the ip(ii\izvoq being in die flower of his youth, and the epacrrnq being older and more experienced, and these are all referred to within the first eight lines of the episode (176-183). Nisus, the epoccrrnq, has already gained a reputation for his skill and prowess (176 acerrimus armis). He is cleariy older tiian Euryalus, to whom he says (272) tm vita dignior aetas, but still young enough to feel that he must justify his youth to the council of Trojan warriors (235 neve haec nostris spectentur ab annisi quaeferimus). Vergil does not give any physical description of him, but this is typical, or at least very characteristic. He will paint a character by allusion in such a way that a picture is built up in the imagination of the reader without any defmite physical detail being given. Vergil does, however, give a clear psychological portrayal: Nisus is, first and foremost, warlike by nature (176 acerrimus armis). While being besieged, his strongest desire is to do something to relieve the tedium as he cannot bear to be still and passive. Doing sentry-duty is not enough for him, as he himself states (186): outpugnam aut aliquid iamdudum invadere magnum mens agitat mihi, nec placida contenta quiete est. However, despite his essendally dynamic character, he is neither unreasoning nor imprudent. He may wish to expose himself to great danger, but he is initially unwiUing to allow Euryalus to accompany him. This unwillingness arises both from the practical reasoning that he would like someone to avenge him and to ransom his body should he fail, and from the 'moral' reasoning that he is unwiUing to cause grief to Euryalus's mother should anything happen to Euryalus (211-218). He also calls a halt to the slaughter as he feels that they are losing sight of their goal (354-355). Nisus is also capable of rational speculation on the nature of the gods and their influence on men. However, it is this speculation that causes him to overreach himself and indulge the thought of his independence of the gods (185 an sua cuique deus fit dira cupido), thus in effect provoking divine ^Qovoq as can be seen from his ultimate fate (see also Dodds, 1951, esp. pp. 29ff). There is even a hint of daemonic manipulation behind his uttering of these words because, although his thoughts are not, of themselves, impious, he is simply not aware of the inherent danger of seeking freedom from the jealous gods and so in his musings he leaves himself vulnerable to external influences (see Commentary 185 for the implications of dira cupido). As soon as the cupido which leads to the formulation of his plan is identified as dira, it casts a shadow over the subsequent story: this 5ua())rm.ux before a dangerous undertaking courts disaster. This is what makes the denouement of the episode so poignant: throughout there is an uneasy feeling that all will not be well. As J. P. Vemant and P. Vidal-Naquet express it (p. 27): The particular domain of tragedy lies in (the)... border zone where human actions hinge on divine powers and where their true meaning, unsuspected by even those who initiated them and take responsibility for them, is only revealed when it becomes a part of an order that is beyond man and escapes him.
Recommended publications
  • Vergil's Nisus and the Language of Self-Sacrifice In

    Vergil's Nisus and the Language of Self-Sacrifice In

    Vergil’s Nisus and the Language of Self-Sacrifice in Paradise Lost LEAH WHITTINGTON Princeton University When the Son of God offers to die for mankind in book 3 of Paradise Lost (1667), readers who have been tempted to join the devil’s party for the first two books of the poem confront an unsettling dramatic scene: the assembly in heaven is staged as a mirror image of the demonic council at Pandemonium. The listening host suddenly grows quiet, and a solitary hero figure emerges out of the silence to take on the burden of raising the collective fortune. Placed beside the Son’s promise to atone for man’s sin with his death, Satan’s exploratory mission to earth comes into focus as a fallen reflection of self-sacrifice, a self-aggrandiz- ing perversion of the poem’s heroic ideal now articulated in the Son. This moment of internal self-reference has often been identified as part of Milton’s didactic strategy to confront the reader with proof of his own fallenness,1 but it is less often recognized that the Son’s speech to the angelic host makes use of an allusion that gives it a central place in the story of Milton’s engagement with classical epic.2 When the Son 1. See Stanley Fish, Surprised by Sin (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971). Fish famously argues that the heroic portrayal of Satan is part of a larger narrative strategy by which Milton provokes the reader ‘‘with evidence of his corruption’’ and forces him ‘‘to refine his perceptions so that his understanding will be once more proportionable to truth’’ (xiii).
  • Senecan Tragedy and Virgil's Aeneid: Repetition and Reversal

    Senecan Tragedy and Virgil's Aeneid: Repetition and Reversal

    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 Senecan Tragedy and Virgil's Aeneid: Repetition and Reversal Timothy Hanford Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/427 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] SENECAN TRAGEDY AND VIRGIL’S AENEID: REPETITION AND REVERSAL by TIMOTHY HANFORD A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Classics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2014 ©2014 TIMOTHY HANFORD All Rights Reserved ii This dissertation has been read and accepted by the Graduate Faculty in Classics in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Ronnie Ancona ________________ _______________________________ Date Chair of Examining Committee Dee L. Clayman ________________ _______________________________ Date Executive Officer James Ker Joel Lidov Craig Williams Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract SENECAN TRAGEDY AND VIRGIL’S AENEID: REPETITION AND REVERSAL by Timothy Hanford Advisor: Professor Ronnie Ancona This dissertation explores the relationship between Senecan tragedy and Virgil’s Aeneid, both on close linguistic as well as larger thematic levels. Senecan tragic characters and choruses often echo the language of Virgil’s epic in provocative ways; these constitute a contrastive reworking of the original Virgilian contents and context, one that has not to date been fully considered by scholars.
  • AENEID UNABRIDGED VIRGIL Read by David Collins

    AENEID UNABRIDGED VIRGIL Read by David Collins

    ––––THE–––– POETRY AENEID UNABRIDGED VIRGIL Read by David Collins The masterpiece of Rome’s greatest poet, Virgil’s Aeneid has inspired generations of readers and holds a central place in Western literature. The epic tells the story of a group of refugees from the ruined city of Troy, whose attempts to reach a promised land in the West are continually frustrated by the hostile goddess Juno. Finally reaching Italy, their leader Aeneas is forced to fi ght a bitter war against the natives to establish the foundations from which Rome is destined to rise. This magnifi cent poem, in the modern translation by Cecil Day-Lewis, is superbly read by David Collins. David Collins started his audio career by winning the BBC’s coveted Carleton Hobbs Award. Since then he has featured in many BBC Radio 4 plays and documentaries, short stories such as Out of the Burning House by Marina Warner, and poetry on Poetry Total running time: 13:01:31 • 10 CDs Please and Time for Verse. For Naxos AudioBooks he has read The View our catalogue online at Spanish Bride. n-ab.com/cat = Downloads (M4B chapters or MP3 fi les) = CDs (disc–track) 1 1-1 Book I 7:51 28 3-6 Distraught, she witlessly wandered about… 7:47 2 1-2 Even as he cried out thus, a howling gust… 6:49 29 3-7 Whereupon the Trojans redoubled… 8:18 3 1-3 Aeneas, where he stood, snatched up… 6:25 30 3-8 So Dido spoke, and fell silent… 6:50 4 1-4 Here for three hundred years shall rule… 7:45 31 3-9 And now was Aurora, leaving the saffron… 5:09 5 1-5 I am true-hearted Aeneas… 7:32 32 3-10 Then, after eyeing
  • The Wolf in Virgil Lee Fratantuono

    The Wolf in Virgil Lee Fratantuono

    The Wolf in Virgil Lee Fratantuono To cite this version: Lee Fratantuono. The Wolf in Virgil. Revue des études anciennes, Revue des études anciennes, Université Bordeaux Montaigne, 2018, 120 (1), pp.101-120. hal-01944509 HAL Id: hal-01944509 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01944509 Submitted on 23 Sep 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Copyright ISSN 0035-2004 REVUE DES ÉTUDES ANCIENNES TOME 120, 2018 N°1 SOMMAIRE ARTICLES : Milagros NAVARRO CABALLERO, María del Rosario HERNANDO SOBRINO, À l’ombre de Mommsen : retour sur la donation alimentaire de Fabia H[---]la................................................................... 3 Michele BELLOMO, La (pro)dittatura di Quinto Fabio Massimo (217 a.C.): a proposito di alcune ipotesi recenti ................................................................................................................................ 37 Massimo BLASI, La consecratio manquée de L. Cornelius Sulla Felix ......................................... 57 Sophie HULOT, César génocidaire ? Le massacre des
  • CLASSICAL MYTHS Unit 3. the Trojan War

    CLASSICAL MYTHS Unit 3. the Trojan War

    CLASSICAL MYTHS Unit 3. The Trojan War 1. The fragments below belong to the text you are about to read. Work in pairs to decide where they should go. a) the son of Thetis and Peleus b) the king of Troy c) but was destined never to be believed d) sister of Helen e) According to the legend, the son of Ilos was Laomedon, who was regarded as a cheat and a liar f) It was a formidable fleet and army which left the Greek shores to embark on the siege of Troy g) Odysseus decided it was time to use some guile h) a priest of Apollo i) Menelaus, in the other hand, lived happily for many years with Helen j) During the wedding festivities the uninvited Eris, goddess of Discord, threw down a golden apple k) whom Zeus had seduced when he came to her in the disguise of a swan l) The Greeks began sacking the city m) and dragged the body three times round the city wall behind his chariot n) the man the Greeks had left behind THE TROJAN WAR Greek legends tell of a 10-year war between the Greeks and the people of Troy in Asia Minor. Troy was said to have been founded by a man called Teucer who became its first king and under his great-great-grand-son, Ilos, it received the name Ilion _1_ . Apollo and Poseidon built a wall round Troy for him, but Laomedon refused to give them the payment he had promised. In revenge the gods sent a sea monster to ravage Troy but the hero Heracles promised to kill it on the condition that Laomedon gave him his horses.
  • 128 13) It Is to Be Noted That the Theory of These Remarks Is Not Put

    128 13) It Is to Be Noted That the Theory of These Remarks Is Not Put

    128 13) It is to be noted that the theory of these remarks is not put into practice in the Il.: it is taken for granted that Trojans and Greeks communicate with each other without the help of interpreters. The author of the HomericHymn to Aphrodite, indeed, goes one step further, since he makes Aphrodite (who pretends to be a Phrygian princess) say to the Trojan Anchises: (113-6) On this subject see further: J. Werner, NichtgriechischeSprachen imBewusstsein der antikenGriechen, in: P. Händel, W. Meid (ed.), Festschrift für Robert Muth(Innsbruck 1983), 583-95. THE FIRST SONG OF DEMODOCUS The quarrel of Odysseus and Achilles, about which the Phaeacian singer Demodocus sings at the beginning of a feast being held in Odysseus' honour, is neither attested to by any reliable tradition nor easily explicable from the internal standpoint of the epics'). It is thus not surprising that alongside attempts to discover the tradition to which it should be attributed, it has been argued that the subject of Demodocus' first song was simply invented by Homer. In his article on the Odysseyin RE, P. Von der Mfhll assumed that the quarrel of Odysseus and Achilles was an autoschediasma created with the intention of supplying Demodocus with material for his performance2). Though Von der Mfhll later abandoned this theory in favour of the hypothesis that the episode could be traced back to the Cypria3), the view that Demodocus' first song is an "Augenblickserfindung" was revived by W. Marg. According to Marg's theory, the quarrel between Odysseus and Achilles was invented in order to generate an allusion to the proem of the Iliad, to which it bears a striking resemblance4).
  • Lunar References in Virgil's Aeneid

    Lunar References in Virgil's Aeneid

    Graeco-Latina Brunensia 24 / 2019 / 1 https://doi.org/10.5817/GLB2019-1-5 Alma Phoebe: Lunar References in Virgil’s Aeneid Lee M. Fratantuono (Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware) Abstract The moon and lunar phenomena are frequently referenced in Virgil’s Aeneid. Close study of these allusions reveals that the poet employs lunar imagery as a key element in his depiction of the characters of both the Carthaginian Dido and the Volscian Camilla, in particular the de- ČLÁNKY / ARTICLES liberately crafted juxtaposition between the two women. Keywords Virgil; Moon; Luna; Dido; Camilla 61 Lee M. Fratantuono Alma Phoebe: Lunar References in Virgil’s Aeneid The moon serves as astronomical witness to a number of key events in Virgil’s Aeneid.1 The present study will seek to explicate the various references to the moon in the text of the epic (including mentions of the goddess Luna or Phoebe), with a view to illustrating how Virgil employs lunar imagery to significant effect in his poem, in particular in delin- eating the contrast between the opposing pairs Venus/Dido and Diana/Camilla, and as part of his pervasive concern with identifying the relationship between Troy and Rome.2 Near the close of the first book of the epic, the “wandering moon” is cited as the first of the subjects of the song of Dido’s bard Iopas (A. I, 742 hic canit errantem lunam solisque labores).3 The passage echoes similar languages in the song of Silenus from the sixth eclogue (E. VI, 64 tum canit, errantem Permessi ad flumina Gallum),4 where one of the Muses and the divine shepherd Linus rise to give honor to the poet Gallus as he wanders by the Permessus.
  • Homer and Hesiod

    Homer and Hesiod

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (Classical Studies) Classical Studies at Penn 1-1-1997 Homer and Hesiod Ralph M. Rosen University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/classics_papers Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons Recommended Citation Rosen, R. M. (1997). Homer and Hesiod. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/classics_papers/7 Postprint version. Published in A New Companion to Homer, edited by Barry Powell and Ian Morris, Mnemosyne: Bibliotheca classica Batava, Supplementum 163 (New York: Brill, 1997), pages 463-488. The author has asserted his right to include this material in ScholarlyCommons@Penn. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/classics_papers/7 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Homer and Hesiod Abstract One of the most frustrating aspects of Homeric studies is that so little literary material outside the Homeric corpus itself survives to enhance our understanding of the cultural landscape of the period. Recent scholarship suggests that a large and diverse poetic tradition lay behind the figure we refer to as "Homer," but little of it survives. Indeed we have little continuous written Greek for another century. The one exception is Hesiod, who composed two extant poems, the Theogony and Works and Days, and possibly several others, including the Shield of Heracles and the Catalogue of Women. As we shall see, while Hesiodic poetry was not occupied specifically with heroic themes, it was part of the same formal tradition of epic, sharing with Homer key metrical, dialectal, and dictional features.
  • The Etiquette of Games in Iliad 23 Scott, William C Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Fall 1997; 38, 3; Proquest Pg

    The Etiquette of Games in Iliad 23 Scott, William C Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Fall 1997; 38, 3; Proquest Pg

    The etiquette of games in Iliad 23 Scott, William C Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Fall 1997; 38, 3; ProQuest pg. 213 The Etiquette of Games in Iliad 23 William C. Scott Serious sport has nothing to do with fair play. It is bound up with hatred, boastfulness, disregard of all rules, and sadistic pleasure in witnessing violence: in other words, it is war minus the shooting. George Orwell HE GAME-NARRATIVE in Book 23 of the Iliad has been dis­ cussed from various erspectives but not as a unit that Tsupports the design of the epic through its detailed struc­ ture. Although the proper awarding of prizes clearly echoes the main theme of the poem, the book has been attacked by traditional analysts as an uneven patchwork, albeit composed of spirited remnants.1 Even those who incorporate this section of the narrative into the Iliad usually advance quickly through it in their eagerness to reach the high ground of Book 24.2 Several who focus directly on Book 23 employ it in defense of a more major point about Homeric composition: it has recently been mined for material supporting theories of consistent charac­ terization,3 for earlier narrative stories, 4 or for rules of conduct 1 The unity of the game-narrative has long been questioned by e.g. D. B. Munro, Homer, Iliad, Books XIII-XXIV· (Oxford 1897) II 398f; W. Leaf, The IliaJ2 (London 1902) II 468f; C. S. Kirk, The Songs of Homer (Cam­ bridge 1962) 222f; P. Chantraine and H. Couble, Homere, L'IHade, Chant XXIII (Paris 1964) 15ff; and M.
  • Pelops Hippodamia Pelops Pelops Hippodamia Zeus

    Pelops Hippodamia Pelops Pelops Hippodamia Zeus

    Tantalus = X Œnomaüs = Y Niobe Pelops = Hippodamia Chrysippus Lydia Pisa Mycenæ & Argos Peloponnese Hippodamia Pelops Hippodamia Pelops Pelops Hippodamia Zeus Œnomaüs Temple of Zeus, Olympia Tantalus = X Œnomaüs = Y Niobe Pelops = Hippodamia Pittheus Chysippus Atreus Thyestes Thebes Pisa Mycenæ & Argos Peloponnese Atreus vs Thyestes Sign 1: Golden Fleece Aëropē Sign 2: The Sun Delphic Oracle: Must beget child by own daughter, Pelopia Atreus = Aëropē Thyestes = X Pelopia Agamemnon Menelaus Ægisthus Mycenæ & Argos Sparta Recognition token: sword Leda wife of Tyndareus Leda Icarius Tyndareus = Leda Zeus Penelope Clytemnestra Castor Helen Polydeuces Clytemnestra = Agamemnon Helen = Menelaus Clytemnestra = Agamemnon Helen = Menelaus Iphigenia Orestes Electra Hermione Mycenæ / Argos Sparta Castor and Polydeuces Helen’s Suitors Oath of Tyndareus devised by Odysseus Winner: Menelaus Æacus = X (Ægina) Thetis = Peleus Telamon Phocus Achilles Telamonian Ajax (“The Greater”) (Phthia) (Salamis) Myrmidons = ant-men Phthia Salamis Ægina Peleus Thetis Eris Wedding of Peleus and Thetis Judgment of Paris Judgment of Paris Etruscan mirror Uni = Juno = Hera Menrfa = Minerva = Athena Turan = Venus = Aphrodite Georges Dumézil idéologie tripartite (three-part ideology) Sovereignty Kings Sanctity Hera Priests Law Warriors Military Power Athena Economy Peasants Fertility Aphrodite Production Priam = Hecuba Paris Hector many many (Alexander) (50+) (10+) other daughters sons Heinrich Schliemann discovered Troy (Wilusa) 1871 wife in “Helen’s Jewels” Where’s Odysseus? Odysseus = Penelope Telemachus Prophecy: Troy will not fall until/unless Achilles fights for the Greeks. Peleus = Thetis Achilles Achilles and Chiron Prophecy: Troy will not fall until/unless Achilles fights for the Greeks. Achilles on Scyros If I remain here, attacking city of the mighty Trojans, I lose my nostos, but I will have undying kleos.
  • A Dictionary of Mythology —

    A Dictionary of Mythology —

    Ex-libris Ernest Rudge 22500629148 CASSELL’S POCKET REFERENCE LIBRARY A Dictionary of Mythology — Cassell’s Pocket Reference Library The first Six Volumes are : English Dictionary Poetical Quotations Proverbs and Maxims Dictionary of Mythology Gazetteer of the British Isles The Pocket Doctor Others are in active preparation In two Bindings—Cloth and Leather A DICTIONARY MYTHOLOGYOF BEING A CONCISE GUIDE TO THE MYTHS OF GREECE AND ROME, BABYLONIA, EGYPT, AMERICA, SCANDINAVIA, & GREAT BRITAIN BY LEWIS SPENCE, M.A. Author of “ The Mythologies of Ancient Mexico and Peru,” etc. i CASSELL AND COMPANY, LTD. London, New York, Toronto and Melbourne 1910 ca') zz-^y . a k. WELLCOME INS77Tint \ LIBRARY Coll. W^iMOmeo Coll. No. _Zv_^ _ii ALL RIGHTS RESERVED INTRODUCTION Our grandfathers regarded the study of mythology as a necessary adjunct to a polite education, without a knowledge of which neither the classical nor the more modem poets could be read with understanding. But it is now recognised that upon mythology and folklore rests the basis of the new science of Comparative Religion. The evolution of religion from mythology has now been made plain. It is a law of evolution that, though the parent types which precede certain forms are doomed to perish, they yet bequeath to their descendants certain of their characteristics ; and although mythology has perished (in the civilised world, at least), it has left an indelible stamp not only upon modem religions, but also upon local and national custom. The work of Fruger, Lang, Immerwahr, and others has revolutionised mythology, and has evolved from the unexplained mass of tales of forty years ago a definite and systematic science.
  • Authoritative Response, Homeric Irony, and the Peril of a Missed Language Cue 1

    Authoritative Response, Homeric Irony, and the Peril of a Missed Language Cue 1

    This article belongs to a special issue of Oral Tradition published in honor of John Miles Foley’s 65th birthday and 2011 retirement. The surprise Festschrift, guest-edited by Lori and Scott Garner entirely without his knowledge, celebrates John’s tremendous impact on studies in oral tradition through a series of essays contributed by his students from the University of Missouri- Columbia (1979-present) and from NEH Summer Seminars that he has directed (1987-1996). http://journal.oraltradition.org/issues/26ii This page is intentionally left blank. Oral Tradition, 26/2 (2011): 493-520 “Stricken to Silence”: Authoritative Response, Homeric Irony, and the Peril of a Missed Language Cue 1 Andrew E. Porter The Formula The formula2 “Thus he spoke, but they in fact all were stricken to silence” (ὣς ἔφαθ’, οἳ δ’ ἄρα πάντες ἀκὴν ἐγένοντο σιωπῇ)3 occurs sixteen times in Homer4 and has received significant treatment in a number of recent studies focusing on its referential force. Its “connotative level of signification” (Kelly 2007:6) has been projected in part for the Iliad, and important themes and functions have been suggested. Silvia Montiglio (1993:175-78) has considered the formula’s meaning within the Iliad both etymologically and more generally, and found that it suggests “une rupture anormale,” “la déchirure” of the normal communication process. John Miles Foley has linked the formula in the Iliad with the speech that precedes it, since “each initial speech proposes or reports a radical, usually unexpected action” (1995:13) that promises either the winning or losing of kleos. Foley’s research further demonstrates that the 1 I wish to thank my anonymous external reviewers along with Casey Dué, Scott Garner, David Mulroy, and Kevin Muse for their remarks on earlier drafts of this article.