DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 6 81 Review of Electoral Arrangements COUNTY OF W LTSHIRE GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY OOMMIC SS ICON REPORT NUMBER 6 8 a. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN MR K F J ENNALS CB MEMBERS MR G R PRENTICE MRS H R V SARKANY MR C W SMITH PROFESSOR K YOUNG THE RT HON KENNETH CLARKE QC MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT PROPOSALS FOR CHANGE TO THE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE COUNTY OF WILTSHIRE INTRODUCTION 1. The present electoral arrangements for the County of Wiltshire date from May 1981 when the County of Wiltshire (Electoral Arrangements) Order 1981 came into force. It provided for 75 electoral divisions. 2. In 1983 Wiltshire County Council and Thamesdown Borough Council drew our attention to a number of electoral imbalances between county divisions. We concluded that because of major changes to the size and distribution of the electorate which had either taken place, or were expected to take place, a further review of the County's electoral arrangements would be appropriate. 3. Initially, we decided to conduct a two-stage review in order to deal firstly with the Toothill area of Swindon and, secondly, with the rest of the County. We reported our proposals for Toothill on 2 November 1984 in our Report No 486 and our proposals were implemented by an Order, which came into effect on 2 May 1985. However, when we came to the second stage of the review, the County Council drew our attention to the continued growth of the electorate in the Toothill area and requested a full review of the County. We therefore reconsidered our earlier decision and decided to conduct a full review of the County's electoral arrangements. 4. We announced the start of the review in a letter dated 3 September 1987 and invited the County Council or any other interested party, having regard to the requirements of Schedule 11 of the Local Government Act 1972, to submit to us a draft scheme for revised electoral arrangements for the County. Copies of the letter were sent to the County's five District Councils; to all the parish and town councils and parish meetings in the County; to local Members of Parliament; to the headquarters of the main political parties; to local newspapers, radio and television stations; and to the local government press. The start of the review was also announced by press and public notice. FORMULATION OF OUR DRAFT PROPOSALS (i) The County Council's Draft 5. On 17 February 1988, the County Council submitted a scheme based upon the 1987 electorate and the forecast electorate for 1992, which recommended an increase in the size of the Council from 75 to 76 members. It proposed an increase in the number of divisions in the Borough of Thamesdown by one with the number of divisions in the other four districts remaining unchanged. The scheme offered an improved standard of electoral representation by 1992 when 31 divisions would have ratios of electors to councillors varying 10% or less from the County average (compared to 16 under existing arrangements), and 20 divisions would vary from the average by more than 20% (against 27 under existing arrangements). However, we were concerned that the County Council's draft scheme still left too many divisions varying significantly from the County average. Furthermore, we were concerned that the ratio of electors per councillor would deteriorate significantly between 1987 and 1992 in the districts of North Wiltshire and West Wiltshire. rts on the County Council's Draft Scheme 6. We received 42 comments in response to the County Council's scheme, of which 13 were forwarded to us by the County Council. The comments included two alternative schemes for the whole county and one solely affecting the district of West Wiltshire. These are discussed below. (iii) Alternative Schemes 7. Alternative schemes for the whole County were submitted by Thamesdown Borough Council and the South-West Regional Office of the Labour Party. West Wiltshire Conservative Association submitted a scheme which provided alternative arrangements in West Wiltshire but otherwise was identical to the County Council's scheme. (iv) Our Conclusion 8. We considered that Thamesdown's scheme did not provide any significant improvement to the County Council's electoral arrangements in terms of electoral equality. West Wiltshire Conservative Association's scheme marginally improved the standard of representation in West Wiltshire, but it failed to address electoral imbalances in the rest of the County. We concluded that neither scheme offered any advantage over the County Council's scheme. 9. We considered, however, that proposals submitted by the South-West Regional Office of the Labour Party for a 68-member Council offered not only a better overall standard of representation than the County Council's scheme, but also enhanced the extent of cotenninosity between county and district councillors. We therefore decided to make this scheme the basis of our draft proposals. PUBLICATION OF OUR DRAFT PROPOSALS 10. Our draft proposals were issued on 12 January 1990. Copies were sent to the County Council, the five District Councils in Wiltshire and all those who had either received our consultation letter of 3 September 1987 or had made representations to us. Notices were also placed in local newspapers, announcing that the draft proposals had been published and could be inspected at the offices of the County or District Councils. Comments were invited by 9 March 1990. 11. Following a request by the County Council, we agreed to extend the deadline for receipt of comments by two months. A letter announcing this, and rectifying a small error in our draft proposals, was issued on 9 March 1990 and sent to all those who had received our draft proposals. We also asked the County Council to advertise notice of the extension in press and public notices. RESPONSE TO OUR DRAFT PROPOSALS 12. We received representations from Wiltshire County Council, the District Councils of Kennet, North Wiltshire, Salisbury, Thamesdown and West Wiltshire, 30 parish councils, two county councillors, one district councillor, the North Wiltshire Conservative Association, the North Wiltshire Liberal Democrats, the Labour Party branches for Salisbury, Bemerton, Thamesdown District, Swindon Constituency, Lower stratton, Wiltshire and Devizes Constituency, the Wiltshire Association of Local Councils and its Thamesdown Area Committee, the Governors of Wilton Church of England Middle School and three members of the public. In addition, Purton Parish Council forwarded a petition signed by 55 local residents opposing our draft proposals. Thirteen of these representations supported our draft proposals, while 42 opposed them, sixteen representations commented on our proposals for Salisbury, twelve apiece on our proposals for North Wiltshire and Thamesdown, eight on our proposals for Kennet and three on our proposals for West Wiltshire. The remaining four comments related to our proposals for the County as a whole. (i) Wiltshire county Council's Revised Scheme 13. The County Council responded with a revised scheme for a 69 member council (an increase of one member over our draft proposals). The most noticeable difference between Wiltshire's new scheme and our proposals was the creation of a fourteenth division in North Wiltshire, to be known as Dauntsey Vale. However, although the number of divisions in the other four districts was to be unchanged, Wiltshire proposed a few further amendments. In Kennet, it proposed that the parishes of Chute and Chute Forest should be in Collingbourne division rather than Bedwyn and Pewsey division and that Devizes South division should be re-named "Devizes South and Bromham", in both cases to reflect local ties. In North Wiltshire, in addition to the new Dauntsey Vale division, it proposed that minor amendments should be made to Chippenham Park and Town divisions, including their re-naming as North and South respectively, and that Box division should be re-named "Pickwick with Box". In Salisbury, it proposed modifications to the divisions of Amesbury, Downton, Salisbury Bemerton, Salisbury Harnham, Tisbury, and Wilton and Wylye, in order to reflect local ties. The County Council also loosely suggested creating a fourteenth division in West Wiltshire (which would further increase the council size to 70) but made no specific recommendation for the area the division would represent. (ii) Alternative suggestions for change 14. A number of suggestions for partial revision of our proposals were received concerning North Wiltshire, Salisbury and West Wiltshire. These are discussed in the following paragraphs on a district-by-district basis. (a) North Wiltshire 15. Four alternative suggestions were received. North Wiltshire District Council, like the County Council, recommended a fourteenth division for the district but, instead of creating a new division (as under the County Council's proposals), the District Council recommended the splitting of Cricklade and Purton into two separate divisions. Chippenham Town Council suggested creating four divisions for Chippenham instead of the three suggested in our draft proposals. This would also increase the number of divisions in North Wiltshire by one. North Wiltshire Liberal Democrats suggested adopting the County Council's proposals for North Wiltshire, except for Box and Corsham divisions, where it suggested that the District Council's proposals, providing for a Box division comprising the parishes of Box and Lacock and the Gastard and Neston town wards of Corsham, and a Corsham division comprising its town wards of Corsham and Pickwick, should be adopted. Finally, Lydiard Millicent Parish Council requested inclusion in Cricklade and Purton division rather than Wootton Bassett North division. (b) Salisbury 16. Two alternative suggestions were received. Salisbury District Council (supported by Idmiston Parish Council and Councillor Mrs J Hitchings) suggested the retention of fifteen divisions in the district, the transfer of the parishes of Firsdown and Landford to Alderbury and Downton divisions respectively and the transfer of Stratford district ward to Salisbury St Mark's division.
Recommended publications
  • 11 Snow Hill Hilmarton £450,000 Your Full Internet Details for Your Approval

    11 Snow Hill Hilmarton £450,000 Your Full Internet Details for Your Approval

    Your Full Internet details for your approval: Please read through the following sections which highlight the text/bullet points/photographs/floorplans that will be used for the marketing of your property. If a section is correct please simply tick the box at the end of that section. If any amendments are required, please could you make them to the document and then tick the box to confirm that you are happy subject to those amendments having been made. Then please sign the document as advised to confirm you are willing for us to proceed with live marketing. 11 Snow Hill Hilmarton £450,000 Text to be used as short description on brochure/online: A spacious period cottage, dating back to 1840, that has been extended to provide modern family living, the property is set within large mature gardens with double garage and ample parking. Please tick the box to confirm that you are happy with the text Text to be used as bullets on brochure/online: • Extended Period Property • Living Room with wood burner • Separate Dining Room • Kitchen/Breakfast Room •Four Bedrooms •Bathroom & En Suite •Double Garage •Large Mature Gardens Please tick the box to confirm that you are happy with the text Tel: 01793 853366 strakers.co.uk 11 Snow Hill, Hilmarton, SN11 9HU Text to be used within the brochure/online: Description A spacious period semi detached cottage, dating back to 1840, that has been extended to provide modern family living, the property is set within large mature gardens with double garage and ample parking. The accommodation comprises of reception hall, cloakroom, living room with feature wood burning stove and double glazed bi fold doors opening onto the delightful gardens, separate dining room with feature open fireplace, kitchen/breakfast room, utility/boot room, master bedroom with en suite shower room, three further bedrooms and family bathroom.
  • Public Opinion Survey – Devizes and Marlborough – Pewsey Section

    Public Opinion Survey – Devizes and Marlborough – Pewsey Section

    NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED / UNCLASSIFIED Public opinion survey – Devizes and Marlborough – Pewsey Section The Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner (OPCC) commissioned M.E.L. Research to consult local residents. During 2012/13 4408 Wiltshire residents completed the survey. A minimum of 384 people took part in each of the eleven policing sectors i ensuring that the results for each sector were significant ii . The aims of this survey are: o To measure public perception of Wiltshire Police and how communities are policed o To consult the public and enable the OPCC and Wiltshire Police to prepare policing plans o To enhance the OPCC and Wiltshire Police’s understanding of how policing influences people’s sense of security and wellbeing The report below sets out the results for the Pewsey section. A summary for the whole Force area will be available shortly on the Commissioner’s website. If you have any queries please contact the OPCC on the details below. Public perceptions linked to the Police and Crime Commissioner Priorities Pewsey Devizes and Wiltshire Police Force Section Marlborough Sector Area Feel safe when outside in their local area during the day 98.4% 96.6% 93.4% Feel safe when outside in their local area after dark 90.2% 75.1% 63.9% Satisfaction with the level of police visibility in their neighbourhood 62.3% 64.5% 59.1% Number Surveyed 61 384 4408 Population 13730 62680 684028 Key: significantly better than Wiltshire average* in line with Wiltshire average* significantly worse than Wiltshire average* * Wiltshire average
  • 12Th September 1894

    12Th September 1894

    Research Information: PRIVATE WALTER H. COOMBS, R.I.P. – 8th Wiltshires 12th September 1894 Walter Henry Coombs, born Dean, Hampshire, the son of Henry Source: Birth Certificate and Martha Coombs (Family living in Lockerley) 26th December 1896 Richard Herbert Coombs, born Lockerley, Hampshire, the son of Source: Birth Certificate Henry and Martha Coombs (Henry is a Groom) 1901 The Coombs family is listed as Henry, aged 41, born Fovant, Sourse: Census – Lockerley, Hants Groom ; Martha, aged 41, born Fovant; Walter aged 6 born, W.Dean; Herbert aged 4, born Lockerley, Hampshire (Henry is a Domestic Groom) Qtr 1 1903 Martha Coombs, wife of Henry Coombs (Henry is a Groom) died at Source: Death Certificate Bowerchalke, Wiltshire Qtr 4 1903 Wilton 5a 471 Henry Coombs marries Ann at Bowerchalk Source: Marriage Certificate Qtr 2 1905 Wilton 5a 189 Florence Nellie Coombs born, at Bowerchalk, the daughter of Source: R.G.I. Births Henry and Ann Coombs Qtr 1 1908 Wilton 5a 187 Thomas George Coombs born, at Bowerchalk, the son of Henry Source: R.G.I. Births and Ann Coombs 1911 The Coombs family is listed as Henry William, aged 51, born Source: Census - Bowerchalke Fovant, Farm Labourer; Ann, aged 40, born Bowerchalke; Herbert Richard aged 14, born Lockerley; Florence Nellie aged 6, born Bowerchalke and Thomas GeorgeCoombs aged 3, born in Bowerchalke all living at Binghams Farm, Bowerchalke (No Walter here at this time) 1911 Henry Walter Coombs, aged 16, born Dean, Hants. Occupation: Source: Census - Worthing Errand Boy 5th September 1914 Henry Walter Coombs, born in the parish of Lockerley, Hants aged Source: National Archives records 20 years and 11 months occupation Pantryman joins the Dorset Regiment with Reg.
  • Wiltshire | Conservatives

    Wiltshire | Conservatives

    Chippenham Conservative Association The Morrison Hall, 12 Brown Street, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP1 1HE 01722 333141 www.wiltshireconservatives.com Chippenham Conservative Chairman Conservatives Martin Newman Tel: 01225 864028 Email: [email protected] Association Administrator-Group Support Officer: Vikki Rebbeck Tel: 01722 333141. Email: [email protected] Atworth Bradford on Avon Broughton Gifford Chippenham Corsham Handbook Gastard Hilperton 2018 Holt Lacock Limpley Stoke Melksham Monkton Farleigh Neston South Wraxall Staverton Westwood Whitley Winsley Promoted, Printed and Published by: Chippenham Conservative Association The Morrison Hall, 12 Brown Street, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP1 1HE 15.08.18 www.wiltshireconservatives.com Chippenham Association: Officers: President: Mr Robert Floyd. The Manor, Gt. Chalfield, Melksham, SN12 8NA Vice Presidents: Sir James Fuller Bt. Neston Park, Neston, Corsham, SN13 9TG. Email: [email protected] Wiltshire Unitary Councillors: Mrs Mary Norton. Avalon, 155 Queens Crescent, Chippenham, SN14 0NW. Tel: 01249 650979. Email: [email protected] Corsham Town Mrs Carolyn Walker. 80 Monkton Farleigh, Bradford on Avon, BA15 2QJ. Tel: 01225 859555. Phil Whalley, 23 Prospect, Corsham, SN13 9AD. Tel: 01249 714227 (M) 07969 232358. Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Mrs Gwen Allison, 217 Trowbridge Road, Bradford On Avon, BA15 1EU. Tel: 01225 865154 . Email: [email protected] Corsham Without & Box Hill Ben Anderson, 27 Pound Mead, Corsham, SN13 9HA. Tel: 01249 322683 (M) 07824 807107. Chairman: Email: [email protected] Mr Martin Newman, 18B Newtown, Bradford On Avon, BA15 1NE. Tel: 01225 864028 Email: [email protected] Chippenham Cepen Park & Derriads Peter Hutton, 4 Ricardo Road, Chippenham, SN15 1PA.
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for North Wiltshire in Wiltshire

    Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for North Wiltshire in Wiltshire

    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for North Wiltshire in Wiltshire Further electoral review September 2006 1 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact the Boundary Committee for England: Tel: 020 7271 0500 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G 2 Contents What is the Boundary Committee for England? 5 Executive summary 7 1 Introduction 17 2 Current electoral arrangements 21 3 Draft recommendations 27 4 Responses to consultation 29 5 Analysis and final recommendations 31 Electorate figures 31 Council size 32 Electoral equality 32 General analysis 33 Warding arrangements 34 Brinkworth & The Somerfords, St Paul Malmesbury Without 35 & Sherston and Malmesbury wards Cricklade, Purton and Ashton Keynes & Minety wards 37 Lyneham, Hilmarton, Bremhill, Kington Langley, The 40 Lydiards & Broad Town and Calne Without wards Nettleton, Kington St Michael and Colerne wards 43 Box, Pickwick, Corsham and Lacock with Neston & Gastard 45 Chippenham area (11 wards) 48 Calne (six wards) 50 Wootton Bassett North and Wootton Bassett South wards 53 Conclusions 54 Parish electoral arrangements 54 6 What happens next? 59 7 Mapping 61 Appendices A Glossary and abbreviations 63 3 B Code of practice on written consultation 67 4 What is the Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of the Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000.
  • WILTSHIRE. F.AR 1111 Sharp Samuel, West End Mill, Donhead Smith Thomas, Everleigh, Marlborough Stride Mrs

    WILTSHIRE. F.AR 1111 Sharp Samuel, West End Mill, Donhead Smith Thomas, Everleigh, Marlborough Stride Mrs

    TRADES DIRECTORY. J WILTSHIRE. F.AR 1111 Sharp Samuel, West End mill, Donhead Smith Thomas, Everleigh, Marlborough Stride Mrs. Jas. Whiteparish, Salisbury St. Andrew, Salisbury Smith William, Broad Hinton, Swindon Strong George, Rowde, Devizes Sharpe Mrs. Henry, Ludwell, Salisbury Smith William, Winsley, Bradford Strong James, Everleigh, Marlborough Sharpe Hy. Samuel, Ludwell, Salisbury Smith William Hugh, Harpit, Wan- Strong Willialll, Draycot, Marlborough Sharps Frank, South Marston, Swindon borough, ShrivenhamR.S.O. (Berks) Strong William, Pewsey S.O Sharps Robert, South Marston, Swindon Snelgar John, Whiteparish, Salisbury Stubble George, Colerne, Chippenham Sharps W. H. South Marston, Swindon Snelgrove David, Chirton, De,·izes Sumbler John, Seend, Melksham Sheate James, Melksham Snook Brothers, Urchfont, Devizes SummersJ.&J. South Wraxhall,Bradfrd Shefford James, Wilton, Marlborough Snook Albert, South Marston, Swindon Summers Edwd. Wingfield rd. Trowbrdg ShepherdMrs.S.Sth.Burcombe,Salisbury Snook Mrs. Francis, Rowde, Devizes Sutton Edwd. Pry, Purton, Swindon Sheppard E.BarfordSt.Martin,Salisbury Snook George, South Marston, Swindon Sutton Fredk. Brinkworth, Chippenham Shergold John Hy. Chihnark, Salisbury EnookHerbert,Wick,Hannington,Swndn Sutton F. Packhorse, Purton, Swindon ·Sbewring George, Chippenham Snook Joseph, Sedghill, Shaftesbury Sutton Job, West Dean, Salisbury Sidford Frank, Wilsford & Lake farms, Snook Miss Mary, Urchfont, Devizes Sutton·John lllake, Winterbourne Gun- Wilsford, Salisbury Snook Thomas, Urchfont, Devizes ner, Salisbury "Sidford Fdk.Faulston,Bishopstn.Salisbry Snook Worthr, Urchfont, Devizes Sutton Josiah, Haydon, Swindon Sidford James, South Newton, Salisbury Somerset J. Milton Lilborne, Pewsey S.O Sutton Thomas Blake, Hurdcott, Winter­ Bimkins Job, Bentham, Purton, Swindon Spackman Edward, Axrord, Hungerford bourne Earls, Salisbury Simmons T. GreatSomerford, Chippenhm Spackman Ed. Tytherton, Chippenham Sutton William, West Ha.rnham,Salisbry .Simms Mrs.
  • Survey and Appraisal of Chute and Chute Forest Parishes 1984

    Survey and Appraisal of Chute and Chute Forest Parishes 1984

    I j I SURVEY AND APPRAISAL OF CHUTE AND CHUTE FOREST PARISHES 1984 -, .~ SURVEY AND APPRAISAL OF CHUTE AND CHUTE FOREST PARISHES 1984 ., t " CHUTE AND CHUTE FOREST SURVEY AND APPRAISAL 1984 The Main Study GrouD Liz Barker Bennett Barbara Brown typing Rosemary Casson Chute Forest Parish Council Audrey Cherrington Brian Edwards Rowena Gale Secretary Jim Gale Pat Hing .. Jean Husk Chute Parish Council/Study Group Leader Elizabeth Penman .. Soecial HelDers (Delivered and collected the Questionnaires) Beryl Abbott Marion Banwell Mary Brown Jim Buchanan Elaine Crowther Brian Edwards Janet Kleboe John Penman Margaret Pike Helen Taylor A. ~ecial "thank you" to Mr. and Mrs. Nash and Mrs. Haines, who spent time allowing me to "tape record" their personal reminiscences of the Chutes as it was in their young days. Other people too ha ve been generous with bits and pieces of recent history and suggestions of where I might "dig" for more. I wish it could have all been put in this survey -maybe a book will get written one day! Another special "thank you" to Les Tobutt, who found fossils and pieces of Romano-British tile. Thanks are also due to Hewlett-Packard Ltd. for the use of their word processing and laser printing equipment. Jean Husk - . ,. Introduction Village Surveys and Appraisals have been carried out all over England since Parish Councils were recommended to do so after the reorganisation of District and Rural Councils in 1974. The'Surveys were and are seen as a means of providing valuable local information for the more distant District Councils and an opportunity for the residents of parishes and villages to get to know more about each other as well as their localities.
  • WILTSHIRE Extracted from the Database of the Milestone Society

    WILTSHIRE Extracted from the Database of the Milestone Society

    Entries in red - require a photograph WILTSHIRE Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road No. Parish Location Position WI_AMAV00 SU 15217 41389 UC road AMESBURY Church Street; opp. No. 41 built into & flush with churchyard wall Stonehenge Road; 15m W offield entrance 70m E jcn WI_AMAV01 SU 13865 41907 UC road AMESBURY A303 by the road WI_AMHE02 SU 12300 42270 A344 AMESBURY Stonehenge Down, due N of monument on the Verge Winterbourne Stoke Down; 60m W of edge Fargo WI_AMHE03 SU 10749 42754 A344 WINTERBOURNE STOKE Plantation on the Verge WI_AMHE05 SU 07967 43180 A344 SHREWTON Rollestone top of hill on narrow Verge WI_AMHE06 SU 06807 43883 A360 SHREWTON Maddington Street, Shrewton by Blind House against wall on Verge WI_AMHE09 SU 02119 43409 B390 CHITTERNE Chitterne Down opp. tank crossing next to tree on Verge WI_AMHE12 ST 97754 43369 B390 CODFORD Codford Down; 100m W of farm track on the Verge WI_AMHE13 ST 96143 43128 B390 UPTON LOVELL Ansty Hill top of hill,100m E of line of trees on Verge WI_AMHE14 ST 94519 42782 B390 KNOOK Knook Camp; 350m E of entrance W Farm Barns on bend on embankment WI_AMWH02 SU 12272 41969 A303 AMESBURY Stonehenge Down, due S of monument on the Verge WI_AMWH03 SU 10685 41600 A303 WILSFORD CUM LAKE Wilsford Down; 750m E of roundabout 40m W of lay-by on the Verge in front of ditch WI_AMWH05 SU 07482 41028 A303 WINTERBOURNE STOKE Winterbourne Stoke; 70m W jcn B3083 on deep verge WI_AMWH11 ST 990 364 A303 STOCKTON roadside by the road WI_AMWH12 ST 975 356 A303 STOCKTON 400m E of parish boundary with Chilmark by the road WI_AMWH18 ST 8759 3382 A303 EAST KNOYLE 500m E of Willoughby Hedge by the road WI_BADZ08 ST 84885 64890 UC road ATWORTH Cock Road Plantation, Atworth; 225m W farm buildings on the Verge WI_BADZ09 ST 86354 64587 UC road ATWORTH New House Farm; 25m W farmhouse on the Verge Registered Charity No 1105688 1 Entries in red - require a photograph WILTSHIRE Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road No.
  • Village Diary for January 4 Table Tennis 9

    Village Diary for January 4 Table Tennis 9

    Village Diary for January 4 Table tennis 9 Luncheon Club / Parish Council 11 Mobile Library / Table Tennis 18 Probus / Women’s Institute 23 Luncheon Club 25 Table Tennis Church Services for January Sunday, 7th January Epiphany or Baptism of Christ 10.30am Holy Communion at Christian Malford Thursday, 11th January 9am Morning Prayer at Christian Malford Sunday, 14th January Epiphany 2 10.30am Coffee, Chat and Craft Christian Malford Sunday, 21st January Epiphany 3 10.30am United Benefice Holy Communion at Christian Malford Thursday, 25th January 9am Morning Prayer at Christian Malford Sunday, 28th January Epiphany 4 9am Holy Communion at Christian Malford Refuse collections for January Blue lid bin collections - Saturday 6th and Thursday 18th. Household waste, garden waste and black box collections Friday 12th and Thursday 25th To check your collection days visit: www.wiltshire.gov.uk/rubbish-collection-days Village Memorial Cross. Most days many villagers will walk past the memorial cross situated on The Green and perhaps cast a glance at the names of the servicemen carved thereon. Details of those servicemen and the circumstances in which they died will appear in these pages. Most died in the first world war and the brief notes that describe the circumstances in which they died bring home the sheer horror and often chaos of their situation. Private WILLIAM HENRY FREEGARD 202515, 2nd Battalion, Wiltshire Regiment who died on 8th May 1918 Son of Edward and Julia Freegard of 82 Thornend, Christian Malford, Wiltshire Remembered with honour at Tyne Cot Memorial William was son of a railway labourer living in the village.
  • Hankerton - Marriages out of Parish 1609-1836

    Hankerton - Marriages out of Parish 1609-1836

    Hankerton - Marriages Out of Parish 1609-1836 Father's Given Banns Father's Given Year Date Groom's Surname Given Names Age Status Occupation Groom's Parish Bride's Surname Names Age Status Occupation Bride's Parish or Lic Surname Name Notes Marriage Parish 1609 23-May Washbourne Thomas Hankerton Charlton 1645 18-Oct Curtis Henry Hankerton Malmesbury 1654 03-Mar Pierce Henry Crudwell Stock Elizabeth Hankerton Stock Henry Bride is dau of Elizabeth Malmesbury 1655 16-Apr Stocke William Hankerton Neale Katherine Neale Thomas Groom is son of Joyce Malmesbury 1655 22-Apr Woodlands John Hankerton Woodward Anne Hankerton Malmesbury 1655 16-Jun Wagginer John Hankerton Davies Alice Hankerton Malmesbury 1656 02-Jan Golding Thomas Charlton Stock Joyce Hankerton Groom is son of Isabell Malmesbury 1656 17-Jul Richman or Webbe Richard Hankerton Boxewell Sarah Charlton Malmesbury 1656 29-Jul Davisonn Nicholas Roade Reynolds Mary Hankerton Reynolds John Bride is dau of Jane Malmesbury 1656 04-Dec Courteouse John Husbandman Hankerton Golding Jane Charlton Golding Christ. Bride is dau of Isabell Malmesbury 1657 27-Feb Baylie Thos or John Carpenter Davis Anne Spinster Hankerton Groom son of Joan Baylie widow and Bride dau of Ann Davis Malmesbury 1657 10-Dec Miles William Husbandman Hankerton Harwell Elizabeth Hankerton Harwell Edward Malmesbury 1660 30-Jul Mr Samson Anthony Minister Hankerton Mrs Peddington or Tucke Anne Hankerton Richard Malmesbury 1661 02-Jan Woodlands Matthew Hankerton Lawrence Elonor Charlton 1661 11-Oct Bishop Jeremy Hamton Rode Savidge
  • Pdf Download of Current Issue

    Pdf Download of Current Issue

    ofoVOLUME 5, NUMBERf 2 coursecourseWINTER 2005 A GLASS ACT Blowing the Bristol Blues WORKING TOGETHER Apache httpd and Apache Tomcat SPECIAL SECTION Guide to local accommodation He who dares, forums It’s traditional ... at the end of your train- ing course, the last you ever see of your tu- tor is the tail lights of his car as he turns the corner out of your office. I admit it. I was frightened. Here was Lisa suggesting that we provide a feedback page where people, where any- Melksham Marketplace in the town centre is one, can ask questions about the subjects we only a mile from our training centre teach, about the examples we provide, and about us. A page where people can come Is it the place to be? after their course and ask, “I tried this but can you give me a further explanation?” or “Is Melksham the right place to have our “Why isn’t this working?” or “Can you sug- training centre”? gest an easier way?” A question we ask ourselves from time to It hadn’t been tried before. Oh, there are time, and we come up with a resounding, Contents now plenty of forums on the Internet, but “Yes, it is!” when Opentalk was launched there were The town’s well connected – it’s just 90 He who dares, Forums ............. 2 far fewer. And there remain very few open minutes by train from London and about 20 Is it the place to be? ................. 2 forums operated by training companies. Yet minutes off the M4. Our training centre is Wiki Watch ...............................
  • Lyneham and Bradenstoke Neighbourhood Development Plan 2016 to 2026 Draft June 2020

    Lyneham and Bradenstoke Neighbourhood Development Plan 2016 to 2026 Draft June 2020

    Lyneham and Bradenstoke Neighbourhood Development Plan 2016 to 2026 Draft June 2020 Table of Contents List of Figures i Glossary ii Foreword iii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 What is the Neighbourhood Plan? 1 1.2 Preparing the Plan 1 2 The Parish of Lyneham and Bradenstoke 3 2.1 History 3 2.1.1 Lyneham 3 2.1.2 Bradenstoke 4 2.1.3 Preston, Thickthorn and Woodside Cottages 5 2.2 Lyneham and Bradenstoke Today 6 2.2.1 Lyneham 6 2.2.2 Bradenstoke 7 2.2.3 Preston and Thickthorn 7 2.2.4 Woodside Cottages 8 3 Objectives 9 3.1 What Matters Most to our Community 9 3.2 Objectives 11 4 Strategic Aims 12 4.1 Housing Strategic Aims 12 4.2 Business, Employment and Services Strategic Aims 12 4.3 Leisure, Recreation and Open Space Strategic Aims 12 4.4 Getting Around Strategic Aims 12 5 Housing 13 5.1 Housing Strategic Aims 13 5.2 Housing Objectives 13 5.3 Housing - Context 13 Policy 1: Small Scale Residential Development 14 Policy 2: Design 14 6 Business, Employment and Services 16 6.1 Business, Employment & Services Strategic Aims 16 6.2 Business, Employment and Services Objectives 16 6.3 Business, Employment and Services Context 16 6.3.1 Business 16 6.3.2 Health Services 17 Policy 3: Brownfield Employment Development 17 Policy 4: Social and Medical Facilities 17 7 Leisure, Recreation and Open Space 18 7.1 Leisure, Recreation and Open Space Strategic Aims 18 7.2 Leisure, Recreation and Open Space Objectives 18 7.3 Leisure, Recreation and Open Spaces Context 20 Policy 5: Sports Facilities 21 Policy 6: Local Green Spaces 21 1.