Integrated Crop Management of Src Plantations to Maximise Crop Value, Wildlife Benefits and Other Added Value Opportunities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Integrated Crop Management of Src Plantations to Maximise Crop Value, Wildlife Benefits and Other Added Value Opportunities INTEGRATED CROP MANAGEMENT OF SRC PLANTATIONS TO MAXIMISE CROP VALUE, WILDLIFE BENEFITS AND OTHER ADDED VALUE OPPORTUNITIES ETSU B/W2/00400/REP Contractor The Game Conservancy Trust Prepared by R Sage K Tucker The work described in this report was carried out under contract as part of the New and Renewable Energy Programme, managed by the Energy Technology Support Unit (ETSU) on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry. The views and judgements expressed in this report are those of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of ETSU or the Department of Trade and Industry. First published 1998 © Crown copyright 1998 CONTENTS *COMPLETE REPORT NOT AVAILABLE ELECTRONICALLY* PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 INTEGRATED CROP MANAGEMENT IN SRC - 1 INTRODUCTION CROP AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS 2.0 SRC STUDY SITES 4 3.0 CROP GROWTH 12 3.1 SUMMARY 12 3.2 INTRODUCTION 12 3.3 LEAFING TIMES 13 3.4 LEAF AREA 13 3.5 COPPICE HEIGHT 14 3.6 BIOMASS DATA 15 4.0 NON-DESTRUCTIVE ASSESSMENTS OF SRC 19 BIOMASS 4.1 SUMMARY 19 4.2 INTRODUCTION 20 4.3 METHOD 20 4.3.1 Theory 4.3.2 Trial site 4.3.3 Data collection 4.3.4 Analyses 4.3.5 Case study 4.4 RESULTS 23 4.4.1 The relationships between actual biomass and stem dimensions 4.4.2 How many stools need to be measured? 4.4.3 Case study results 4.5 DISCUSSION 32 4.5.1 The best measure of biomass 4.5.2 How many stools? 4.5.3 Case study discussion 4.6 REFERENCES 37 5.0 QUANTIFYING CROP SHADINESS 38 5.1 SUMMARY 38 5.2 INTRODUCTION 38 5.3 METHODS - EQUIPMENT AND SAMPLING 39 STRATEGY 5.4 RESULTS 40 5.5 DISCUSSION 41 5.6 REFERENCES 41 6.0 THE EFFECTS OF EXPOSURE ON CROP GROWTH 43 6.1 SUMMARY 43 6.2 INTRODUCTION 43 6.3 STUDY SITE AND METHOD 44 6.4 RESULTS 44 6.4.1 Wildlife and landscape 6.4.2 Exposure trial 6.5 DISCUSSION 46 6.6 REFERENCES 46 INVERTEBRATES 7.0 INVERTEBRATES COLONISING UK SRC 48 PLANTATIONS - BIODIVERSITY POTENTIAL 7.1 SUMMARY 48 7.2 INTRODUCTION 48 7.3 METHODS 50 7.3.1 Site selection and sampling strategy 7.3.2 Sampling invertebrates from the coppice canopy 7.3.3 Sampling ground and rove beetles using pitfall traps 7.3.4 Invertebrate identification 7.3.5 Analysis 7.4 RESULTS 53 7.4.1 Invertebrates in the canopy of the coppice plantations 7.4.2 Ground and rove beetles 7.5 DISCUSSION 55 7.5.1 Phytophagous insects on free-living willows and poplars 7.5.2 Comparing invertebrate numbers between willow and poplar 7.5.3 Comparing the number of invertebrates on SRC with cereal crop 7.6 REFERENCES 59 8.0 WHICH INVERTEBRATES ARE, OR COULD 66 BECOME, PESTS? 8.1 SUMMARY 66 8.2 INTRODUCTION 67 8.3 METHODS 67 8.31. Site selection and invertebrate sampling 8.3.2 Measuring crop leaf area, defoliation and stem growth 8.3.3 Investigating the relationships between crop growth, defoliation and invertebrate abundance 8.4 RESULTS 69 8.4.1 The main abundant invertebrates 8.4.2 Other species that have pest potential 8.4.3 Defoliation 8.4.4 The impact of defoliation on crop growth 8.5 DISCUSSION 85 8.5.1 The common herbivorous insects 8.5.2 Defoliation and pest numbers 8.5.3 Defoliation and stem growth 8.6 REFERENCES 90 9.0 THE NATURAL CONTROL AGENTS OF THE PESTS 94 OF SRC 9.1 SUMMARY 94 9.2 INTRODUCTION 95 9.3 METHODS 96 9.3.1 The predatory beetles of SRC 9.3.2 The insect predators of SRC pests 9.3.3 The avian predators of SRC pests 9.3.4 Parasitism and other causes of mortality in over ­ wintering chrysomelids 9.4 RESULTS 104 9.4.1 The predatory beetles of SRC The insect predators of SRC pests The avian predators of SRC pests Parasitism and other causes of mortality in over­ wintering chrysomelids 9.5 DISCUSSION 121 9.6 REFERENCES 125 10.0 THE ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF 128 CHRYSOMELIDS BETWEEN SITES 10.1 SUMMARY 128 10.2 INTRODUCTION 129 10.3 METHODS 129 10.3.1 Quantifying beetle abundance 10.3.2 The distribution of beetles between sites and years 10.3.3 The distribution of other common herbivores between sites and years 10.4 RESULTS 132 10.4.1 The abundance and distribution of chrysomelids 10.4.2 Factors affecting the distribution of chrysomelids between sites 10.4.3 The distribution of other common herbivores between sites and years 10.5 DISCUSSION 136 10.6 REFERENCES 139 11.0 PREFERENCES EXHIBITED BY CHRYSOMELIDS 142 FOR DIFFERENT VARIETIES 11.1 SUMMARY 142 11.2 INTRODUCTION 143 11.3 METHODS 143 11.3.1 Comparisons between varieties at a range of sites 11.3.2 A comparison between mixed and monovarietal blocks 11.4 RESULTS 1 44 11.4.1 Species selection 11.4.2 Varietal selection 11.4.3 Mixed v monovarietal 11.5 DISCUSSION 157 11.5.1 Varietal selection by chrysomelids 11.5.2 Varietal selection 11.5.3 Mixed v monovarietal 11.5.4 Plant traits that influence varietal selection 11.6 REFERENCES 162 12.0 OVERWINTERING AND DISPERSAL OF 165 CHRYSOMELIDS INTO SRC - AN OPPORTUNITY FOR CONTROL 12.1 SUMMARY 165 12.2 INTRODUCTION 166 12.3 METHODS 166 12.3.1 Study sites and overwintering surveys 12.3.2 Trapping emerging chrysomelids 12.3.3 Chrysomelids in the coppice canopy (1995) 12.3.4 Chrysomelids in the coppice canopy (1996) 12.3.5 Analyses 12.4 RESULTS 170 12.4.1 Overwintering 12.4.2 Beetle trapping 12.4.3 Canopy beat sampling (1995) 12.4.4 Canopy beat sampling (1996) 12.4.5 Temperature and leafing times 12.5 DISCUSSION 179 12.5.1 Overwintering 12.5.2 Emergence and dispersal 12.5.3 Colonising the crop edge 12.5.4 Dispersing to the crop interior 12.5.5 An opportunity to control chrysomelids 12.6 REFERENCES 182 13.0 INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT - INSECTS 185 13.1 SUMMARY 185 13.2 INTRODUCTION 186 13.3 THE MAIN PESTS AND DAMAGE 186 13.3.1 Economic thresholds and cost benefit 13.4 NATURAL CONTROLS 188 13.5 PLANTATION DESIGN 189 13.6 VARIETAL SELECTION 189 13.7 THE USE OF LOCAL INSECTICIDES 190 13.8 DISEASE 192 13.9 REFERENCES 193 THE VERTEBRATE FAUNA 14.0 BIRDS IN WINTER 194 14.1 SUMMARY 194 14.2 INTRODUCTION 194 14.3 METHODS 195 14.4 RESULTS 196 14.5 DISCUSSION 199 14.6 REFERENCES 201 15.0 SNIPE IN WINTER 205 15.1 SUMMARY 205 15.2 INTRODUCTION 205 15.3 METHODS 206 15.3.1 Winter bird surveys 15.3.2 Snipe habitat use 15.4 RESULTS 209 15.5 DISCUSSION 211 15.6 REFERENCES 212 16.0 THE BREEDING BIRDS OF SRC 214 16.1 SUMMARY 214 16.2 INTRODUCTION 215 16.3 METHODS 215 16.4 RESULTS 216 16.5 DISCUSSION 232 16.6 REFERENCES 235 17.0 GAMEBIRD USE OF SRC 240 17.1 SUMMARY 240 17.2 INTRODUCTION 240 17.3 METHODS 241 17.3.1 Study site 17.3.2 Gamebird use assessment method 17.4 RESULTS 242 17.5 DISCUSSION 244 17.6 REFERENCES 244 18.0 MAMMALS AND OTHER VERTEBRATES OF SRC 246 18.1 SUMMARY 246 18.2 INTRODUCTION 246 18.3 MAMMALS 247 18.4 REPTILES NAD AMPHIBIANS 248 18.5 CONCLUSIONS 248 18.6 REFERENCES 248 THE GROUND FLORA 19.0 CHANGES IN GROUND FLORA WITH TIME 249 19.1 SUMMARY 249 19.2 INTRODUCTION 250 19.3 METHODS 251 19.3.1 Collection of the vegetation data 19.3.2 Analysis of the vegetation data 19.4 RESULTS 255 19.4.1 General trends and statistics from the species data 19.4.2 Results of analysis using TABLEFIT 19.4.3 Results of analysis using DECORANA 19.4.4 Results of analysis using plant ecological strategies 19.5 DISCUSSION 265 19.6 REFERENCES 271 20.0 GROUND FLORA INTRODUCTIONS 276 20.1 SUMMARY 276 20.2 INTRODUCTION 277 20.3 METHODS 278 20.3.1 Site selection and site characteristics 20.3.2 Measuring crop shadiness 20.3.3 Plant species selection 20.3.4 Plot design and preparation 20.3.5 Sowing and planting 20.3.6 Monitoring 20.4 RESULTS 285 20.4.1 Site characteristics 20.4.2 Crop shadiness 20.4.3 Species selection 20.4.4 Monitoring 20.5 DISCUSSION 297 20.6 REFERENCES 301 21.0 THE EFFECTS OF WEEDS ON THE GROWTH OF 307 SRC 21.1 SUMMARY 307 21.2 INTRODUCTION 308 21.3 METHODS 310 21.3.1 Study sites 21.3.2 Trial design 21.3.3 Treatments 21.3.4 Coppice growth 21.3.5 Weediness 21.3.6 Soil survey 21.3.7 Percentage active radiation 21.3.8 Analysis 21.4 RESULTS 317 21.4.1 Weediness 21.4.2 Pre-treatment stool growth 21.4.3 Stool growth during year one 21.4.4 Stool growth during year two 21.4.5 Stool growth over two years 21.4.6 Soil analysis 21.4.7 Number of stems per stool 21.4.8 First year crop height 21.4.9 Canopy light penetration 21.5 DISCUSSION 333 21.5.1 The relationship between growth losses and weediness 21.5.2 Causes of growth losses 21.6 REFERENCES 337 22.0 INTEGRATED CROP MANAGEMENT IN SRC 340 PLANTATIONS - AN OVERVIEW 22.1 SUMMARY 340 22.2 INTRODUCTION 341 22.3 WEED COMPETITION AT ESTABLISHMENT 341 22.4 WEED COMPETITION IN ESTABLISHED COPPICE 342 22.5 THE DEVELOPMENT OF PLANT COMMUNITIES IN 342 SRC 22.6 THE ECONOMIC THRESHOLD FOR WEEDS IN 344 ESTABLISHED COPPICE 22.6.1 Cost benefit analysis 22.6.2 Cutting weeds 22.7 FERTILISATION 346 22.8 REFERENCES 347 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Objectives The primary objective of the work described in this report is to develop an Integrated Crop Management (ICM) approach for SRC willow and poplar crops.
Recommended publications
  • VIEW from the HELM May 2012 Time Flies When You’Re Busy at the Club
    Private Ear NEWSLETTER OF PRIVATEER YACHT CLUB Lake Chickamauga Chattanooga, TN May 2012 www.privateeryachtclub.org Peter Snyder, Editor pfsnyder3@bellsouth.net VIEW FROM THE HELM May 2012 Time flies when you’re busy at the club. Well, goes on. Come join in on the largest sail camp yet. Yes, a month has passed, and believe it or not my boat is this year we have potentially nine weeks of sail camp. launched! Yes, Whatta Ride is no longer on the hard, and my “view” is no longer myopically limited to the June also brings three days of racing each week, kayak- bottom of Whatta Ride’s hull. ing, and socials. The “Chicks On the Pond Sailing” are having a stake your date party! Sorry, dates and steaks Your club is buzzing with activity. We have had a hive party. Also, the club social will be a “Spanish Nights” of activities and more to come. This month saw a very themed affair. Margaritas? Cerveza? Holy Guacamole! successful Scowabunga, MC Scow regatta with 28 par- Don’t miss this one. See you there, bring your sombre- ticipants, some from as far as New Jersey. Also, a well ros. Maybe our Blue Grass players will play mariachi attended, get-to-know the MC Scow Friday night sail music. and burgers party. And, don’t forget the “Dock Party” which was a “jammin” good time avec “pickin and grin- nin’”. If you missed the story about the comforts of a kilt, just ask Rhonda Seeber to ribbon the details for you. It was truly a first place story.
    [Show full text]
  • Topic Paper Chilterns Beechwoods
    . O O o . 0 O . 0 . O Shoping growth in Docorum Appendices for Topic Paper for the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC A summary/overview of available evidence BOROUGH Dacorum Local Plan (2020-2038) Emerging Strategy for Growth COUNCIL November 2020 Appendices Natural England reports 5 Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation 6 Appendix 1: Citation for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC) 7 Appendix 2: Chilterns Beechwoods SAC Features Matrix 9 Appendix 3: European Site Conservation Objectives for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation Site Code: UK0012724 11 Appendix 4: Site Improvement Plan for Chilterns Beechwoods SAC, 2015 13 Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 27 Appendix 5: Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI citation 28 Appendix 6: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 31 Appendix 7: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 33 Appendix 8: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Ashridge Commons and Woods, SSSI, Hertfordshire/Buckinghamshire 38 Appendix 9: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Ashridge Commons and Woods Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003 40 Tring Woodlands SSSI 44 Appendix 10: Tring Woodlands SSSI citation 45 Appendix 11: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 48 Appendix 12: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 51 Appendix 13: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Tring Woodlands SSSI 53 Appendix 14: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Tring Woodlands Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometrid Larvae of the Alpi Marittime Natural Park
    Geometrid larvae of the Alpi Marittime Natural Park (district of Valdieri, Cuneo, Italy), with descriptions of the larvae of two Gnophini Pierce, 1914 (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Geometridae) Gareth Edward KING Departamento de Biología (Zoología), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28069 Cantoblanco, Madrid (Spain) sterrhinae@gmail.com Félix Javier GONZÁLEZ-ESTÉBANEZ Departamento de Biodiversidad y Gestión Ambiental, Universidad de León, 24071 León (Spain) fjgonzest@gmail.com Published on 31 December 2015 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:36697C66-C6FF-4FC0-BD97-303C937A0BEF King G. E. & González-Estébanez F. J. 2015. — Geometrid larvae of the Alpi Marittime Natural Park (district of Valdieri, Cuneo, Italy), with descriptions of the larvae of two Gnophini Pierce, 1914 (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Geometridae), in Daugeron C., Deharveng L., Isaia M., Villemant C. & Judson M. (eds), Mercantour/Alpi Marittime All Taxa Biodiversity Inventory. Zoosystema 37 (4): 621-631. http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2015n4a8 KEY WORDS Insecta, ABSTRACT Lepidoptera, Examination of 14 plant families in the Alpi Marittime Alps Natural Park (Valdieri, Italy) resulted in Geometridae, Gnophini, the collection of 103 larvae of 28 geometrid taxa; these belong to three subfamilies, with Ennominae Italy, Duponchel, 1845 being the most representative (13 taxa = 46.4%). Th e fi nal instar (L5) of two taxa Maritime Alps, in the tribe Gnophini Pierce, 1914, Gnophos furvata meridionalis Wehrli, 1924 and Charissa pullata larvae, morphology, ([Denis & Schiff ermüller], 1775) is described, including its chaetotaxy. Biological data and observa- chaetotaxy. tions are provided for all taxa. RÉSUMÉ Les larves de Geometridae collectées dans le Parc naturel des Alpi Marittime (district Valdieri, Cuneo, Italie), MOTS CLÉS Insecta, avec la description des larves de deux espèces de Gnophini Pierce, 1914 (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Geometridae).
    [Show full text]
  • Elytra Reduction May Affect the Evolution of Beetle Hind Wings
    Zoomorphology https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-017-0388-1 ORIGINAL PAPER Elytra reduction may affect the evolution of beetle hind wings Jakub Goczał1 · Robert Rossa1 · Adam Tofilski2 Received: 21 July 2017 / Revised: 31 October 2017 / Accepted: 14 November 2017 © The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract Beetles are one of the largest and most diverse groups of animals in the world. Conversion of forewings into hardened shields is perceived as a key adaptation that has greatly supported the evolutionary success of this taxa. Beetle elytra play an essential role: they minimize the influence of unfavorable external factors and protect insects against predators. Therefore, it is particularly interesting why some beetles have reduced their shields. This rare phenomenon is called brachelytry and its evolution and implications remain largely unexplored. In this paper, we focused on rare group of brachelytrous beetles with exposed hind wings. We have investigated whether the elytra loss in different beetle taxa is accompanied with the hind wing shape modification, and whether these changes are similar among unrelated beetle taxa. We found that hind wings shape differ markedly between related brachelytrous and macroelytrous beetles. Moreover, we revealed that modifications of hind wings have followed similar patterns and resulted in homoplasy in this trait among some unrelated groups of wing-exposed brachelytrous beetles. Our results suggest that elytra reduction may affect the evolution of beetle hind wings. Keywords Beetle · Elytra · Evolution · Wings · Homoplasy · Brachelytry Introduction same mechanism determines wing modification in all other insects, including beetles. However, recent studies have The Coleoptera order encompasses almost the quarter of all provided evidence that formation of elytra in beetles is less currently known animal species (Grimaldi and Engel 2005; affected by Hox gene than previously expected (Tomoyasu Hunt et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Changes in Lipid and Fatty Acid Profiles of Sakarya
    Eurasian Journal of Forest Science ISSN: 2147 - 7493 Copyrights Eurasscience Journals Editor in Chief Hüseyin Barış TECİMEN University of Istanbul, Faculty of Forestry, Soil Science and Ecology Dept. İstanbul, Türkiye Journal Cover Design Mert EKŞİ Istanbul University Faculty of Forestry Department of Landscape Techniques Bahçeköy-Istanbul, Turkey Technical Advisory Osman Yalçın YILMAZ Surveying and Cadastre Department of Forestry Faculty of Istanbul University, 34473, Bahçeköy, Istanbul-Türkiye Cover Page Bolu forests, Turkey 2019 Ufuk COŞGUN Contact H. Barış TECİMEN Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Faculty of Forestry, Soil Science and Ecology Dept. İstanbul, Turkey hbarist@gmail.com Journal Web Page http://dergipark.gov.tr/ejejfs Eurasian Journal of Forest Science Eurasian Journal of Forest Science is published 3 times per year in the electronic media. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. In submitting the manuscript, the authors certify that: They are authorized by their coauthors to enter into these arrangements. The work described has not been published before (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review or thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication has been approved by all the authors and by the responsible authorities tacitly or explicitly of the institutes where the work has been carried out. They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere. The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List the Relict Leopard Frog (Rana Onca) As an Endangered Species Under the Endangered Species Act
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR PETITION TO LIST THE RELICT LEOPARD FROG (RANA ONCA) AS AN ENDANGERED SPECIES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE PETITIONERS May 8, 2002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The relict leopard frog (Rana onca) has the dubious distinction of being one of the first North American amphibians thought to have become extinct. Although known to have inhabited at least 64 separate locations, the last historical collections of the species were in the 1950s and this frog was only recently rediscovered at 8 (of the original 64) locations in the early 1990s. This extremely endangered amphibian is now restricted to only 6 localities (a 91% reduction from the original 64 locations) in two disjunct areas within the Lake Mead National Recreation Area in Nevada. The relict leopard frog historically occurred in springs, seeps, and wetlands within the Virgin, Muddy, and Colorado River drainages, in Utah, Nevada, and Arizona. The Vegas Valley leopard frog, which once inhabited springs in the Las Vegas, Nevada area (and is probably now extinct), may eventually prove to be synonymous with R. onca. Relict leopard frogs were recently discovered in eight springs in the early 1990s near Lake Mead and along the Virgin River. The species has subsequently disappeared from two of these localities. Only about 500 to 1,000 adult frogs remain in the population and none of the extant locations are secure from anthropomorphic events, thus putting the species at an almost guaranteed risk of extinction. The relict leopard frog has likely been extirpated from Utah, Arizona, and from the Muddy River drainage in Nevada, and persists in only 9% of its known historical range.
    [Show full text]
  • Abatement Patterns of Predation Risk in an Insect Herbivore Jörg G
    Predator hunting mode and host plant quality shape attack- abatement patterns of predation risk in an insect herbivore Jörg G. Stephan,1,† Matthew Low,1 Johan A. Stenberg,2 and Christer Björkman1 1Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7044, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden 2Department of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 102, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden Citation: Stephan, J. G., M. Low, J. A. Stenberg, and C. Björkman. 2016. Predator hunting mode and host plant quality shape attack- abatement patterns of predation risk in an insect herbivore. Ecosphere 7(11):e01541. 10.1002/ecs2.1541 Abstract. Group formation reduces individual predation risk when the proportion of prey taken per predator encounter declines faster than the increase in group encounter rate (attack-abatement). Despite attack- abatement being an important component of group formation ecology, several key aspects have not been empirically studied, that is, interactions with the hunting mode of the predator and how these relationships are modified by local habitat quality. In 79 cage trials, we examined individual egg predation risk in different- sized egg clutches from the blue willow beetle Phratora vulgatissima for two predators with different hunting modes (consumption of full group [Orthotylus marginalis] vs. part group [Anthocoris nemorum]). Because these predators also take nutrients from plant sap, we could examine how the quality of alternative food sources (high- vs. low- quality host plant sap) influenced attack-abatement patterns in the presence of different hunting strategies. For the O. marginalis predator, individual egg predation risk was largely independent of group size.
    [Show full text]
  • T1)E Bedford,1)Ire Naturaii,T 45
    T1)e Bedford,1)ire NaturaIi,t 45 Journal for the year 1990 Bedfordshire Natural History Society 1991 'ISSN 0951 8959 I BEDFORDSHffiE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY 1991 Chairman: Mr D. Anderson, 88 Eastmoor Park, Harpenden, Herts ALS 1BP Honorary Secretary: Mr M.C. Williams, 2 Ive! Close, Barton-le-Clay, Bedford MK4S 4NT Honorary Treasurer: MrJ.D. Burchmore, 91 Sundon Road, Harlington, Dunstable, Beds LUS 6LW Honorary Editor (Bedfordshire Naturalist): Mr C.R. Boon, 7 Duck End Lane, Maulden, Bedford MK4S 2DL Honorary Membership Secretary: Mrs M.]. Sheridan, 28 Chestnut Hill, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, Beds LU7 7TR Honorary Scientific Committee Secretary: Miss R.A. Brind, 46 Mallard Hill, Bedford MK41 7QS Council (in addition to the above): Dr A. Aldhous MrS. Cham DrP. Hyman DrD. Allen MsJ. Childs Dr P. Madgett MrC. Baker Mr W. Drayton MrP. Soper Honorary Editor (Muntjac): Ms C. Aldridge, 9 Cowper Court, Markyate, Herts AL3 8HR Committees appointed by Council: Finance: Mr]. Burchmore (Sec.), MrD. Anderson, Miss R. Brind, Mrs M. Sheridan, Mr P. Wilkinson, Mr M. Williams. Scientific: Miss R. Brind (Sec.), Mr C. Boon, Dr G. Bellamy, Mr S. Cham, Miss A. Day, DrP. Hyman, MrJ. Knowles, MrD. Kramer, DrB. Nau, MrE. Newman, Mr A. Outen, MrP. Trodd. Development: Mrs A. Adams (Sec.), MrJ. Adams (Chairman), Ms C. Aldridge (Deputy Chairman), Mrs B. Chandler, Mr M. Chandler, Ms]. Childs, Mr A. Dickens, MrsJ. Dickens, Mr P. Soper. Programme: MrJ. Adams, Mr C. Baker, MrD. Green, MrD. Rands, Mrs M. Sheridan. Trustees (appointed under Rule 13): Mr M. Chandler, Mr D. Green, Mrs B.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report 1
    Sand pit for Biodiversity at Cep II quarry Researcher: Klára Řehounková Research group: Petr Bogusch, David Boukal, Milan Boukal, Lukáš Čížek, František Grycz, Petr Hesoun, Kamila Lencová, Anna Lepšová, Jan Máca, Pavel Marhoul, Klára Řehounková, Jiří Řehounek, Lenka Schmidtmayerová, Robert Tropek Březen – září 2012 Abstract We compared the effect of restoration status (technical reclamation, spontaneous succession, disturbed succession) on the communities of vascular plants and assemblages of arthropods in CEP II sand pit (T řebo ňsko region, SW part of the Czech Republic) to evaluate their biodiversity and conservation potential. We also studied the experimental restoration of psammophytic grasslands to compare the impact of two near-natural restoration methods (spontaneous and assisted succession) to establishment of target species. The sand pit comprises stages of 2 to 30 years since site abandonment with moisture gradient from wet to dry habitats. In all studied groups, i.e. vascular pants and arthropods, open spontaneously revegetated sites continuously disturbed by intensive recreation activities hosted the largest proportion of target and endangered species which occurred less in the more closed spontaneously revegetated sites and which were nearly absent in technically reclaimed sites. Out results provide clear evidence that the mosaics of spontaneously established forests habitats and open sand habitats are the most valuable stands from the conservation point of view. It has been documented that no expensive technical reclamations are needed to restore post-mining sites which can serve as secondary habitats for many endangered and declining species. The experimental restoration of rare and endangered plant communities seems to be efficient and promising method for a future large-scale restoration projects in abandoned sand pits.
    [Show full text]
  • (Fungi, Entomophthoromycota) Attacking Coleoptera with a Key for Their Identification
    Entomophthorales (Fungi, Entomophthoromycota) attacking Coleoptera with a key for their identification Autor(en): Keller, Siegfried Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft = Bulletin de la Société Entomologique Suisse = Journal of the Swiss Entomological Society Band (Jahr): 86 (2013) Heft 3-4 PDF erstellt am: 05.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-403074 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch MITTEILUNGEN DER SCHWEIZERISCHEN ENTOMOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT BULLETIN DE LA SOCIÉTÉ ENTOMOLOGIQUE SUISSE 86: 261-279.2013 Entomophthorales (Fungi, Entomophthoromycota) attacking Coleoptera with a key for their identification Siegfried Keller Rheinweg 14, CH-8264 Eschenz; siegfriedke@bluewin.ch A key to 30 species of entomophthoralean fungi is provided.
    [Show full text]
  • I Ohten Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Allgemeine Und Angewandte Entomologie E.V., Ulm 6
    i ohten Deutsche Gesellschaft für allgemeine und angewandte Entomologie e.V., Ulm 6. Jahrgang, Heft 1 ISSN 0931-4873 Februar 1992 INHALTSVERZEICHNIS AUS DEN ARBEITSKREISEN: AK "Nutzarthropoden", S. 2; AK "Dipteren", S. 13; Ankündigungen der AKe "Dipteren", S. 20; Einladung AK "Nutzarthropoden", S. 21; Einladung AK "Epigäische Raubarthropoden", S. 22; ÜBERSICHTEN ÜBER ENTOMOLOGISCHE ARBEITSGRUPPEN: Limnologische Flußstation Schlitz des MPI für Limnologie, S. 23; BITTE UM MITARBEIT (Staphylinidologen), S. 28; TAGUNGEN, S. 30; GESELLSCHAFTSNACHRICHTEN: Meigen-Medaille, S. 32; Neue Mitglieder, S. 37; Ehrenmitglieder, S. 38; Austritte 1991 und in 1991 ver- storbene Mitglieder, S. 38; Spendenbescheinigung, S. 39; Anschriftenänderun- gen; Mitgliedsbeiträge, Konten, Impressum, S. 40. !!! Studentische Mitglieder !!! Bitte unbedingt eine Studienbescheinigung an den Kassenwart senden, sofern nicht bereits im Wintersemester 1991/1992 geschehen. Wenn keine Studienbe- scheinigung vorliegt, muß der volle Mitgliedsbeitrag berechnet werden. Bitte beachten: Neue Anschrift des Kassenwartes: Dr. Paul Bernhard Koch Aligemeine Zoologie (Biologie I) Albert-Einstein-Allee 11 7900 Ulm Tel. 0731/502-2600, FAX 0731/502-2038 AUS DEN ARBEITSKREISEN Arbeitskreis "Nutzarthropoden" Die 10. Tagung des Arbeitskreises "Nutzarthropoden" fand am 18. und 19. Sep- tember 1991 im Landwirtschaftsamt, Karlsruhe-Durlach (Augustenberg) statt. Gastgeber waren Herr Amtsleiter A. BEEG und Herr P. DETZEL, Beratungsdienst "Nützlingseinsatz". Ungefähr 50 Kollegen nahmen Teil. Dabei wurden
    [Show full text]
  • Four Year Study Involving Wildlife Monitoring of Commercial SRC Plantations Planted on Arable Land and Arable Control Plots
    Four year study involving wildlife monitoring of commercial SRC plantations planted on arable land and arable control plots DTI TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMME: NEW AND RENEWABLE ENERGY CONTRACT NUMBER B/U1/00627/00/00 URN NUMBER 04/961 PROJECT REPORT The DTI drives our ambition of ’prosperity for all' by working to create the best environment for business success in the UK. We help people and companies become more productive by promoting enterprise, innovation and creativity. We champion UK business at home and abroad. We invest heavily in world-class science and technology. We protect the rights of working people and consumers. And we stand up for fair and open markets in the UK, Europe and the world. ii ARBRE MONITORING - ECOLOGY OF SHORT ROTATION COPPICE B/U1/00627/REP DTI/PUB URN 04/961 Contractor The Game Conservancy Trust (GCT) Sub-Contractor The Central Science Laboratory (CSL) Prepared by M.D.Cunningham (GCT) J.D. Bishop (CSL) H.V.McKay (CSL) R.B.Sage (GCT) The work described in this report was carried out under contract as part of the DTI Technology Programme: New and Renewable Energy. The views and judgements expressed in this report are those of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of the DTI. First published 2004 © Crown Copyright 2004 ii i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction This project, funded by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) through Future Energy Solutions, was conducted over a four-year period starting in 2000. The project involved wildlife monitoring within Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) plots managed commercially for the project ARBRE (Arable Biomass Renewable Energy) throughout Yorkshire.
    [Show full text]