DOCSLIB.ORG

Non-Interventional Study Protocol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Non-Interventional Study Protocol Global Clinical Epidemiology Non-interventional study protocol QVA149A2402 Title Multinational database cohort study to assess RMP specified safety outcomes in association with indacaterol/glycopyrronium bromide in Europe Protocol version v02 identifier Date of last version 02 June 2014 of protocol EU PAS register Study not registered number Active substance Indacaterol/glycopyrronium bromide (QVA149) (R03AL04) Medicinal product Ultibro® Breezhaler® Product reference QVA149 Procedure number EMEA/H/C/002679 Marketing Novartis Europharm Limited authorization Wimblehurst Road holder(s) Horsham West Sussex RH12 5AB United Kingdom Joint PASS No Novartis Confidential Page 2 Non-interventional study protocol QVA149/Ultibro®/ QVA149A2402 Research questions and objectives ...[redacted] Country (-ies) of The Netherlands, Spain, Denmark, Italy, United Kingdom study (UK) Author ...[redacted] 02 June 2014 QPPV or delegate Signature Date Property of Novartis Confidential May not be used, divulged, published or otherwise disclosed without the consent of Novartis NI Protocol Template Version 31-Jan-2013 Novartis Confidential Page 3 Non-interventional study protocol QVA149/Ultibro®/ QVA149A2402 1 Table of contents 1 Table of contents ............................................................................................................. 3 List of tables ................................................................................................................... 4 List of figures .................................................................................................................. 5 2 List of abbreviations ........................................................................................................ 6 3 Responsible parties ......................................................................................................... 8 4 Abstract ........................................................................................................................ 10 5 Amendments and updates .............................................................................................. 13 6 Milestones ..................................................................................................................... 14 7 Rationale and background ............................................................................................. 15 8 Research question and objectives .................................................................................. 16 8.1 Primary objectives ............................................................................................. 16 8.2 Secondary objectives ......................................................................................... 16 9 Research methods ......................................................................................................... 17 9.1 Study design ...................................................................................................... 17 9.2 Setting ............................................................................................................... 18 9.2.1 Study population and study cohorts .................................................... 18 9.2.2 Study period ...................................................................................... 19 9.2.3 In- and exclusion criteria .................................................................... 19 9.2.4 Follow-up .......................................................................................... 20 9.3 Variables ........................................................................................................... 22 9.3.1 Endpoints of interest .......................................................................... 22 9.3.2 Exposure of interest ........................................................................... 23 9.3.3 COPD and COPD severity ................................................................. 25 9.3.4 Past use of drugs and concomitant drug use ....................................... 26 9.3.5 Demography, life style factors and comorbidity ................................. 27 9.4 Data sources ...................................................................................................... 28 9.4.1 IPCI database ..................................................................................... 29 9.4.2 HSD database .................................................................................... 30 9.4.3 THIN database ................................................................................... 31 9.4.4 Aarhus database ................................................................................. 31 9.4.5 SIDIAP database ................................................................................ 32 9.5 Study size .......................................................................................................... 32 9.6 Data management .............................................................................................. 35 9.6.1 Identification of Unified Medical Language System® (UMLS®) concepts ............................................................................................. 35 Novartis Confidential Page 4 Non-interventional study protocol QVA149/Ultibro®/ QVA149A2402 9.6.2 Definition of data extraction algorithm ............................................... 35 9.6.3 Event data extraction.......................................................................... 36 9.6.4 Benchmarking of incidence rates of events......................................... 36 9.7 Data analysis...................................................................................................... 37 9.7.1 Yearly analysis for study progress reports .......................................... 37 9.7.2 Final analysis ..................................................................................... 37 9.8 Quality control ................................................................................................... 42 9.9 Limitations of the research methods ................................................................... 43 10 Protection of human subjects ......................................................................................... 44 11 Management and reporting of adverse events/adverse reactions..................................... 45 12 Plans for disseminating and communicating study results .............................................. 45 13 References (available upon request) .............................................................................. 45 Annex 1 - List of stand-alone documents.............................................................................. 49 Annex 2 - ENCePP checklist for study protocols .................................................................. 50 Annex 3 - Additional information ........................................................................................ 56 Annex 3.1 - Event definition ......................................................................................... 56 Annex 3.2 - Validation algorithm .................................................................................. 75 Annex 3.3 - Exposure definition .................................................................................. 101 Annex 3.4 - COPD definition ...................................................................................... 102 Annex 3.5 - Concomitant medication definition .......................................................... 105 Annex 3.6 - Comorbidity definition ............................................................................. 137 List of tables Table 3-1 Main responsible parties ...................................................................... 8 Table 5-1 Study protocol amendments and updates ............................................ 13 Table 6-1 Study milestones ................................................................................ 14 Table 9-1 Launch dates for QVA149 in the five participating countries ............. 19 Table 9-2 Overview of databases ....................................................................... 28 Table 9-3 Sample size and power calculation ..................................................... 33 Table 9-4 Population coverage (≥40 years of age) by individual database .......... 34 Table 9-5 Individual database estimates of QVA149 treated patients for the year 2017 ........................................................................................... 35 Novartis Confidential Page 5 Non-interventional study protocol QVA149/Ultibro®/ QVA149A2402 List of figures Figure 9-1 In- or exclusion in the study based on previous exposure of study drugs .................................................................................................. 20 Figure 9-2 Switching and add-on therapy ............................................................ 21 Figure 9-3 Eligibility to different exposure cohorts ............................................. 21 Figure 9-4 Creation of treatment episode for inhaled COPD therapies ................. 24 Figure 9-5 Identification of period of follow-up .................................................. 25 Figure 9-6 Model for data sharing and elaboration .............................................. 36 Figure 9-7 Different scenarios of follow-up for first episode of exposure ............ 41 Figure 9-8 Sensitivity analysis where complete follow-up of patients is used for the respective analysis .................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (AAV1-LPLS447X) Gene Therapy for Lipoprotein Lipase Deficiency
    Gene Therapy (2013) 20, 361–369 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0969-7128/13 www.nature.com/gt ORIGINAL ARTICLE Efficacy and long-term safety of alipogene tiparvovec (AAV1-LPLS447X) gene therapy for lipoprotein lipase deficiency: an open-label trial D Gaudet1,2,JMe´ thot1,2,SDe´ry1, D Brisson1,2, C Essiembre1, G Tremblay1, K Tremblay1,2, J de Wal3, J Twisk3, N van den Bulk3, V Sier-Ferreira3 and S van Deventer3 We describe the 2-year follow-up of an open-label trial (CT-AMT-011–01) of AAV1-LPLS447X gene therapy for lipoprotein lipase (LPL) deficiency (LPLD), an orphan disease associated with chylomicronemia, severe hypertriglyceridemia, metabolic complications and potentially life-threatening pancreatitis. The LPLS447X gene variant, in an adeno-associated viral vector of serotype 1 (alipogene tiparvovec), was administered to 14 adult LPLD patients with a prior history of pancreatitis. Primary objectives were to assess the long-term safety of alipogene tiparvovec and achieve a X40% reduction in fasting median plasma triglyceride (TG) at 3–12 weeks compared with baseline. Cohorts 1 (n ¼ 2) and 2 (n ¼ 4) received 3 Â 1011 gc kg À 1, and cohort 3 (n ¼ 8) received 1 Â 1012 gc kg À 1. Cohorts 2 and 3 also received immunosuppressants from the time of alipogene tiparvovec administration and continued for 12 weeks. Alipogene tiparvovec was well tolerated, without emerging safety concerns for 2 years. Half of the patients demonstrated a X40% reduction in fasting TG between 3 and 12 weeks. TG subsequently returned to baseline, although sustained LPLS447X expression and long-term changes in TG-rich lipoprotein characteristics were noted independently of the effect on fasting plasma TG.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicines Regulations 1984 (SR 1984/143)
    Reprint as at 1 July 2014 Medicines Regulations 1984 (SR 1984/143) David Beattie, Governor-General Order in Council At the Government House at Wellington this 5th day of June 1984 Present: His Excellency the Governor-General in Council Pursuant to section 105 of the Medicines Act 1981, and, in the case of Part 3 of the regulations, to section 62 of that Act, His Excellency the Governor-General, acting on the advice of the Minister of Health tendered after consultation with the organisations and bodies that ap- peared to the Minister to be representatives of persons likely to be substantially affected, and by and with the advice and consent of the Executive Council, hereby makes the following regulations. Contents Page 1 Title and commencement 5 Note Changes authorised by subpart 2 of Part 2 of the Legislation Act 2012 have been made in this official reprint. Note 4 at the end of this reprint provides a list of the amendments incorporated. These regulations are administered by the Ministry of Health. 1 Reprinted as at Medicines Regulations 1984 1 July 2014 2 Interpretation 5 Part 1 Classification of medicines 3 Classification of medicines 11 Part 2 Standards 4 Standards for medicines, related products, medical 11 devices, cosmetics, and surgical dressings 5 Pharmacist may dilute medicine in particular case 12 6 Colouring substances [Revoked] 12 Part 3 Advertisements 7 Advertisements not to claim official approval 13 8 Advertisements for medicines 13 9 Advertisements for related products 15 10 Advertisements for medical devices 15 11 Advertisements
    [Show full text]
  • The In¯Uence of Medication on Erectile Function
    International Journal of Impotence Research (1997) 9, 17±26 ß 1997 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0955-9930/97 $12.00 The in¯uence of medication on erectile function W Meinhardt1, RF Kropman2, P Vermeij3, AAB Lycklama aÁ Nijeholt4 and J Zwartendijk4 1Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2Department of Urology, Leyenburg Hospital, Leyweg 275, 2545 CH The Hague, The Netherlands; 3Pharmacy; and 4Department of Urology, Leiden University Hospital, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands Keywords: impotence; side-effect; antipsychotic; antihypertensive; physiology; erectile function Introduction stopped their antihypertensive treatment over a ®ve year period, because of side-effects on sexual function.5 In the drug registration procedures sexual Several physiological mechanisms are involved in function is not a major issue. This means that erectile function. A negative in¯uence of prescrip- knowledge of the problem is mainly dependent on tion-drugs on these mechanisms will not always case reports and the lists from side effect registries.6±8 come to the attention of the clinician, whereas a Another way of looking at the problem is drug causing priapism will rarely escape the atten- combining available data on mechanisms of action tion. of drugs with the knowledge of the physiological When erectile function is in¯uenced in a negative mechanisms involved in erectile function. The way compensation may occur. For example, age- advantage of this approach is that remedies may related penile sensory disorders may be compen- evolve from it. sated for by extra stimulation.1 Diminished in¯ux of In this paper we will discuss the subject in the blood will lead to a slower onset of the erection, but following order: may be accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Medicinal Drugs and Driving: Co-Ordination and Synthesis Report
    Project No. TREN-05-FP6TR-S07.61320-518404-DRUID DRUID Driving under the Influence of Drugs, Alcohol and Medicines Integrated Project 1.6. Sustainable Development, Global Change and Ecosystem 1.6.2: Sustainable Surface Transport 6th Framework Programme Deliverable 4.4.1 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Due date of deliverable: 21.07.2011 Actual submission date: 21.07.2011 Revision date: 21.07.2011 Start date of project: 15.10.2006 Duration: 48 months Organisation name of lead contractor for this deliverable: UVA Revision 0.0 Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme (2002-2006) Dissemination Level PU Public PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission x Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) DRUID 6th Framework Programme Deliverable D.4.4.1 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Page 1 of 243 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Authors Trinidad Gómez-Talegón, Inmaculada Fierro, M. Carmen Del Río, F. Javier Álvarez (UVa, University of Valladolid, Spain) Partners - Silvia Ravera, Susana Monteiro, Han de Gier (RUGPha, University of Groningen, the Netherlands) - Gertrude Van der Linden, Sara-Ann Legrand, Kristof Pil, Alain Verstraete (UGent, Ghent University, Belgium) - Michel Mallaret, Charles Mercier-Guyon, Isabelle Mercier-Guyon (UGren, University of Grenoble, Centre Regional de Pharmacovigilance, France) - Katerina Touliou (CERT-HIT, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Greece) - Michael Hei βing (BASt, Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen, Germany).
    [Show full text]
  • Dyslipidemia in Newfoundland: Findings from Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network in Newfoundland and Labrador
    Dyslipidemia in Newfoundland: Findings from Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network in Newfoundland and Labrador By Justin D. Oake A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Medicine Clinical Epidemiology Program, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John’s, NL May 2019 Abstract Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) has a higher level of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality than any other Canadian province. One factor which may explain this trend is the lipid profile pattern in this province. Given the limited lipid profile data which has been reported from NL, we organized three studies in this thesis to describe the lipid profile of Newfoundlanders. The first study was a secondary analysis of Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) data to document single and mixed dyslipidemia in NL. The second study compared lipid profiles and the prevalence of dyslipidemia between NL CPCSSN data and the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS). The third study used electronic medical record (EMR) data in assessing the validity of ICD codes for identifying patients with dyslipidemia. This was a secondary analysis of EMR data in NL. Most recent lipid profile scores, co-morbidities, and demographic information were extracted from the CPCSSN database. We demonstrated that single and mixed dyslipidemia are quite prevalent in the NL population. Unhealthy levels of HDL were also more prevalent in NL men, compared to the Canadian sample. Of importance, the use of the ICD coding, either alone or in combination with laboratory data or lipid-lowering medication records, was an inaccurate indicator in identifying dyslipidemia.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactions Medicamenteuses Index Des Classes Pharmaco
    INTERACTIONS MEDICAMENTEUSES INDEX DES CLASSES PHARMACO-THERAPEUTIQUES Mise à jour avril 2006 acides biliaires (acide chenodesoxycholique, acide ursodesoxycholique) acidifiants urinaires adrénaline (voie bucco-dentaire ou sous-cutanée) (adrenaline alcalinisants urinaires (acetazolamide, sodium (bicarbonate de), trometamol) alcaloïdes de l'ergot de seigle dopaminergiques (bromocriptine, cabergoline, lisuride, pergolide) alcaloïdes de l'ergot de seigle vasoconstricteurs (dihydroergotamine, ergotamine, methylergometrine) alginates (acide alginique, sodium et de trolamine (alginate de)) alphabloquants à visée urologique (alfuzosine, doxazosine, prazosine, tamsulosine, terazosine) amidons et gélatines (gelatine, hydroxyethylamidon, polygeline) aminosides (amikacine, dibekacine, gentamicine, isepamicine, kanamycine, netilmicine, streptomycine, tobramycine) amprénavir (et, par extrapolation, fosamprénavir) (amprenavir, fosamprenavir) analgésiques morphiniques agonistes (alfentanil, codeine, dextromoramide, dextropropoxyphene, dihydrocodeine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, pethidine, phenoperidine, remifentanil, sufentanil, tramadol) analgésiques morphiniques de palier II (codeine, dextropropoxyphene, dihydrocodeine, tramadol) analgésiques morphiniques de palier III (alfentanil, dextromoramide, fentanyl, hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, pethidine, phenoperidine, remifentanil, sufentanil) analogues de la somatostatine (lanreotide, octreotide) androgènes (danazol, norethandrolone, testosterone) anesthésiques volatils halogénés
    [Show full text]
  • Preventive Report Appendix
    Title Authors Published Journal Volume Issue Pages DOI Final Status Exclusion Reason Nasal sumatriptan is effective in treatment of migraine attacks in children: A Ahonen K.; Hamalainen ML.; Rantala H.; 2004 Neurology 62 6 883-7 10.1212/01.wnl.0000115105.05966.a7 Deemed irrelevant in initial screening Seasonal variation in migraine. Alstadhaug KB.; Salvesen R.; Bekkelund SI. Cephalalgia : an 2005 international journal 25 10 811-6 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2005.01018.x Deemed irrelevant in initial screening Flunarizine, a calcium channel blocker: a new prophylactic drug in migraine. Amery WK. 1983 Headache 23 2 70-4 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1983.hed2302070 Deemed irrelevant in initial screening Monoamine oxidase inhibitors in the control of migraine. Anthony M.; Lance JW. Proceedings of the 1970 Australian 7 45-7 Deemed irrelevant in initial screening Prostaglandins and prostaglandin receptor antagonism in migraine. Antonova M. 2013 Danish medical 60 5 B4635 Deemed irrelevant in initial screening Divalproex extended-release in adolescent migraine prophylaxis: results of a Apostol G.; Cady RK.; Laforet GA.; Robieson randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. WZ.; Olson E.; Abi-Saab WM.; Saltarelli M. 2008 Headache 48 7 1012-25 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01081.x Deemed irrelevant in initial screening Divalproex sodium extended-release for the prophylaxis of migraine headache in Apostol G.; Lewis DW.; Laforet GA.; adolescents: results of a stand-alone, long-term open-label safety study. Robieson WZ.; Fugate JM.; Abi-Saab WM.; 2009 Headache 49 1 45-53 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01279.x Deemed irrelevant in initial screening Safety and tolerability of divalproex sodium extended-release in the prophylaxis of Apostol G.; Pakalnis A.; Laforet GA.; migraine headaches: results of an open-label extension trial in adolescents.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Generic Substitution on Refill Adherence to Statin Therapy: a Nationwide Population-Based Study Henrik Trusell1 and Karolina Andersson Sundell1,2*
    Trusell and Andersson Sundell BMC Health Services Research 2014, 14:626 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/14/626 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Effects of generic substitution on refill adherence to statin therapy: a nationwide population-based study Henrik Trusell1 and Karolina Andersson Sundell1,2* Abstract Background: Several countries have introduced generic substitution, but few studies have assessed its effect on refill adherence. This study aimed to analyse whether generic substitution influences refill adherence to statin treatment. Methods: Between 1 July 2006 and 30 June 2007, new users of simvastatin (n = 108,806) and atorvastatin (n = 7,464) were identified in the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register . The present study included atorvastatin users as an unexposed control group because atorvastatin was patent-protected and thus not substitutable. We assessed refill adherence using continuous measure of medication acquisition (CMA). To control for potential confounders, we used analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Differences in CMA associated with generic substitution and generic substitution at first-time statin purchase were analysed. Results: Nine of ten simvastatin users were exposed to generic substitution during the study period, and their adherence rate was higher than that of patients without substitution [84.6% (95% CI 83.5-85.6) versus 59.9% (95% CI 58.4-61.4), p < 0.001]. CMA was higher with increasing age (60–69 years 16.7%, p < 0.0001 and 70–79 years 17.8%, p < 0.0001, compared to 18–39 years) and secondary prevention (12.8%, p < 0.0001). CMA was lower among patients who were exposed to generic substitution upon initial purchase, compared to those who were exposed to a generic substitution subsequently [80.4% (95% CI 79.4-90.9) versus 89.8% (88.7-90.9), p < 0.001].
    [Show full text]
  • 8Th European Congress on Epileptology, Berlin, Germany, 21 – 25 September 2008
    Epilepsia, 50(Suppl. 4): 2–262, 2009 doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02063.x 8th ECE PROCEEDINGS 8th European Congress on Epileptology, Berlin, Germany, 21 – 25 September 2008 Sunday 21 September 2008 KV7 channels (KV7.1-5) are encoded by five genes (KCNQ1-5). They have been identified in the last 10–15 years by discovering the caus- 14:30 – 16:00 ative genes for three autosomal dominant diseases: cardiac arrhythmia Hall 1 (long QT syndrome, KCNQ1), congenital deafness (KCNQ1 and KCNQ4), benign familial neonatal seizures (BFNS, KCNQ2 and VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS SATELLITE SYM- KCNQ3), and peripheral nerve hyperexcitability (PNH, KCNQ2). The fifth member of this gene family (KCNQ5) is not affected in a disease so POSIUM – NEURON-SPECIFIC M-CURRENT K+ CHAN- far. The phenotypic spectrum associated with KCNQ2 mutations is prob- NELS: A NEW TARGET IN MANAGING EPILEPSY ably broader than initially thought (i.e. not only BFNS), as patients with E. Perucca severe epilepsies and developmental delay, or with Rolando epilepsy University of Pavia, Italy have been described. With regard to the underlying molecular pathophys- iology, it has been shown that mutations in KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 Innovations in protein biology, coupled with genetic manipulations, have decrease the resulting K+ current thereby explaining the occurrence of defined the structure and function of many of the voltage- and ligand- epileptic seizures by membrane depolarization and increased neuronal gated ion channels, channel subunits, and receptors that are the underpin- firing. Very subtle changes restricted to subthreshold voltages are suffi- nings of neuronal hyperexcitability and epilepsy. Of the currently cient to cause BFNS which proves in a human disease model that this is available antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), no two act in the same way, but all the relevant voltage range for these channels to modulate the firing rate.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,603,526 B2 Tygesen Et Al
    USOO8603526B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,603,526 B2 Tygesen et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 10, 2013 (54) PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS 2008. O152595 A1 6/2008 Emigh et al. RESISTANT TO ABUSE 2008. O166407 A1 7/2008 Shalaby et al. 2008/0299.199 A1 12/2008 Bar-Shalom et al. 2008/0311205 A1 12/2008 Habib et al. (75) Inventors: Peter Holm Tygesen, Smoerum (DK); 2009/0022790 A1 1/2009 Flath et al. Jan Martin Oevergaard, Frederikssund 2010/0203129 A1 8/2010 Andersen et al. (DK); Karsten Lindhardt, Haslev (DK); 2010/0204259 A1 8/2010 Tygesen et al. Louise Inoka Lyhne-versen, Gentofte 2010/0239667 A1 9/2010 Hemmingsen et al. (DK); Martin Rex Olsen, Holbaek 2010, O291205 A1 11/2010 Downie et al. (DK); Anne-Mette Haahr, Birkeroed 2011 O159100 A1 6/2011 Andersen et al. (DK); Jacob Aas Hoellund-Jensen, FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Frederikssund (DK); Pemille Kristine Hoeyrup Hemmingsen, Bagsvaerd DE 20 2006 014131 1, 2007 (DK) EP O435,726 8, 1991 EP O493513 7, 1992 EP O406315 11, 1992 (73) Assignee: Egalet Ltd., London (GB) EP 1213014 6, 2002 WO WO 89,09066 10, 1989 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this WO WO91,040 15 4f1991 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 WO WO95/22962 8, 1995 U.S.C. 154(b) by 489 days. WO WO99,51208 10, 1999 WO WOOOf 41704 T 2000 WO WO 03/024426 3, 2003 (21) Appl. No.: 12/701,429 WO WOO3,O24429 3, 2003 WO WOO3,O24430 3, 2003 (22) Filed: Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,005,660 B2 Tygesen Et Al
    USOO9005660B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,005,660 B2 Tygesen et al. (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 14, 2015 (54) IMMEDIATE RELEASE COMPOSITION 4,873,080 A 10, 1989 Bricklet al. RESISTANT TO ABUSEBY INTAKE OF 4,892,742 A 1, 1990 Shah 4,898,733. A 2f1990 DePrince et al. ALCOHOL 5,019,396 A 5/1991 Ayer et al. 5,068,112 A 11/1991 Samejima et al. (75) Inventors: Peter Holm Tygesen, Smoerum (DK); 5,082,655 A 1/1992 Snipes et al. Jan Martin Oevergaard, Frederikssund 5,102,668 A 4, 1992 Eichel et al. 5,213,808 A 5/1993 Bar Shalom et al. (DK); Joakim Oestman, Lomma (SE) 5,266,331 A 11/1993 Oshlack et al. 5,281,420 A 1/1994 Kelmet al. (73) Assignee: Egalet Ltd., London (GB) 5,352.455 A 10, 1994 Robertson 5,411,745 A 5/1995 Oshlack et al. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 5,419,917 A 5/1995 Chen et al. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 5,422,123 A 6/1995 Conte et al. U.S.C. 154(b) by 473 days. 5,460,826 A 10, 1995 Merrill et al. 5,478,577 A 12/1995 Sackler et al. 5,508,042 A 4/1996 OShlack et al. (21) Appl. No.: 12/701.248 5,520,931 A 5/1996 Persson et al. 5,529,787 A 6/1996 Merrill et al. (22) Filed: Feb. 5, 2010 5,549,912 A 8, 1996 OShlack et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias
    Atherosclerosis 290 (2019) 140–205 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Atherosclerosis journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/atherosclerosis 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid ☆ T modification to reduce cardiovascular risk ∗ ∗∗ Authors/Task Force Members (François Macha, ,2, Colin Baigentb, ,2, ∗∗∗ Alberico L. Catapanoc, ,1,2, Konstantinos C. Koskinasd, Manuela Casulae,f,1, Lina Badimong, M. John Chapmanh,i,cm,1, Guy G. De Backerj, Victoria Delgadok, Brian A. Ferencel, Ian M. Grahamm, Alison Hallidayn, Ulf Landmessero,p,q, Borislava Mihaylovar,s, Terje R. Pedersent, Gabriele Riccardiu,1, Dimitrios J. Richterv, Marc S. Sabatinew, Marja-Riitta Taskinenx,1, Lale Tokgozogluy,1, Olov Wiklundz), ESC National Cardiac Societies (Djamaleddine Nibouchean, Parounak H. Zelveianao, Peter Siostrzonekap, Ruslan Najafovaq, Philippe van de Bornear, Belma Pojskicas, Arman Postadzhiyanat, Lambros Kyprisau, Jindřich Špinarav, Mogens Lytken Larsenaw, Hesham Salah Eldinax, Margus Viigimaaay, Timo E. Strandbergaz, Jean Ferrièresba, Rusudan Agladzebb, Ulrich Laufsbc, Loukianos Rallidisbd, László Bajnokbe, Thorbjörn Gudjónssonbf, Vincent Maherbg, Yaakov Henkinbh, Michele Massimo Guliziabi, Aisulu Mussagaliyevabj, Gani Bajraktaribk, Alina Kerimkulovabl, Gustavs Latkovskisbm, Omar Hamouibn, Rimvydas Slapikasbo, Laurent Visserbp, Philip Dinglibq, Victoria Ivanovbr, Aneta Boskovicbs, Mbarek Nazzibt, Frank Visserenbu, Irena Mitevskabv, Kjetil Retterstølbw, Piotr Jankowskibx, Ricardo Fontes-Carvalhoby, Dan Gaitabz, Marat Ezhovca,
    [Show full text]