DOCSLIB.ORG

The Possibility of the Existence of Mimicry Between Two Species of Southern Appalachian Salamanders

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Possibility of the Existence of Mimicry Between Two Species of Southern Appalachian Salamanders University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 3-1962 The Possibility of the Existence of Mimicry Between Two Species of Southern Appalachian Salamanders Lowell Preston Orr University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Orr, Lowell Preston, "The Possibility of the Existence of Mimicry Between Two Species of Southern Appalachian Salamanders. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 1962. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/3255 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Lowell Preston Orr entitled "The Possibility of the Existence of Mimicry Between Two Species of Southern Appalachian Salamanders." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in . J.T. Tanner, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) March 12, 1962 To the Graduate Council: � am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Lowell Preston Orr entitled "The Possibility of_ the Existence of Mimicry Between Two Species of Southern Appalachian Salamanders.�· I recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Zoology. We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance :· � :?ttZr.&'H� Accepted for the Council: \� /2� Dean of the Graduate School THE POSSIBILITY OF THE EXISTENCE OF MIMICRY BETWEEN TWO SPECIE S OF SOUTHERN AP PAlACHIAN SALAMANDERS A Dissertation Presented to The Graduate Ccmncil of The University of Tennessee In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Lowell Preston Orr March 1962 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am grateful to many individuals for their assistance in this study: Merlin Tuttle for his assistance in obtaining shrews used in the feeding experiments, M. T. Orr for advice and assistance in obtaining the photographs, and A. Stupka and N. J. Reid for permission to use the Great Smoky Mountains National Park facilities for the study. Stimulating comments and criticisms from R. E. Gordon, J. T. Wood, and J. E. Huheey were very much appreciated. I am especially indebted to Dr. J. T. Tanner, of the Zoology Department, University of Tennessee1 for his invaluable guidance and criticisms in d:irecting this problem. This investigation was supported in part by grants from the Tennessee Academy of Science and the Sigma Xi - RESA. Research Fund. ii 52541.9 TABLE OF CONTEN'IS SECTION PAGE I. DJ'ffi.ODUCTION . 1 II. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ••. • • • • • • • • • 9 The Theory of Mimicry • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 9 The Ecology and Speciation of D. o. carolinensis and f• j. jordani • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 13 III. THE REGION OF THE STUDY • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 19 IV. THE COIDR PATTERN OF ]2. Q. CAROLJNENSIS • • • • • • • • • 20 V. THE RANGES OF f.. �· JORDANI AND ]2. £. CAROLJNENSIS • • • • 32 Methods • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 32 Results • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 33 VI. DETERMJNATION OF THE RELATIVE· ABUNDANCE OF THE SUPPOSED MIMICS AND MODElS • • • • . • • • • • 4o Methods . 4o Description of the Transects • • • • • • • . 41 Results • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 44 VII. FEEDJNG EXPER lMEN TS. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 51 Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 51 Blarina brevicauda • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 58 GJ!inophilus danielsi danielsi and Desmognathus quadr·a-macula tus • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 64 Preliminary Feeding Experiments with Other Predators • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 65 iii iv SECTION PAGE VIII. DISCUSSION • • • • • • • • • 70 IX. SUMMARY • • • • • • 77 BIBLIOGRAPHY • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 80 LIST OF TABLES I. The Presence or Absence of �· i• jordani and �· £· carolinensis in Fourteen Areas of the Great Smoky Hountains National Park • • •• • • • . • • • 35 II. Records of Red-cheeked carolinensis Occurring Outside the Range of f• i• jordani • • • • • • • • • • • 37 III. Relative Abundance of jordani, Non-Mimetic carolinensis, and Mimetic carolinensis in Eight Transects • • 1' • • • ' . • • • • • 45 v LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1. Red-Cheeked Phase of Desmognathus ochrophaeus carolinensis Dunn ••• . • • 2 2. Plethodon jordani jordani Blatchley . � 3 3. Normal Color Pattern of Desmognathus ochrophaeus carolin�nsis Dunn • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • 4 4. Phylogeny of the Family Plethodontidae • . • . • • • • • • • 17 A Color Variant of n. o. carolinensis • • • • • • • • • • • • 22 . • . • . • • • • • 23 6. A Color Variant of D. £· carolinensis • • ?. A Color Variant of D. o. carolinensis • • • • • • • • • • • • 24 B. A Color Variant of D. o. carolinensis • • • • • . • • • • 25 - • 9. A Color Varifl,nt of -D. o. carolinensis • • • • • • • • • • • • 26 10. A Color Variant of D. o. carolinensis • • • • • • • • • • • • 27 11. A Color Variant of D. £• carolinensis • • • • . • • 28 12. A Color Variant of D. £• carolinensis • • • • • • • • • • • • 29 13. A Color Variant of D. £• carolinensis • • • • • • • • • • • • 30 14. Areas Sampled fo� �· i• jordani and D. o. carolinensis in the Great Smoky Mountains • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 34 15. Relative Aqundance of jordani and Red-Cheeked carolinensip • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 47 �6. Correlation between the Number of jordani in Transects ru1d the Per Cent of Red-Cheeked carolinensis in the Total carolinensis Population • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 50 vi rli FIGURE PAGE 17. Feeding Experiment Results of the Control Group of Thamnophis sirtalis • • • • • � • • • • • • • • • 56 18. Feeding Experiment Results of the Experimental Group of Thamnophis sirtalis • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 57 19. Feeding Experiment Results of the Control Group of Blarina brevicauda • • • • • . "62 20. Feeding �eriment Results of the Experimental • • • • 6 Group of Bla�ina brevicauda • • • • • • • • • • • • 3 I. INTRODUCTION Investigators familiar with the amphibia of the Great Smo� Mountains have long-·been puzzled by the amazing resemblance between the red, orange, or yellow-cheeked variants of the DesmognathI us ochrophaeus carolinensis Dunn population (Fig. 1) and the red-cheeked salamander, Plethodon jordani jordani Blatchley (Fig. 2). In �is study� these two species will be referred to by their sub-specific names, carolinensis and jordani. The problem is especially intri�ing in that the frequency of the red-cheeked variant in carolinensis ·is highest where this polymorphic species is sympatric with jordani in the pmok!es, Outside the range of jordani the incidence of the red cheek coloration among normally patterned carolinensis (Fig. 3) is quite lmv-. Numerous individuals have suggested that the similari�y ean be best explained in ter;ms of mimicry. According to the theory of mimicry, the two distantly related species ar e protected by having s.imila:r;- colpr patterns which ttadvertise11 to predators an undesirable characterist�c found in one or both of the species sharing the color pattern. TWo qasi� types of m.imicry have been proposed, In Batesian m.imicry, the red chi;:Jek patch of jordani could be considered warning or aposematic coloratiop which would 11advertise11 to predators some distasteful or unde-sirable quality found ill. jordani (the model). The red-cheeked variant of carol.inensis (the m�ic ), which exhibited pseudaposematic or .false warning coloratio� would thus gain survival value from its close 1 2 FIGURE 1 #. ' - RED-CHEEKED PHASE OF DESHOGNATHUS OCHROPHAEUS CAROLJNENSIS DUNN 3 r _,. FIGURE 2 PLETHOION JORDANI JORDANI BLATCHLEY FIGURE 3 NORMAL COLOR PATTERN OF DESMOGNATHUS OCHROPHAEUS CA ROLINENSIS, DUNN resemblance to the model even though it possessed none of the undesirable qualities. In Mullerian mimicry, both j ordani and the red-cheeked carolinensis would possess undesirable qualities and thus the model and the mimic �e both protected by undesirable characteristics. Although this problem has been recognized for over thirty-five years, no field research has been conducted to actually test the hypoth­ esis of mimicry between jordani and carolinensis. The purpose of this research project is to investigate the possibility that mimicry exists bett.reen these two species by both field and laboratory approaches. Dun� (1927) first described the yellow-cheeked variety of Desmognathus as a new mountain race and referred to it as Desmognathus fuscus imitator. Later (1928) Pope concluded from his studies that it vJas merely an unstable color variety of Desmognathus fuscus carolinensis. Bishop (1947), however, regarded it as a subspecies of Desmognathus ochrophaeus and assigned it its present status of Desmognathus ochrophaeus carolinensis. Attempts to account for this color variation have been made by several investigators.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spotted Salamander (Ambystoma Maculafum)
    Spotted Salamander (Ambystoma maculafum) RANGE: Nova Scotia and the Gaspe Peninsula to s. On- BREEDINGPERIOD: March to mid-April. Mass breeding tario, s. through Wisconsin, s. Illinois excluding prairie migrations occur in this species: individuals enter and regions, toe. Kansas andTexas, and through the Eastern leave breeding ponds using the same track each year, United States, except Florida, the Delmarva Peninsula, and exhibit fidelity to breeding ponds (Shoop 1956, and s. New Jersey. 1974). Individuals may not breed in consecutive years (Husting 1965). Breeding migrations occur during RELATIVE ABUNDANCEIN NEW ENGLAND:Common steady evening rainstorms. though populations declining, probably due to acid pre- cipitation. EGG DEPOSITION:1 to 6 days after first appearance of adults at ponds (Bishop 1941 : 114). HABITAT:Fossorial; found in moist woods, steambanks, beneath stones, logs, boards. Prefers deciduous or NO. EGGS/MASS:100 to 200 eggs, average of 125, laid in mixed woods on rocky hillsides and shallow woodland large masses of jelly, sometimes milky, attached to stems ponds or marshy pools that hold water through the sum- about 15 cm (6 inches) under water. Each female lays 1 to mer for breeding. Usually does not inhabit ponds con- 10 masses (average of 2 to 3) of eggs (Wright and Allen taining fish (Anderson 1967a). Terrestrial hibernator. In 1909).Woodward (1982)reported that females breeding summer often wanders far from water source. Found in in permanent ponds produced smaller, more numerous low oak-hickory forests with creeks and nearby swamps eggs than females using temporary ponds. in Illinois (Cagle 1942, cited in Smith 1961 :30).
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-Dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus Spp
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2005 The aN tural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia Michael Steven Osbourn Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Osbourn, Michael Steven, "The aN tural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia" (2005). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 735. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Natural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia. Thesis submitted to The Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Science Biological Sciences By Michael Steven Osbourn Thomas K. Pauley, Committee Chairperson Daniel K. Evans, PhD Thomas G. Jones, PhD Marshall University May 2005 Abstract The Natural History, Distribution, and Phenotypic Variation of Cave-dwelling Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus spp. Cope (Plethodontidae), in West Virginia. Michael S. Osbourn There are over 4000 documented caves in West Virginia, potentially providing refuge and habitat for a diversity of amphibians and reptiles. Spring Salamanders, Gyrinophilus porphyriticus, are among the most frequently encountered amphibians in caves. Surveys of 25 caves provided expanded distribution records and insight into ecology and diet of G.
    [Show full text]
  • Subterranean Reproduction of the Southern Two-Lined Salamander (Eurycea Cirrigera) from Short Mountain, Tennessee
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 2(2):106-112. Submitted: 15 April 2007; Accepted: 7 July 2007 SUBTERRANEAN REPRODUCTION OF THE SOUTHERN TWO-LINED SALAMANDER (EURYCEA CIRRIGERA) FROM SHORT MOUNTAIN, TENNESSEE 1,2 1 MATTHEW L. NIEMILLER AND BRIAN T. MILLER 1Department of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37132, USA 2Corresponding author/Present Address: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract.—The Southern Two-lined Salamander, Eurycea cirrigera, typically inhabits the margins of small, rocky streams, springs, and seeps in forested areas. The species is found only occasionally in subterranean habitats and, consequently, is considered a cave visitor (accidental or trogloxene). However, we discovered egg clutches in the deep cave zone of a subterranean stream during January and February 2005, indicating that some individuals are adapted to reproduce in caves. Eggs were attached singly to form monolayer masses on the undersurfaces of submerged rocks; females were found attending three of nine clutches. We determined the total number of eggs/clutch, mass surface area, egg and embryo size, and stage of development using digital images of each clutch. Embryo length correlated positively with developmental stage. Duration of embryonic period ranged from 35-42 days; consequently, eggs were laid from early to mid-January and larvae hatched from late February to early March. Adult males and females migrated into the cave to breed during late autumn. Males exited the cave after mating; whereas, females brooded their eggs and exited the cave only after eggs hatched. Larvae drifted downstream and out of the cave following heavy winter and early spring rains.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article Developing a Topographic Model to Predict The
    Research Article Developing a Topographic Model to Predict the Northern Hardwood Forest Type within Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus) Recovery Areas of the Southern Appalachians Andrew Evans,1 Richard Odom,2 Lynn Resler,3 W. Mark Ford,4 and Steve Prisley5 1 Department of Geography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77840, USA 2 Geospatial and Environmental Analysis Program, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA 3 Department of Geography, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA 4 DepartmentofFishandWildlifeConservation,VirginiaCooperativeFishandWildlifeResearchUnit,U.S.GeologicalSurvey, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA 5 Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA Correspondence should be addressed to W. Mark Ford; [email protected] Received 12 May 2014; Revised 14 July 2014; Accepted 18 July 2014; Published 28 August 2014 Academic Editor: Piermaria Corona Copyright © 2014 Andrew Evans et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The northern hardwood forest type is an important habitat component for the endangered Carolina northern flying squirrel (CNFS; Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus) for den sites and corridor habitats between boreo-montane conifer patches foraging areas. Our study related terrain data to presence of northern hardwood forest type in the recovery areas of CNFS in the southern Appalachian Mountains of western North Carolina, eastern Tennessee, and southwestern Virginia. We recorded overstory species composition and terrain variables at 338 points, to construct a robust, spatially predictive model.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Spring Salamander Fact Sheet
    WILDLIFE IN CONNECTICUT STATE THREATENED SPECIES © COURTESY D. QUINN © COURTESY Northern Spring Salamander Gyrinophilus p. porphyriticus Background and Range The northern spring salamander is a brightly-colored member of the lungless salamander family (Plethodontidae). True to its name, it resides in cool water springs and streams, making it an excellent indicator of a clean, well- oxygenated water source. Due to its strict habitat and clean water requirements, it is only found in a handful of locations within Connecticut. The Central Connecticut Lowlands divide this amphibian's range into distinct populations. Litchfield and Hartford Counties support the greatest populations of spring salamanders. This salamander is listed as a threatened species in Connecticut. In North America, the spring salamander occurs from extreme southeastern Canada south through New England, west to Ohio, and south down the Appalachians as far as northern Georgia and Alabama. Description This large, robust salamander ranges in color from salmon to reddish-brown to purplish-brown, with a translucent white underbelly. The snout appears “square” when viewed from above and the salamander has well-defined grooves near its eyes to its snout. The tail is laterally flattened with a fin-like tip. Young spring salamanders are lighter in color and have small gills. Their coloration does not have deeper reddish tints until adulthood. Total length ranges from 5 to 7.5 inches. Habitat and Diet Spring salamanders require very clean, cool, and well-oxygenated water. They can be found in streams, brooks, and seepage areas. Preferred habitat lies within steep, rocky hemlock forests. This species is intolerant to disturbances.
    [Show full text]
  • Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities
    Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities Alaska Aialik Bay Alaska Highway Alcan Highway Anchorage Arctic Auk Lake Cape Prince of Wales Castle Rock Chilkoot Pass Columbia Glacier Cook Inlet Copper River Cordova Curry Dawson Denali Denali National Park Eagle Fairbanks Five Finger Rapids Gastineau Channel Glacier Bay Glenn Highway Haines Harding Gateway Homer Hoonah Hurricane Gulch Inland Passage Inside Passage Isabel Pass Juneau Katmai National Monument Kenai Kenai Lake Kenai Peninsula Kenai River Kechikan Ketchikan Creek Kodiak Kodiak Island Kotzebue Lake Atlin Lake Bennett Latouche Lynn Canal Matanuska Valley McKinley Park Mendenhall Glacier Miles Canyon Montgomery Mount Blackburn Mount Dewey Mount McKinley Mount McKinley Park Mount O’Neal Mount Sanford Muir Glacier Nome North Slope Noyes Island Nushagak Opelika Palmer Petersburg Pribilof Island Resurrection Bay Richardson Highway Rocy Point St. Michael Sawtooth Mountain Sentinal Island Seward Sitka Sitka National Park Skagway Southeastern Alaska Stikine Rier Sulzer Summit Swift Current Taku Glacier Taku Inlet Taku Lodge Tanana Tanana River Tok Tunnel Mountain Valdez White Pass Whitehorse Wrangell Wrangell Narrow Yukon Yukon River General Views—no specific location Alabama Albany Albertville Alexander City Andalusia Anniston Ashford Athens Attalla Auburn Batesville Bessemer Birmingham Blue Lake Blue Springs Boaz Bobler’s Creek Boyles Brewton Bridgeport Camden Camp Hill Camp Rucker Carbon Hill Castleberry Centerville Centre Chapman Chattahoochee Valley Cheaha State Park Choctaw County
    [Show full text]
  • AMPHIBIANS of OHIO F I E L D G U I D E DIVISION of WILDLIFE INTRODUCTION
    AMPHIBIANS OF OHIO f i e l d g u i d e DIVISION OF WILDLIFE INTRODUCTION Amphibians are typically shy, secre- Unlike reptiles, their skin is not scaly. Amphibian eggs must remain moist if tive animals. While a few amphibians Nor do they have claws on their toes. they are to hatch. The eggs do not have are relatively large, most are small, deli- Most amphibians prefer to come out at shells but rather are covered with a jelly- cately attractive, and brightly colored. night. like substance. Amphibians lay eggs sin- That some of these more vulnerable spe- gly, in masses, or in strings in the water The young undergo what is known cies survive at all is cause for wonder. or in some other moist place. as metamorphosis. They pass through Nearly 200 million years ago, amphib- a larval, usually aquatic, stage before As with all Ohio wildlife, the only ians were the first creatures to emerge drastically changing form and becoming real threat to their continued existence from the seas to begin life on land. The adults. is habitat degradation and destruction. term amphibian comes from the Greek Only by conserving suitable habitat to- Ohio is fortunate in having many spe- amphi, which means dual, and bios, day will we enable future generations to cies of amphibians. Although generally meaning life. While it is true that many study and enjoy Ohio’s amphibians. inconspicuous most of the year, during amphibians live a double life — spend- the breeding season, especially follow- ing part of their lives in water and the ing a warm, early spring rain, amphib- rest on land — some never go into the ians appear in great numbers seemingly water and others never leave it.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Salamander (Gyrinophilus Porphyriticus) in Canada, Prepared Under Contract with Environment Canada
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Spring Salamander Gyrinophilus porphyriticus Adirondack / Appalachian population Carolinian population in Canada Adirondack / Appalachian population – THREATENED Carolinian population - EXTIRPATED 2011 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2011. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Spring Salamander, Adirondack / Appalachian and Carolinian populations Gyrinophilus porphyriticus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xiv + 52 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous report(s): COSEWIC. 2002. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Spring Salamander Gyrinophilus porphyriticus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 16 pp. Bonin, J. 1999. COSEWIC status report on the Spring Salamander Gyrinophilus porphyriticus in Canada in COSEWIC assessment and status report on the spring salamander Gyrinophilus porphyriticus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-16 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Anaïs Boutin for writing the status report on the Spring Salamander (Gyrinophilus porphyriticus) in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Ronald J. Brooks, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Amphibians and Reptiles Specialist Subcommittee For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le salamandre pourpre population des Adirondacks et des Appalaches et population carolinienne (Gyrinophilus porphyriticus) au Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian and Reptile Checklist
    KEY TO ABBREVIATIONS ___ Eastern Rat Snake (Pantherophis alleghaniensis) – BLUE RIDGE (NC‐C, VA‐C) Habitat: Varies from rocky timbered hillsides to flat farmland. The following codes refer to an animal’s abundance in ___ Eastern Hog‐nosed Snake (Heterodon platirhinos) – PARKWAY suitable habitat along the parkway, not the likelihood of (NC‐R, VA‐U) Habitat: Sandy or friable loam soil seeing it. Information on the abundance of each species habitats at lower elevation. AMPHIBIAN & comes from wildlife sightings reported by park staff and ___ Eastern Kingsnake (Lampropeltis getula) – (NC‐U, visitors, from other agencies, and from park research VA‐U) Habitat: Generalist at low elevations. reports. ___ Northern Mole Snake (Lampropeltis calligaster REPTILE C – COMMON rhombomaculata) – (VA‐R) Habitat: Mixed pine U – UNCOMMON forests and open fields under logs or boards. CHECKLIST R – RARE ___ Eastern Milk Snake (Lampropeltis triangulum) – (NC‐ U, VA‐U) Habitat: Woodlands, grassy balds, and * – LISTED – Any species federally or state listed as meadows. Endangered, Threatened, or of Special Concern. ___ Northern Water Snake (Nerodia sipedon sipedon) – (NC‐C, VA‐C) Habitat: Wetlands, streams, and lakes. Non‐native – species not historically present on the ___ Rough Green Snake (Opheodrys aestivus) – (NC‐R, parkway that have been introduced (usually by humans.) VA‐R) Habitat: Low elevation forests. ___ Smooth Green Snake (Opheodrys vernalis) – (VA‐R) NC – NORTH CAROLINA Habitat: Moist, open woodlands or herbaceous Blue Ridge Red Cope's Gray wetlands under fallen debris. Salamander Treefrog VA – VIRGINIA ___ Northern Pine Snake (Pituophis melanoleucus melanoleucus) – (VA‐R) Habitat: Abandoned fields If you see anything unusual while on the parkway, please and dry mountain ridges with sandier soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Zones in the Southern Appalachians: First Approximation
    United States Department of Ecological Zones in the Southern Agriculture Forest Service Appalachians: First Approximation Steve A. Simon, Thomas K. Collins, Southern Gary L. Kauffman, W. Henry McNab, and Research Station Christopher J. Ulrey Research Paper SRS–41 The Authors Steven A. Simon, Ecologist, USDA Forest Service, National Forests in North Carolina, Asheville, NC 28802; Thomas K. Collins, Geologist, USDA Forest Service, George Washington and Jefferson National Forests, Roanoke, VA 24019; Gary L. Kauffman, Botanist, USDA Forest Service, National Forests in North Carolina, Asheville, NC 28802; W. Henry McNab, Research Forester, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC 28806; and Christopher J. Ulrey, Vegetation Specialist, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Blue Ridge Parkway, Asheville, NC 28805. Cover Photos Ecological zones, regions of similar physical conditions and biological potential, are numerous and varied in the Southern Appalachian Mountains and are often typified by plant associations like the red spruce, Fraser fir, and northern hardwoods association found on the slopes of Mt. Mitchell (upper photo) and characteristic of high-elevation ecosystems in the region. Sites within ecological zones may be characterized by geologic formation, landform, aspect, and other physical variables that combine to form environments of varying temperature, moisture, and fertility, which are suitable to support characteristic species and forests, such as this Blue Ridge Parkway forest dominated by chestnut oak and pitch pine with an evergreen understory of mountain laurel (lower photo). DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement of any product or service by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL FORESTS /// the Southern Appalachians
    NATIONAL FORESTS /// the Southern Appalachians NORTH CAROLINA SOUTH CAROLINA, TENNESSEE » » « « « GEORGIA UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE National Forests in the Southern Appalachians UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OE AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE SOUTHERN REGION ATLANTA, GEORGIA MF-42 R.8 COVER PHOTO.—Lovely Lake Santeetlah in the iXantahala National Forest. In the misty Unicoi Mountains beyond the lake is located the Joyce Kilmer Memorial Forest. F-286647 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OEEICE WASHINGTON : 1940 F 386645 Power from national-forest waters: Streams whose watersheds are protected have a more even flow. I! Where Rivers Are Born Two GREAT ranges of mountains sweep southwestward through Ten­ nessee, the Carolinas, and Georgia. Centering largely in these mountains in the area where the boundaries of the four States converge are five national forests — the Cherokee, Pisgah, Nantahala, Chattahoochee, and Sumter. The more eastern of the ranges on the slopes of which thesefo rests lie is the Blue Ridge which rises abruptly out of the Piedmont country and forms the divide between waters flowing southeast and south into the Atlantic Ocean and northwest to the Tennessee River en route to the Gulf of Mexico. The southeastern slope of the ridge is cut deeply by the rivers which rush toward the plains, the top is rounded, and the northwestern slopes are gentle. Only a few of its peaks rise as much as a mile above the sea. The western range, roughly paralleling the Blue Ridge and connected to it by transverse ranges, is divided into segments by rivers born high on the slopes between the transverse ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Key to the Identification of Streamside Salamanders
    Key to the Identification of Streamside Salamanders Ambystoma spp., mole salamanders (Family Ambystomatidae) Appearance : Medium to large stocky salamanders. Large round heads with bulging eyes . Larvae are also stocky and have elaborate gills. Size: 3-8” (Total length). Spotted salamander, Ambystoma maculatum Habitat: Burrowers that spend much of their life below ground in terrestrial habitats. Some species, (e.g. marbled salamander) may be found under logs or other debris in riparian areas. All species breed in fishless isolated ponds or wetlands. Range: Statewide. Other: Five species in Georgia. This group includes some of the largest and most dramatically patterned terrestrial species. Marbled salamander, Ambystoma opacum Amphiuma spp., amphiuma (Family Amphiumidae) Appearance: Gray to black, eel-like bodies with four greatly reduced, non-functional legs (A). Size: up to 46” (Total length) Habitat: Lakes, ponds, ditches and canals, one species is found in deep pockets of mud along the Apalachicola River floodplains. A Range: Southern half of the state. Other: One species, the two-toed amphiuma ( A. means ), shown on the right, is known to occur in A. pholeter southern Georgia; a second species, ,Two-toed amphiuma, Amphiuma means may occur in extreme southwest Georgia, but has yet to be confirmed. The two-toed amphiuma (shown in photo) has two diminutive toes on each of the front limbs. Cryptobranchus alleganiensis , hellbender (Family Cryptobranchidae) Appearance: Very large, wrinkled salamander with eyes positioned laterally (A). Brown-gray in color with darker splotches Size: 12-29” (Total length) A Habitat: Large, rocky, fast-flowing streams. Often found beneath large rocks in shallow rapids. Range: Extreme northern Georgia only.
    [Show full text]