Special Report Concerning Certain Operations in 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Special Report Concerning Certain Operations in 2013 Special report concerning certain operations in 2013 Pursuant to section 162 of the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission Act 2011 November 2013 If you would like to receive this publication in an accessible Printed on Australian-made, 70–100 per cent post-consumer format, please phone IBAC’s Education and Communication Unit recycled, FSC (Forestry Stewardship Council) certifi ed, on 1300 735 135, using the National Relay Service 13 36 77 carbon-neutral paper by Kwik Kopy, William Street, Melbourne, if required, or email [email protected] Victoria 3008. This document may also be downloaded from the IBAC website Ordered to be printed by the Victorian Government Printer. at www.ibac.vic.gov.au November 2013 PP 287 Session 2010–13 Published by the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption ISBN 978-0-9923961-0-7 (print) Commission, Melbourne, Victoria. November 2013 ISBN 978-0-9923961-1-4 (online) © Copyright State of Victoria 2013 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. SPECIAL REPORT CONCERNING CERTAIN OPERATIONS IN 2013 Letter of transmittal To: The Honourable President of the Legislative Council The Honourable Speaker of the Legislative Assembly As foreshadowed in the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC) Annual Report 2012–13 tabled in Parliament in October 2013, this report dealing with certain IBAC operations in 2013 is presented to Parliament pursuant to section 162(1) of the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission Act 2011(Vic) (IBAC Act). The principal purpose of this report is to explain IBAC’s handling of various matters where most or all key events took place before IBAC took full jurisdiction in February 2013. Some of these were investigations that the Offi ce of the Police Integrity (OPI) was unable to complete by the time it ceased to exist in February 2013, and which IBAC decided it should complete. This report is otherwise desirable in the interests of transparency and, in relation to some matters, of fairness to persons publicly named as being the subject of a complaint to, or possible investigation by, IBAC. IBAC’s approach in this latter regard is described in Appendix A and relevant formal requirements prescribed for its special reporting in section 162 of the IBAC Act are addressed in Appendix B. Yours sincerely Stephen O’Bryan SC Commissioner www.ibac.vic.gov.au 01 This page has been left blank intentionally 02 SPECIAL REPORT CONCERNING CERTAIN OPERATIONS IN 2013 Contents Letter of transmittal 01 4. Conclusion 21 1. Introduction 05 5. Appendices 22 Appendix A 22 07 2. IBAC’s early operations Appendix B 23 Building the organisation 07 Appendix C 24 The new integrity legislation 07 Appendix D 25 IBAC’s role 07 Protected disclosure guidelines and training 08 Abbreviations 26 New investigations 08 Own motion investigation into deaths or serious injury associated with police contact 09 Victoria Police Taskforce Keel 09 Information provided to IBAC by the Hon Ted Baillieu MP 10 Notifi cation to IBAC under section 16E of the Ombudsman Act 1973, concerning the Hon Matthew Guy MLC 11 3. OPI related matters 13 Investigation concerning alleged misconduct within the Mounted Police 13 Investigation concerning complaint to OPI by Theo Theophanous 13 Investigation concerning complaint against OPI and Victoria Police by Noel Ashby APM and Paul Mullett APM 16 Ombudsman’s report to IBAC concerning OPI’s investigation into Sir Ken Jones QPM 18 Investigation into police conduct which caused the premature collapse of a serious drugs-related prosecution 20 www.ibac.vic.gov.au 03 This page has been left blank intentionally 04 SPECIAL REPORT CONCERNING CERTAIN OPERATIONS IN 2013 1. Introduction This report addresses certain matters IBAC has dealt • the results of direct notifi cations by other agencies with since it became fully operational on 10 February or information received from government since IBAC 2013, some of which were taken over by IBAC from assumed its full powers and which have been the OPI when it ceased to exist on the same date. subject of public commentary It is timely that IBAC demonstrates to Parliament and • a number of ‘legacy’ matters in which IBAC the public that it has acted – and is acting – upon has completed sensitive and complex matters the meaning and intent of relevant legislation1, both commenced by the former OPI or where OPI in respect of matters fi rst taken up by OPI and otherwise had some involvement. Most of these subsequently addressed by IBAC, and of matters cases, involving allegations of police misconduct, that have arisen since IBAC assumed its powers. have previously been the subject of signifi cant public comment and interest. Accordingly, this report addresses the following matters: Importantly, this report foreshadows outcomes from a • IBAC’s early operations, and in particular some of number of investigations in the police and public sector the organisational, legislative, operational and other jurisdictions commenced since IBAC assumed full powers issues facing the Commission in February 2013. This report notes that at present, IBAC’s police and other public sector investigations • a standing ‘own motion’ investigation that IBAC are roughly even in number. has commenced into deaths or serious injury (or risk thereof) associated with police contact Finally, this report underscores the determination • IBAC’s response to the announcement of Taskforce of IBAC to build a reputation for professionalism, Keel, a Victoria Police investigation to explore links adherence to both the spirit and letter of the legislation between some police personnel and criminal elements passed by Parliament, and respect and responsiveness including, in particular, members of outlaw motor in its dealings with clients and stakeholders, in particular cycle gangs the Victorian public. 1 Especially the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission Act 2011 and Protected Disclosure Act 2012. www.ibac.vic.gov.au 05 This page has been left blank intentionally 06 SPECIAL REPORT CONCERNING CERTAIN OPERATIONS IN 2013 2. IBAC’s early operations Building the organisation The new integrity legislation As a new organisation, a particular early priority for During 2013, IBAC and other Victorian agencies have IBAC has been to establish and build the organisation, been navigating new and complex integrity scheme with strong executive leadership, management capacity legislation, which involves fully understanding and and technical expertise, as well as sound organisational making the legislation work in practice. IBAC intends to structure, systems, policies and practices. further report to Parliament on important aspects of its interpretation and application of the legislation after In this respect, the establishment of IBAC has been a IBAC’s fi rst twelve months of full operation4. This will mix of start-up activity for a new organisation, as well include a detailed update about the performance as change management in transitioning resources, of IBAC’s important prevention and education role. in particular many staff from OPI. IBAC has taken a deliberately measured approach to recruitment and other establishment activities. IBAC’s role Strong organisational foundations for IBAC will benefi t It is timely to clear up possible misunderstandings the State of Victoria into the future and patience is concerning the fact that IBAC only investigates a small required to see its potential fulfi lled. As recently noted proportion of the many complaints from the public and by the Chief Commissioner of the Integrity Commission notifi cations from other statutory bodies that it receives. in Tasmania, interstate experience demonstrates that IBAC assesses all complaints and notifi cations on it takes time to establish a new organisation like IBAC, their merits. IBAC will only commence an investigation with a new and broad jurisdiction. Moreover, it is diffi cult when the subject matter involves credible allegations or to make comparisons at this stage of IBAC’s operations evidence of serious misconduct within Victoria Police, with the performance of anti-corruption agencies in or of serious corrupt conduct in the public sector. Other NSW and Queensland, which have decades of complaints and notifi cations of police or public sector experience to draw on, and which have differing powers misconduct are able to be referred by IBAC to other and jurisdictions2. In a similar vein, the federal Integrity integrity, statutory or law enforcement bodies5. IBAC’s Commissioner recently observed in his annual report powers, expertise and resources are appropriately that ‘it takes perhaps a decade to embed an effective focused on investigating the more serious matters, integrity system’3. as well as its other functions6. The organisational performance of IBAC will be covered This approach is consistent with IBAC’s role as in further special reports, and in statutory annual reporting Victoria’s central integrity agency and the approach of following the end of each fi nancial year, as well as in its interstate counterparts7. In receiving and assessing fulfi lling specifi c statutory reporting obligations to a wide range of complaints and notifi cations, IBAC the Victorian Inspectorate (VI). plays an important ‘clearing house’ role in collecting comprehensive information on potential corruption issues and risks facing the public sector. This information and intelligence may inform prevention and education functions,
Recommended publications
  • Investigation Into Allegations of Detrimental Action Involving Victoria Police
    VICTORIAN Investigation into allegations of Whistleblowers Protection detrimental action involving Victoria Police Act 2001 June 2012 Ordered to be printed Victorian government printer Session 2010 - 12 P.P. No. 152 www.ombudsman.vic.gov.au Letter to the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly To The Honourable the President of the Legislative Council and The Honourable the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly Pursuant to section 103 of the Whistleblowers Protection Act 2001, I present to Parliament my report of an investigation into allegations of detrimental action involving Victoria Police. G E Brouwer OMBUDSMAN 20 June 2012 letter to the legislative council and the legislative assembly 1 www.ombudsman.vic.gov.au Contents Page Section 22A statement 3 The disclosure 5 Summary of conclusions 6 The investigation 6 Background 8 The lead up to Mr Jones’ departure 9 Relations between Mr Overland and Mr Jones 9 Mr Jones’ intention to resign from Victoria Police 10 Allegation of ‘serious misconduct’ against Mr Jones 13 Conversation between Mr Fryer and Mr McKenzie 13 Meeting between Victoria Police executive about Mr Jones and the media leak 15 The detrimental action allegations 18 Allegation 1 – Undermining IBAC appointment 18 Allegation 2 – Gardening leave 19 Decision to send Mr Jones on leave 22 Immediate departure of Mr Jones 25 Allegation 3 – Public statement to discredit Mr Jones 26 Did Mr Overland believe Mr Jones to be a whistleblower? 27 Was action taken in reprisal for Mr Jones’ perceived whistleblower status? 28 Conclusions 30 Further allegation 31 Recommendation 31 Appendix 1 – Emails between Mr Overland and Mr Jones on parolees 32 2 investigation into allegations of detrimental action involving victoria police www.ombudsman.vic.gov.au Section 22A statement 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Vpl.0099.0047.0003 Vpl.0099.0047.0001 E1 P
    VPL.0099.0047.0003 VPL.0099.0047.0001_E1_P Chief Commissioner Ken Lay Victoria Police Victoria Police Centre Level 10, 637 Flinders Street Melbourne 3000 Dear Chief Commissioner Lay, As requested, I have undertaken a review of the human source 3838 matter consistent with the terms of reference provided which required my consideration of: 1. The adequacy of existing human source policies, procedures, instructions and control measures, including actual management and operational practices utilised, having regard to the particular professional standing of 3838, and 2. The process and associated issues whereby a human source may transition to become a witness including the adequacy of controls and risk recognition arrangements and mitigation for such instances. In order to conduct this 3838 review Victoria Police provided me with the full­ time assistance of Superintendent Steve Gleeson and he conducted a variety of inquiries on my behalf. The review process entailed: An electronic review of the full Interpose file for 3838 and for For security reasons, in January 2008, 3838's informer registration number was changed to 2958 - (lt should be to confusion the reference number 3838 is utilised throughout this review). Consideration of the Human Source related policy, instructions and guidelines current when 3838 was registered (September 2005). Consideration of the revised Human Source related policy, instructions and guidelines which were issued on 22 Februaty 2010 and remain current. Consideration of a draft Victoria Police Human Source Practice Guide which remains under development and is yet to be formally approved or released. e Consultation with key personnel including the then, and current, SOU management, HSMU management, Witness Security Group (WITSEC) management and with Interpose program managers and practitioners.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Scandal Rocks Baillieu Josh Gordon and David Rood October 28, 2011
    Police scandal rocks Baillieu Josh Gordon and David Rood October 28, 2011 THE Baillieu government has been rocked by the exposure of a secret plot from within the office of the Deputy Premier to oust former police commissioner Simon Overland. The explosive revelations, contained in a report from the Office of Police Integrity, yesterday forced the resignation of a junior minister and a key police adviser to the government. The report has also placed Deputy Premier and Police Minister Peter Ryan at the centre of the most damaging scandal to hit Premier Ted Baillieu in his 11 months in office, and under intense political pressure. Advertisement: Story continues below Mr Ryan insisted he had ''absolutely no idea'' that his police adviser, Tristan Weston, had been running a destructive and machiavellian campaign of leaks against Mr Overland. The Office of Police Integrity probe also found that Mr Ryan's ministerial understudy, parliamentary secretary for police Bill Tilley, was complicit in the plot. Mr Tilley and Mr Weston - an ex-police officer who was hand-picked by Mr Ryan after failing as a Liberal candidate at the 2010 election - both resigned yesterday after the OPI report was tabled in Parliament. The report, by OPI director Michael Strong, also canvassed whether the admissible evidence would justify criminal charges against Mr Weston. The report said Mr Weston had pursued his own political agenda with ''no sense of boundaries'', releasing often unfounded and misleading leaks that played a direct role in Mr Overland's decision to quit in June. ''Having failed to gain parliamentary office, [Mr Weston] found himself in a position of power and influence … and he simply did not know where to draw the line, or much care,'' the report said.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report Concerning Allegations About the Conduct of Sir Ken Jones QPM in Relation to His Dealings with Certain Confidential Victoria Police Information
    Special report concerning allegations about the conduct of Sir Ken Jones QPM in relation to his dealings with certain confidential Victoria Police information Pursuant to section 162 of the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission Act 2 011 February 2014 WARNING – Confidential information This report contains information obtained or received under the Whistleblowers Protection Act 2001 (Vic) (WP Act) to which section 81(1) of the Protected Disclosure Act 2012 (Vic) (PD Act) applies. It is an offence for a person to disclose such information, except as provided in section 81(3) of the PD Act. Recipients should be aware of the provisions of the PD Act. WARNING – Transferred restricted matter This report contains information known as ‘transferred restricted matter’ as defined in section 183(6) of the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission Act 2011 (Vic) (IBAC Act). Such information has been obtained pursuant to provisions of the (now repealed) Police Integrity Act 2008 (Vic) (PI Act). It is an offence to disclose transferred restricted matter except as permitted by section 183 of the IBAC Act. Recipients should be aware of the provisions of the IBAC Act. WARNING – Lawfully intercepted information This report contains ‘lawfully intercepted information’ within the meaning of section 6E of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (Cth) (TIA Act). It is an offence to communicate to another person, make use of, or make a record of this information except as permitted by the TIA Act. Recipients should be aware of the provisions of the Act. If you would like to receive this publication in an accessible Printed on Australian-made, 70–100 per cent post-consumer format, please phone IBAC’s Education and Communications Unit recycled, FSC (Forestry Stewardship Council) certified, on 1300 735 135, using the National Relay Service 13 36 77 carbon-neutral paper by Kwik Kopy, William Street, if required, or email [email protected] Melbourne, Victoria 3008.
    [Show full text]
  • Vpl.0014.0121.0001 Vpl.0014.0121.0001 R1 Vpl.0014.0121.0001 R1 P
    VPL.0014.0121.0001 VPL.0014.0121.0001_R1 VPL.0014.0121.0001_R1_P Royal Commission into the Management of Police lnformants STATEMENT OF TIMOTHY JOHN CARTWRIGHT 1. My full name is Timothy John Cartwright. I am presently a self-employed consultant. 2. I make this statement in response to a request from the Royal Commission into the Management of Police Informants. This statement is produced to the Royal Commission in response to a Notice to Produce. 3. in the course of preparing this statement, I had access to my diaries, emails and various documents shown to me by my legal representatives Detail your educational background and employment history, including progression through the ranks and roles assigned (Q1) 4. I joined Victoria Police in 1974. Most of my early career was spent in the northern and western suburbs of Melbourne in operational roles in uniform, plain clothes, and as a detective. 5. I was promoted to Inspector in 1990, Chief inspector in 1995, and Superintendent in 2000, I served in a number of policy roles as an Officer, undertook and led a number of significant organisational reform projects, and spent time on assignment in Scotland. 6. Between 2003 and 2008, 1 carried out the role of Divisional Superintendent in the CBD and Divisions in the north and west of Melbourne. The divisions varied in size between 250 and 700 employees. 7. In late 2008, I was appointed Assistant Commissioner, serving as a Regional Assistant Commissioner in two Regions between 2008 and mid-2011. The regions varied in size from between 1400 and 2700 employees.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Commission Into the Management of Police Informants Final Report Volume III
    Final Report Volume III NOVEMBER 2020 Royal Commission into the Management of Police Informants Final Report Volume III The Honourable Margaret McMurdo, AC Commissioner ORDERED TO BE PUBLISHED Victorian Government Printer November 2020 PP No. 175, Session 2018–2020 Final Report: Volume III 978-0-6485592-3-8 Published November 2020 ISBN: Volume I 978-0-6485592-1-4 Volume II 978-0-6485592-2-1 Volume III 978-0-6485592-3-8 Volume IV 978-0-6485592-4-5 Summary and Recommendations 978-0-6485592-5-2 Suggested citation: Royal Commission into the Management of Police Informants (Final Report, November 2020). Contents Chapter 10: Victoria Police’s use of other human sources with legal obligations of confidentiality or privilege 4 Chapter 11: Victoria Police’s implementation of the Kellam Report recommendations 34 Chapter 12: Victoria Police’s processes for the use and management of human sources involving legal 79 obligations of confidentiality or privilege Chapter 13: External oversight of Victoria Police’s use of human sources 183 10 Victoria Police’s use of other human sources with legal obligations of confidentiality or privilege INTRODUCTION In January 2019, the Commission obtained a copy of a letter from Victoria Police to the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC) regarding its identification of seven human source files that required an assessment to determine whether there had been ‘any possible breaches of legal professional privilege’.1 Those files related to people in occupations associated with the legal profession. The disclosure prompted an amendment to the Commission’s Letters Patent, to extend the scope of its terms of reference to inquire into Victoria Police’s use of human sources, other than Ms Nicola Gobbo, with legal obligations confidentiality or privilege.2 Term of reference 5 required the Commission to recommend any measures that may be taken to address: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Vpl.0014.0119.0001
    VPL.0014.0119.0001 Royal Commission into the Management of Police lnformants STATEMENT OF KENNETH DOUGLAS LAY A0 1. My full name is Kenneth Douglas Lay A0. 2. | make this statement in response to a request from the Royal Commission into the Management of Police Informants. This statement is produced to the Royal Commission in response to a Notice to Produce. Questions 1-2 Detail your educational background and employment history, including progression through the ranks and roles assigned (Q1) 3. l was the Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police for just over three years, from 14 November 2011 to 31 January 2015. I replaced Simon Overland. I resigned from the role due to a family health issue. I was succeeded by the current Chief Commissioner, Graham Ashton. 4. Prior to becoming the Chief Commissioner, I was the Acting Chief Commissioner for about 5 months from 16 June 2011 to 13 November 2011. 5. The Chief Commissioner is the Chief Executive Officer of Victoria Police and is responsible for the management and control of the organisation. The role includes implementing the policing policy and priorities of the Government and providing advice and information to the Minister on the operations of the organisation and policing matters generally. The Chief Commissioner is responsible to the Minister for the general conduct, performance and operations of Victoria Police. 6. Immediately prior to being the Acting Chief Commissioner, I was a Deputy Commissioner and prior to that an Assistant Commissioner. My responsibilities were road policing/traffic and strategy and development and, for part of this time, l was responsible for Region 3, based in Broadmeadows.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Review
    INDEPENDENT REVIEW into sex discrimination and sexual harassment, including predatory behaviour in Victoria Police Phase One Report I 2015 Published by the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission, Level 3, 204 Lygon Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053. December 2015. Contact us Enquiry Line 1300 292 153 or (03) 9032 3583 Fax 1300 891 858 Hearing impaired (TTY) 1300 289 621 Interpreters 1300 152 494 Email [email protected] Website www.humanrightscommission.vic.gov.au Independent review into sex discrimination and sexual harassment, including predatory behaviour Copyright © State of Victoria 2015 This publication is copyright. No part of it may be reproduced by any process except with permission from the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission (the Commission) or in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. On request the Commission may give permission for this material to be reproduced provided it is for a purpose consistent with the objectives of the Equal Opportunity Act 2010 and the Commission is acknowledged as the source. Contact [email protected] for permission to reproduce material from the publication. Accessible formats This document is available for downloading from our website at www.humanrightscommission.vic.gov. au/resources in PDF and RTF. Please contact the Commission if you require other accessible formats. Privacy The Commission complies with Victorian privacy laws and the confidentiality provisions of the Equal Opportunity Act. Our privacy policy is available online
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into the Command, Management and Functions of the Senior Structure of Victoria Police
    Inquiry into the command, management and functions of the senior structure of Victoria Police Inquiry into the command, management and functions of the senior structure of Victoria Police The Victorian Government has vested the State Services Authority with functions designed to foster the development of an efficient, integrated and responsive public sector which is highly ethical, accountable and professional in the ways it delivers services to the Victorian community. The key functions of the Authority are to: identify opportunities to improve the delivery and integration of government services and report on service delivery outcomes and standards; promote high standards of integrity and conduct in the public sector; strengthen the professionalism and adaptability of the public sector; and promote high standards of governance, accountability and performance for public entities. The Authority seeks to achieve its charter by working closely and collaboratively with public sector departments and agencies. contact us at the State Services Authority Email: [email protected] Phone: (03) 9651 1321 Fax: (03) 9651 0747 Postal Address: 3 Treasury Place Melbourne 3002 www.ssa.vic.gov.au © Copyright State Government of Victoria State Services Authority November 2011 contents abbreviations v executive summary vii 1 introduction 1 1.1 Inquiry approach 1 1.2 background to the Inquiry 2 1.3 recent reports and research 2 1.4 themes 3 2 Victoria Police overview 4 2.1 role 4 2.2 legislative overview 4 2.3 funding 6 2.4 workforce 7 2.5 regions 8
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Has Been Redacted for Public Interest Immunity Claims Made by Victoria Police
    SUB.0021.0001.0001 0001 SUB.0021.0001.0001 R1 This document has been redacted for Public Interest Immunity claims made by Victoria Police. These claims are not yet resolved. Peter Fintan Lalor Submission to Royal Commission into Police Management of Informants Commissioner PREAMBLE 1, My full name is Peter Fintan Lalor, I was in full tirne employment of Victoria Police as a sworn operational member from 1977 until my resignation in 2009. When I resigned, I was a Detective Sergeant stationed at Prahran CIB. I had formerly served in the Major Crime Squad, Armed Robbery Squad, and St Kilda CIB. 2. I am currently setf-employed. 4, I am making this submission because I believe the course of justice was perverted by the misuse and manipulation of police informers resulting in: (a) A number of innocent people having their reputations wrongfully destroyed, (b) A dangerous criminal will be released back into the community earlier than he should be, (c) The family of a murder victim has not seen justice as the killer of their son remains free, and (d) Those responsible for these injustices have not been held to account 5. On or about 2006,1 along with David Waters became the target of a Police Investigation into the murder of Shane Chartres Abbott. The investigation was the subject of Operation Briars and largely centred on the testimony of “^Gregory violent career criminal with a long history of providing unreliable evidence. 6. It is my submission that Operation Briars was overseen and used by a group of individuals led by Simon Overland to pursue an agenda that was totally Inimical to the interests of justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Full Text CLIFFORD Double-Sided
    University of Canberra ! ! ! The Thin Blue Line of Mental Health: Mediated Representations of Police Use of Force in Mental Health Crisis Interventions By Katrina Clifford A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Communication) at the University of Canberra December 2012 Abstract This research examines the ways in which police officers and bereaved family members make sense of their lived experience of the fatal police-involved shooting of a mentally ill individual in crisis in the context of news media representations of these critical incidents. Fatal mental health crisis interventions are – by virtue of their circumstances – highly controversial and subject to different, often competing, interpretations between key stakeholders. This research adopts a critical realist approach to identify and explore these divergent interpretive frameworks in the context of ‘risk communication’ (Blood, Pirkis & Francis, 2004). It examines the ways in which police use of lethal force is typically framed in news media coverage of fatal mental health crisis interventions, and the media’s contribution to public understandings of contemporary policing and mental illness. Central to this is a qualitative interpretive framing analysis of the news media coverage of the fatal police-involved shooting of a mentally ill man, Paul Klein, on the south coast of New South Wales, Australia, in May 1998. A critique of the news frames constructed by print and broadcast news media is offered in relation to the personal
    [Show full text]
  • Police and Emergency Services 253.36 Kb
    VERIFIED TRANSCRIPT PUBLIC ACCOUNTS AND ESTIMATES COMMITTEE Inquiry into budget estimates 2010–11 Melbourne — 14 May 2010 Members Mr R. Dalla-Riva Mr G. Rich-Phillips Ms J. Graley Mr R. Scott Ms J. Huppert Mr B. Stensholt Mr W. Noonan Dr W. Sykes Ms S. Pennicuik Mr K. Wells Chair: Mr B. Stensholt Deputy Chair: Mr K. Wells Staff Executive Officer: Ms V. Cheong Witnesses Mr B. Cameron, Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Ms P. Armytage, Secretary, Mr T. Leech, Executive Director, Police, Emergency Services and Corrections, Department of Justice; and Chief Commissioner S. Overland, Victoria Police. 14 May 2010 Police and Emergency Services portfolio M1 The CHAIR — I declare open the Public Accounts and Estimates Committee hearing on the 2010-11 budget estimates for the portfolios of police and emergency services. On behalf of the committee I welcome the Honourable Bob Cameron, MP, Minister for Police and Emergency Services; Ms Penny Armytage, Secretary of the Department of Justice; Mr Tony Leech, executive director, police, emergency services and corrections; Mr Simon Overland, APM, Chief Commissioner of Victoria Police; departmental officers, members of the public and the media are also welcome. In accordance with the guidelines for public hearings, I remind members of the public that they cannot participate in the committee’s proceedings. Only officers of the PAEC secretariat are to approach PAEC members. Departmental officers, as requested by the minister or his/her chief of staff, can approach the table during the hearing. Members of the media are also requested to observe the guidelines for filming or recording proceedings in the Legislative Council committee room; they are specifically that the filming is confined to those people who are speaking.
    [Show full text]