DOCSLIB.ORG

Boise Interagency Fire Danger Operating Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Boise Interagency Fire Danger Operating Plan Boise Interagency Fire Danger Operating Plan March 2021 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK Boise Interagency Fire Danger Operating Plan Approved By: Agency Administrators Digitally signed by TANYA TANYA THRIFT THRIFT Date: 2021.03.29 12:45:09 -06'00' Tanya Thrift - Acting Boise District Manager Date Bureau of Land Management, Boise District Office Bob Pietras - Southwest Area Manager Date Idaho Department of Lands, Southwest Idaho Tawnya Brummett – Forest Supervisor Date US Forest Service, Boise National Forest Boise Interagency Fire Danger Operating Plan Approved By: Agency Administrators Tanya Thrift - Acting Boise District Manager Date Bureau of Land Management, Boise District Office 03/23/2021 Bob Pietras - Southwest Area Manager Date Idaho Department of Lands, Southwest Idaho Tawnya Brummett – Forest Supervisor Date US Forest Service, Boise National Forest Boise Interagency Fire Danger Operating Plan Approved By: Agency Administrators Tanya Thrift - Acting Boise District Manager Date Bureau of Land Management, Boise District Office Bob Pietras - Southwest Area Manager Date Idaho Department of Lands, Southwest Idaho Digitally signed by TAWNYA TAWNYA BRUMMETT BRUMMETT Date: 2021.03.31 12:55:20 -06'00' Tawnya Brummett – Forest Supervisor Date US Forest Service, Boise National Forest THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK Boise Interagency Fire Danger Operating Plan Recommended By: Fire Program Managers Digitally signed by RUSSELL BABIAK RUSSELL BABIAK Date: 2021.03.31 12:38:38 -06'00' Russ Babiak - Fire Management Officer Date Bureau of Land Management, Boise District Casper Urbanek - Fire Warden Date Idaho Department of Lands, Southwest Idaho Richard Zimmerlee - Fire Management Officer Date US Forest Service, Boise National Forest Boise Interagency Fire Danger Operating Plan Recommended By: Fire Program Managers Russ Babiak - Fire Management Officer Date Bureau of Land Management, Boise District Casper Urbanek - Fire Warden Date Idaho Department of Lands, Southwest Idaho RICHARD Digitally signed by RICHARD ZIMMERLEE ZIMMERLEE Date: 2021.03.30 16:39:49 -06'00' Richard Zimmerlee - Fire Management Officer Date US Forest Service, Boise National Forest THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Policy and Guidance ............................................................................................................................ 5 Operating Plan Objectives ................................................................................................................. 6 Fire Danger Planning Area Inventory and Analysis ..................................................................... 7 Fire Danger Rating Areas ................................................................................................................... 7 Administrative Units ........................................................................................................................... 17 Weather Stations ............................................................................................................................... 18 Fire Danger Problem Analysis ................................................................................................... 22 Identification / Definition of the Fire Problem(s) ...................................................................... 22 Fire Problem Analysis Table ............................................................................................................ 23 Fire Danger Decision Analysis ................................................................................................... 25 Climatological Analysis .................................................................................................................... 25 Fire Business Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 25 Parameters Used to Calculate Fire Danger ................................................................................. 26 Decision Summary Table .................................................................................................................. 27 Fire Danger Rating Levels ......................................................................................................... 28 Response (or Dispatch) Level ......................................................................................................... 28 Staffing Level ...................................................................................................................................... 29 Preparedness Level .......................................................................................................................... 30 Preparedness Level Worksheet ............................................................................................................. 30 Fire Danger Adjective Rating Level ............................................................................................... 31 Fire Danger Operating Procedures ........................................................................................... 33 Boise March 2021 Page 1 Interagency Fire Danger Operating Plan Roles and Responsibilities............................................................................................................... 33 Seasonal schedule ............................................................................................................................ 35 Daily Schedule ................................................................................................................................... 36 Weather Station Monitoring and Maintenance ........................................................................ 37 Fire Danger Operating Procedures ........................................................................................... 38 Weather Stations ............................................................................................................................... 38 Computer/equipment ........................................................................................................................ 38 Training ................................................................................................................................................ 38 Seasonal fire danger risk assessments .......................................................................................... 38 APPENDICES .......................................................................................................................................... 39 APPENDIX A: RESPONSE / DISPATCH AREA MAP ................................................................................. 40 APPENDIX B : STAFFING PLAN/DRAWDOWN LEVELS ........................................................................... 41 APPENDIX C: PREVENTION PLANS ......................................................................................................... 42 APPENDIX D: RESTRICTION PLAN .......................................................................................................... 43 APPENDIX E: TOPOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................. 44 APPENDIX F: VEGETATION ................................................................................................................... 45 APPENDIX G: CLIMATE ......................................................................................................................... 46 APPENDIX H: FIRE OCCURENCE ............................................................................................................ 47 APPENDIX I: FIRE FAMILY PLUS ANALYSIS ............................................................................................ 48 APPENDIX J: SOUTHWEST IDAHO FIRE DANGER POCKET CARD ........................................................... 54 APPENDIX K: SOUTHWEST IDAHO FDOP TECHNICAL GROUPS ............................................................. 55 APPENDIX L: CHANGES TO FDOP BY YEAR ........................................................................................... 59 Boise March 2021 Page 2 Interagency Fire Danger Operating Plan INTRODUCTION PURPOSE The public, industry, and our own agency personnel expect the interagency wildland fire management agencies to implement appropriate and timely decisions which ultimately result in safe, efficient, and effective wildland fire management actions. This plan is intended to document a decision-making process for agency administrators, fire program managers, fire operations specialists, dispatchers, agency cooperators, and firefighters by establishing interagency planning and response levels using the best available scientific methods and historical weather/fire data. An appropriate level of preparedness to meet wildland fire management objectives is based upon an assessment of vegetation, climate, and topography utilizing the National Fire Danger Rating System (NFDRS). This plan provides a science-based “tool” for interagency fire managers to incorporate a measure of risk associated with decisions which have the potential to significantly compromise safety and control of wildland fires. Fire Danger
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 12. Owyhee Uplands Section
    12. Owyhee Uplands Section Section Description The Owyhee Uplands Section is part of the Columbia Plateau Ecoregion. The Idaho portion, the subject of this review, comprises southwestern Idaho from the lower Payette River valley in the northwest and the Camas Prairie in the northeast, south through the Hagerman Valley and Salmon Falls Creek Drainage (Fig. 12.1, Fig. 12.2). The Owyhee Uplands spans a 1,200 to 2,561 m (4,000 to 8,402 ft) elevation range. This arid region generally receives 18 to 25 cm (7 to 10 in) of annual precipitation at lower elevations. At higher elevations, precipitation falls predominantly during the winter and often as snow. The Owyhee Uplands has the largest human population of any region in Idaho, concentrated in a portion of the section north of the Snake River—the lower Boise and lower Payette River valleys, generally referred to as the Treasure Valley. This area is characterized by urban and suburban development as well as extensive areas devoted to agricultural production of crops for both human and livestock use. Among the conservation issues in the Owyhee Uplands include the ongoing conversion of agricultural lands to urban and suburban development, which limits wildlife habitat values. In addition, the conversion of grazing land used for ranching to development likewise threatens wildlife habitat. Accordingly, the maintenance of opportunity for economically viable Lower Deep Creek, Owyhee Uplands, Idaho © 2011 Will Whelan ranching operations is an important consideration in protecting open space. The aridity of this region requires water management programs, including water storage, delivery, and regulation for agriculture, commercial, and residential uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Biological Assessment
    REVISED BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Effects of the Modified Idaho Roadless Rule on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, Candidate, and Proposed Species for Terrestrial Wildlife, Aquatics, and Plants September 12, 2008 FINAL BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Effects of the Modified Idaho Roadless Rule on Federally Listed Threatened, Endangered, Candidate, and Proposed Species for Terrestrial Wildlife, Aquatics, and Plants Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................... 1 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL ACTION .................................................................................................... 3 Purpose and Need..................................................................................................................................3 Description of the Project Area...............................................................................................................4 Modified Idaho Roadless Rule................................................................................................................6 Wild Land Recreation (WLR)...............................................................................................................6 Primitive (PRIM) and Special Areas of Historic and Tribal Significance (SAHTS)..............................7 Backcountry/ Restoration (Backcountry) (BCR)................................................................................10 General Forest, Rangeland,
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 18 Southwest Idaho
    Chapter: 18 State(s): Idaho Recovery Unit Name: Southwest Idaho Region 1 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed necessary to recover and/or protect the species. Recovery plans are prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and, in this case, with the assistance of recovery unit teams, State and Tribal agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or indicate the approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Director or Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature Citation: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Chapter 18, Southwest Idaho Recovery Unit, Idaho. 110 p. In: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Draft Recovery Plan. Portland, Oregon. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This chapter was developed with the assistance of the Southwest Idaho Bull Trout Recovery Unit Team, which includes: Dale Allen, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Dave Burns, U.S. Forest Service Tim Burton, U.S. Bureau of Land Management (formerly U.S. Forest Service) Chip Corsi, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Bob Danehy, Boise Corporation Jeff Dillon, Idaho Department of Fish and Game Guy Dodson, Shoshone-Paiute Tribes Jim Esch, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Silver City and Delamar
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Boise State University - ScholarWorks Early Records of the Episcopal Church in Southwestern Idaho, 1867-1916 Silver City and DeLamar Transcribed by Patricia Dewey Jones Boise State University, Albertsons Library Boise, Idaho Copyright Boise State University, 2006 Boise State University Albertsons Library Special Collections Dept. 1910 University Dr. Boise, ID 83725 http://library.boisestate.edu/special ii Table of Contents Foreword iv Book 1: Silver City 1867-1882 1-26 History 3 Families 3 Baptisms 4 Confirmed 18 Communicants 19 Burials 24 Book 2: Silver City 1894-1916 27-40 Communicants 29 Baptisms 32 Confirmations 37 Marriages 38 Burials 39 Book 3: DeLamar 1895-1909 41-59 Historic Notes 43 Baptisms 44 Confirmations 50 Communicants 53 Marriages 56 Burials 58 Surname Index 61 iii Foreword Silver City is located high in the Owyhee Mountains of southwestern Idaho at the headwaters of Jordan Creek in a picturesque valley between War Eagle Mountain on the east and Florida Mountain on the west at an elevation of approximately 6,300 feet. In 1863 gold was discovered on Jordan Creek, starting the boom and bust cycle of Silver City. During the peaks of activity in the local mines, the population grew to a few thousand residents with a full range of business services. Most of the mines played out by 1914. Today there are numerous summer homes and one hotel, but no year-long residents. Nine miles “down the road” from Silver City was DeLamar, another mining boom town.
    [Show full text]
  • West Crane Creek Ranchlands
    WEST CRANE CREEK RANCHLANDS WEST CRANE CREEK RANCHLANDS 677± acres Ranchland & 246 aums on BLM Grazing Allotment Great Cow & Horse Prospect on South Crane Creek Road, Midvale, Idaho EXECUTIVE SUMMARY West Crane Creek Ranchlands are 677± deeded acres of beautiful mountain valley ranchlands with good grasses, springs, seasonal Milk Creek running through and a share in over 10,000 acres of a BLM grazing allotment, which can support close to 100 pair for 4.3 months in a normal year. Running along South Crane Creek Road, the ranchlands offer excellent year- round access. WCC Ranchlands offers spectacular vistas from the hilltops of its 677± deeded acres overlooking Crane Creek Reservoir and the ag-based valley. Nestled in a picturesque foothill basin it could be a great base for a horse & cow outfit. Northern Washington County is still cattle country with fertile croplands, lush pastures and mountain grass. EXCLUSIVELY REPRESENTED BY: Lon Lundberg, CLB, ABR, CCIM Land, Farm & Ranch Brokerage since 1995 www.gatewayra.com ofc: 208-939-0000 c:208-559-2120 [email protected] WEST CRANE CREEK RANCHLANDS Introducing: WEST CRANE CREEK RANCHLANDS WEST CRANE CREEK RANCHLANDS LOCATION Offering beautiful scenery and great access, the 677+ acre West Crane Creek Ranchlands is nestled in a valley basin accessed via Farm-to-Market Road to So. Crane Creek Road southeast of Midvale in Washington County, Idaho. The views from the hilltops offer vistas overlooking Crane Creek Reservoir and the grass-covered hills and valley with snow-capped peaks of Cuddy Mountain. Twenty+ minutes away is Highway 95, which affords excellent access to bring cattle to market, kids to lessons or games, recreational pursuits, fine dining or shopping in the Weiser River Valley, Treasure Valley or Ontario, OR and north to New Meadows, Riggins or McCall.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators
    USDA United States Department of Agriculture Research Natural Areas on Forest Service National Forest System Lands Rocky Mountain Research Station in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, General Technical Report RMRS-CTR-69 Utah, and Western Wyoming: February 2001 A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and E'ducators Angela G. Evenden Melinda Moeur J. Stephen Shelly Shannon F. Kimball Charles A. Wellner Abstract Evenden, Angela G.; Moeur, Melinda; Shelly, J. Stephen; Kimball, Shannon F.; Wellner, Charles A. 2001. Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-69. Ogden, UT: U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 84 p. This guidebook is intended to familiarize land resource managers, scientists, educators, and others with Research Natural Areas (RNAs) managed by the USDA Forest Service in the Northern Rocky Mountains and lntermountain West. This guidebook facilitates broader recognitionand use of these valuable natural areas by describing the RNA network, past and current research and monitoring, management, and how to use RNAs. About The Authors Angela G. Evenden is biological inventory and monitoring project leader with the National Park Service -NorthernColorado Plateau Network in Moab, UT. She was formerly the Natural Areas Program Manager for the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Northern Region and lntermountain Region of the USDA Forest Service. Melinda Moeur is Research Forester with the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain ResearchStation in Moscow, ID, and one of four Research Natural Areas Coordinators from the Rocky Mountain Research Station. J. Stephen Shelly is Regional Botanist and Research Natural Areas Coordinator with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Headquarters Office in Missoula, MT.
    [Show full text]
  • High Resolution Adobe PDF
    115°20'0"W 115°0'0"W 114°40'0"W 114°20'0"W PISTOL LAKE " CHINOOK MOUNTAIN ARTILLERY DOME SLIDEROCK RIDGE FALCONBERRY PEAK ROCK CREEK SHELDON PEAK Red Butte "Grouse Creek Peak WHITE GOAWTh iMte OVaUlleNyT MAoIuNntain LITTLE SOLDIER MOUNTAIN N FD " N FD 6 8 8 T d Parker Mountain 6 Greyhound Mountain r R a k i e " " 5 2 l e 0 1 0 r 0 0 il 1 C l i a 1 n r o Big Soldier Mountain a o e pi r n Morehead Mountain T Pinyon Peak L White MoSunletain g Deer Rd " T " HONEYMOON LAKE " " BIG SOLDIER MOUNTAIN SOLDIER CREEK GREYHOUND MOUNTAIN PINYON PEAK CASTO SHERMAN PEAK CHALLIS CREEK LAKES TWIN PEAKS PATS CREEK Lo FRANK CHURCH - RIVER OF NO RETURN WILDERNESS o n Sherman Peak C Mayfield Peak Corkscrew Mountain r " d e " " R ek ls R l d a Mosquito Flat Reservoir F r e Langer Peak rl g T g k a Ruffneck Peak " ac d D P R d " k R Blue Bunch Mo"untain d e M e k R ill C r e Bear Valley Mountain k e e htmile r " e ig C r E C en r C re d ave Estes Mountain e G ar B e k " R BLUE BUNCH MOUNTAIN d CAPE HORN LAKES LANGER PEAK KNAPP LAKES MOUNT JORDAN l Forest CUSTER ELEVENMILE CREEK BAYHORRSaEm sLhAorKn EMountaiBn AYHORSE Nat De Rd Keysto"ne Mountain velop Road 579 d R " Cabin Creek Peak Red Mountain rk Cape Horn MounCtaaipne Horn Lake #1 o Bay d " Bald Mountain F hors R " " e e Cr 2 d e eek 8 R " nk Rd 5 in Ya d a a nt o ou Lucky B R S A L M O N - C H A L L I S N Fo S p M y o 1 C d Bachelor Mountain R q l " u e 2 5 a e d v y 19 p R Bonanza Peak a B"ald Mountain e d e w Nf 045 D w R R N t " s H s H C d " e sf r e o Basin Butte r 0 t U ' o r e F a n e 0 l t 21 t
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho Mountain Goat Management Plan (2019-2024)
    Idaho Mountain Goat Management Plan 2019-2024 Prepared by IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME June 2019 Recommended Citation: Idaho Mountain Goat Management Plan 2019-2024. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, USA. Team Members: Paul Atwood – Regional Wildlife Biologist Nathan Borg – Regional Wildlife Biologist Clay Hickey – Regional Wildlife Manager Michelle Kemner – Regional Wildlife Biologist Hollie Miyasaki– Wildlife Staff Biologist Morgan Pfander – Regional Wildlife Biologist Jake Powell – Regional Wildlife Biologist Bret Stansberry – Regional Wildlife Biologist Leona Svancara – GIS Analyst Laura Wolf – Team Leader & Regional Wildlife Biologist Contributors: Frances Cassirer – Wildlife Research Biologist Mark Drew – Wildlife Veterinarian Jon Rachael – Wildlife Game Manager Additional copies: Additional copies can be downloaded from the Idaho Department of Fish and Game website at fishandgame.idaho.gov Front Cover Photo: ©Hollie Miyasaki, IDFG Back Cover Photo: ©Laura Wolf, IDFG Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) adheres to all applicable state and federal laws and regulations related to discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, gender, disability or veteran’s status. If you feel you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility of IDFG, or if you desire further information, please write to: Idaho Department of Fish and Game, P.O. Box 25, Boise, ID 83707 or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Federal Assistance, Mailstop: MBSP-4020, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203, Telephone: (703) 358-2156. This publication will be made available in alternative formats upon request. Please contact IDFG for assistance. Costs associated with this publication are available from IDFG in accordance with Section 60-202, Idaho Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Alteration of a Major Neogene River Drainage of the Basin and Range
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2016 TECTONIC ALTERATION OF A MAJOR NEOGENE RIVER DRAINAGE OF THE BASIN AND RANGE Stuart D. Parker Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Tectonics and Structure Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Parker, Stuart D., "TECTONIC ALTERATION OF A MAJOR NEOGENE RIVER DRAINAGE OF THE BASIN AND RANGE" (2016). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 10637. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/10637 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TECTONIC ALTERATION OF A MAJOR NEOGENE RIVER DRAINAGE OF THE BASIN AND RANGE By STUART DOUGLAS PARKER Bachelor of Science, University of North Carolina-Asheville, Asheville, North Carolina, 2014 Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology The University of Montana Missoula, MT May, 2016 Approved by: Scott Whittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School James W. Sears, Committee Chair Department of Geosciences Rebecca Bendick Department of Geosciences Marc S. Hendrix Department of Geosciences Andrew Ware Department of Physics and Astronomy Parker, Stuart, M. S., May, 2016 Geology Tectonic alteration of a major Neogene river drainage of the Basin and Range Chairperson: James W.
    [Show full text]
  • Payette River Basin Initiative
    Payette River Basin Initiative Purpose The purpose of the Payette River Basin (PRB) Initiative is to utilize conservation easements in permanently conserving portions of land which hold natural, recreational, agricultural and hydrological water resource value. The PRB initiative hopes to receive and focus local, regional and national resources to accomplish this goal. The waterways, lakes, and wild country within and around the basin has drawn people to the area for generations and with increased use, development is inevitable. The Payette Land Trust (PLT) has long understood the importance of the Basin to the area’s quality of life, economic viability, unique natural beauty and the importance to the State’s water quality. The PLT will strive to keep the land in private ownership and provide the opportunity for public access through agreements with willing private landowners. Goal The Goal of the PRB initiative is to permanently conserve a connected corridor from the Payette Lake inlet to Cabarton Bridge along the main stem of the North Fork Payette River. This effort will allow for access, recreation and movement of both people and wildlife within the corridor, while conserving the existing natural beauty and water quality. Payette River Basin Initiative Payette Land Trust: What We Believe The PLT believes in conserving the rural landscape of west central Idaho for the benefit of our community and future generations. We promote a community ethic that values and conserves its working agricultural properties and timberlands in balance with thoughtful development. We envision dedicated areas of open access and connectivity encouraging people to take part in their environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho Moose Management Plan 2020-2025
    Idaho Moose Management Plan 2020-2025 DRAFT December 10, 2019 1 This page intentionally left blank. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Shiras Moose (Alces alces shirasi) occur across much of Idaho, except for the southwest corner of the state. Moose are highly valued by both hunters and non-hunters, providing consumptive and non-consumptive opportunities that have economic and aesthetic value. Over the past century their known range has expanded from small areas of northern and eastern Idaho to their current distribution. Population size also increased during this time, likely peaking around the late 1990s or early 2000s. The Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) is concerned that current survey data, anecdotal information and harvest data indicate moose have recently declined in parts of Idaho. Several factors may be impacting moose populations both positively and negatively including predation, habitat change (e.g., roads, development, timber harvest), changing climate, disease or parasites and combinations thereof. IDFG was established to preserve, protect, perpetuate and manage all of Idaho’s fish and wildlife. As such, species management plans are written to set statewide management direction to help fulfill IDFG’s mission. Idaho’s prior moose management plan (Idaho Department of Fish and Game 1990) addressed providing a quality hunting experience, the vulnerability of moose to illegal harvest, protecting their habitat, improving controlled hunt drawing odds and expanding moose populations into suitable ranges. The intent of this revision to the 1990 Moose Management Plan is to provide guidance for IDFG and their partners to implement management actions that will aid in protection and management of moose populations in Idaho and guide harvest season recommendations for the next 6 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Nez Perce–Clearwater National Forests Forest Plan Assessment 5.0
    Nez Perce–Clearwater National Forests Forest Plan Assessment 5.0 Threatened, Endangered, Proposed, and Candidate Species June 2014 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................ i List of Figures .......................................................................................................................... ii 5.0 Threatened, Endangered, Proposed, and Candidate Species .................................. 5-3 5.1 Wildlife.................................................................................................................... 5-3 5.1.1 Canada Lynx .................................................................................................... 5-3 5.1.2 Wolverine ....................................................................................................... 5-43 5.2 Aquatics ................................................................................................................. 5-52 5.2.1 Existing Information ...................................................................................... 5-52 5.2.2 Informing the Assessment.............................................................................. 5-52 5.2.3 Literature Cited .............................................................................................. 5-64 5.3 Rare Plants............................................................................................................. 5-67 5.3.1 Existing Information .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]