DOCSLIB.ORG

Relations Between Ngati Makino and Other Hapu of Ngati Pikiao In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Relations Between Ngati Makino and Other Hapu of Ngati Pikiao In OFFICIAL RESEARCH REPORT RELATIONS BETWEEN NGATI MAKINO AND OTHER HAPU OF NGATI PIKIAO IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY Tom Bennion April 1996 CONTENTS Page Summary 2 Maps of the Rotoiti block 4-5 Preface 5 Introduction 5 The choice of the Rotoiti case 7 Approach to the minute books 7 Overview of the case 12 The nature of Ngati Makino 14 Preliminary meetings concerning the Rotoiti and Otamarakau blocks 18 The ancestral IItakell advanced 25 Evidence of resource use 32 Burials 34 The final--process of putting Ngati Makino into the block 36 Conclusions 38 Ngati Makino - Ngati Pikiao report 2 Summary This report looks at the relationship between Ngati Makino and other hapu of Ngati Pikiao as evidenced in proceedings before the Native Land Court in the last century. The major question which it seeks to answer is: whether or not most of Ngati Makino's traditional land interests were confined to the Waitahanui and Tahunaroa subdivisions of the great Otamarakau block, so that, after the sale of those subdivisions, Ngati Makino were deprived of a substantial part of their hapu endowment, in contrast to other hapu of Ngati Pikiao. A former officer of the Maori Land Court in Rotorua, Harris Martin, has looked for prominent Ngati Makino names appearing in applicatiohs before the court, and in the final lists of owners produced by the court. His findings show that, unquestionably, names of persons identifying as Ngati Makino did appear in ownership lists for several blocks inland of Otamarakau, and that they retained ownership of their interests for many years after the sale of the Otamarakau block. The report also investigates, whether Ngati Makino received their full entitlement to these inland blocks. In other words, while they were awarded some areas in the name of the ancestor put forward on behalf of Ngati Makino, in some cases their claim was rejected. Was it properly rejected? Or, were Ngati Makino kept out of inland blocks rightfully theirs by other groups within Ngati Pikiao jealous about their influence? An answer to this question was attempted by looking at the extensive minutes for the Rotoiti block, which came before the land court in 1899-1900. From those minutes, this report concludes that: • Ngati-Makino were variously described as a distinct group called Waitaha, a hapu of Waitaha, and as a hapu of Ngati Pikiao. The identification seems to have varied depending on whether the speaker wished to show distinctions within Ngati Pikiao or not. They were undoubtedly for most purposes regarded as a powerful hapu of the broad Ngati Pikiao confederation of hapu. • For the purpose of claims to land, individuals might validly claim to belong to several different hapu. Some individuals in relation to particular blocks of land were called "takawaenga" because no one ancestor or hapu interest predominated. However, outside of particular land claims, it was know that individuals had a primary hapu identification, referred to as their "tino hapu" or "tuturu hapu". It seems that, where possible, individuals preferred to bring land claims in the name of their primary hapu. Holding land under the name of the primary hapu and ancestor seems to have accorded greater control in terms-of Maori custom and law. Ngati Makino - Ngati Pikiao report 3 • In relation to the Otamarakau block, Ngati Makino were successful in having the Waitahanui subdivision put through the court in the name of the primary ancestor of the Ngati Makino hapu. There were however valid interests of other hapu of Ngati Pikiao in that subdivision. These were represented in the name Ngati Te Kehu. Ngati Makino made private arrangements outside the court to include Ngati Te Kehu names. In this way it seems that other hapu of Ngati Pikiao did have and secured interests in the Waitahanui subdivision of the Otamarakau block. In the Tahunaroa subdivision, Ngati Pikiao appear also to have secured interests under the name of the ancestor Uruika. • In relation to the Rotoiti block, Ngati Makino had originally attempted to include it in an application to determine title for all land from the inland lakes to the coast, under the name of Ngati Pikiao. Later, Ngati Makino tried to have a block, covering the area of what later became the Rotoiti block, surveyed under the name of Matawhaura. They accepted a ruling from the rest of Ngati Pikiao that they should not do this, in part because Ngati Makino were living at the coast and no longer actively used their inland properties. • Six hapu of Ngati Pikiao then had the Rotoiti block surveyed and made an application to the land court. Ngati Makino were not a part of this application in their own right. Ngati Makino were however informed of the application. The intention was to take account of their interests under the names of some of the six hapu making the application. The reasons for this approach appear to have been: the six hapu argued that Ngati Makino interests in the Rotoiti block were not very strong because they had not lived there for some years Ngati Makino had suggested that the whole block be put in in the name of Ngati Makino, but this had been rejected. • White-the six hapu appear never to have denied that Ngati Makino had some rights in the Rotoiti block, it seems that they actively sought to minimise those rights in making the application and pursuing it in the way that they did. Certainly the final court award was more generous to Ngati Makino than the application filed by the six hapu. • In the event, Ngati Makino, under Ereatara Rangihoro, launched a powerful claim before the court to the whole of the Rotoiti block. This claim was ultimately rejected, but the court readily accepted, and Ngati Makino seem to have agreed to, more limited rights in parts of the block. One subdivision, Okahu, was awarded in the name of the Ngati Makino hapu. In two other subdivisions, Ngati Makino were awarded distinct blocks of shares, albeit that the subdivisions were awarded under the name of the ancestor of another hapu. In reaching its decision the court rejected large parts of Ereatara's evidence and preferred the evidence of older and less obviously biased witnesses such as Tieri te Tikiao. Ngati Makino - Ngati Pikiao report 4 • Whether this decision gave Ngati Makino less than their entitlement in Maori custom is difficult to say. However, several factors suggest the decision was probably to a fair degree in accord with what the hapu might have agreed among themselves: the Rotoiti case was brought before several preliminary tribal meetings " and Ngati Makino's extensive claims to the block were rejected outright; Ngati Makino evidence was thoroughly tested in cross examination by the other hapu of Ngati Pikiao, and found to be in conflict with evidence given in earlier years before the land court; Ngati Makino witnesses, in particular Ereatara Rangihoro, made admissions about Ngati Makino interests in the Otamarakau block and about Ngati Makino activities in the 2 decades preceding the Rotoiti case (ie the 1880s and 1890s), which suggested their rights in the Rotoiti block were not extensive, and certainly did not extend to the whole Rotoiti block; During the court hearing, Ngati Makino reached voluntary arrangements with other hapu of Ngati Pikiao over parts of the block, which seems to have been a tacit admission that Ngati Makino rights were not as extensive as were claimed; After the initial decision of the court, Ngati Makino actively lobbied for inclusion in lists of owners for several divisions, which were determined by hapu committees, and indicated satisfaction with the inclusions that were made; Ngati Makino never appealed the decision of the court, even though there are indications that they contemplated an appeal during the - proceedings. LOCATION MAP OF THE ROTOITI BLOCK (not to scale) ~, . N -----·-------- .. ~. eC "', G. RUN ," ROW N ,,"< C "'" t:j "l- 7.'1 & r -". 'N~ .. "',~. ~ ' r (",,'OK.O p." •N' 'J ", 0 ,." .' 'j : ... ~ . \ 'i \. r ~ I . , Tf£ ROI0~I \ 'I' .... I '" I- c'·· "', •• ~'"' \../"' r i fA, ) .. '. • , ,. .•.•. 7 Rot 0 i t i & rid 0 m a s, o · T. "" . ':' 1., 0 "p'" "','.'" '''. .. 'Y'n ~.~'"\ '" I,•. •, h T. P.k,.'., P" '\,\:;" ~, 'I" 0::," ',m,'" ..',. ""J' /1,t :., G RUN ''''',8" '\ ~ ~ "sc'1)'/'V c'dwl,s TO;' //'Ibl ~ • 0.~ '" "",. ,. '. ~ .~\, .. ) '., .. " "" .",TAHNUJ M,),.. ' U '" \'~ '.0\ . f' '. '\""i'~ I ,0 \ ~~ 0..Z '.,.J \,1';-; '-...j .', i ' 9;08 .~'C . •. p. • .'-...........'--~ II I- \ . ::)1 50",;, :9000 0 O'Al'l'"ox. 0 'I'.. (, SO. U1' HTAfiEKE I: I, , ROfPMA"."".,,,.:;'.~ ( :cO BLOCK \.)'" ROTO I TIS 0 , , ",\~ ~~~£'",r;t\rr;.,~'",.,.,'" 1 I 0:: ·",,-, ,,,,w .... " .,i", ., ...... ~,. '~("•.-, ;;,"..,." '''''-d<<1,"" ",. ; ~_~'",..... " \ R ,0 TO """ r ~." ,~- ~.,.<,~ ~ ~ I .''',','.,' " .. \ TIMS-R i'ESY-i · ~~ ~-...: ",' ~ M "".,,,, .. ,. k. .. ~ "'.,, " ......".. '/. ' , .....,. '. , . OlJ.;" 't.,.... ' .. ,~, £ HI!) \' (Tf HOJ' \ R0 A 11':)______~. '" '""' '. '. •.•• •...... ,.. "",,.,,,k, . / , 0:::UJ .".... ;..!;. • ~.'\..... ~~ LA K E \. /.J . ''''''~'''S;:---...\ '---wA~TAN' "~h;' U9- to: ". 'L-., 'jIHOEKA- ) \ · / c ""'" ( /.... \,,,, .... ,,, . ( ,..... ('ij,k>t"mHo J LA K£ -SMATA"'"'L'RA " -"1,1,/ )TE., " , .---;,. :y L~, r....) 'c i.., •. -B'K. '0> "--'. .. ). "_ ..... (' ~ I 1 J:) 0 TO / T/ /1'""'"a"" .. " ..~"CeO'. .•. ,.)/ •~ RakacMak"'~' .. '-Cl......"'''''"".. .... _. • '. .. "~/ O J""r,j,~~-;"-'-.. \ 4 /, . .___. """'" .. '..'~" , ,-'----:l 1/ / / ,,,.l,. ,,.co'-9" "'1 """, ib.. ,,""C,. ""., '..;.-" "'. " cO TOM,'/ 4 "\, - , :5"') '" .... .~,c." C <...:.:=~;'.,." "
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geographic Specificity Indigenous Peoples
    1/05/2017 Te Arawa is the vessel that my ancestors voyaged upon 37th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment Le Centre Sheraton Montréal Hôtel, Montréal, Canada Ngāti Pikiao are the descendents, the people I belong to 4‐7 April 2017 Matawhaura is our sacred mountain Session: Impact assessment, climate change, and lasting community wellbeing 11am Wednesday 5 April Te Roto ikite ai e Ihenga are our waters Title: Anticipatory adaptation and the Mauri Model Te Rangiunuora is our eponymous ancestral bond Te Puna Whakareia A Rākeiao is our gathering place Dr Kēpa Morgan BE, MBA, PhD, FIPENZ, LMSPPEEx General Manager, Ngāti Mākino Iwi Authority Acknowledgement and Salutations to you all. Anticipatory Adaptation Challenge Geographic Specificity Indigenous Peoples (Durie, 2005) The majority of anticipatory adaptation frameworks applied in developed nations idealize institutional and • Unity with the environment (holistic ontology) cultural readiness for their successful deployment. • Geographic relationship of belonging Anticipatory Adaptation in Marginalized Communities Within Developed Countries • Endurance over many generations (time) Boyle and Dowlatabadi 2011 • Development of a distinctive culture (identity) • System of knowledge Anticipatory Climate Change Adaptation is difficult • A unique language because CC is a global phenomenon, it is realised over • Epitomise Sustainability generations, and requires detailed ways of knowing that are geographically specific. Strategic responses are The enduring relationship
    [Show full text]
  • Iwi / Hapū Rights and Interests in Fresh Water: Recognition Work-Stream: Research Report
    IWI / HAPŪ RIGHTS AND INTERESTS IN FRESH WATER: RECOGNITION WORK-STREAM: RESEARCH REPORT CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 4 Possible outcomes and mechanisms for effective rights recognition ............................................... 5 Alternative forms of iwi relationship to freshwater bodies ............................................................. 6 Iwi, hapū and whānau as kaitiaki and decision-makers for particular waterbodies in their rohe and/or areas of responsibility ...................................................................................................... 6 Iwi/hapū access to fresh water for marae, papakainga and mahinga kai ...................................... 7 Additional outcomes / directions .................................................................................................. 7 INTRODUCTION, PURPOSE AND SCOPE ..................................................................................... 10 PART ONE: IWI / HAPŪ / WHĀNAU RELATIONSHIPS WITH FRESHWATER AND PARTICULAR FRESHWATER BODIES ................................................................................................................. 12 Tikanga Taiao: The Māori View of the Environment ...................................................................... 13 Tikanga Wai: The Māori View of Freshwater................................................................................. 14 Identity and Freshwater ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Te Pai Tawhiti: Exploring the Horizons of Māori Economic Performance Through Effective Collaboration
    Te Pai Tawhiti: Exploring the Horizons of Māori Economic Performance through Effective Collaboration Final Report 2016 Te Pai Tawhiti: Exploring the Horizons of Māori Economic Performance through Effective Collaboration Prepared by Dr Robert Joseph ArapetaFinal Tahana Report Jonathan Kilgour2016 Dr Jason Mika Te Mata Hautū Taketake GHA Pare Consulting GHA University of Waikato MylenePrepared Rakena by Te Puritanga Jefferies UniversityDr Robert of JosephWaikato GHAArapeta Tahana Jonathan Kilgour Dr Jason Mika Te Mata Hautū Taketake GHA Pare Consulting GHA PreparedUniversity for of Waikato Ngā Pae o Te Māramatanga Mylene Rakena Te Puritanga Jefferies 2016 University of Waikato GHA Prepared for Ngā Pae o Te Māramatanga Research Partners 2016 Research Partners Ngāti Pikiao iwi and hapū Ngāti Pikiao iwi and hapū Above Illustration The above illustration is a view of Lake Rotoehu, looking at the Ngāti Pikiao maunga Matawhaura. Most Ngāti Pikiao people view Matawhaura from Lake Rotoiti. Viewing Matawhaura from a different perspective to what Ngāti Pikiao are used to offers a valuable analogy of viewing what Ngāti Pikiao have from a different perspective which aligns with the theses of this report. CONTENTS DIAGRAMS, TABLES, MAPS & GRAPHS .................................................................................. 7 HE MIHI ................................................................................................................................. 8 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ka Pu Te Ruha, Ka Hao Te Rangatahi Annual Report 2020 Nga Rarangi Take
    Nga Rarangi Take Ka Pu Te Ruha, Ka Hao Te Rangatahi Annual Report 2020 Nga Rarangi Take Ka Pu Te Ruha, Ka Hao Te Rangatahi When the old net is cast aside, the new net goes fishing, our new strategy remains founded on our vision. Nga Rarangi Take CONTENTS Nga Rarangi Take Introduction/Snapshot 4 Te Arawa 500 scholarships 26 Highlights - 2020 5 Iwi Partnership Grants Programme 27 Your Te Arawa Fisheries 6 Te Arawa Mahi 28 Our Mission/Vision 8 INDIGI-X 29 Message form the Chair 9 Looking to the Future 30 CEO’s Report 10 Research and Development 31 COVID-19 11 Smart Māori Aquaculture Ngā Iwi i Te Rohe o Te Waiariki 32 Rotorua Business Awards Finalist 12 Ka Pu Te Ruha, Ka Hao te Rangatahi Taking our Strategy to the next level 14 Te Arawa Fisheries Climate Change Strategy 34 Governance Development 16 Aka Rākau Strategic Partnerships and Investing for the Future 18 Te Arawa Carbon Forestry Offset Programme 36 Te Arawa Fresh - What Lies Beneath 20 Te Arawa Fresh Online 21 APPENDIX 1: T500 Recipients 38 Our People 22 APPENDIX 2: 2019-2020 Pataka Kai Recipients 40 Our Team 22 APPENDIX 3: AGM Minutes of the Meeting for Te Arawa Fisheries 42 Diversity Report 24 Financial Report 2020 45 Our board of trustees: from left to right. Tangihaere MacFarlane (Ngati Rangiwewehi), Christopher Clarke (Ngati Rangitihi), Blanche Reweti (Ngati Tahu/Whaoa), Dr Kenneth Kennedy (Ngati Rangiteaorere), back Willie Emery (Ngati Pikiao), in front of Dr Ken Roku Mihinui (Tuhourangi), Paeraro Awhimate (Ngati makino), in front Pauline Tangohau (Te Ure o Uenukukopako), behind Punohu McCausland (Waitaha), Tere Malcolm (Tarawhai) Nga Rarangi Take Introduction/Snapshot Timatanga Korero e Kotahitanga o Te Arawa Waka Fisheries Trust Board was legally established on T19 December 1995 by a deed of trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognising Rangatiratanga: Sharing Power with Māori Through Co-Management
    RECOGNISING RANGATIRATANGA: SHARING POWER WITH MĀORI THROUGH CO-MANAGEMENT Samuel George Wevers A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Bachelor of Laws (Honours) Faculty of Law University of Otago 2011 To the memory of my great-great grandfather William Rolleston Minister of Native Affairs and Minister of Justice 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my most sincere thanks to the following: Professor John Dawson, for his patience and insight My family, each of whom have inspired me in their own way Max Harris, Henry Clayton and SJR Sutton, for their help Hamuera Orupe McLeod (Joe), who unknowingly sparked my interest in these matters 3 Glossary of Māori Terms Hapū Extended family group; sub-tribe Iwi Tribe Kaitiaki Guardian Kaitiakitanga Guardianship Kāwanatanga Governance Mana whakahaere Power to manage Mātauranga Māori science and knowledge Tangata whenua Māori people with customary authority in a particular area; people of the land Tangihanga Funeral ceremony Taonga Treasured thing; valued things and resources Tikanga Māori custom or law Tino rangatiratanga Māori constitutional authority; tribal self-government 4 Table of Contents Glossary of Māori Terms ........................................................................................................ 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 6 Part One .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • District District
    HAVE YOUR SAY ONLINE www.westernbay.govt.nz Are my rates going to increase and if so by how much? SEE PAGE 8 How can I comment or give feedback on the issues raised? SEE PAGE 20 Can I attend a meeting to find out more? SEE PAGE 20 SETTING THE PACE FOR MORE THE NEXT 10 YEARS DETAILS INSIDE... your DDIISSTTRRIICCTT COUNCIL Long Term Plan 2015–2025 CONSULTATION DOCUMENT Te Kaunihera a rohe mai i nga Kuri-a-Wharei ki Otamarakau ki te Uru People • Plan • Progress CONTENTS Waihi Beach Message from the Mayor 3 Athenree WESTERN Key priorities 4 BAY OF PLENTY Balancing the books 5 Katikati KATIKATI / DISTRICT Issues we are facing 6 WAIHI BEACH Rates 8 WARD Omokoroa Te Puna Infrastructure 12 TAURANGA CITY Stormwater 13 Maketu Promotion of Waihi Beach 15 Pukehina Beach Tauranga Moana Coastal Cycle Trail 16 Te Puke Changes to the way we fund swimming pools 17 Paengaroa KAIMAI WARD Library and service centres 17 Heritage Museum 18 How to have your say 20 MAKETU / Feedback form 21 TE PUKE WARD Audit Letter23 YOUR MAYOR & DISTRICT WARD COUNCILLORS KATIKATI / KAIMAI WARD WESTERN BAY OF PLENTY MAKETU / WAIHI BEACH WARD DISTRICT MAYOR TE PUKE WARD 1 Ross Goudie 4 Garry Webber 7 Ross Paterson 8 Sue Matthews Ph 07 863 6151 Ph 07 548 2224 Ph 07 548 0478 Ph 07 533 1108 ross.goudie garry.webber@ ross.paterson@ sue.matthews@ @westernbay.govt.nz westernbay.govt.nz westernbay.govt.nz westernbay.govt.nz Mike Williams Margaret Murray-Benge Karyl Gunn 2 Ph 07 549 4425 5 Ph 07 543 0317 10 Ph 07 573 6061 mike.williams@ margaret.murray-benge@ karyl.gunn@ westernbay.govt.nz
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4 Schedule of Proposed Esplanade Reserves and Strips
    Appendix 4 Schedule of Proposed Esplanade Reserves and Strips Note: The true left or right bank refers to the respective bank of the stream or river when facing downstream. 1. An esplanade strip of 10m in width or 20m in width where topography dictates a wider strip is necessary to provide public access shall be set aside along the rivers and streams identified in the District Plan namely: (i) the true right bank of the Waiau River downstream from Waiau Road to Steele Road; (ii) Wairoa Stream above the confluence with the Waitengaue Stream, Woodlands Road; (iii) the true right bank of the Tuapiro Stream from the western end of Woodlands Road to the Tauranga Harbour and the true left bank upstream of MacMillan Road for a distance of approximately 350m; (iv) both banks of the Uretara Stream downstream of Wharawhara Road to the closed railway line, the true left bank upstream of the State Highway to the proposed Katikati bypass and the true left bank upstream of Wharawhara Road to the Wharawhara Water Treatment Plant; (v) the true right bank of the Te Rereatukahia Stream upstream of the Sapphire Springs Holiday Park to the Kaimai Mamaku Conservation Park and the true left bank downstream of State Highway 2 to the Tauranga Harbour; (vi) the true right bank of Aongatete Stream downstream of Hume Lane to the unformed roadline off Wrights Road north of Pine Ridge Lane; (vii) the true left bank of the Aongatete Stream downstream of Hume Lane to the confluence of the Kauritatahi Stream then up the true left bank of the Kauritatahi Stream to the
    [Show full text]
  • Ngati Pikiao Lands: Loss of Tribal Ownership and Control
    NGATI PIKIAO LANDS: LOSS OF TRIBAL OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL Alan Ward Newcastle, N.S.W 21 October 2001 A report for the Waitangi Tribunal Synopsis In customary Maori society, different kinds of land rights were held at different levels of the society - individual, whanau, hapu, and iwi. The advent of the commercial economy led Maori to seek clearer definition oftheir rights, at each of those levels, as do modern South Pacific societies. But there was no widespread demand among Maori to abrogate totally the 'tribal' level- certainly not among Ngati Pikiao. British and colonial govemments, however, purported to transmute the allegedly communal 'tribal' rights into individual rights, through the operation of the Native Land Acts. In fact, they elevated customary individual use rights into the right of each individual to severally alienate his or her interests in the new titles, while rarely facilitating the development of individual farms on the ground. In reaction against the debilitating effect of this process, Maori, for more than a century, have demanded a restoration of 'tribal' authority over the land. This would appear to be in contradiction to the trend in other South Pacific societies, where the drive for individual or family enterprises is strong. In fact, however, most South Pacific societies are opposed to widespread 'land registration' or 'conversion' or 'titling'ofcustomary tenure. Instead, there is a great deal of infOlmal demarcation of individual and family farms, internal migration of small groups, and informal trading in land rights to accommodate these trends. Formalisation of the arrangements is sometimes sought to accommodate internal migration, especially to the towns, but still with limited modification of customary tenure.
    [Show full text]
  • Ngāti Mākino Heritage Trust
    NGĀTI MĀKINO HERITAGE TRUST REGION-WIDE WATER QUALITY – PROPOSED PC9 TO BOP REGIONAL WATER AND LAND PLAN Dr Kēpa Morgan FEngNZ Kaiwhakahaere Matua / General Manager RARANGA TAKE 1. Ngāti Mākino Heritage Trust Priorities 1. Ngāti Mākino Rohe Map 2. Ngā Kuha O Mākino 3. Waitahanui 4. Otamarakau Marae 2. Relevance of Earlier Mahi 1. NMHT v. BoPRC (2014) NZEnvC25 3. Challenges 1. Inconsistent Basis for Decision Making 4. Outcome Sought 1. Adopt a culturally competent and Iwi inclusive approach to this challenge. Matawhaura te maunga, Rotoehu te moana, Whakahau te tangata Mākino te iwi, he taniwha ngā tangata, he paruparu ngā kai. Kia aho matuahia te taketake – Kia tuwaerea te tau, a Mākino. Ngāti Mākino Rohe Rotoehu me Matawhaura Ngā Kuha O Mākino Waitahanui Otari Pa Moutoroi Pa Moutoroi nohonga Nga Kuha o Makino Rotoehu West Redress Land (A) (NTST Rotoehu Ecological Reserve 3 1-0 Te Porotai o Waitaha a Hei 1-05 Kohanga Rotoehu West Rakau o 1-02 Block Redress Land (B) Kauwae Hapa (NTST 1-0 1 1-04 Nohonga site Waitahanui In Ngāti Mākino Heritage Trust v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [2014] NZEnvC 25 the Court notes “there is no dispute that Waitahanui represents the key tāonga of the Ngāti Mākino iwi and their hapu”. Otamarakau Marae 'the relationship between Mā ori and their tāonga "exists beyond mere ownership, use, or exclusive possession; it concerns personal and tribal identity, Māori authority and control, and the right to continuous access, subject to Māori cultural preferences" Ngāti Mākino Heritage Trust v. Bay of Plenty Regional Council 2014 NZEnvC 25 Inconsistent Basis for Analysis & Decision Making Inconsistent Basis for Analysis & Decision Making 2015 Allocation Status Surface Water Inconsistent Basis for Analysis & Decision Making Kia aho matuahia te taketake – Kia tuwaerea te tau, a Mākino.
    [Show full text]
  • Ngā Ringa Raupā O Pikiao: Waiariki Agricultural Collaboration
    Report Ngà Ringa Raupà o Pikiao Waiariki Agricultural Collaboration Neville King, Rangimarie Hunia and Leah Fitzpatrick Authors Neville King, Rangimarie Hunia and Leah Fitzpatrick Project team Neville King, Olive Jonas, Stephen Carr, Rangimarie Hunia, Leah Fitzpatrick, Tony Whata, Laurence Tamati, Morris Meha, Barry Ogilvie and Putu Mihaka Publishers Ako Aotearoa – The National Centre for Tertiary Teaching Excellence PO Box 756 Wellington 6140 www.akoaotearoa.ac.nz Published September 2015 ISBN (online) 978-1-927202-84-5 http://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/projects/waiariki-agricultural-collaboration This work is published under the Creative Commons 3.0 New Zealand Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike Licence (BY-NC-SA). Under this licence you are free to copy, distribute, display and perform the work as well as to remix, tweak and build upon this work non-commercially, as long as you credit the author/s and license your new creations under the identical terms. i Ngā Ringa Raupā o Pikiao – Waiariki Agricultural Collaboration Mihi Ka raranga ngā hau ki te muri Ka raranga ngā hau ki te tonga Ka whakapuke ngā ngaru ki te ngarue ki te heru ngā pōtiki o Hinehopu ki te matarae i -ō -rehu Whano whano haere mai te toki Haumi e! Hui e! Tāiki e! E te tī, e te tā, e ngā ihu oneone o tō tātou kaupapa hirahira nei, tēnā koutou. Nei rā te mihi whakamahana ki a tātou katoa i roto i te wā o Raumati. Me te aha anō, e kohae ana mai a Matariki i tōna pae, e kohae ana hoki ngā Pūmanawa e waru o Te Arawa mō ngā tōtara haemata i hinga mai nei ki roto i a mātou o Te Waiariki.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Consent Applications Received: 18 March - 12 May 2019 Application Date Notified Applicant Location Details Planner Number Lodged Yes/No
    Resource Consent Applications Received: 18 March - 12 May 2019 Application Date Notified Applicant Location Details Planner Number Lodged Yes/No 11369* 18-Mar-19 NO DONALD, ROBERT MICHAEL 367 MAUNGARANGI ROAD RURAL BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT GAEL STEVENS FAST 11372* 19-Mar-19 SINGH, GURWINDER 5 FLEUR PLACE MINOR DWELLING IN RESIDENTIAL ZONE ROGER FOXLEY TRACK NEW DWELLING ENCROACHING ROAD BOUNDARY (WRITTEN APPROVAL 11368* 19-Mar-19 NO HART, MARIA 90 TIM ROAD CHRIS WATT OF ROADING) 11370* 19-Mar-19 NO WHITEMAN, RUSSELL KNIGHT 275 ATHENREE ROAD NEW SHED WITH FRONT YARD SETBACK IN RURAL ZONE ROGER FOXLEY 11373* 20-Mar-19 NO MCALISTER, LORRIMER CARLIE 614 KAITEMAKO ROAD DWELLING WITH A FRONT YARD ENCROACHMENT ANNA PRICE INSTALLATION OF SWIMMING POOL WITHIN AN ECOLOGICAL AREA (V14/2) 11376* 20-Mar-19 NO JAMIESON, CATHERINE ANN 733 MAKETU ROAD GAEL STEVENS AND A FLOOD ZONE 11380* 20-Mar-19 NO THE LODGE LIMITED 714 PYES PA ROAD (SH 36) NEW BUILDING TO PROVIDE FOR 104 BEDS FOR THE LODGE CARE HOME ROGER FOXLEY TO SELL LIQUOR ON SITE FOR THE ADDRESS INDIAN KITCHEN., HOURS OF 11389* 20-Mar-19 NO THE ADDRESS INDIAN KITCHEN 168 OMOKOROA ROAD OPERATION MONDAY TO SUNDAY 10AM TO 11PM JODY SCHUURMAN SHOP 3 11375* 21-Mar-19 NO BRAGG, HENRY EARLE 52 TAUPATA STREET BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT - RURAL ZONE ANNA PRICE RETROSPECTIVE CONSENT FOR A 78.19M2 DWELLING AND AN ADDITIONAL 11374* 21-Mar-19 NO HEATON, SELWYN GEORGE 50 DILLON STREET ROGER FOXLEY DWELLING. CERT OF COMPLIANCE TO SELL LIQUOR ONSITE - HOURS OF OPERATION JP HOSPITALITY SOLUTIONS 11404* 25-Mar-19 NO MINDEN ROAD 9:30AM TO 10:30PM JODY SCHUURMAN LIMITED LINKED TO RC11203 11384* 25-Mar-19 NO OLD NEW ZEALAND LIMITED 665A MINDEN ROAD MINDEN 1A LIFESTYLE SUBDIVISION & MINDEN STABILITY AREA U.
    [Show full text]
  • Otaramakau-Matata Coastal Area
    Otaramakau-Matata Coastal Area Management Strategy Situation Report Prepared for Bay of Plenty Regional Council and Whakatane District Council by Boffa Miskell Limited April 2011 Otaramakau-Matata Coastal Area Management Strategy Situation Report Prepared by: Craig Batchelar Principal Planner Level 2 116 on Cameron Cnr Cameron Road and Wharf Street PO Box 13 373 Tauranga 3030, New Zealand Telephone: +64 7 571 5511 Facsimile: +64 7 571 3333 Date: April 2011 Reference: T10091 Status: Final Otaramakau-Matata Coastal Area Management Strategy Situation Report CONTENTS 1.0U U PurposeU U ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0U U BackgroundU U ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.1U U StudyU AreaU ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2.2U U PlanningU Horizon U ........................................................................................................................... 2 2.3U U LandU OwnershipU ............................................................................................................................. 2 3.0U U CommunityU Engagement U ....................................................................................................................... 2 3.1U U EngagementU ProcessU ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]