Manitoba R3T 2N6 Phone: 949-5096 April , 1984 Ii

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Manitoba R3T 2N6 Phone: 949-5096 April , 1984 Ii Po s -~ -J ~ ...... ~ LIBRARY FISHERIES AND OCEANS BIBLJOTHEQUE ricnEs ET oct.\Ns DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND OCEA NS lVV Al9 ·s·N 'H1now HIVO 900 L XC: 9 AHdVll~ONV3:>0 :10 :IJ.OJ.1.LSNI Oll0:10:19 Al1Vll911 :JHJ. PLANT INSPECTION PROCEDURES Plant Services Section Southern Operations Di rectorate Western Region 501 University Crescent Winni peg, Manitoba R3T 2N6 Phone: 949-5096 April , 1984 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS =================== Page List of Figures . ii i List of Tables iv List of Abbreviations v Plant Registration Program l Cold Storage Procedures • 111 Approved Pest Control Program • 114 Plastic Tub and Wood Box Storage • 122 Multi-Purpose Plants • 125 Field Procedures - Water and Ice Sources • • 132 In-Plant Bacteriological Surveys • 138 The Membrane Filter Technique • 144 Water and Ice - Samples and results 1983/84 . 127 ii i LIST OF FIGURES ================ Page Figure 1 - Certificate of Registration . 8 Figure 2 - Team Survey Form . 80 Figure 3 - Fish Plant Report • . 88 Figure 4 - Sanitarians Check Sheet • . 93 iv LIST OF TABLES ======== Page Table 1 - Registered Plants Classification Listing 19 Table 2 - Unregistered Plants Classification Listing • 39 Table 3 - Minimum Compliance Standards for F.I.R. 94 Table 5 - List of Acceptable Materials and Compounds • 113 Table 6 - Geometric Means Calculation - Water and Ice 136 v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED THROUGHOUT THE PLANT INSPECTION PROCEDURES (PIP) MANUAL ========================================== ASAP as soon as possible Department refers to the Department of Fisheries & Oceans FIA Fish Inspection Act FIR Fish Inspection Regulations FFMC Freshwater Fish Marketing Corporation FPR Fish Plant Report form HQ (Regional) Headquarters OPMS Operational Performance Measurement System PIP Plant Inspection Procedures manual Reg. registered plant Reg. no. registration number TS team survey UR unregistered fish processing plant II <~ 0::: {.!J 0 0::: 0.. z 0...... I- < 0::: I- ......V) {.!J L1J 0::: I-z <_J 0.. - 1 - PLANT REGISTRATION PROGRAM A) Review Procedures 1) Survey Requisites Section 14 of the FIR states that all processing of fish for export is to be carried out in a registered plant. Plants should not be permitted to process fish for export unless they are in possession of a valid Certification of Registration. NOTE 1: This excludes fisherman-packer operations (where a fisher­ man does his own dressing, packing or icing of fresh fish from his own catch). NOTE 2: Each plant will be reviewed on a management basis so that team surveys will not be carried out if the intention is not to register such a plant. Ability to monitor plant operations and maintenance of sanitation standards at field level are important factors that must be taken into consideration prior to registering any plants. Plants that will be assessed for registration include: a) all processing plants (other than whose which just ice and hold fish) where ownership of the fish changes hands, e.g. where fishermen deliver fish to a plant which takes the fish from the fisherman and the plant then exports the fish directly or delivers to the FFMC. This would include all delivery points and agents of the FFMC. It would not include fishermanpackers or plants that process fish for local sales only. b) those plants whose owners request registration, in writing to the District Office. - 2 - Plants will be considered for team surveys if: a) District and local officers feel that the plant essentially complies to FIR, and that they are able to monitor plant operations and sanitation standards adequately, b) water and ice have been sampled and found to be satisfactory (or water is from an approved municipal source). Plants presently registered will be team surveyed in accordance with Plant Classifications. Fish plants with temporary registration certificates shall be re~-eva l uated prior to the expiry date and wi 11 be team surveyed where extensive renovations have taken place, at District request or Regional request 2) J§!am Survey Procedures Team surveys were initiated to provide a uniform approach to the inspection of fish processing plants and the to implementation of corrective measures. Completed Fish Plant Report (FPR) forms and other reports from the field are used as sources of information for all plants. Any p1ant not team surveyed in a particular year remains subject to continuing vigilance by the local officer who will ensure that such p1ants are reviewed, on a yearly basis, for construction, equipment and operating requirements using the Fish Plant Report form. The team survey form is used in reassessing registered plants for continuance of registration and assessing unregistered plants where it is felt that those plants comply with the FIR and meet the requirements for assessment. Team surveys of fish processing plants will be carried out - 3 - by an inspection team composed of the local inspector and/or district representative and a regional office representative. The field officer will advise on local conditions, plant problems and concerns during the survey. It is also the officer's responsibility to check and ensure that the deficiencies noted during the survey have been corrected and to inform District office of plant progress. The District representative ensures that the local officers are being uniform in their approach during the survey; monitors p·lants in the district and recommends registration or withdrawal to Regional office. The Regional representative is responsible for maintaining a consistent approach to regulatory requirements and to the uniform correction of deficiencies throughout the Region. During the survey the Regional representative will complete the team survey form in conjunction with the district and/or local officers. Where on-site agreement is reached between team members, the Regional representative wi 11 ensure that the pl ant manager receives a copy of the defi ci ,ency list and corrective dates as well as sending a copy of the team survey and a sketch of the plant and equipment layout to the District office. Plant managers are to be advised of the survey intent and procedure prior to commencement of the survey. A team survey will record all plant construction and operational deficiencies as well as noting equipment present, flow of operations and any other details which might be relevant to the decision to issue a registration certificate (e.g. chemical compounds used as disinfectants or pesticides should be included). - 4 - NOTE: Team surveys should be conducted when plants are processing so that operational deficiencies can be recorded. They should be completed as near to the start of the operating season as possible to permit registration to be granted where necessary. Team surveys in a particular area will commence only when the plants are known to be operating since the survey may take considerable time and attention as documentation of construction, equipment, and operational deficiencies must be accurate. It is essential that all deficiencies be noted and recorded so that overlooked deficiencies are not "discovered" at a later date. The observations of team survey personnel are recorded on the Team Survey Form (see Figure 1). Photographs are an integral part of the team survey and follow-up inspections and should be taken of the plant exterior and interior, including the basic processing area, equipment, processing activities and specific deficiencies observed. Photos are labelled to correspond to a diagramatic sketch of the plant in order to show plant layout flow of production and operations. The deficiencies recorded by the team will be discussed among the members prior to any discussions with management or plant owners. Agreement on the nature of deficiencies, suitable methods and suggested deadlines for their correction will be settled among team members. Where agreement is not reached, the discussion between the team members should be continued away from the plant until settlement is reached. The plant manager should be informed that the deficiency list will be sent out to him and that he is to comply with the correction deadlines. (Items agreed upon by a 11 team representatives are discussed with him before the team departs.) - 5 .. The advantages to leaving a copy of the deficiency list with the plant manager are as follows: - The local inspection and/or District officer has time to read over the deficiency list before discussing the 'list with the plant manager. - It prevents discrepancies due to rewriting of the list whereby the original meaning may be inadvertently changed. - There is the opportunity to discuss the list with the plant manager while all the inspectors are present. - The plant manager has the opportunity to question any wording, phrasing or deficiencies at the time. - Specific deficiencies can actually be pointed out to the manager to avoid misinterpretation. - No new deficiencies are discovered that are written to the plant manager which were not mentioned to him while discussing the deficiency list. - Most important is the time factor. The plant manager already has the list and can begin corrections immect·iately. Major deficiencies are those items which are more conspicuous in effecting product contamination. They generally are not ab.le to be corrected within 30 days. Examples of major deficiencies include: Schedule I - Section 1 - floor cracks (that prevent proper cleaning) in working area floor surfaces Section 3 - drains of insufficient capacity Section 4 - wall cracks Section 5 - inadequate ventilation where humidity and odour pose an obvious problem - 6 - Section 8 - no handwash or hand dip facilities Section 9 - unsafe, unsanitary water Section 11 - surfaces of porous material Section 16 - cracked, chipped ceilings with open joints NOTE: Suspected structural defects should immediately be brought to the attention of the plant owner/manager and reported to the District Manager for consultation with the Regional Inspection Engineer. Minor deficiencies can generally be corrected within 30 days. ·All unsanitary operating practices may be major in effect, but can be considered as minor for survey purposes where the deficiencies can be corrected immediately.
Recommended publications
  • Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser Fulvescens) in Canada
    Information in Support of the 2017 COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) in Canada Cameron C. Barth, Duncan Burnett, Craig A. McDougall, and Patrick A. Nelson North/South Consultants Inc. 83 Scurfield Boulevard Winnipeg, Manitoba R3Y 1G4 2018 Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 3166 Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Manuscript reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which deals with national or regional problems. Distribution is restricted to institutions or individuals located in particular regions of Canada. However, no restriction is placed on subject matter, and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Manuscript reports may be cited as full publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in the data base Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts. Manuscript reports are produced regionally but are numbered nationally. Requests for individual reports will be filled by the issuing establishment listed on the front cover and title page. Numbers 1-900 in this series were issued as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Biological Board of Canada, and subsequent to 1937 when the name of the Board was changed by Act of Parliament, as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 1426 - 1550 were issued as Department of Fisheries and Environment, Fisheries and Marine Service Manuscript Reports. The current series name was changed with report number 1551. Rapport manuscrit canadien des sciences halieutiques et aquatiques Les rapports manuscrits contiennent des renseignements scientifiques et techniques qui constituent une contribution aux connaissances actuelles, mais qui traitent de problèmes nationaux ou régionaux.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Sturgeon, Acipenser Fulvescens, in a Large Canadian River
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Lake Sturgeon Acipenser fulvescens Western Hudson Bay populations Saskatchewan-Nelson River populations Southern Hudson Bay-James Bay populations Great Lakes-Upper St. Lawrence populations in Canada Western Hudson Bay populations - ENDANGERED Saskatchewan-Nelson River populations - ENDANGERED Southern Hudson Bay-James Bay populations - SPECIAL CONCERN Great Lakes-Upper St. Lawrence populations - THREATENED 2017 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2017. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Lake Sturgeon Acipenser fulvescens, Western Hudson Bay populations, Saskatchewan-Nelson River populations, Southern Hudson Bay- James Bay populations and Great Lakes-Upper St. Lawrence populations in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xxx + 153 pp. (http://www.registrelep- sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Previous report(s): COSEWIC 2006. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the lake sturgeon Acipenser fulvescens in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 107 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Houston, J.J.P. 1986. COSEWIC status report on the lake sturgeon Acipenser fulvescens in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-32 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Cam Barth, Patrick Nelson and Craig McDougall of North/South Consultants Inc. for writing the status report on the Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens), in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment and Climate Change Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Nicholas Mandrak, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Freshwater Fishes Specialist Subcommittee.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology Manitoba
    102 60 23a 31a Little 24b 31 100 31a 31 Haider 98 NUNAVUT 96 Goose Lake 31 23a Putahow 26 Nueltin Head R 60 Ballantyne L 31 20 23b Egg iver Lopuck 31 31 Lake 24b 31 Baralzon Commonwealth Falloon 31 23b MAJOR GEOLOGICAL SUBDIVISIONS L Partridge Todd 23b 20 19a 31 Lake 31d 31 Lake 19a 24b Putahow Is 19a 31 20 Strachan 26c 31a Blevins 19a Nabel Lake L Lake Lake 19a Coutts 23a Veal 31 23b Lake 23b 23b Lake Lake 20 31 Lake 24b Lake Savage 19a O O O Tice 19a 0 0 0 26c Hutton 23b Lake 20 100 96 92 24b 23b 19a 31a Lake Lake 31 Dickens R Bulloch Nahili 31d 31 Colvin John Lake 19a 19a 23b R Nunavut Lake 24b 31 31 24b Gronbeck y 31 Koona Osborne 31b Round Thuytowayasa 30a 23a L 24b L 20 L 19a Jonasson 26 Gillander Lake 26c Inverarity Sand 31 Bangle 23b 19a 23b Lake 23b L Kasmere Lake MUDJATIK NEJANILINI 0 50 100 150 200 250 Lake 23b Lake Lake 31b 23b 19a Kitchen 31 24b Drake Ewing 31 23b McEwen 20 Sucker L Guick Ashey 31 Lake 19a 20 Kirk L KILOMETRES 31 31 26c Lake 23b 23b O Lake 0 Shannon Lake 26 Gagnon Vinsky SEAL RIVER GREAT 59 24b 24b Nejanilini O WOLLASTON 23b L Hanna 59 0 Secter Sandy Turner 31 23b Lake 23b Lake 31c Butterworth23b L Lake L Lake Corbett 24b 19 19a 31c 31a 26 Churchill 23b Lake Croll 31 23b 23b Ck Lake 31d,23b Creba 26 26 Seal River ISLAND L 24b 31 19a 30a Kasmere Lake 19a Falls Tatowaycho 29a Lake 19a Creek L Caribou River Park Reserve 23b Grevstad 26c 26c 31d 24b H U D S O N 31d Thlewiaza 24b Caribou La Bartko 26 River ke Hillhouse 24b Lake Booth Little 31b Long Snyder Bambridge 23b C H I P E W Y A N Lake MacMillian Lake Duck
    [Show full text]
  • By HFNICHOLSON Great Lakes Biolimnol
    BIBLIOGRAPHY -ON THE LIMNOLOGY AND FISHERIES. OF CANADIAN FRESHWATERS. NO .''5 (REVISED). by H.F.NICHOLSON Great Lakes Biolimnology Laboratory, Canada Centre for Inland Waters, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, Ontario. L7R 4A6 PREFACE This is a revised edition of Bibliography No.5, published in 1978 as Fish. Environm.Can., Fish.Mar.Serv., Techn.Rept., (804). Due to budget restrictions and the high cost of printing, combined with an expanding distribution list, it is no longer possible to publish this series as Technical Reports. Instead, each number will be issued in this present looseleaf form as an unpublished report of the Great Lakes Biolimnology Laboratory. Please note that those from outside Canada requesting copies of this series will be sent the Reference Indexes only. However, the Canadian Freshwater Features Section will be sent if specifically requested. This issue can be referenced as:- Nicholson, H.F. 1982. "Bibliography on the limnology and fisheries of Canadian freshwaters. No.5(revised)". Can.Dept.Fish.Oceans, Pacific & Freshw.Fish., Great Lakes Biolimnol.Lab., Unpubl.Rept. FORMAT The bibliography is divided into two sections:- (1). Reference Index Each of these references contains information on the limnology and fisheries of Canadian freshwaters. They are numbered and appear in numerical order. This enumeration is consecutive and continuous through the bibliography series. (2). Freshwater Feature Index This section is divided into alphabetical order of provinces and within each province the freshwater feature names are in alphabetical order. The coordinates (in minutes and degrees, latitude and longitude) are given for each feature except for British Columbia where, for the most part, the quadrilateral indexing system is used.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Roads Chemins D'hiver
    -103°00'00" -102°00'00" -101°00'00" -100°00'00" -99°00'00" -98°00'00" -97°00'00" -96°00'00" -95°00'00" -94°00'00" -93°00'00" -92°00'00" -91°00'00" -90°00'00" -89°00'00" -88°00'00" 60°00'00" Has L bala i t t L. l e P P Hai u G der a oose t He r a Bal Lak ad t lantyne L e Nueltin Ri r h . Lopuck i Lak Eg v o e g d Lake Falloon er w Commonwealth L. g Putahow F e Baralzon arnie Lake Strachan Lake Lake Blevins Lake Nabel L. Lake Coutts Veal r Lake Lake T e Lake Lake ice iv Lake Savage R L R Hutton . ake e Nahili Lak Mikolash Krynski D Colvin ke ic Koona Lake Bulloch La k La Lake ins ke Lake John Kapusta Lake R. Osborn Round Gronbeck Thuytowayazay Jonasson Gillander L. Lake Sand L. Bangle Inver Lake L. Kasmere Lake L. arity Lake Sucker Lake Lake Ewing Kitchen McEwen Lake Drake Askey Lake r Lake Lake K ive L. Guick Lake ir L. Secter R k Sand Turner Gagnon Vinsky Butter L. y Corbett Nejanilini H worth L. Lake Shannon Lake Lake L. a Lake nn a C a z Lemmerick reba Lake Croll ia Tatowayc Cr. w Lake ho Lake le L. h Lake Kellas T k L. R ree Lake . o C Grev Kasmere rtk stad a MacMill C Falls B an a Lake ri L. Little H Lake b Snyder illhouse Booth o Bam r Duck u Lake Lake b idge Jethe L.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries and Marine Service Technical Report 911 January 1980
    i Fisheries and Marine Service Technical Report 911 January 1980' BIBLIOGRAPHY ON THE LIMNOLOGY AND FISHERIES OF CANADIAN FRESHWATERS. NO. 6 by H. F. Nicholson Department of Fisheries and Oceans Great Lakes Biolimnology Laboratory Canada Centre for Inlan4 Waters 867 Lakeshore Road Burlington, Ontario L7R 4A6 This is the 23rd Technical Report from the Great Lakes Biolimnology Laboratory ii ©Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1980 Cat. no. Fs 97-6/911 ISSN 0701-7626 Correct citation for this publication: Nicholson, H. F. 1980. Bibliography on the limnology and fisheries· of Canadian freshwaters. No.6. Fish. Mar. Servo Tech. Rep. 911: pages i-vi, 1-105. iii ABSTRACT Nicholson, H. F. 1980. Bibliography on the limnology and fisheries of Canadian freshwaters. No.6. Fish. Mar. Servo Tech. Rep. 911 : pages i-vi, 1-105. This bibliography is the sixth of a continuing series and contains a further 500 references and the Canadian freshwater features to which they refer. Key words: Bibliographies; Canadian Freshwaters. , ,., RESUME Nicholson, H. F. 1980. Bibliography on the limnology and fisheries of Canadian freshwaters. No.6. Fish. Mar. Servo Tech. Rep. 911 : pages i-vi~ 1-105. La pr~sente bibliographie est la sixi~me d'une s$rie permanente; elle contient 500 nouvelles ref{rences et la liste des accidents g~ographiques,d'eau douce auxquels ces derni~res renvoient. Key words: Bibliographies; Eaux douces canadien. iv PREFACE Due to the great replication of feature names in the Canadian Provinces and also to the fact that so many of our lakes, rivers, and streams are as yet unnamed, users of this 'bib1iography should first refer to the relevant Gazetteer of Canada in order to verify both the name and co­ ordinates of the freshwater feature they require.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Geological Field Work 1973
    GP2173 MANITOBA DEPARTMENTOFMlNES. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT MlNES BRANCH GEOLOGICAL PAPER 2173 SUMMARY OF GEOLOGICAL FIELD WORK 1973 1973 Electronic Capture, 2011 The PDF file from which this document was printed was generated by scanning an original copy of the publication. Because the capture method used was 'Searchable Image (Exact)', it was not possible to proofread the resulting file to remove errors resulting from the capture process. Users should therefore verify critical information in an original copy of the publication. "-: ",,\", GP".J73 .! ~.. ", • MANITOBA DEPARTMENTOF MINES. RESOURCES AND ENVfRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT MINES BRANCH GEOLOGICAL PAPER 2173 • • SUMMARY OF GEOLOGICAL FIELD WORK 1973 • 1973 • PREFACE Fieldwork by the' Provincial Geological S'urvey in 1973 resulted inthe consolidation of progress made in the previous two years. and completion ofthe field component for most ofthe current projects. Field work for the three majorregional mapping projects was completed on schedule: a final report on the Kasmere project is now in preparation. and reports on the Burntwood and Greenstones projects will be prepared following completion of data analysis. Geochemical investigations were hampered by continuing delay in the establishment ofnew laboratory facilities. Field sampling. however. was carried out on brine springs in the lake Winnipegosis area and in the Fox and Ruttan Mines. the latter through the courtesy ofSherritt Gordon Mines limited. Sampling and preliminary examination of approximately 80.000 feet ofdiamond driUcore from the Fox River sill was completed. This project. commenced in 1972. comprises the major part ofan ongoing study of the Fox River sill and its en vironment. and was made possible through • the courtesy of The International Nickel Company of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • KSNC Stewardship Plan I June 2016 SUMMARY
    Kischi Sipi Namao Committee Namao (Lake Sturgeon) Stewardship Plan June 2016 PREFACE In 2012, Manitoba Hydro (MH), Keeyask Hydropower Limited Partnership (KHLP), Tataskweyak Cree Nation (TCN), War Lake First Nation (WLFN), York Factory First Nation (YFFN), Fox Lake Cree Nation (FLCN), and Shamattawa First Nation (SFN) entered into the Lower Nelson River Lake Sturgeon Stewardship Agreement (2012). All of the parties to that Agreement recognized that Lake Sturgeon in the Nelson River had been adversely affected by a number of factors and had a common interest in protecting the stock. The Agreement set out objectives for defining and carrying out projects to monitor and increase knowledge of Lake Sturgeon and ultimately to conserve and enhance populations. To meet the objectives of the Agreement, the signatory parties agreed to form, and participate in, the Lower Nelson River Sturgeon Stewardship Committee, which ultimately was renamed the Kischi Sipi Namao Committee (KSNC). The Committee is seen as being complimentary to other Lake Sturgeon co- management activities within the Province. The Committee’s focus includes the Lake Sturgeon populations inhabiting the lower Nelson system from Kelsey Generating Station (GS) to Hudson Bay including tributaries, and the Hayes River system including the Hayes, Gods, and Echoing rivers. The first core activity listed within the Terms of Reference for the Kischi Sipi Namao Committee is to develop a Sturgeon Stewardship Plan that sets overall research, monitoring and enhancement measures, objectives, and strategies for protection and enhancement in the lower Nelson River for the immediate (1-3 years), medium (3-5 years) and long term (greater than 5 years) future.
    [Show full text]