DOCSLIB.ORG

How Earth Got Its Moon April 15, 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How Earth Got Its Moon April 15, 2017 IN HIGH SCHOOLS | EDUCATOR GUIDE NASA April 15, 2017 How Earth Got its Moon April 15, 2017 EDUCATOR GUIDE How Earth Got its Moon About this Issue The article “How Earth got its moon” describes theories of how the Earth’s moon formed. Did it form as the result of a collision with a large protoplanet called Theia, or did multiple impacts create many mini moons that then merged over time? Computer modeling and isotopic analyses provide some data used to support or refute current theories. Scientists are still searching for other moon formation ideas and ways to test them. Students can focus on details in the article, follow connections to earlier articles about the origins of Earth’s moon, explore cross-curricular connections to other major science topics and calculate relevant lunar properties for themselves. Science News for Students provides another Connections version of this article written at a lower Lexile level (7.9 readability score): to Curricula: “How Earth got its moon.” Power Words are defined at the end of the cienceS History of the Earth News for Students article. Computer modeling Thermodynamics Want to introduce your students to an interesting STEM career related to this Geology article? Check out Cool Jobs: Probing Pluto by Science News for Students. Igneous rocks Solar system Women’s contributions to scientific endeavors, including planetary science, Asteroids and meteorites have been the subject of award-winning movies this year including Hidden Angular momentum Centrifugal/centripetal Figures, which focused on African-American mathematicians who were crucial acceleration to the first launch of an American into space orbit. Want to introduce your Gravitational acceleration students to some other women pursuing STEM careers? Check out “A woman’s Isotopes place is in science” in Science News for Students. What’s in this Guide? s Article-Based Observation: These questions focus on reading and content comprehension by draw- ing on information found in the article “How Earth got its moon.” Questions focus on ideas about the origin of Earth’s moon and evidence that supports multiple explanations of its formation. s Quest Through the Archives: With Internet access and your school’s digital access to Science News, your students can use this short section to explore other articles about our moon’s origin as reported by Science News since 1922. s Cross-Curricular Discussion: These questions and extension prompts connect to the article “How Earth got its moon” and encourage students to think in more detail about scientific areas related to the articles. The section is divided roughly by science subdiscipline for educators who would like to focus on one topic area. The extension prompts for each subdiscipline include some that are top- ic-specific and others that are more conceptually advanced. Earth and Space Sciences questions address types of rocks and minerals found on Earth, how they formed and how they might provide clues to the moon’s formation. Physical and Chemical Sciences questions involve defining isotopes and physical applications of measuring isotope ratios. Biological Sciences and Engineering ques- tions concern biomedical applications of certain isotopes and questions regarding isotopic measur- ing techniques and other applications. s Activity: Students can calculate the angular momentum and density of the moon and consider the implications of the results for various theories of the moon’s origin. Standards Alignment Next Generation Science Common Core Earth’s Place in the Universe: History of Earth: HS- ESS1-5, ELA Standards: Reading Informational Text (RI): 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 HS-ESS1-6 Motion and Stability: Forces and Interactions: HS-PS2-2, ELA Standards: Writing (W): 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9 HS-PS2-3, HS-PS2-4 Matter and Its Interactions: HS-PS1-5, HS-PS1-8 ELA Standards: Speaking and Listening (SL): 1, 2, 4, 6 Engineering Design: HS-ETS1-2 ELA Standards: Reading for Literacy in Science and Technical Subjects (RST): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9 ELA Standards: Writing Literacy in History/Social Studies and Science and Technical Subjects (WHST): 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9 April 15, 2017 IN HIGH SCHOOLS How Earth Got its Moon Article-Based Observation Directions: After reading the article “How Earth got its moon,” answer these questions: 1. What was the moon-formation idea proposed in the mid-1970s? 2. Why does the author describe Earth’s moon as an “oddball”? 3. A study in 2001 analyzed rocks collected during the Apollo mission to the moon. How did these lunar rocks support the hypothesis that the moon was formed by multiple impacts and contradict the giant-impact hypothesis? 4. What did planetary scientist Raluca Rufu and her colleagues learn recently that supports the multi-impact hypothesis? Explain how their findings support this hypothesis and why scientists were not able to figure this out previously. 5. According to planetary scientist Nicolas Dauphas, how does the isotopic combination of materials that make up Earth tell a story that supports the idea of a single impact? What does Dauphas say supplied the Earth’s mass? BLACKLINE MASTER 1, P. 1 6. Planetary scientist Sarah Stewart states that we need to test all the new ideas about the moon’s formation. Describe the recent test that used temperature to help explain how the moon formed, and explain which moon-formation idea is consistent with the results. 7. Explain the similarities and differences between the graphic titled “Making moons” and the com- puter simulation images shown below. R. CANUP/SWRI Making moons The multi-impact hypothesis says several small hits sent terrestrial materials into orbit that eventually formed our large moon. First Disk of debris Moonlet drifts Subsequent Disk formation Moonlets merge in impact forms outward impact far-out orbit (Repeat) Millions Days Centuries of years Days Centuries R. RUFU ET AL/NATURE GEOSCIENCE 2017 BLACKLINE MASTER 1, P. 2 April 15, 2017 EDUCATOR GUIDE How Earth Got its Moon Responses to Article-Based Observation 1. What was the moon-formation idea proposed in the mid-1970s? Possible student response: Scien- tists proposed the “giant-impact hypothesis.” According to this idea, a Mars-sized body called Theia collided with the Earth 4.5 billion years ago with such force that debris from both Earth and Theia was thrown into orbit, eventually combining to form the Earth’s moon. 2. Why does the author describe Earth’s moon as an “oddball”? Possible student response: Most of the solar system’s moons orbit gas giant planets that are farther away from the sun than Earth is. Earth’s moon is large compared with the moons of Mars, the only other terrestrial planet with moons. Mars’ moons are small enough to be asteroids that were caught by its gravity, but Earth’s moon is probably too big to have been captured by gravity. 3. A study in 2001 analyzed rocks collected during the Apollo mission to the moon. How did these lunar rocks support the hypothesis that the moon was formed by multiple impacts and contradict the giant-impact hypothesis? Possible student response: The 2001 study of lunar rocks shows that Earth and its moon have identical mixes of oxygen isotopes. If the moon was a mixture of material from the two planets, the moon’s composition should be different than Earth’s. 4. What did planetary scientist Raluca Rufu and her colleagues learn recently that supports the multi-impact hypothesis? Explain how their findings support this hypothesis and why scientists were not able to figure this out previously. Possible student response: When the proposal of multi- ple impacts was first suggested in 1989, the computer power needed to run the necessary simulations was not available. Recently, Rufu and colleagues designed a computer simulation of multiple impacts to Earth. In the simulation, impactors that hit Earth directly transferred energy deep into Earth, send- ing terrestrial material into space. This material combined over centuries to form small moons, and over roughly 100 million years, about 20 small moons merged to form one moon. 5. According to planetary scientist Nicolas Dauphas, how does the isotopic combination of materials that make up Earth tell a story that supports the idea of a single impact? What does Dauphas say supplied the Earth’s mass? Possible student response: Dauphas reported that most of the materi- al making up Earth comes from the same material as a single type of meteorite called an enstatite chondrite. The placement of different elements helped Dauphas develop a timeline showing when different types of space rocks added to the Earth’s mass. For example, iron-loving elements, such as ruthenium, sink deeper into the Earth’s crust. Therefore, any ruthenium near the Earth’s crust likely arrived later in the Earth’s development. The timeline shows that around three-fourths of Earth’s mass came from enstatite chondrite and its precursors. If Theia formed at the same approximate distance from the sun as Earth, its composition would be similar. 6. Planetary scientist Sarah Stewart states that we need to test all the new ideas about the moon’s formation. Describe the recent test that used temperature to help explain how the moon formed, and explain which moon-formation idea is consistent with the results. Possible student response: The moon’s isotopic abundances were compared with that of glasses formed by a nuclear blast. Due to the extremely high temperatures created by the blast, the glasses lacked light isotopes of zinc, which had been leached out. Lunar rocks did not have zinc isotopes either, suggesting they had been exposed to extreme temperatures. Both moon-formation ideas are consistent with this hypothesis. Scientists say that either one large impact or many smaller impacts could have caused high enough temperatures to leach the light zinc isotopes from the rock.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Moons Phases and Tides
    Moon’s Phases and Tides Moon Phases Half of the Moon is always lit up by the sun. As the Moon orbits the Earth, we see different parts of the lighted area. From Earth, the lit portion we see of the moon waxes (grows) and wanes (shrinks). The revolution of the Moon around the Earth makes the Moon look as if it is changing shape in the sky The Moon passes through four major shapes during a cycle that repeats itself every 29.5 days. The phases always follow one another in the same order: New moon Waxing Crescent First quarter Waxing Gibbous Full moon Waning Gibbous Third (last) Quarter Waning Crescent • IF LIT FROM THE RIGHT, IT IS WAXING OR GROWING • IF DARKENING FROM THE RIGHT, IT IS WANING (SHRINKING) Tides • The Moon's gravitational pull on the Earth cause the seas and oceans to rise and fall in an endless cycle of low and high tides. • Much of the Earth's shoreline life depends on the tides. – Crabs, starfish, mussels, barnacles, etc. – Tides caused by the Moon • The Earth's tides are caused by the gravitational pull of the Moon. • The Earth bulges slightly both toward and away from the Moon. -As the Earth rotates daily, the bulges move across the Earth. • The moon pulls strongly on the water on the side of Earth closest to the moon, causing the water to bulge. • It also pulls less strongly on Earth and on the water on the far side of Earth, which results in tides. What causes tides? • Tides are the rise and fall of ocean water.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Astronomical Optics - Observing Exoplanets 2
    Modern Astronomical Optics - Observing Exoplanets 2. Brief Introduction to Exoplanets Olivier Guyon - [email protected] – Jim Burge, Phil Hinz WEBSITE: www.naoj.org/staff/guyon → Astronomical Optics Course » → Observing Exoplanets (2012) Definitions – types of exoplanets Planet (& exoplanet) definitions are recent, as, prior to discoveries of exoplanets around other stars and dwarf planets in our solar system, there was no need to discuss lower and upper limits of planet masses. Asteroid < dwarf planet < planet < brown dwarf < star Upper limit defined by its mass: < 13 Jupiter mass 1 Jupiter mass = 317 Earth mass = 1/1000 Sun mass Mass limit corresponds to deuterium limit: a planet is not sufficiently massive to start nuclear fusion reactions, of which deuterium burning is the easiest (lowest temperature) Lower limit recently defined (now excludes Pluto) for our solar system: has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit Distinction between giant planets (massive, large, mostly gas) and rocky planets also applies to exoplanets Habitable planet: planet on which life as we know it (bacteria, planets or animals) could be sustained = rocky + surface temperature suitable for liquid water Formation Planet and stars form (nearly) together, within first few x10 Myr of system formation Gravitational collapse of gas + dust cloud Star is formed at center of disk Planets form in the protoplanetary disk Planet embrios form first Adaptive Optics image of Beta Pic Large embrios (> few Earth mass) can Shows planet + debris disk accrete large quantity of
    [Show full text]
  • Orbit and Spin
    Orbit and Spin Overview: A whole-body activity that explores the relative sizes, distances, orbit, and spin of the Sun, Earth, and Moon. Target Grade Level: 3-5 Estimated Duration: 2 40-minute sessions Learning Goals: Students will be able to… • compare the relative sizes of the Earth, Moon, and Sun. • contrast the distance between the Earth and Moon to the distance between the Earth and Sun. • differentiate between the motions of orbit and spin. • demonstrate the spins of the Earth and the Moon, as well as the orbits of the Earth around the Sun, and the Moon around the Earth. Standards Addressed: Benchmarks (AAAS, 1993) The Physical Setting, 4A: The Universe, 4B: The Earth National Science Education Standards (NRC, 1996) Physical Science, Standard B: Position and motion of objects Earth and Space Science, Standard D: Objects in the sky, Changes in Earth and sky Table of Contents: Background Page 1 Materials and Procedure 5 What I Learned… Science Journal Page 14 Earth Picture 15 Sun Picture 16 Moon Picture 17 Earth Spin Demonstration 18 Moon Orbit Demonstration 19 Extensions and Adaptations 21 Standards Addressed, detailed 22 Background: Sun The Sun is the center of our Solar System, both literally—as all of the planets orbit around it, and figuratively—as its rays warm our planet and sustain life as we know it. The Sun is very hot compared to temperatures we usually encounter. Its mean surface temperature is about 9980° Fahrenheit (5800 Kelvin) and its interior temperature is as high as about 28 million° F (15,500,000 Kelvin).
    [Show full text]
  • Dwarf Planet Ceres
    Dwarf Planet Ceres drishtiias.com/printpdf/dwarf-planet-ceres Why in News As per the data collected by NASA’s Dawn spacecraft, dwarf planet Ceres reportedly has salty water underground. Dawn (2007-18) was a mission to the two most massive bodies in the main asteroid belt - Vesta and Ceres. Key Points 1/3 Latest Findings: The scientists have given Ceres the status of an “ocean world” as it has a big reservoir of salty water underneath its frigid surface. This has led to an increased interest of scientists that the dwarf planet was maybe habitable or has the potential to be. Ocean Worlds is a term for ‘Water in the Solar System and Beyond’. The salty water originated in a brine reservoir spread hundreds of miles and about 40 km beneath the surface of the Ceres. Further, there is an evidence that Ceres remains geologically active with cryovolcanism - volcanoes oozing icy material. Instead of molten rock, cryovolcanoes or salty-mud volcanoes release frigid, salty water sometimes mixed with mud. Subsurface Oceans on other Celestial Bodies: Jupiter’s moon Europa, Saturn’s moon Enceladus, Neptune’s moon Triton, and the dwarf planet Pluto. This provides scientists a means to understand the history of the solar system. Ceres: It is the largest object in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter. It was the first member of the asteroid belt to be discovered when Giuseppe Piazzi spotted it in 1801. It is the only dwarf planet located in the inner solar system (includes planets Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars). Scientists classified it as a dwarf planet in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • How Earth Got Its Moon Article
    FEATURE How Earth Got its MOON Standard formation tale may need a rewrite By Thomas Sumner he moon’s origin story does not add up. Most “Multiple impacts just make more sense,” says planetary scientists think that the moon formed in the earli- scientist Raluca Rufu of the Weizmann Institute of Science in est days of the solar system, around 4.5 billion years Rehovot, Israel. “You don’t need this one special impactor to Tago, when a Mars-sized protoplanet called Theia form the moon.” whacked into the young Earth. The collision sent But Theia shouldn’t be left on the cutting room floor just debris from both worlds hurling into orbit, where the rubble yet. Earth and Theia were built largely from the same kind of eventually mingled and combined to form the moon. material, new research suggests, and so had similar composi- If that happened, scientists expect that Theia’s contribution tions. There is no sign of “other” material on the moon, this would give the moon a different composition from Earth’s. perspective holds, because nothing about Theia was different. Yet studies of lunar rocks show that Earth and its moon are “I’m absolutely on the fence between these two opposing compositionally identical. That fact throws a wrench into the ideas,” says UCLA cosmochemist Edward Young. Determining planet-on-planet impact narrative. which story is correct is going to take more research. But the Researchers have been exploring other scenarios. Maybe answer will offer profound insights into the evolution of the the Theia impact never happened (there’s no direct evidence early solar system, Young says.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rings and Inner Moons of Uranus and Neptune: Recent Advances and Open Questions
    Workshop on the Study of the Ice Giant Planets (2014) 2031.pdf THE RINGS AND INNER MOONS OF URANUS AND NEPTUNE: RECENT ADVANCES AND OPEN QUESTIONS. Mark R. Showalter1, 1SETI Institute (189 Bernardo Avenue, Mountain View, CA 94043, mshowal- [email protected]! ). The legacy of the Voyager mission still dominates patterns or “modes” seem to require ongoing perturba- our knowledge of the Uranus and Neptune ring-moon tions. It has long been hypothesized that numerous systems. That legacy includes the first clear images of small, unseen ring-moons are responsible, just as the nine narrow, dense Uranian rings and of the ring- Ophelia and Cordelia “shepherd” ring ε. However, arcs of Neptune. Voyager’s cameras also first revealed none of the missing moons were seen by Voyager, sug- eleven small, inner moons at Uranus and six at Nep- gesting that they must be quite small. Furthermore, the tune. The interplay between these rings and moons absence of moons in most of the gaps of Saturn’s rings, continues to raise fundamental dynamical questions; after a decade-long search by Cassini’s cameras, sug- each moon and each ring contributes a piece of the gests that confinement mechanisms other than shep- story of how these systems formed and evolved. herding might be viable. However, the details of these Nevertheless, Earth-based observations have pro- processes are unknown. vided and continue to provide invaluable new insights The outermost µ ring of Uranus shares its orbit into the behavior of these systems. Our most detailed with the tiny moon Mab. Keck and Hubble images knowledge of the rings’ geometry has come from spanning the visual and near-infrared reveal that this Earth-based stellar occultations; one fortuitous stellar ring is distinctly blue, unlike any other ring in the solar alignment revealed the moon Larissa well before Voy- system except one—Saturn’s E ring.
    [Show full text]
  • The Solar System Cause Impact Craters
    ASTRONOMY 161 Introduction to Solar System Astronomy Class 12 Solar System Survey Monday, February 5 Key Concepts (1) The terrestrial planets are made primarily of rock and metal. (2) The Jovian planets are made primarily of hydrogen and helium. (3) Moons (a.k.a. satellites) orbit the planets; some moons are large. (4) Asteroids, meteoroids, comets, and Kuiper Belt objects orbit the Sun. (5) Collision between objects in the Solar System cause impact craters. Family portrait of the Solar System: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, (Eris, Ceres, Pluto): My Very Excellent Mother Just Served Us Nine (Extra Cheese Pizzas). The Solar System: List of Ingredients Ingredient Percent of total mass Sun 99.8% Jupiter 0.1% other planets 0.05% everything else 0.05% The Sun dominates the Solar System Jupiter dominates the planets Object Mass Object Mass 1) Sun 330,000 2) Jupiter 320 10) Ganymede 0.025 3) Saturn 95 11) Titan 0.023 4) Neptune 17 12) Callisto 0.018 5) Uranus 15 13) Io 0.015 6) Earth 1.0 14) Moon 0.012 7) Venus 0.82 15) Europa 0.008 8) Mars 0.11 16) Triton 0.004 9) Mercury 0.055 17) Pluto 0.002 A few words about the Sun. The Sun is a large sphere of gas (mostly H, He – hydrogen and helium). The Sun shines because it is hot (T = 5,800 K). The Sun remains hot because it is powered by fusion of hydrogen to helium (H-bomb). (1) The terrestrial planets are made primarily of rock and metal.
    [Show full text]
  • GCSE Astronomy Course Sample N Section 3 Topic 2 N the Moon’S Orbit
    Sample of the GCSE Astronomy Course from Section 3 Topic 2 The Moon’s orbit Introduction We can see that the Moon changes its appearance by the day. In this topic you will study the orbit of the Moon and the changes that this brings about. You will learn about the phases of the Moon, why you can only see one side of the Moon from Earth, and what gives rise to our ability to see a small fraction of the far side. You will probably need 2 hours to complete this topic. Objectives When you have completed this topic you will be able to: n explain the rotation and revolution (orbit) of the Moon n describe the phases of the lunar cycle n explain the synchronous nature of the Moon’s orbit and rotation n explain the causes of lunar libration and its effect on the visibility of the lunar disc. Rotation and orbit of the Moon The Moon rotates about its axis in 27.3 days. The Moon orbits round the Earth in a period which is also 27.3 days. This means that we only see one side of the Moon (around 59 per cent of the lunar disc). The axis of the Moon has a slight tilt. The Moon’s equator is tilted by 1.5° to the plane of its orbit around the Earth. You may recall from Section 2 that the plane in which the Earth orbits the Sun is called the ecliptic. The plane of the Moon’s orbit is 5.1° to the ecliptic and the orbit is elliptical.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf [35] Ghoddousi-Fard, R
    International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2021, 11, 343-369 https://www.scirp.org/journal/ijaa ISSN Online: 2161-4725 ISSN Print: 2161-4717 Updating the Historical Perspective of the Interaction of Gravitational Field and Orbit in Sun-Planet-Moon System Yin Zhu Agriculture Department of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China How to cite this paper: Zhu, Y. (2021) Abstract Updating the Historical Perspective of the Interaction of Gravitational Field and Orbit Studying the two famous old problems that why the moon can move around in Sun-Planet-Moon System. International the Sun and why the orbit of the Moon around the Earth cannot be broken Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, = 2 11, 343-369. off by the Sun under the condition calculating with F GMm R , the at- https://doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2021.113016 tractive force of the Sun on the Moon is almost 2.2 times that of the Earth, we found that the planet and moon are unified as one single gravitational unit Received: May 17, 2021 2 Accepted: July 20, 2021 which results in that the Sun cannot have the force of F= GMm R on the Published: July 23, 2021 moon. The moon is moved by the gravitational unit orbiting around the Sun. It could indicate that the gravitational field of the moon is limited inside the Copyright © 2021 by author(s) and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. unit and the gravitational fields of both the planet and moon are unified as This work is licensed under the Creative one single field interacting with the Sun.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PENNY MOON and QUARTER EARTH School Adapted from a Physics Forum Activity At
    ~ LPI EDUCATION/PUBLIC OUTREACH SCIENCE ACTIVITIES ~ Ages: 5th grade – high THE PENNY MOON AND QUARTER EARTH school Adapted from a Physics Forum activity at: http://www.phvsicsforums.com/ Duration: 10 minutes OVERVIEW — The students will use a penny and a quarter to model the Moon’s rotation on its axis and Materials: revolution around the Earth, and demonstrate that the Moon keeps the same face toward One penny and one the Earth. quarter per pair of students OBJECTIVE — Overhead projector, or The students will: elmo, or video Demonstrate the motion of the Moon’s rotation and revolution. projector Compare what we would see of the Moon if it did not rotate to what we see when its period of rotation is the same as its orbital period. Projected image of student overhead BEFORE YOU START: Do not introduce this topic along with the reason for lunar phases; students may become confused and assume that the Moon’s rotation is related to its phases. Prepare to show the student overhead projected for the class to see. ACTIVITY — 1. Ask your students to describe which parts of the Moon they see. Does the Moon turn? Can we see its far side? Allow time for your students to discuss this and share their opinions. 2. Hand out the pennies and quarters so that each pair of students has both. Tell the students that they will be creating a model of the Earth and Moon. Which object is Earth? [the quarter] Which one is the Moon? [the penny] 3. Turn on the projected student overhead.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimization Studies of the CERN-ISOLDE Neutron Converter and Fission Target System
    Optimization Studies of the CERN-ISOLDE neutron converter and fission target system Raul Luís1, José G. Marques, Thierry Stora, Pedro Vaz, Luca Zanini 1ITN – Estrada Nacional 10, 2686-953, Sacavém, Portugal 2CERN – CH-1211, Genève 23, Switzerland 3PSI – 5232 Villigen, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The ISOLDE facility at CERN has been one of the leading isotope separator on-line (ISOL) facilities worldwide since it became operative in 1967. More than 1000 isotopes are available at ISOLDE, produced after the bombardment of various primary targets with a pulsed proton beam of energy 1.4 GeV and an average intensity of 2 μA. A tungsten solid neutron converter has been used for ten years to produce neutron-rich fission fragments in UCx targets. In this work, the Monte Carlo code FLUKA and the cross section codes TALYS and ABRABLA were used to study the current layout of the neutron converter and fission target system of the ISOLDE facility. An optimized target system layout is proposed, which maximizes the production of neutron-rich isotopes and reduces the contamination by undesired proton-rich isobars. The studies here reported can already be applied to ISOLDE and will be of special relevance for the future facilities HIE-ISOLDE and EURISOL. 1. Introduction One of the most efficient ways to study nuclei far from stability is the Isotope Separation On-Line (ISOL) method, in which a beam of high-energy hadrons hits a thick target, producing a great variety of radioactive products through different processes like fission, spallation and fragmentation [1]. The resulting nuclides can be studied after they are extracted from the target, ionized and mass separated.
    [Show full text]
  • Moon-Earth-Sun: the Oldest Three-Body Problem
    Moon-Earth-Sun: The oldest three-body problem Martin C. Gutzwiller IBM Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598 The daily motion of the Moon through the sky has many unusual features that a careful observer can discover without the help of instruments. The three different frequencies for the three degrees of freedom have been known very accurately for 3000 years, and the geometric explanation of the Greek astronomers was basically correct. Whereas Kepler’s laws are sufficient for describing the motion of the planets around the Sun, even the most obvious facts about the lunar motion cannot be understood without the gravitational attraction of both the Earth and the Sun. Newton discussed this problem at great length, and with mixed success; it was the only testing ground for his Universal Gravitation. This background for today’s many-body theory is discussed in some detail because all the guiding principles for our understanding can be traced to the earliest developments of astronomy. They are the oldest results of scientific inquiry, and they were the first ones to be confirmed by the great physicist-mathematicians of the 18th century. By a variety of methods, Laplace was able to claim complete agreement of celestial mechanics with the astronomical observations. Lagrange initiated a new trend wherein the mathematical problems of mechanics could all be solved by the same uniform process; canonical transformations eventually won the field. They were used for the first time on a large scale by Delaunay to find the ultimate solution of the lunar problem by perturbing the solution of the two-body Earth-Moon problem.
    [Show full text]