Queensland's Cold Warrior: the Turbulent Days Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Legislative Assembly Hansard 1950
Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly TUESDAY, 22 AUGUST 1950 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy 120 Questions. [ASSEMBLY.] Questions. TUESDAY, 22 AUGUST, 1950. Hon. P. J. R. HILTON (Carnarvon) replied- Mr. SPEAKER (Hon. S. J. Brassington, "At 31 July, 1950-(a) 683, (b) 102, Fortitude Valley) took the chair at 11 a.m. (c) 96." QUESTIONS. STATE HOUSING CONTRACTS PRACTICE. WORK ON BURDEKIN DAM SITE. 1\'Ir. NICKLIN (Landsborough-Leader of the Opposition) asked the Secretary for 1Ur. AIKENS (Mundingburra) asked the Public Works, Housing and Local Govern Premier- ment- '' How many people are employed at the Burclekin clam site and what work are they '' 1. Is it a fact that in respect of performing~'' materials and fittings supplied by the State Housing Commission to its contractors, a Hon. E. lU. HANLON (Ithaca) replied- charge of 12i per cent. on cost is made' " Excluding the activities of the Clare If not, what percentage on cost is charged f War Service Land Settlement Scheme, 63 '' 2. Is it a fact that the commission men are employed in the area of the Burde insists on making all payments due to sub kin River Project. They are engaged on contractors~ If so, what is the reason for diamond drilling to test foundations at the such practice f'' site of the main storage clam and the diversion clam sitP; making, a det,ailed Hon. P. J. R. HILTON (Carnarvon) survey to determine the exact site of the replied- diversion dam; locating the access road '' 1. Yes; on purchase price to cover between Ravenswood and the Burdekin inward and outward handling and storage Falls Dam and an aciless road to the costs. -
INAUGURAL SPEECH Mr SKELTON (Nicklin—ALP) (11.18 Am): I Would Like to Begin by Acknowledging the First Nation People on Whose Land We Meet: the Turrbal People
Speech By Robert Skelton MEMBER FOR NICKLIN Record of Proceedings, 1 December 2020 INAUGURAL SPEECH Mr SKELTON (Nicklin—ALP) (11.18 am): I would like to begin by acknowledging the First Nation people on whose land we meet: the Turrbal people. I also acknowledge the Kabi Kabi people, whose land I am honoured to speak of in this place, and I pay my respects to their leaders past, present and emerging. I was born an Army brat and spent my early life travelling around the country with my family and sister Cassandra as my father, Robert, served. My mother, Yvonne, also imbued in me a sense of duty and honour, so in 1995 after finishing school in Townsville I joined the Navy so that I, too, could serve my country. My naval career saw me serve as a boatswain’s mate on HMAS Swan, HMAS Canberra and HMAS Ipswich. I later had an educational posting at the gunnery range at HMAS Cerberus. In 2002 I transferred to RAAF Base Amberley to train as an aviation firefighter. I then served at RAAF Base Tindal. My time in the services taught me the importance of comradeship, teamwork, improvisation and a love of, and duty to, country. During this time my wife, Rachel, and I had a young family. I have three beautiful children: Brandt, Delaney and Jamison. All three were born thousands of kilometres apart in Cairns, Frankston and Katherine respectively. I also had the good fortune of adopting Ray and Sandra Hubbard and John and Julie Aldous as parents somewhere along the way. -
The History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989
6. The oppositional parties in the Parliament, 1957–1968 Parliamentary opposition to the Nicklin government came from a host of diverse players in the decade between August 1957 and January 1968. Especially after the Labor split of 1957, opponents of the Coalition government were a dispirited and dishevelled band, most of whom appeared as individualistic dissidents. Each had their own particular fights to fight and wars to wage. Each had different enemies in sight. Labor’s Jack Duggan and the QLP’s Ted Walsh never spoke to each other again privately after the split, despite afterwards sitting together in the Assembly for more than a decade, and frequently interjecting against each other. Adversarialism was not only a matter of formal battlelines drawn across the Chamber. Indeed, some of the most intense acrimony was found within the oppositional groups among remaining members who survived the 1957 split. If occasional internal conflicts simmered through the government side of politics, they at least demonstrated the capacity to remain in office while enjoying the comforts and trappings of power. The circumstance of being in government was sufficient to instil a collective solidarity between the Coalition parties, which was evident most strongly in the ministry. In contrast, the oppositional members were far more fragmented and querulous. They demonstrated little prospect of ever forming a single cohesive opposition. Indeed, after only one term in government, the Liberals were describing Labor as the weakest opposition in Queensland’s political history. Only towards the mid-1960s did the Labor opposition gradually develop any coherence and commitment of purpose. -
The Ayes Have It: the History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989
7. The Pizzey–Chalk interlude, 1968 With the retirement of Frank Nicklin as Premier in January 1968, the Queensland Parliament entered a period of turbulence and uncertainty. Nicklin had been the leader of the Country Party continuously since June 1941, accumulating a total of 26.5 years at the helm. He had been Premier for 10.5 years and had governed the state competently and conscientiously. He had stamped his own personal integrity and probity on the character of the government and had quietly maintained a guiding hand over the cabinet and party room. In the Parliament, he was uniformly held in high regard not only by his own Country Party colleagues but by his Coalition partners and members of the opposition. He had maintained a sense of decency in the Assembly that was recognised by friend and foe alike. At the time of his retirement, Nicklin had attained many parliamentary achievements, not the least of which was the general acceptance of the Coalition parties as the natural parties of government. He had also, perhaps more conscientiously, sustained the Country Party as the dominant party in the Coalition despite consistently polling fewer votes than the largely urban-based Liberal Party. Nicklin’s retirement at seventy-two years of age was not exactly a surprise; it had been expected for some time. His health and energy were waning and he had spent some weeks in hospital during the final months of his record- breaking premiership. It was widely believed that Nicklin had hung on to the job for so long simply to beat the previous record of Labor’s Forgan Smith as the longest-serving premier (Forgan Smith had served 10 years and three months). -
The History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989
9. The slide towards uncertainty, 1969–1972 The Parliament resumed after a break of seven and a half months—a relatively long intermission but by no means unusual in those days. When an election was due in the new year (from March to June), it was common practice for the Parliament to adjourn in late November or early December (before Christmas) and to not reconvene for another six to eight months. This was the pattern followed throughout the 1940s to the mid-1950s and again from 1962 to 1972. The thirty-ninth Parliament would run from 5 August 1969 to 10 December 1971 (202 sitting days in the three-year term or 67 days a year) and not meet again before the May 1972 election. It was the last Parliament to meet with 78 members and, for the first time since winning government, the Coalition governed with a reduced majority. Under Nicklin, the Coalition’s majority had risen from nine in 1957 to 10 in 1960, to 14 in 1963 and 16 in 1966, but fell back to just 12 after the 1969 election—Bjelke-Petersen’s first electoral test as leader. With the benefit of hindsight, it is clear the 1969–72 Parliament was to become Labor’s high-water mark in its period in opposition, when for a few years it posed a credible challenge to the government. It was also a period when the Premier was at his most vulnerable politically—a condition deeply troubling to his own party colleagues, who would eventually be incited to rebel against his leadership. -
'To Fight Against the Horrible Evil of Communism': Catholics, Community and the Movement in Rockhampton, 1943-1957 Barbara Webst
'To fight against the horrible evil of Communism': Catholics, Community and the Movement in Rockhampton, 1943-1957 Barbara Webster* During the 1940s and 1950s, Rockhampton had the reputation of being one of the 1 foremost centres of organised anti-communist activity undertaken predominantly by the Catholic Church and its clandestine industrial organisation, the Movement. Historians have not explained this particular phenomenon nor have they undertaken much research into the post-World War II anti-communist hysteria in regional Australia in general. This article aims to redress this omission in Australian labour historiography by exploring the origin, organisation and operation of the Movement in Rockhampton. It locates the roots of Rockhampton's reputation as a 'hotbed' of Movement activity in the particular socio-economic, political, demographic and cultural characteristics of the city in general and of the Catholic community in particular. It demonstrates the role of 'community', both subjectively and structurally, in mobilising Catholics against communism and the significance of 'place' in the production of community identity and maintenance of authority. On 3 October 1956, the front page of the Morning Bulletin informed the citizens of the Central Queensland city of Rockhampton: Police were summoned to the Rockhampton Trades Hall last night when, marching in a body down the centre of the hall, left wing industrial union delegates took over control of a Trades and Labour Council meeting to climax the most amazing scenes in the council's history.1 In the six months following that dramatic night in Trades Hall, the local union movement found itself in the absurd position of possessing two peak industrial bodies – the 'Old' Rockhampton Trades and Labour Council (RTLC) which had originally formed in 1938 and the 'New' RTLC. -
Legislative Assembly Hansard 1982
Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly TUESDAY, 26 OCTOBER 1982 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy Mmisterial Statements 26 October 1982 1701 TUESDAY, 26 OCTOBER 1982 Mr SPEAKER (Hon. S. J. MuUer, Fassifern) read prayers and took the chair at 11 a.m. ASSENT TO BILLS Assent to the foUowing Bills reported by Mr Speaker:— Oty of Brisbane Town Planning Ad Amendment BiU; Distrid and Magistrates Courts Acts and Property Law Ad Amendment Bill; Constmction Safdy Regulations Interprdation BUI; Supreme Court Acts Amendment BUI. AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORT Brisbane City Coimcil Accounts Mr SPEAKER announced the receipt from the Auditor-General of his report on the books and accounts of the Brisbane City CouncU for the year ended 30 June 1982. Ordered to be printed. PAPERS The following paper was laid on the table, and ordered to be printed:— Report of the Department of Aboriginal and Islanders Advancement for the year ended 30 June 1982. The following papers were laid on the table:— Orders in Coundl under— , Supreme Court Act 1921-1979 Water Ad 1926-1981 and the Statutory Bodies Financial Arrangements Act 1982 Harbours Act 1955-1982 Eledricity Act 1976-1982 and the Statutory Bodies Finandal Arrangements Act 1982 Mines Regulation Act 1964-1979 Ordinance under the City of Brisbane Act 1924-1980 Reports— Legal Aid Commission of Queensland for the year ended 30 June 1982 Umber Research and DevdOpment Advisory Coundl of North Queensland for the year ended 30 June 1982 Timber Research and Development Advisory Council of South and Central Queens land for the year ended 30 June 1982. -
Legislative Assembly Hansard 1968
Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly TUESDAY, 29 OCTOBER 1968 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy Local Government Act, &c., Bill [29 OcTOBER] Questions 1013 TUESDAY, 29 OCTOBER, 1968 Mr. SPEAKER (Hon. D. E. Nicholson, Murrumba) read prayers and took the chair at 11 a.m. QUESTIONS NEW OFFICE ACCOMMODATION, BALMORAL STATE HIGH SCHOOL Mr. Houston, pursuant to notice, asked The Minister for Education,- Has the Principal of Balmoral State High School made application for new accommodation for himself and staff? If so, has his request been investigated and when will the accommodation be provided? Answer:- " A request has been received for the provision of improved office accommoda tion at the Balmoral State High School. This request is being considered in the Architectural Branch of the Department of Works, but no indication can be given, at present, as to when the accommodation in question will be provided." INSTALLATION OF SPRINKLER FIRE ALARMS IN GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS Mr. Donald for Mr. Bromley, pursuant to notice, asked The Minister for Works,- ( 1) As it is policy not to insure Govern ment buildings, will the new buildings being constructed for the Government be fitted with sprinkler fire alarms? (2) For the same reason as well as for safety purposes, will schools being built or constructed in the future have sprinkler fire alarms installed? ( 3) If the Answers to Questions (1 ) and (2) are in the negative, what is the reason? ( 4) What was the cost to the State of the Supreme Court fire and any other fires in Government buildings or schools during the last three years? Answers: (1) "No." (2) "It is not proposed to install sprinkler fire alarms in these buildings." (3) "Adequate provlSlons for egress from buildings are made and fire alarms where considered to be necessary are installed." ( 4) "A system of keeping up to date valuations of buildings and their contents would serve no useful purpose and the incurring of the considerable expense that would be involved could not be justified. -
The Ayes Have It: the History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989
17 . Conclusion: do the ‘ayes’ have it? The Queensland Parliament is an inherently political and adversarial institution— vibrant in some areas, moribund in others. Under the Constitution, it is principally its own ‘boss’ and has all the strengths and weaknesses that concept implies. If perhaps not Australia’s most reformist parliamentary institution, it nevertheless is not a static institution in any way. It changes over time as circumstances change; it is refreshed with new personnel and procedures; it can be analytical or banal; it can display prudence or excess; it can be characterised by goodwill or enmity; it can be a workhorse or it can be symbolic. In many ways, parliament is a mirror of society, reflecting its values, visions and apprehensions. It consists of elected members who represent specific constituencies at the local level and who share the concerns and biases of those communities. Parliament can also react to itself and become self-referential, and it will take heed of coverage of itself and its activities by the media and react to changing attitudes and the expectations of the wider community. Parliament is an important part of the political system, but it is only one part of that system. Although it considers itself supreme, it has rivals and combatants and other institutions vying for attention. The other components of the political system include the executive, which sits in and dominates the Parliament but is separate from it. So too are the media, the courts, other levels of government, the array of interest groups and social movements, other forums and tribunals and the citizenry. -
Legislative Assembly Hansard 1988
Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly THURSDAY, 14 APRIL 1988 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy Motion of Condolence 14 AprU 1988 5883 THURSDAY, 14 APRIL 1988 Mr SPEAKER (Hon. L.W. PoweU, Isis) read prayers and took the chair at 10 a.m. MOTION OF CONDOLENCE Death of Mr R. L. Windsor Hon. M. J. AHERN (Landsborough—Premier and Treasurer and Minister for the Arts) (10.01 a.m.), by leave, without notice: I move— "I. That this House desires to place on record its appreciation of the services rendered to this State by the late Robert Levi Windsor, a former member of the ParUament of Queensland. 2. That Mr Speaker be requested to convey to the widow and family of the deceased gentleman the above resolution, together with an expression of the sympathy and sorrow of the members of the Parliament of Queensland in the loss they have sustained." Robert Levi Windsor served the people of Queensland as a member of this House for nine years, first as the Liberal member for Fortitude Valley and then, following the abolition of that seat, as the member for Ithaca from 1960 until his retirement in 1966. He entered Parliament after great political excitement and upheaval in Queensland which saw a strong swing from Labor to the conservative style of govemment that we enjoy today. Of his political contemporaries, only the honourable members for Nundah, Sir WiUiam Knox, Yeronga, Norm Lee, and Moggill, Bill Lickiss, remain in Pariiament. They knew Bob Windsor very well. Bob Windsor has left behind him a reputation for honesty and concern for his fellow Queenslanders that marked his entire career. -
Legislative Assembly Hansard 1965
Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly TUESDAY, 26 OCTOBER 1965 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy Questions [26 OCTOBER] Questions 1075 TUESDAY, 26 OCTOBER, 1965 (2) If so, how many such operators were (a) owner-drivers and (b) employee drivers? Mr. SPEAKER (Hon. D. E. Nicholson, Murrumba) read prayers and took the chair (3) What was the maximum term of at 11 a.m. imprisonment imposed? ADDRESS IN REPLY Answers:- HER MAJESTY's ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF (1 and 2) "Upon conviction by a Court AssURANCES OF LOYALTY. for a breach of "The State Transport Mr. SPEAKER: I have to inform the Facilities Acts, 1946 to 1959," or "The House that I have received the following State Transport Act of 1960," the pro letter from the Deputy Governor cedure for recovery of the amounts imposed by way of penalty, or in the "Government House, event of non-payment, for the issue of a "Brisbane, October 25, 1965. warrant for the imprisonment of the _"Sir, . offender if default imprisonment has been "I have the honour to mform you that ordered by the Court is one for the Clerk the Message of Loyalty from the Legis of the Court where the case was heard, lative Assembly of Queensland, dated as provided by the Justices Acts. I am September 7, 1965, has been laid before aware of only two transport operators The Queen. having been jailed for offences under the "I have it in command from The Queen above Acts in the last twelve ( 12) months. to convey to the Members of the Legis Both these operators were owner drivers. -
The Democratic Labour Party (DLP) and Bob Santamaria the Democratic Labour Party (DLP) and Bob Santamaria
1 The Democratic Labour Party (DLP) and Bob Santamaria The Democratic Labour Party (DLP) and Bob Santamaria A talk given by Joe Sampson to The Atheist Society at the Melbourne Unitarian Church on 8 July 2014 Introduction This talk is on two related topics; the Democratic Labour Party (DLP) and the late Bob Santamaria. Although Bob Santamaria was never a member of the DLP he had a lot of influence on it via his organisations, the Movement and later the NCC (National Civic Council). Autobiographical Note I begin my talk on an autobiographical note. I distinctly remember, in 1954, as an eight year old, my father, who was an ALP supporter, saying “Evatt’s gone mad”, after Dr. Evatt, the leader of the ALP Federal Opposition, attacked Bob Santamaria’s Catholic Social Studies Movement (or ‘The Movement’, as it was called) and the related Industrial Groups for what HE called their disloyal influence on the ALP. Shortly after Evatt’s speech members of Industrial Groups left or were expelled from the ALP and formed the DLP; this breakup of the ALP is referred to as The Split. My father and mother were keen supporters of the DLP. My father subscribed to the News Weekly, the journal of the Movement (and later of its successor National Civic Council (NCC)). My father once stood as a DLP candidate in an election. I read News Weekly pretty well continually from 1954 to 1970. I myself, from 1955, became a keen supporter of the DLP. My father used to get me and my brothers to letterbox DLP pamphlets and hand out DLP how-to-vote cards at polling booths at election time.