Baltimore Bicycle Infrastructure and Study Site
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
FINAL REPORT Bicycle Justice or Just Bicycles? Analyzing Equity in Baltimore’s Bike Share Program August 2018 Celeste Chavis, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Morgan State University Philip Barnes, Ph.D., Associate Policy Scientist, Institute for Public Administration (IPA), University of Delaware Susan Grasso, Doctoral Candidate and Public Administration Fellow, University of Delaware Istiak A. Bhuyan, Graduate Student, Morgan State University Amirreza Nickkar, Graduate Student, Morgan State University Prepared by: Department of Transportation and Urban Infrastructure Studies Morgan State University 1700 E. Cold Springs Lane Baltimore, MD 21251 Prepared for: Virginia Center for Transportation Innovation and Research 530 Edgemont Road Charlottesville, VA 22903 1 Acknowledgements The research team would like to thank the City of Baltimore Department of Transportation, Bewegen Technologies, Equitable Cities LLC, and the Southeast Community Development Corporation for their active participation in this research effort. The team would also like to thank the patient users of Baltimore Bike Share and those individuals who took the time to respond to the survey solicitations and attend the focus groups. Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. 2 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. 1. Report No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Bicycle Justice or Just Bicycles? Analyzing Equity in Baltimore’s September 2018 Bike Share Program 6. Performing Organization Code 8. Performing Organization Report No. 7. Author(s) Celeste Chavis, Philip Barnes, Susan Grasso, Istiak A. Bhuyan, Amirreza Nickkar 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS Department of Transportation and Urban Infrastructure Studies 11. Contract or Grant No. Morgan State University DTRT13-G-UTC33 1700 E. Cold Springs Lane Baltimore, MD 21251 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address US Department of Transportation Final Report 6/1/17 – 9/30/18 Office of the Secretary-Research UTC Program, RDT-30 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract Bike share systems have become a common feature of the modern urban landscape and provide residents and visitors with an active transportation mode. Yet these systems have sustained equity-focused criticism for serving a narrow demographic band of residents and visitors, while others lack access and face barriers to usage. The City of Baltimore, Maryland, launched a bike share system in 2016. This study evaluates Baltimore’s new system from an equity-focused lens using two complementary approaches. The first approach, which is a GIS-based equity gap analysis, develops a population-density-normalized Bike Equity Index to quantitatively assess the spatial distribution of the city’s bicycle infrastructure supply and how it serves (or doesn’t serve) Baltimore’s transit-dependent and environmental justice communities. The second analytic orientation, which applies a user and barrier analysis, utilizes survey data to identify the low-equity groups and the variables that limit (or don’t limit) their demand for the city’s bike share program. When combined, the two perspectives—one top-down and the other bottom-up—present a more comprehensive picture and nuanced understanding of the current system’s equity performance. The research findings demonstrate that Baltimore Bike Share infrastructure is unevenly distributed across the city’s many communities and is undersupplied in areas with residents who are transit-dependent. Furthermore, the results support claims of a demographic mismatch between current bike share system users and the general population. The communities underrepresented among Baltimore Bike Share users are less educated, lower-income, non- whites, Hispanics, and females. The research indicates that females express concern over certain barriers to 3 accessing and using Baltimore Bike Share, including how to use the system, personal safety, helmet use, harassment, and hygiene. No significant barriers were identified for the other underrepresented demographic groups. To enhance the equity of the system, the research team recommends that the City of Baltimore prioritize bike share system expansion into the neighborhoods east and west of the downtown corridor. A robust community outreach strategy that targets underrepresented populations is also recommended and should include initiatives such as a grassroots bike share ambassador program and organized community rides. The bike share docking stations can also be leveraged for their advertising potential and should contain marketing materials that speak directly to underrepresented communities. 18. Distribution Statement 17. Key Words Baltimore, bike share, equity, urban mobility, gap analysis, bike No restrictions. This document is available equity index, equity analysis, survey research, policy analysis from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 20. Security Classif. (of this 21. No. of Pages 22. Price 19. Security Classif. (of this page) report) 130 Unclassified Unclassified 4 Table of Contents Preface ............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 10 2. The Baltimore Bike Share Program ......................................................................................................... 11 2.1 History of Baltimore Bike Share Program .................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 Phase 1A ............................................................................................................................................ 12 2.1.2 Phase 1B ............................................................................................................................................ 13 2.1.3 Toward Dockless Bike Share ..................................................................................................... 14 3. Literature Review ........................................................................................................................................... 15 3.1 Equity in Transportation ..................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Bicycling, Barriers, and Equity Communities .............................................................................. 16 3.2.1 Barriers to Biking in Equity Communities ........................................................................... 16 3.2.2 Barriers to Bike Share in Equity Communities .................................................................. 18 4. Supply of Bike Share Infrastructure: Equity Gap Analysis ............................................................. 21 4.1 Scope of Analysis and Study Area .................................................................................................... 21 4.2 Data Sources ............................................................................................................................................. 22 4.3 Bike Equity Index Development ....................................................................................................... 22 4.4 Results and Discussion ......................................................................................................................... 26 5. Demand for Bike Share: User and Barrier Analyses ......................................................................... 30 5.1 Data Collection......................................................................................................................................... 30 5.1.1 User Data Collection ..................................................................................................................... 30 5.1.2 Non-User Data Collection ........................................................................................................... 31 5.2 Analytic Approach .................................................................................................................................. 32 5.3 User Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 33 5.4 Barrier Analysis ...................................................................................................................................... 34 5.4.1 Intercept Survey Descriptive Statistics ................................................................................. 34 5.4.2 Regression Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 36 5.5 Discussion ................................................................................................................................................. 43 6. Equity Best Practices ...................................................................................................................................