Organelle Genomes of Lichens
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Heathland Wind Farm Technical Appendix A8.1: Habitat Surveys
HEATHLAND WIND FARM TECHNICAL APPENDIX A8.1: HABITAT SURVEYS JANAURY 2021 Prepared By: Harding Ecology on behalf of: Arcus Consultancy Services 7th Floor 144 West George Street Glasgow G2 2HG T +44 (0)141 221 9997 l E [email protected] w www.arcusconsulting.co.uk Registered in England & Wales No. 5644976 Habitat Survey Report Heathland Wind Farm TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................. 1 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Background .................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Site Description .............................................................................................. 2 2 METHODS .................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Desk Study...................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Field Survey .................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Survey Limitations .......................................................................................... 5 3 RESULTS .................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Desk Study..................................................................................................... -
Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska
The Lichenologist (2020), 52,61–181 doi:10.1017/S0024282920000079 Standard Paper Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska Toby Spribille1,2,3 , Alan M. Fryday4 , Sergio Pérez-Ortega5 , Måns Svensson6, Tor Tønsberg7, Stefan Ekman6 , Håkon Holien8,9, Philipp Resl10 , Kevin Schneider11, Edith Stabentheiner2, Holger Thüs12,13 , Jan Vondrák14,15 and Lewis Sharman16 1Department of Biological Sciences, CW405, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada; 2Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria; 3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA; 4Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; 5Real Jardín Botánico (CSIC), Departamento de Micología, Calle Claudio Moyano 1, E-28014 Madrid, Spain; 6Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden; 7Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen Allégt. 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway; 8Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, Nord University, Box 2501, NO-7729 Steinkjer, Norway; 9NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; 10Faculty of Biology, Department I, Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; 11Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; 12Botany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany; 13Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 14Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic; 15Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and 16Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve, P.O. -
Lichens and Allied Fungi of the Indiana Forest Alliance
2017. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 126(2):129–152 LICHENS AND ALLIED FUNGI OF THE INDIANA FOREST ALLIANCE ECOBLITZ AREA, BROWN AND MONROE COUNTIES, INDIANA INCORPORATED INTO A REVISED CHECKLIST FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA James C. Lendemer: Institute of Systematic Botany, The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY 10458-5126 USA ABSTRACT. Based upon voucher collections, 108 lichen species are reported from the Indiana Forest Alliance Ecoblitz area, a 900 acre unit in Morgan-Monroe and Yellowwood State Forests, Brown and Monroe Counties, Indiana. The lichen biota of the study area was characterized as: i) dominated by species with green coccoid photobionts (80% of taxa); ii) comprised of 49% species that reproduce primarily with lichenized diaspores vs. 44% that reproduce primarily through sexual ascospores; iii) comprised of 65% crustose taxa, 29% foliose taxa, and 6% fruticose taxa; iv) one wherein many species are rare (e.g., 55% of species were collected fewer than three times) and fruticose lichens other than Cladonia were entirely absent; and v) one wherein cyanolichens were poorly represented, comprising only three species. Taxonomic diversity ranged from 21 to 56 species per site, with the lowest diversity sites concentrated in riparian corridors and the highest diversity sites on ridges. Low Gap Nature Preserve, located within the study area, was found to have comparable species richness to areas outside the nature preserve, although many species rare in the study area were found only outside preserve boundaries. Sets of rare species are delimited and discussed, as are observations as to the overall low abundance of lichens on corticolous substrates and the presence of many unhealthy foliose lichens on mature tree boles. -
Piedmont Lichen Inventory
PIEDMONT LICHEN INVENTORY: BUILDING A LICHEN BIODIVERSITY BASELINE FOR THE PIEDMONT ECOREGION OF NORTH CAROLINA, USA By Gary B. Perlmutter B.S. Zoology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 1991 A Thesis Submitted to the Staff of The North Carolina Botanical Garden University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Advisor: Dr. Johnny Randall As Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Certificate in Native Plant Studies 15 May 2009 Perlmutter – Piedmont Lichen Inventory Page 2 This Final Project, whose results are reported herein with sections also published in the scientific literature, is dedicated to Daniel G. Perlmutter, who urged that I return to academia. And to Theresa, Nichole and Dakota, for putting up with my passion in lichenology, which brought them from southern California to the Traingle of North Carolina. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….4 Chapter I: The North Carolina Lichen Checklist…………………………………………………7 Chapter II: Herbarium Surveys and Initiation of a New Lichen Collection in the University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU)………………………………………………………..9 Chapter III: Preparatory Field Surveys I: Battle Park and Rock Cliff Farm……………………13 Chapter IV: Preparatory Field Surveys II: State Park Forays…………………………………..17 Chapter V: Lichen Biota of Mason Farm Biological Reserve………………………………….19 Chapter VI: Additional Piedmont Lichen Surveys: Uwharrie Mountains…………………...…22 Chapter VII: A Revised Lichen Inventory of North Carolina Piedmont …..…………………...23 Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………..72 Appendices………………………………………………………………………………….…..73 Perlmutter – Piedmont Lichen Inventory Page 4 INTRODUCTION Lichens are composite organisms, consisting of a fungus (the mycobiont) and a photosynthesising alga and/or cyanobacterium (the photobiont), which together make a life form that is distinct from either partner in isolation (Brodo et al. -
Air Quality Monitoring Alaska Region
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Air Quality Monitoring Alaska Region Ri O-TB-46 on theTongass National September, 1994 Forest Methods and Baselines Using Lichens September 1994 Linda H. Geiser, Chiska C. Derr, and Karen L. Diliman USDA-Forest Service Tongass National Forest/ Stikine Area P.O. Box 309 Petersburg, Alaska 99833 ,, ) / / 'C ,t- F C Air Quality Monitoringon the Tongass National Forest Methods and Baselines Using Lichens Linda H. Geiser, Chiska C. Derr and Karen L. Diliman USDA-Forest Service Tongass National Forest/ Stikine Area P.O. Box 309 Petersburg, Alaska 99833 September, 1994 1 AcknowJedgment Project development and funding: Max Copenhagen, Regional Hydrologist, Jim McKibben Stikine Area FWWSA Staff Officer and Everett Kissinger, Stikine Area Soil Scientist, and program staff officers from the other Areas recognized the need for baseline air quality information on the Tongass National Forest and made possible the initiation of this project in 1989. Their continued management level support has been essential to the development of this monitoring program. Lichen collections and field work: Field work was largely completed by the authors. Mary Muller contributed many lichens to the inventory collected in her capacity as Regional Botanist during the past 10 years. Field work was aided by Sarah Ryll of the Stikine Area, Elizabeth Wilder and Walt Tulecke of Antioch College, and Bill Pawuk, Stikine Area ecologist. Lichen identifications: Help with the lichen identifications was given by Irwin Brodo of the Canadian National Museum, John Thomson of the University of Wisconsin at Madison, Pak Yau Wong of the Canadian National Museum, and Bruce McCune at Oregon State University. -
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List - Kenai - U.S
Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List - Kenai - U.S. Fish and Wild... http://www.fws.gov/refuge/Kenai/wildlife_and_habitat/species_list.html Kenai National Wildlife Refuge | Alaska Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List Below is a checklist of the species recorded on the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge. The list of 1865 species includes 34 mammals, 154 birds, one amphibian, 20 fish, 611 arthropods, 7 molluscs, 11 other animals, 493 vascular plants, 180 bryophytes, 29 fungi, and 325 lichens. Of the total number of species, 1771 are native, 89 are non-native, and five include both native and non-native subspecies. Non-native species are indicated by dagger symbols (†) and species having both native and non-native subspecies are indicated by double dagger symbols (‡). Fifteen species no longer occur on the Refuge, indicated by empty set symbols ( ∅). Data were updated on 15 October 2015. See also the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge checklist on iNaturalist.org ( https://www.inaturalist.org/check_lists/188476-Kenai-National-Wildlife- Refuge-Check-List ). Mammals ( #1 ) Birds ( #2 ) Amphibians ( #3 ) Fish ( #4 ) Arthropods ( #5 ) Molluscs ( #6 ) Other Animals ( #7 ) Vascular Plants ( #8 ) Other Plants ( #9 ) Fungi ( #10 ) Lichens ( #11 ) Change Log ( #changelog ) Mammals () Phylum Chordata Class Mammalia Order Artiodactyla Family Bovidae 1. Oreamnos americanus (Blainville, 1816) (Mountain goat) 2. Ovis dalli Nelson, 1884 (Dall's sheep) Family Cervidae 3. Alces alces (Linnaeus, 1758) (Moose) 4. Rangifer tarandus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Caribou) Order Carnivora Family Canidae 5. Canis latrans Say, 1823 (Coyote) 6. Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758 (Gray wolf) 7. Vulpes vulpes (Linnaeus, 1758) (Red fox) Family Felidae 8. Lynx lynx (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lynx) 9. -
Distinctive Characters of Nostoc Genomes in Cyanolichens Andrey N
Gagunashvili and Andrésson BMC Genomics (2018) 19:434 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4743-5 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Distinctive characters of Nostoc genomes in cyanolichens Andrey N. Gagunashvili* and Ólafur S. Andrésson Abstract Background: Cyanobacteria of the genus Nostoc are capable of forming symbioses with a wide range of organism, including a diverse assemblage of cyanolichens. Only certain lineages of Nostoc appear to be able to form a close, stable symbiosis, raising the question whether symbiotic competence is determined by specific sets of genes and functionalities. Results: We present the complete genome sequencing, annotation and analysis of two lichen Nostoc strains. Comparison with other Nostoc genomes allowed identification of genes potentially involved in symbioses with a broad range of partners including lichen mycobionts. The presence of additional genes necessary for symbiotic competence is likely reflected in larger genome sizes of symbiotic Nostoc strains. Some of the identified genes are presumably involved in the initial recognition and establishment of the symbiotic association, while others may confer advantage to cyanobionts during cohabitation with a mycobiont in the lichen symbiosis. Conclusions: Our study presents the first genome sequencing and genome-scale analysis of lichen-associated Nostoc strains. These data provide insight into the molecular nature of the cyanolichen symbiosis and pinpoint candidate genes for further studies aimed at deciphering the genetic mechanisms behind the symbiotic competence of Nostoc. Since many phylogenetic studies have shown that Nostoc is a polyphyletic group that includes several lineages, this work also provides an improved molecular basis for demarcation of a Nostoc clade with symbiotic competence. -
CR 97-2 Pages
A Floristic Inventory and Spatial 97-23 Database for Fort Wainwright, Interior Alaska Charles Racine, Robert Lichvar, Barbara Murray, October 1997 Gerald Tande, Robert Lipkin, and Michael Duffy SPECIAL REPORT Abstract: An inventory of the vascular and ground-in- Flats and associated wetlands, 4) the upland buttes and habiting cryptogam flora of Fort Wainwright, in interior Blair Lakes area in Tanana Flats, and 5) the floodplains Alaska, was conducted during the summer of 1995 to of the Tanana and Chena Rivers. Over 100 sites were support land management needs related to the impact visited, with habitats ranging from very dry south-facing of training. Primary plant collecting, identification and slopes to forest, floodplains, wetlands, and alpine tun- verification were conducted by the Alaska Natural Heri- dra. tage Program and the University of Alaska Museum. Vascular collections represented 491 species (includ- The work was supervised and the data compiled into a ing subspecies and varieties), included about 26% of geographic information system by the USA Cold Re- Alaska’s vascular flora, and are considered to be rela- gions Research and Engineering Laboratory and the tively complete. The cryptogam collections included 219 USA Waterways Experiment Station. species, representing 92 mosses, 117 lichens, and 10 Fort Wainwright covers 370,450 hectares (915,000 liverworts. The flora is characteristic of the circumpolar acres); it was divided into five areas: 1) the valleys of boreal forest and wetlands of both North America and a cantonment area of base facilities, 2) the slopes and Eurasia, but it also contains alpine and dry-grassland alpine areas of the Yukon–Tanana Uplands, 3) Tanana and steppe species. -
Bulletin of the California Lichen Society
Bulletin of the California Lichen Society Volume 11 No.1 Summer 2004 The California Lichen Society seeks to promote the appreciation, conservation and study of the lichens. The interests of the Society include the entire western part of the continent, although the focus is on California. Dues categories (in $US per year): Student and fi xed income - $10, Regular - $18 ($20 for foreign members), Family - $25, Sponsor and Libraries - $35, Donor - $50, Benefactor - $100 and Life Membership - $500 (one time) payable to the California Lichen Society, P.O. Box 472, Fairfax, CA 94930. Members receive the Bulletin and notices of meetings, fi eld trips, lectures and workshops. Board Members of the California Lichen Society: President: Bill Hill, P.O. Box 472, Fairfax, CA 94930, email: <[email protected]> Vice President: Boyd Poulsen Secretary: Sara Blauman Treasurer: Kathy Faircloth Editor: Tom Carlberg Committees of the California Lichen Society: Data Base: Charis Bratt, chairperson Conservation: Eric Peterson, chairperson Education/Outreach: Lori Hubbart, chairperson Poster/Mini Guides: Janet Doell, chairperson The Bulletin of the California Lichen Society (ISSN 1093-9148) is edited by Tom Carlberg, <[email protected]>. The Bulletin has a review committee including Larry St. Clair, Shirley Tucker, William Sanders and Richard Moe, and is produced by Richard Doell. The Bulletin welcomes manuscripts on technical topics in lichenology relating to western North America and on conservation of the lichens, as well as news of lichenologists and their ac- tivities. The best way to submit manuscripts is by e-mail attachments or on 1.44 Mb diskette or a CD in Word Perfect or Microsoft Word formats. -
Opuscula Philolichenum, 7: 121-186. 2009. Lichenicolous Fungi and Lichens from the Holarctic
Opuscula Philolichenum, 7: 121-186. 2009. Lichenicolous fungi and lichens from the Holarctic. Part II. 1 MIKHAIL P. ZHURBENKO ABSTRACT. – A total of 141 species of lichenicolous fungi, 12 lichenicolous lichens, and 94 biogeograph- ically interesting non-lichenicolous lichens, mainly from the Russian Arctic, are reported and many are discussed. Corticifraga fusispora sp. nov. (on Peltigera), Odontotrema japewiae sp. nov. (on Japewia), and Opegrapha pulv- inata var. placidiicola var. nov. (on Placidium) are described from Russia. Dactylospora rinodinicola is reduced to synonymy with D. deminuta. New to North America: Didymellopsis latitans, Epilichen glauconigellus, Polycoccum bryonthae, Psora elenkinii, Stigmidium solorinarium, and Unguiculariopsis refractiva. New to Asia and Russia: Adelococcus alpestris, Arrhenia peltigerina, Arthrorhaphis olivacea, Buellia lecanoricola, Epibryon solorinae, Hobsoniopsis santessonii, Lecidea polytrichinella, Lichenochora coppinsii, L. elegantis, Muellerella atricola, Odontotrema cuculare, Opegrapha geographicola, Phaeoseptoria peltigerae, Phoma denigricans, P. physciicola, Polydesmia lichenis, Pronectria walkerorum, Rhagadostoma brevisporum, Roselliniella pannariae, Sclerococcum montagnei, Scutula dedicata, Tremella christiansenii, Trichosphaeria lichenum, Unguiculariopsis thallophila, Weddellomyces protearius, Zwackhiomyces immersae, and Z. physciicola. New to Asia, but not Russia: Capronia peltigerae, Dacampia rufescentis, Lasiosphaeriopsis salisburyi, Lichenochora weillii, Pronectria minuta, P. tibellii, -
Peltigera Pacifica Species Fact Sheet
SPECIES FACT SHEET Common Name: fringed pelt, Pacific felt lichen, frog pelt Scientific Name: Peltigera pacifica Division: Ascomycota Class: Ascomycetes Order: Peltigerales Family: Peltigeraceae Technical Description: Thallus foliose, with distinct upper surface (cortex). Photosynthetic partner (photobiont) the cyanobacterium Nostoc. Thallus up to 10 cm diameter; lobes 0.5 – 1 cm wide with ruffled-looking, mostly upturned margins that are often densely covered with abundant lobules; lobes relatively thin compared to other Peltigera species. Upper cortex slightly undulating, smooth, shiny, light bluish grey, sometimes with a brownish tint. Lower side without a cortex, white, with 0.8 – 1.5 mm broad low veins which are pale brown near the margins and darkening in the center. Spaces between the veins remain white. Rhizines slender, 2 – 4 mm long, single or occasionally branching, without tufting or tomentum. Lobules marginal and laminal, sometimes isidioid. Each lobule narrows where attached to the thallus, making it easily separated for dispersal. Lobules often somewhat dissected, giving the thallus a frilled appearance. Apothecia form on the upper side of narrow lobes and become revolute and vertical. Chemistry: All spot tests negative. Contains tenuiorin, methyl gyrophorate, zeorin, peltidactylin and dolichorrhizin. Distinctive characters: (1) The generally abundant marginal lobules, (2) narrow lobes and (3) glabrous, often shiny upper surface. It frequently has a disheveled appearance, with a partially discolored upper surface and margins partially consumed by herbivores (McCune and Geiser 1997). Similar species: Peltigera elisabethae has a smooth upper surface and lobules but (1) the veins are wide and indistinct, and (2) the outer rhizines are in concentric rows. Peltigera praetextata has marginal lobules but (1) has a tomentose upper surface, at least at lobe tips, and (2) rhizines often have minute erect tomentum. -
Juriado Et Al. 2018
Relationships between mycobiont identity, photobiont specificity and ecological preferences in the lichen genus Peltigera (Ascomycota) in Estonia (northeastern Europe) Inga Juriadoa, ∗, Ulla Kaasalainenb, Maarit Jylhac, Jouko Rikkinenb, c a Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 38/40, Tartu, 51005, Estonia b Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 7, 00014, Helsinki, Finland c Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, 00014, Helsinki, Finland A B S T R A C T We studied the genotype diversity of cyanobacterial symbionts in the predominately terricolous cyanolichen genus Peltigera (Peltigerales, Lecanoromycetes) in Estonia. Our sampling comprised 252 lichen specimens collected in grasslands and forests from different parts of the country, which represented all common Peltigera taxa in the region. The cyanobacteria were grouped according to their tRNALeu (UAA) intron sequences, and mycobiont identities were confirmed using fungal ITS sequences. The studied Peltigera species associated with 34 different “Peltigera-type” Nostoc trnL genotypes. Some Peltigera species associated with one or a few trnL genotypes while others associated with a much wider range of genotypes. Mycobiont identity was the primary factor that determined the presence of the specific Nostoc genotype within the studied Peltigera thalli. However, the species-specific patterns of cyanobiont selectivity did not always reflect phylogenetic relationships among the studied fungal species but correlated instead with habitat preferences. Several taxa from different sections of the genus Peltigera were associated with the same Nostoc genotype or with genotypes in the same habitat, indicating the presence of functional guild structure in the photobiont community.