DOCSLIB.ORG

Heathland Wind Farm Technical Appendix A8.1: Habitat Surveys

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HEATHLAND WIND FARM TECHNICAL APPENDIX A8.1: HABITAT SURVEYS JANAURY 2021 Prepared By: Harding Ecology on behalf of: Arcus Consultancy Services 7th Floor 144 West George Street Glasgow G2 2HG T +44 (0)141 221 9997 l E [email protected] w www.arcusconsulting.co.uk Registered in England & Wales No. 5644976 Habitat Survey Report Heathland Wind Farm TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................. 1 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Background .................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Site Description .............................................................................................. 2 2 METHODS .................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Desk Study...................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Field Survey .................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Survey Limitations .......................................................................................... 5 3 RESULTS .................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Desk Study...................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Field Survey .................................................................................................. 10 4 SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS ................................................................................. 32 5 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... 34 APPENDIX 1 - FIGURES ...................................................................................................... 36 APPENDIX 2 – HABITAT POLYGON DATA .......................................................................... 37 APPENDIX 3 – TARGET NOTES ........................................................................................... 76 APPENDIX 4 – PLANT SPECIES LISTS ................................................................................ 78 EDF Renewables Arcus Consultancy Services January 2021 Page i Habitat Survey Report Heathland Wind Farm ABBREVIATIONS ASL: Above sea level BSBI: Botanical Society of the British Isles LBAP: Local Biodiversity Action Plan NBN: National Biodiversity Network NVC: National Vegetation Classification RPR: Rare Plant Register SAC: Special Area of Conservation SBL: Scottish Biodiversity List SSSI: Site of Special Scientific Interest EDF Renewables Arcus Consultancy Services January 2021 Page 1 Habitat Survey Report Heathland Wind Farm 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background Arcus Consultancy Services Ltd (Arcus) was commissioned by EDF Renewables to complete a habitat survey of the proposed Heathland Wind Farm (hereafter referred to as ‘the Development’). The Site (as defined by the red-line boundary in Figure 8.1.1) is located approximately 1.5 km northeast of Forth in South Lanarkshire (with the north end of the Site crossing into West Lothian); the central grid reference of the Site is NS9651656987. Alongside the Site, an additional area of land was also surveyed, referred to as the ‘Additional Survey Area (ASA)’ throughout this report. The ASA is also shown on Figure 8.1.1.The ASA was subsequently removed from consideration for Development infrastructure during the design process for the Development. The habitat survey was carried out by Matt Harding (MCIEEM) of Harding Ecology, a professional ecological surveyor with relevant skills and experience. It was completed in August and September 2019, with an additional follow-up visit made in May 2020. The habitat survey consisted of a combined Phase 1 habitat survey (JNCC, 2010) and National Vegetation Classification (NVC) survey (Rodwell, 1996), with an assessment of habitat groundwater dependency and suitability assessment for protected mammal species also undertaken. This report details the survey methods followed and the survey results. 1.2 Site Description The Site rises from 280 m above sea level (asl) in the southwest, just north of the village of Wilsontown, to 362 m asl in the northeast on the hill of Hendry’s Corse. A second hill, Worm Law (343m asl), is present in the south of the Site. The A704 runs along its western boundary, and Tormywheel Wind Farm is present to the northwest. The Heathland area is primarily drained by Mouse Water, which flows southwest from Hendry’s Corse to Wilsontown. In the east of the area, Wormlaw Burn drains southeast to join Mosshat Burn. The Site is largely comprised of coniferous plantation forestry, or clearfelled areas, which is connected to forestry to the north and west. A network of plantation rides, burn valleys and track verges provides habitat variety, with wet modified bog, damp neutral grassland, marsh/marshy grassland and acid/neutral flush the most frequently encountered habitat types. The ASA covers the open ground to the east of the Site, running from Pateshill Wind Farm in the north to the plantation above Wester Mosshat in the south. The area consists of a broad ridge of ground, running approximately northeast to southwest, and reaching 314 m asl. It is drained to the south by Mosshat Burn, and to the north by Harwood Water. Where the ground descends to the southeast, several minor burns drain the slope towards the ASA. The ASA consists of a mixture of open ground habitats, with wet modified bog, blanket bog, rush-pasture, acid/neutral flush, acid grassland and neutral grassland the most widespread. Four isolated plantation blocks are also present within the area. A 200 m buffer of the Site and the ASA was also surveyed. This consisted of similar habitats to those found on the site, namely coniferous plantation, wet modified bog and blanket bog, marsh/marshy grassland, acid/neutral flush, acid grassland and neutral grassland. The Site buffer included sections of Tormywheel and Pateshill Wind Farms, upland grazing pasture associated with Mountainblaw Farm and Upper Haywood, and an area of historic mining bings just north of Wilsontown. Arcus Consultancy Services EDF Renewables Page 2 January 2021 Habitat Survey Report Heathland Wind Farm 2 METHODS 2.1 Desk Study 2.1.1 Designated sites An online search was made for designated sites within 5km1 of the Site boundary, using the NatureScot Sitelink tool (https://sitelink.nature.scot/map) and the MAGIC Map tool (https://magic.defra.gov.uk/). This report focuses on sites designated for habitat or flora interests, rather than for bird or mammal interests. The potential geographical and/or ecological connectivity of any designated sites with the Site was assessed. 2.1.2 Vascular plant species of conservation concern An online search was made for vascular plant species of conservation concern within 51km of the Site boundary, using the following resources: Botanical Society of the British Isles (BSBI) database (https://database.bsbi.org/), accessed 12th February 2020. Species were searched for within the NS95 and NT05 hectads, within which the Site is located; and National Biodiversity Network (NBN) Gateway (https://nbnatlas.org/), accessed 12th February 2020. Species were searched for within 5km of the Site boundary. Plant species of conservation concern were defined as: Species on the Vascular Plant Red Data List for Great Britain, as updated (Leach, 2019; available at https://bsbi.org/taxon-lists); Species of principal importance for conservation on the Scottish Biodiversity List (https://www.nature.scot/scotlands-biodiversity/scottish-biodiversity- strategy/scottish-biodiversity-list); Species assessed as Nationally Rare or Nationally Scarce, based on their distribution across the UK (available at https://bsbi.org/taxon-lists); and Species assessed as Locally Rare or Locally Scarce, based on the Rare Plant Registers (RPR) for Watsonian vice-counties. The Site is covered by the Midlothian RPR (Sumner, 2014), and the Lanarkshire RPR (currently unpublished data only). When assessing local rarity, pre-1970 records were discounted, in line with the RPR approach typically followed. 2.2 Field Survey 2.2.1 Phase 1/NVC survey Habitat surveys were carried out during suitable weather conditions, and during a suitable survey period of late summer for grasslands and heathlands (JNCC, 2010). The Site plus a 200m buffer were covered by the survey in order to map any sensitive habitats that could be located within 250 m of the Development infrastructure, as recommended by SEPA guidance2. Habitats present were classified to community and, where feasible, sub-community using the NVC classification system developed by Rodwell et al. (1991a, et seq.). Where a habitat was not classifiable under the NVC system, it was either classified using the Joint Nature 1 Distance based on the likely Zone of Influence of the species and habitats present or likely to be present. 2 SEPA (2017) Guidance Note 31: Guidance on Assessing the Impacts of Development Proposals on Groundwater Abstractions and Groundwater Dependent Terrestrial Ecosystems. EDF Renewables Arcus Consultancy Services January 2021 Page 3 Habitat Survey Report Heathland Wind Farm Conservation Committee (JNCC) Phase 1 Habitat classification (JNCC, 2010), or assigned a new
Recommended publications
  • The Newfoundland Rare Plant Project Including an Update to the Rare Vascular Plants of the Island of Newfoundland

    The Newfoundland Rare Plant Project Including an Update to the Rare Vascular Plants of the Island of Newfoundland

    The Newfoundland Rare Plant Project Including an Update to the Rare Vascular Plants of the Island of Newfoundland April 2004 prepared by: Nathalie Djan-Chékar, Project Manager Newfoundland and Labrador Inland Fish and Wildlife Division and Claudia Hanel, Assistant Botanist Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre ii Table of Contents Table of Contents..........................................................................................................................ii Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................iii Participants....................................................................................................................................4 Background...................................................................................................................................1 Project description ........................................................................................................................1 Methodology.................................................................................................................................2 Results...........................................................................................................................................3 Revised list of rare vascular plants of the Island of Newfoundland .............................................4 Additions to the list of rare vascular plants of the Island of Newfoundland ............................4 Deletions
  • Bryo's to Know Table

    Bryo's to Know Table

    BRYOS TO KNOW Common Name Claim to Fame MOSSES: Bryopsida: Buckiella undulata Snake Moss, Wavy-Leaf aka Plagiothecium undulatum Moss, Tongue-Moss, Wavy Cotton, Moss Claopodium crispifolium Rough moss Dicranum scoparium Broom Moss Dicranum tauricum Finger-licking-good-moss Eurhynchium oreganum Oregon Beaked-Moss aka Kindbergia oregana Eurhynchium praelongum Slender-Beaked Moss aka Kindbergia praelonga Hylocomium splendens Step Moss, Stair-Step Moss, Splendid Feather Moss Grimmia pulvinata Grey-cushioned Grimmia Hypnum circinale Coiled-Leaf Moss Leucolepis acanthoneuron Menzie’s Tree Moss, Umbrella Moss, Palm-Tree Moss Plagiomnium insigne Badge Moss, Coastal Leafy Moss Pseudotaxiphyllum elegans Small-Flat Moss Rhizomnium glabrescens Fan Moss Rhytidiadelphus loreus Lanky Moss, Loreus Goose Neck Moss Rhytidiadelphus squarrosum Springy Turf-Moss, Square Goose Neck Moss Rhytidiadelphus triquetrus Electrified Cat-Tail Moss, Goose Necked Moss Rhytidiopsus robusta Robust mountain moss Schistostega pennata Goblin’s Gold, Luminous Moss Polytrichopsida: Atrichum Atrichum Moss , Crane’s Bill Moss (for Atrichum selwynii) Pogonatum contortum Contorted Pogonatum Moss Polytrichum commune Common Hair Cap Moss Polytrichum piliferum Bristly Haircap Moss Andreaeopsida Andreaea nivalis Granite moss, Lantern moss, Snow Rock Moss Sphagnopsida: Sphagnum capillifolium Red Bog Moss, Small Red Peat Moss Sphagnum papillosum Fat Bog Moss, Papillose sphagnum Sphagnum squarrosum Shaggy Sphagnum, Spread- Leaved Peat Moss Takakiopsida: Takakia lepidoziooides Impossible
  • Opuscula Philolichenum, 11: 141–144

    Opuscula Philolichenum, 11: 141–144

    Opuscula Philolichenum, 11: 141–144. 2012. *pdf effectively published online 21September2012 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) Puttea (Pilocarpaceae) in eastern North America 1 2 WILLIAM R. BUCK AND JAMES C. LENDEMER ABSTRACT. – Puttea margaritella is reported new to eastern North America from a single collection from the Gaspé Peninsula of Québec, Canada and P. exsequens is reported as new to North America from a single collection from New Brunswick, Canada. INTRODUCTION Puttea S. Stenroos & Huhtinen was described a few years ago (Stenroos et al. 2009) to accommodate a single species of hepaticolous lichen, Lecidea margaritella Hulting. The marginally lichenized fungus was reported to be restricted to growing on the hepatic Ptilidium pulcherrimum (Weber) Hampe. However, when the species was reported from western North America (Spribille et al. 2010) it was reported to also grow on Ptilidium californicum (Austin) Underw. Stenroos et al. (2009) speculated that Puttea is either a necrotrophic parasite or colonizes already dead, decaying shoots of the hepatic. Indeed, the material found by us in eastern Canada is growing over the dead and decaying portions of the Ptilidium pulcherrimum, not on the living, reddish plants. The apothecia are white and one might be misled in thinking they are conspicuous, but the largest ones are only 0.4 mm in diameter and therefore the species is essentially invisible without magnification. The scanty thallus is not visible in the field (and scarcely so under the dissecting microscope). Until recently it was known only from boreal areas of Europe, specifically Fennoscandia (including adjacent Karelia) and woodland areas of central Europe.
  • Flora of New Zealand Mosses

    Flora of New Zealand Mosses

    FLORA OF NEW ZEALAND MOSSES BRACHYTHECIACEAE A.J. FIFE Fascicle 46 – JUNE 2020 © Landcare Research New Zealand Limited 2020. Unless indicated otherwise for specific items, this copyright work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence Attribution if redistributing to the public without adaptation: "Source: Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research" Attribution if making an adaptation or derivative work: "Sourced from Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research" See Image Information for copyright and licence details for images. CATALOGUING IN PUBLICATION Fife, Allan J. (Allan James), 1951- Flora of New Zealand : mosses. Fascicle 46, Brachytheciaceae / Allan J. Fife. -- Lincoln, N.Z. : Manaaki Whenua Press, 2020. 1 online resource ISBN 978-0-947525-65-1 (pdf) ISBN 978-0-478-34747-0 (set) 1. Mosses -- New Zealand -- Identification. I. Title. II. Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd. UDC 582.345.16(931) DC 588.20993 DOI: 10.7931/w15y-gz43 This work should be cited as: Fife, A.J. 2020: Brachytheciaceae. In: Smissen, R.; Wilton, A.D. Flora of New Zealand – Mosses. Fascicle 46. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln. http://dx.doi.org/10.7931/w15y-gz43 Date submitted: 9 May 2019 ; Date accepted: 15 Aug 2019 Cover image: Eurhynchium asperipes, habit with capsule, moist. Drawn by Rebecca Wagstaff from A.J. Fife 6828, CHR 449024. Contents Introduction..............................................................................................................................................1 Typification...............................................................................................................................................1
  • Appendix 2: Plant Lists

    Appendix 2: Plant Lists

    Appendix 2: Plant Lists Master List and Section Lists Mahlon Dickerson Reservation Botanical Survey and Stewardship Assessment Wild Ridge Plants, LLC 2015 2015 MASTER PLANT LIST MAHLON DICKERSON RESERVATION SCIENTIFIC NAME NATIVENESS S-RANK CC PLANT HABIT # OF SECTIONS Acalypha rhomboidea Native 1 Forb 9 Acer palmatum Invasive 0 Tree 1 Acer pensylvanicum Native 7 Tree 2 Acer platanoides Invasive 0 Tree 4 Acer rubrum Native 3 Tree 27 Acer saccharum Native 5 Tree 24 Achillea millefolium Native 0 Forb 18 Acorus calamus Alien 0 Forb 1 Actaea pachypoda Native 5 Forb 10 Adiantum pedatum Native 7 Fern 7 Ageratina altissima v. altissima Native 3 Forb 23 Agrimonia gryposepala Native 4 Forb 4 Agrostis canina Alien 0 Graminoid 2 Agrostis gigantea Alien 0 Graminoid 8 Agrostis hyemalis Native 2 Graminoid 3 Agrostis perennans Native 5 Graminoid 18 Agrostis stolonifera Invasive 0 Graminoid 3 Ailanthus altissima Invasive 0 Tree 8 Ajuga reptans Invasive 0 Forb 3 Alisma subcordatum Native 3 Forb 3 Alliaria petiolata Invasive 0 Forb 17 Allium tricoccum Native 8 Forb 3 Allium vineale Alien 0 Forb 2 Alnus incana ssp rugosa Native 6 Shrub 5 Alnus serrulata Native 4 Shrub 3 Ambrosia artemisiifolia Native 0 Forb 14 Amelanchier arborea Native 7 Tree 26 Amphicarpaea bracteata Native 4 Vine, herbaceous 18 2015 MASTER PLANT LIST MAHLON DICKERSON RESERVATION SCIENTIFIC NAME NATIVENESS S-RANK CC PLANT HABIT # OF SECTIONS Anagallis arvensis Alien 0 Forb 4 Anaphalis margaritacea Native 2 Forb 3 Andropogon gerardii Native 4 Graminoid 1 Andropogon virginicus Native 2 Graminoid 1 Anemone americana Native 9 Forb 6 Anemone quinquefolia Native 7 Forb 13 Anemone virginiana Native 4 Forb 5 Antennaria neglecta Native 2 Forb 2 Antennaria neodioica ssp.
  • Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska

    Lichens and Associated Fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska

    The Lichenologist (2020), 52,61–181 doi:10.1017/S0024282920000079 Standard Paper Lichens and associated fungi from Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska Toby Spribille1,2,3 , Alan M. Fryday4 , Sergio Pérez-Ortega5 , Måns Svensson6, Tor Tønsberg7, Stefan Ekman6 , Håkon Holien8,9, Philipp Resl10 , Kevin Schneider11, Edith Stabentheiner2, Holger Thüs12,13 , Jan Vondrák14,15 and Lewis Sharman16 1Department of Biological Sciences, CW405, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R3, Canada; 2Department of Plant Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Graz, NAWI Graz, Holteigasse 6, 8010 Graz, Austria; 3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, Montana 59812, USA; 4Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; 5Real Jardín Botánico (CSIC), Departamento de Micología, Calle Claudio Moyano 1, E-28014 Madrid, Spain; 6Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden; 7Department of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen Allégt. 41, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway; 8Faculty of Bioscience and Aquaculture, Nord University, Box 2501, NO-7729 Steinkjer, Norway; 9NTNU University Museum, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; 10Faculty of Biology, Department I, Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger Straße 67, 80638 München, Germany; 11Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; 12Botany Department, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany; 13Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 14Institute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic; 15Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and 16Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve, P.O.
  • Vivipary, Proliferation, and Phyllody in Grasses

    Vivipary, Proliferation, and Phyllody in Grasses

    Vivipary, Proliferation, and Phyllody in Grasses A.A. BEETLE Abstract Some temperate grasses have the ability to produce in their tration of the putative flowering hormone is required for inflorescence modified spikelet structures that act to reproduce the flower induction, whereas in the seminiferous races this species vegetatively. These types may be either genetically fixed or difference is not so great. In the viviparous races, the an occasional expression of environmental change. threshold for flower initiation is rarely exceeded so that perfect flowers appear only occasionally, while in the Vivipary sometimes refers to the development of normally seminiferous races, the conditions arise only separable vegetative shoots, as in the case of Poa bulbosa, rarely where an amount of hormone is produced that is wherein florets have been transformed into bulbils. At other sufficient to initiate culms but insufficient to promote times vivipary refers to the germination of an embryo in situ flowering. before the fall of the seed, as in Melocalamus, the fleshy (a) excess water about the roots seeded bamboo from Burma. (b) excess shade Vegetative proliferation refers to the conversion of the (c) high humidity spikelet, above the glumes, into a leafy shoot. These leafy (d) submergence shoots are not usually an effective method of reproduction (e) abrupt changes in moisture, day length, or tempera- in the wild, but are somewhat easier to establish under ture controlled conditions. (f) insufficient vernalization Both vivipary and proliferation may produce (4) True vivipary conspicuously abnormal spikelets which the latin words vivipara and proZifera have been used to describe, usually without any further discrimination than to indicate their Viviparous Races presence.
  • About the Book the Format Acknowledgments

    About the Book the Format Acknowledgments

    About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization.
  • The Flora of Jan Mayen

    The Flora of Jan Mayen

    NORSK POLARINSTITUTT SKRIFTER NR. 130 JOHANNES LID THE FLORA OF JAN MAYEN IlJustrated by DAGNY TANDE LID or1(f t ett} NORSK POLARINSTITUTT OSLO 1964 DET KONGELIGE DEPARTEMENT FOR INDUSTRI OG HÅNDVERK NORSK POLARINSTITUTT Observatoriegt. l, Oslo, Norway Short account of the publications of Norsk Polarinstitutt The two series, Norsk Polarinstitutt - SKRIFTER and Norsk Polarinstitutt - MEDDELELSER, were taken over from the institution Norges Svalbard- og Ishavs­ undersøkelser (NSIU), which was incorporated in Norsk Polarinstitutt when this was founded in 1948. A third series, Norsk Polarinstitutt - ÅRBOK, is published with one volum(� per year. SKRIFTER includes scientific papers, published in English, French or German. MEDDELELSER comprises shortcr papers, often being reprillts from other publi­ cations. They generally have a more popular form and are mostly published in Norwegian. SKRIFTER has previously been published under various tides: Nos. 1-11. Resultater av De norske statsunderstuttede Spitsbergen-ekspe. ditioner. No 12. Skrifter om Svalbard og Nordishavet. Nos. 13-81. Skrifter om Svalbard og Ishavet. 82-89. Norges Svalbard- og Ishavs-undersøkelser. Skrifter. 90- • Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter. In addition a special series is published: NORWEGIAN-BRITISH-SWEDISH ANTARCTIC EXPEDITION, 1949-52. SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. This series will comprise six volumes, four of which are now completed. Hydrographic and topographic surveys make an important part of the work carried out by Norsk Polarinstitutt. A list of the published charts and maps is printed on p. 3 and 4 of this cover. A complete list of publications, charts and maps is obtainable on request. ÅRBØKER Årbok 1960. 1962. Kr.lS.00. Årbok 1961. 1962. Kr. 24.00.
  • Vegetation Monitoring - Southwest Alaska Network 2012 Annual Report

    Vegetation Monitoring - Southwest Alaska Network 2012 Annual Report

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation monitoring - Southwest Alaska Network 2012 Annual Report Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SWAN/NRDS—2013/521 ON THE COVER A white spruce-black spruce (Picea glauca-P. mariana) stand occupies an old burn on the western shore of Two Lakes, Lake Clark National Park and Preserve. Photograph by Amy Miller. Vegetation monitoring - Southwest Alaska Network 2012 Annual Report Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SWAN/NRDS—2013/521 Amy E. Miller and James K. Walton National Park Service Southwest Alaska Network 240 West 5th Avenue Anchorage, AK 99501 August 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado Month Year U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
  • Species List For: Labarque Creek CA 750 Species Jefferson County Date Participants Location 4/19/2006 Nels Holmberg Plant Survey

    Species List For: Labarque Creek CA 750 Species Jefferson County Date Participants Location 4/19/2006 Nels Holmberg Plant Survey

    Species List for: LaBarque Creek CA 750 Species Jefferson County Date Participants Location 4/19/2006 Nels Holmberg Plant Survey 5/15/2006 Nels Holmberg Plant Survey 5/16/2006 Nels Holmberg, George Yatskievych, and Rex Plant Survey Hill 5/22/2006 Nels Holmberg and WGNSS Botany Group Plant Survey 5/6/2006 Nels Holmberg Plant Survey Multiple Visits Nels Holmberg, John Atwood and Others LaBarque Creek Watershed - Bryophytes Bryophte List compiled by Nels Holmberg Multiple Visits Nels Holmberg and Many WGNSS and MONPS LaBarque Creek Watershed - Vascular Plants visits from 2005 to 2016 Vascular Plant List compiled by Nels Holmberg Species Name (Synonym) Common Name Family COFC COFW Acalypha monococca (A. gracilescens var. monococca) one-seeded mercury Euphorbiaceae 3 5 Acalypha rhomboidea rhombic copperleaf Euphorbiaceae 1 3 Acalypha virginica Virginia copperleaf Euphorbiaceae 2 3 Acer negundo var. undetermined box elder Sapindaceae 1 0 Acer rubrum var. undetermined red maple Sapindaceae 5 0 Acer saccharinum silver maple Sapindaceae 2 -3 Acer saccharum var. undetermined sugar maple Sapindaceae 5 3 Achillea millefolium yarrow Asteraceae/Anthemideae 1 3 Actaea pachypoda white baneberry Ranunculaceae 8 5 Adiantum pedatum var. pedatum northern maidenhair fern Pteridaceae Fern/Ally 6 1 Agalinis gattingeri (Gerardia) rough-stemmed gerardia Orobanchaceae 7 5 Agalinis tenuifolia (Gerardia, A. tenuifolia var. common gerardia Orobanchaceae 4 -3 macrophylla) Ageratina altissima var. altissima (Eupatorium rugosum) white snakeroot Asteraceae/Eupatorieae 2 3 Agrimonia parviflora swamp agrimony Rosaceae 5 -1 Agrimonia pubescens downy agrimony Rosaceae 4 5 Agrimonia rostellata woodland agrimony Rosaceae 4 3 Agrostis elliottiana awned bent grass Poaceae/Aveneae 3 5 * Agrostis gigantea redtop Poaceae/Aveneae 0 -3 Agrostis perennans upland bent Poaceae/Aveneae 3 1 Allium canadense var.
  • Colville National Forest Non-Vascular Plant Survey and Reference Collection Interagency Special Status/Sensitive Species Program Final Report, December 3, 2009

    Colville National Forest Non-Vascular Plant Survey and Reference Collection Interagency Special Status/Sensitive Species Program Final Report, December 3, 2009

    Colville National Forest Non-vascular Plant Survey and Reference Collection Interagency Special Status/Sensitive Species Program Final Report, December 3, 2009 Kathy Ahlenslager and Amy Cabral Colville National Forest, 765 S. Main, Colville, WA, 509-684-7178, [email protected]. Introduction Through this project the populations of 12 rare nonvascular taxa were revisited at seven locations on the Colville National Forest. The rarity status for each is displayed on Table 1. These taxa were included on the Interagency Special Status/Sensitive Species Program (ISSSSP) High Priority Special Status and Sensitive Species List, Regional Forester’s Special Status Species List, or a Washington Natural Heritage Program (WNHP) list. Bryophytes were identified by Erica Heinlen and lichens by Dr. Katherine Glew. In 2009 23 collections of lichens were identified to the 18 taxa in Appendix A and were gathered from 15 sites, as displayed on Appendix B. In addition, 132 vouchers of mosses were identified to the 74 taxa in Appendix C and were collected from 37 locations as shown on Appendix D. Table 1. Rankings of Rare Nonvascular Taxa Documented from the Colville National Forest. (Note: FSSO = Forest Service Sensitive in Oregon, FSSW = Forest Service Sensitive in Washington, G = Global Ranking, S = Washington State Ranking.) Taxa Status on Regional Status (WNHP ISSSSP High Forester’s 20091 or Nature Priority Special Status Serve 20092) Special Status Species List and Sensitive (2008) Species List (2007) Liverworts Calypogeia sphagnicola First Priority