DOCSLIB.ORG

The Burroughs B5000 Conference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE BURROUGHS B 5000 CONFERENCE OH 98 Conducted by Bernard A. Galler and Robert F. Rosin on 6 September 1985 in Marina Del Ray Hotel (Marina Del Ray, CA) Sponsored by AFIPS and Burroughs Corporation Charles Babbage Institute The Center for the History of Information Processing University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Copyright 1986 1 Burroughs B 5000 Conference 6 September 1985 Abstract The Burroughs 5000 computer series is discussed by individuals responsible for its development and marketing from 1957 through the 1960s in a conference sponsored by AFIPS and Burroughs Corporation. In the first session the technical aspects of the B 5000 and 5500 are discussed by a group of managers, engineers, and consultants. Topics include: the state of the industry in the late 1950s; the 5000's predecessors, particularly the ElectroData 101 and 201, B 205, and B 220; factors influencing the decision to produce the B 5000; reasons for designing the machine for ALGOL rather than FORTRAN and the effect of this decision on the computer's development and sales. The group reviews the MCP operating system, PERM, Polish notation, descriptors, stacks, the BALGOL compiler, and other innovations of the computer. In the second session, the same group discusses the development of the B 5000 into a product, including the effect of the administrative organization on the project; the relations between hardware and software engineers; the interaction of project personnel and upper-level management, field marketing, and customers; the COBOL processor, the head protract disk system; the operating system; ALGOL; and documentation of the computer. In the third session managers, sales personnel, and customers of the B 5000 discuss Burroughs' product line before the 200 and 5000 series computers; sales training and market reaction to the B 5000; acceptance of B 5000s at Ohio Oil Company and Stanford University; its rejection by the University of Michigan; reasons why the B 5000 was not marketed overseas; and Burroughs' presidents Raymond Eppert and Ray MacDonald. Technical session participants included: Robert S. Barton, Bobby A. Creech, David M. Dahm, Benjamin A. Dent, Bernard A. Galler, John E. S. Hale, Erwin A. Hauck, Paul D. King, Norman Kreuder, William Lonergan, Duncan MacDonald, F. Brad MacKenzie, G. Clark Oliphint, Robert F. Rosin, Lloyd Turner, and Richard Waychoff. Marketing session participants included: Henri Berce, George A. Collins, James Ford, Bernard A. Galler, John E.S. Hale, Joseph T. Hootman, Paul D. King, F. Brad MacKenzie, Ralph W. Pearson, and Robert F. Rosin. 2 BURROUGHS B 5000 CONFERENCE DATE: 6 September 1985 MODERATOR: Bernard A. Galler LOCATION: Marina del Rey Hotel (Marina del Ray, CA) BERNARD A. GALLER: I'm Bernie Galler; I'm representing AFIPS and the Annals of the History of Computing in this discussion. The date is September 6, 1985, and we're meeting in the Marina del Rey Hotel in California. The subject of the discussion for which we brought a number of people together is the Burroughs B 5000 and 5500 systems as projects within Burroughs, as products from Burroughs, as innovations to the computing world. We've brought a group of people together for the morning session to represent the technical aspects of the systems; this afternoon we'll have another discussion with people who represent the marketing aspects, although I'm sure that both groups will cover aspects of each. I'm going to ask the people who are sitting around the table this morning to identify themselves and give some idea of their role at the time and their present affiliations. Let me first introduce Bob Rosin who also represents the Annals of the History of Computing. Bob is with Syntrex, and is one of the editors of the Annals. To my left is Rosamond Dana, who is the managing editor of the Annals and will be helping with the transcription process, and will be in touch with you all later regarding excerpting the discussion for publication in the Annals. We all understand that the actual tape and transcript will be deposited with the Charles Babbage Institute to become part of its archives. Let us now go around the table and introduce ourselves. DUNCAN MACDONALD: I'm Duncan MacDonald. I guess I was director of engineering at the time; so long ago that it's hard to remember some of these things. I hope you today have a better memory than I do. I am with Burroughs from 1951 to 1972; now I'm running my own small company in computer storage equipment called DMI. ERWIN A. HAUCK: My name is Erv Hauck. I was with the Burroughs Corporation from 1956 through 1982. The assignment I had during that period was as a hardware designer on the 5000/5500 systems. I worked principally in the area of I/O and central control. My current job is with a company called Technology Marketing in Irvine, California. 3 BOBBY A. CREECH: I'm Bob Creech. I joined Burroughs on February 6, 1962, as a senior automatic programmer. Automatic ones were the best kind. I worked as a member of the ALGOL compiler team and later worked on the implementation of the disk file MCP. I was with Burroughs as manager of engineering for the Systems Engineering Division on the East Coast. F. BRAD MACKENZIE: I'm Brad MacKenzie. I joined Burroughs in 1959, and I'm still with Burroughs. During the period we're discussing, I was manager of Automatic Programming in Pasadena. I'm presently manager of Product Assurance in the plant in Tredyffrin, Pennsylvania. PAUL D. KING: I'm Paul King. I joined Burroughs in mid-1954, and I left in August 1962. I came back in mid-1965 and then left in the end of 1969. At the time of the subjects we're talking about in this meeting, I was the project manager of the B 5000 in Product Planning. I'm currently with Citicorp in the Corporate Technology Office. WILLIAM R. LONERGAN: I'm Bill Lonergan. I was with Burroughs the first time from mid-1953 until April 1961. At the time of this project, I was the manager of Product Planning for the ElectroData Division of Burroughs and had responsibility for planning and specifying the product line of the division. I'm currently a general partner in a venture capital partnership. RICHARD WAYCHOFF: My name is Richard Waychoff. I joined Burroughs in March 1959 and left in September of 1979. I was an automatic programmer on the ALGOL compiler project, and currently I'm director of technology for RDS Systems, Inc. JOHN HALE: I'm John Hale. I joined Burroughs in October 1956 in the Dallas district. My association with the B 5000 began in January 1962, when I transferred to Pasadena as manager of the COBOL compiler group. I retired from Burroughs in 1981 and am currently a self-employed consultant. LLOYD D. TURNER: My name is Lloyd Turner. I was with Burroughs from June 1959 until May 1981. I started as a 4 sales technical representative in the Dallas district, and when I left I was corporate vice-president of engineering. During the B 5000 project, I was manager of Scientific Systems Development that had responsibility for the ALGOL compiler and other scientific compilers and the disk file MCP. I'm currently president and chief executive officer of Floating Point Systems, Inc., in Portland, Oregon. ROBERT BARTON: I'm Bob Barton. During the period of interest, I was not employed by Burroughs. As I recall, I had a consulting contract with Product Planning in the beginning, and later, I think, with Engineering, although it's beyond that period. I am currently a principal of an organization called Innovations and Inventions. DAVID M. DAHM: I'm Dave Dahm. I worked for Burroughs in the summer of 1959 and the summer of '61. I became a permanent employee in June of 1962 through July of 1965. During that period I was a senior automatic programmer; I was part of the group, and project leader for the disk file MCP. Currently, I'm a Burroughs employee; and I'm director of Programming Research. G. CLARK OLIPHINT: I'm Clark Oliphint. I worked for Burroughs from mid-1959 until 1964. My title during the period we're interested in was manager of Control Systems development. I was responsible for developing the first MCP on the B 5000. I'm currently an independent or multidependent consultant. NORMAN L. KREUDER: I am Norm Kreuder. I came to Burroughs--actually to the ElectroData Corporation--in the spring of 1954; Burroughs bought us in the summer of 1956. I left Burroughs at the end of 1971. At the time in question, first I was engineering section manager, responsible for the hardware design of the 5000 system, and then later became engineering program manager. I currently have a little company in Santa Ana, California, called PC Horizons. BENJAMIN A. DENT: I'm Ben Dent. I joined Burroughs in the summer of 1956 in Paoli, and I'm still employed by Burroughs. In Paoli, we worked on a somewhat similar machine. It was supposed to be a multiprogramming, multiprocessor machine called the D 825. I became quite interested in operating systems, and then I decided to move 5 to California for personal reasons. So I actually joined the B 5000 project after most of the machine was designed, but before the first operating system or the first customer shipment. I have no idea what my title might have been at that time. I'm currently with Burroughs in an organization called Distributed Systems Group as director of engineering. GALLER: Thank you very much.
Recommended publications
  • The PORTHOS Executive System for the IBM 7094

    The PORTHOS Executive System for the IBM 7094

    A § 1 " * '& I m I ^ ;/ 1 ^ # **W : : : The Porthos Executive System for the IBM 7O9I+ User ' s Manual Table of Contents Title Sheet Preface Table of Contents 1. The 709^-1^01 Computer Installation 1.1. Description 1.1.1. General 1.1.2. Organization 1.1.3* Equipment 1.2. Programming Services 1.2.1. System Consulting 1.2.2. System Development 1.2.3- Associated Programmers 1.3« Library Services 1.3* 1' Program Documentation 1.3*2. Subroutines I.3. 3« Reference Publications 1.3.1+. The Mailing List 1.3' 5* Information Bulletins Date 5/1/65 Section Contents Page: 1 Change 2 Porthos Manual Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/porthosexecutivesyOOuniv : s 2. Use of the Computing Facility 2.1. Conditions of Use 2.1.1. Policy for Charging for Computer Use 2.1.2. Refunding of IBM 7094 Time Due to System or Machine Failures 2.1.2.1. In-System Jobs 2.1.2.2. Relinquish Jobs 2.2. Application for Use of Equipment 2.2.1. The Form 2.2.2. Submission and Approval 2.2.3. Entries on the Problem Specification Form 2.2.4. Changes in the Problem Specification 2.2.5. Problem Abstracts 2.3- Logging and Control of Computer Time 2.3«1« Accounting for Computer Time 2.3.2. Notices to Users Concerning Lapsing Time 2.3.3. Department Reports 2.3'3-l« Internal Reports 2. 3- 3* 2. The Technical Progress Report 2.
  • Burroughs Military Computer

    Burroughs Military Computer

    05684 1 OCTOBER 1965 BURROUGHS MODULAR INTEGRATED CIRCUIT MILITARY COMPUTER ~~~-Burroughs Corporation-- 05684 1 OCTOBER 1965 BURROUGHS MODULAR INTEGRATED CIRCUIT MILITARY COMPUTER CHARTS 1 THROUGH 11 INTRODUCTION CHARTS 12 THROUGH 27 LOGIC/SYSTEM CHARTS 28 THROUGH 37 CIRCUITS CHARTS 38 THROUGH 51 PACKAGING CHARTS 52 THROUGH 54 SUMMARY ;.......!----Burroughs Corporation ---- 1. FUNCTIONAL MODULARITY -MATRIX ORGANIZATION 0825 -1962 0830 -1964 88500-1966 2. ADVANCED MICROCIRCUIT TECHNIQUES*, AND 3. ADVANCED MAULER COMPUTER DESIGN** * FEB. 164 COMPLETION OF 12-BIT ARITHMETIC UNIT (700 I.C"s )­ LIFE-TEST CONTINUING. ** TO IMPROVE T. E.C. (REDUCE IN SIZE, INCREASE MTBF) 1. COMBINED TO PRODUCE D84 * FEATURING PHYSICALLY INDEPENDENT FUNCTIONAL MODULES ALL LOGIC IMPL~M£NTED WITH MONOLITHIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FOR FLEXIBILITY IN SYSTEMS CONFIGURATIONS GROWTH POTENTIAL BUILT-IN COMPACT RELIABILITY LIGHT-WEIGHT LOW POWER CONSUMPTION PROTOTYPE (OPERATIONAL JANUARY 165) DIFFERS FROM PRODUCTION 084 (1) PACKAGING MORE COMPACT-100 % FLATPACK UTILIZATION/LOGISTICAL DISADVANTAGE, AN 0 (2) INSTRUCTION REPERTOIRE-35 BASIC COMMANDS VS. 47 * NOV. 163 START-UP. 2. T 8 D C. N. M. - 11 3 - D II OVER 100 TYPES -- ALL FLATPACKS USED: LINE MAINTENANCE AT FUNCTIONAL MODULE LEVEL 3. 1 D84 C. N. M. .1 2 - D" 35 MAX. TYPES (ON LY 23 IN LOGIC*) : AVERAGE FLATPACK UTILIZATION 10 TO 11 PER CNM: LINE. MAINTENANCE AT CNM (THROWAWAY) LEVEL- MADE PRACTICAL VIA DIAGNOSTICS PROGRA.M * i. e. EXCLUDING MEMORY AND SPECIAL 1/0 CIRCUITS 4. MAJOR ADVANTAGES I. LOW COST • DEVELOPMENT COMPLETE • ONE TIME CHARGES RESTRICTED TO DESIGN OF SPECIAL INTERFACES IN THE IIO MODULE. 2. MODULAR EXPANSIBILITY THROUGH TO MULTIPROCESSING FOR MORE THROUGHPUT AND/OR GRACEFUL DEGRADATION.
  • Corporate Profile of Nihon Unisys, Ltd

    Corporate Profile of Nihon Unisys, Ltd

    Nihon Unisys Group Marketing, Business development and Consulting Infrastructure Services ●Nihon Unisys, Ltd. https://www.unisys.co.jp/e/ ●UNIADEX, Ltd. https://www.uniadex.co.jp/ We coordinate, propose and execute business and ICT services (including We are a global and vendor-agnostic company offering comprehensive Corporate Profile consulting, planning, development, operation and maintenance). services (including consulting, planning, construction, operation and maintenance, facilities) for ICT infrastructure (data center, servers, networks ●UEL Corporation https://www.excel.co.jp/ and devices). We develop 3D CAD/CAM and housing CAD systems as well as business Nihon Unisys, Ltd. solutions and services. ●S&I Co., Ltd. https://sandi.jp/ We provide ICT infrastructure solutions to our clients including consulting,design, ●Cambridge Technology Partners, Ltd. https://en.ctp.co.jp/ construction, operation and maintenance based on virtualization strategy. We provide a wide range of facilitation-driven consulting services from planning for transformation at customers to IT implementation and Systems Services restructuring. ●USOL Vietnam Co., Ltd. https://www.usol-v.com.vn/ AFAS Inc. https://www.afasinc.co.jp/ ● Offshore development center of the Nihon Unisys Group. Our expert professionals in financial business provide the optimal solutions Providing software development services for the Nihon Unisys Group and its for financial institutions. customers in Japan. ●Canal Ventures, Ltd. https://www.canal-v.com/ ●International Systems Development Co., Ltd. https://www.isd.co.jp/ We are a corporate venture capital arm of Nihon Unisys Group. We provide locally based services utilizing latest technology and knowhow in Our mission is to accelerate the digital transformation through Okinawa region. the creation of business ecosystem comprising such players as startups, investors and large companies.
  • The Protection of Information in Computer Systems

    The Protection of Information in Computer Systems

    The Protection of Information in Computer Systems JEROME H. SALTZER, SENIOR MEMBER, IEEE, AND MICHAEL D. SCHROEDER, MEMBER, IEEE Invited Paper Abstract - This tutorial paper explores the mechanics of Confinement protecting computer-stored information from unauthorized Allowing a borrowed program to have access to data, use or modification. It concentrates on those architectural while ensuring that the program cannot release the structures--whether hardware or software--that are information. necessary to support information protection. The paper Descriptor develops in three main sections. Section I describes A protected value which is (or leads to) the physical desired functions, design principles, and examples of address of some protected object. elementary protection and authentication mechanisms. Any Discretionary reader familiar with computers should find the first section (In contrast with nondiscretionary.) Controls on access to be reasonably accessible. Section II requires some to an object that may be changed by the creator of the familiarity with descriptor-based computer architecture. It object. examines in depth the principles of modern protection Domain architectures and the relation between capability systems The set of objects that currently may be directly and access control list systems, and ends with a brief accessed by a principal. analysis of protected subsystems and protected objects. Encipherment The reader who is dismayed by either the prerequisites or The (usually) reversible scrambling of data according the level of detail in the second section may wish to skip to to a secret transformation key, so as to make it safe for Section III, which reviews the state of the art and current transmission or storage in a physically unprotected research projects and provides suggestions for further environment.
  • Sperry Rand's Third-Generation Computers 1964–1980

    Sperry Rand's Third-Generation Computers 1964–1980

    Sperry Rand’s Third-Generation Computers 1964–1980 George T. Gray and Ronald Q. Smith The change from transistors to integrated circuits in the mid-1960s marked the beginning of third-generation computers. A late entrant (1962) in the general-purpose, transistor computer market, Sperry Rand Corporation moved quickly to produce computers using ICs. The Univac 1108’s success (1965) reversed the company’s declining fortunes in the large-scale arena, while the 9000 series upheld its market share in smaller computers. Sperry Rand failed to develop a successful minicomputer and, faced with IBM’s dominant market position by the end of the 1970s, struggled to maintain its position in the computer industry. A latecomer to the general-purpose, transistor would be suitable for all types of processing. computer market, Sperry Rand first shipped its With its top management having accepted the large-scale Univac 1107 and Univac III comput- recommendation, IBM began work on the ers to customers in the second half of 1962, System/360, so named because of the intention more than two years later than such key com- to cover the full range of computing tasks. petitors as IBM and Control Data. While this The IBM 360 did not rely exclusively on lateness enabled Sperry Rand to produce rela- integrated circuitry but instead employed a tively sophisticated products in the 1107 and combination of separate transistors and chips, III, it also meant that they did not attain signif- called Solid Logic Technology (SLT). IBM made icant market shares. Fortunately, Sperry’s mili- a big event of the System/360 announcement tary computers and the smaller Univac 1004, on 7 April 1964, holding press conferences in 1005, and 1050 computers developed early in 62 US cities and 14 foreign countries.
  • TCD-SCSS-T.20121208.032.Pdf

    TCD-SCSS-T.20121208.032.Pdf

    AccessionIndex: TCD-SCSS-T.20121208.032 Accession Date: 8-Dec-2012 Accession By: Prof.J.G.Byrne Object name: Burroughs 1714 Vintage: c.1972 Synopsis: Commercial zero-instruction-set computer used by the Dept.Computer Science from 1973-1979. Just two prototyping boards survive. Description: The Burroughs 1714 was one of their B1700 family, introduced in 1972 to compete with IBM's System/3. The original research for the B1700 series, initially codenamed the Proper Language Processor or Program Language Processor (PLP) was done at the Burroughs Pasadena plant. The family were known as the Burroughs Small Systems, as distinct from the Burroughs Medium Systems (B2000, etc) and the Burroughs Large Systems (B5000, etc). All the Burroughs machines had high-level language architectures. The large were ALGOL machines, the medium COBOL machines, but the small were universal machines. The principal designer of the B1700 family was Wayne T. Wilner. He designed the architecture as a zero-instruction-set computer, an attempt to bridge the inefficient semantic gap between the ideal solution to a particular programming problem and the real physical hardware. The B1700 architecture executed idealized virtual machines for any language from virtual memory. It achieved this feat by microprogramming, see the microinstruction set further below. The Burroughs MCP (Master Control Program) would schedule a particular job to run, then preload the interpreter for whatever language was required into a writeable control store, allowing the machine to emulate the desired virtual machine. The hardware was optimised for this. It had bit-addressable memory, a variable-width ALU, could OR in data from a register into the instruction register (for very efficient instruction parsing), and the output of the ALU was directly addressable as X+Y or X-Y read-only registers.
  • Sperry Corporation, UNIVAC Division Photographs and Audiovisual Materials 1985.261

    Sperry Corporation, UNIVAC Division Photographs and Audiovisual Materials 1985.261

    Sperry Corporation, UNIVAC Division photographs and audiovisual materials 1985.261 This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on September 14, 2021. Description is written in: English. Describing Archives: A Content Standard Audiovisual Collections PO Box 3630 Wilmington, Delaware 19807 [email protected] URL: http://www.hagley.org/library Sperry Corporation, UNIVAC Division photographs and audiovisual materials 1985.261 Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Historical Note ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Scope and Content ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Arrangement ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 6 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 8 Bibliography
  • Creativity – Success – Obscurity

    Creativity – Success – Obscurity

    Author Gerry Pickering CREATIVITY – SUCCESS – OBSCURITY UNIVAC, WHAT HAPPENED? A fellow retiree posed the question of what happened. How did the company that invented the computer snatch defeat from the jaws of victory? The question piqued my interest, thus I tried to draw on my 32 years of experiences in the company and the myriad of information available on the Internet to answer the question for myself and hopefully others that may still be interested 60+ years after the invention and delivery of the first computers. Computers plural, as there were more than one computer and more than one organization from which UNIVAC descended. J. Presper Eckert and John Mauchly, located in Philadelphia PA are credited with inventing the first general purpose computer under a contract with the U.S. Army. But our heritage also traces back to a second group of people in St. Paul MN who developed several computers about the same time under contract with the U.S. Navy. This is the story of how these two companies started separately, merged to become one company, how that merged company named UNIVAC (Universal Automatic Computers) grew to become a main rival of IBM (International Business Machines), then how UNIVAC was swallowed by another company to end up in near obscurity compared to IBM and a changing industry. Admittedly it is a biased story, as I observed the industry from my perspective as an employee of UNIVAC. It is also biased in that I personally observed only a fraction of the events as they unfolded within UNIVAC. This story concludes with a detailed account of my work assignments within UNIVAC.
  • 1. Types of Computers Contents

    1. Types of Computers Contents

    1. Types of Computers Contents 1 Classes of computers 1 1.1 Classes by size ............................................. 1 1.1.1 Microcomputers (personal computers) ............................ 1 1.1.2 Minicomputers (midrange computers) ............................ 1 1.1.3 Mainframe computers ..................................... 1 1.1.4 Supercomputers ........................................ 1 1.2 Classes by function .......................................... 2 1.2.1 Servers ............................................ 2 1.2.2 Workstations ......................................... 2 1.2.3 Information appliances .................................... 2 1.2.4 Embedded computers ..................................... 2 1.3 See also ................................................ 2 1.4 References .............................................. 2 1.5 External links ............................................. 2 2 List of computer size categories 3 2.1 Supercomputers ............................................ 3 2.2 Mainframe computers ........................................ 3 2.3 Minicomputers ............................................ 3 2.4 Microcomputers ........................................... 3 2.5 Mobile computers ........................................... 3 2.6 Others ................................................. 4 2.7 Distinctive marks ........................................... 4 2.8 Categories ............................................... 4 2.9 See also ................................................ 4 2.10 References
  • A History of Silicon Valley the Greatest Creation of Wealth in History (An Immoral Tale) Being a Presentation by Piero Scaruffi

    A History of Silicon Valley the Greatest Creation of Wealth in History (An Immoral Tale) Being a Presentation by Piero Scaruffi

    A History of Silicon Valley The Greatest Creation of Wealth in History (An immoral tale) being a presentation by piero scaruffi www.scaruffi.com adapted from the book “A History of Silicon Valley” Piero Scaruffi • Cultural Historian • Cognitive Scientist • Blogger • Poet • www.scaruffi.com www.scaruffi.com 2 This is Part 2 • See http://www.scaruffi.com/svhistory for the index of this Powerpoint presentation and links to the other parts – 1900-1960 – The 1960s – The 1970s – The 1980s – The 1990s – The 2000s www.scaruffi.com 3 What the book is about… • The book is a history of the high-tech industry in the San Francisco Bay Area (of which Silicon Valley is currently the most famous component) www.scaruffi.com 4 Semiconductors – Fairchild Semiconductors’ planar integrated circuit (1961) – Fairchild Semiconductors employees: Don Farina, Don Valentine, Charles Sporck, Jerry Sanders, Jack Gifford, Mike Markkula – Signetics (1961), first Fairchild spinoff – Main customers of integrated circuits: the Air Force and NASA www.scaruffi.com 5 Life Sciences • Stanford hires Carl Djerassi (1959), inventor of the birth-control pill • Alejandro Zaffaroni’s Syntex relocates to the Stanford Industrial Park (1963) www.scaruffi.com 6 Meanwhile elsewhere… • New York – IBM 7000 transistorized series (1960) – IBM’s SABRE (1960), the first online transaction processing, an adaptation of SAGE to automating American Airlines' reservation system – GE’s IDS (1961), the first database management system • Boston (MIT) – CTSS (1961), the first time-sharing system – "Spacewar" (1962), the first computer game – Ivan Sutherland’s "Sketchpad“ (1963), the first computer program with a GUI www.scaruffi.com 7 Meanwhile elsewhere… • US Government – Paul Baran (Rand Corp): a distributed network of computers can survive a nuclear strike (1962) – Ted Nelson (Harvard Univ): hypertext (1965) – Joseph Licklider (DARPA’s IPTO) funds Project MAC for A.I.
  • M. Craig Weaver Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial

    M. Craig Weaver Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial

    M. Craig Weaver 106 Lakewood Drive Coatesville, PA 19320 (484) 712-0479 [email protected] S UMMARY Software Engineering professional with extensive experience in the design and development of system networking software and layered network architectures. A team-oriented communicator with the ability to solve complex problems using strong analytical skills. Effectively analyzed, designed and developed global networking software products on platforms ranging from micro, server, and mid-range to mainframe computers. Core strengths: • Software design, specification, and programming • Team Management • Software Quality Assurance Testing • Network troubleshooting and problem solution • Software problem analysis and solution • Burroughs Network Architecture expert • Complex protocol design and implementation • Networking and layered network architectures T E C H N I C A L S KILLS LANGUAGES JavaScript, C++, C, ALGOL, FORTRAN, HTML, Intel Assembler, Pascal, and others. PLATFORMS UNIX Systems; Microsoft Windows based systems (WINNT/WIN2000/WINXP); Unisys A-Series; Unisys V-Series; Unisys Clearpath; Unisys ES7000; Burroughs Large Systems; Burroughs Medium systems; Intel Processor based communications processor cards; Burroughs CP9500/B900. P ROFESSIONAL E XPERIENCE Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) 2008 – 2014 International Member Owned Banking Cooperative Manassas, Virginia SENIO R SOFTWARE ENG INEER – CONTRACT FIN Renewal Project – Moving the SWIFT financial application software from Unisys machines (ALGOL) to HP UNIX machines (C++) • Tested ALTOS conversion tool. Created test cases from canonical ALGOL forms, converting them using ALTOS, then comparing the ALGOL and C++ test results. Diagnosed discrepancies and either designed solutions or required changes to the tool. • Converted Unisys ALGOL into UNIX C++ code. Tested, debugged and maintained the converted C++ code.
  • Classification of Computers

    Classification of Computers

    Classification of Computers Computer systems used for business purposes can be divided in to three classes: Microcomputers, Minicomputers and Mainframe computers. Though these divisions are loosely based on the size of the computer systems, there are no hard and fast rules for deciding exactly where one category ends and the next begin. Hence the largest minicomputer systems are often larger than the smallest mainframe computers. The “size” of a computer system is dependent on the size of a computer’s hardware configuration, the nature of its applications, and the complexity of its system software. This helps us to classify a system as a microcomputer, minicomputer or mainframe. Irrespective of size, all computers consist of two basic types of components. Those are processors and input/output (I/O) devices. The processor consists of three parts: the Central Processing Unit, or CPU, main storage and device controllers. The CPU executes instructions, main storage stores instructions and data processed by the CPU and device controllers let the CPU and main storage connect to I/O devices. Note: Though all computer systems consist of three basic components, the way those components are combined for a particular computer system varies depending on the system’s requirements. Microcomputer or Personal Computer Microcomputer is primarily intended for stand-alone use by an individual. Microcomputers are small, single-user systems which provide a simple processor and just a few input/output devices. This system consists of a processor with 2 or 4 GB of main storage, a keyboard, a display monitor, a printer, and a diskette drive with a capacity of 4GB and a 500 GB of hard disk.