DOCSLIB.ORG

Understanding Energy in Montana

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Understanding Energy in Montana UNDERSTANDING ENERGYINMONTANA AGuidetoElectricity,NaturalGas,Coal,Petroleum,andRenewableEnergy ProducedandConsumedinMontana DEQReportupdatedforETIC2013Ͳ2014 ReportoriginallypreparedforEQC 2001Ͳ2002 TableofContents Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..pagei Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….pageiii CommentsontheData…………………………………………………………………………………………………….pageiv Glossary…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….pagev Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………SummaryͲ1 ElectricitySupplyandDemandinMontanaSummary………………………………………………..SummaryͲ2 Montana’sElectricTransmissionGridSummary…………………………………………………………SummaryͲ3 NaturalGasinMontanaSummary……………………………………………………………………………..SummaryͲ4 CoalinMontanaSummary…………………………………………………………………………………………SummaryͲ5 PetroleuminMontanaSummary……………………………………………………………………………….SummaryͲ6 RenewableEnergyinMontanaSummary…………………………………………………………………..SummaryͲ7 ElectricitySupplyandDemandinMontana………………………………………………………………………………..I ElectricityDataTables………………………………………………………………………………………………………………14 Montana’sElectricTransmissionGrid………………………………………………………………………………………23 NaturalGasinMontana…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..44 NaturalGasDataTables………………………………………………………………………………………………………….62 CoalinMontana………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………70 CoalDataTables………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………79 PetroleumandPetroleumProductsinMontana……………………………………………………………………..88 PetroleumDataTables…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..101 RenewableEnergyinMontana………………………………………………………………………………………………115 Preparedbythe DepartmentofEnvironmentalQuality forthe 2013Ͳ2014EnergyandTelecommunicationsInterimCommittee DEQProjectCoordinator:JeffBlend ETICStaffCoordinator:SonjaNowakowski AuthorsofStatistics JeffBlendandGarrettMartin AuthorsofSections JeffBlend–NaturalGasinMontana JeffBlend–ElectricTransmissionGrid JeffBlend–ElectricitySupplyandDemandinMontana JeffBlend–CoalinMontana GarrettMartin–PetroleuminMontana GarrettMartin–RenewableEnergyinMontana PaulDriscoll–HistoricalData PhotocourtesyofPPLMontana i ii Introduction EnergyissuescontinuetoreceivesignificantpublicattentionandscrutinyinMontana.Inthe decadesincethe1997decisiontoderegulateMontana’selectricitysupply,consumershave witnessedtheCaliforniaenergycrisis,thebankruptcyandreemergenceofNorthWestern Energy(NWE),dramaticchangesinthepriceofnaturalgas,hundreddollarbarrelsofoil, serioustalkofnewmarketsandnewtransmissionlinesforMontana,growthinrenewable energyresources,anddiscussionsofclimatechangeandenergyindependence.The EnvironmentalQualityCouncilfirstpreparedthisguidein2002.Itwasrevisedagainin2004and 2010.TheEnergyandTelecommunicationsInterimCommittee(ETIC)in2013agreedtorevise thedocumenttoprovidethemostupͲtoͲdatebackgroundinformationavailableto policymakersandcitizensalike.Forthe2013Ͳ2014guideanew,RenewableEnergyinMontana sectionhasbeenadded.SpecialthanksshouldbeextendedtotheDEQ,particularlyJeffBlend andGarrettMartin,whowereinstrumentalinthepreparationoftheinformationthatprovides thebackboneofthisdocument. Thisguidefocusesonhistoricalandcurrentpatternsofenergysupplyanddemand.Itisdivided intosixsections.FirstisanoverviewofelectricitysupplyanddemandinMontana.Thesecond sectioncoverstheelectricitytransmissionsystem,especiallyhowitworksinMontanaandthe PacificNorthwest.Thisisthecriticalissueaffectingaccesstoexistingmarketsandthepotential fornewgenerationinMontana.Athirdsectionaddressesnaturalgassupplyanddemand, importantinitsownrightandintertwinedwiththeelectricityindustry.Thefourthsection coverstheMontanacoalindustry,whichfuelsthegenerationofelectricity,isanimportant export,andwhosefutureisdependentuponchangesintheelectricindustryandworld markets.Thefifthsectionaddressespetroleum,thesectormostdirectlyaffectedby internationalevents.ThefinalsectiondiscussesrenewableenergydevelopmentinMontana andthepotentialforthatsectortogrowinthefuture. Theguide,withitsfocusonhistoricalandcurrentpatterns,dealsprimarilywithconventional energyresources.Energyefficiencyandenergyconservationaregivenbrieftreatment,simply becausesuchlimiteddataisavailable.Publicagencies,privatebusinesses,andindividual citizensneedtokeeptheissuesofefficiencyandconservationinmindastheyreviewthe conventionalresourcesincludedinthisdocument. iii Commentsonthedata Dataforthisguidecomesfromavarietyofsources,whichdon’talwaysagree.Inpartthisisdue toslightlydifferentdatadefinitionsandmethodsofdatacollection.Thereadershouldalways considerthesourceandcontextofspecificdata. iv Glossary General ResidentialSector:Energyconsumedby BritishThermalUnit(Btu):Astandardunit privatehouseholdestablishmentsprimarily ofenergyequaltothequantityofheat forspaceheating,waterheating,air requiredtoraisethetemperatureof1 conditioning,cooking,lighting,andclothes poundofwaterby1degreeFahrenheit(F). drying. CogenerationorCogenerators:Aprocess thatsequentiallyproducesusefulenergy TransportationSector:Energyconsumedto (thermalormechanical)andelectricityfrom movepeopleandcommoditiesinthepublic thesameenergysources. andprivatesectors,includingmilitary, railroad,vesselbunkering,andmarineuses, CustomerClass:Agroupofcustomerswith aswellasthepipelinetransmissionof similarcharacteristics(e.g.,residential, naturalgas. commercial,industrial,salesforresale) identifiedforthepurposeofsettingautility FossilFuel:Anynaturallyoccurringfuelof ratestructure. anorganicnature,suchascoal,crudeoil, andnaturalgas. DemandͲSideManagement:Utility activitiesdesignedtoreducecustomeruse Fuel:Anysubstancethat,forthepurposeof ofnaturalgasorelectricityorchangethe producingenergy,canbeburned,otherwise timepatternofuseinwaysthatwill chemicallycombined,orsplitorfusedina producedesiredchangesintheutilityload. nuclearreaction. CommercialSector:Energyconsumedby NominalDollars:Dollarsthatmeasure serviceͲprovidingfacilitiesandbusiness pricesthathavenotbeenadjustedforthe equipment.Itincludesfederal,state,and effectsofinflation.Nominaldollarsreflect localgovernments;otherprivateandpublic thepricespaidforproductsorservicesat organizations,suchasreligious,social,or thetimeofthetransaction. fraternalgroups;andinstitutionalliving quarters. RenewableEnergy:Energyobtainedfrom sourcesthatareessentiallysustainable IndustrialSector:Energyconsumedby (unlike,forexample,thefossilfuels,of facilitiesandequipmentusedforproducing, whichthereisafinitesupply).Sourcesof processing,orassemblinggoods.It renewableenergyincludewood,waste, encompassesmanufacturing,agriculture, solarradiation,fallingwater,wind,and forestry,fishingandhunting,mining, geothermalheat. includingoilandgasextraction,and construction. v ShortTon:Aunitofweightequalto2,000 CoalRank:Aclassificationofcoalbasedon pounds.Alltonnagesusedinthisguideare fixedcarbon,volatilematter,andheating inshorttons. value. Coal F.O.B.MinePrice:The"freeonboard" mineprice.Thisisthepricepaidforcoal Coal:AblackorbrownishͲblacksolid measuredindollarspershorttonatthe combustiblesubstanceformedbythe miningoperationsiteand,therefore,does partialdecompositionofvegetablematter notincludefreight/shippingandinsurance withoutfreeaccesstoairandunderthe costs. influenceofmoistureand,often,increased pressureandtemperature.Thecoalrank SurfaceMine:Amineproducingcoalthatis (anthracite,bituminous,subbituminous, usuallywithinafewhundredfeetofthe andlignite)isdeterminedbyitsheating earth'ssurface.Overburden(earthaboveor value. aroundthecoal)isremovedtoexposethe coalbed.Thebedisthenminedusing Anthracite:Hardandjetblackwithahigh surfaceexcavationequipmentsuchas luster;itisthehighestcoalrankandis draglines,powershovels,bulldozers, minedinnortheasternPennsylvania. loaders,andaugers. Anthracitecontainsapproximately22to28 millionBtupertonasreceived. UndergroundMine:Aminetunnelinginto theearthtothecoalbed.Underground Bituminous:Themostcommoncoal;itis minesareclassifiedaccordingtothetypeof soft,dense,andblackwithwellͲdefined openingusedtoreachthecoalͲͲi.e.,drift bandsofbrightanddullmaterial. (leveltunnel),slope(inclinedtunnel),or Bituminousisrankedbetweenanthracite shaft(verticaltunnel). andsubbituminousandisminedchieflyin Kentucky,Pennsylvania,andWestVirginia. ElectricitySupplyandDemand Theheatingvaluerangesfrom19to30 millionBtupertonasreceived. AverageMegawatt(aMW):Aunitof energyoutputoveraspecifiedtimeperiod. Lignite:AbrownishͲblackcoalofthelowest Forayear,itisequivalenttothetotal rank;itisminedinNorthDakota,Montana, energyinmegawattͲhoursdividedby8,760 andTexas.Theheatcontentoflignite (thenumberofhoursinayear). rangesfrom9to17millionBtupertonas received. Capacity:Theamountofelectricpowerthat agenerator,turbine,transformer, Subbituminous:Adullblackcoalranking transmissioncircuit,station,orsystemis betweenligniteandbituminous.Itismined capableofproducingordelivering. chieflyinMontanaandWyoming.Theheat contentofsubbituminouscoalrangesfrom Demand:Therateatwhichelectricenergy 16to24millionBtupertonasreceived. isdeliveredtoasystem,partofasystem,or pieceofequipmentatagiveninstantor duringadesignatedperiodoftime(see Load). vi Generation(Electric):Theproductionof specifiedconditionsasdesignatedbythe electricenergyfromotherformsofenergy; manufacturer.Installedstationcapacity also,theamountofelectricenergy doesnotincludeauxiliaryorhouseunits. produced,expressedinkilowattͲhours. Nameplatecapacityisusuallyshownonthe manufacturer'sidentificationplateattached GrossGeneration:Thetotalamountof mechanicallytotheequipment.Because electricenergyproducedbythegenerating manufacturershavedifferingstandards,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wind Powering America Fy08 Activities Summary
    WIND POWERING AMERICA FY08 ACTIVITIES SUMMARY Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY08 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2008, there were more than 16,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 7,000 MW projected by year end, bringing the U.S. installed capacity to more than 23,000 MW by the end of 2008. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Twenty-two states now have more than 100 MW installed, compared to 17 at the end of 2007. We anticipate that four or five additional states will join the 100-MW club in 2009, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. Of course, the 20% Wind Energy by 2030 report (developed by AWEA, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and other stakeholders) indicates that 44 states may be in the 100-MW club by 2030, and 33 states will have more than 1,000 MW installed (at the end of 2008, there were six states in that category).
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Energy in Montana
    UNDERSTANDING ENERGY IN MONTANA A Guide to Electricity, Natural Gas, Coal, and Petroleum Produced and Consumed in Montana DEQ Report updated for ETIC 2009-2010 Report originally prepared for EQC 2001-2002 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................page i Introduction ............................................................................................................page iii Comments on the Data ..........................................................................................page iv Glossary ........................................................................................................page v Summary.........................................................................................................Summary-1 Electricity Supply and Demand Summary .......................................................Summary-2 Electric Transmission Grid Summary ..............................................................Summary-4 Natural Gas Summary.....................................................................................Summary-6 Coal Summary ................................................................................................Summary-8 Petroleum Summary......................................................................................Summary-10 Electricity Supply and Demand in Montana..................................................................... 1 Electricity Data Tables..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GNC SWOT Analysis Final Report
    Final Report | Great Northern Corridor SWOT Analysis TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 6 (Final Report) 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 5. Report Date December 31, 2014 4. Title and Subtitle 6. Performing Organization Code Great Northern Corridor Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Analysis Final Report 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. 6 (Final Report) Olsson Associates Parsons Brinckerhoff The Beckett Group 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Olsson Associates 11. Contract or Grant No. 2111 S. 67th Street, Suite 200 Omaha, NE 68106 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Research Programs Type: Project Final Report Montana Department of Transportation Period Covered: January-November 2014 2701 Prospect Avenue P.O. Box 201001 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 5401 Helena MT 59620-1001 15. Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with the Montana Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract The GNC Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Analysis Final Report is the culmination of a ten-month study of the Great Northern Corridor as requested by the GNC Coalition. The Final Report combines the key messages of the previous five Technical Memoranda, which addressed the Corridor’s Infrastructure and Operations, Freight & Commodity Flows, SWOT Analysis & Scenario Planning Workshop, Economic & Environmental Impacts Analysis, and Project Prioritization. This Final Report intends to tell the compelling story of the Corridor today and how it can strategically position itself for continued and improved performance, access, safety, and reliability in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Energy Challenges and Opportunities
    Offshore Wind Energy Challenges and Opportunities Fishery Management Council Coordinating Committee May 18, 2021 Brian Hooker | Office of Renewable Energy Programs Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Energy OCS Lands Act: "… vital national resource … expeditious and orderly development … environmental safeguards" Energy Policy Act of 2005: "… energy from sources other than oil and gas …" Alaska OCS Pacific OCS Gulf of Mexico OCS Atlantic OCS 2 Biden Administration Offshore Wind Energy Goals o March 29, 2021 the White House issued a “whole-of-government approach” to offshore wind energy development including: o Establishing a Target of Employing Tens of Thousands of Workers to Deploy 30 Gigawatts (30,000 megawatts) of Offshore Wind by 2030 (BOEM). o Partnering with Industry on Data- Sharing (NOAA). o Studying Offshore Wind Impacts. (NOAA). 3 Renewable Energy Program by the Numbers Competitive Lease Sales Completed: 8 Active Commercial Offshore Leases: 17 Site Assessment Plans (SAPs) Approved: 11 General Activities & Research Plans Approved: 2 Construction and Operations Plans (COPs): • Under Review 14 • Anticipated within next 12 months 2 Regulatory Guidance: 11 Leasing Under Consideration: 7 Steel in the Water: 2020 4 Atlantic OCS Renewable Energy: “Projects in the Pipeline” Project Company 2020 Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind Pilot South Fork Vineyard Wind I Revolution Wind Skipjack Windfarm Empire Wind Bay State Wind U.S. Wind Sunrise Wind Ocean Wind Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind Commercial Park City Wind Mayflower Wind Atlantic Shores Kitty Hawk 2030 OCS-A 0522 5 Pacific OCS Renewable Energy State Project Nominations California Humboldt Call Area 10 California Morro Bay Call Area 11 California Diablo Canyon Call Area 11 Hawaii Oahu North Call Area 2 Hawaii Oahu South Call Area 3 6 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • (MATL) 230-KV Transmission Line Comments/Response
    DOE/EIS-0399 Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Montana Alberta Tie Ltd. (MATL) 230-kV Transmission Line VOLUME 2 COMMENT RESPONSE DOCUMENT September 2008 United States Department of Energy State of Montana Department of Environmental Quality COVER SHEET Responsible Agencies: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) are co-lead agencies; the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Department of the Interior, is a cooperating agency. Title: Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Montana Alberta Tie Ltd. (MATL) 230-kV Transmission Line (DOE/EIS-0399) Location: Cascade, Teton, Chouteau, Pondera, Toole, and Glacier counties, Montana. Contacts: For further information about this Final EIS, contact: Ellen Russell, Project Manager, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Ave., S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585, (202) 586-9624, or [email protected]. For general information on DOE’s National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, contact: Carol Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, at the above address, (202) 586-4600, or leave a message at (800) 472-2756. For general information on the State of Montana Major Facility Siting Act process, contact: Tom Ring, Environmental Science Specialist, Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), PO Box 200901, Helena, MT 59620-0901, or (406) 444-6785. For general information on the State of Montana Environmental Policy Act process, contact: Greg Hallsten, Environmental Science Specialist, at the above address, or (406) 444-3276. Abstract: MATL proposes to construct and operate a merchant 230-kV transmission line between Great Falls, Montana, and Lethbridge, Alberta, that would cross the U.S.-Canada border north of Cut Bank, Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Name WECC Variable Generation Planning Reference
    Document name WECC Variable Generation Planning Reference Book Category ( ) Regional Reliability Standard ( ) Regional Criteria ( ) Policy ( ) Guideline (x) Report or other ( ) Charter Document date May 14, 2013 Adopted/approved by Variable Generation Subcommittee Date adopted/approved May 14, 2013 Custodian (entity responsible for maintenance and upkeep) Stored/filed Physical location: Web URL: Previous name/number (if any) Status ( ) in effect ( ) usable, minor formatting/editing required ( ) modification needed ( ) superseded by _____________________ ( ) other _____________________________ ( ) obsolete/archived) WESTERN ELECTRICITY COORDINATING COUNCIL • WWW.WECC.BIZ 155 NORTH 400 WEST • SUITE 200 • SALT LAKE CITY • UTAH • 84103- 1114 • PH 801.582.0353 WECC Variable Generation Planning Reference Book A Guidebook for Including Variable Generation in the Planning Process Volume 1: Main Document Version 1 May 14, 2013 May 14, 2013 iii Project Lead Dr. Yuri V. Makarov, Chief Scientist – Power Systems, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) Project Manager Matthew Hunsaker, Renewable Integration Manager Contributors Art Diaz-Gonzalez, Supervisory Power System Dispatcher, Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) Ross T. Guttromson, PE, MBA, Manager Energy Storage, Sandia National Laboratory Dr. Pengwei Du, Research Engineer, PNNL Dr. Pavel V. Etingov, Senior Research Engineer, PNNL Dr. Hassan Ghoudjehbaklou, Senior Transmission Planner, San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) Dr. Jian Ma, PE, PMP, Research Engineer, PNNL David Tovar, Principal Electrical Systems Engineer, El Paso Electric Company Dr. Vilayanur V. Viswanathan, PNNL Dr. Bharat Vyakaranam, PNNL WECC Member Reviewers Variable Generation Subcommittee Members Antonio Alvarez, Manager IRP, Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) Steve Enyeart, Customer Service Engineering, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Yi Zhang, California Independent System Operator (ISO) PNNL Peer Reviewers and Content Advisors Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • REVISED 2020 Power Source Disclosure Filing
    DOCKETED Docket Number: 21-PSDP-01 Project Title: Power Source Disclosure Program - 2020 TN #: 238715 Document Title: REVISED 2020 Power Source Disclosure Filing Public Redacted version of the 2020 Power Source Disclosure Description: Annual Filing of Direct Energy Business, LLC Filer: Barbara Farmer Organization: Direct Energy Business, LLC Submitter Role: Applicant Submission Date: 7/7/2021 1:51:24 PM Docketed Date: 7/7/2021 Version: April 2021 2020 POWER SOURCE DISCLOSURE ANNUAL REPORT For the Year Ending December 31, 2020 Retail suppliers are required to use the posted template and are not allowed to make edits to this format. Please complete all requested information. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS RETAIL SUPPLIER NAME Direct Energy Business, LLC ELECTRICITY PORTFOLIO NAME CONTACT INFORMATION NAME Barbara Farmer TITLE Reulatory Reporting Analyst MAILING ADDRESS 12 Greenway Plaza, Suite 250 CITY, STATE, ZIP Houston, TX 77046 PHONE (281)731-5027 EMAIL [email protected] WEBSITE URL FOR https://business.directenergy.com/privacy-and-legal PCL POSTING Submit the Annual Report and signed Attestation in PDF format with the Excel version of the Annual Report to [email protected]. Remember to complete the Retail Supplier Name, Electricity Portfolio Name, and contact information above, and submit separate reports and attestations for each additional portfolio if multiple were offered in the previous year. NOTE: Information submitted in this report is not automatically held confidential. If your company wishes the information submitted to be considered confidential an authorized representative must submit an application for confidential designation (CEC-13), which can be found on the California Energy Commissions's website at https://www.energy.ca.gov/about/divisions-and-offices/chief-counsels-office.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Energy Challenges and Opportunities
    Tab 7a May 2021 Offshore Wind Energy Challenges and Opportunities Fishery Management Council Coordinating Committee May 18, 2021 Brian Hooker | Office of Renewable Energy Programs Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Energy OCS Lands Act: "… vital national resource … expeditious and orderly development … environmental safeguards" Energy Policy Act of 2005: "… energy from sources other than oil and gas …" Alaska OCS Pacific OCS Gulf of Mexico OCS Atlantic OCS 2 Biden Administration Offshore Wind Energy Goals o March 29, 2021 the White House issued a “whole-of-government approach” to offshore wind energy development including: o Establishing a Target of Employing Tens of Thousands of Workers to Deploy 30 Gigawatts (30,000 megawatts) of Offshore Wind by 2030 (BOEM). o Partnering with Industry on Data- Sharing (NOAA). o Studying Offshore Wind Impacts. (NOAA). 3 Renewable Energy Program by the Numbers Competitive Lease Sales Completed: 8 Active Commercial Offshore Leases: 17 Site Assessment Plans (SAPs) Approved: 11 General Activities & Research Plans Approved: 2 Construction and Operations Plans (COPs): • Under Review 14 • Anticipated within next 12 months 2 Regulatory Guidance: 11 Leasing Under Consideration: 7 Steel in the Water: 2020 4 Atlantic OCS Renewable Energy: “Projects in the Pipeline” Project Company 2020 Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind Pilot South Fork Vineyard Wind I Revolution Wind Skipjack Windfarm Empire Wind Bay State Wind U.S. Wind Sunrise Wind Ocean Wind Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind Commercial Park City Wind Mayflower Wind Atlantic Shores Kitty Hawk 2030 OCS-A 0522 5 Pacific OCS Renewable Energy State Project Nominations California Humboldt Call Area 10 California Morro Bay Call Area 11 California Diablo Canyon Call Area 11 Hawaii Oahu North Call Area 2 Hawaii Oahu South Call Area 3 6 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the US Wind Power Industry
    +44 20 8123 2220 [email protected] Analyzing the US Wind Power Industry https://marketpublishers.com/r/A2BBD5C7FFBEN.html Date: June 2011 Pages: 230 Price: US$ 300.00 (Single User License) ID: A2BBD5C7FFBEN Abstracts The rise of wind energy is no longer being looked upon as an alternate source of energy. The United States is a leader in the field of wind energy and the US in 2010 was the second largest user of wind energy in the world, just behind China. In fact, the US had over 40,000 megawatts of installed capacity of wind power by the end of 2010. Aruvian’s R’search presents an analysis of the US Wind Power Industry in its research report Analyzing the US Wind Power Industry. In this research offering, we carry out an in-depth analysis of the wind power market in the United States. We begin with an analysis of the market profile, market statistics, wind power generation by state, installed capacity growth, analysis of wind resources in the US, and many other points that are important for investors looking to invest in the US wind power sector. This report also undertakes a cost analysis of wind power in the US, along with an analysis of the major market trends and challenges facing the industry. The small wind turbines market in the US is analyzed comprehensively in this report as well and includes a market profile, market statistics, the emergence and importance of hybrid small wind turbines, very small wind turbines, wind-diesel hybrid turbine systems, and the economics of small wind turbines.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Prediction Modelling and Validation Using Coherent Doppler LIDAR Data
    Faculty of Science and Engineering Department of Physics and Astronomy Wind Prediction Modelling and Validation Using Coherent Doppler LIDAR Data Muhammad Omer Mughal This Thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Curtin University July 2016 1 DECLARATION To the best of my knowledge and belief this thesis contains no material previously published by any other person except where due acknowledgement has been made. This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university. Muhammad Omer Mughal Signature……………… Date 30/11/2016 II Table of Contents Acronyms ....................................................................................................... VIII List of Figures ................................................................................................. XII List of Tables .............................................................................................. XVIII Abstract ......................................................................................................... XXI List of Publications ....................................................................................... XXV Chapter 1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Status of Wind Energy Modelling and Management .......................... 5 1.2 The Research Opportunity ................................................................. 7 1.3 The Numerical Modelling Strategy for Wind Forecasting
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Technology Workforce Report
    Opportunities for Energy Technology Program Graduates in Montana’s Energy Industry Diana Maneta, Energy Industry Liaison University of Montana College of Technology June 28, 2010 Summary The Energy Technology Program at the University of Montana’s College of Technology in Missoula, Montana, is a two-year Associate of Applied Science degree program intended to train students for careers in the energy industry, with an emphasis on renewable energy and energy efficiency. The purpose of this study was to assess Montana’s energy industry with a focus on potential job opportunities for graduates of the Energy Technology Program. The study involved interviews with representatives of 36 energy-related companies in the state, including renewable energy system installers, wind farm operators, manufacturers of renewable systems and components, energy efficiency companies, utilities/electric cooperatives, and power plants. Based on these interviews, the study concludes that there will be an estimated 150-250 job openings over the next two years in Montana’s energy industry that graduates of the Energy Technology Program will be eligible for, though many of these positions will be highly competitive. The sector with the greatest number of job openings will be energy efficiency. Program graduates that wish to pursue further training or education will find that either apprenticeships in electrical fields or bachelor’s degrees will enhance their job prospects in the energy industry. Finally, as policies and incentives for energy efficiency and renewable
    [Show full text]
  • Programmatic Environmental Impact Staement for Northern Border
    APPENDIX F NORTHERN BORDER PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (PEIS) CUMULATIVE SCENARIO Northern Border Activities F-1 July 2012 1.1 NON-U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES CONTRIBUTING TO CUMULATIVE IMPACTS Cumulative impacts are the result of adding the incremental impacts of the proposed action to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions. The Customs and Border Protection (CBP) northern border program includes multiple projects and activities. Therefore, the cumulative analysis in the PEIS first discusses the added and synergistic effects of all the individual actions that make up the CBP northern border program. Then the range of actions considered in the cumulative analysis is expanded to address the incremental effects of adding the CBP program to other, non-CBP program past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects and activities. Table F-1 lists significant non-CBP projects and activities that could affect the resources potentially affected by the proposed action. The cumulative analysis assumes the implementation of all mitigation measures required by statute and regulation as well as mitigation measures that are part of the CBP program along the northern border. These mitigation measures are considered to be in place for purposes of analysis. Northern Border Activities F-2 July 2012 Table F-1. Non-CBP Projects that Contribute to Cumulative Impacts Project Or Time Spatial Impact-Causing Affected Resource Activity Frame Extent Factors or Issue1 ENTIRE BORDER Vehicular
    [Show full text]